Synthesis and Characterization of Manganese Doped
Synthesis and Characterization of Manganese Doped
1
Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology Laboratory, Institute of Advanced Technology Universiti Putra Malaysia,
43400 Serdang, Selangor D.E., Malaysia.
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
[email protected]
Abstract: Various levels of manganese (Mn)-doped at room temperature [1]. It is an inexpensive and
ZnO were synthesized by precipitation method. environmentally safe host material. Due to its
Characterization was carried out by XRD, TEM, properties, the interest in ZnO as a photocatalyst has
SEM, EDX, BET and the band gap measured by increased, however it has been mainly used under
UV-visible reflectance. In the XRD pattern of ultra violet (UV) irradiation [2-6]. Photocatalytic
samples, there is no signature of impurity peaks, reaction is initiated when a photoexcited electron is
which could indicate Mn-related secondary promoted from the filled valence band (VB) of a
phases. The EDX show the amount of Mn doped semiconductor photocatalyst (SC) to the empty
on ZnO is slightly lower than the theoretical value. conduction band (CB) as the absorbed photon energy,
The SEM of 1% Mn-doped ZnO illustrated that hν, equals or exceeds the band gap of the
morphology is well ordered, has low aggregation, photocatalyst. The hole pair (e--h+) is generated at the
and homogeneous distribution of particle size. surface of the photoexcited photocatalyst as shown
High aggregation is observed, however, in other below [7].
percentages of Mn-doped ZnO. Results of TEM Photoexcitation : SC+hν→ e− +h+ (1)
show that more than 50% of the particles for Adsorbed oxygen: (O2)ads +e→− O2−• (2)
undoped and Mn-doped ZnO use between 15 and Ionization of water : H2O → OH− +H+ (3)
35 nm, with 1% Mn doped ZnO having the Protonation of superoxides : O2−• +H+→ HOO• (4)
highest percentage (77%). The BET shows that HOO• + e− → HO2− (5)
the surface area of synthesized catalyst increases HOO− +H+→ H2O2 (6)
when the weight ratio of manganese increases up H2O2+e-→ OH− +OH• (7)
to 1% Mn, but decreases thereafter. The band gap H2O+h+→H++OH• (8)
of 1% Mn-doped ZnO is 2.2 eV which is smaller Since 46% of solar energy consists of visible light, it
than the undoped ZnO band gap. The results of is more economical to use visible light than UV light
characterization show 1% Mn-doped ZnO has the in large scale operations. To use visible light, ZnO
highest surface area, the lowest particles size and however has several drawbacks including the low
the lowest agglomerate. Moreover the calculated surface area or big particles size and an unsuitable
band gap of 1% Mn-doped ZnO is lower than band gap energy (Eg=3.7 eV). It was observed that
others except 0.5%Mn. Additionally, doping with 3d metals reduced the Eg of
photodegradation of cresols under visible light semiconductors by forming interband-gap localized
showed that 1% Mn-doped ZnO had maximum levels [8]. The charge-transfer transition between the
adsorption and rate of photodegradation. In d-electron of dopant (t2g levels) and the CB or VB
conclusion 1% Mn doped ZnO is suitable as the was reported [9]. On the other hand, the metal d-
best photocatalyst to degrade cresols under visible orbital’s are mixed with the CB and VB of
light irradiation. semiconductors [10]. This overlap is because wide
VB or CB directly decreases Eg. Recently, there has
Keywords: ZnO; Co-precipitation; Manganese- been much attention focused on modifying ZnO by
doping; Optical properties; Nanoparticles doping with transition metals such as Ag [11], Ni
[12], Cu [13], Co [14], Cr [15], Ti [16]. These studies
1. Introduction demonstrated that the metals can change Eg of ZnO,
ZnO is a II-VI semiconductor with wide direct- and that the dopants can control ZnO grain size. It
gap (3.37 eV) and exciton binding energy (60 meV) demonstrated the presence of the d-electron because
atoms are located at substitutional sites for lower conducted to investigate the morphology and
doping concentrations [22]. particles size of the samples. The TEM morphology
As observed in Fig. 1, the (101) peak (crystal plate) of 1% Mn-doped ZnO confirmed the low aggregation
of 1% Mn is broader than other peaks, because 1% and better distribution in SEM images (Fig. 3). In
Mn photocatalyst has a different crystalline size. addition, the TEM images showed spherical
Using the Debye-Scherrer equation [23] and the half- nanocrystallites for 1%Mn-doped ZnO (Expanded
width of the XRD lines, the average values of part in Fig. 3). The measured particles size of
crystalline size of the samples were calculated based samples showed (Table 2) more than 50% of
on the 101 crystal plate and are shown in Table 1. frequency was between 15 and 35 nm while the
The crystalline size of photocatalyst decreased with highest percentage (77%) belonged to 1% Mn doped
increasing percentage of Mn over 1%. Beyond this, ZnO. This indicates that the addition of Mn may be
the crystal size increased again. It may be the doping control the growth of ZnO grains.
of Mn in ZnO can control crystal size, as observed
for other transition metals such as Co [14], Cr [15].
Table 1 XRD data, Mn determined by EDX and Table 2 the particles size distribution of the U-ZnO
particles size of U-ZnO and Mn doped ZnO and Mn-doped ZnO
control of growth of ZnO grains by Mn. However, less than C-ZnO’s Eg. It may be due to a defect in the
the surface area was shown to decrease above 1% synthesised photocatalyst [25]. The Eg of 0.5% Mn-
Mn, which confirms the TEM and SEM observations. doped ZnO is 1.5 eV. It may be due to s-d and p-d
Agglomeration is a limiting factor for surface area. exchange interaction [26-27]. This electron-hole may
SEM and TEM images showed that with above 1% improve photodegradation but most of them are
Mn, the agglomeration increases, and this may be due trapped by sub–surface recombination [28]. The Eg
to a decrease in surface area. of 1% Mn-doped ZnO was 2.2 eV. The d-electron of
Mn (t2g level) can easily overlap with the ZnO’s
valence band (VB) because t2g of Mn is very close to
VB of ZnO [17]. This overlap causes a wide VB and
consequently decreases the Eg of ZnO photocatalyst
so that the VB electrons can be excited by visible
light irradiation. The Eg of 1.5% and 2% Mn-doped
ZnO was 2.6 eV, which is higher than the Eg of 1%
Mn-doped ZnO. Similar behavior was observed for
vanadium doped ZnO, with Eg higher with an
increased vanadium concentration [29]. This might
be due to the influence of numerous factors such as
structural parameters, carrier concentrations and the
presence of defects such as oxygen vacancies, which
may lead to the Burstein Moss shift [30].
4. Conclusion
Various levels of Mn-doped ZnO were synthesized
by precipitation method. Characterization was carried
out by XRD, TEM, SEM, EDX, BET, and the band
gap measured by UV-visible reflectance. In order to
evaluate the synthesised photocatalyst, cresol
photodegradation was studied under visible-light
irradiation with C-ZnO and synthesised
Fig. 7 Photodegradation of m-cresol by C-ZnO, U-ZnO photocatalyst. In the XRD pattern of samples, there is
and 1%Mn- doped ZnO under visible-light irradiation. no signature of impurity peaks, which might belong
Initial conditions: m-cresol= 35ppm; photocatalyst = to Mn-related secondary phases, while the EDX
1.5g/L and pH =7.63 confirmed the amount of Mn doped on ZnO which
was very close to the theoretical value. The SEM of
1% Mn-doped ZnO illustrated the morphology is well
ordered, has low aggregation, and has a
homogeneous distribution of particle size. Results of
TEM showed that more than 77% of the 1% Mn
doped ZnO particles were between 15-35 nm. The
BET show that the surface area of the 1% Mn doped
ZnO was the highest. The band gap of 1% Mn-doped
ZnO is 2.2 eV which is smaller than U-ZnO band
gap. The characterization of photocatalyst indicated
that 1% Mn-doped ZnO in comparison with U-ZnO,
0.5%, 1.5% and 2% Mn-doped ZnO has a higher
surface area, lower particle size and lower
agglomerate. Moreover, the calculated band gap of
Fig. 8 Photodegradation of p-cresol by C-ZnO, U- 1% Mn-doped ZnO is lower than the others except
ZnO and 1%Mn- doped ZnO under visible-light 0.5% Mn. Additionally, photodegradation of cresols
irradiation. Initial conditions: p-cresol= 35ppm; under visible light showed that 1% Mn doped ZnO
photocatalyst = 1.5g/L and pH =7.49 had maximum adsorption and rate of
photodegradation. In conclusion, 1% Mn-doped ZnO
is suitable as the best photocatalyst for removing
cresols.