2018 - 12 - 11 - SandO - Agenda - Attachment - 1 - To - Item - 16 - Road - Infrastructure - Asset - Management - Plan 2018
2018 - 12 - 11 - SandO - Agenda - Attachment - 1 - To - Item - 16 - Road - Infrastructure - Asset - Management - Plan 2018
Committee
11 December 2018
Attachment 1 to Item 16
Road Infrastructure
December 2018
Revision 1.0
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 3
2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Asset Management Plan Definition and Purpose...................................................... 4
2.2 Scope ....................................................................................................................... 4
2.3 Road infrastructure................................................................................................... 4
2.4 Road infrastructure Asset Management Objectives .................................................. 5
2.5 Levels of Service ...................................................................................................... 5
2.6 Legislative & Standards Requirements..................................................................... 6
2.7 Current Levels of Service ......................................................................................... 6
2.8 Measured Levels of Service ..................................................................................... 7
3. Future Demand .................................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Demand Drivers ....................................................................................................... 7
3.2 Demand Impacts on Assets...................................................................................... 8
3.3 Climate Change Adaptation...................................................................................... 8
4. Lifecycle Management Plan ................................................................................................ 9
4.1 Assets ...................................................................................................................... 9
4.2 Asset Valuation ........................................................................................................ 9
4.3 Asset Condition ...................................................................................................... 10
4.4 Road infrastructure Operations & Maintenance Plan .............................................. 14
4.5 Asset Renewals ..................................................................................................... 15
4.6 Capital Upgrades and New Assets ......................................................................... 16
4.7 Capitalisation of Assets .......................................................................................... 17
4.8 Disposal and Replacement of Assets ..................................................................... 18
5. Risk Management .............................................................................................................. 19
5.1 Critical Assets ........................................................................................................ 19
5.2 Risk Assessment.................................................................................................... 19
6. Financial Summary ............................................................................................................ 20
6.1 Financial Statements and Projections .................................................................... 20
6.2 Funding Strategies ................................................................................................. 20
6.3 Budget Forecasts ................................................................................................... 20
7. Plan Improvement and Monitoring ................................................................................... 22
7.1 Status of Asset Management Practices .................................................................. 22
7.2 Improvement Program............................................................................................ 22
7.3 Monitoring and Review Processes for the Asset Management Plan ....................... 23
7.4 Asset Management Effectiveness .......................................................................... 23
1.1 SEALED ROADS - SERVICE LEVEL CATALOGUE .............................................. 24
8. ANNEX A: Levels of Service ............................................................................................ 24
1.2 GRAVEL ROADS - SERVICE LEVEL CATALOGUE.............................................. 27
Council’s road infrastructure plays a vital role in connectivity of the 867km road network (both 670km
sealed and 197km unsealed roads) across the Noosa Shire. There are in excess of 38,000 financial
road infrastructure assets on Council’s register considered in this Asset Management Plan (AMP).
The road infrastructure assets have a current replacement value of $420m, equating to
approximately 43% of Council’s financial assets.
Operational and maintenance activities are fundamental for the ongoing management of the road
infrastructure; it is considered an investment not a liability. The road infrastructure assets rely on
operational and maintenance costs for the serviceability of the assets identified in this plan. These
activities are a significant annual investment that directly influence the potential for road
infrastructure assets to reach its intended service life. The ongoing development of asset knowledge
through asset inspections, improved maintenance activities, subsequent defect monitoring and
repairs are fundamental in developing sustainable intervention levels for renewals and replacement
of road infrastructure assets.
The operational and maintenance expenses for road infrastructure make up approximately 14% of
the $90m annual budget. The capital works program fluctuates from year to year, however, the
proposed 2018/19 capital works program the capital investment of $6.9m for road infrastructure
equates to 23% of the $29.5m capital works program.
The mitigation of risks is fundamental in the management of road infrastructure assets for Council to
make informed decisions. With the focus placed on consistent cyclical inspections across all road
infrastructure assets and condition data accurately recorded in the Technology One - asset
management system (T1). This will be achieved by reconciling financial asset data, GIS data and
inspection data to have a single point of truth for all road infrastructure assets.
This road infrastructure asset management plan (AMP) meets the objectives of the Noosa Corporate
Plan. Key focus areas under the Corporate Plan’s Theme 4: Long term planning for Noosa Shire –
includes: undertaking long term financial sustainability planning identifying asset management
outcomes and establishing functional Asset Management Plans for all Council asset classes. These
focus areas have been a major driver in the development of this AMP. The road infrastructure AMP
provides the relevant information and organisational activities to ensure the organisational objectives
for asset management have been achieved and that the pathway for continual improvement across
all management activities for road infrastructure has been established. The provision of road
infrastructure is, therefore, a significant pillar of the infrastructure services provided by Council.
The purpose of the road infrastructure asset management plan is to define the whole of life activities
associated with operating and maintaining of road infrastructure for the Noosa Community. The plan
identifies the assets and the levels of service to meet the expectations of the Noosa Community. A
key outcome of the asset management plan is the identification of the current state of the asset
conditions and the development of renewal and maintenance plans. Importantly, the identification of
future costs and potential risks to the assets that support the service for operating road infrastructure
is fundamental in achieving the asset management objectives for Noosa Council.
2.2 Scope
The scope of this asset management plan is to ensure the road infrastructure meets, demonstrates
and incorporates the following key asset management objectives:
Any changes in the levels of service to the road infrastructure will be required to demonstrate the
benefit and be approved by Council. Changes in levels of service should be addressed through the
asset management governance framework prior to the approval by Council.
Regular inspections are critical to the management of road infrastructure and the inspections
undertaken by Council, and by third party providers will meet the standards and statutory
requirements to ensure all assets remain safe to all users of Council’s roads. The scheduled
maintenance activities will be within the defined timeframes to ensure that all potential or identified
defects are rectified.
Levels of service must be readily measurable and preferably from available data sources. Each level
of service should be stated in terms of appropriateness and understood by the community for whom
the service is provided. The levels of service in this AMP are intended to:
The levels of service outlined in this road infrastructure AMP are also aligned to:
• Statutory, legislative and relevant code requirements.
• Information obtained from asset condition assessments and maintenance analysis; and
• Noosa Council’s Corporate Plan.
The levels of service have been catalogued and are located at Annex A.
There are six separate service catalogues developed that relate to road infrastructure assets and
these include:
• Sealed roads
• Gravel roads
• Landscape & Mowing
• Carparks
• Traffic Management
• Public Transport Infrastructure
3. Future Demand
3.1 Demand Drivers
There is currently an inconsistent approach of demand management applied to the management of
the road infrastructure through the monitoring of the asset conditions, behavioural change (alternate
modes of transport) and traffic volumes. Traffic congestion and safety are key demand drivers on
the current and future levels of serviceability for road infrastructure. Significant changes in the
monitoring of these activities should act as an indicator to reviewing demand management for a
specific road infrastructure. It is Council Policy that any change in the level of service due to demand
is reported to Council in accordance with current guidelines and practices.
The major drivers of capital upgrade for road infrastructure will be:
• external funding opportunities to improve trunk networks,
• risk management – including road safety,
• changes in traffic volumes and vehicle types,
• climate change adaptation,
• transport modal/behaviour change,
• transport strategy initiatives,
• Flood mitigation,
• changes in technologies,
• Impacts on operational and maintenance activities.
The various and regular road infrastructure inspection programs will act as a trigger for any need to
improve on preventative maintenance activities to preserve the life of the assets.
In addition, the development of a gravel road upgrade program and a sealed road reconstruction
program will determine the priority of upgrade works required on these assets into the future.
In response to the demand in the peak holiday areas Council is currently trialling a management
approach through alternative transport modes and travel initiatives through the development of the
Noosa Council Transport Strategy. In response to the demand in the school zone areas Council has
commenced planning to undertake travel initiatives through the Transport Strategy.
Other demand impacts on the road network relate to periods of scheduled closures for asset
repairs/refurbishment or maintenance works. These scheduled activities should ideally be
undertaken outside of the peak traffic periods (Christmas to Easter) where vehicle movements on
our road network is most prevalent. Where practical, night works for scheduled maintenance and
capital works may be necessary to reduce the impacts on parts of the road transport network.
4.1 Assets
Council’s road infrastructure plays a vital role in connectivity of the 680km road network (both sealed
and unsealed roads) across the Noosa Shire. There are many different asset types within the road
infrastructure asset management plan, with various units of measurement.
A consistent condition ranking scale has been chosen by Council as the framework for measuring
road infrastructure assets, based on the 1 to 5 ranking according to the International Infrastructure
Management Manual (IIMM). Any asset scoring 4 (fair) to 5 (poor) will be considered and prioritised
under an asset specific renewal program.
Sealed road condition assessments are undertaken by contracted services due to the volume of
asset data attributes that are collected across the network. The data is loaded into Council’s
Pavement Management System (PMS) and is analysed and modelled to create a reseal program for
the sealed road network. A full network condition assessment is planned every four (4) years to
ensure the continued development and updating of a five-year reseal program is based on up to
date condition information.
In addition to the above contracted condition assessments, Council staff undertake visual condition
assessments for requests that have been reported for sealed road surfaces in poor condition. These
assessments are undertaken on a “reactive” approach to determine if the request warrants a section
of road be prioritised and placed within the reseal program for future renewal.
The gravel re-sheeting program is the asset renewal of the gravel road surfaces. Gravel road
condition assessments are conducted on an annual basis. This annual assessment determines the
gravel road re-sheeting program.
There are a number of different asset classes within the road infrastructure that are yet to have a
physical condition assessment undertaken. For the purpose of this AMP, these assets have been
assigned an age-based condition which is determined on the remaining life of the asset. Further
development and prioritisation is required to ensure that all road infrastructure assets are reconciled
within the asset system and condition assessments are undertaken. When undertaking condition
assessments, the asset attributes will be updated prior to the next roads asset evaluation. The
condition assessments will enable the development of renewal programs for the specific asset
classes listed below:
In asset reporting an approach to linking individual assets to the specific asset class has been
undertaken. Figure 1 details sealed and gravel road conditions and at figures 2 & 3 include all other
road infrastructure asset classes that are considered in this AMP. These assets are grouped
consistently and reported accordingly throughout this document. Any road infrastructure assets that
have reached condition 5 will be included in the relevant renewal programs of the 10-year Capital
Works Program. The condition NULL refers to assets that do not have any condition data assigned
due to inconsistent asset data.
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1 2 3 4 5 NULL
KM (Sealed) KM (Gravel)
Figure 2 identifies all road infrastructure assets other than the sealed and gravel road assets. The
graph highlights the volume of units for the signs and kerb & channel asset classes and highlights
the majority of signs assets at condition 4. This condition is based on the anticipated remaining life
of the sign assets and does not reflect the physical condition of those assets. Undertaking physical
condition assessments of the assets represented in Figure 2 is required. Physical condition
knowledge will assist in developing a more realistic approach to developing renewal plans that are
prioritised and planned.
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Figure 3 has been produced to exclude signs and the kerb & channel assets to better identify the
condition of the remaining asset classes. The graph below highlights roadside barriers, carparks and
bus stops that have assets nearing the end of their useful lives and reflected as conditions 4 and 5.
This information is utilised in determining priority on when asset classes are undertaking physical
condition assessments across all the road infrastructure assets.
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Figure 3: Condition of other infrastructure (excluding Roads, Signs and Kerb & Channel) by Number of Assets
The breakdown of replacement costs by asset condition is depicted in the graphs below (figures 4 &
5). The importance of these graphs are to identify the value of each asset classes’ condition and
where future investments are required to renew or rehabilitate the road infrastructure assets. The
$ (Sealed) $ (Gravel)
The above graph in figure 4 indicates that the majority of Council’s sealed and gravel roads are in a
good to very good condition. The continued approach to having good sustainable asset renewal
interventions will ensure this level of condition is achieved across future generations.
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Figure 5 identifies the “non-road” assets and the relevant value of each condition. The significance
of the above graph is that signage assets that had the highest units in condition 4 (refer to Figure 2)
is not the highest in value at $3.4m. The highest valued assets in poor condition is the 43 carparks
with a value of $12.6m. The current condition is based on the remaining life of the asset. It is
recommended to reconcile carpark asset information and undertake physical condition inspections
to develop a suitable renewal program for carparks. The development of these renewal programs
for each asset class is essential in further improving the 10-year Capital Works Program.
Maintenance and operational costs are identified to ensure council understands the whole of life
costs associated with the day-to-day management of road infrastructure assets. The figure below
identifies the long term financial commitment required in maintaining assets. In order to maintain
assets to an acceptable level, the cumulative costs over a ten-year period will equate to $130m. It is
proposed to develop a more detailed list of operational and maintenance activities per annum by
asset class and utilise the T1 asset management system to identify maintenance by the breakdown
of asset classes within the road infrastructure asset classes. In addition, more detailed and longer
term planning for maintenance has been identified as an improvement from this AMP.
Sealed ( with Signs & Lines) Gravel Rd (with signs & lines) Road Furniture Landscaping / Mowing Car parks
Road infrastructure asset renewals are condition based. Condition assessments provide staff the
ability to develop capital renewal programs. The ongoing asset management maturity and
development of the condition assessments and subsequent maintenance and renewal plans relies
heavily on the continued componentisation of all road infrastructure assets within the road corridor.
Renewal expenditure is work which does not increase the road infrastructure design capacity but
restores, rehabilitates, replaces or renews an existing asset to its original service capacity. Improved
condition assessment data capture is currently being developed to include asset renewal
considerations based on physical conditions and estimates of remaining useful life of assets to guide
and improve renewal programs. Renewal plans are developed to maintain levels of service to ensure
assets achieve their optimal useful life before they reach the asset condition range of 5. Staff
continue to work through the various asset classes to develop renewal programs for the specific
asset classes.
In the absence of condition data, an age based approach to identify when Council’s road
infrastructure will reach their useful life has been developed to determine an overall renewal plan.
Priority is required across all the assets classes that have not had physical condition assessments
to develop a suite of renewal programs.
The graph below depicts the planned renewals by asset class over the next 10 years. There are
major renewals identified in the year 2026 for road furniture assets, which is a direct relationship of
when initial asset data was collected and the construction dates of the assets were estimated. It is
expected that through physical condition assessments that spike in renewals will be better defined
and spread over many years as the renewal program will be based on condition and not remaining
useful life.
As the road infrastructure assets age, continued condition assessments are required to monitor the
assets and produce more defined renewal plans. The graph below enables Council to identify and
plan for these significant renewal activities for the next 10 years.
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$-
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
Sealed ( with Signs & Lines) Gravel Rd (with signs & lines) Road Furniture Landscaping / Mowing Car parks
Figure 7 identifies the cumulative costs and future investment required in renewing road
infrastructure over a 10-year period. The sealed road reseal program is Council’s most significant
renewal program and is identified in Annex D and is reflected in the development of Council’s 10-
year Capital Works Program.
Included as part of the system improvements is the progression to decision making based on better
data. Modern tools of data collection and interpretation will allow a greater understanding of how
assets are used, how they are performing and where the demands for improvements are.
The combination of better data into models of cost benefit analysis, sustainability, environmental
impacts and overall community benefit will ensure efficient and effective planning for capital
upgrades and new road infrastructure assets.
As an example, the development of the Noosa Transport Strategy initiatives will aim to capture data
and undertake the above functions to support when upgrades for new on and off road infrastructure
assets should be considered.
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
Sealed ( with Signs & Lines) Gravel Rd (with signs & lines) Road Furniture
One of the most significant upgrades required to the road network is the Tewantin Bypass. This
project forms part of the demaining agreement between the Department of Main Roads and Noosa
Shire Council (April 2000) which states that Main Roads will plan, design and construct a bypass
connecting Cooroy-Noosa Road and Eumundi-Noosa Road. The project is dependent on funding
from the State Government and has no defined timeframes imposed on it. The Tewantin Bypass is
considered a high priority for Noosa Council, especially as traffic volumes have increased
dramatically over the intervening period and the Cooroy-Noosa Rd intersection is a known accident
blackspot. Planning and discussions continue between both levels of government in anticipation of
the project getting allocated State funding in the near future, however, due to the dependencies
noted above this project is not represented in the forecasted upgrades profile in figure 8.
Additionally, a gravel road upgrade program and a sealed road reconstruction program is being
developed to identify and prioritise roads that may be considered for upgrading. These upgrading
programs will prioritise gravel roads that could be considered for future sealing and the sealed road
reconstruction program will prioritise narrow sealed roads that require reconstruction and/or
widening. It is planned to have these programs developed by the end of the 2018/19 financial year.
The above graph highlights the various proposed upgrades currently identified in Council’s draft 10-
year capital works program. On the establishment of the sealed road reconstruction program and
the gravel road priority program, it is anticipated there will be more upgrades required on Council’s
road network.
The disposal and commissioning of assets from the asset register is undertaken in the capitalisation
and asset write-on/off process. This process is being delivered via the Asset Management Branch
and Finance Branch.
The key risks associated with achieving the above objectives of Council’s road infrastructure
management activities and associated levels of service have been identified throughout this AMP
and are outlined below:
These risks and all other current risks will be regularly reviewed and if necessary, they can be
documented in the annual Branch Plan – Civil Operations. Should there be a need for them to be
further escalated they can be addressed for consideration by the Asset Management Working Group,
Executive Team, and Audit and Risk Committee.
To mitigate these risks there are resulting actions from this AMP. For Council to make informed
decisions, it is understood that focus must be placed on consistent cyclical inspections across all
roads and road infrastructure assets with condition data accurately recorded in T1 asset
management system. This then supports the reconciling of financial asset data, GIS data and
inspection data to have a single point of truth for all road and road infrastructure assets.
The operational and maintenance expenses for road infrastructure make up approximately 14% of
the $90m annual budget. The capital works program fluctuates from year to year, however, the
proposed 2018/19 capital works program the capital investment of $6.9m for road infrastructure
equates to 23% of the $29.5m capital works program.
The annual operating plan details the financial statements and projections associated with the
operational and maintenance expenses for the road infrastructure on an annual basis. The capital
investments including renewals, upgrades and expansions are highlighted in the annual capital
works program which is reflected in the 10-year capital works program.
The funding strategy, key assumptions, reliability and confidence levels are detailed in the Council’s
long-term financial plan. More detailed funding strategies that promote the long-term sustainability
of the road infrastructure will be further developed and defined in future asset management plans.
Figure 9 identifies the current forecasts for the operational, maintenance and renewal expenses to
demonstrate the whole of life costs over a 10-year period for the road infrastructure in the amount of
$202.8m. In summarising, the 10-year forecast has an overall expenditure of $17.7m p.a. to $18.9m
p.a. from year 1 to year 10. There will be further asset renewal and maintenance activities to be
developed over coming years that will influence this current forecast. To achieve good asset
knowledge of all road infrastructure assets it is important to continue with undertaking asset data
reconciliation and physical condition assessments to make well informed asset decisions.
The road infrastructure assets have varying useful lives for the asset classes maintained by Council.
The road infrastructure useful lives vary, based on construction, material type and have estimated
lives between 20 – 100 years.
2029
2028
2027
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Development of ongoing maintenance activities will ensure that future asset failure will be minimised
with a “no-surprises” approach for future funding forecasts. This will be supported through the initial
development of condition monitoring to predict potential maintenance and renewal requirements. In
compiling the current forecasts the following general assumptions have been identified.
• Proposed Capital Renewal Program will be funded in accordance with the current Council
model adopted;
• Renewal works will be prioritised according to asset condition;
• The condition of the assets reflect what is reported within this document;
• Current maintenance funding levels will meet service level requirements;
• Renewals, maintenance and isolated failure replacement is generally ‘like for like’;
• Where a renewal must be provided to a higher standard, the difference in cost between a ‘like
for like’ renewal and the higher standard is to be treated as an asset upgrade.
• Depreciation is in accordance with Council Policy;
• There is no allowance for CPI as the continuing revaluation and condition inspection process
will make adjustments for current rates.
1. Asset Inventory – Ensure that there is one single asset register/hierarchy that captures all
parent and child assets; at a level of the lowest or appropriate repairable unit. All other
duplicated asset lists/registers should be eliminated. T1 is the Enterprise Asset Management
Repository. Prior to the revaluation, it is recommended a detailed asset register and data
reconciliation project establishes a single point of truth for asset data within T1.
3. Capital Planning – The development of upgrade programs will support maintaining the levels
of service and expectations of the community. There are two upgrade programs being
developed for completion by the end of the 2018/19 financial year and include:
a. 5-Year Reseal Program
b. The Gravel Road Upgrade Program
c. The Sealed Road Reconstruction Program
These programs will improve prioritisation and strategy around potential upgrades to the road
network.
4. Asset Systems – There is an initial implementation of operational work orders for planned,
reactive work and inspections to date. There are a number of functions of the T1 system that
would improve the operational and maintenance activities and further improve the asset
management objectives of the organisation. These include:
i. Planned maintenance work orders;
ii. Costings via work orders;
iii. Inspections and defects logged within T1;
iv. Asset performance reporting from T1;
v. Data capture – asset validation and updating.
5. Renewal Plans - The establishment of renewal plans for all assets considered in this AMP is
considered essential to achieving good asset management outcomes. Renewal plans are
based on understanding the condition of Council’s assets and modelling to ensure that the
intervention for renewal achieves the assets useful life. The establishment and review of these
renewal plans will be a focus for the Road Infrastructure Working Group to develop and
implement into Council’s processes and procedures.
6. Maintenance Plans – Plans must be regularly reviewed and incorporated into the annual
budget process. Continued inspections and recording of asset condition and maintenance
activities are key to achieving this initiative. This will be a key outcome for the Road
Infrastructure Working Group to develop and review the road infrastructure maintenance plan
for all the assets considered in this AMP.
The AMP will have a high-level annual review for developing the annual budget from the
maintenance and renewal plans. A full document review will occur on a three-year cycle, in line with
the completion of detailed condition assessments and the financial asset revaluation of the road
infrastructure assets.
Reactive work (customer All requests for maintenance. 20 business days (target)
requests)
Signs & lines maintenance
(Provision and maintenance of signs and line-marking within the sealed road network)
Cyclic Inspections Hinterland Work Zones Six monthly
Coastal Work Zones Three monthly
Reactive work (customer All requests for maintenance. 20 business days (target)
requests)
Road verge maintenance
(Verge slashing, vegetation height & width clearing to improve visibility etc.)
Cyclic Inspections No scheduled inspections – work is based on the maintenance
schedule.
Reactive work (customer All requests for maintenance. 20 business days (target)
requests)
Street Cleaning
(Scheduled and reactive mechanical and manual cleaning of sealed street pavements and kerbs in urban
areas to provide good amenity, reduce risk of stormwater drainage blockages, and help protect water quality
in our rivers by reducing the amount of debris and leaves that enter stormwater drainage)
Cyclic Inspections Mechanical street sweeping contract. No scheduled inspections.
Servicing information is
available through GPS in
contractor trucks.
Scheduled work The gravel road-grading program aligns with the cyclic inspection
program with work done as identified from inspections (defects &
proactive interventions) to maintain safe trafficable surface with
additional specific works as identified below. ix
Key Statistics xii Approx. 49 off-road car parks with estimated 2,492 parking spaces
Street Cleaning
(Scheduled and reactive mechanical and manual cleaning of sealed street pavements and kerbs in urban
areas to provide good amenity, reduce risk of stormwater drainage blockages, and help protect water quality
in our rivers by reducing the amount of debris and leaves that enter stormwater drainage)
Cyclic Inspections Cleaning contracts audit (sites selected Monthly
ad hoc)
Cost per rateable property to maintain car parking $37.77 per Queensland Department of
spaces rateable Local Government comparative
property data not available.
(FY2016/17 Actual Costs $1,132,892 / 30,000 rateable
properties)
PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Service Indicator Performance Measure Methodology
Road network – car Satisfaction Noosa community satisfaction Community satisfaction mean
parks mean rating score compared to performance rating from the
the State mean rating score (out LGAQ 2017 Community
of optimum rating of 5). Satisfaction Tracking Survey
for Provincial areas for:
NSC mean State mean
rating (2017) rating (2017) Theme: Basic Services &
Infrastructure
3.43 3.28 Function: Road Maintenance xviii
Scheduled work Turf maintenance (mowing Category 1 –28 cuts (high profile
contract) xxi areas no road sites included in
this category.)
Category 2 - 18 cuts per annum
Category 3 – 18 cuts per annum
(local roads/rural)
Category 4 – 10 cuts per annum
(site specific)
PERFORMANCE MEASURE
3.43 3.28
Legislative responsibility to Under the Land Act 1994 local government is trustee of road reserve and
provide the service has responsibility to manage use of reserves.
Note: maintenance of other traffic management infrastructure such as signs & traffic control devices is
undertaken as part of routine road maintenance activities.
Cyclic work Traffic light installations inspected Quarterly
(contract)
Scheduled work Work as identified from quarterly inspections
Operations
[Activities include road safety investigations, audits and minor improvements such as speed limit adjustments,
traffic noise complaints, visibility & sight line issues, requests for new signs and lines and other measures to
ensure that the road network is safe and traffic movements are effectively controlled and processing
applications for heavy vehicles to use local roads]
Programs
[Initiatives aimed managing congestion and reducing demand for increased capacity on the road network and
car parking]
Scheduled activities Free holiday bus service Twice annually including:
• Easter (From Good Friday for 10
days)
PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Service Indicator Performance Measure Methodology
Traffic Management Satisfaction Noosa community Community satisfaction mean
satisfaction mean rating performance rating from the LGAQ
score compared to the State 2017 Community Satisfaction
mean rating score (out of Tracking Survey for Provincial areas
optimum rating of 5). for:
Legislative responsibility to None – however, State funding deeds for public transport infrastructure tie
provide this service responsibilities to the Local Government Act as trustee of the road reserve.
xxv
The State is responsible for the provision of public transport through the issue of contracts to providers in the
south east Queensland integrated mass transit area which includes the Noosa Shire local government area –
refer Transport Operations Act 1994.
While local government funds the cost of provision of public transport infrastructure (bus shelters/bus stops),
the State has been providing funding to assist local government to reach disability access compliance. All
requests for new shelters and stops go via Translink in the first instance.
Maintenance
[Regular inspections and work to maintain public transport assets including shelters, bench seats etc.]
Note: Provision and maintenance of bus stop signage and timetables is responsibility of Translink.
Cyclic inspections Bus shelters/taxi ranks (hinterland) Annual
Bus shelters/taxi ranks (coastal) Every 4 months
Operations
[Activities including cleaning, graffiti and vandalism repairs etc.]
Reactive work xxviii Graffiti 2 business days
Vandalism 20 business days
Bus shelter lights 20 business days
Programs
[Initiatives are aimed at providing public transport options to localities where no public bus service is provided
by Translink]
Scheduled activities Flexilink taxi service – Boreen Monday to Saturday – 3 return trips
Point to Tewantin per day with prescribed departure
and arrival times. (subject to
bookings)
Council Cabs - one service per week for each locality as follows:
Suburb Drop Off/Pick Up Day
Location
Noosaville Noosa Civic, Tewantin Tuesday
or Wallace Drive
Noosaville
Noosa Heads, Sunshine Beach, Noosa Fair, Noosa Wednesday
Sunrise Beach, Castaways Beach, Heads
Marcus Beach, Peregian Beach,
Lake Weyba
Tewantin, Cooroibah Poinciana Avenue, Wednesday
Tewantin, Noosa Civic,
Wallace Drive
Noosaville
Cooroy, Federal, Black Mountain, Emerald Street, Thursday
Cooroy Mountain, Lake Macdonald Cooroy
Pomona, Cooran, Kin Kin Memorial Avenue, Thursday
Pomona
Reactive Enquiries/complaints (transport No defined level of service – matters
programs) generally dealt within 5 business
days.
Role Function
Internal
Council Staff Council officers play a major role in managing assets to ensure that they
provide a level of service that meets the needs of both residents and
visitors to the area. Council officers implement the components identified
in the road infrastructure asset management plan.
Elected Council Officers This stakeholder group includes Councilors and the Mayor for the Council.
They are primarily responsible to ensure that their decisions represent and
reflect the needs of the wider Noosa community.
Road infrastructure Provides technical advice to improve decision making across all internal
Working Group stakeholders. The group must ensure the asset management planning
covers the whole of life and optimally balances cost, risk and performance
of the road infrastructure where possible.
Asset Manager Infrastructure Services Director responsible for Infrastructure Services
branch management.
Civil Operations Responsible for the day-to-day operations and maintenance activities and
delivering the annual reseal and re-sheeting programs.
Asset Planning Manager Responsible for the condition assessments in developing renewal
programs.
Finance Ensures that the appropriate level of financial information is made
available to Infrastructure Services branch management.
External
Community & Residents Residents are the core users of road infrastructure. Their needs, wants
and expectations are conveyed to Council, which should be reflected in
the levels of service for maintaining a good road network.
Councils Insurer Ensures that all insurance and risk are adequately addressed.
Visitors Visitor’s wants, needs and expectations drive the development in areas of
the highest tourism usage.
It is important that the defined roles have the capability and capacity within their management
responsibility to make good on the responsibilities assigned to them. From stakeholder discussions
held during development of the Asset Management Improvement Roadmap, some of these
responsibilities may be centralised in the first instance and then transferred to other parts of the
Organisation when the appropriate capability and/or capacity is developed.
Document History
Distribution of Copies
Abbreviations
Abbreviations Meaning
AM Asset Management
AMP Asset Management Plan
CA Condition Assessment
ISO International Standards Organisation
KPI Key Performance Indicators
(LoS) Level of Service
SAMP Strategic Asset Management Plan
Proposed Amendments
The 5-Year Reseal and Rehab program consists of the following years to be planned:
1. Year 2019/20
2. Year 2020/21
3. Year 2021/22
4. Year 2022/23
5. Year 2023/24