Unit 2 Just in Time
Unit 2 Just in Time
This type of inventory management provides many benefits, but is not without its
downsides, and relies heavily on factors such as a strong, fast and efficient network of
suppliers.
The JIT inventory system represents a shift away from the older "just-in-case" strategy,
in which producers carried much larger inventories of stock and raw goods, in case they
needed to produce more units because of higher demand.
News about the process and success of JIT/TPS reached Western shores in 1977 with
implementations in the U.S. and other developed countries beginning in 1980.
Toyota and JIT manufacturing will succeed as long as the company maintains a steady
production rate, with high-quality workmanship and no machine breakdowns at the plant
that could stall production. Additionally, it needs reliable suppliers that can always
deliver parts quickly, and the ability to efficiently assemble machines that put together
its vehicles.
Potential Risks
JIT inventories can bring about disruptions in the supply chain. It only takes one supplier
of raw materials who has a breakdown and cannot deliver the goods on time to shut
down a manufacturer's entire production process. A customer order for goods that
surpasses the company's forecasted expectations may cause parts shortages that delay
the delivery of finished products to all customers.
Kanban (Japanese for sign) is an inventory control system used in just-in-time (JIT)
manufacturing to track production and order new shipments of parts and materials. Kanban was
developed by Taiichi Ohno, an industrial engineer at Toyota, and uses visual cues to prompt the
action needed to keep a process flowing.
Kanban (Japanese for sign) is an inventory control system used in just-in-time (JIT)
manufacturing to track production and order new shipments of parts and materials. Kanban was
developed by Taiichi Ohno, an industrial engineer at Toyota, and uses visual cues to prompt the
action needed to keep a process flowing.
This situation could have devastated Toyota's supply line. Fortunately, one of Aisin's
suppliers was able to retool and start manufacturing the necessary P-valves after just
two days.
Nevertheless, the fire cost Toyota nearly 16 billion yen in lost revenue and 70,000
cars.1 The problem trickled through to other suppliers for Toyota, as well. Some
suppliers were forced to shut down because the auto manufacturer didn't need their
parts to complete any cars on the assembly line.