Different Agency Theory Relationships
Different Agency Theory Relationships
When it comes to business and the concept of agency theory, there several
types of relationships that are closely intertwined and are faced with some sort
of disagreement.
Shown below are some of the most in-depth and connected relationships in
businesses that involve a principal-agent relationship and qualify for the
agency theory.
If the company executive acts negatively and reduces the worth of the
shareholder’s stock, it will spark a disadvantageous relationship.
On the other hand, if the company executive were to act ethically resulting in
some sort of financial boost in the shareholder’s stock, a positive connection
will form.
In such a case, the investor is the principal because they are giving a portion
of their income to the fund manager to allocate on their behalf.
If the fund manager were to invest in volatile stocks and yield a return less
than expected from the investor, a negative relationship begins to form.
Conversely, if the fund manager goes above and beyond and nets a profit
outside of the realm of expectation, the investor praises the fund manager and
there is a healthy linkage.
If the CEO were to make a wrong financial decision that put the organization
at a deficit, the board of directors is more likely to vote against the CEO in the
next election.
Oppositely, if the CEO were to introduce a new business sector that provided
unprecedented innovation in the market, they would be praised by the board
of directors and would likely stay in power for years to come.
All of the interactions and disagreements faced by both the principal and
agent are what make up the entire exploration of the concept.