0% found this document useful (0 votes)
135 views

Rubric For The Colloquium in Research in Daily Life 1: Criteria GN Score and Comment/S

This rubric outlines criteria for evaluating a colloquium presentation on research in daily life. It assesses background of the study (20%), review of related literature (20%), statement of the problem (20%), method and design (20%), and objectives and significance of the study (20%). For each criterion, it provides descriptors for performance at mastery, proficient, approaching proficient, and emergent levels. The rubric will be used to score presentations and provide comments to improve future research colloquiums.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
135 views

Rubric For The Colloquium in Research in Daily Life 1: Criteria GN Score and Comment/S

This rubric outlines criteria for evaluating a colloquium presentation on research in daily life. It assesses background of the study (20%), review of related literature (20%), statement of the problem (20%), method and design (20%), and objectives and significance of the study (20%). For each criterion, it provides descriptors for performance at mastery, proficient, approaching proficient, and emergent levels. The rubric will be used to score presentations and provide comments to improve future research colloquiums.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

RUBRIC FOR THE COLLOQUIUM IN RESEARCH IN DAILY LIFE 1 11-A

2 – Approaching GN SCORE AND DATE OF DEFENSE


Criteria 4 – Mastery Level 3 – Proficient Level 1 – Emergent Level
AND TIME
Proficient Level COMMENT/S
1
Clearly explains the
There is an 2
issue or No specific area of
explanation to the
phenomenon to subject, issue,
Background of Somewhat explains the area of the study but 3
studied with all its phenomenon is
the Study issue or phenomenon to fails to clearly explain
parameters and a presented making
(20%) clear explanation the
be studied. the issue or
the study irrelevant
4
phenomenon being
scope of the study and invalid.
studied. 5
was chosen.
6
Clearly indicates to a
Clearly indicates the little degree the scope No indication of a clear 1
Clearly indicates the scope
scope and purpose of and purpose of scope and purpose of
and purpose of the review 2
the review and includes the review and includes the review and no
and includes a sufficient
a sufficient balanced a sufficient balanced balanced coverage of
Review of coverage of what is
balanced coverage of what
coverage of what is what is available. No 3
is available; however, there
Related available. Also includes available and fails to inclusion of any most
is inconsistency in providing
Literature the most recent and attempt to include the recent and relevant 4
most recent and relevant
relevant studies and most recent and studies and no
(20%) studies and enough
enough materials to
materials to show the
relevant studies and enough materials to 5
show the development enough materials to show the development
development and
and limitations in this show the development and limitations in this
limitations in this area
area and limitations in this area 6
area

1
Presents questions
Presents questions
Presents some but are not
that are relevant 2
questions that are necessarily
to the discussion No questions are
relevant to the relevant to the
Statement of in the introduction presented that
discussion in the discussion in the
the Problem part and focuses establishes the 3
introduction part and introduction part
(20%) major rationale of the
focuses major and focuses major
issue/phenomeno proposed study.
issue/phenomenon issue/phenomenon 4
n that will be
that will be studied. that will be
studied.
studied.
5

1
RUBRIC FOR THE COLLOQUIUM IN RESEARCH IN DAILY LIFE 1 11-A
6

Presents appropriate 2
Presents appropriate Research method,
research method Presents appropriate
and design how the research method and
research method and design, procedure, 3
Method and design but the no and analysis is
data will answer the design but the method,
Design (20%) research question, design, procedure, and
method, design, inappropriate to the 4
procedure, and study being
and procedure and analysis is vague.
analysis is presented. presented.
analysis of data. 5

States clearly the 2


State the purpose
Objectives and purpose and
States the purpose and and relevance of the No purpose and 3
relevance of the
Significance of relevance of the study study but do not relevance of the
study which
the study perfectly preludes
which preludes the prelude the study is provided for 4
(10%) statement of problem. statement of the in the introduction.
the statement of the
problem. 5
problem.

2
All sources are More than one Works Cited page is
References entered One part of format is element is missing or not done 3
(10%) appropriately using missing. consistently according to any of
APA system. incorrect. the correct format. 4

6
Name of the panelist: __________________________________________________________ Signature: ____________________ Date Signed: ______________________

You might also like