STS First Year
STS First Year
Learning objective:
1. Develop their own understanding of technology
2. Discuss the essence of technology and modern technology
3. Explain and illustrate the dangers of modern technology
4. Explain why art is the saving power of modern technology
The consequences of human flourishing. Humanity has taken control of the environment to take advantage of
its natural resources. It takes millions of years for a mountain to take shape but only few years to flatten it to make
way for the development of broad’s subdivisions and other structures. Modernization advances science, technology,
and the human future at the cost of nature’s degradation. Some scientist had stated that the emergence of artificial
intelligence poses a great danger to humanity. It affects not only humans but also the environment which we are all
experiencing.
He defined technology as the advancement of scientific knowledge to solve simple to complex problems or the
manner in which a task is finished using different technical processes.
Heidegger sees reality as a result of causes or means. He places Aristotle four causes in parallel to his own
perspective. According to Aristotle, the first cause is material cause (causa materialis) or the material out of which an
object is made. The second is formal cause (causa formalis) or the shape or form of the object as it was produced.
The third is final cause (causa finalis) or the purpose or function of the object. The fourth is efficient cause (causa
efficiens), which causes change in an object.
To elaborate the concept of the four causes. Heidegger uses a silver chalice as an example. According to him,
silver is the chalice’s material cause. The shape that the chalice takes when it is formed embodies the formal cause.
The use of the chalice in the context of religious ceremonies is the embodiment of its final cause. Lastly, responsible
for manipulating the silver to create an actual chalice is the efficient cause. Given the chalice as an example,
Heidegger reconceives Aristotle’s causes into the four ways of being responsible. According to Heidegger
responsibility does not refer to accountability or creation; rather, it is what helps an object reach its full potential as a
functional object.
He does not consider the effective cause to be similar to the three other causes but as an essential idea to
understand the other causes as well as itself. The four causes are taken into account by another concept he calls the
bringing-forth or the taking of each of the causes with meticulous consideration to create the final product.
According to Heidegger, bringing -forth falls under two categories, namely POIESIS and PHYSIS.
Poiesis-is the bringing forth of an object into existence from creation or art, practiced by craftsmen and poets.
Physis- is the bringing forth of an object from nature, which is a self-producing process of coming into existence.
He states that technology comes from the Greek term “techmikon”, related to the Greek term “techne”.
Techne, as in technique, is both a skill of manufacture and arts. Furthermore, Heidegger states how Plato linked the
term techne to episteme from which the word “epistemology “stems”from. In this sense, techne means “know-how”
or is defined, in the widest sense, as one expertise in a particular field.
According to Heidegger, the act of bringing forth is grounded in the act of uncovering. In addition, he
clarifies that technology is not a mere means but rather a mode of revealing. Thus, the bringing forth of technology
brings what the Greek refer to as Alethia meaning unconcealment or truth. From here, Heidegger says that
technology is very distant from modern technology, as modern technology is disjointed from the idea of Alethia.
Given Heidegger’s chalice example, the silversmith, by virtue of his or her techne, brings together form,
matter, and function encompassing the idea of what a chalice is. He or she can uncover or reveal an actual chalice
from the silver that is “on its” way to existence. This is the essence of technology-a revealing of the truth. This is
where modern technology comes into objection. He compares a windmill, a familiar and older form of technology,
the windmill draws energy from the wind whereas a hydroelectric dam exploits and stores energy. In this sense,
modern technology challenges the planet’s resources, a concept embodied in Heidegger’s term of “challenging-
forth”.
Modern technology challenges nature in providing the energy that it needs. Heidegger uses the Rhine River
in Germany as an example. For an artist, the river is a source of poetic and philosophical inspiration. But once an
engineer builds a dam on the river, the river’s purpose changes and from that point onwards: it becomes a source of
energy.
While modern technology also employs aspects of uncolcealment and revealing, it does so differently,
compared to older forms. Modern technology turns the world into a “standing-reserve” a concept that means that
the world’s resources are not “good” on its own but are only “good for” something else. Modern technology is
focused on “setting-upon”, which challenges nature in providing the energy that it needs that delays nature’s
potential to be “revealed”.
There are two different ways modern technology challenges nature to provide energy. The first is how
modern technology unlocks the energy from the natural resources and exposes the object for whatever purposes it
may hold. The other is in how modern technology is able to maximize the use of a given object while using the bare
minimum expenditure. From here, what is gathered from setting-upon is unlocked and transformed through the
process of “ordering”. The transformed energy from “ordering” is stored and distributed as seen fit.
Heidegger questions the positions of humanity in the process of challenging nature. He asks how humanity
in the process of challenging nature. He asks how humanity is involved in the revealing process and to what extent it
can be done. This is answered with the idea that the standing-reserve comes from the potential energy produced and
reserved for purposes that either humans or tecehnology may change and manipulate for future use.
Heidegger reiterates that modern technology, as a revealing, is no mere human doing. Modern technology
challenges humanity to do something with nature-to manipulate nature by ordering and directing it to transform it
from being a standing -reserve into the revealing. He uses an example of how mountains unfold into mountain ranges
and how their gathering is called “gebirg” (mountain chain), as they too are ordered.
This challenging gather humanity into revealing the standing-reserve in what Heidegger call gestell or
enframing. The idea of enframing stems from what Heidegger refers to as the “frame of mind” that drives humans to
a precise scientific knowledge and renewed perception of the world. Another way to describe enframing is the
gathering of what humanity is -setting-upon and revealing that the essence of modern technology is not
technological. The parts that make up technological devices such as the batteries and processors of machines belong
to the technological. (Casas Science, Technology and Society pages 155-160).
The idea of what “a good life” is could always be traced to the classics of philosophy. In relation to this,
Antonia Macaro (2018) listed some components of a good life based on the writings of Aristotle. She provided
various criteria that may constitute a good life; success, material comfort, pleasure, relationships, reason and
virtues. Character and spirituality are equally important elements.
1. Success and material comfort- success is defined differently by different people. Dr. Ron Jenson’s book “
Make a life Not Just a living” discusses the common perceptions of individuals about a successful life. He
presented the 5p’s: power, prestige, pleasure, position, and prosperity, which are perceived to be the
components of a happy successful life.
2. Pleasure- is not the ultimate good, but it is good in moderation. It does not automatically translate to a
good life. The desire for pleasure is a form of hedonism, the view in which pleasure is the highest goal. This
self-focused pleasure is not a long-term happiness. The best kind of pleasure is derived from being involved
in some worthwhile activity. A good life is a balance between value and pleasure.
3. Relationships- are essential to a good life. Meaningful, pleasant relations with mutual admiration are
necessary in a good life. Cultivating good relationships within different aspects of one’s life contributes to
the quality of one’s life.
4. Reason and virtues- One of the elements of the ultimate good is reason. Theoretically, reason is the
contemplation of unchangeable truths. Practically, it is the capacity to make decisions in the sphere of
what can be changed. Theoretical and practical reasons are intellectual virtues that are central parts of the
good life. In order to flourish as human beings, the development of virtues of character includes learning to
act according to reason.
5. Character and spirituality- according to Dr. Ron Jenson (1995), an individual’s character is the root of his
or her inner strength. King Solomon, who led Israel, had authored the Book of Ecclesiastes in which he
stated that to fear God and keep His commandments are fundamental duties of man. These statements
encompass spirituality and character. King Solomon urges the cultivation of one’s character and spirituality,
which are essential elements to a good life.
Based on Hedonistic Theory, one’s good is a matter of how he or she experiences. It identifies self-
interest with happiness that hedonistic defines as the preference of pleasure and absence of pain.
Preference theory- a person’s “good” is what one wants.
Technological optimism is the view that technological improvements will sustain life as human
population continues to increase. In the book the year 2000 published in 1967 Herman Kahn and Anthony Wiener
listed 100 technological innovations that are likely to occur in the last quarter of the 20th century.
The study of genetics poses a threat to ethic. Pharmacogenetics become controversial in terms of ethical use.
Advanced DNA testing also poses both advantages and disadvantages.
The growth of Science and technology challenges society’s ability to understand and control its effects
on everyday life. People use diesel-powered automobiles and coal powered energy plants that release toxic fumes
greenhouse gases that are detrimental to human and environmental health. Dams are constructed for irrigation,
flood control, and power production, they also disrupt the natural ecosystem and displaced local communities like
in Chico River Dam, Kaliwa Low Dam in Rizal.
Agent Orange a Herbecide and defoliate chemical used during Vietnam War by the USA military to
destroy plant
based ecosystem in Vietnam territory. It damaged also the genes of human exposed to it resulting in genetic
deformities. Made the regeneration of forest difficult and almost impossible.
Computer and electronic surveillance system provide personal, institutional and homeland security but
posed threats to human privacy.
4. Prepare 20 items quiz with correct answer written in a long bond paper
5. Read the Universal Declaration of Human Right and “How are today’s Biggest tech trends
affecting our human rights by Ruth Hickin (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/12/how-
are-today-s-biggest-tech-trends-affecting-human-rights/). Explain how technology challenges
these human rights.
Prepared by:
Mrs. Violeta E. Sioson