0% found this document useful (0 votes)
253 views2 pages

5 4 3 2 1 Score: Rubrics in Grading Research Proposal S.Y. 2021-2022

1) The rubric assesses research proposals on several criteria in 5 categories: introduction, literature review, methodology, references, and proper use of tenses. 2) Sections are scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being complete and 1 lacking most components. The total score determines the proposal's overall quality. 3) Introduction criteria include stating the topic, previews, purpose, hypothesis, and significance. Methodology criteria cover design, procedures, and statistical analysis. Strong proposals will meet all criteria in each section.

Uploaded by

Isaac Gallela
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
253 views2 pages

5 4 3 2 1 Score: Rubrics in Grading Research Proposal S.Y. 2021-2022

1) The rubric assesses research proposals on several criteria in 5 categories: introduction, literature review, methodology, references, and proper use of tenses. 2) Sections are scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being complete and 1 lacking most components. The total score determines the proposal's overall quality. 3) Introduction criteria include stating the topic, previews, purpose, hypothesis, and significance. Methodology criteria cover design, procedures, and statistical analysis. Strong proposals will meet all criteria in each section.

Uploaded by

Isaac Gallela
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

RUBRICS IN GRADING RESEARCH PROPOSAL

S.Y. 2021-2022

TITLE OF RESEARCH STUDY: ________________________________________________________________________________


SECTION: __________________________________

5 4 3 2 1 SCORE
Lacks more than 4
Parts of Research Paper With complete parts Lacks 1 component Lacks 2 components Lacks 3 components
components
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
States the main topic and States the main topic but There is no clear main topic
A. BACKGROUND OF Engaging, states the main topic and
previews the structure of the does not adequately preview and the structure of the paper Absent, no evidence
THE STUDY previews the structure of the paper
paper the structure of the paper is missing
B. STATEMENT OF THE Clearly and concisely stated the purpose of Clearly stated the purpose of Stated the purpose of the
Incomplete and unfocused Absent, no evidence
PROBLEM the study the study study
Stated the hypothesis of the
C. HYPOTHESIS Clearly and concisely stated hypothesis Clearly stated the hypothesis Incomplete and unfocused Absent, no evidence
study
D. SIGNIFICANCE OF Stated only 4 importance of Stated only 3 importance of Stated only 2 importance of Stated only 1 importance of
Stated 5 or more importance of the study
THE STUDY the study the study the study the study
E. SCOPE AND Indicated the place where materials were
Only 3 variables were Only 2 variables were Only one variable were
LIMITATIONS OF collected, place of experimentation, limited Absent, no evidence
mentioned mentioned mentioned
THE STUDY treatments, duration of the study
Of all the terms listed, only Of all the terms listed, two Of all the terms listed, three Of all the terms listed, four or
F. DEFINITION OF
Defined all the terms operationally one is not defined terms are not defined terms are not defined more terms are not defined
TERMS
operationally operationally operationally operationally
CHAPTER II: REVIEW
Cited 8-9 RRL / related Cited 6-7 RRL / related Cited 4-5 RRL / related Cited less than 4 RRL /
OF RELATED Cited more than 10 RRL / related studies
studies studies studies related studies
LITERATURE
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY
Clearly and concisely stated and Clearly stated and explained Stated and defined only the Stated only the design used
A. RESEARCH DESIGN Absent, no evidence
explained the design used in the study the design used in the study design used in the study in the study
B. RESEARCH LOCALE
C. GENERA L PROCEDURES
1. Gathering of Materials
2. Preparation of treatments Numbers 1 to 5 were properly Only 4 were properly Only 3 were properly Only 2 were properly Only 1 were properly
3. Application of Treatments described/discussed described/discussed described/discussed described/discussed described/discussed
4. Proper waste Disposal
5. Statistical Tools / Analysis
REFERENCES Uses more than 20 references 15-19 references 10-14 references 6-10 references Less than 5 references
PROPER USE OF TENSES NO MISTAKES 1-10 MISTAKES 11-20 MISTAKES 21-30 MISTAKES MORE THAN 30 MISTAKES
TOTAL SCORE

Date submitted: ____________________

Names:

You might also like