Scribd
Upload
85 views

Position Paper Admin

This document is a position paper submitted by the National Police Commission against SPO1 regarding a complaint of conduct unbecoming a police officer. It summarizes the statement of the case, parties involved, facts of the incident, and argues that the respondent should be found guilty based on violating rules of ethical conduct and promoting integrity in public service. It requests that evidence submitted by the respondent be deemed inadmissible and that an appropriate penalty be imposed according to law.

Uploaded by

reason
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
85 views

Position Paper Admin

This document is a position paper submitted by the National Police Commission against SPO1 regarding a complaint of conduct unbecoming a police officer. It summarizes the statement of the case, parties involved, facts of the incident, and argues that the respondent should be found guilty based on violating rules of ethical conduct and promoting integrity in public service. It requests that evidence submitted by the respondent be deemed inadmissible and that an appropriate penalty be imposed according to law.

Uploaded by

reason
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION


Regional Office No.
___________________________________________
__________________________________________

National Police Commission


Nominal Complainant,

- versus -

SPO1
Respondent.

x------------------------------------------------- ---------------x

POSITION PAPER

Nominal complainant, through the undersigned Special Prosecutor, respectfully submits


this Position Paper and states:

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

II. PARTIES TO THIS CASE

III. BRIEF STATEMENT OF FACTS

(Culled from the Complaint Affidavit of Mark Singian y Gopez dated September 16, 2016
marked as Exhibit “C”)

IV. ISSUE/S

Whether or not the respondent is guilty of Conduct Unbecoming of a Police Officer under
NAPOLCOM MC No. 2016-002?

V. ARGUMENTS AND DISCUSSIONS

It is the policy of the State to promote a high standard of ethics in public service. 1 To
further emphasize this, the Philippine National Police promulgated the PNP Ethical Doctrine
which prescribes the moral and ethical guidance that its members must abide, adhere to and
internalize. The doctrine provides that PNP members are expected to serve with utmost
responsibility, integrity, morality, loyalty and efficiency with due respect to human rights (italics

1 Section 2 of Republic Act No. 6713

1|Page
supplied) and dignity as hallmark of a democratic society. Moreover, the doctrine dictates that
PNP members are required to act in a manner that would reflect best on the PNP.

VI. PRAYER

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that the pieces of evidence submitted by


respondent, particularly the Affidavits of Desistance, be deemed inadmissible in evidence and
that respondent be found liable for Conduct Unbecoming of a Police Officer and meted with the
appropriate penalty provided under the law.

Other relief which this Office may deem just and equitable are likewise prayed for.

Special Prosecutor

2|Page

You might also like