Risk and The Cost of Capital: Principles of Corporate Finance
Risk and The Cost of Capital: Principles of Corporate Finance
Slides by
Matthew Will
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
9-2
Topics Covered
Ø Company and Project Costs of Capital
Ø Measuring the Cost of Equity
Ø Analyzing Project Risk
Ø Certainty Equivalents
9-3
SML
Required
return
3.8
Company Cost of
Capital
0.2
0
Project Beta
0.5
9-5
V = D+E IMPORTANT
D = Market Value of Debt E, D, and V are all
E = Market Value of Equity market values of
Equity, Debt and
Total Firm Value
r = rf + B ( rm - rf )
becomes
requity = rf + B ( rm - rf )
9-8
Measuring Betas
Ø The SML shows the relationship between
return and risk
Ø CAPM uses Beta as a proxy for risk
Ø Other methods can be employed to
determine the slope of the SML and thus
Beta
Ø Regression analysis can be used to find Beta
9-9
Measuring Betas
9-10
Measuring Betas
9-11
Measuring Betas
9-12
Estimated Betas
Standard
Beta equity Error
Burlington Northern Santa
Fe 1.01 0.19
Canadian Pacific 1.34 0.23
CSX 1.14 0.22
Kansas City Southern 1.75 0.29
Norfolk Southern 1.05 0.24
Union Pacific 1.16 0.21
Industry portfolio 1.24 0.18
9-13
Beta Stability
% IN SAME % WITHIN ONE
RISK CLASS 5 CLASS 5
CLASS YEARS LATER YEARS LATER
10 (High betas) 35 69
9 18 54
8 16 45
7 13 41
6 14 39
5 14 42
4 13 40
3 16 45
2 21 61
1 (Low betas) 40 62
Source: Sharpe and Cooper (1972)
9-14
⎛ D ⎞ ⎛ E ⎞
Bassets = BDebt × ⎜ ⎟ + Bequity × ⎜ ⎟
⎝ V ⎠ ⎝ V ⎠
9-15
Expected 20
return (%)
Requity=15
Rassets=12.2
Rrdebt=8
0
0 0.2 0.8 1.2
Bdebt Bassets Bequity
Company Cost of Capital 9-16
simple approach
Example
1/3 New Ventures B=2.0
1/3 Expand existing business B=1.3
1/3 Plant efficiency B=0.6
Asset Betas
PV(fixed cost)
Brevenue = Bfixed cost +
PV(revenue)
PV(variable cost) PV(asset)
+ B variable cost + Basset
PV(revenue) PV(revenue)
9-19
Asset Betas
⎡ PV(fixed cost) ⎤
= Brevenue ⎢1 + ⎥
⎣ PV(asset) ⎦
9-20
Example
Project Z will produce just one cash flow, forecasted at $1 million at
year 1. It is regarded as average risk, suitable for discounting at a 10%
company cost of capital:
C1 1,000,000
PV = = = $909,100
1+ r 1.1
9-21
Example- continued
But now you discover that the company’s engineers are behind
schedule in developing the technology required for the project. They
are confident it will work, but they admit to a small chance that it will
not. You still see the most likely outcome as $1 million, but you also
see some chance that project Z will generate zero cash flow next year.
9-22
Example- continued
This might describe the initial prospects of project Z. But if
technological uncertainty introduces a 10% chance of a zero cash flow,
the unbiased forecast could drop to $900,000.
900,000
PV = = $818,000
1.1
9-23
Table 9.2
9-24
Ct CEQt
PV = t
= t
(1 + r ) (1 + rf )
9-25
r = rf + B( rm − rf )
= 6 + .75(8)
= 12%
9-28
Project A
Year Cash Flow PV @ 12%
1 100 89.3
2 100 79.7
r = rf + B( rm − rf )
= 6 + .75(8) 3 100 71.2
= 12% Total PV 240.2
9-29
Project A
Year Cash Flow PV @ 12%
1 100 89.3 Now assume that the cash
2
3
100
100
79.7
71.2
flows change, but are
Total PV 240.2 RISK FREE. What is the
r = rf + B( rm − rf ) new PV?
= 6 + .75(8)
= 12%
9-30
Project B
Project A Year Cash Flow PV @ 6%
Year Cash Flow PV @ 12%
1 94.6 89.3
1 100 89.3
2 100 79.7
2 89.6 79.7
3 100 71.2 3 84.8 71.2
Total PV 240.2 Total PV 240.2
9-31
Project A Project B
Year Cash Flow PV @ 12% Year Cash Flow PV @ 6%
1 100 89.3 1 94.6 89.3
2 100 79.7 2 89.6 79.7
3 100 71.2 3 84.8 71.2
Total PV 240.2 Total PV 240.2
Deduction
Year Cash Flow CEQ
for risk
1 100 94.6 5.4
2 100 89.6 10.4
3 100 84.8 15.2
9-33
100
Year 1 = = 94.6
1.054
100
Year 2 = 2
= 89.6
1.054
100
Year 3 = 3
= 84.8
1.054