Week 1 - Lecture PDF
Week 1 - Lecture PDF
Strategic purpose means : “the reasons for which organisations exist… The perceptions the
managers have of their organisation’s purpose will guide the strategy process and influence the
strategy content” (Bartlett and Ghoshall, 1994; Campbell and Tawadey, 1990)
https://sway.office.com/HKxHtikPMzNdv34n#content=aC3sMTRSG103XW
The ultimate objective of the strategic management process is to enable a firm to choose and
implement a strategy that generates a competitive advantage.
A firm has a competitive advantage when it is able to create more economic value than rival firms.
Economic value is simply the difference between the perceived benefits gained by a customer that
purchases a firm’s products or services and the full economic cost of these products or services.
2 - Barney & Hesterly (2014, 31) Types of competitive advantage - click to expand
Now that you are familiar with the key definitions of strategy and competitive advantage, please
watch the two videos below for how competitive advantage works in practice at Amazon and
Eastman.
STRATEGIC PURPOSE
Corporate mission
Most corporate mission statements are built around four main elements (Hill and Jones, 2001; De
Wit and Meyer, 2014)
1. Organisational Purpose – purpose (‘what we are here for’) is at the heart of mission:
perception of purpose shapes both strategy process and content (Ghoshal, 1994)
2. Organisational Beliefs – ‘where we are and what needs to be done’ - assumptions re:
environments and trajectories for success; the ‘possible and feasible’; Beliefs, or
‘organisational ideology’ or dominant logic should be widely shared (Prahalad and Bettis,
1986)
3. Organisational Values – ‘what is worthwhile, ethical and moral’ – what should be done and
how, and what activities should be avoided; Shared, values become part of the
‘organisational culture’ and impact on strategic direction – deeper than beliefs
4. Business Definition – ‘the business that we are in’ - a delineating definition; Boundaries of
activity: a guiding principle that helps draw the distinction between opportunities and
diversions
Corporate vision
‘...A vision articulates a view of a realistic, credible, attractive future for the organisation, a condition
that is better in some important ways than what now exists'. (Bennis and Nanus, 1986)
Why vision?
• Reasons for developing vision:In competing for business and resources, most organisations
will benefit from a vision that articulates where they wish to be
To see how vision works in practice, watch the video below that not only details Apple's vision,
but does it in a way typical to the company itself
5 - Apple - Perspective
• Mission: outlines the broad general directions that an organisation should and will follow,
summarising the reasoning
• Objectives: take the generalities of the mission and turn them into more specific
commitments
https://sway.office.com/HKxHtikPMzNdv34n#content=7Om8kav8l44iDH
“The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”. (Milton Friedman, New York Times, 13
September 1970)
“A business that makes nothing but money is a poor kind of business”. (Henry Ford, 1903)
Stakeholders can be divided into internal stakeholders (e.g. managers and employees) and
external stakeholders.
SHAREHOLDER VALUE
Perspective - driven by classical and neo-classical economics (Smith, Ricardo, Friedman) –
‘embracing greed’
Premise – corporations should operate to create value solely for those who invest risk capital (i.e.,
owners)
Implication – executives and managers must pursue shareholders' interests solely (above all –
eschewing their own) – appropriate control and monitoring methods are required
Focus - the corporation must recognise the interests of stakeholders (in order to manage,
circumvent or negate these) but has no obligation to serve them
Motivation - profit motivation is the sole basis for calculation and strategic planning/actions
Responsibilities – shareholder only - stakeholders, the environment, communities etc. are the
domain of government and individuals
STAKEHOLDER VALUE
Perspective - driven by conflict and Marxist analyses
Premise – workers, communities, labour organisations, governments, consumers, suppliers etc. all
play a role in generating corporate profits – all should share in the outcomes
Implications
• shareholders only input one ingredient to the mix and have no strong moral claim on
entirety of profits,
Responsibilities - management has an obligation to serve the interests of all constituents and
contributors to the corporate venture. This travels beyond direct (primary) participants to include
parties affected by corporate activity (secondary stakeholders - compensation for interference)
(Langtry, 1994)
Please listen to the discussion from the Aspen Institute about CSR and financial metrics. You should
also have a close look at this comparison of the two models (click to expand)
STAKEHOLDER MAPPING
Stakeholder mapping identifies stakeholders' expectations and power, and helps to establish
priorities.
1. What interest has each stakeholder in influencing the issue? What power has each
stakeholder to influence the issue
2. Determining purpose and strategy – whose expectations need to be prioritised?
3. Who are the key blockers and facilitators of strategy? Is it desirable to try to reposition
certain stakeholders?
Internal Stakeholders:
• Hierarchy
• Involvement in implementation
External Stakeholders:
https://sway.office.com/HKxHtikPMzNdv34n#content=FyBoJD5IEF5MgV
Have a close look at the two lists below of external and internal aspects of CSR. How many of
these aspects do you think organisations should be responsible for? All? None? Some?
Watch the video below to find out more about LuminAid, a company that designs an inflatable
solar lantern that could pack flat to be cost-effectively distributed after disasters. The whole
company is built around this one central mission -- basically, around their CSR.
15 - LuminAID
https://sway.office.com/HKxHtikPMzNdv34n#content=OYOGcvCjisKtu0
Watch the following Ted Talk detailing the business benefits of doing good, and then listen to
Michael Porter explaining his research into shared value as strategy.
If you want to know more about CSR and its role and importance in a global world, click the link
below to open the talk on an external site. The talk is given by Prof. Andrew McAuley, Pro Vice
Chancellor (Academic) at Southern Cross University, Australia
Also listen to your textbook authors introduce the concept of strategy below.
TASK 1: PREPARE
TASK 2: DISCUSS
TASK 3: REFLECT
TASK 1: PREPARE
On Moodle there are compulsory readings for this week's tutorials, and essential materials for your
assessment preparation. We expect you to have read all the materials before your tutorials. You
can access them from the MMU library OR in PDF format on Moodle.
Prepare the recommended reading and tutorial slides for the on-campus tutorials. Your tutor will
facilitate discussions to develop the concepts introduced in the lecture and develop the topic, as well
as focus on case studies. In assessment clinics we will help consolidate the week's topic for the
assessment. Please check your timetable for sessions.
TASK 2: DISCUSS
Synthesizing the key takeways of this week's topic, answer the following question (200 words) on
Moodle in the Microsoft Form provided. Your answers are can only be seen by the tutors. We
recommend saving your answers via email as well, as they can be used in preparation for your exam.
TASK 3: REFLECT
Reflect on your learning this week by completing the short survey on Moodle. This will enable tutors
to make adjustments to further sessions based on your feedback. If most of you feel like we need to
return to a particular topic, we will accommodate this in our assessment clinics. Your answers are
anonymous.
Your tutor will monitor your engagement with the tasks and their completion, and will offer
feedback on your contributions.
RECOMMENDED READING
This lecture is also available with captions for the audio recordings.
Whittington, R., Regnér, P., Johnson, G., Angwin, D. and Scholes, K., 2020. Exploring Strategy: Text
and Cases. Pearson.
Hill, C.W., Jones, G.R. and Schilling, M.A., 2014. Strategic management: Theory & cases: An
integrated approach. Cengage Learning.
Barney, J.B. and Hesterly, W.S., 2015. Strategic management and competitive advantage. Global
Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Caroll, A.B. (1993) Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, South-Western
Publishing
Clarke, T. (1998) The Stakeholder corporation: A Business Philosophy for the Information Age, Long
Range Planning
Copeland, T., Koller, T. and Murrin, J. (1995), Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of
Companies, Wiley
De Witt and Meyer (2010), Strategy, process, content, context. Fourth Edition
Donaldson, L. (1990), The Ethereal Hand: Organisational Economics and Management Theory,
Academy of Management Review
Johnson, G. (1987) Strategic Change and Management Process, Long Range Planning
Johnson, G. (1992) Managing Strategic Change: Strategy, culture and Action, Long Range Planning
Jonhson, G, Scholes, K. and Whittington, K. (2012) Fundamentals of Strategy, Rearson Education LTD
Langtry, B. (1994), Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business, Business Ethics Quarterly