Scribd
Upload
132 views

Mo Del R R Squar e Adjusted R Square Std. Error of The Estimate Change Statistics R Square Change F Chang e df1 df2 Sig. F Change 1

This data summary provides insufficient information to interpret the results of a model predicting satisfaction. The adjusted R square value of 0.032 indicates the model explains little of the variance in satisfaction. The ANOVA F value of 1.407 and p-value of 0.247 show the model does not reliably predict satisfaction. Additionally, the p-values for the individual predictor variables are greater than 0.05, demonstrating they do not have a statistically significant impact on satisfaction. More data is needed to properly analyze the relationship between the predictor variables and satisfaction.

Uploaded by

kunal singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
132 views

Mo Del R R Squar e Adjusted R Square Std. Error of The Estimate Change Statistics R Square Change F Chang e df1 df2 Sig. F Change 1

This data summary provides insufficient information to interpret the results of a model predicting satisfaction. The adjusted R square value of 0.032 indicates the model explains little of the variance in satisfaction. The ANOVA F value of 1.407 and p-value of 0.247 show the model does not reliably predict satisfaction. Additionally, the p-values for the individual predictor variables are greater than 0.05, demonstrating they do not have a statistically significant impact on satisfaction. More data is needed to properly analyze the relationship between the predictor variables and satisfaction.

Uploaded by

kunal singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Assignment 4

Model Summary
Mo R R Adjusted Std. Error Change Statistics
del Squar R Square of the R Square F df1 df2 Sig. F
e Estimate Change Chang Change
e
1 .333a .111 .032 16.715 .111 1.407 4 45 .247
a. Predictors: (Constant), Reason 4, Reason 3, Reason 2, Reason 1

ANOVAb

Sum of
Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 1571.904 4 392.976 1.407 .247a
Residual 12572.116 45 279.380
Total 14144.020 49
a. Predictors: (Constant), Reason 4, Reason 3, Reason 2, Reason 1
b. Dependent Variable: Satisfaction
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Standardize t Sig. 95.0% Confidence Interval
Coefficients d for B
Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta Lower Upper


Bound Bound
1 (Constan 57.129 71.267 .802 .427 -86.410 200.668
t)
Reason -.540 .284 -.277 -1.900 .064 -1.112 .032
1
Reason .151 .333 .066 .454 .652 -.519 .821
2
Reason .086 .676 .018 .127 .900 -1.277 1.448
3
Reason .363 .442 .122 .821 .416 -.528 1.254
4
a. Dependent Variable: Satisfaction
We can determine from the following result we cannot interpret anything, so for this set of data we need more information.
This data is insufficient.
1. The Adjusted R Square in the Model Summary, which reveals to us the extent of change of the fulfilment got from the item is
clarified by the fluctuation of the reasons gave is little. It clarifies just 3.2% of the fluctuation in fulfilment.
2. The importance esteem in ANOVA is 0.247 which is > 0.05. This implies that the reasons gave in the investigation doesn't
dependably foresee the fulfilment of the use of the item.
3. The importance worth of the multitude of reasons given are genuinely irrelevant, for example they are > 0.05. This implies that
they have measurably zero impact on the fulfilment got from the item.
4. The researcher should quit making examination dependent on the current information and should gather more suitable
information for the exploration.

You might also like