2019 Sample ENG Paper2
2019 Sample ENG Paper2
Introduction
Level 5 exemplar 1
Level 5 exemplar 2
Level 4 exemplar 1
Level 4 exemplar 2
Level 3 exemplar 1
Level 3 exemplar 2
Level 2 exemplar 1
Level 2 exemplar 2
Level 1 exemplar 1
Level 1 exemplar 2
INTRODUCTION
There are four papers in this subject. This set of exemplars is selected from candidates’ scripts of
Paper 2 to illustrate the typical performance standards at different levels.
It is advisable to read this set of exemplars together with the question papers and the marking
schemes in order to understand the requirements of the questions and the marking criteria. The
question papers and the marking schemes are published in the 2019 HKDSE Question Papers (with
marking schemes and comments on candidates’ performance).
2
Level 5 exemplar 1
Part A
3
Level 5 exemplar 1
Part A
4
Level 5 exemplar 1
Part A
5
Level 5 exemplar 1
Part B Question 2
6
Level 5 exemplar 1
Part B Question 2
7
Level 5 exemplar 1
Part B Question 2
8
Level 5 exemplar 1
Part B Question 2
9
Level 5 exemplar 1
Part B Question 2
10
Level 5 exemplar 1
Comments
Content
- For Part A, ideas are varied, well supported and relevant. Personal details provided are very vivid.
- For Part B, many relevant points are made, e.g. benefits (increased competitiveness, strengthen
international status), challenges (lost opportunities for locals, lower quality of life) and ways (limit the
number of international talent, training).
Language
- Language is highly accurate, appropriate and idiomatic, with only minor slips.
- Vocabulary is wide and appropriately used, e.g. geography specific words ‘field trip, map interpretation’ to
describe geography lessons; ‘international status’, new source of labour, ‘mitigate negative effects’ to
explain abstract concepts in Part B.
- Register, tone and style are appropriate to the genre and text-type.
Organisation
- The overall structure is coherent and the text is organised extremely effectively.
11
Level 5 exemplar 2
Part A
12
Level 5 exemplar 2
Part A
13
Level 5 exemplar 2
Part A
14
Level 5 exemplar 2
Part B Question 3
15
Level 5 exemplar 2
Part B Question 3
16
Level 5 exemplar 2
Part B Question 3
17
Level 5 exemplar 2
Part B Question 3
18
Level 5 exemplar 2
Comments
Content
- The first entry in Part A is summary of things learned in the Visual Arts elective. The second entry
recounts the friendships of classmates in 6C using short anecdotes.
- In Part B, arguments about why social media platforms do not encourage rational debate are presented
with supporting examples, e.g. users posting comments about the police with no accountability for their
words or actions.
Language
- A wide range of accurate sentence structures is used, with few grammatical errors.
- Collocation is generally natural and used to good effect, e.g. ‘keyboard warriors’, ‘loopholes’, ‘fierce
debate’.
Organisation
19
Level 4 exemplar 1
Part A
20
Level 4 exemplar 1
Part A
21
Level 4 exemplar 1
Part A
22
Level 4 exemplar 1
Part B Question 7
23
Level 4 exemplar 1
Part B Question 7
24
Level 4 exemplar 1
Part B Question 7
25
Level 4 exemplar 1
Part B Question 7
26
Level 4 exemplar 1
Part B Question 7
27
Level 4 exemplar 1
Comments
Content
- In the first entry for Part A, there are some interesting self-reflections (e.g. regret about not concentrating
on lessons in the past). In the second entry, the remarks on how some classmates offered help to overcome
difficulties are well written.
- In Part B, the speech covers a number of areas including what criticism is, how it can have a negative
effect, how to give it and how to respond to it.
- An awareness of audience is evident, particularly in how the speech addresses members of the art club.
Language
- There is a range of accurate sentence structures and vocabulary which fits the context.
Organisation
- There is a lack of paragraphing in Part A but this does not affect comprehension.
- The text flows quite well, with the passage of time in the first entry and the justification in the second
entry.
- A short and clear opening in Parts A and B gives a preview of the important ideas to follow.
28
Level 4 exemplar 2
Part A
29
Level 4 exemplar 2
Part A
30
Level 4 exemplar 2
Part A
31
Level 4 exemplar 2
Part B Question 8
32
Level 4 exemplar 2
Part B Question 8
33
Level 4 exemplar 2
Part B Question 8
34
Level 4 exemplar 2
Part B Question 8
35
Level 4 exemplar 2
Comments
Content
- Some specific examples are used to support ideas (e.g. in Part A, practical experiences learnt from the visit
to HKMA).
- There are some irrelevant details in Part A, e.g. the arrangements for the dance competition, types of
economics. In Part B, ideas are relevant but sometimes too general as a description for the ideas in the
posters.
- Awareness of audience is present, and there are some touching memories conveyed in Part A.
Language
- Grammar is mainly accurate but there are some minor problems related to collocation and verbs.
- Vocabulary is moderately wide and used appropriately, with some examples of more sophisticated lexis.
- Register, tone and style are mostly appropriate to the text type.
Organisation
- The ending successfully direct readers’ attention back to the purpose for writing.
36
Level 3 exemplar 1
Part A
37
Level 3 exemplar 1
Part A
38
Level 3 exemplar 1
Part A
39
Level 3 exemplar 1
Part B Question 4
40
Level 3 exemplar 1
Part B Question 4
41
Level 3 exemplar 1
Part B Question 4
42
Level 3 exemplar 1
Comments
Content
- Ideas are all relevant and followed by some elaboration which helps address the question directly.
- Simple reasons are given, e.g. in Part A, why the writer enjoyed studying the subject and why good
relationships is the thing he/she misses most; in Part B, what caused the incident and reactions of people
watching the game and the parents of the players.
Language
- The use of a rhetorical question at the beginning of the first entry in Part A grabs readers’ attention.
- Most sentences are simple with occasional attempts to use more complex structures.
- There are some weaknesses in grammar in relation to verb form, passive/active voice, tense, agreement,
articles etc. but overall clarity is not really affected.
Organisation
- The whole text is quite easy to follow, with simple connectives used appropriately.
43
Level 3 exemplar 2
Part A
44
Level 3 exemplar 2
Part A
45
Level 3 exemplar 2
Part A
46
Level 3 exemplar 2
Part B Question 9
47
Level 3 exemplar 2
Part B Question 9
48
Level 3 exemplar 2
Part B Question 9
49
Level 3 exemplar 2
Comments
Content
- Interesting events are given in Part A, e.g. why the writer misses his/her teacher most, though some
reasons mentioned are not logical (e.g. reading famous writers’ work leads to achievement in the subject).
- In Part B, there are recognizable elements of a story: characterization (e.g. Tortoise was afraid of being
last, Hare was nervous), conflict (e.g. started to rain like cats and dogs), theme (e.g. cooperation and
friendship).
- There are examples of creativity and imagination shown, e.g. Hare picking up the Tortoise and jumping
over the contestants, Tortoise pushing the tired Hare; use of quotations to express dialogue etc.
- There is a message given at the end of the story but it is bit unclear.
Language
- There are some successful attempts to use more complex sentences as the candidate tries to express more
sophisticated opinions.
- There are mistakes in spelling, agreement, collocation, etc. but comprehension is still possible.
Organisation
- In Part B, simple cohesive ties are used to link ideas but it is difficult to follow the dense plot as the range
of cohesive devices used is quite limited and this affects the overall coherence of the text.
50
Level 2 exemplar 1
Part A
51
Level 2 exemplar 1
Part A
52
Level 2 exemplar 1
Part B Question 3
53
Level 2 exemplar 1
Part B Question 3
54
Level 2 exemplar 1
Comments
Content
- There are some examples of relevant content but ideas are not easy to follow.
- The second paragraph in Part A and most of the ideas in Part B do not directly address the question, e.g.
discussion is about benefits of social media rather than how social media encourages public debate.
Language
- There are some attempts to use more sophisticated words but also evidence of wrong word choice.
- There are attempts to use more complex sentences though frequent grammatical mistakes affect
comprehensibility.
Organisation
- For Part A, the opening and ending are appropriate in both entries. For Part B, the introduction is closely
adapted from the prompt.
- Some cohesive devices are used coherence is limited e.g. In Part A the use of the pronoun ‘you’, and the
switch from ‘we’ to ‘you’, are confusing.
55
Level 2 exemplar 2
Part A
56
Level 2 exemplar 2
Part A
57
Level 2 exemplar 2
Part B Question 5
58
Level 2 exemplar 2
Part B Question 5
59
Level 2 exemplar 2
Part B Question 5
60
Level 2 exemplar 2
Comments
Content
- For Part A, most ideas are relevant but unnecessary repetition is found in the first and second paragraphs.
Ideas in the second entry are relevant but they relate only weakly to what the writer will miss most.
- For Part B, the candidate tries to show how TV and Movies and Music and Concerts are the best way to
get information about popular culture. As a source, these are broad categories and ideas are not well
developed.
- Likewise in Part A, there is no identification of the people mentioned, which makes the description
seemingly generic.
Language
- Meaning is sometimes affected by errors of spelling, part of speech, tense, collocation, etc.
Organisation
- Links between sentences are rather weak, making ides disconnected and affecting coherence.
61
Level 1 exemplar 1
Part A
62
Level 1 exemplar 1
Part A
63
Level 1 exemplar 1
Part B Question 6
64
Level 1 exemplar 1
Part B Question 6
65
Level 1 exemplar 1
Comments
Content
- Some parts do not seem to be relevant e.g. the time taken to answer maths questions, ‘chocolate inclease
curry’.
- ‘This is a not traditional film’ is one of the few relevant points in Part B.
- Some ideas are developed but most are unclear and difficult to comprehend.
Language
- There are many errors in sentence structure, spelling and parts of speech, causing confusion.
Organisation
- There is some evidence of an attempt to organise ideas with simple discourse markers.
66
Level 1 exemplar 2
Part A
67
Level 1 exemplar 2
Part A
68
Level 1 exemplar 2
Part B Question 9
69
Level 1 exemplar 2
Part B Question 9
70
Level 1 exemplar 2
Comments
Content
- In Part A, the first entry focuses on the teacher instead of the subject while the second entry is rather short.
- In Part B, the story does not depict the tortoise and the hare racing as a team. There is also no message
expressed at the end of the story.
Language
Organisation
- Long sentences give rise to problems in organisation, e.g. the second paragraph is a single sentence.
- Simple discourse markers make understanding easier, though some connectives are wrongly used.
71