Crystalline Orientation of Bimno Thin Films Grown by Rf-Sputtering
Crystalline Orientation of Bimno Thin Films Grown by Rf-Sputtering
www.elsevier.com/locate/apsusc
Abstract
BiMnO3 thin films were deposited by means of rf-sputtering onto [1 0 0] oriented SrTiO3 substrates. X-ray diffraction measurements revealed
epitaxial growth with [0 0 l]m orientation in the monoclinic structure representation, equivalent to the ½1 1 1pc direction of the pseudocubic cationic
lattice. This [0 0 l]m orientation was obtained in a wide deposition parameters range. Preliminary magnetization measurements suggest that these
films do not present ferromagnetism below the bulk Curie temperature, T C ¼ 105 K.
# 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction BiMnO3 structure is monoclinic (m), space group C2, with unit
cell parameters: a ¼ 9:5323 Å, b ¼ 5:6064 Å, c ¼ 9:8535 Å
Multiferroic [1,2] materials are scarce and combine at least and b ¼ 110:667 . A unit cell of the monoclinic structure
two of the properties of ferromagnetism, ferroelectricity and representation is shown in Fig. 1. It can be seen that there are
ferroelasticity. These materials are intensively studied at three inequivalent Mn atoms arranged in parallel layers in
present because they offer the possibility of realizing a whole the monoclinic [1 0 0]m and [0 1 0]m directions. The
range of new applications. Therefore big interest exists on its relation between these two possible ways of visualizing this
synthesis in thin film form which also would allow for its structure consists in ½2 0 2m ’ ½0 1 0pc ; ½0 4 0m ’ ½2 0 2pc ;
integration on micro- or nano-sized applications. ½1 1 1m ’ ½1 0 0pc ¼ ½0 0 1pc ; ½0 0 4m ’ ½1 1 1pc , etc.
Bulk BiMnO3 is an insulating multiferroic perovskite
material which in bulk form presents both ferroelectricity 2. Experimental details
below T E 550 K, and ferromagnetism below T C 105 K,
with an interaction between them [3]. Unfortunately it is The BiMnO3 films were deposited onto [1 0 0] SrTiO3
difficult to synthesize in bulk form because it requires high single-crystalline substrates by magnetron rf-sputtering in a
pressures (about 6 GPa) [4] and thus only recently single- 90% Ar/10% O2 atmosphere, starting from a Bi rich ceramic
crystalline samples have been obtained [5]. For this reason target of composition Bi1.1MnOx. The small Bi excess was
measurements performed using only either polycrystalline added intentionally in order to compensate for the high Bi
samples or thin films can be found in the literature. volatility, which tends to produce a Bi deficient film. The target
The BiMnO3 structure was initially identified [6,7], as being was sintered from a stoichiometric mixture of Bi2O3 and MnO2
a triclinically distorted pseudocubic (pc) perovskite lattice, of composition Bi1.2MnO3.8. This mixture was pre-reacted in
with the following cell parameters: a ¼ c ¼ 3:935 Å, atmospheric air at 700 C for 1 day. In order to obtain a denser
a ¼ g ¼ 918280 . However, recent detailed neutron and electron target, polyvinyl butyral (PVB) was added to the reacted
diffraction measurements at room temperature [8], as well as powder in a 2.26 wt%. The PVB was removed by a 5 h
high-temperature X-ray diffraction [9], determined that the annealing at 500 C in air. Finally, the pellet was sintered at
750 C, in a hermetic furnace with a static oxygen atmosphere
for 4 h. A small crucible containing Bi2O3 was placed inside
* Corresponding author. the furnace chamber in order to provide a high Bi partial
E-mail address: [email protected] (E.E. Kaul). pressure to avoid Bi loss during the sintering process. A
0169-4332/$ – see front matter # 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.07.012
E.E. Kaul et al. / Applied Surface Science 254 (2007) 160–163 161
In published works using the PLD technique, the usual cube- microscopy (HRTEM) experiments are under way in order to
over-cube epitaxial growth was obtained for [1 0 0] SrTiO3 confirm this hypothesis.
substrates. However, in this work a [0 0 1]m texture, correspond-
ing to a [1 1 1] orientation in the pseudocubic lattice, was found. Acknowledgements
In Fig. 3 we show a view of the BiMnO3 structure along the
monoclinic [0 0 l] direction. This atomic arrangement has to be Work partially supported by ANPCyT PICT2003-03-13289
matched to the square-like ion arrangement of SrTiO3 along the and Fundación Antorchas. EK, NH and JG also at CONICET,
cubic [1 0 0] direction. Since the two Mn–Mn distances (of Argentina.
about 5.529 and 5.606 Å) are quite larger than the SrTiO3 cell
parameter of 3.9046 Å but closer to its diagonal distance of about
5.522 Å, we believe that the epitaxy might be achieved as shown References
in Fig. 4. The Mn octahedra lie close to the underlying Ti
[1] M. Fiebeg, V.V. Eremenko, I.E. Chupis (Eds.), Magnetoelectric Interac-
octahedra. With little rotational and/or displacement distortions, tion Phenomena in Crystals, Nato Science Series, Series II, vol. 164,
the oxygens at the surface will coincide with the apical oxygens Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
of the Ti octahedra. High-resolution transmission electron [2] M. Fiebig, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 (2005) R123–R152.
E.E. Kaul et al. / Applied Surface Science 254 (2007) 160–163 163
[3] W. Prellier, M.P. Singh, P. Murugavel, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17 (2005) [9] H. Faqir, H. Chiba, M. Kikuchi, Y. Syono, M. Mansori, P. Satre, A.
R803–R832 (and references therein). Sebaoun, J. Solid State Chem. 142 (1999) 113–119.
[4] Z.H. Chi, C.J. Xiao, S.M. Feng, F.Y. Li, C.Q. Jin, X.H. Wang, R.Z. Chen, [10] O. Nakamura, E.E. Fullerton, J. Guimpel, I.K. Schuller, Appl. Phys. Lett.
L.T. Li, J. Appl. Phys. 98 (1999) 103519. 60 (1992) 120.
[5] M. Azuma, T. Saito, S. Ishiwata, I. Yamada, K. Kohsaka, H. Takagi, M. [11] A.F. Moreira dos Santos, A.K. Cheetham, W. Tian, X. Pan, Y. Jia,
Takano, Physica C392–C396 (2003) 22–28. N.J. Murphy, J. Letteri, D.G. Schlom, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 (2004) 91–
[6] F. Sugawara, S. Iida, Y. Syono, S. Akimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 20 (1965) 93.
1529. [12] M. Gajek, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, K. Bouzehouane, S. Fusil,
[7] F. Sugawara, S. Iida, Y. Syono, S. Akimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 25 (1968) M. Varela, J. Fontcuberta, A. Fert, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005)
1553–1558. 020406(R).
[8] T. Atou, H. Chiba, K. Ohoyama, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Syono, J. Solid State [13] W. Eerenstein, F.D. Morrison, J.F. Scott, N.D. Mathur, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87
Chem. 145 (1999) 639–642. (2005) 101906.