39 fr-2020-482 Vuleticarticulo.2021-Cefeina
39 fr-2020-482 Vuleticarticulo.2021-Cefeina
FULL PAPER
Spectrophotometric determining of caffeine content in the selection of teas, soft
and energy drinks available on the Croatian market
1,*
Vuletić, N., 2Bardić, L. and 1Odžak, R.
1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Split, R. Boškovića 33, 21 000 Split, Croatia
2
University Department of Forensic Sciences, University of Split, R. Boškovića 33, 21000 Split, Croatia
Article history:
Abstract
Received: 4 September 2020
Received in revised form: 19
October 2020
This study aimed to determine concentrations of caffeine in the samples of the selected
Accepted: 17 December 2020 brands of teas, soft carbonated and energy drinks that are commercially available on the
Available Online: 3 April Croatian market. Quantitative analysis of caffeine content in the chosen beverage samples
2021 was done with UV/Vis spectrophotometric method. Chloroform was used as the solvent
Keywords:
and concentrations of caffeine were measured at the wavelength of 274 nm for three
Caffeine, samples of each of the selected beverages. Among the analyzed tea samples the highest
Tea, caffeine concentration was found in Franck's Black Tea (1471.021 ppm) and the lowest in
Soft drinks, Naturavita's Green Tea with Ginger (588.138 ppm). Between the analyzed carbonated soft
Energy drinks,
Spectrophotometry drinks, the highest caffeine concentration was measured in Fresh Cola (136.036 ppm) and
the lowest in Sky Cola (48.198 ppm). The highest caffeine concentration in the analyzed
DOI: energy drink samples was measured in Hell energy drink (394.670 ppm) while the lowest
https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.5(2).482
was in Coca Cola Energy drink (173.574 ppm). The results of this study gave preliminary
information about caffeine levels in often consumed teas, carbonated soft drinks and
energy drinks in Croatia. The caffeine content in the analyzed teas and drink samples in
this study was under the allowed one except for Red Bull and Hell.
*Corresponding author. eISSN: 2550-2166 / © 2021 The Authors. Published by Rynnye Lyan Resources
Email: [email protected]
326 Vuletić et al. / Food Research 5 (2) (2021) 325 - 330
drinks like colas. It is deliberately added to these drinks coordination (Stranton and Gray, 1995). Acute caffeine
because of their taste and to cause the addiction to a overdose, usually more than 250 mg (more than 2-3 cups
drink (Khalid et al., 2016). The caffeine content in soft of cooked coffee) can lead to the state of overstimulated
FULL PAPER
drinks varies depending on drink type. It can be from 10 CNS and caffeine intoxication as well (Khalid et al.,
to 50 mg of caffeine per serving portion (Violeta et al., 2016).
2010). US Food and Drug Administration restricted the
maximum amount of caffeine in carbonated drinks to 6 There are many advantages of caffeine consumption.
mg/oz. The allowed amount of caffeine in soft drinks can It is used to reduce physical fatigue and for its medical
be in the range of 30 to 72 mg/335 mL (12 oz) or 8,45 to characteristics also (Amos-Tautua et al., 2014). It can be
20,28 mg/100 mL (Amos-Tautua et al., 2014). used in combination with certain pain relievers for
treating migraines (Khalid et al., 2016). In the big
Energy drinks such as Red Bull, Monster etc. are non research that included 217 883 people were shown that
-alcoholic drinks that contain caffeine and herbal extracts there was lower kidney stones formation if caffeine was
of guarana, ginseng or Ginkgo biloba, B vitamins, amino consumed (Ferraro et al., 2013). Caffeine can induce hair
acid derivatives like carnitine and sugar derivatives growth, protects from eyelid spasm, cataract and
(ribose, glucuronolactone) (Boyle and Castillo, 2006). It prevents skin cancer. It can reduce the risk of some types
has been noted that there is 80 to 350 mg of caffeine and of cancer like liver cancer or colon cancer. It reduces the
35 g of processed sugar in 8-oz per serving portion of risk of Type 2 diabetes and Parkinson's disease (Graham,
energy drink (Clauson et al., 2008). One can of 1978).
commercially available energy drink contains 80 to 280
mg of caffeine depending on the size of a can (Weinberg There are many disadvantages to caffeine. It can
and Bealer, 2004). cause anxiety if taken in the amount of 300 mg or more
(Smith, 2002). Caffeine increases the concentration of
Drinks which contain caffeine like coffee, tea, soft dopamine in the brain and that eases depression. It
and energy drinks are very popular. Caffeine is the most accelerates bone tissue loss in postmenopausal older
frequently used psychoactive matter worldwide. Adults women. It can cause auditory hallucinations. If in
take 3/4 of a daily amount of caffeine through coffee. overdose, caffeine causes high blood pressure,
Usually, a cup of coffee contains 100 mg of caffeine. restlessness, insomnia, accelerated pulse, nausea,
Even decaf coffee is not without caffeine. It can contain increased urination, cardiac palpitations, gastrointestinal
12 mg of caffeine (Frary et al., 2005). A cup of tea disorders (diarrhea) and dizziness (Graham, 1978).
contains 85 mg of caffeine. The effect of caffeine on the
human body can appear 15 minutes after ingestion and The main goal of this study was to determine the
can last for hours. Children get caffeine from soft and concentrations of caffeine in different samples of
energy drinks in the fast-growing beverage market commercially available types of teas, carbonated soft
(Kamijo et al., 1999). drinks and energy drinks in the supermarkets in Croatia.
Passion Punch, Hell Strong Apple, Coca-Cola Energy) content was heated and then boiled for 10 mins. A total
were purchased from the local markets in Croatia. of 2 g of sodium carbonate was added to each sample for
precipitating tannins. Samples were filtered and filtrates
FULL PAPER
2.3 Instrument were concentrated to 5 mL by heating. From the given
The UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Secomam, UVi volume caffeine was extracted by adding 5 mL of
Light-XTD5, Ales, France) was used for the analysis of chloroform in the separatory funnel. Caffeine was
caffeine in different samples of teas, soft and energy extracted by stirring in the separatory funnel for a few
drinks. minutes. The lower caffeine-containing layer was
separated and analyzed for caffeine content with UV/Vis
2.4 Wavelength selection spectrophotometer. 0.1 mL of each tea extract was mixed
with 10 mL of chloroform and placed in a quartz cuvette.
The wavelength at which caffeine absorbs maximum
Absorbance was measured at 274 nm. Three samples of
was determined by scanning the range of 190-400 nm.
each brand of tea were analyzed for caffeine content.
The wavelength at which caffeine absorbs maximum was
Average values are given in Table 2.
found to be 274 nm which was selected for further
analyses. The same wavelength was reported by Rehman Table 2. Caffeine contents of tea and beverage samples
and Ashraf, 2017 (Rehman et al., 2017). Caffeine
Sample
Sample name Mark concentration
type
2.5 Calibration solutions preparation (ppm)
Franck Green Tea T1 1209.76
Caffeine stock solution (100 ppm) was prepared by Franck Black Tea T2 1471.021
dissolving 0.01 g of recrystallized caffeine in 100 mL of Naturavita Green Tea T3 904.204
chloroform in the volumetric flask. From the caffeine Naturavita Green Tea T4 588.138
stock solution following dilutions were prepared: 1 ppm, Teas
with Ginger
5 ppm, 10 ppm, 15 ppm, 20 ppm and 25 ppm. Their Agristar Green Tea T5 1423.724
absorbances were measured at the wavelength of 274 nm Agristar Black Tea T6 1413.964
in quartz cuvettes three times for each dilution. Average and Orange
values of measured absorbances are given in Table 1. Dar Vitalis Eko Green T7 625.676
The absorbance values were used to make the calibration Tea
line for caffeine content analysis as shown in Figure 2. Coca-Cola SD1 102.252
Coca-Cola Zero SD2 95.12
Table 1. Absorbance of calibration solutions of caffeine
Pepsi Cola SD3 86.486
No Concentration (ppm) Absorbance Carbonated
Fresh Cola SD4 136.036
1 1 0.143 soft drinks
2 5 0.437 Fresh Cola Light SD5 49.7
3 10 0.644 Sky Cola SD6 48.198
4 15 0.776 Cockta SD7 0
5 20 1.079 Red Bull ED1 350.751
6 25 1.319 Monster ED2 317.342
Energy
Hell ED3 394.67
drinks
Burn ED4 252.778
Coca-Cola Energy ED5 173.574
each brand of drink were analyzed for caffeine content. It is visible in the present study that the caffeine content
Average values are given in Table 2. in analyzed carbonated soft drinks is under the allowed
one. It is observed that the caffeine concentrations in the
FULL PAPER
Figure 3. Chart showing caffeine content in the tea and beverage samples
eISSN: 2550-2166 © 2021 The Authors. Published by Rynnye Lyan Resources
Vuletić et al. / Food Research 5 (2) (2021) 325 - 330 329
some adults may affect sleep. When healthy adults Roseland, J.M., Brandt, M., Dwyer, J.T., Picciano,
consume caffeine at a dose of 400 mg throughout the day M.F., Saldanha, L.G., Fisher, K.D., Yetley, E., Betz,
(about 5.7 mg/kg bw per day) they do not need to worry J.M. and Douglass, L. (2007). The caffeine content
FULL PAPER
about safety. For pregnant women, EFSA recommends of dietary supplements commonly purchased in the
that caffeine intakes from all sources should be up to 200 US: analysis of 53 products having caffeine
mg per day consumed throughout the day. A safety level containing ingredients. Analytical and Bioanalytical
of 3 mg/kg bw of caffeine is also recommended for Chemistry, 389(1), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/
children and adolescents. A cup of black tea (220 mL) s00216-007-1437-2
approximately contains 50 mg of caffeine so one could Atomssa, T. and Gholap, A.V. (2011). Characterization
consume up to 4 cups per day. Since caffeine content of caffeine and determination of caffeine in tea
depends on the type of tea and since portion size varies leaves using UV-Visible spectrometer. African
within and between countries one should be careful with Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 5(1), 1-8.
caffeine intakes.
Boyle, M. and Castillo, V.D. (2006). Monster on the
loose. Fortune, 154, 116-122.
4. Conclusion Caballero, B., Finglas, P. and Toldra, F. (2015).
UV/Vis spectrophotometric method applied in this Encyclopedia of Food and Health, p. 561. USA:
study for the quantitative analysis of the caffeine Elsevier Science.
concentrations in tea and drink samples is sensitive, Clauson, K.A., Shields, K.M., McQueen, C.E. and
precise and correct. Additional advantages of this Persad, N. (2008). Safety issues associated with
method are that it is inexpensive as well as easy to commercially available energy drinks. Journal of the
perform. Despite the relatively small number of the American Pharmacist Association, 48(3), e55-e67.
analyzed samples, the results of this study gave a https://doi.org/10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07055
preliminary information about the caffeine content often
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel on
consumed in teas, soft and energy drinks in Croatia.
Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies. (2015).
The results of the current study led to a conclusion Scientific opinion on the safety of caffeine. EFSA
that the caffeine content should be indicated on the Journal, 13(5), 4102. https://doi.org/10.2903/
product labels especially due to the great popularity and j.efsa.2015.4102
easy accessibility of caffeine-containing drinks. Since Ferraro, P.M., Taylor, E.N., Gambaro, G. and Curhan,
caffeine can be a cause for potential health concerns, G.C. (2013). Soda and other beverages and the risk
precise quantities stated on the labels of caffeinated of kidney stones. Clinical Journal of American
beverages should be highlighted in the interest of those Society of Nephrology, 8(8), 1389-1395.
who drink them. It is necessary to work on raising https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.1166111
awareness among those who drink caffeinated beverages Frary, C.D., Johnson, R.K. and Wang, M.Q. (2005).
about the amounts of caffeine they consume. Food sources and intakes of caffeine in the diets of
persons in the Unated States. Journal of American
Conflict of interest Dietetic Association, 105(1), 110-113. https://
The authors declare no conflict of interest. doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2004.10.027
Gerald, I., Arthur, D.E. and Adedayo, A. (2014).
Determination of caffeine in beverages: a review.
Acknowledgments
American Journal of Engineering Research, 3(8),
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science 124-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/
and Education of the Republic of Croatia as a j.petrol.2014.09.036
part of Multiannual Financing intended for institutions.
Graham, D.M. (1978). Caffeine – It's identity, dietary
sources, intake and biological effects. Nutrition
References Reviews, 36(4), 97-102. DOI: https://
Amos-Tautua, B., Martin, W. and Diepreye, E.R.E. doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1978.tb03717.x
(2014). Ultra-violet spectrophotometric Heckman, M.A., Weil, J. and Gonzales de Mejia, E.
determination of caffeine in soft and energy drinks (2010). Caffeine (1,3,7 trimethylxanthine) in foods: a
available in Yenagoa, Nigeria. Advance Journal of comprehensive review on consumption,
Food Science and Technology, 6(2), 155-158. https:// functionality, safety and regulatory matters. Journal
doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.6.2 of Food Science 75(3), R77-R87. https://
Andrews, K., Schweitzer, A., Zhao, C., Holden, J.M., doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01561.x
Kamijo, Y., Soma, K., Asari, Y. and Ohwada, T. (1999). Journal of Epidemiology, 142(12), 1322-1329.
Severe rhabdomyolysis following massive ingestion https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117600
of oolong tea: caffeine intoxication with coexisting
FULL PAPER