Metabolomics: The Study of Metabolites
Metabolomics: The Study of Metabolites
ABSTRACT
Article Received on
31 Jan. 2020, Metabolomics is the newest ―omics‖ approach for analysis of
Revised on 20 Feb. 2020, metabolites. Metabolomics measure the metabolites which are present
Accepted on 11 March 2020
DOI: 10.20959/wjpps20204-15875 in the biological samples to obtain ‗metabolomes‘. One of the most
popular aims of metabolomic study is biomarker discovery. This
biomarker helps us in identifying the disease state. Various analytical
*Corresponding Author
techniques are used for metabolite measurements. Most commonly
Nutan Rao
Department of Quality used technique is mass spectrometry due to its high specificity and
Assurance, Oriental College excellent limit of detection. Metabolomics has several applications.
of Pharmacy, Sanpada (E), Typical data handling practices, data outputs and instrumentation for
Navi Mumbai-400705,
these experiments are introduced in this article. Description of
India.
pharmacogenomics and pharmacoproteomics is also provided. A case
study involving the use of metabolomics approach is also described in this article.
INTRODUCTION
Current clinical practice depends upon on the prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases
using methods determined and averaged for the specific diseased cohort/population. The
control and eradication of a number of diseases are subsequently hampered in many
individuals due to misdiagnosis, treatment failure, relapse, and adverse drug reactions. These
occurrences can be explained by individual variation in the genome, transcriptome, proteome,
and metabolome of a patient. With the intention of developing personalized approaches to
diagnose diseases and for treatment, various ―omics‖ approaches have analysed the influence
of these factors on a molecular level. Metabolomics is the newest addition to the ―omics‖
system which represents the complete set of metabolites in a biological cell, tissue, organ or
organism, which are the end products of cellular processes. The metabolites profile of two or
more disease phenotypes are compared which helps to identify biomarkers. These biomarkers
then are used to develop personalized medicines. Biomarkers are also used for diagnostic and
treatment of diseases. These biomarkers serves as a functional end-point of physiological and
pathophysiological processes illustrating both environmental influences like nutrition,
exercise or medication and genetic predisposition.[1,2]
The systematic identification and quantification of the small molecule, metabolic products
(the metabolome) of a biological system (cell, tissue, organ, biological fluid, or organism) at
a specific point in time is known as metabolomics.[3,4]
The difference between the two terms i.e. between metabolomics and metabonomics is that
metabolomics is more associated with mass spectrometry-based techniques and
metabonomics is associated with NMR spectroscopy, this is simply because of usages
amongst different groups that have popularized the different terms.
Although in different fields metabolomics study has achieved great successes, measuring
thousand of biological samples in one study is still a challenge to ensure high quality of data
due to analytical variances, environmental fluctuation and instrument drift.[5,6] When large-
scale metabolomics is performed following issues should be covered.[7] Fig.1
1. To increase throughput sample pretreatment method should be highly efficient.
2. For ensuring rich metabolic profiling information and high analytical throughput, data
collection method is critical.
3. Among different batches and different instruments data repeatability and integration are
the key factors in large-scale metabolomics study.
PHARMACOGENOMICS
Pharmacogenomics is a platform that combines pharmacology and genomics. Genetic
polymorphisms determine inter-individual fluctuation in the pharmacodynamics and
pharmacokinetics of pharmacological agents is the main concept of this approach.[17] On the
ability of an organism to respond to a specific medication pharmacogenomics identifies the
effects of individual genetic variation. Pharmacogenomics promotes the comparison of
human genomes and predicts diseases. According to individual genetic makeup it helps to
identify personalized pharmaceutical therapy.[17,18]
PHARMACOPROTEOMICS
Pharmacoproteomics basic principle is to identify and quantify the protein content in
biosamples under different pathophysiological condition and to detect the changes that occurs
in protein before and after therapy.[18]
Minimal sample preparation is required for NMR (including direct analysis of intact tissue
specimen).[23] Biofluids easiest to work with are serum, plasma, urine, saliva etc.Maximum
experience with serum and urine samples. Collection of plasma and serum requires treatment
in the blood samples.For serum the whole blood is collected in test tube, allowed the blood to
clot by leaving it undisturbed at room temperature and the clot is removed by centrifuging.
The resultant supernatant is designated serum.For plasma the whole blood is collected in the
anticoagulant treated tubes, this stimulates white blood cells to release cytokines;cells are
removed from plasma by using refrigerated centrifuge. The resulting supernatant is
designated plasma.[2]
SEPRATION TECHNIQUES
Chromatography: A process in which a chemical mixture carried by a liquid or gas is
separated into components as a result of differential distribution of the solutes as they flow
over or around a stationary liquid or solid phase is known as chromatography.[24]
The chemicals which exits the end of the column, they are electronically detected and
identified. The stationary phase in the column separate different components, causing each
one to exit the column at a different time (retention time). Fig.4
HYPHENATED TECHNIQUES
Various Mass spectrometry (MS) methods in combination with separation techniques such as
liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC) have been used in multiple
metabolomics investigations.[29-34]
Advantages of LC-MS: Wide metabolite coverage offered, Compatibility with the analysis
of Biosamples, high sensitivity and specificity of the analytical mode, ready availability of
instrumentation.[37-41]
DETECTION TECHNIQUES
For biofluid metabolic profiling mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance are the
most frequently used methods.[1,43,44]
(value). For most ions, the charge is one and thus,mass to charge ratio is simply the molecular
mass of the ion. The ion then passes through magnetic and electric fields to reach detector
where they are detected and signals are recorded to give mass spectra.[28]
To get an overview of the data, certain unsupervised methods are used to highlight trends in
the data and grouping or differentiation of various sample sets, and additionally to identify
potential outlier samples and batch effects. When using these unsupervised methods, samples
are not assigned to specific groups (for example, disease and control) prior to the statistical
analysis, allowing the analyst to determine whether or not the samples are naturally
differentiated or grouped based on their analysed metabolite profiles.[45]
Principle component analysis (PCA) is the most commonly used unsupervised method. PCA
reduces the dimension of the input data matrix by calculating a sum of the compound
(metabolite) concentrations detected in each sample and in terms of principal components
(PCs) these is expressed. In this PC1 gives the most variation in the data and PC2 gives the
next highest variation, etc. On the basis of the analysed metabolomes these PCs subsequently
serve as coordinates on a scatter plot and provide an overview of the samples and how they
relate to each other.[48] Fig.9.
To identify potential biomarker candidates, supervised methods are very useful because they
helps to detect elusive differences between similar samples. To force classification,
supervised methods can be more appropriate. For recognizing supervised pattern the methods
which are used are partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA),[49] soft independent
modeling of class analogies (SIMCA), orthogonal signal correction (OSC), genetic
programming and neural networks. To extend the power of supervised methods into
metabolomics studies, OSC and PLS-DA have recently been combined.[50]
APPLICATIONS
Agricultural
The development of new pesticides is critical to reach the growing demands on farming. By
allowing us to get a glimpse of genetically modified plants complex biochemistry via
informative snapshots acquired at different time points during plant development
metabolomics helps us to estimate associated risks. Plant metabolomics is
markedlyinteresting because of the range and functions of primary and secondary metabolites
in plants. About 300 definite metabolites could be routinely identified per sample a decade
ago, and the number is gradually increasing over time.[51]
Biomarker discovery
Biomarker discovery is another area where metabolomics involves decision making. Signals
of the medical state observed outside the patient which can be measured precisely and
reproducibly is biomarker. In metabolomics, biomarkers are small molecules that can be used
to differentiate two groups of samples, typically a disease and control group. For example, a
metabolite present in disease samples, but not in healthy individuals would be classed as a
biomarker. Samples collected from urine, saliva, bile, or seminal fluid contain highly
informative metabolites, therefore for the purpose of biomarker discoveryit can be promptly
analysed through metabolomics fingerprinting or profiling.[51-55]
Personalized medicine
Personalized medicine, the ultimate customization of healthcare, requires metabolomics for
rapid medical diagnosis to identify disease. In healthcare, we currently use classical
biochemical tests to estimate individual metabolite concentrations to identify disease states
(e.g. the blood-glucose level in the case of diabetes).[51] Metabolomics offers the power for
the rapid identification of hundreds of metabolites, enabling us to identify these disease states
much earlier.[48,56] By analysing the metabolite profile of a patient prior to dosing one can
predict some aspects of drug metabolism.[57]
CASE STUDY
Hypertension[58,59]
One of the most common chronic diseases, which affect about one billion people worldwide,
is hypertension.[60] Although there are various types of antihypertensive drugs available in
market, but only about 40% of hypertensive patients have optimally controlled blood
pressure.[61] Between individuals and even in races the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs
varies greatly. However, little information about the mechanisms underlying the different
responses of individuals to antihypertensive drugs is known. Currently, the emerging
metabolomicstudy is helping to reveal the reasons for the variations in drug efficacy. This
metabolomic study is carried out by using GC-MS method. A metabolomic assessment of the
individual variations to antihypertensive drugs, i.e. for atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide, was
performed with non-targeted metabolomics approach in white and black subjects.[62]
Atenolol belongs to the beta-receptor blocker family and is a classical antihypertensive drug
and Hydrochlorothiazide is a thiazide diuretic.[63] Plasma samples at baseline and post-
treatment of atenolol, and hydrochlorothiazide therapy were collected. As expected, the
majority of the hypertensive subjects experienced an obvious reduction in blood pressure;
there were significant differences in blood pressure reduction between white and black
subjects with both treatments. The metabolomic study revealed that the baseline levels of 5-
methoxytryptamine were negatively correlated with the change in blood pressure of white
participants with atenolol treatment, while seven metabolites at baseline were associated with
that in black participants. The baseline levels of arachidonic acid and other unknown
metabolites were positively correlated with the change in blood pressure of white participants
with hydrochlorothiazide treatment. Multivariable models were constructed to predict the
antihypertensive response for all participants treated with either atenolol or
hydrochlorothiazide on the basis of baseline metabolomic profiles.
From both the discovery and validation datasets, statistically significant results were obtained
in the multivariable models.With increase in number of subjects it was observed that there is
increase in predictive power in models.The subsequent analysis revealed that there are
numbers of metabolic pathways that were altered jointly or individually in both white and
black participants after antihypertensive drug therapy implying mechanisms causing the
different outcomes of drug therapy.
CONCLUSION
The knowledge obtained from metabolomics studies are used for development of
personalized medicines. Metabolomics provides the information of pathogenesis of diseases,
effects of diet or applied drugs. One of the most popular aim of metabolomic study is
biomarker discovery. By combination of biochemistry, analytical chemistry, bioinformatics,
medicine etc, metabolomics represents a rapidly expanding and interdisciplinary field of
science. This metabolomics study provides fresh insight into pathogenesis of diseases, effects
of diet or applied drugs.
REFERENCE
1. Koen N, Preez ID, Loots DT. Chapter Three: Metabolomics and Personalized Medicine.
Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol, 2016; 102: 53-78.
2. Klupczynska A, Derezinski P, Kokot ZJ. Metabolomics in Medical Sciences- Trends,
Challenges and Perspective. Acta Pol Pharm, 2015; 72(4): 629-41.
3. Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E. 'Metabonomics': understanding the metabolic
responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical
analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica, 1999; 29(11): 1181-89.
4. Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dormann P, Altmann T, Trethewey RN, Willmitzer L. Metabolite
profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol, 2000; 18(11): 1157-61.
5. Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, Begley P, Zelena E, Francis-McIntyre S, Anderson N, et al.
Procedures for large-scale metabolic profiling of serum and plasma using gas
chromatography and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Nature Prot,
2011; 6(7): 1060-83.
6. Dunn WB, Wilson ID, Nicholls AW, Broadhurst D. The importance of experimental
design and QC samples in large-scale and MS-driven untargeted metabolomic studies of
humans. Bioanalysis, 2012; 4(18): 2249-64.
7. Xinyu L, Lina Z, Xianzhe S, Guowang X. New advances in analytical methods for mass
spectrometry-based large-scale metabolomics study. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115665.
8. Patti GJ, Yanes O, Siuzdak G. Metabolomics: The apogee of the omics trilogy. Nat Rev
Mol Cell Biol, 2012; 13: 263–69.
9. Trifonova O, Lokhov P, Archakov A. Postgenomics diagnostics: Metabolomics
approaches to human blood profiling. OMICS, 2013; 17: 550–59.
10. Liu X, Locasale JW. Metabolomics: A Primer. Trends Biochem Sci, 2017; 42(4): 274-84.
11. Link H, Fuhrer T, Gerosa L, Zamboni N, Sauer U. Real-time metabolome profiling of the
metabolic switch between starvation and growth. Nat Methods, 2015; 12(11): 1091–7.
12. Bennett BD, Yuan J, Kimball EH, Rabinowitz JD. Absolute quantitation of intracellular
metabolite concentrations by an isotope ratio-based approach. Nat Protoc, 2008; 3(8):
1299–311.
13. Park JO, Rubin SA, Xu YF, Amador-Noguez D, Fan J, Shlomi T, et al. Metabolite
concentrations, fluxes and free energies imply efficient enzyme usage. Nat Chem Biol,
2016; 12(7): 482–9.
14. Jain M, Nilsson R, Sharma S, Madhusudhan N, Kitami T, Souza AL, et al. Metabolite
profiling identifies a key role for glycine in rapid cancer cell proliferation. Science, 2012;
336(6084): 1040–4.
15. Breitling R, Ritchie S, Goodenowe D, Stewart ML, Barrett MP. Ab initio prediction of
metabolic networks using Fourier transform mass spectrometry data. Metabolomics,
2006; 2(3): 155–64.
16. Gika HG, Zisi C, Theodoridis G, Wilson ID. Protocol for quality control in metabolic
profiling of biological fluids by U(H)PLC-MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed
Life Sci, 2016; 1008: 15–25.
17. Gutiu IA, Andries A, Mircioiu C, Radulescu F, Georgescu AM, Cioaca D.
Pharmacometabolomics, Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine. Rom J Intern
Med, 2010; 48(2): 187–91.
18. Balashova EE, Maslov DL, Lokhov PG. A Metabolomics Approach to Pharmacotherapy
Personalization. J Pers Med, 2018; 8(3): 28.
19. Phapale PB, Kim SD, Lee HW, Lim M, Kale DD, Kim YL, et al. An integrative approach
for identifying a metabolic phenotype predictive of individualized pharmacokinetics of
tacrolimus. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2010; 87: 426–36.
20. Rahmioglu N, Le Gall G, Heaton J, Kay KL, Smith NW, Colquhoun IJ, et al. Prediction
of variability in CYP3A4 induction using a combined 1H NMR metabonomics and
targeted UPLC-MS approach. J Proteome Res, 2011; 10: 2807–16.
21. Shin KH, Choi MH, Lim KS, Yu KS, Jang IJ, Cho JY. Evaluation of endogenous
metabolic markers of hepatic CYP3A activity using metabolic profiling and midazolam
clearance. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2013; 94: 601–09.
22. Diczfalusy U, Kanebratt KP, Bredberg E, Andersson TB, Bottiger Y, Bertilsson L. 4-
Hydroxycholesterol as an endogenous marker for CYP3A4/5 activity. Stability and half-
life of elimination after induction with rifampicin. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2009; 67: 38–43.
23. Griffin JL, Kauppinen RA. Tumour metabolomics in animal models of human cancer. J
Proteome Res, 2007; 6(2): 498–505.
24. Priyadarshini R, Raj GM, Shewade DG. Chromatography – The Essence of Bioanalysis.
Eur J Biomed Pharm Sci, 2016; 3(1); 366-77.
25. Grob RL, Barry EF. Modern Practice of Gas Chromatography. 4th ed., New Jersey; John
Wiley & Sons Inc: 2004.
26. Sliepcevich A, Gelosa D. Gas and liquid chromatography. In: Sergio Carra, editor.
Fundamentals of Chemistry. Italy: Unescoeolls;2009.
27. Chromatography-Modern Chemical techniques. London: The Royal Society of
Chemistry, Unilever., 116-59.
28. Pickford R. Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomic Analysis. Encyclopedia of
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 2019; 2: 410-25.
29. Van der Greef J, Smilde AK. Symbiosis of chemometrics and metabolomics: past,
present, and future. J Chemomet, 2005; 19: 376–86.
30. Brown SC, Kruppa G, Dasseux JL. Metabolomics applications of FT-ICR mass
spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev, 2005; 24(2): 223–31.
31. Granger JH, Bake A, Plumb RS, Perez JC, Wilson ID. Ultra performance liquid
chromatography MS(TOF): New separations technology for high throughput
metabonomics. Drug Met Rev, 2004; 36: 252.
32. Villas-Boas SG, Mas S, Akesson M, Smedsgaard J, Nielsen J. Mass spectrometry in
metabolome analysis. Mass Spectrom Rev, 2005; 24: 613–46.
33. Wilson ID, Plumb RS, Granger J, Major H, Williams R, Lenz EA. HPLC-MS-based
methods for the study of metabonomics. J Chromatog B, 2005; 817: 67–76.
34. Mohler RE, Dombek KM, Hoggard JC, Young ET, Synovec RE. Comprehensive two-
dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis of metabolites
in fermenting and respiring yeast cells. Anal Chem, 2006; 78: 2700–09.
35. Gika HG, Wilson ID, Theodoridis GA. Omics | Metabolomics: an Analytical Perspective.
Encyclopedia of Analytical Science (Third Edition) 2019; 82: 9.
36. Gika HG, Theodoridis GA, Plumb RS, Wilson ID. Current practice of liquid
chromatography-mass spectrometry in metabolomics and metabonomics. J Pharm
Biomed Anal, 2014; 87: 12-25.
37. Liu DQ, Hop CE. Strategies for characterization of drug metabolites using liquid
chromatography—Tandem mass spectrometry in conjunction with chemical
derivatization and on-line H/D exchangeapproaches. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2005; 37:
1–18.
38. Chen C, Gonzalez FJ, Idle JR. LC–MS-based metabolomics in drug metabolism. Drug
Metab Rev, 2007; 39: 581–97.
39. Kristal BS, Shurubor YI, Kaddurah-Daouk R, Matson WR. High-performance liquid
chromatography separations coupled with coulometric electrode array detectors: A unique
approach to metabolomics. Methods Mol Biol, 2007; 358: 159–74.
40. Beal MF, Matson WR, Swartz KJ, Gamache PH, Bird ED. Kynurenine pathway
measurements in Huntington‘s disease striatum: Evidence for reduced formation of
kynurenic acid. J Neurochem, 1990; 55: 1327–39.
41. Ogawa T, Matson WR, Beal MF, Myers RH, Bird ED, Milbury P, Saso S. Kynurenine
pathway abnormalities in Parkinson‘s disease. Neurology, 1992; 42: 1702-06.
42. German JB, Gillies LA, Smilowitz JT, Zivkovic AM, Watkins SM. Lipidomics and lipid
profiling in metabolomics. Curr Opin Lipidol, 2007; 18: 66–71.
43. Dunn WB, Broadhurst DI, Atherton HJ, Goodacre R, Griffin JL. Systems level studies of
mammalian metabolomes: The roles of mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic
resonance spectroscopy. Chem Soc Rev, 2011; 40: 387–426.
44. Psychogios N, Hau DD, Peng J, Guo AC, Mandal R, Bouatra S, et al. The human serum
metabolome. PLoS One, 2011; 6: e16957.
45. Sandusky P, Raftery D. Use of selective TOCSY NMR experiments for quantifying
minor components in complex mixtures: Application to the metabonomics of amino acids
in honey. Anal Chem, 2005; 77: 2455–63.
46. Nagana Gowda GA, Zhang S, Gu H, Asiago V, Shanaiah N, Raftery D. Metabolomics-
Based Methods for Early Disease Diagnostics: A Review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2008;
8(5): 617–33.
47. Viant MR. Improved methods for the acquisition and interpretation of NMR metabolomic
data. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2003; 310(3): 943–48.
48. Barker M, Rayens W. Partial least squares for discrimination. J Chemom, 2003; 17:
166–73.
49. Beckwith-Hall BM, Brindle JT, Barton RH, et al. Application of orthogonal signal
correction to minimise the effects of physical and biological variation in high resolution
1H NMR spectra of biofluids. Analyst, 2002; 127: 1283–88.
50. Nicholson JK, Lindon JC. Systems biology: Metabonomics. Nature, 2008; 455: 1054-6.
51. Bu Q, Huang Y.N, Yan G.Y, Cen X.B, Zhao Y.L. Comb. Chem. High Throughput
Screen, 2012; 15: 266.
52. Spratlin JL, Serkova NJ, Eckhardt SG. Clinical applications of metabolomics in
oncology: a review. Clin Cancer Res, 2009; 15: 431-40.
53. Lokhov PG, Dashtiev MI, Moshkovskii SI, Archakov AI. Metabolite profiling of blood
plasma of patients with prostate cancer. Metabolomics, 2010; 6: 156–63.
54. Lokhov PG, Trifonova OP, Maslov DL, Archakov AI. Blood plasma metabolites and the
risk ofdeveloping lung cancer in Russia. Eur J Cancer Prev, 2013; 22: 335–41.
55. Wishart DS, Tzur D, Knox C, et al. HMDB: the Human Metabolome Database. Nucleic
Acids Res, 2007; 35: D521–26.
56. Clayton TA, Baker D, Lindon JC, Everett JR, Nicholson JK. Pharmacometabonomic
identification of a significant host-microbiome metabolic interaction affecting human
drug metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009; 106: 14728–33.
57. Bingbing Li, Xuyun He, Wei Jia and Houkai Li. Novel Applications of Metabolomics in
Personalized Medicine: A Mini-Review. Molecules, 2017; 22: 1-10.
58. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of
hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet, 2005; 365: 217–23.
59. Thoenes M, Neuberger HR, Volpe M, Khan BV, Kirch W, Böhm M. Antihypertensive
drug therapy and blood pressure control in men and women: An international perspective.
J Hum Hypertens, 2010; 24: 336-44.
60. Rotroff DM, Shahin MH, Gurley SB, Zhu H, Motsinger-Reif A, Meisner M, Beitelshees
AL, Fiehn O, Johnson JA, Elbadawi-Sidhu M, etal. Pharmacometabolomic assessments
of atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide treatment reveal novel drug response phenotypes.
CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol, 2015; 4: 669–79.
61. Wikoff WR, Frye RF, Zhu H, Gong Y, Boyle S, Churchill E, et al.
Pharmacometabolomics reveals racial differences in response to atenolol treatment. PLoS
One, 2013; 8: e57639.