The document discusses the psycho-physiological aspects of polygraph examinations, noting that physiological changes like increased respiration and pulse rates are involuntary responses triggered when a person is threatened by a stimulus they perceive as dangerous. It also outlines the psychology of lying and different theories for explaining deception. Finally, it addresses the admissibility and accuracy of polygraph results in court, finding that results are admissible with a stipulation and can be 95-100% accurate when administered properly by a trained examiner.
The document discusses the psycho-physiological aspects of polygraph examinations, noting that physiological changes like increased respiration and pulse rates are involuntary responses triggered when a person is threatened by a stimulus they perceive as dangerous. It also outlines the psychology of lying and different theories for explaining deception. Finally, it addresses the admissibility and accuracy of polygraph results in court, finding that results are admissible with a stipulation and can be 95-100% accurate when administered properly by a trained examiner.
2.To determine the possible psychological responses of lying; and 3.To know the accuracy and admissibility of polygraph result to court trial. The Psycho-Physiological Aspects of Polygraphy ü Involuntary physiological changes ü Inner deviations are involuntary and beyond conscious control üThey are triggered by the stimulating effect of well-prepared questions, to which a truthful response may result in punishment üAll physiological activities are recorded when a person is examined with a lie detector üOur complex system of internal check and balance, which primarily involves the body's automatic nervous system, is responsible for his ability to adjust When a stimulus is requested, the ear receives it and sends it to the brain's thought control center. During the interview and the actual test, the body's flight or fight mechanism analyzes the verbal stimulus and determines whether it will have an effect on the body's well-being., the thought-control center simply ignores it, the fight or flight mechanism is not stimulated, and the body continues to function at a normal physiological pace. A physiological chain reaction occurs when a stimulus is perceived by the subject to be threatening to his person; from relatively normal deviation. The subject's body adjusts to changes in the environment automatically, and his fight or flight mechanism kicks in to protect him from the consequences of being caught lying.
In this situation, nerve impulses originating in the medulla
of the brain are diverted to the central nervous system and automatic nervous system, where they are analyzed again and responsibility for their handling redelegated to the body's general emergency nervous system, known as the "sympathetic system." Certain physiological changes occur to varying degrees as the sympathetic system kicks in. The lie detector instrument records the various responses that occur in the human physiology, and these are the changes that the trained lie detector examiner can use to detect possible detection. To be clear, the polygraph instrument does not detect deception; rather, it measures certain identifiable physical reactions such as those affecting respiration rate, pulse rate, and galvanic skin resistance to a very small amount of current, in combination with the use of a reliable questioning technique. The Psychology and Psychological Responses of Lying Lying is a type of deception that involves deceiving others verbally.
The following are some of the concepts perceived and explained
by various theorists in psychology;
1.The psychoanalytic explanation of Sigmund Freud as the
interplay of id, ego, and super-ego can be used to explain lying. The ego is the mental level that operates according to the reality principle. Our id sometimes forces us to stay away from reality because it causes us anxiety. The following are some of the concepts perceived and explained by various theorists in psychology; 2.Maslow's hierarchy of needs states that we have an innate desire to meet our needs one by one. In order to reach these levels and avoid stumbling blocks on our way to meeting our needs, we make statements that may or may not be true.
When a person tells the truth versus when a person tells a
lie, neuropsychologists have noticed a distinct difference in brain activity. Because different parts of the brain are used to deliberately tell a lie than they are to speak the truth, there is a clear distinction between the two from a neuropsychological standpoint. There are mental disorders that may result in patients telling lies, but not realizing that what they are saying is not true. Examples include Paranoid Personality Disorder or some of the Dissociative Disorders.
Despite the fact that most people aren't very good at
detecting lies, scientific research has uncovered a few noteworthy methods for detecting deception. The use of physiological measures such as the polygraph to detect evidence of deception has a long history. Admissibility of Polygraph Examination/Result Is Polygraph Result/Examination admissible as evidence in court?
The answer is “YES”, if allowed by the judge. If the
polygraph was administered by an unqualified and inexperienced examiner, the results are unlikely to be used by the judges. Today, there is a lot of activity in the court system regarding the use of polygraphs, and the laws are rapidly changing. Under the following conditions, polygraph and expert testimony relating to it may be admissible with a stipulation to support other evidence of a defendant's involvement in a crime or to support or charge his testimony: A.That the admissibility of the polygraph test is a matter for the trial judge to decide. The trial judge may reject such evidence if he is not convinced that the examiner is a component or that the result was not obtained under proper conditions; B.That both parties' counsel and the subject sign a written condition for the subject's admission to the examination and subsequent admission to trials of the graph and examiner's opinion on behalf of either the defendant or the state; C.If the examiner's opinion is offered as evidence, the opposing party is entitled to cross-examine the examiner on the following topics: 1. The qualifications and training of the examiner;
2. The stipulation under which the test was administered;
3. The restrictions and possibilities for the errors of the technique;
4. At the good judgment of the trial judge, any other matter
deemed important to the inquiry. Accuracy of Polygraph Examination/Result
Studies on the accuracy of polygraph testing have been
conducted over the last 75 years. It is difficult to draw a precise figure for the accuracy of polygraph testing in all settings from the data because many different conditions factors are involved in the study, and because the polygraph examination is a very complex process. Nonetheless, the overwhelming body of evidence suggests that when a properly trained examiner employs a well-established testing procedure, the accuracy of polygraph examiners' decisions is generally in the range of 95 percent to 100 percent, depending on the factors that influence the test. QUESTIONS
Framework and Standards for Country Health Information Systems 2nd Edition Health Metrics Network - World Health Organization - The ebook is available for online reading or easy download
Framework and Standards for Country Health Information Systems 2nd Edition Health Metrics Network - World Health Organization - The ebook is available for online reading or easy download