Persecution of The Early Church
Persecution of The Early Church
Ronald Welsh
CHHI301-D09
Rick Wade in his article Persecution in the Early Church takes a look at the early church
and the suffering and persecution that took place under Roman Emperors. Additionally, Wade
addresses the question of why did the Christians suffer and lists several reasons why people
viewed Christians differently from those who practiced Judaism. He cites several reasons in his
article that could correspond to the culture of today. People felt threatened by this new religion,
Christians were considered anti-social and a threat to the well- being of the community are some
of the reasons the author points out. Wade identifies Roman Emperors who persecuted the early
church and gives examples of what each one did to outdo the other. For example, Nero wanted to
rebuild the city of Rome and start over but he needed someone to cast the blame on so he blamed
the Christians. The Christians were already considered troublemakers, so the people had no
problem believing that they indeed were responsible. Wade writes that, “a vast multitude of
Christians were put to death in the most shocking manner.” Nero persecuted the Christians so
The spread of the Gospel throughout the Roman Empire can be attributed to the “Pax
Romana”, or the “Peace of Rome”. H. Carey Oakley in his article The Greek and Roman
Background of the New Testament identifies several Emperors whose statesmanship, diplomacy,
and vision created a Rome where people were united. There was a peace throughout the empire
due to the Roman Army and the justice that was administered by the provincial governors.
Coinage was created that sent messages through emblems and inscriptions that were used as a
means of spreading imperial propaganda. Oakley gives several other reasons why the culture was
ready for the Gospel, but the key was the Roman Infrastructure. Oakley points out in his article
3
that Rome was surrounded by a road system that was second to none. The Roman Army guarded
the road network and in some cases was responsible for the repair when they were not fighting.
This network of roads and the safety it afforded was instrumental in the spread of Christianity
throughout the Empire. Merchants, traders, missionaries could travel by land or sea without fear
of pirates or robbers. The network of roads that were created during this time, which included the
“great trunk road” from the Adriatic to Constantinople, the same road Paul travelled from
Philippi to Thessalonica were instrumental for travel. Additionally, missionaries like Dio
Chrysostom spent years traveling these roads, ministering to people and warning them of the
“moral evils of the day.” The article gives further examples of saints like Phoebe and
Epaphroditus who carried or delivered letters, monies, or gifts to other believers using the roads
that were built during this period of peace. Through one man’s vision (Augustus) whose main
purpose was to build the Republic, rule fairly, administer justice efficiently, and make Rome the
greatest of all nations, Christianity was afforded the opportunity to use that peace that prevailed
Nestorianism
History’s Intriguing Questions by Mark Dickens and Annette Morrow on Nestorianism the
authors came up with a unique approach in presenting the information. Dickens would start
giving the PROs of why Nestorius did not intend to argue that Christ had a dual nature and then
Morrow would argue the CONs of the controversy. Throughout this lengthly article, the reader is
given some background information about Nestorius and his rise to prominence. Both authors
point out that Nestorius was a very controversial figure and was very well known for his ascetic
practices and public speaking ability. Nestorius was selected to be the bishop of Constantinople
4
by Theodosius II. Soon after his selection he acted immediately and took disciplinary action
against several groups or and individuals who were acting “incorrectly.” Nestorius was against
the popular practice of calling the Virgin Mary as Theotokos, the “God-bearer” or “Mother of
God” which got him in trouble with some rival bishops as the article goes on and points out.
Because of this teaching Nestorius was accused of heresy, by teaching that there were two
persons, not two natures in Christ. This article gives the PRO/CONS of the accusations that were
made against Nestorius and if the Council of Ephesus who dealt with this issue had made the
right decision when they decided that Nestorianism would be considered heresy. Nestorius was
condemned and exiled as a heretic during the fifth century because of his beliefs by the Council
of Ephesus in 431.
Bibliography
Oakley, H The Greek and Roman Background of the New Testament, London School of
Theology http://www.1st.ac.uk/ December 2006, prepared for the web by Robert
Bradshaw, http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/ (accessed Oct 21, 2014)
Dickens, Mark and Annette Morrow Nestorius did not intend to argue that Christ had a dual
Nature, but that view became labeled Nestorianism http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?
id=GALE
%7CCX1766100032&V=2.1&U=vic_liberty&it=r&p=GVRL&SW=w&asid=902835011
235e473610C898oacfob9fo (accessed Oct 24, 2014)
5