International Economics!!!!!!!!!
International Economics!!!!!!!!!
INTRODUCTION
The exchange rate is the price of a unit of foreign currency in terms of the domestic
currency. In the Philippines, for instance, the exchange rate is conventionally expressed as
the value of one US dollar in peso equivalent.
The value of any particular currency is determined by market forces based on trade,
investment, tourism, and geo-political risk. Every time a tourist visits a country, for example,
he or she must pay for goods and services using the currency of the host country. Therefore,
a tourist must exchange the currency of his or her home country for the local currency.
Currency exchange of this kind is one of the demand factors for a particular currency.
Another important factor of demand occurs when a foreign company seeks to do business
with a company in a specific country. Usually, the foreign company will have to pay the local
company in their local currency. At other times, it may be desirable for an investor from one
country to invest in another, and that investment would have to be made in the local
currency as well. All of these requirements produce a need for foreign exchange and are the
reasons why foreign exchange markets are so large. (investopia.com)
In this paper the researchers attempt to show the impact of strengthening peso
against the US dollar and what are the consequences behind it. It also attempt to show
where should the government place itself when the opposing interest of the public are at
stake.
BACKGROUND
The Philippine peso has been one of the strongest currencies in Southeast Asian
Region for the past two year. It appreciated for an about 5.6 percent from year 2009 to
2010 where the exchange rate is 47.6372 to 45.1097 a dollar—that is based on the average
data from BSP. This appreciation may attributed to the increasing inflows of remittances
from the overseas Filipino workers (OFWs), the improvement in portfolio and direct
investment, the deterioration of United States’ dollar economy for the past two years and
the attractiveness of the Southeast Asian Region to the foreign investors.
In this situation, the government is stock between letting the peso appreciate for the
purpose of lower importation cost and lower debt services—or maintaining it at a lower
value for the sake of OFWs and export sector. According to Senator Ralph Recto, chairman
of the Senate Committee on ways and means, the Philippine peso could further appreciate
up to P34 a dollar this year (2011). Inflow of remittances will continue to be strong and the
outlook for foreign investments remains positive.
The exchange rate is important for several reasons: (1) it serves as the basic link
between the local and the overseas market for various goods, services and financial assets.
Using the exchange rate, we are able to compare prices of goods, services, and assets
quoted in different currencies. (2) exchange rate movements can affect actual inflation as
well as expectations about future price movements. Changes in the exchange rate tend to
directly affect domestic prices of imported goods and services. A stronger peso lowers the
peso prices of imported goods as well as import-intensive services such as transport,
thereby lowering the rate of inflation. (3) exchange rate movements can affect the country’s
external sector through its impact on foreign trade. An appreciation of the peso, for
instance, could lower the price competitiveness of our exports versus the products of those
competitor countries whose currencies have not changed in value. (4) the exchange rate
affects the cost of servicing (principal and interest payments) on the country’s foreign debt.
A peso appreciation reduces the amount of pesos needed to buy foreign exchange to pay
interest and maturing obligations.
Foreign exchange policy in the Philippines has evolved from a pegged system to a
floating rate regime over the last 50 years. The period of pegged exchange rate regime
witnessed an extensive use of a myriad of administrative rules that were set to restrict
access of Philippine residents and corporations to foreign currency. From 1949 to early
1970, foreign exchange policy was used to promote exports industries, to limit imports, and
to try to change the orientation of the Philippine economy from agricultural to agro-
industrial. Even after the floating rate system was adopted in 1970, it was not until late 1984
that the central bank stopped announcing a guiding rate and imposing a trading band.
Moreover, it was a decade hence yet before the watershed set of reforms was issued. In
1993, the BSP liberalized capital flows and implemented a comprehensive set of foreign
exchange market reforms. Today, even as there remain some prudential regulations with
respect to foreign currency transactions, market forces determine the exchange rate.
Furthermore, mechanisms to allow the economy to absorb shocks that a freely floating
currency entails have been the subject of recent economic discussions. (BSP, 2008)
September 1995 The Philippines acquired Article VIII status with the IMF with the lifting
of all restrictions on current account transactions.
July 1997 Asian currency and financial crisis emerged. The BSP implemented
measures to rationalize the rules and regulations governing non-trade
related FX transactions to restore stability in the FX market and mitigate
the impact of the Asian crisis on the economy.
December 1997 Circular 149 implemented the Currency Rate Risk Protection Program
(CRPP).
2 October 2006 A new peso-dollar trading platform was launched, replacing the
Philippine Dealing System in providing the main reference rate for
dollar-peso conversions.
2 April 2007 Circular 561 s. 2007, dated 8 March 2007, took effect. In the face of
strong inflows, the BSP liberalized the foreign exchange regulations to
allow greater market access to foreign exchange for outward
investment and over-the-counter transactions.
January 2008 The second phase of reforms in the foreign exchange regulatory
framework (Circular 590 dated 27 December 2007) was implemented.
These reforms focus mainly on promoting greater integration with
international capital markets, diversifying risk supportive of an
expanding economy with global linkages, and streamlining the
documentation and reporting requirements on the sale of FX by banks.
Source: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), Working Paper Series
I. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The general problem of the study, “The Philippine Peso-US Dollar Exchange Rate: The
Impact of Strengthening Currency” is to determine the impact of the appreciation of
Philippine peso during the year 2009-2010. Specifically, the problems are the following:
III. HYPOTHESES
The study “The Philippine Peso-US Dollar Exchange Rate: The Impact of
Strengthening Currency” limit its scope on Philippine peso against US dollar from year 2000
to 2010.
dollar. India’s steady economic growth offered several opportunities for foreign companies.
Between April 2006 and March 2007, FDI of $16 billion flowed to India.
Foreign currency reserves, gold, special drawing rights (SDRs), foreign investments as
well as the Reserve Position in the Fund (RPF) are main components of the Gross
International Reserves (GIR). The GIR constitutes the foreign assets valued mark-to-market,
which are readily available to and controlled by the BSP for direct financing of payments
imbalances and for managing the magnitude of such imbalances. The BSP estimates the
level of Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) remittances, which props up the country’s foreign
currency reserves. (BSP website)
The appreciation of Philippine peso against the US dollar affects the consumption of
Filipinos. Especially the families of overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) who receives
remittances coming from abroad—which are commonly dollar denominated.
According to BSP, the US dollar remittances of OFWs increase by 8.16% from 2009
up to 2010. On the year 2010, the overseas Filipino workers remittances reflect 29.55
percent of the Gross National Products (GNP).
According to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, on the year 2010 the peso appreciated at
an about 5.6% on average basis (see table 2). This means that the purchasing power of the
dollar remittances lower for an about 5.6% in the Philippines.
On the letter written by the Filipino Community in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to the
President in Malacañan in August 2006, they stated their predicament regarding
appreciation of Philippine peso against the US dollar: (a) the salaries remained the same
while the cost of living have increased, which means less income to be available for
remittances; which worsen when peso appreciated from Php55 to Php45 versus US dollar.
(b) the continued appreciation effectively reduced the value of remittances at an average
18%.
2004 56.040
2005 55.086
2006 51.314
2007 46.148
2008 44.475
2009 47.637
2010 45.110
Source: BSP (edited)
The table above shows how much a dollar worth in peso term during the year 2000
up to 2010.
B. Investment
Peso strengthen. Just like the OFWs, investments from foreigners improve and help peso
appreciation and generally the economy as a whole. Having superb Dollar inflow allows the
BSP to increase international reserves of debt curbing down Peso devaluation and aiding to
Peso appreciation.
Registration of inward foreign investments with the BSP is voluntary. It entitles the
investor or his representative to buy foreign exchange from authorized agent banks or their
subsidiary/affiliate foreign exchange corporations for repatriation of capital and remittance
of dividends/profits/earnings that accrue on the registered investment.
For the first two months of the year, transactions netted an inflow of US$727 million,
135.6 percent higher than the figure recorded for the comparable period in 2010.
Registered investments reached US$3.0 billion, or an increase of 179.3 percent from last
year’s performance. Investments in PSE-listed shares of US$1.4 billion exceeded the 2010
figure by 68.3 percent. Major beneficiaries were banks (US$336 million); holding firms
(US$248 million); utility companies (US$241 million); property firms (US$182 million); and
telecommunication companies (US$167 million).
Portfolio funds have also been re-rating Asia as an investment destination and their
flows have reinforced the uptrend in Asian currencies. With developed markets weighed
down with debt and facing years of sluggish growth, fund managers are looking into Asia,
citing the region’s fast growth rates and strong corporate balance sheets. (BSP, issuances)
Asia is set to continue being a strong destination of portfolio flows over the coming
months. The high Asian equity correlation with local currencies will help fuel further gains in
the Philippine peso and other Asian currencies.
C. Government Spending
We all know that the government’s responsibility is the acquisition of goods and
services for current use to directly satisfy individual or collective needs of the members of
the community. They allocate the fund for Personal Services, Maintenance and Other
Operating Expenses, Capital Outlays and Net Lending, Public Infrastructure and effectively
marginalized resources for the poor. But it’s not that easy because the government must be
aware of those risks that might affect their expenditures. One of it is the Philippine Peso
condition in exchange rate – if the currency appreciates or devaluate. Now therefore, how
thus the exchange rate may affect the government spending?
Paying Philippines’ debt will affect our Government’s spending. In fact, based on the
data from Bureau of Treasury, more than 77.6 percent of the P104.4 billion increase in the
2011 budget came from the huge P80.99 billion rise in interest payment for government’s
spending. The Aquino administration is proposed interest payment of P357.09 billion in the
2011 budget, or 21.7 percent of its planned spending program. But the total debt burden for
this year could actually reach P823.27 billion. Thus, debt burden represents 38.9 percent of
what the Aquino administration is willing to spend this year.
If peso appreciates, it has a good impact in our external debt since our debt will
decrease in peso terms. We will pay less and that will affect our spending. The remaining
money that allocated for payment of external debt will be used for government spending.
More resources are available to spend for social and economic development of our country.
On the other hand, peso depreciates has a bad effect. Our debt will increase so we will pay
more, that is, in peso terms. Little amount of money will be allocate for government
spending. The government will force to minimize their expenditure. Such a heavy debt
burden means fewer resources are available to spend for social and economic services badly
needed by the people.
Let’s now look at the effect of peso condition in trade. Strong peso has a negative
effect in exporters. They will lose income since there was less peso in exchange of their
dollar earnings or a strong peso translates to lesser value for their dollar-denominated
revenues. Prices of their products may also become less competitive in the world market.
The smaller the earnings or profit of exporters, the smaller tax they will pay in the
government. That will affect the governments’ spending. If there are small fund comes from
tax, government need to minimize their expenditure. On the other hand, strong peso has a
positive effect on importers. They will pay less in foreign products. They will earn more and
pay more tax. Again, the tax will proceed in government’s fund so more tax, more funds that
government may spend for the people’s benefits.
Weak peso has good effects in exporters. Prices of their products become more
competitively in the world market. They will receive more peso in exchange of their earnings
so they will pay more tax. More tax, more funds that government may spend for the
benefits of the people. When peso depreciates importers will force to pay more for foreign
products. That is bad for them and for government spending. Since the smaller the earnings
or profit of importers, the smaller tax they will pay. Government will force to minimize their
expenditures.
As we observed, peso condition has different effects in different factors. That is the
reason why it’s hard for the government to ask the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) to
intervene the strengthening peso. We cannot easily believe that a strong peso means a
strong republic. So government must look at different factors and learn before engaging the
country in different risk. As we also observed, the effect of peso condition in the sources of
government funds is the same in the impact of peso condition in government spending. If
the effect in the sources of funds is negative, the impact in the government spending is also
negative. When the effect is positive, the impact in government spending is also positive.
Since World War II, the Philippines experienced frequent trade deficits, aggravated
by inflationary pressures. Deficits were counterbalanced by US government expenditures,
transfer of payments from abroad, official loans (US Export-Import Bank, IBRD, and private
US banks), net inflow of private investment, tourist receipts, remittances from Filipino
workers overseas, and contributions from the IMF.
In 1996, trade liberalization policies helped to push imports up by 22% while exports
rose by only 18%. The result was a widening trade deficit that amounted to 13% of GDP.
Foreign investment in the stock market and remittances from overseas workers helped to
offset the deficit and avert a balance-of payments crisis. In 1998, the Philippines recorded a
trade surplus at about 2% of GNP in the current account due to high electronics exports and
low imports due to the devaluation of the peso. This was the first surplus in 12 years.
Merchandise exports, in double digits through most of the 1990s, slowed to a single-
digit growth pace in 2000, reflecting fewer export receipts from electronics and
telecommunications parts and equipment. This decline was attributed by the electronics
industry to weaker prices for maturing products and technologies, and to the decline in
electronic industry investments from the 1994–97 boom years (when investment averaged
$1.5 billion a year).
D. Import
An emerging market, the Philippine economy continues to recover from the political
instability of the 1980s, a series of natural disasters in the 1990s. Many of the products
being imported are for improvement of the country's production capabilities. The
development of industry has been hindered by such factors as electric power shortages and
a still developing infrastructure.
The Philippine government has taken several significant steps to reduce bureaucratic
regulations and foster competition. In recent years it has revised and enacted tax, labor,
health, safety environmental and other laws and policies with the aim of regulating industry.
Year Imports
(Billion US
dollars)
2001 35
2002 30
2003 33.5
2004 35.97
2005 37.5
2006 42.66
2007 51.6
2008 57.56
2009 60.78
2010 46.39
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Source: CIA World Factbook - Unless otherwise noted, information in this page is accurate as
of March 11, 2010
The table and graph above show that Year 2009 has the highest imports recorded
with $60.78B. On the other hand, the lowest imports recorded in the past ten years was on
2002 having $30B.
This entry provides the total US dollar amount of merchandise imports on a c.i.f.
(cost, insurance, and freight) or f.o.b. (free on board) basis. These figures are calculated on
an exchange rate basis. i.e. not in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms.
E. Export
As a developing country, the Philippines really does not have much choice in the
matter. It needs to increase its export volume as a matter of economic survival, and within
its national context, only the public sector has the resources to provide export promotion
services to small and medium-sized businesses in a cost-effective way. It was evident by the
end of the 1970s, that the institutional reforms did not go far enough in achieving the major
objectives of development.
Typical of most small developing country trades, Philippines export trade has been
characterized by a high degree of commodity and geographic concentration. As late as 1970,
ten principal traditional export commodities comprised three quarters of total exports
value. The first three top dollar earners (sugar, logs and lumber and copper concentrates)
easily accounted for a little more than half of total export earnings.
A definite shift to export promotion was observed in the decade of the 1970s. In
spite of the export orientation reflected in exchange rate and industrial promotion policies,
the structure of protection accorded by tariff policy remained basically inward looking. The
general picture that emerges from the above discussion is that while foreign exchange,
trade and industrial incentive policies in the seventies had taken an unmistakable shift
toward export promotion, they had stopped short of completely eliminating the biases
against export sales.
Philippines’ export partners are US 15.35%, Japan 14.19%, China 13.19%, Singapore
9.44%, Hong Kong 9%, South Korea 5.12%, Germany 4.1% (2009).
Year Exports
(Billion US
dollars)
2001 2.677
2002 2.929
2003 2.748
2004 3.303
2005 3.431
2006 4.243
2007 3.899
2008 4.081
2009 3.189
2010 4.288*
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Source: CIA World Factbook - Unless otherwise noted, information in this page is accurate
as of March 11, 2010
The graph and table show the Philippine exports to all countries. The highest export
reported in the past ten years was during on 2010 having S4.288B while the lowest was on
2003 having S2.73B
A strong peso is generally favorable to the economy as a whole but there are certain
sectors of the industry and society that are affected by a strong peso. Weakened by a strong
peso since their good would become offensive since the peso appreciates which makes
them less competitive in the export market. Although may be affected, all is not lost since
there are financial solutions to at least mitigate the handicap they are facing because
exporters could enter into hedging agreement or derivatives where they could enter into a
contract to protect them from the Peso appreciation. The tourism industry weakens as well
since a strong peso makes staying for a vacation in a country would make it more expensive.
The effect of a strong peso on tourism industry also affects the hotel industry since it is
some what related as a strong tourism industry means more bookings with hotels for a
place to stay. An ironic advantage of a strong peso is that the beneficiaries of the OFWs who
contribute significantly in making the peso strong, get less of the remittances that their
relatives send them since the dollar loses its purchasing power by the peso appreciation.
And finally, in sector which for us is really getting the worst out of the situations are the
domestic producers since a strong peso appreciates thus making it purchase imported goods
more. The industry is for direct investments.
The negative aspects of a strengthening peso is very much in the news, what with
OFW families getting into financial trouble, and exporters complaining about their products
getting to be too expensive for foreign buyers. What often gets overlooked is the fact that
the Peso appreciation also has a positive side, and if one takes a good look at this, it is at
least equally important as the negative side to this trend.
Increases in the world market prices of imported goods have lesser effect. Oil prices have
shot up in dollar terms, and thanks to the increased value of the peso, the actual effect on
the prices of oil products have not been as much as otherwise would have been the case.
The same could be said of wheat prices, etc. which have also risen.
Dollar-denominated foreign debts can be repaid with less pesos. The Philippine
government has saved billions of pesos as a result of the dollar’s drop in value. Philippine
companies with foreign debts have likewise benefited.
Capital flight from the Philippines has lessened. The strengthening peso means that it is no
longer a wise financial move to move funds to a foreign dollar account. It would be much
more profitable to keep the money in pesos. At the same time, there is some kind of poetic
justice that corrupt officials with funds abroad suffer from a severe cut in the value of their
“loot”.
Skyrocketing real estate prices would be dampened. Many Overseas Filipinos (mostly in the
dollar area) have driven up prices of real estate throughout the country. The decreased
value of their dollars may result in the cooling down of the buying frenzy for land by OFs.
Increased attention to the domestic market from investors and (former) exporters. Some
exporters are coping with the decreased demand for their products in the US by either
shifting to other countries or to selling domestically. The increased supply of products to the
domestic market would help to lessen prices and improve the product quality of
domestically available goods. At the same time, the value of the local market for foreign
investors has increased. Since the peso’s value has increased, the potential sales and profits
offered by the domestic market has increased in terms of dollars.
Lower interest rates. The steadily depreciating dollar is pushing the US Fed to decrease
their interest rates – in response, countries like the Philippines decrease their interest rates
accordingly, in order to avoid the interest rate differential to get too high. Low interest rates
are good because it stimulates business, and also consumer spending, both of which are
good for the economy.
Lower cost of imported capital goods. For example, the peso value of new airplanes is now
much less than it was even a year ago. This is the same for other items e.g.
heavyconstruction equipment, computers, etc. This would help stimulate the economy, and
could also lead to decreased prices for consumers.
F. Debt Payment
As we all know, Philippine peso had appreciated in these past few years against the
US dollar and implies high advantage to our economy. One of the advantage of the peso
appreciation is the lower debt servicing, in which, it lessen the external debt of the country.
As of December 2010, the National Government debt was recorded at P4, 718
billion, lower by P1 billion from end November 2010 level of P4, 719 billion. Of the total
debt, P2, 000 billion or 42.4% is owed to foreign creditors and P2, 718 billion or 57.6% to
domestic creditors.
The decrease in NG’s foreign debt of P2 billion from the level as of end November
2010 was brought about by the P5 billion net repayment and P16B appreciation of the peso
against the US dollar. This however was partially offset by the P18 billion net appreciation of
the third currencies against the US dollar and P1 billion adjustment resulting from late
receipt of notices of availment.
The domestic debt increased by P1 billion from the previous month’s level resulting
from the net issuance of government securities by NG.
On the other hand, the contingent debt of the National Government, composed
mainly of guarantees issued by the National Government, increased to 550 billion, lower by
P10 billion from end November 2010 level of P560 billion. The decrease in domestic
contingent obligations was due to the misclassification of the P12 billion HGC guaranteed
PAGIBIG bonds as NG direct guaranteed loan. The increase in foreign contingent obligations
was due to the combined effects of the P3 billion appreciation of the peso against the US
dollar, P2 billion net repayment and P7 billion net appreciation of the third currencies
against the US dollar. (Bureau of Treasury, Press Release)
One of the key reasons why the Philippine currency had experienced a significant
increase on its value during the last two years was because of the increasing number of
Filipino dollar remittances from abroad.
The strengthening of the value of Philippine peso during 2008 was attributed to the
recession that the America had experienced during the last quarter of that year. However,
the Philippine currency had experienced depreciation on the year 2009; because that is the
year the country receive the impact of recession from 2008 that America had experienced.
This has same effect on the ASEAN region where the Philippine is belong; their currency had
also experienced depreciation.
The Philippine had set a cushioning effect against the recession due to its dollar
remittances coming from OFW’s in different part of the work.
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) maintains a floating exchange rate system.
Exchange rates are determined on the basis of supply and demand in the foreign exchange
market. The role of the BSP in the foreign exchange market is principally to ensure orderly
conditions in the market. The market-determination of the exchange rate is consistent with
the Government’s commitment to market-oriented reforms and outward-looking strategies
of achieving competitiveness through price stability and efficiency.
Remittances from overseas Filipinos workers (OF) coursed through banks continued
to show strength at the start of 2011, rising year-on-year by 7.6 percent to US$1.48 billion,
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) Governor Amando M. Tetangco, Jr. announced. This
positive development reflected increased remittances from both sea-based and land-based
workers, with their transfers rising by 13.3 percent and 6.2 percent, respectively.
Remittance flows into the country remained resilient on the back of sustained
demand for skilled overseas Filipino workers in different destinations worldwide. The
Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) reported that, of the total approved
99,926 job orders for land-based workers for the period 1 January - 28 February 2011,
more than two-fifths represented processed job orders for service, production, and
professional, technical and related workers. The processed job orders are intended for the
manpower requirements in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Taiwan, and Kuwait. In its market
update, the POEA stated that the Department of Labor and Employment's Philippine
Overseas Labor Office in Rome, Italy, reported that a new quota decree has been signed in
November 2010, which will allow the entry of 100,000 foreign workers in Italy, of which
4,000 new hires are allotted to the Philippines. Meanwhile, the POEA also reported that the
country's seafaring industry is aggressively targeting to capture at least 50 percent of the
global requirement for seafarers in the future. To achieve this, the seafaring industry has
invested in world-class training modules and facilities to upgrade the quality of skills of
Filipino seafarers.
The peso strengthened in the first trading day of the week as beliefs that the
economy would grow in 2011 given its positive fundamentals offset concerns over the ill-
effects of adverse offshore developments, such as the earthquake in Japan and lingering
unrest in selected countries in the Middle East and North Africa.
The local currency closed at 43.59 against the US dollar on Monday, up by 6 centavos
from Friday’s finish of 43.65.
Intraday high hit 43.56:$1, while intraday low settled at 43.72:$1. Volume of trade inched up
to $1.023 billion from $772.28 million previously.
Traders said external factors had been weighing down on the peso and other Asian
currencies. Nonetheless, they said, the peso has been expected not to depreciate and that
domestic factors have beefed up sentiment on the economy.
Traders and other economic players still expect the Philippines to post a decent
growth this year, aided by remittances and improving business and consumer sentiment.
In 2010, the economy grew by 7.3 percent, the fastest pace registered in over three
decades. (inquire.net)
IX. GENERALIZATION
The study, “The Philippine Peso-US dollar Exchange Rate: The impact of
Strengthening Currency”, aimed the following objectives: 1) to determine the economic
impact of the appreciation of Philippine peso; 2) determine the effect of the appreciation of
Philippine peso (consumption, investment, government spending, import, export, debt
servicing); 3)to determine the reasons behind the appreciation of the Philippine peso during
2009-2010; 4) to determine the role of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) on the Foreign
Exchange Market; 5) to determine the future movement of Philippine peso against the US
dollar. The significance of this study was to determine the impact of peso appreciation on
the economy. It shows the effect on different sectors of the economy.
It attempts to show the impact of strengthening peso against the US dollar and what
are the consequences behind it. It also attempt to show where should the government place
itself when the opposing interest of the public are at stake through Bangko Sentral ng
Pilipinas.
Based on the date gathered, the first hypothesis is accepted. The effects of
appreciation have a great impact consumption, government spending, investment, import-
export and debt servicing. There were two impacts on consumption, first is the value of
imported commodities are cheaper in terms of peso. Second, the purchasing power of dollar
remittances will decrease. In government spending, If peso appreciates, it has a good impact
in our external debt since our debt will decrease. We will pay less and that will affect our
spending. The remaining money that allocated for payment of external debt will be used for
government spending. More resources are available to spend for social and economic
development of our country. Peso appreciation will cause the exports become less
competitive in the international market that will result to less revenues in terms of exports.
Imported products will become cheaper that can cause the people to purchase more of it.
Another advantage of a strong Philippine Peso is that it would reflect a robust economy for
the country which could leverage itself to attract foreign investors in the country which
could provide significant inflows for investments to the country furthering improving the
economy. A positive outlook is very important to a country to seek investors to show
confidence in investing to country since their outlook would be one of the considerations
investors would consider. One of the advantage of the peso appreciation is the lower debt
servicing, in which, it lessen the external debt of the country.
The second hypothesis is also accepted. Philippine peso appreciation was caused by
several factors such as the robust economy of the Philippine as well as the increasing
amount of remittances from the overseas Filipino workers (OFWs).
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas has the role of maintaining the inflation and has the
power to intervene in Foreign Exchange market. It is the tool being used by the government
in monetary policy.
Based on the information that was released by the BSP the peso is expected to
appreciate, prior to the events that struck one of the major Economic Partner of the
Philippines—Japan—and prior to the political instability from Arab nations, which is one of
the major source of dollar remittances of the country.
X. RECOMMENDATION
The researchers’ believe that the government should maintain the peso appreciate
so that it will lessen the burden of paying excessive debt--principal and interest. And to
maintain the prices of the commodity that are being imported at a low price, such as oil
which is vital in the daily economic activity and other commodity that is not produce in the
county.
On the other hand, the government should provide a OFWs remittance stabilization
fund—from the money that the government had saved in debt servicing—that pegged the
exchange rate between peso and dollar, because OFWs’ remittances are crucial in
maintaining the high value of the peso against the dollar and the effects that it will brought
to the economy. .
We cannot easily believe that a strong peso means a strong republic. So government
must look at different factors and learn before engaging the country in different risk. As we
also observed, the effect of peso condition in the sources of government funds is the same
in the impact of peso condition in government spending. If the effect in the sources of funds
is negative, the impact in the government spending is also negative. When the effect is
positive, the impact in government spending is also positive.
XI. REFERENCES
1. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. (2008). Adjustments in the Face of Peso Volatility:
Perspective from the Past and Policy Directions.: Retrieved February 21, 2011
retrieved from
http://www.bsp.gov.ph/downloads/Publications/2008/WPS200802.pdf
2. http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/08/what-is-foreign-exchange.asp
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_exchange_market
4. http://www.bsp.gov.ph/financial/forex.asp
5. http://business.inquirer.net/money/breakingnews/view/20110314-325428/Peso-
rises-against-dollar-as-positive-view-of-local-economy-stays
6. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?
articleId=565592&publicationSubCategoryId=66
7. Monetary Stability Sector of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (2006).The Exchange
Rate. Retrieved from
http://www.bsp.gov.ph/dowloads/publication/FAQs/exchangerate.pdf