Enamel Microabrasion in Pediatric Dentistry Case
Enamel Microabrasion in Pediatric Dentistry Case
net/publication/237645027
CITATIONS READS
3 861
4 authors, including:
Sandra Bussadori
Universidade Nove de Julho
398 PUBLICATIONS 3,506 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Evaluation of in-office tooth whitening treatment with violet LED: Protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Sandra Bussadori on 18 April 2014.
Postal address
Marcia Turolla Wanderley
Av. Professor Lineu Prestes, 2227, Cidade Universitária
05508-900 São Paulo – SP [Brasil]
[email protected]
Editorial
Artigos
para os autores
Instruções
Abstract
Enamel microabrasion technique is a conservative method that improves the appe-
arance of the tooth by restoring bright and superficial smoothness, without causing
significant structural loss. It is a safe method that may be used even in the treat-
ment of young children. This paper describes the microabrasion technique using
Opalustre® (Ultradent Products, Inc) applied over incipient carious lesions which
were remineralized but pigmented, aesthetically compromising deciduous teeth.
Key words: Deciduous tooth; Enamel microabrasion; Pediatric dentistry.
Case Report
A five-year-old male patient sought treat-
ment at the Specialization in Pediatric Dentistry
clinic of the São Paulo State Dentists’ Syndicate.
No relevant systemic alteration was observed
Figure 1: Initial clinical aspect of the upper
during anamnesis, except for the use of a medi-
left quadrant after isolation by rubber
cation containing ferrous sulfate. The mother dam. Notice the presence of inactive white
signed an informed consent, allowing the treat- spots that were remineralized and present
ment of her child. During clinical examination, different degrees of brown pigmentation
it was noted that the child presented great coro- added to small cavities
Editorial
Figure 6: Aspect at the one-month
maintenance appointment: observe that the
Figure 3: Mechanical removal of stains using
Artigos
characteristics obtained were maintained
a rubber cup at slow speed during 10 seconds
absence of pain or sensitivity on teeth that had
been treated with microabrasion.
Discussion
para os autores
The aesthetic treatment has not exclusive-
Instruções
ly concerned adults. Children and their parents
are becoming more and more appreciative of a
beautiful smile during childhood, seeking and
demanding resolutions to aesthetic problems.
Figure 4: Polishing of the teeth using felt According to Welbury and Shaw (1990)15, aesthet-
discs and paste at slow speed
ic problems may psychologically affect patients,
without need for aesthetic reconstruction. After especially teenagers, and may interfere in their
polishing the region with felt discs and paste social life.
at slow speed (Figure 4), a neutral fluoride gel Literature shows that enamel microabrasion
at 2% was applied during 1 minute (Figure 5). should be the first option of treatment because
Removal of the stains required 4 applications, it is a procedure that is less invasive and more
done in a single session, and a vitreous aspect conservative. It only requires a small amount of
of the surface was observed, with immediate structure removal, it doesn’t cause post-operative
aesthetic improvement. At the maintenance ap- pain or sensitivity, and, in the majority of cases,
pointment, after 1 month (Figure 6), it was ob- it can be done in a single session causing mini-
served that the shiny aspect and the surface mum discomfort to the patient1,7,10,16-18. Other ad-
smoothness were maintained and that there was vantages of this technique include: immediate,
permanent and lasting results due to the fact that inactive carious lesions because the technique
microabrasion involves the removal of the stain only causes a small amount of structure re-
instead of just covering up the stain or altering moval and it also forms a regular surface, thus
the enamel2,4,6,10-12,19; shorter time required for the decreasing the need for conventional restor-
procedure which is easy to execute2,6; elimination ative treatments 6,11,12,18. Because of the presence
of the need for dental cavity preparation or re- of superficial cavities on the buccal surfaces of
storative materials6,11-12,18; it does not cause injuries the deciduous canines and molars was chosen
either to the pulp or to the periodontal tissue2, 10. a more abrasive technique. Paic et al (2008)20
The association of an acid and an abrasive shows that Opalustre ® caused the highest tooth
agent may be used in the treatment of teenagers9, substance loss compared with other products,
11-12
and children who are at least 2 years old7,13 and Zuanon et al (2008)21 shows that mechanical
as long as protective measures are taken to keep technique (rubber cup attached to a low-speed
save the eyes and the soft tissue. Such measures handpiece) removed more enamel than manual
must be followed even when using a less concen- microabrasion using a plastic spatula. The com-
trated acid2,4,12. Therefore, rubber dam isolation bination of Opalustre ® and mechanical tech-
is mandatory during the procedure for not only nique resulted in a surface without roughness
does it protect soft tissues but it is also comfort- and discarded the need for restoration with
able, it stops material debris from falling into composite resin even in surfaces that presented
the mouth, it reduces contact with saliva, and it small cavities.
is a helpful tool for the behavior management of
young patients7.
In the clinical case reported, 4 applications Conclusion
of Opalustre ®, done in one session, were neces-
sary in order to remove the brown pigmentation The microabrasion technique using
found on the inactive carious lesions of primary Opalustre® (Ultradent Products, Inc) was effec-
maxillary teeth. After using the microabrasion tive in the removal of inactive carious white spot
technique, the coloration was improved and lesions that had been pigmented after remineral-
a shiny surface was obtained because, during ization and to produce a regular surface even in
the procedure, the demineralized layer is al- surfaces that presented small cavities.
most completely removed by the method18. Mild This technique presents a favorable and
surface abrasion of enamel demineralizes with lasting aesthetic result, without causing signifi-
simultaneous acid erosion leads to the forma-
cant enamel structural loss and without need for
tion of a compacted mineralized tissue within
cavity preparations. Microabrasion may be done
the organic areas, replacing the outer layer of
in a single session and it is safe to use even in
prism-rich enamel with a densely compacted
young children.
prism-free region. When light is reflected off
In order to obtain a favorable and lasting
this surface and refracted through it, it does so
aesthetic result, it is important to make an ade-
in a different manner than it would on an un-
quate diagnosis of the alterations found and the
treated surface, and these optical properties of
patient must be included in a preventive program
the newly micro-abraded surface camouflage
to reduce caries risk and activity.
the remaining subsurface stains 5,8. This vitreous
characteristic was observed in the clinical case
presented and is known as the “abrosion effect”5
or “enamel glaze”9.
References
Using microabrasion is also advantageous 1. McCloskey RJ. A technique for removal of fluorosis
for the treatment of small structural losses in stains. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984;109:63-4.
2. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Hydrochloric acid-pumice 12. Allen K, Agosta C, Estafan D. Using microabrasive
enamel surface abrasion for color modification: material to remove fluorosis stains. J Am Dent
results after six months. Quintessence Int. Assoc. 2004;135:319-23.
1986;17:335-41.
13. Croll TP, Segura A. Tooth color improvement for
3. Kamp AA. Removal of white spot lesions by children and teens: enamel microabrasion and
controlled acid-pumice abrasion. J Clin Orthod. dental bleaching. J Dent Child. 1996;63:17-22.
1989;23:690-3. 14. Da Silva SMB, Oliveira FS, Lanza CRM, Machado
4. Croll TP. Enamel microabrasion for removal of MAAM. Esthetic improvement following enamel
superficial dysmineralization and decalcification microabrasion on fluorotic teeth: a case report.
defects. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120:411-5. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:366-9.
5. Donly KJ, O’Neill M, Croll TP. Enamel 15. Welbrury RR, Shaw L. A simple technique for
Editorial
I. Technique and examples. Quintessence Int.
1986;17:81-7. 17. Wray A, Welbury R. UK National Clinical Guidelines
in Paediatric Dentistry: treatment of intrinsic
7. Sanglard-Peixoto LF, Oliveira LB, Zardetto CGDC,
discoloration in permanent anterior teeth in children
Corrêa MSNP. Enamel microabrasion: esthetic
and adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11:309-15.
treatment for iron sulfate stains. JBP – Rev Ibero-am
Odontopediatr Odontol Bebê. 2005;8:18-42 [abstract]. 18. Schimidlin PR, Göhring TN, Schug J, Lutz F.
Histological, morphological, profilometric and
8. Welbury RR, Carter NE. The hydrochloric acid-
optical changes of human tooth enamel after
pumice microabrasion technique in the treatment
Artigos
microabrasion. Am J Dent. 2003;16:4A-8A.
of post-orthodontic decalcification. Br J Orthod.
1993;20:181-5. 19. Bezerra AC, Leal SC, Otero AS, Garvina DB,
Cruvinel VR, Toledo OA. Enamel opacities removal
9. Croll TP, Helpin ML. Enamel microabrasion: a new using two different acids: an in vivo comparison. J
approach. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12:64-71. Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;29:147-50.
10. Ashkenazi M, Sarnat H. Microabrasion of teeth with 20. Paic M, Sener B, Schug J, Schmidlin PR. Effects of
para os autores
discoloration resembling hypomaturation enamel microabrasion on substance loss, surface roughness,
Instruções
defects: four-year follow up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. and colorimetric changes on enamel in vitro.
2000;25:29-34. Quintessence Int. 2008;39(6):517-22
11. Price RBT, Loney RW, Doyle MG, Mouling MB. 21. Zuanon AC, Santos-Pinto L, Azevedo ER, Lima
An evaluation of a technique to remove stains LM. Primary tooth enamel loss after manual
from teeth using microabrasion. J Am Dent Assoc. and mechanical microabrasion. Pediatr Dent.
2003;134:1066-71. 2008;30(5):420-3.