0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views

Cubuilt Cepl VC 02 Msa

This document presents the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility study. It shows measurements from 3 appraisers measuring 10 parts using a vernier caliper to measure the hole diameter, which has a specification of -0.2 to 0.2. The data is analyzed to determine the repeatability, or equipment variation (EV), reproducibility, or appraiser variation (AV), and overall repeatability and reproducibility (GRR). The GRR is calculated to be 0.0129, which is less than 6% of the tolerance, indicating the gage system may be acceptable.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views

Cubuilt Cepl VC 02 Msa

This document presents the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility study. It shows measurements from 3 appraisers measuring 10 parts using a vernier caliper to measure the hole diameter, which has a specification of -0.2 to 0.2. The data is analyzed to determine the repeatability, or equipment variation (EV), reproducibility, or appraiser variation (AV), and overall repeatability and reproducibility (GRR). The GRR is calculated to be 0.0129, which is less than 6% of the tolerance, indicating the gage system may be acceptable.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

GAGE REPEATABILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY DATA SHEET GAGE REPEATABILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY DATA SHEET

VARIABLE DATA RESULTS VARIABLE DATA RESULTS


Part Number Gage Name Appraiser A Part Number Gage Name Appraiser A
M294.1199-01 Vernier Caliper S.M. Shukla M294.1199-01 Vernier Caliper S.M. Shukla
Part Name Gage Number Appraiser B Part Name Gage Number Appraiser B
Flange CEPL-VC-02 Virbahadur Flange CEPL-VC-02 Virbahadur
Characteristic Specification Gage Type Appraiser C Characteristic Gage Type Appraiser C
Hole Diameter -0.2 0.2 Digital Ranjit Hole Diameter Digital Ranjit
Characteristic Classification Trials Parts Appraisers Date Performed Characteristic Classification Trials Parts Appraisers Date Performed
CLASSIFICATION 3 10 3 08.10.2021 CLASSIFICATION 3 10 3 08.10.2021

APPRAISER/ PART AVERAGE Measurement Unit Analysis % Tolerance (Tol)


TRIAL # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Repeatability - Equipment Variation (EV) Repeatability to Tolerance Index
1. A 1 39.13 39.01 39.01 38.86 39.01 39 39.02 39.11 38.99 38.95 39.009 EV = Trials K1 % EV = 100 [EV*6.0/Tol]
R  K1
2 2 39.12 39.03 39.01 38.88 39.02 39 39.01 39.12 38.96 38.99 39.014 = 0.0217 x 0.5908 2 0.8862 = 100(0.013*6.0/0.400)
3 3 39.12 39.02 39.02 38.89 39.03 39.02 39.03 39.11 38.96 38.99 39.019 = 0.012800667 3 0.5908 = 19.20
4 AVE 39.123 39.02 39.013 38.877 39.02 39.007 39.02 39.113 38.97 38.977 X a  39.014 Reproducibility - Appraiser Variation (AV) Reproducibility to Tolerance Index
5 Range 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.04 Ra  0.021 AV = X DIFF  K2   EV
2
2
nr  % AV = 100 [AV*6.0/Tol]
6. B 1 39.09 39.02 39.02 38.88 39.01 39 38.99 39.12 38.98 38.94 39.005 = SQRT[(0.006 x 0.5231)^2 - (0.013 ^2/(10 x 3)] = 100(0.002*6.0/0.400)
7 2 39.11 39.03 39.01 38.86 39.02 39 39 39.11 38.97 38.96 39.007 = 0.001823397 Appraisers 2 3 = 2.74
8 3 39.11 39 39 38.89 39.03 39 39.01 39.13 38.99 38.97 39.013 n = number of parts K2 0.7071 0.5231 Precision to Tolerance Index (P/T Ratio)
9 AVE 39.103 39.017 39.01 38.877 39.02 39 39 39.12 38.98 38.957 X b  39.00833 r = number of trials % P/T = 100 [GRR*6.0/Tol]
10 Range 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 Rb  0.021 Repeatability & Reproducibility (GRR) = 100(0.013*6.0/0.400)
11. C 1 39.14 39.01 39.01 38.87 39.01 39 38.98 39.11 38.99 38.94 39.006 GRR = EV 2  AV 2 Parts K3 = 19.39
12 2 39.12 39.03 39.02 38.88 39.02 39 39 39.11 38.96 38.98 39.012 = SQRT[0.0128^2 + 0.0018^2] 2 0.7071 Gage system may be acceptable
13 3 39.11 39 39.01 38.88 39.03 39.01 39.02 39.12 38.96 38.97 39.011 = 0.012929882 3 0.5231 Part Variation to Tolerance Index
14 AVE 39.123 39.013 39.013 38.877 39.02 39.003 39 39.113 38.97 38.963 X c  39.00967 Part Variation (PV) 4 0.4467 % PV = 100 [PV*6.0/Tol]
15 Range 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.04 Rc  0.023 PV = Rp  K3 5 0.403 = 100(0.076*6.0/0.400)
16. PART X  39.01067 = 0.2400 x 0.3146 6 0.3742 = 113.26
Rp 
AVE ( Xp ) 39.117 39.017 39.012 38.877 39.02 39.003 39.007 39.116 38.973 38.966 0.24 = 0.075504 7 0.3534
17 R a  Rb  Rc  # OF APPRAISERS  R 0.021667 Total Variation (TV) 8 0.3375 % Total Variation (TV)
18 (Max x - Min x) = X DIFF  0.005667 TV = GRR  PV2 2
9 0.3249 Measurement Capability Index (%GRR)
19 R  D4 UCLR= 0.0559 = SQRT[0.0129^2+0.0755^2] 10 0.3146 %GRR = 100 [GRR/TV]
20 R  D3 LCLR= 0 = 0.076603106 = 100(0.013/0.077)
Tolerance = 16.88
* D4 =3.27 for 2 trials and 2.58 for 3 trials; D3 = 0 for up to 7 trials. UCLR represents the limit of individual R's. Circle those that are Tol = (Upper - Lower) Gage system may be acceptable
beyond this limit. Identify the cause and correct. Repeat these readings using the same appraiser and unit as originally used or dis- = (0.2000 - -0.2000) Number of Distinct Categories
card values and re-average and recompute R and the limiting value from the remaining observations. = 0.4 ndc = 1.41(PV/GRR)
All % Tolerance calculations are based upon predicting 6.0 sigma (99.73% of the area under the normal distribution curve). = 8
Notes: For information on the theory and constants used in the form see MSA Reference Manual, Fourth edition (AIAG) Gage system may be acceptable

Range Chart S.M. Shukla


Virbahadur
0.06 Ranjit

0.05
0.04
Range

0.03
0.02
0.01
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PART

Dial Gauge MSA (Gage R&R) 1 of 1

You might also like