Barrer R.M. Diffusion in and Through Solids (CUP, 1951) (T) (474s)
Barrer R.M. Diffusion in and Through Solids (CUP, 1951) (T) (474s)
IN AND THROUGH
SOLIDS
BY
RICHARD M. BARRER
D.Sc, Sc.D.? Ph.D., F.R.I.C.
Professor of Chemistry, Aberdeen University; formerly
Research Fellow, Clare College, Cambridge
CAMBRIDGE
AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS
1951
PUBLISHED BY
THE SYNDICS OF THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
London Office: Bentley House, N.W.I
American Branch: New York
Agents foir Gana54t,?IhdiaV^tid:Paki§tan5 M«*clhf]lan
FirpLprinted 1041
Al'Witfi, cortectians , MET
PAGE
CHAPTER III. GAS FLOW IN AND THROUGH
C R Y S T A L S AND G L A S S E S 91
Introduction 144
The Solubility of Gases in Metals 145
The Solubility of Gases in Alloys 158
The Measurement of Permeation Velocities 161
The Influence of Temperature upon Permeability 162
The Influence of Pressure on the Permeability of
Metals to Gases 169
Permeation Velocities at High Pressures 175
Some Mechanisms for the Process of Flow 178
The Behaviour of Hydrogen Isotopes in Diffusion and
Solution in Metals 183
The Influence of Phase Changes upon Permeability 191
The Influence of Pre-Treatment upon Permeability 192
Grain-Boundary and Lattice Permeation 197
Flow of Nascent Hydrogen through Metals 200
Introduction 207
Measurement of Diffusion Constants in Metals 208
A Comparison of Methods of Measuring Diffusion
Constants 219
The Diffusion Constants of Various Elements in Metals 221
CONTENTS Vll
PAGE
Degassing of Metals 226
Diffusion and Absorption of Gases in finely divided
Metals 230
The Influence of Impurity upon Diffusion Constants 234
CHAPTER VI. D I F F U S I O N OF I O N S IN I O N I C
CRYSTALS, AND THE I N T E R D I F F U S I O N OF
METALS 239
Introduction and Experimental 239
Types of Diffusion Gradient 245
The Structure of Real Crystals 247
Some Equilibrium Types of Disorder in Crystals 248
The Influence of Gas Pressure upon Conductivity 251
The Energy of Disorder in Crystals 254
The Influence of Temperature on Diffusion in Metals
and Conductivity in Salts 257
The Identity of the Current-carrying Ions 265
The Relation between Conductivity and Diffusion
Constants 268
Diffusion Constants in Metals and Ionic Lattices 272
Diffusion Anisotropy 276
The Influence of Concentration upon Diffusion Con-
stants in Alloys 279
Summary of Factors influencing Diffusion Constants 283
Models for Conductivity and Diffusion Processes in
Crystals 291
CHAPTERVII. S T R U C T U R E - S E N S I T I V E D I F F U S I O N 311
Types of irreversible Fault in real Crystals 311
Non-equilibrium Disorder in Crystals 313
Structure-sensitive Conductivity Processes 321
Structure-sensitive Diffusion Processes 327
CHAPTER VIII. M I G R A T I O N IN T H E S U R F A C E
L A Y E R OF S O L I D S 337
Introduction 337
Vlli CONTENTS
PAGE
Evidence of Mobility from Growth and Dissolution of
Crystals 337
Evidence of Mobility from the Condensation and
Aggregation of Metal Films 339
Measurements of Surface Migration in some Stable
Films 347
The Migration of other Film-forming Substances 368
A Comparison of the Data 370
The Variation of the Diffusion Constants with Surface
Concentration 371
Phase changes in Stable Monolayers 374
Calculation of the Surface Diffusion Constant 375
Applications of Surface Mobility in Physico-Chemical
Theory 377
CHAPTER IX. P E R M E A T I O N , S O L U T I O N AND D I F -
F U S I O N OF G A S E S I N O R G A N I C S O L I D S 382
Permeability Spectrum 382
Structures of Membrane-forming Substances 385
Permeability Constants of Groups A and B of Fig. 132 391
The Air Permeability of Group C of Fig. 132 406
The Solution and Diffusion of Gases in Elastic Polymers 411
Models for Diffusion in Rubber 422
CHAPTER X. P E R M E A T I O N OF V A P O U R S THROUGH,
AND D I F F U S I O N IN, O R G A N I C J S O L I D S 430
Water-Organic Membrane Diffusion Systems 430
The Permeability Constants to Water of Various
Membranes 438
Sorption Kinetics in Organic Solids 443
A Modified Diffusion Law for Sorption of Water by
Rubbers 445
The Passage of Vapours other than Water through
Membranes 447
Remarks on the Permeation and Diffusion Processes 448
AUTHOR INDEX 454
SUBJECT INDEX 460
F O R E W O R D
The general theory of diffusion is based upon analogy to the
flow of heat through solid media, as is exemplified in the
classical treatments of Fourier and also of Lord Kelvin in the
Encyclopedia. In the actual process of diffusion of molecules
and ions through and in solids a whole set of new phenomena
is observed. For example, limitations on the magnitude of
the diffusion potential are much more frequently imposed on
these material systems by such factors as solubility or com-
pound formation than are observed in systems in which the
flow of heat alone is concerned. Again the flow of matter
through solids is frequently composite in character, the
various modes of transport being dependent on micro-
heterogeneity, as is exemplified by lattice diffusion and move-
ment along crystal boundaries, canals and capillaries, or even
on molecular discontinuity as is the case when migration
depends on the existence of molecular or ionic "holes" or
vacant lattice points in a crystal. In studying the movement
of material particles through a solid, we must consider the
nature of the interaction between diffusing material and
diffusion medium. We may in a somewhat general manner
note that either only dispersive or Van der Waals interactions
are involved, or that electronic switches have taken place
leading to chemi-sorption or chemical combination. Migra-
tion across a surface or through a solid medium may thus
involve movement across an energy barrier from one position
of minimum potential energy to another. At sufficiently high
temperatures in the higher energy levels activated surface
migration naturally merges into free migration, with a con-
sequent change in the temperature dependence of the
diffusion.
The mechanism of the transfer of material across phase
boundaries likewise presents a number of novel and interesting
problems. Here we have to consider firstly the abnormal
x FOREWORD
distribution of diffusing material at the phase boundary. We
note that the Donnan membrane equilibrium may apply to
electrolytic systems diffusing through a solid membrane, the
Gibbs relation for a non-electrolyte or the adsorption iso-
therm for a gas permeating a solid. Diffusion must then take
place into and out of the boundary layer from the homo-
geneous phases on both sides. Energies of activation are
involved which may differ considerably from those required
for the diffusion process in the homogeneous phases. Dr Barrer
has been interested in these problems for a number of years,
from the theoretical as well as from the experimental point of
view. I pointed out to him that they were the concern of
many who would find a monograph on the subject invaluable
in their work, and I experienced a deep sense of satisfaction
when my colleague assented to the suggestion of writing a
book.
E. K. RIDEAL
12 February 1941
A U T H O R ' S P R E F A C E
Diffusion processes are related to chemical kinetics on the one
hand, and to sorption and solution equilibria on the other.
There are available excellent surveys dealing with chemical
kinetics and also with sorption equilibria. No previous
text has attempted to correlate and summarise diffusion data
in condensed phases, save briefly, and in relation to one or other
of these fields. It is apparent that the study of diffusion touches
upon numerous aspects of physico-chemical research. There
are in general two states of flow by diffusion—the so-called
stationary and non-stationary states. From the former one
derives the permeability constant (quantity transferred/unit
time/unit area of unit thickness under a standard concen-
tration or pressure difference) and from the latter the diffusion
constant. The permeability constant, P, and the diffusion
constant, D, are related by
March 1941
CHAPTER I
SOLUTIONS OF T H E D I F F U S I O N EQUATION
DIFFERENTIAL FORMS OF FICK'S LAWS
No adequate compilation of those solutions of the diffusion
equation applicable to the diffusion of matter has as yet been
made. The author has become aware of the difficulty of
obtaining suitable solutions in a number of studies of diffusion,
and it is hoped that this chapter will provide a source of
reference for such solutions. Equations of chemical kinetics
can be used readily in differential or integral form, but the
equations of diffusion kinetics require for their treatment a
special and often laborious technique. Many of the cases which
can arise have not yet been solved rigorously, though the field
is a rich one both from the mathematical and the experimental
viewpoints. The present chapter aims at giving some solutions
of the diffusion equation in a form in which they may be applied,
together with cases of diffusion systems in which the boundary
conditions are those of the diffusion equation solved.
Two familiar differential forms of Fick's laws of diffusion
are: ^fi
dC
and Tt
Equation (1) gives the rate of permeation, in the steady state
of flow, through unit area of any medium, in terms of the
concentration gradient across the medium, and a constant
called the diffusion constant D. The second equation refers to
the accumulation of matter at a given point in a medium as
a function of time. That is, it refers to a non-stationary state
of flow. This second equation may be derived from the first,
by considering diffusion in the -f x direction of a cylinder of
unit cross-section. The accumulation of matter within an
element of volume dx bounded by two planes, I and 2, normal
2 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
+D
dx dx
which gives T t W
In two dimensions the above equation becomes
dC
^ ^ ^ , (3)
dt dx2 dy2
and in three dimensions
dC ^d2C ^d2C ^d*C
dt dx2 dy2 dz2
or ~ = DV2C (5)
dt
or ^ = D(divgrad)O, (6)
D
x
dt~ dx
and then make the substitution
dt -V\W W Wl'
This transformation involves then a change of co-ordinates,
after which methods suitable for the solution of (4) apply
also to (8).
In many cases the diffusion constant, D, depends itself upon
the concentration in the medium, e.g. the interdiffusion of
SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION 3
metals (Chap. VI), the diffusion of water in certain zeolites
(Chap. Ill), the surface diffusion of caesium, sodium, potassium,
or thorium on tungsten (Chap. VIII), or the diffusion of organic
vapours in media such as rubber which swell during the
permeation process (Chap. X). It is now necessary to solve
an equation of the form
dC_ i
y = rsin#, j
so that the equation becomes
dC
\+d (ldC)+d (rdG
C2)^y (25)
rt
and the quantity diffused in time t, Q — geft? ie
Jo
~t. (26)
rt*) = ; , _
(32)
' +1
h(k) = - f + °°/(a;') sin (*'&)<&:'.
7TJ - o o '
Thus when the equations (32) are substituted in (31) one has
as a general solution
7T J 0 J —oo
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ^ 9 10
-10 -9 -3 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
The second term is the Gaussian error function, erf (y), and
may be evaluated from mathematical tables. Equation (37)
may be expanded as a series:
(38)
7.
The solution for x < 0 is correspondingly
=
~2
a:5
__^ ?+ n (39)
10 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
Z2 ^ ^ 7" 0 ^
Fig. 2. Diffusion in two phases I and II where k = 3 and D1 = /) 2 .
\f5F-0
-5 -) 0 / " 2
Fig. 3. Dift'usion in two phasrs I and 11 where k — J and Dl = D2.
THE NON-STATIONARY STATE OF FLOW 11
(ii) Cx = Co for t = 0 and x < 0; C2 = 0 for t = 0 and x > 0.
-J -2 -1 o • 1 z—~*
Fig. 4. Diffusion in I and II where k = 1 and X^ = 4Z>,.
Fig. 5. Diffusion in two phases I and II where k — 3, Dx — 4D2, and for the curves
jD2t) = 1, V W ) = 2» w n i l e for t h e
curves (b) <J(D2t) = 0-5, V(A0 = !•
12 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
t ic I'D I 2 Cxl2y/{Dt)
2
or —
— a*
where y =-
(52)
If instead of the membrane being initially free of gas there is
an initial uniform concentration, Co, of gas in the membrane,
the solution is
. (53)
TT m r 0 (2rn+l) Z
Again, if C^ = 0 for all t, and O0 = 0 at t = 0, the solution is
C = -— S s m - ^ e x p -=— sin — dx
l
l I I L J J o *<
4C0 °° 1 . (2m+l)7rx f D(2m+l)27T2tl
y V^ _ oifi ^ 1 own I 2 I
-Vw?o(2m+T)8in I eXP
L I2 I
(57)
At the midpoint of the membrane (x = |Z) equation (57)
reduces to
Should the gas desorb from the slab not into a vacuum, as in
(58), but into a gas atmosphere where at x = 0 and x — I the
concentration is Cx, the solution of (58) becomes
C - ^ + (60-^)- ^ _ ^ _ - _ e X p ^ ? J.
(59)
THE NON-STATIONARY STATE OF FLOW 17
1== [lC{x,t)dx
Jo
(2m+l)nx [~ D(2m +
I eXp
L T*
(60)
When the integration is carried out one gets
(63)
n°-»£o (2m + 1)2 M P jj'
18 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
. (64)
J)- (66)
THE NON-STATIONARY STATE OF FLOW 19
Equation (53) as £->oo approaches the line
C9 = ffWt-Ci)t, (68)
so that the intercept, L, on the time axis is given by
L i rq*1, w ojn
(C2-C1)l6D+'3D~^Dj' (69)
^ =~ . (696)
In equations (69), (69a) and (696), one is provided with an
easy means of measuring D.
^ ^
x
Jo exp L— ^—-J#(*)*,
and Q, the amount sorbed in unit area at time t, is
Q=\ C(x,t)dx
Jo
LrSwaai*. (72)
^ m=0j0
If in the interval t' = Ototit is possible to represent <p(t') by
c
The constants pi and Bt are obtained in terms of D by means
of the equations (77)-(81). The /?/s are found from the positive
roots of the transcendental equation
tanz + Az = O, (77)
which are easily obtained graphically by plotting the curves
y = — Az and y = tanz. The solutions are the points of inter-
section of the curves.
One may now evaluate the constants Bi} fiv In equation (74)
B>
- <80)
and the equations
B'o = -0-099A + 0-644 -.
B[ = -0-146A + 0-894-ei,
B'2 = - 0-157A + 0-946 - e 2 ,
(81)
£3 = - 0-159A + 0-958 - e 3 ,
and for all B't where i > 3
B\ = -0-162A + 0-972-e 3 .,
The quantities et are then read from Fig. 6 for all values of
A between 0 and 5. Then in the final expression D disappears
from the ratio EBJfi^
One now sees that it is easily possible to evaluate D, the
diffusion constant, from desorption experiments at constant
volume, provided 1 < A < 5, and that no rate controlling inter-
face reaction intervenes. The advantage of this method over
the method outlined in equations (72)-(72a) is that one does
24 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
03
I
f i
w s sVs
Wf
uFA
01 # s,
1I 1 1
i "7 /
1 \mj \
11 m/
F L
s
\m s
ooKrJ#1J 3
Fig. 6.
(83)
Si
where C^ denotes the uniform final concentration in the
solution or gas phases. When the distribution coefficient
between membrane and solution is unity,
U Si
26 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
/I
(86)
and
(87)
)'
>t 1 2
1
1 1
1
0-8
0-6 -
\
\
0-4
Fig. 7. A typical diffusion rate curve of log (gC - C*>) against time.
The units of ordinates and abcissae are arbitrary.
(90a)
(91a)
28 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
(12)
(98)
Equation (98) for the case when C2 = C^ reduces to
1 ^ - ^ - ) j . (99)
i±?^\)
« i ocnJo(ana)
(104)
where an is the nth root of the equation J0(<xna) = 0. The first
four roots of Jo(ocna) = 0 are
2-405 5-520 8-654 11-7915 , ^
«i = - — , oc2 = -—, a 3 = - — , a4 = — . (105)
II Hi U> U/
(106)
C = — .2 -iTtrCdr^-A CCrdr
TO Jo a2 Jo
(107)
and Q = 2n I Crdr, per unit length.
(108)
i)(8-654)2q \
x exp{ — j (8-654) exp
2 - a* ) — • ; •
(108a)
* References to suitable tables are given at the end of this Chapter.
BD 3
34 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
(110)
2- , J/ttr)M«nr)dr
THE NON-STATIONARY STATE OF FLOW 35
lff(r) = Co for a < r < 0 and at t = 0 (which would correspond
to the sorption equilibrium of a gas in a wire before admitting
another dose of gas at constant concentration C^), equation
(111) reduces to
where the values of a1? a2, a 3 and a4 are given by (105), and
permit four exponential terms of the series to be used.
Case 4. If the surface concentration of solute is C = At,
where A is a constant, and there is an initial solute concen-
tration Co in the cylinder of radius a at t = 0, the general
solution is(96)
Z>L* V a?ot%Jo(ana)
)
and so one finds for Q and C the expression
=C1=
(115)
5. If one has a hollow cylinder of external and internal
radii 6 and a respectively, the initial concentration in the
cylinder is f(r) for a<r<b9 and the concentrations at the
surfaces at r = b and r = a are zero for all time t, the general
solution for the concentration as a function of time(io) is
)P
Jo
(116)
3-2
36 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
\anr)
L
From this equation by means of the relation
Q = n{b2 - a2) Co - 2/r C Crdr
Ja
one may find Q, the amount of material which has diffused
out of unit length of the walls of the cylindrical tube, as a
function of time,
(118)
The roots of the equation U0(anb) — 0 = U0(ana) are com-
puted from the expression (ii)
nn (p-1) riOOQi)»-l) 1 l(p-l)3
n + +
* (p-1) 8p(nn) ]
55! )
r 32(1073)(p - +
3 ( ) ( p 5 0 ( ^ - 1 )
L
L 5(8p)Hp-
* This integration makes use of the relationships
Ul{anr)=-l!p&,
1V n
' o(anr)
rdU0(ccnrn _^J}
L dr Jr=b n'
a/* Jr=a
the first of which will be found in Watson <ioa) and the others in Carslaw(io).
THE NON-STATIONARY STATE OF FLOW 37
where p — b/a. The values of Jo(ocnb) and J0(<xna) may then
be found from tables of Bessel functions.
Case 6. If one has a hollow cylinder of internal and external
radii a and b respectively, and there is a concentration C1 at
r = a and C2 at r = b, and a concentration Co in the wall of
.the cylinder, one may treat equation (116) in the same way
as was done in equations (63)-(696) to find the rate of approach
to the steady state of flow through the wall of the cylinder.
The intercept L made on the time axis by the asymptote to
the curve of the quantity diffused plotted against the time is
now given by
n*a log a/6 » Jl(ocna)
L
~ 2D(C^Q f Jl(anb)- Jl(ana)^o^]r=a, (119)
if
rb r tin .
= rUo(ocnr) C 0 - p -
Ja LI loga-logft
when Co — 0, Cx = 0 the most important experimental case
arises, and the equation above reduces to *
2 ° ^ J0(ccna)J0(ocnb) b
u = r/(r) at t = 0. (/)
The problem is analogous to the process of cooling of a sphere
with radiation at its surface (12), the radiation corresponding to
the surface desorption. Proceeding therefore along analogous
lines to those adopted in the problem of the cooling of the
earth (13), one obtains
i; r'f(r')smanr'dr' I s i n a / e - ^ ^ ,
(121)
where a f t is t h e nth r o o t of
oca
tan aa =
I-ah'
THE NON-STATIONARY STATE OF FLOW 39
When/(r) = Co the equation reduces to
A - A (123)
v
_ 1575A3+1575A2 + 483A + 45
(i) _
dt
(ii)
(iii) - —- + he = 0 at x = I, where h = k/D,
dx
(iv) C =f(x) = 0.
hi
Bl
s m mt m ms
=
20
1-9
\
% N Ml
if
b m • S
v Mi
= !B m m,
• K S
= =
9
H Si ^,
^
1-6 JS
s • • m. m Is SI ••
S
s 9 IB mm H s
«E 91
m
m
5
Fig. 8. This figure gives the first four roots, z0, zv z2, zz, of the equation
tanz+Az=0, for values of A ranging from 1 to 5. For the curve z0 the
vertical scale reads as shown. For zl9 the values read from the curve should
be increased by 3: for z2, add 6: for z3, add 9.
A_B
(1246)
CL h'
THE NON-STATIONARY STATE OF FLOW 41
The roots of the first expression are the points of intersection
of the curves y = ^ and y = \ - \ .
The second curve is a hyperbola; the roots of the equation
(124 a) are all real, not repeated, and only positive values are
to be taken.
The solution of the problem is
n - 2 y
/(^(a^ (125)
Jo
which, if f{x') = Co, reads
n cos * n
a
J
and gives for Q, the quantity desorbed per unit area,
A •—
(129)
(130)
One may work out the different simple types of behaviour
that may be encountered. In the equations (129) and (130) vs
denotes the saturation concentration at the surface, and u8
the saturation concentration in the metal. It was observed
that very great concentration discontinuities may occur at
THE NON-STATIONARY STATE OF FLOW 43
the interfaces when diffusion is rapid compared with rates of
transport from the surface to the interior of the plate and
vice versa.
0
V;
^
1
\7?/A 77
j>o x-l. x*o x-lDistance x'° &1
Fig. 9.
w _
surface of a solid, and left to diffuse into it, or over its surface.
Important examples of these diffusion systems are:
(i) Diffusion of caesium along tungsten filaments (15).
(ii) Diffusion of thorium around a tungsten strip (16).
(iii) Diffusions of sodium and potassium into, and over,
tungsten strip(17,18).
It will be seen from the above examples, and in Chap. VIII,
that most of our quantitative data on surface diffusions are
based on treatments of Fick's law for instantaneous sources.
The solution for an instantaneous plane source in an infinite
solid may be derived from equation (34), in which is given
the general solution
!
D [ > ' <34)
4. +U .. W _3C
to the equation —- = X> -—-
ot ox*
for the boundary conditions
C = f(x) when t = 0,
C = f(x} t) when t > 0.
Suppose in the infinite solid of equation (34) there exists
initially a concentration C — Co between the planes x = — \h
and x = + \h. Equation (34) becomes for the new conditions
(135)
&
obtained by putting x = 0 in (134). Equation (135) gives a
very simple method of obtaining Z>.
-10 - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
«- from
Distance Boundary
Fig. 10. Diffusion from a thin layer into a solvent.
C =
Q Q
4arDt exp - 4Dt
if r denotes the radial distance in the plane from the point
source.
46 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
<138>
I t will be noted that in the 2- and 3-dimensional cases the
value of C a t r or R = 0 is
and (140)
^-idb'
respectively. Equation (139) should have ready application
in evaluating D in the case of surface diffusion. For
instance, one might by a molecular ray method deposit a
metal film on a crystal at a point, and heat the crystal. The
spreading of the metal could be followed photoelectrically
(Chap. VIII).
Equations (138) and (140) are not yet of particular interest
in the case of the diffusion of matter, because the conditions
of the solution are not capable of easy experimental realisation.
One might also have an instantaneous spherical surface source,
for which the boundary conditions are that a thin layer of
matter exists in the shell
a<r<a+h
at a concentration C. Then
f(r+o)/2V(») r(r-a)l2V(Dt)
Lp i p
i ~w~JJ- (143)
The equations (141)-(143) are more significant in considering
flow of heat than of matter, and give the form of temperature
waves spreading from areas or volumes through an infinite
surrounding medium. Equation (142) would apply to the
diffusion of solute from a sphere of aqueous gel into a sur-
rounding medium of solute-free gel. It might also apply to
the diffusion of a metal solute from a sphere of a solvent metal
embedded in a mass of the solute metal.
(144)
of which pass through the origin. Matano (20) showed that this
was true of data obtained on the metal pair Ni-Cu.
One can also obtain a solution of the problem with the
following boundary conditions:
(i) C = 0 at x = 0 for all t,
(ii) C = O0 at 0<#<oo and at t = 0.
If one writes C = dC/dX in equation (144), it may be re-
written in the form
so that In (DC) = - fA ^ + In a
Jo m
r "AAdAn (150)
or DC ••
Further integration gives
for which the boundary conditions (i) and (ii) above give
6 = 0 (from (i)) and
C
a =
T (152)
Equations such as (151) and (153) are not of the same practical
importance as are (147) or (148).
50 SOLUTIONS OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION
and so the slope, and the intercept on the axis of log Q, gives
fx(A) and F±(b). The theory then gives D, and all the other
terms. This procedure is available for all converging series of
exponentials.
Special methods are available in other instances such as
the graphical integration method applied to equation (148).
Solutions involving semi-infinite or infinite solids all give
and so one can use the relationship between x and t for a fixed
value of C, to measure D. Other methods, or examples of the
application of these methods, will be indicated at various
points throughout the text (e.g. pp. 97 and 352 et seq).
TYPES OF FLOW
(1)
Such a flow is independent of the length of the tube, which
Knudsen(2) showed was contrary to experiment. Knudsen
therefore supposed that of each N molecules striking the wall
a fraction / was emitted with random velocity distribution,
and a fraction (1 —/) was specularly reflected. Some molecules
are then returned in the direction from which they came, and
more return the greater the length of the tube. The number
of molecules striking unit area in unit time at the inlet and
outlet sides of the tube are respectively \NQCyW and lN0C2w.
The excess flow of molecules from the inlet to the outlet along
the axis x can be shown to be \B(dNjdx){§), in the stationary
state of flow, when B is a constant depending upon the shape
TYPES OF FLOW 55
of the tube. N is a linear function of x, in the stationary state,
and the nett rate of flow in mol./sec. is given by
_ B __ ( . (2)
but is higher, and follows a different law for rough tubes. For
some tubes /? may be taken as independent of [R],
There is a formal connection between stream-line and
viscous-flow formulae which may be brought out as follows.
An alternative form of the above equation of flow is
1 ^ (15)
£=rf>. (17)
In the general case of isothermal high-pressure flow, whatever
the Reynold's number, we may thus say
(vp)»<x:(pl-Pl), (18)
and the value of n then determines whether stream-line or
turbulent flow is occurring. Never under any conditions have
values of n been found such that 2 < n< 1. Later in this chapter
will be given examples of gas flow in porous solids which are
partially turbulent (p. 73). The great importance of gas flow
or vapour flow in turbine design or in aeronautics can easily
be understood, and farther information on turbulent flow will
be found in references given earlier(14,15,16,17). Equations for
an adiabatic turbulent flow have been given by Stodola(is).
j = APL(Pl-p2), (27)
(29)
CONSTANTS, UNITS AND DIMENSIONS 61
an(
= PG^(^1+^2)> ihLasbeencalledbyManegold(i8,i9)
the "molecular permeability". By analogy with the previous
cases {PQIJPL^ o n e n a s a ^ s o a "molecular permeability
coefficient" Pj^l; and finally a "specific molecular per-
meability" PMlyl(M/RT), which is dependent only upon
pore size and type. The equation of molecular effusion through
an orifice gives a "molecular effusion coefficient" PM, and the
equation of orifice flow an " adiabatic effusion coefficient" PA.
These relationships may be summarised as in Table 1.
The various constants defined above have, it will be seen,
different dimensions. It is important therefore to specify
accurately what constants are being employed. When, as is
usually done, the permeability constant is formally defined
as the number of unit volumes passing in unit time through
unit cube having unit pressure difference between its faces,
its dimensions are cm.3sec.1 g."1, which are those of the
"permeability coefficient" of Table 1, for Poiseuille flow. The
dimensions of the diffusion constant D defined by Fick's law
dC 32C
-— = D^r-z are cm.2 sec."1, which are those of the molecular
dl dx2
permeability coefficient of Table 1.
The numerical measure of the permeability constant is
dependent upon the units in which it is expressed. The
literature shows a lack of uniformity with respect to units.
It is specially important to state the thickness of the membrane
used. In some systems it may also be an advantage to give
other membrane properties such as porosity, defined by the
ratio
Pore volume
Total volume *
Dimensions
Equation of flow Perraeabilit}7 constants Properties in O.G.S. units
0 = (30)
(33)
FLOW OF GASES THROUGH POROUS PLATES 67
When one has two capillaries of radii rx and r2 in series,
IT Aripo-p2
1 + 1-—j~ A,-
where px and p2 are the pressures at the inlet and outlet sides
of the capillary, and p0 the pressure a t the junction of its two
halves of radii rx and r2.
The last equation takes the form
(36)
<37)
^
where A2 again proves to be less than 1 % of K". One obtains
therefore as the final constant K" for m capillaries in series
(39)
Fig. 13 gives the quantities of gas flowing through a porous
plate (expressed as c.c. x atm.) as a function of pressure for
3-8
68 MOLECULAR FLOW IN CAPILLARY SYSTEMS
(HO
0-08
| 0-06
0-04
0-02
OB l'C 1-5
Ptktm.
Fig. 13. Gas flow through a porous plate, where K is defined by equation (39).
E = n-j\ F = nj (I = thickness).
PERMEABILITY OF REFRACTORIES
/J / /
/
/
/
/
A 'A 30UCT i
»UCT M / y
/
f 0 /
/
v/
/
/
Reciprocal of thickness
Fig. 14. Gas flow through refractories as a function of thickness.
1 • 2-1 • 5 times the apparent path; while Chilton and Colbourn (36)
claimed that 80% of resistance to flow should be due to
alternate contractions and expansions of the cross-section,
and only 20 % due to the viscosity. However, equations
having the form of Poiseuille's law must and do apply, and
one has as examples Adzumi's data for flow at moderately
small pressures through porous plates (p. 66), and the data
cited in the previous pages (69-73) for the permeability of
refractories. In papers dealing with the permeabilities of un-
consolidated and consolidated sands it has become customary
to plot the logarithm of the so-called "friction factor", / ,
against the logarithm of Reynold's number [R] = dWpj4trj(\.Q.).
The curve is rectilinear at low pressures, but undergoes a
smooth continuous transition to another rectilinear portion of
smaller slope at the onset of turbulent flow (37,38) (Fig. 15, p. 75).
The friction factor is usually defined by Fanning's (39) equation
for a capillary
7 , , ,
f_gdPl
J _gdPl-p2 l \
L (
~ \W*r
where g = the acceleration due to gravity, d = the diameter
'
of a capillary, p = the density of the gas at the temperature
of the experiment, and the mean pressure J(Pi+p 2 ) °^ fl°w>
W = the velocity of flow in c.c./sec. Fanning's equation is
derivable from an equation of turbulent flow
\-Pl), (41)
. PkVVrT
PER SEC 5
6
ROBINSON
CERAMIC B
2O-3
37-8
s | SYMBC )LS
7 WOOOeiNE
WILCOX
19-7
ii
> =4=t 6 15-9
m z°£ "Aas 9
O
3RD VENANGO
ROBINSON
11-9
19-5
W OIL uo J ROBINSON 18-4
wr.ci_c
—_J. Ui.BUf
OF M
2
3
3ROVENANGO
WILCOX
22-3
16-3
1 WARREN
" t 4 192
\ l! •f
5
6
3R0 VENANGO
ROBINSON
21-4
206
7 CERAMIC C 332
[i 8 3RDVENANGO 21-9
—:?: ^
1-0 xlO 7 1 9 WOODBINE 238
zz:
=
-Hi ?O 26-9
—
-f ?1 27-7
^jo 2 221
7
"Clj I i 3 28-8
V i-i-' I 2*
25
FLINT
OTTA WA
38-5
30 9
l*-
\
}
\ #
N 11 , 1 !i j
4—•-> 4 T =
26
27
Z0-3C OTTAWA
SHOT
34 •5
•?
!
+u |
j
— ill
ill' L 1
1-0.1C5
•v.
T*l
fiti
UNCONSOLIOATtp^ "*
5AMD
'. \ •Si
1O«1O4
!
^, ifNl
p—-1[— ... V
i L "^
sar \
1-CxlO3
10X102 %
h-H—«
1
1
t.
1
10 1
0-001 001 0-1 swp 10 100 100 1000
Fig. 15. The curves log (friction factor) versus log (Reynold's number) in the flow of
various simple fluids through porous materials.
76 M O L E C U L A R FLOW I N C A P I L L A R Y SYSTEMS
(46)
sW*»--ar'
where v(x) denotes the convection velocity as a function of x,
SEPARATION OF GAS MIXTURES AND ISOTOPES 81
and T the temperature. For a separating unit of length I
there is a characteristic time
B"
Fig. 17. Mercury diffusion pumps. " A " is the Hertz pump and " B " is a unit
with a modified mercury jet. The pumps are connected in series as shown.
(Scherr (54).)
apparatus this would be 1000 days for liquids, and < 1 day
for gases. The equilibrium state is defined by the equation
G
^Cv^=°- (47)
82 MOLECULAR FLOW IN CAPILLARY SYSTEMS
It was found in a liquid mixture D20(32°/o) + H2O(68o/o) that
a separation of up to 4-8 % was established in two days—
about j 1 ^ of the equilibrium separation in the stationary state.
The method was employed successfully to disproportionate
the isotopes Zn64, Zn66, Zn68, as aqueous solutions of zinc sul-
phate (57). The isotopes were estimated spectroscopically. The
method has also been used (59) in the separation of isotopes
of Cl and of Hg. The method is of quite general applicability
in disproportionate or sedimenting such mixtures as
ZnCl2, ZnSO4 in H2O(57), w-Hexane in CC14(57),
NaCl, Na2SO4 in H2O(57), C6H6 in C6H5C1(57),
Chlorophyll in CC14(57).
Table 9 illustrates its efficiency in separating gas mixtures (55).
TABLE 9. The Clusius-Dickel method of separating
gas mixtures
Total pressure approximately 1 atm.
Length of Composition at
Original gas separating Temp,
mixture column diff. "Heavy" "Light"
% cm. °C. end end
25 Br2 75 He 65 -300 100% Br2 (liq.) 100% He
40CO 2 60 H 2 100 -600 100% CO2
20 O2 80 N 2 (air) (a) 100 -600 42% O2
(b) 290 -600 85% O2
Normal Ne 260 -600 At. wt. 20-68
(at. wt. =20-18)
23H 87 C1 77H 35 C1 290 -600 40% HS7C1
60% H35C1
( ^ ) } ] (49)
2 2
if a = L /n D.
When x = L
) i^
^1 2(e
~" a *"*"* +c ~ 9 " a) * (5o)
* In equations (48) to (58) C denotes the number of molecules per unit length
of the capillary, including those adsorbed on the wall. It is given by equation (55).
6-2
84 MOLECULAR FLOW IN CAPILLARY SYSTEMS
Thus in time t there flows into the second vessel a number of
molecules Nt given by
so that
4 ;
£ ^9V ' (51)
D— L 9 (52)
so that a=-
and T=
' -3"U) a -¥- (54)
(55)
(57)
STATES OF CAPILLARY GAS FLOW 85
in which
) ( ^ y P , (58)
That is, the diffusion rate tends for longer times to become
that for stationary streaming, as would be anticipated. The
function ft(t/oc) then approaches the asymptote ir(t/oc) = 1,
corresponding to stationary flow.
In Clausing's apparatus the flow through two capillaries
with diameters in the ratio 1:10 was measured. The pressure
on the ingoing side was virtually constant, and on the outgoing
side was measured by two ionisation gauges. The current,
which was then amplified, was proportional to the pressure,
and was registered by a linear galvanometer with a vibration
period of ^ sec. Thus the deflection was found as a function
of time, and so, from the calibration curve for the instruments,
the value of p and therefore of Nt = Pcc\Jr(tj(x) was deduced.
The record of the diffusion process was obtained photo-
graphically on a moving photographic plate. Employing the
foregoing theory to interpret his photographs, Clausing
obtained the lifetimes of molecules of argon, nitrogen, and
neon on glass. He also obtained the lifetime of argon, r e , as
a function of temperature, his results being expressible as
linear logr e versus I/I 7 curves (T in °K.) (Fig. 18). According
to the theory of Frenkel(60),
Te~ToeAHlRT, (59)
-S5
WO 1300
Fig. 18. The linear relationship between log re and l/T (T in ° K.). ®, cleaned
with chromic acid; • , A> cleaned with hydrofluoric acid.
REFERENCES
(1) Warburg, E. Ann. Phys., Lpz.9 159, 399 (1876).
(2) Knudsen,M. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 28, 75 (1909); 35, 389 (1911).
(3) Gaede, W. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 41, 289 (1913).
(4) v. Smoluchowski, M. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 33, 1559 (1910).
(5) Buckingham, E. Technol. Pap. U.S. Bur. Stand. No. 183 (1921).
(6) Klose, W. Phys. Z. 31, 503 (1930); Ann. Phys., Lpz., 11, 73
(1931).
(7) Clausing, P. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 1, 489, 569 (1930).
(8) Herzfeld, K. and Smallwood, M. In Taylor's Treatise on Physical
Chemistry, 1, 169 (1931).
(9) Treatise on Physical Chemistry, 1, 171 (1931).
(10) Brillouin, M. Lecons sur la Viscosite, Paris (1907).
(11) Hagenbach, E. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 109, 835 (I860).
(12) v. Smoluchowski, M. Bull. Acad. Krakau, 143 (1903).
(13) Reynolds, O. Philos. Trans. 174, 935 (1883).
(14) Ackerel, T. Handb. Phys. 7, 304, Berlin (1927).
(15) Stodola, A. and Lowenstein, L."* Steam and Gas Turbines, 1, 55-
67, New York (1927).
(16) Eason, A. B. Flow and Measurement of Air and Gases, London
(1919).
(17) Blasins, H. ForschArb. dtsch. Ing. 131 (1913).
(18) Manegold, E. Kolloidzschr. 81, 164 (1937).
(19) Kolloidzschr. 81, 269 (1937).
(20) Adzumi, H. Bull. chem. Soc. Japan, 12, 285 (1937).
(21) Bull. chem. Soc. Japan, 12, 292 (1937).
(22) Ramsay, W. and Collie, N. Proc. Roy. Soc. 60A, 106 (1897).
(23) Donnan, F. Phil. Mag. 49, 423 (1900).
(24) Sameshima, J . Bull. chem. Soc. Japan, 1, 5 (1926).
(25) Adzumi, H. Bull. chem. Soc. Japan, 12, 304 (1937).
(26) Preston, E. J. Soc. Glass. Tech. 18, 336 (1934).
(27) Kanz, A. Arch. Eisenhiittenw. 2, 843 (1929).
(28) Clews, F. and Green, A. Trans, ceram. Soc. 32, 295, 472 (1933).
(29) Bansen, H. Arch. Eisenhiittenw. 1, 687 (1927-8); Stahl u. Eisen,
48, 973(1928).
(30) Bremond, P. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 196, 1651 (1933).
REFERENCES 89
(31) Fancher, G. and Lewis, J. Industr. Engng. Chem. 25, 1139
(1933).
(32) Bartell, F. J. phys. Chem, 15, 659 (1911); 16, 318 (1912).
Bartell, F. and Carpenter, D. C. J. phys. Chem. 27, 252 (1923).
(33) Bartell, F. and Miller, F. Industr. Engng Chem. 20, 738 (1928).
(34) Bartell, F. and Osterhof, H. J. phys-. Chem. 32, 1553 (1928).
(35) Schlichter, C. Rep. U.S. geol. Surv. 2, 305 (1897-8).
(36) Chilton, J. and Colbourn, A. Industr. Engng Chem. 23, 913
(1931).
(37) Chalmers, J., Taliaferro, D. and Rawlins, E. Trans. Amer. Inst.
min. (metall.) Engrs, 98, 375 (1932).
(38) Wilde, H. and Moore, T. Oil Weekly, 67, 34 (1932).
(39) Cf. Fancher, G. and Lewis, J. Industr. Engng Chem. 25, 1139,
1143 (1933).
(40) Muskat, M. and Botset, H. Physics, 1, 27 (1931).
(41) Wyckoff, R., Potset, EL, Muskat, M. and Reed, D. Bull. A?ner.
Ass. Petrol. Geol. 18, 161 (1934).
(42) Green, H. and Ampt, G. J.Agric. Sci. 4, 1 (1911-12); 5, 1 (1912-
13).
(43) Narayanamurti, O. Z. Ver. dtsch. Ing. Bleiheft, Nr. 2, 13 (1936).
(44) Manegold, E. (with Hennenhofer). Kolloidzschr. 81, 278 (1937).
(45) Raisch, E. and Steger, H. Gesundheitsing, 57, 553 (1934).
(46) Raisch, E. Z.. Ver. dtsch. Ing. 80, 1257 (1936).
(47) Hertz, G. Z. Phys. 79, 108 (1932).
(48) Farkas, A. Light and Heavy Hydrogen, p. 120, Cambridge (1935).
(49) Harmsen, H. Z. Phys. 82, 589 (1933).
Harmsen, H., Hertz, G. and Schutze, W. Z. Phys.90,703 (1934).
(50) Wooldridge, D. and Smythe, W. Phys. Rev. 50, 233 (1936).
(51) Hertz, G. Z. Phys, 91, 810 (1934).
(52) Barwieh, H. Z. Phys. 100, 166 (1936).
(53) Capron, P., Delfosse, J., Hemptinne, M. de and Taylor, H. S.
J. chem. Phys. 6, 656 (1938).
Hemptinne, M. de and Capron, P. J. Phys. Radium, 10, 171
(1939).
(54) Scherr, R. J. chem. Phys. 6, 252 (1938).
(55) Clusius, K. and Dickel, G. Naturwissenschaften, 33, 546 (1938).
(56) Chapman, S. Phil. Mag. 7, 1 (1929).
(57) Korsching, H. and Wirtz, G. Naturwissenschaften, 20/21, 367
(1939).
(58) Waldmann, L. Naturwissenschaften, 14, 230 (1939).
Grinten, W. Naturwissenschaften, 19, 317 (1939).
Wirtz, K. Naturwissenschaften, 20/21, 369 (1939).
(59) Clusius, K. and Dickel, G. Naturwissenschaften, 28, 487, 148
(1939).
Groth, W. and Harteck, P. Naturwissenschaften, 34, 584 (1939).
(60) Frenkel, J. Z. Phys. 26, 117 (1924).
(61) Kalberer, W. and Mark,.H. Z. phys. Chem. 139A, 151 (1929).
90 MOLECULAR FLOW IN CAPILLARY SYSTEMS
(62) Barrer, R. Proc. Roy. Soc. 167A, 392 (1938).
(63) Tiselius, A. Z. phys. Chem. 169A, 425 (1934); 174A, 401 (1935);
Nature, Lond., 133, 212 (1934).
(64) Hey, M. Miner. Mag. 2\\ 99 (1935).
(65) Damkohler, G. Z. phys. Chem. 174A, 222 (1935).
(66) Wicke, E. Z. Elektrochem. 44, 587 (1938).
(67) Barrer, R. and Rideal, E. K. Proc. Roy. Soc. 149A, 231 (1935).
(68) Blythswood, Lord and Allen, H. S. Phil. Mag. 10, 497 (1905).
(69) Herbst, H. Kolloidchem. Beih. 21, 1 (1925).
(70) Dietl, A. Kolloidchem. Beih. 6, 127 (1914).
(71) Swan, E. and Urquhart, A. J. phys. Chem. 31, 251 (1927).
C H A P T E R III
n't
0 1 2 3 • 54
Fig. 19. The structures of some fibrous zeolites. The structure of one tetrahedron
chain is shown in (d'), in which the large circles represent silicon or
aluminium atoms, the small circles oxygen atoms, and the heights of the
atoms are given in A. The same chain is represented diagrammaticallv
in (d), where the numbers show the heights of silicon and aluminium
atoms as multiples of c/8 (the c-axis is 6-6 A., so that 3c/8 = 2-5 A..
5c/8 = 4-1 A.). The linked chains are shown in (a), (b), (c) as arranged in
edingtonite, thomsonite and the natrolite group, respectively, and in each
the unit cell is indicated by dotted lines.
Fig. 20. A lattice of two-dimensional laminae. Large circles represent oxygen
atoms, small circles silicon or aluminium atoms. The upper diagram repre-
sents a portion of an infinite sheet of tetrahedra in which all vertices are
supposed to point upward. If these vertices fie on a reflection plane, a
second similar tetrahedron sheet, in which all vertices point down, is linked
to the first. The lower diagram represents the appearance of the linked
sheets, which form a tetrahedron framework of finite thickness, when viewed
in the direction indicated by the arrow in the upper diagram.
0 10 20 3Q HO 50 60 70 80 90 100 1fO
WATER ~ % OF IGNITED MATERIAL
Fig. 21. The one-dimensional swelling of montmorillonite on hydration.
96 GAS FLOW IN CRYSTALS AND GLASSES
clays), in others (glasses and zeolites) considerable data have
been collected. It must be in the light of the main structural
features outlined that these data are examined. The mobility
of ions has been observed in ultramarines, clays, zeolites and
glasses—in the three former groups by base exchange experi-
ments, and in the latter because of its function as a hydrogen
electrode, or even as a sodium electrode. The mobility of
sodium (and potassium) ions in glass may be demonstrated in
an experiment used to prepare pure sodium in vacuo. The cell
NaNO 3 Na Conducting Glowing
Cu (molten) glass evacuated space tungsten filament
is constructed by dipping an evacuated soda glass bulb into
molten sodium nitrate, into which dips a copper electrode.
Inside the evacuated bulb is a hot tungsten filament, which,
by thermionic emission, renders the evacuated space con-
ducting. On making the tungsten negative with respect to
the copper, metallic sodium appears inside the glass bulb.
Introductory
Having briefly reviewed zeolitic structure and properties,
one is in a position to consider diffusion within these
crystals. The most complete and satisfactory studies are
those of A. Tiselius (5,6), whose methods and data will now
be considered. In crystals such as NaCl, lattice diffusion is
possible only at elevated temperatures because no channels
are available for the diffusion. Very often, as when thorium
diffuses in tungsten, diffusion occurs down the only available
channels, the grain boundaries and faults in the tungsten
crystal. In interstitial compounds such as zeolites there are,
when the crystal is dehydrated, numerous channels through
the lattice left by the evacuated water, and so diffusion by
spreading through interstices, as opposed to high temperature
processes of diffusion by place exchange, may occur.
DIFFUSION OF WATER AND AMMONIA 97
2000
Seconds
Fig. 22. x'2 as a function of t at constant C.
0 50 100 150
t in seconds
Fig. 24. C as a function of x at constant t.
t C9-Cx .0 £>xlO7
% sec. cP-c0 p cm.2 sec."1
130 $1 0-905 1181 2-4
13-5 93 0-837 0-986 30
140 112 0-770 0-849 3-4
14-5 140 0-701 0-734 3-6
15-0 169 0-634 0-639 3-9
15-5 212 0-566 0-553 4-2
160 283 0-498 0-475 4-2
16-5 377 0-430 0-402 4-4
170 577 0-363 0-334 4-4
17-5 1060 0-294 0-267 3-6
180 1755 0-227 0-204 3-7
t c,-cx DxlO7
% sec. P cm.2 sec. *
op-c0
16-5 60 0-915 1-218 40
170 119 0-770 0-894 40
17-5 218 0-625 0-627 41
180 398 0-482 0-457 4-2
18-5 984 0-342 0313 3-8
190 1520 0-266 0-240 41
DIFFUSION OF WATER AND AMMONIA 101
dt ~ dx\
for which solutions(5,6) have been given (Chap. I). Of use in
evaluating D is the expression
~ 1 dxc
xdC,
c% •^201 • a '001
13-21 3-6
14-43 3-4
15-50 3-5
16-25 3-2
17-36 3-4
Z)xlO 8
t
sec. v< zLTxlO7 cm.2 sec."1
0 0 0 1-4
900 30 40 10
3,600 60 60 1-4
8,100 90 119 1-2
14,400 120 151 1-2
22,500 150 183 —
The diffusion rate was the same for a plate cut parallel
to the diagonal surface, so that no anisotropy occurs. The
temperature dependence of the diffusion velocity was found
using powdered analcite, and the equation
AQoc(Cp-(
where AQ denotes the amount sorbed. This equation supposes
that D does not depend upon AQ. If one writes
AQ =0=f{Dt)
Cp — Co
only, the curve 6 versus the time, t, or Jt, should be the same
at all pressures. I t was shown that this was so for two
rate curves at 302° C, one with analcite outgassed and
p = 758-6 mm., the other with the analcite saturated at
p0 = 578-6, a further dose of ammonia being admitted at
1385-4 mm. Then since 6 =f(D,t) only,
Dm In
Vrp
1
1
Dn
and a simple method is available to determine the temperature
coefficients and activation energies. The temperature de-
pendence of the diffusion coefficient gave the activation energy
for diffusion as 11,480 cal./mol. It was also noted that the
OF WATER AND AMMONIA 105
ratio of the diffusion constants at two different temperatures
was not dependent upon the amounts of ammonia sorbed.
^—~~~
J ! 3J0
autooa. alytic >' 08
absorption >v/
/
220 «
^-adsorption
120 00 /
1
t (in days) *in min )
Fig. 26. Sorption velocities. NH3 on natrolite, showing tendency to autocatalytic
sorption rate curves. (NH3 sorbed before commencing expt. = 12-11 c.c.
at N.T.P. Inset shows NH3 on heulandite, sorption rate following the
parabolic diffusion law.)
laminated crystal like mica, outgassed at low temperatures
(130° C.) to prevent lattice collapse, sorbed ammonia a t first
rapidly and then more and more slowly, suggesting a rising
activation energy with charge. When heated to 330° C , how-
ever, heulandite sorbed ammonia much more slowly. Some
profound change in the bonding between laminae must have
been effected by the high temperatures, associated with the
more complete removal of water. For heulandite crystals it
will also be seen (Fig. 26) that the sorption rate obeyed the
parabolic diffusion law initially, although this law quickly
broke down. I n natrolite, a fibrous zeolite, sorption in its early
106 GAS FLOW IN CRYSTALS AND GLASSES
2 eVoftf
Fig. 27. Optical absorption bands of KH-KBr solid in which about half
the KH has been decomposed photochemically giving "Farbzentren".
* = ( (KM)
ST^° (Mass Action).
It was established through the optical absorption of successive
thin layers of the crystal that the potassium hydride gradient
decreased inwards nearly linearly with distance, and it was
112 GAS FLOW IN CRYSTALS AND GLASSES
then found that two equations for the depth of penetration, x,
of hydride could be derived (12) according as the hydrogen
diffused as molecules (1) or as atoms (2):
(1)
(2)
In the relation (1), k is the Henry's law solubility coefficient
for molecular hydrogen in the crystal. Experiment showed (12)
that equation (1) was correct, so that hydrogen is both dis-
solved as molecules and diffuses as molecules. The derived
value for D was 2-3 x lO^cm^sec." 1 at 680° C.
-to' •10'
25
X /
*/ 20
A{• / o
15
/*
>
X
V
/
5 20° 6 00°
10 20 30 <W 10 20 30 VO
H2-pressure in Atm.
Concentration N Concentration N Concentration N
• 4,G.1O 6 | • 1,5.10" I • 4,4-lO17>|
x l,6.1017[K/cm? x 4,4.10 !7 }K/cm? x 14,-1018 JK/cm?
O911<H O2,2.l0l8j
G 5 -10 1 7 Br/cm? D 3,2-10" Br/cm? D 3,2-10" Br/cm?
Fig. 29. The linear relation between Nx2/t and p0.
the thallium within the crystal was large compared with the
concentration of absorbed halogen (Fig. 30). If n is the
quantity of halogen (expressed in atoms) diffusing through
unit cross-section in time t, one may write
dn
- DdC - n{C)*
at dt — U —z — JLJ
ax gradient
since an approximately linear halogen x was established.
Thus 2
114 GAS FLOW IN CRYSTALS AND GLASSES
and so according as diffusion occurs as atoms (or ions), or as
x2
molecules, one would have — N a linear function of y/p or p
respectively. When the experiments were made it was shown
that the diffusion occurred mainly as molecules (ii). Table 18
then gives the results for D for
Boundary
several temperatures and at several of Crystal
halogen pressures. In Table 18 are Ha tide Excess Thallium
N
included some diffusion constants
for potassium vapour, determined
by an electrical method (ii). It is Halogen
Vapour
possible that some diffusion of
bromine occurs as a diffusion of ions
or atoms, but parallel measurements
of DBf by the electrical conductivity
method showed that at high pressures
(above 1 atm.) transport of bromine Pig . 30. Schematic representa-
as Br~ was much less important tion of the permeation of
than its transport as Br2. Below ^alKum-containing halide
r
* by halogen.
1 atm. a greater percentage of
dissociation occurred, with consequent enhancement of the
percentage of transfer as ions.
Since the diffusion of hydrogen and of halogen is mainly as
molecules, and since they are dissolved within the halide in the
molecular state, one may include them in the same family of
diffusion systems as gas-silica (p. 117) and gas-rubber systems,
i.e. non-specific activated diffusions. They differ from the
latter systems in one respect—the solution processes in the
halides are highly endothermic (p. I l l ) compared with the
very slight endothermicity of hydrogen solubility in silica
(p. 140) and the slight exothermicity of hydrogen solubility in
rubbers (p. 418, Chap. IX). The temperature coefficients of
bromine diffusion in potassium bromide are small (Table 18).
and correspond to energies from 3k.cal./g.mol. at 1 atm.
pressure to 8k.cal./g.mol. at 16 atm. pressure. For hydrogen
the energy is about 8 k.cal./g.mol. in potassium bromide, while
for potassium it is about 16 k.cal./g. atom in the same crystal.
DIFFUSION IN ALKALI HALIDE CRYSTALS 115
-Fusto SIUCA
«- SorrGLASS
V V
Fig. 31. Types of double-walled diffusion cell.
* Calculated (io) from the force law E= -oc/W+fi/R12, when the constants
a and ft are derived from the virial coefficients of the equation of state of the gas.
(i)
(2)
(3)
dt
124 GAS FLOW IN CRYSTALS AND GLASSES
4-5 \
Log (Permeation velocity
jti
1-4 78
1000/T (Tin °K.)
Fig. 33. Passage of helium through silica.
\
4-5
\
s \
5-5 \
10 1-5
7000/7 (T in °K.)
Fig. 34. Passage of hydrogen through silica.
Irreversible effects
Several interesting points arose from Barrer's(28) study of the
influence of temperature upon the permeation rate. First, the
permeability towards the heavier gases is affected by prolonged
heating to high temperatures. This is shown by the permeation
rates of air through a silica tube, given as a function of tem-
perature for various periods of heat treatment of the silica
(Fig. 35). The flowing curves are drawn through points
determined in sequence, and the permeability decreases as the
heating is prolonged. That the effect was solely a surface one
was shown by treatment with hydrofluoric acid, which restored
the permeation rate to its original value. This superficial
change was probably connected with a visible clouding of the
surface, and it was thought that it might be due to the
formation of tiny crystals, possibly platy (3) or else of /?-cristo-
balite type. With an ensuing decrease in permeability there was
an increase in the activation energy which is clearly indicated
TABLE 22. The temperature coefficients of permeability constants in glasses in cal./mol.
Gas Glass Energy Author Remarks
He Fused silica 5,600 T'sai and Hogness(30> The energy of activation increases as
Fused silica 5,700 Barrer (28) the percentage of SiO2 decreases
Fused silica 5,390 Braaten and Clark (29)
Pyrex 8,700 van Voorhi8(36)
Thuringian 11,300 Piutti and Boggiolera(37)
Lead — Urryd7) Permeation observed but influence of
Soda — Urryd7) temperature not studied
Jena 1 6 m 8,720 Urryd7)
Ne Fused silica 9,500 T'sai and Hogness(30)
H2 Fused silica I 9,300 Williams and Ferguson(32)
Fused silica I I 10,000 Williams and Ferguson (32)
Fused silica III 10,000 Williams and Ferguson (32)
Fused silica IV 10,800 Williams and Ferguson (32)
Fused silica I 10,900 Barrer(28)
Fused silida II 10,800 Barrer(28) After prolonged heating, causing super-
ficial crystallisation
Fused silica 8,500 Mayer (38)
Fused silica 9,200 Johnson and Burt(39)
Fused silica 12,000 Wustner(24) At up to 800 atm.
Pyrex — Urryu7) Permeation observable
Pyrex — Williams and Ferguson(32) Permeation not observed
Jena — Williams and Ferguson (32) Permeation not observed
N2 Fused silica 26,000 Johnson and Burt(39)
Fused silica 22,000 Barrer(28)
Fused silica 29,900 Barrer(28) After prolonged heating with surface
change
02 Fused silica 31,200 Barrer(28) After prolonged heating and cleaning
with hydrofluoric acid
Air Fused silica [18,500] Barrer<28) Apparent energy only
Fused silica, after pro- [22,000] Barrer(28) A different sample of silica from that
longed heating used for author's other data
Argon Fused silica, after pro- [48,000] Barrer(28) A very slow rate of permeation indeed
longed heating
Fused silica 32,100 Barrer(28> A fresh surface obtained by treatment
with HF, and much greater perme-
ability
PERMEABILITY OF GLASSES TO GASES 127
in Table 22. These effects were most marked for the heavy gases
(N2, Ar, and air), whereas for hydrogen and helium the influence
of heating upon the permeability was slight. This fact, and the
close agreement of the temperature coefficients of the per-
meability when expressed in cal./mol.,* determined by various
1-25
£> 100 t
l 0'75
J 0-50
$
V.
^ 0-25
-4-5
8
1§ -6-5 \
-7 5 \
-85
10 • •5 2O
way the silica content affects the activation energy for the
process. The smaller the silica content, the larger is the
activation energy and the smaller the permeation rate (cf.
p. 137). The passage of helium through a number of glasses of
known composition (36) also revealed that acidic oxides such
as B2O3 or SiO2 increased the permeability, while basic oxides
such as K 2 O, Na2O, or BaO decreased it approximately in
proportion to their amount. Feebly basic or amphoteric oxides
such as PbO or A12O3(36) were stated to have little effect
upon the permeability. It is to be noted that A12O3 may
replace SiO2 in the anionic network of the silica membrane.
* See footnote, p. 127.
BD 9
130 GAS FLOW IN CRYSTALS AND GLASSES
Roeser(40) studied the permeability of various samples of
unglazed and glazed porcelain in air. He found many samples
with channels so large that stream-line or Knudsen flow
occurred in them; but in other more perfect specimens only
a strongly temperature sensitive diffusion was observed. The
experiments, which were made up to 1300° C, gave varied
agreement with the law
Permeability constant* = Poe~EIRT,
tne products of some manufacturers giving linear curves
of log (P) versus l/T, while other manufacturers' products
behaved more or less capriciously. The slope of the curve
log (P) versus l/T even at the highest temperatures varied
from specimen to specimen. The slopes observed at high
temperatures for one set of porcelain tubes varied from 29,000
to 63,000 cal. All these results suggest that grain-boundary
diffusion is a more usual process than lattice diffusion, in
conformity with Barrer's(28) findings for the migration of the
heavier gases through silica glass. In this connection it may
be mentioned that Roeser's results on silica glass and on glazed
and unglazed porcelain give permeability constants of similar
magnitude. Porcelain may be considered to consist of crystals
of mullite (3Al2O3.2SiO2) embedded in a glass magna, and
often with undissolved quartz or clay in the structure. It is
clear that such a chemical will be far from homogeneous, and
to this chemical inhomogeneity as well as to its physical
inhomogeneity may be ascribed its capricious behaviour.
Further studies on irreversible phenomena associated with
helium diffusion through pyrex glass were made by Taylor and
Rast(4i). The effects noted by them were not confined to the
surface of the glass, as were those observed by Barrer (28). They
found that the permeability constant rose by 10 % at about
550e C , after annealing at that temperature, and that there-
after the new permeability-temperature curve lay above the
* Even with a single energy of activation for each gas, this law could not be
rigidly obeyed when air diffuses, since air is a mixture of N2 and O2 and the law
should be P =P1e-E°JRT+P2e-E*JRT.
PERMEABILITY OF GLASSES TO GASES 131
old one. The effect was considered to be the result of strain
removal in the original glass, the curve log (permeability)
against 1/7 being now continuous into the region where the
glass could be regarded as a viscous liquid. The diminution in
slope at lower temperatures which have been interpreted (28)
as increasingly important contributions of grain-boundary
diffusion were also noted, the slopes giving values of
^440-eoooc. = 7150cal./atom,
^35o-44O°c. = 6480 cal./atom,
which may be compared with the values of E in Table 23.
However, the authors regarded this diminution as due to a loss
of rotational or vibrational freedom in the silicate complex,
occurring at a critical temperature. As a further change in the
slope of the log (P) versus \\T curve had occurred at 225° C,
one must on this theory suppose a second loss of rotational or
vibrational freedom.
Curye I. Diam.square,5-4A:
- £. .. .. 5-6A
n m. " - S-OA.
- J7. * » 6-4A
5 4 3 2 / 0 7 . 2 3 4 5
Distance, (A).
Fig. 37. Energy needed to make an argon atom pass through
a square of argon atoms.
200 0022 __ _ _ __
300 0099 0051
400 0-366 0-48 0-44 0-50 0-275
500 0-70 0-92 0-84 — 106 — 0-58
600 1-43 1-75 1-54 216 200 0-81
700 2-52 31 2-70 2-45 3-9 2-76 1-70
800 4-25 4-8 4-4 40 60 4-5 2-53
900 6-4 70 5-9 3-6
1000 100 — — — — 51
Author: Roeser.
REFERENCES
(1) Taylor, W. H. Proc. Roy. Soc. 145A, 80 (1934).
(2) Barrer, R. M. Proc. Roy. Soc. 167A, 392 (1938).
(3) Shishacow, N. A. Phil. Mag. 24, 687 (1937).
(4) Nagelschmidt, G. Z. Kristallogr. 93, 481 (1936).
(4 a) Farkas, A. Private communication.
(5) Tiselius, A. Z. phys. Chem. 169 A, 425 (1934).
(6) Z. phys. Chem. 174 A, 401 (1935).
(7) Hey, M. Miner. Mag. 24, 99 (1935).
(8) Phil. Mag. 22, 492 (1936).
(9) Mollwo, E. Z.Phys. 85, 56 (1933).
(10) Rogener, H. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 29, 387 (1937).
(11) Mollwo, E. Ann. Phys., Lpz.,29, 394 (1937).
(12) Hilsch, R. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 29, 407 (1937).
(13) E.g. see Faraday Society Discussion, "Chemical Reactions in-
volving Solids", pp. 883 et seq. (1938).
(13a) Durau, F. and Schratz, V. Z. phys. Chem. 159A, 115 (1932).
(136) Herbert, J. Trans. Faraday Soc. 26, 118 (1930).
(13 c) Tompkins, F. C. Trans. Faraday Soc. 34, 1469 (1938).
(13d) Kraft, H. Z. Phys. 110, 303 (1938).
(14) Bradley, R. Trans. Faraday Soc. 30, 587 (1934).
(15) Rayleigh, Lord. Proc. Roy. Soc. 156 A, 350 (1936).
(16) Proc. Roy. Soc. 163 A, 377 (1937).
(17) Urry, W. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 55, 3242 (1933).
(18) Watson, W. J. chem. Soc. 97, 810 (1910).
(19) Villard, P. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 130, 1752 (1900).
(20) Berthelot, M. C.R. Acad. Sci.t Paris, 140, 821 (1905).
(21) Jaquerod, A. and Perrot, F. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 139, 789
(1904).
(22) Richardson, O. and Richardson, R. C. Phil. Mag. 22, 704 (1911).
(23) Bodenstein, M. and Kranendieck, F. Nernst Festschrift, p. 99
(1912).
(24) Wustner, H. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 46, 1095 (1915).
(25) Alty, T. Phil. Mag. 15, 1035 (1933).
REFERENCES 143
(26) Ward, A. F. Proc. Roy. Soc. 133 A, 506, 522 (1931).
(27) Lennard-Jones, J. E. Trans. Faraday Soc. 28, 333 (1932).
(28) Barrer, R. M. J. chem. Soc. 378 (1934).
(29) Braaten, E.O. and Clark, G. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 57, 2714 (1935).
(30) T'sai, L. S. and Hogness, T. J. phys. Chem. 36, 2595 (1932T).
(31) Burton, E., Braaten, E. O. and Wilhelm, J. O. Canad. J. Res.
21, 497 (1933).
(32) Williams, G. A. and Ferguson, J. B. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 44,
2160 (1922).
(33) Urry, W. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 54, 3887 (1932).
(34) Paneth, F. and Peters, K. Z. phys. Chem. I B , 253 (1928).
(35) Smithells,C.andRansley,C.E. Proc. Roy. Soc. 150 A, 172(1935).
(36) van Voorhis, C. C. Phys. Rev. 23, 557 (1924).
(37) Piutti, A. and Boggiolera, E. R.C. Accad. Lincei (5), 14 (1923).
Also R.C. Accad. Sci. Napoli (3) 29, 111 (1923).
(38) Mayer, E. Phys. Rev. 6, 283 (1915).
(39) Johnson, J. and Burt, R. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 6, 734 (1922).
(40) Roeser, W. Bur. Stand. J. Res., Wash., 7, 485 (1931).
(41) Taylor, 1ST. W. and Rast, W. J. chem. Phys. 6, 612 (1938).
(42) Williams, G. A. and Ferguson, J. B. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 46, 635
(1924).
C H A P T E R IV
INTRODUCTION
P- D™
dx
where D is the diffusion constant and dC/dx is the con-
centration gradient, defined in certain circumstances by the
solubility of the gas in the metal.
For the study of gas-metal systems one has all the apparatus
and technique developed for measuring the sorption of gases
by solids (15). The powerful X-ray method then gives the crystal
habit of the products (16), or shows the effect the absorption has
upon lattice constants (17), so that one may construct the phase
diagrams for the system. Absorption equilibria have been
studied for over a decade by Sieverts and his co-workers (18)
and by many others, and as a result these often remarkable
systems are being increasingly understood. Summaries of
findings on gas-metal equilibria will be found in the books of
McBain(is) and of Smithells(i9), and it is not intended to give
more than a resume of the data here.
The metals which absorb common gases are summarised in
Table 39. Oxides are not mentioned in the table; but apart
from oxygen, hydrogen interacts most freely with metals, not
as a rule to give hydrides but rather alloy systems, or solid
146 GAS FLOW THROUGH METALS
UJ
UJ
amount, and one travels along the invariant part of the curve.
When the initial dilute or a-phase is all consumed the system
becomes once more univariant, and also the lattice is nearly
saturated. The limiting composition is not certain but is of
70
7U0 mm. Isobar
per gm. Pd
60
\
50
5
5
V*
20
10 -04
Ti, Ta, but endothermic for Cu, Fe, Co, and Ni. From the
slopes of log (solubility)- IJT curves (24) (Fig. 42) the heats of
solution given in Table 40 have been calculated. In some of
the metals, notably those in which hydrogen dissolves endo-
thermically, there is no appreciable alteration in the lattice
constants on solution of the gas in the metal. On the other
hand, when hydrogen dissolves in palladium one may have
at saturation 10 % expansion of the lattice. In the metals
Ti, V, Zr, Th, and Ta, where great quantities of hydrogen are
* The dissolved hydrogen is supposed to occupy interstitial positions in the
palladium lattice. These positions of minimum energy are referred to as potential
°nergy "holes" in the lattice.
152 GAS FLOW THROUGH METALS
absorbed, the systems approach a limiting composition and
have a new lattice structure. The densities and limiting com-
positions in the expanded states are illustrated by Table 41.
Tl
Zr __ - — —*
~~—*•
/
V-
7
- — ^ — I —
Th
V
4 /
/
—^^ Pd
f.
-———
°-
CO
g
?
1 •^—*.
• * - —
0 V s
-1 \ s e
-2 \
-3
\
Cu
-4
10 - 12 18 20 22
10.000/T
Fig. 42. Observed solubilities s of hydrogen in various metals subjected to one
atmosphere pressure of H2, shown by plotting log^s against 104/JT. The
solubility s is the volume of H2 gas (reckoned in c.c. at N.T.P.) absorbed by
100 g. of metal.
kT
c
154 GAS FLOW THROUGH METALS
where v8 = concentration of dissolved atoms, m
k = Boltzmann constant,
h — Planck's constant,
m = the mass of the hydrogen atom,
I = the moment of inertia of the "hydrogen molecule,
w2 = the weight of the normal electronic state of the
hydrogen molecule,
Xa = the heat of solution of a hydrogen atom in the
metal,
Xd = the heat of dissociation of a hydrogen molecule.
Smithells and Fowler (24) showed that if one defines s, the
solubility, as the number of c.c. of molecular hydrogen at
N.T.P., dissolved in 100 g. of metal, the formula above
reduced to ^
-s \JcTJ r
L A3 2h2 J
where s0 denotes the saturation solubility. Inserting standard
numerical values gives
Oxygen-metal systems
When definite chemical compounds are not formed it should
be possible to apply statistical considerations similar to those
above to other gas-metal systems. Often, however, as in the
system O2-Ag, the nature of the solution process is not
,- PRB88 - tO CMS f
a 40 •<
1
3 .< 90 it I
4 10 .»
I 1
s /I
V' // /
V
N O~^
0
y
// / i
o
o .
r.
7700 Liquid (Fet0)
+
/ r
Liquid(feOtFe)
7500
S-t-Liquid Fe
7300
y+FeO
7700
Solid Solution
Oxygen in Iron
$00
ct+FeO
700
0-5 7-0 20 25
Oxygen Atoms. %
Fig. 44. Temperature-composition phase diagram for O2-Fe.
Nitrogen-metal systems
In order for nitrogen to be absorbed by a metal it is necessary
that the metal should be capable of forming a nitride. Thus,
while nitrogen is not absorbed by Cu, Co, Ag, and Au, it is
taken up by the metals Fe, Mo, W, Mn, Al, and Zr. A great
variety of phases is observed in some of these systems.
Nitrogen-molybdenum(35,36) gives the following:
a (Mo): body-centred cubic. No solid solution with nitrogen.
158 GAS FLOW THROUGH METALS
/? (M03N): face-centred tetragonal. Stable only above
600° C. Contains 25 % atomic nitrogen.
y (Mo2N): face-centred cubic. Stable at all temperatures,
and contains 33 % atomic nitrogen.
S (MoN): hexagonal. Contains 50 % atomic nitrogen.
Because of the use of iron catalysts for ammonia synthesis,
the nitrogen-iron phase diagram is especially interesting (37,38)
(Fig. 45). Other systems, such as nitrogen-manganese (39),
nitrogen-aluminium (40), and nitrogen-zirconium (34), need not
5 70 75 20 25
Nitrogen Atoms, %
Fig. 45. Temperature-composition phase diagram of N2-Fe.
a = solid solution N 2 in Fe, y = solid solution N"2 in Fe, y' - Fe 4 N,
c = Fe3N.
10 15 20
Atoms % of Boron
Fig. 47. Solubility of H2 in B-Pd alloys.
«
\ .
H^drogen-Iron
Lindbloi n)
\ \
V
\ \>
Nitrogen-Steel
itrogen-St
\
monoxide-Ste
(Ryderf
>encer)
0
Oxyg en- \
\
Hydrogen - Platinum
Silver ( W d N !
S i \
SO
omba^p
\
V- <
\
(Den ingj o*
o
\
(Lombard *Eichner)
0 10 12 14
10000
Figs. 51 and 52. Effect of temperature on the rate of flow of gases through metals.
166 GAS FLOW THROUGH METALS
upon their treatment. They solved Fick's law for the special
case of a gas dissociating in the medium and diffusing as atoms.
In the stationary state, when d2C/dx2 = 0, they found
1
P - 95-4 mm.
X
N
N
b/mm.
s.
\
X\ \
\
s_
'1
p - )-08mn
fs \ N
ion Ve
°\
\ \
to
s
I \ H> drogef
o
N trogen
\ \
)rnrn. ^
\
\
10000
Q = 6-60 x io
(c.c./sec./cm.2/ E
System mm. thick/ (cal./g. atom) Author
atm. press.)
H2—Ni 14,600, 13,100 Post and Ham(ei)
(below Curie
point)
— 13,100, 12,040 Post and Ham(ci)
(above Curie
point)
1-3 xlO" 2 15,420 Lombard (57)
0-85 x 10- 2 13,860 Deming and Hendricks(62)
1-4 xlO- 2 13,800 Borelius and Lindblom<3-2)
105 x lO- 2 13,400 H a m (50)
1-44 x lO"2 13,260 Smithells and Ransley(60)
— 13,400 Post and Ham(5i)
H2—Pt-Ni — 13,400 H a m (50)
H2—Pt 1-41 x 10- 2 19,600 Richardson, Nicol and
2
1-18 xlO~ 18,000 H a m (3-j)
2-6 xlO" 1 19,800 Jouan(63)
H2—Ni-Pt — 18,000 H a m (50)
H2—Mo 0-93 x lO- 2 20,200 Smithells and Ransley(60)
H2—Pd 5.000 Melville and Rideal(64)
— 17,800 Melville and Rideal(64)
2-3 xlO" 1 4,620 Lombard, Eichner and
Albert (53)
3 0 xlO~ 2 10,500 Barrer<53)
H2—Ni-Pd — 14,300 Melville and Rideal(64)
H2—Cu 2-3 xlO- 3 16,600 Smithells and Ransley(60)
1-5 xlO- 3 18,700 Braaten and Clark (65)
H2—Cu-Pd 13,700 Melville and Rideal<64)
— 11,400 Melville and Rideal(64)
H2—Fe 1-63x10-3 9,600 Smithells and Ransleycco)
1-60 x lO- 3 9.400 Borelius and Lindblom(52>
2-40 x lO- 3 11,000 Ryder (60)
— 8,700 Post and Ham(3i)
(below 900cC.)
— 18,860 Post and Ham(5i)
(above 900° C.)
H2—Al 3-3-4-2 30,800 Smithells and Ransley(67)
O2-Ag 3-75 x 10- 2 22,600 Spencer (OS)
206 x lO- 2 22,600 Johnson and Larose(56)
N2—Mo 8-3 xlO-- 45,000 Smithells and Ransley(eo)
N2—Fe 4-5 xlO-* 23,800 R y d e r (66)
CO—Fe 1-3 x l O 3 18.600 Ryder <s«>
INFLUENCE OF PRESSURE 169
* IAJ denotes the concentration of H-atoms just inside the ingoing surface
(x = 0) and jCH the concentration at the outgoing surface (x = /).
INFLUENCE OF PRESSURE 171
which gives the observed relationship if VG^HJ^AAO^H.)* a s
is the case when one side of the metal is held at a near-vacuum.
This preliminary treatment is, however, very much too simple.
It was first noted by Borelius and Lindblom (52) that even when
one side of the metal was held under a vacuum, the diffusion
isotherms appeared to obey a relationship (Fig. 54)
30
0
702°C. y
*70 s /
20
532X.
10
******
360*1
0
10 15 20 25 30
, in mms.
Fig. 54. Permeation rate-pressure isotherms of Borelius and Lindblom (52).
/ 760°K
7
z
7
0 5 10 15 20 25
Fig. 5J5. Permeation rate-pressure isotherms for H2-Pd.
y 723 9 K.
y
1 yX y
0 2 4 6 ft 10 VP
I
0 1 2 3 4 5
Vp(Atm/2)
Fig. 57. H2-Fe, the permeation velocity as a function of pressure, at 100° C,
0-6
\
/ \
0-5 200
500 400
Temperature *C.
0-6
1
/ r \
\
>/
V
05
500 4O0
1^ 300 200
Temperature °C.
Fig. 58. Exponents n in expression permeation rate = A;pw(H2-Ni)
for two different samples of Ni.
Rate = i f e~blT.
Their data are shown in Fig. 59. A similar result was obtained
by Lombard and Eichner(09) at pressures of 26kg./cm.2 for
176 GAS FLOW THROUGH METALS
>
n
f
e
y
o
5 !0
VP (Atmospheres)
Fig. 59. Diffusion of hydrogen through nickel at 248° C.
as1 o
If
I I
0L _ ] o
VP (Mm.)
Fig. 60. Diffusion of oxygen through nickel at 900° C.
3) Adsorbed atom
atom
Metal Metal
(T)-(?) Molecule
00 /f777777y77Z (T) Adsorbed atom
% O f V ) T<
In this equation a = Gp/B (Gp denotes the atomic heat of
dissolved gas atoms), pl9p2 = pressures of gas at the ingoing
and outgoing surfaces respectively of a plate of thickness Z,
and AH0 is defined by AH = AH0 + (|—2a) RT (AH denotes
the heat of desorption of two atoms of gas from the metal to
the gas, as a molecule). But since we are dealing with an
activated diffusion, D can be further written as D = Doe~~EIRTy
where E denotes the activation energy for diffusion.
Riemann's equation, Richardson's equation (p. 167) and
equation (v), p. 170 all suffer from one grave defect. It has
been assumed that the concentrations just inside the solid are
equilibrium concentrations, and this is only true where there
are no rate-controlling phase-boundary processes. There do
in fact seem to be no slow phase-boundary processes for
diffusion through rubbers (79), but this is not so for diffusion
through metals. Melville and Rideal (C4) made the first attempt
to include possible phase-boundary processes in the equation
of flow. Other possible phase-boundary processes were given
by Smithells and Ransley(76), Wang(80), and Barrer(8i). They
regarded the following as possible:
Rate = M J 1 - ^ )
(kx is the velocity constant of the reaction, dx the fraction of
the surface covered by adsorbed atoms, C H is the concentration
180 GAS FLOW THROUGH METALS
of hydrogen gas just inside the metal, and Cs is the concen-
tration of hydrogen in the metal when saturated with the gas)
(ii) A dissolved atom re-enters the surface:
Rate = &2^H(^ — ^i)#
(iii) A molecule strikes the surface and is adsorbed as atoms:
TABLE 43
© Ser
•**
6*0
1
4-0
•8 ft
Series I I 0 ^ - —
2*0
Series III
In -^ = Jet, and kt j = In 2
Half-life of per- AE
T°C. Gas meation process Ratio
(min.) H/D (kg.cal.)
•^(apparent)
Reaction Author
cal./mol.
AHn - AHB =
and
ET2 ^logy^-^ = +260 cal. (T = 1200° K.).
410
t = log 0D - -^ + log 104
10
800*C.
j
1
/
/
>
sso'c.
35 36 37 38 39 20 40 60 60
Temperature (in millivolts) Per cent Nickel
Fig. 63. Fig. 64.
Fig. 63. The permeability curve for iron.
Fig. 64. Effect of composition upon rate of H2-permeation through Ni-Cu alloy.
V
A
\
\
A\ V
\V / > s
... •M ^« AA-
'h 1 S 10 1S 20
r
Time in hours
Fig. 65. H2-permeability of nickel as a function of time of heating.
/
50
/1
\ :
:
•A / {
t
:
/
1
; }
20
I / I
w • I• —
/ . /
0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Temperature in °C.
Fig. 66. Effects of heat-treatment upon the permeability of palladium (96>.
I Z 3 i 5 6 7
Hours
Fig. 67. Effect of surface treatment on the permeability of
aluminium to H2 at 580° G.
Run 1. Al exposed to air.
Run 2. Outer surface scratched.
Run 3. Outer surface scratched again.
Run 4. Outer surface scratched again.
Run 5. Inner and outer surfaces scratched.
Run 6. Outer surface anodically oxidised.
-2-0
1*
r
0? 02
VT (i in amps per cm.2)
Fig. 69. Fig. 70.
Fig. 69. Volumes of hydrogen simultaneously evolved and diffused by the
action of citric acid on fast corroding steel.
Fig. 70. The electrolytic diffusion of hydrogen through iron as a function of
current density. Fe, 0-18% C. x = untreated. O = annealed.
100°
/ / /
r /i°c.
/7r°c.
1-0
/
/
/
^2^-0—
300 600
Time in minutes
Fig. 72. Time lag in establishing steady state of flow of H 2 through
a steel cathode (53).
REFERENCES
(1) Graham, T. Phil. Mag. (4), 32, 401 (1866); Ann. Phys., Lpz.,
129, 549 (1866); Chem. Zbl. 38, 129 (1867).
(2) Cailletet, L. CM. Acad. Sci., Paris, 58, 327 and 1057 (1864).
(3) Deville,H. andTroost, L. C J ^ c a d . £c*\, Pans, 56, 977 (1863).
(4) Troost, L. CM. Acad. Sci., Paris, 98, 1427 (1884).
(5) Reynolds, 0. Proc. Manchr lit. phil. Soc. 13, 93 (1874).
(6) Ramsay, W. Phil. Mag. 38, 206 (1894).
(7) Bellati and Lussana. Atti. 1st. veneto, 1, 1173 (1890).
(8) Winkelmann, A. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 6, 104 (1901); 17, 591
(1905); 19, 1045 (1906).
(9) Richardson, O. Phil Mag. (6), 7, 266 (1904).
Richardson, O., Nicol, J. and Parnell, T. Phil. Mag. (6), 8, 1
(1904).
(10) Charpy, G. and Bonnerot, S. CM. Acad. Sci., Paris, 154, 592
(1912).
(11) Bodenstein, M. Z. Elektrochem. 28, 517 (1922).
(12) Nernst, W. and Leasing, A. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Gottingen, 146
(1902).
(13) Alexejew, D. and Polukarew, O. Z. Elektrochem. 32, 248 (1926).
(14) Aten, A. and Zieren, M. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bas, 49, 641
(1930).
(15) SeeMcBain, J. W. Sorptionof Gases by Solids,Routledge (1932).
(16) E.g. Zr-H 2 , Hagg, G. Z. phys. Chem. 11, 433 (1931).
(17) E.g. Pd-H 2 , Linde, J. and Borelius, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 84, 747
(1927).
Krtiger, F. and Gehm, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 16, 174 (1933).
(18) A full list of references to work of Sieverts and his co-workers
up to 1930 is given in J. W. McBain, Sorption of Gases by
Solids (1932). Other later references will be given subsequently.
(19) Smithells, C. Gases and Metals, Chapman and Hall (1937).
(20) Emeleus, H. and Anderson, J. Modern Aspects of Inorganic
Chemistry, Chap. 13, Routledge (1938).
(21) Sieverts, A. and Zapf, G. Z. phys. Chem. 174A, 359 (1935).
Sieverts, A. and Danz, W. Z. phys. Chem. 34 B, 158 (1936).
(22) Lacher, J. Proc. Roy. Soc. 161 A, 525 (1937).
(23) Smithells, C. Gases and Metals, pp. 153 et seq. (1937).
(24)- Smithells, C. and Fowler, R. H. Proc. Roy. Soc. 160 A, 38 (1937).
(25) Sieverts, A. and Hagenacker, J. Z.phys. Chem. 68, 115 (1910).
(26) Steacie, E. and Johnson, F. Proc. Roy. Soc. 112A, 542 (1926).
(27) Simons, J. H. J. phys. Chem. 36, 652 (1933).
REFERENCES 205
(28) Mathewson, C, Spire, E. and Milligan, W. J. Amer. Steel Treat.
Soc. 19, 66 (1931).
(29) Smithells, C. Gases and Metals, Fig. 124.
(30) Rhines, F. and Mathewson, C. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metall.)
Engrs, 111, 337 (1934).
(31) Smithells, C. Gases and Metals, Fig. 123.
(32) Seybold, A. and Mathewson, C. Tech. Publ. Amer. Inst. Min.
Engrs, 642 (1935).
(33) Merica, P. and Waltenburg, R. Bur. Stand. Sci. Pap. 281 (1925).
(34) de Boer, J. H. and Fast, J. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bas, 55, 459
(1936).
(35) Sieverts, A. and Briining, K. Arch. Eisenhiittenw. 7, 641 (1933).
(36) Hagg, G. Z. phys. Chem. 7B, 339 (1930).
(37) Sieverts, A., Zapf, G. and Moritz, H. Z. phys. Chem. 183 A, 33
(1938).
Earlier references are given in Smithells, C, Gases and Metals,
p. 171.
(38) Smithells, C. Gases and Metals, Fig. 119.
(39) Hagg, G. Z.phys. Chem. 4B, 346 (1929).
(40) Rontgen, P. and Braun, H. Metallwirtschaft, 11, 459 (1932).
(41) Sieverts, A. and Krurnbharr, W. Z. phys. Chem. 74, 295 (1910).
(42) Smithells, C. Gases and Metals, Fig. 107.
(43) Kirschfeld, L. and Sieverts, A. Z. Elektrochem. 36, 123 (1930).
(44) Sieverts, A. Z. Metallkunde, 21, 37 (1929).
(45) Toole, F. and Johnson, F. J. phys. Chem. 37, 331 (1933).
(46) Sieverts, A. and Briining, K. Z. phys. Chem. 168, 411 (1934).
(47) Sieverts, A. and Hagen, H. Z. phys. Chem. 174, 247 (1935).
(48) Cf. ref. (35). See also Takei, T. and Murakami, T. Sci. Rep.
Tohoku Univ. 18, 135 (1929).
(49) Smithells, C. Gases and Metals, p. 186, Fig. 132.
(50) Ham, W. J. chem. Phys. 1, 476 (1933).
(51) Post, C. and Ham, W. J. chem. Phys. 5, 915 (1937).
(52) Borelius, G. and Lindblom, S. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 82, 201 (1927).
(53) Barrer, R. Trans. Faraday Soc. 36, 1235 (1940).
(54) Smithells, C. Gases and Metals, p. 84 (1937).
(55) Edwards, C. J. Iron and Steel Inst. 110, 9 (1924).
(56) Johnson, F. and Larose, P. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 46, 1377 (1924).
(57) Lombard, V. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 177, 116 (1923).
(58) Lombard, V., Eichner, C. and Albert, M. Bull. Soc. chim. Paris,
4, 1276 (1937).
(59) Bramley, A. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and Steel Inst., 15, 155
(1926).
(60) Smithells, C. andRansley,C. E. Proc.Roy.Soc. 150A, 172 (1935).
(61) Post, C , and Ham, W. J. chem. Phys. 6, 599 (1938).
(62) Deming, H. and Hendricks, B. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 45, 2857
(1923).
(63) Jouan, R. J . Phys. Radium, 7, 101 (1936).
206 GAS FLOW THROUGH METALS
(64) Melville, H. and Rideal, E. Proc. Roy. Soc. 153A, 89 (1936).
(65) Braaten, E. and Clark, G. Proc. Roy. Soc. 153 A, 504 (1936).
(66) Ryder. Elect. {Cl.) J. 17, 161 (1920)
(67) Smithells, C. and Ransley, C. E. Proc. Roy. Soc. 152A (1935).
(68) Spencer, L. J. chem. Soc. 123, 2124 (1923).
(69) Lombard, V. and Eichner, C. Bull. Soc. chim. Fr. 53, 1176
(1933).
(70) Schmidt, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 13, 747 (1904).
(71) Holt, A. Proc. Roy. Soc. 91 A, 148 (1915).
(72) Lombard, V. and Eichner, C. Bull. Soc. chim. Fr. 51, 1462
(1932).
(73) Ham, W. and Sauter, J . D. Phys. Rev. 47, 337 (1935).
(74) Phys. Rev. 47, 645 (1935).
(75) Wustner, H. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 46, 1095 (1915).
(76) Smithells, C. and Ransley, C.E. Proc. Roy.Soc. 157 A, 292(1936).
(77) Ham, W. Phys. Rev. 47, 645 (1935).
(78) Smithells, C. Gases and Metals, p . 90 (1937).
(79) Barrer, R. M. Trans. Faraday Soc. 35, 628, 644 (1939).
(80) Wang, J . S. Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 32, 657 (1936).
{81) Barrer, R. M. Phil. Mag. 28, 353 (1939).
(82) Phil. Mag. 28, 148 (1939).
(83) Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 159 A, 459 (1932).
(84) Engelhardt, G. and Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 18 B, 369 (1932).
(85) Doehlemann, E. Z. Elektrochem. 42, 561 (1936).
(86) Barrer, R. M. Trans. Faraday Soc. 32, 486 (1936).
(87) Farkas, A. and Farkas, L. Proc. Roy. Soc. 144A, 467 (1934).
(88) Jost, W. and Widmann, A. Z. phys. Chem. 2 9 B , 247 (1935).
(89) Jouan, R. J. Phys. Radium, 7, 101 (1936). See Fig. 4.
(90) Farkas, A. Trans. Faraday Soc. 32, 1667 (1936).
(91) Barrer, R. M. Trans. Faraday Soc. 32, 482 (1936).
<92) Trans. Faraday Soc. 32, 490 (1936).
(93) Cremer, E. and Polanyi, M. Z. phys. Chem. 19 B, 443 (1932).
(94) Melville, H. J. chem. Soc. 1243 (1934).
(95) Eyring, H. and Sherman, J. J. chem. Phys. 1, 345 (1933).
(96) Lombard, V., Eichner, C. and Albert, M, Bull. Soc. chim. Fr.
3, 2203 (1936).
(97). Baukloh, W. and Kayser, H. Z. Metallic. 26,157 (1934); 27, 281
(1935).
(98) Lewkonja, G. and Baukloh, W. Z. Metallic. 25, 309 (1933).
(99) Baukioh, W. and Guthmann, H. Z. Metallic. 28, 34 (1936).
(100) Ham, W. and Rast, W. Trans. Amer. Soc. Metals,26,885(1938).
(101) Poulter, T. and Uffelman, L. Physics, 3, 147 (1932).
(102) Smith, D. and Derge, G. Trans. Amer. electrochem. Soc. 66, 253
(1934).
(103) J. Amer. chem. Soc. 56, 2513 (1934).
(104) Morris, T. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 54, 7 (1935).
{105) Aten, A. and Zieren,M. Rec. Trav.chim.Pays~Bas,49,641 (1930).
CHAPTER V
INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter were considered the main phenomena
of gas flow through metals. It was shown there that the gas
flow (P) is governed by the equation
P--Dd-°
where D is the diffusion constant, but so far we have had little
to say concerning the important constant D. It has, however,
been stated (Chap. IV) that the diffusion constant obeys an
exponential law D = D e~EIRT
analogous to the expression
p = p0e-*y*21
for the permeability constant. It is not difficult to see why
an energy of activation should be involved in diffusion pro-
cesses in solids. The solid lattice contains atoms distributed
in a periodic manner, to give the regular crystalline array.
Just as when the solubility of gases in metals was discussed
(Chap. IV, p. 153), one may regard the interstitial positions in
the lattice as positions of minimum potential energy—potential
"holes"—separated by energy barriers. The diffusing atom
requires an activation energy before it may pass from one
minimum of energy to another, exactly as does an atom under-
going a chemical reaction. In this way an exponential term
e-EiRT i s introduced. While the value of E in a diffusion process
is a relatively easily interpreted quantity, the Ex in the
expression for the permeability is a complex quantity, which
may be made up of E for diffusion processes, and phase-
boundary processes, and the heat of solution (AH) of the gas
in the metal. Thus the energy of activation for diffusion can
208 DIFFUSION OF GASES AND NON-METALS
dt dx\" dxj
However, the mathematical handling of the data in this instance
is now possible (Chap. I), and the formal treatments of Fick's
law for the great proportion of the possibilities which arise
have been completed.
1-0
0-8 \
\
V
v
V
DEPTH IN MM.
10 v
0-9
\
0-8 \V
2°' 7
K0-6
I.
\
oO-5
X
O0'4
V <
0-3
0-2
0*1
\ • * ^ ^
3-92
3-87
14-2
212 D I F F U S I O N OF G A S E S A N D N O N - M E T A L S
-02
¥0 SO tzo 160 200 2*0 280 320
Time in hours
Fig. 76. Flow of hydrogen in a palladium wire followed by measuring
the change of potential with time.
since
or
C0De
t*
04
0-2
0-11
0-5 r 113 IS 2
Fig. 77.
valid for large values of t, but Euringer pointed out that then
changes in P may not be easy to evaluate, since they have
become small. Hevtherefore advocated the method already
indicated.
Van Liempt(25) outlined a method of obtaining D approxi-
mately from the evolution of gases from wires and plates. The
Fick law for diffusion into a semi-infinite sheet is
n 2 f*/2VtfH>
77-=1—r- e~w2dw.
If one plots C/Co against x/2 <J(Dt), the typical curve of Fig. 77
is obtained. The curve encloses the same area CJ^Jn as the
216 DIFFUSION OF GASES AND NON-METALS
a
\
Fig. 78.
so that ~FT — ~3 —
D=
S2t 1-
(iii) Degassing a wire of radius r0, where Q/Qo > 0*67:
L = Z: 3 2_T
218 DIFFUSION OF GASES AND NON-METALS
0-020
.5
0-010
25 50 75
Time (min.)
When kl9 k2 are much greater than Z>, the expression for L
reduces to
where E was 6*3 and 4-9 k.cal. respectively by the two methods.
* These figures are considered doubtful not because of the value of E but of
Do. The value of Do is such that a different mechanism of diffusion would have to
be postulated in the transition state, involving a large disturbance in the
surrounding palladium lattice, and thus a large entropy of activation, or la'rge
Do. If the diffusing particle is a proton this disturbance is most unlikely.
MEASUREMENT OF DIFFUSION CONSTANTS 221
d -5-0
.s
X.
\ V
s
-7-0
* Soft. | Tempered.
222
— 10 — —
* At 1040° C.
DEGASSING OF METALS
-6-0
5
-7-0 -VOwt.%C.-
0-1wt.%C:
-8-0
10 8
H2 (5-7%?
1150 00,(11%) Total 0-27 c.c. in 20 min.
CO (48%)
Ha (41%)
Al(42.43) CO. H2, CH4 Quantities from 2 to 30 c.c./
100 g. reported. Solubility
of gases in aluminium small,
and therefore gases evolved
and retained in pinholes.
Hydrogen occluded as a
result of the action of water
upon aluminium
CU (43) SO2 (60%) Total gas extracted 2 c.c./
CO (20%) 100 g.
H 2 (14%)
228 DIFFUSION OF GASES AND NON-METALS
The nature of the slow uptake of gas has been the cause of
considerable discussion. The general similarity of the pheno-
mena observed for a number of sorption systems is illustrated
in the summarising data of Table 57. In all the cases given, at
least two processes have been established. The initial rapid
process is correctly associated with the van der Waals' ad-
sorption on the surface, and it might be anticipated that
the slow process was the solution of the gas in the metallic
lattice, either forming an alloy (H2) or a compound (N2)
with-the metal. However, the behaviour is not necessarily
DIFFUSION OF GASES IN METALS 231
so easily explained, for not only do some authors describe
two slow processes, but in a large number of studies of
sorption very similar slow processes have been observed
0 200° 400°
Fig. 82. Sorption of hydrogen by Mo-Si catalysts.
where solution is not probable. Among these systems are
the following:
H 2 , D2-Cr203(57,58),
H 2 -Cr 2 0 3 , ZnO(56),
0 2 -CuCr 2 0 4 , ZnCr2O4, CoCr2O4, NiCr2O4, BeCr2O4(59),
H2-MoO3, SiO2(60),
H 2 -C (Charcoal (61), Graphite (62), and Diamond (63)),
CH4-C(6i),
C2H4-Ni(64).
232 DIFFUSION OF GASES AND NON-METALS
v\
O 0-1 ©4 O* O6 K>
CARBON PERCENT.
Fig. 84. The decrease in the diffusion constant of sulphur
in steels as the carbon content increases.
REFERENCES
(1) Bramley, A. and Jinkings, A. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron aiuj Steel
Institute, 15, 17 (1926).
Bramley, A. and Beeby, G. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and
Steel Institute, 15, 71 (1926).
Bramley, A. and Jinkings, A. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and Steel
Institute, 15, 127 (1926).
Bramley, A. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and Steel Institute, 15,
155 (1926).
(2) Bramley, A. and Lawton, G. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and
Steel Institute, 15, 35 (1927).
(3) Bramley, A. and Turner, G. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and
Steel Institute, 17, 23 (1928).
(4) Bramley, A. and Lord, H. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and Steel
Institute, 18, 1 (1929).
(5) Bramley, A., Heywood, F., Cooper, A. and Watts, J. Trans.
Faraday Soc. 31, 707 (1935).
(6) Runge, B. Z. anorg. Chem. 115, 293 (1921).
REFERENCES 237
(7) Hanawalt, J. D. Phys. Rev. 33, 444 (1929).
(8) Linde, J. and Borelius, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 84, 747 (1927).
(9) Kruger, F. and Gehm, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 16, 174 (1933).
(10) Owen, E. A. and Jones, J. Proc. phys. Soc. 49, 587 (1937).
(11) Hagg, G. Z.phys. Chem. 7B, 339(1930).
(12) Z. phys. Chem. 4B, 3.46 (1929).
(13) Meyer, L. Z. phys. Chem. 17B, 385 (1932).
(14) Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 159 A, 459 (1932).
(15) Sieverts, A. and Hagen, H. Z. phys. Chem. 174A, 247 (1935).
(16) Coehn, A. and Jiirgens, H. Z. Phys. 71, 179 (1931).
(17) Dunwald, H. and Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 22B, 212 (1933).
(18) v. Baumbach, H. and Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 24 B, 59 (1934).
(19) de Boer, J. H. and Fast, J. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bos, 55, 459
(1936).
(20) Sieverts, A. and Briining, K. Z. phys. Chem. 174A, 365 (1935).
(21) Coehn, A. and Specht, W. Z. Phys. 62, 1 (1930).
(22) Coehn, A. and Sperling, K. Z. Phys. 83, 291 (1933).
(23) Franzini, T. R.C. 1st. Lombardo, [2] 66, 105 (1933).
(24) Euringer, G. Z. Phys. 96, 37 (1935).
(25) van Liempt, J. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bos, 57, 871 (1938).
(26) Daynes, H. Proc. Roy. Soc. 91 A, 286 (1920).
(27) Barter, R. M. Trans. Faraday Soc. 35, 628 (1939).
(28) Phil. Mag. 28, 148 (1939).
(29) To be published.
(30) Jost, W. and Widmann, A. Z. phys. Chem. 29B, 247 (1935).
(31) Tammann, G. and Schneider, J. Z. anorg. Chem. 172, 43 (1928)-
(32) Duhm, B. Z. Phys. 94, 34 (1935).
(33) Edwards, C. A. J. Iron and Steel Inst. 60, 9 (1924).
(34) Smithells, C. Oases and Metals, p. 173 (1937), Figs. 120, 121.
(35) Tammann, G. and Schonert, K. Stahl u. Eisen, Diisseldorf, 42,
654 (1922).
(36) Calculated by Runge<6) from observations of Giolotti and
co-workers.
(36a) Eilender, W. and Meyer, O. Arch. Eisenhiittenw. 4, 343 (1931).
(366) Wells, C. and Mehl, R. Metals Technol. A.I.M.E. 1940, Tech.
Publ. No. 1180.
(36c) Paschke,M.andHauttmann,A. Arch.EisenhiUt.9,305(1935-6).
(36d) Bramley, A. and Allen, K. Engineering, 11 March 1932.
(37) E.g. Eltzin, I. and Jewlew, A. Phys. Z. Sowjet. 5, 687 (1934).
(38) Norton, A: and Marshall, F. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metaU.)
Engrs, Feb. 1932.
(39) Guillet, L. and Roux, A. Rev. MetaU. 26, 1 (1929).
(40) Rontgen, P. and Moller, H. Metallwirtschaft, 11, 685 (1932).
Burmeister,W. and Schloetter, M. MetaUwirtschaft, 13,115 (1934).
(41) Smithells, C. and Ransley, C. J. Proc. Roy. Soc. 155 A, 195 (1936).
(42) Villachon, A. and Chaudron, G. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 189, 324
(1929).
(43) Hessenbruch, W. Z. Metallic. 21, 46 (1929).
238 DIFFUSION OF GASES AND NON-METALS
(44) Andrews, M. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 54, 1845 (1932).
(45) E.g. Bryce, G. J. chem. Soc. p. 1513 (1936).
(46) Beebe, R., Low, G., Wildner, E. and Goldwasser, S. J. Amer.
chem. Soc. 57, 2527 (1935).
(47) Ward, A. F. Proc. Ray. Soc. 133 A, 506, 522 (1931).
(48) Leypunsky, O. Ada phys.-chim. U.R.S.S. 2, 737 (1935).
(49) Magnus, A. and Sartori, G. Z. phys. Chem. 175A, 329 (1936).
(50) Iijima, S. Sci. Pap. Inst. phya. chem. Res., Tokyo, 23, 164 (1934).
(51) Benton, A. and White, T. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 52, 2325 -(1930).
(52) Harkness, R. and Emmett, P. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 56, 490 (1934).
(53) Morosov, N. M. Trans. Faraday Soc. 31, 659 (1935).
(54) Hammett, P. and Brunauer, S. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 56, 35 (1934).
(55) E.g. Benton, A. and Elgin, J. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 51, 7 (1929).
(56) Pace, J. and Taylor, H. S. J. chem. Phys. 2, 573 (1934).
(57) Taylor, H.S. and Diamond, H. J. Amer. chem. Soc.56,1821 (1934).
(58) Kohlschutter, H. Z. phys. Chem. 170A, 300 (1934).
(59) Frazer, J. and Heard, L. J. phys. Chem. 42, 855 (1938).
(60) Griffith, R. and Hill, S. Proc. Roy. Soc. 148A, 195 (1935).
Hollings, H., Griffith, R. and Bruce, R. Proc. Roy. Soc. 148 A,
186 (1935).
(61) Barrer, R. Proc. Roy. Soc. 149A, 231 (1935).
(62) Trans. Faraday Soc. 32, 481 (1936).
(63) J. chem. Soc. p. 1256 (1936).
(64) Steacie, E. and Stovel, H. J. chem. Phys. 2, 581 (1934).
(65) Taylor, H. S. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 53, 578 (1931).
Trans. Faraday Soc. 28, 131 (1932).
(66) Lennard-Jbnes, J. Trans. Faraday Soc. 28, 333 (1932).
(67) Lewkonja, G. and Baukloh, W. Z. Metallic. 25, 309 (1933).
(68) Baukloh, W. and Guthmann, H. Z. Metallic. 28, 34 (1936).
(69) Ham, W. and Sauter, J. Phys. Rev. 47, 337 (1935).
C H A P T E R VI
D I F F U S I O N OF IONS. IN I O N I C CRYSTALS
AND T H E I N T E R D I F F U S I O N OF METALS
4 Be 10 lOy. (-)
9F 17, 18, 20 l-2m., 108m., 9s. (+M+M-)
11 Na 22,24 3y., 15h.
14 Si 27,31 6-6m., 2-5h. (+M-)
15 P 30,32 3m., 14-5d.
16 S 31,35 26m., 80d. (+)»(~)
18 A 41 110m. (~)
19 K 38, 42 7-5m., 12-5h.
20 Ca 39,45 4-5 m., 2-3 h. (+)»(-) en
21 Sc 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 48 53m., 4-lh., 4-0h., 52h., 90d., 41h. M
23 V 48, 49, 50, 52 16d., 32m., 3-6h., 3-8m. o
25 Mn ?, 56, ?, ? 46m., 2-5h., 21m., 5d., 7mth.
26 Fe 55,59 8-9m., 40d.
27 Co 55, ?, 58, 60 18h., 150d., l l m . ~ l y . ( + ) , ( + and - ) , ( + ) , ( - )
28 Ni 63 120m. ( ~)
29 Cu 61, 62, 64, 66 3-3h., 10-5m., 12-5h., 5m. ( + ) , ( + ) , ( + and - W - ) O
30 Zn 63,65 38m., 60m.
31 Ga 66, 68, 70, 72 9-4h., 60m., 20m., 23h. d
32 Ge 75, ? 20h., 30m. 03
33 As 76,78 26h., 65m.
34 Se 79 or 81, 83 lh., 17m.
35 Br 76, 80, 80, S2, 83 6-3m., 18m., 4-5h., 34h., 2-5h. ( + ) . ( ~ )> ( ~ ) » ( ~ )>(*")
36 Kr v 74m., 4-5h., 18h, (-),(-),(?)
37 Rb 86,88 18m., 18d. ( _^ (_j
38 Sr 89 3h., 55 d.
39 Y 90 70 h.
40 Zr 97 44h. (-)
42 Mo ? 2*5m., 17m., 36h.
44 Ru ? 40s., 100s., l l h . , 170h. (_)>(_)>(_)>(_)
46 Pd 60h., 15m., 12h., 3m.
47 Ag i06,106,108,110, 111, 24-5m., 8*2d., 2*3m., 22s., 7-5d., 8-2h.
112 *
48 Cd ?, 115, 117 33m., 4-3h., 58h. (+)»(~) (~)
49 In 111,112,114,114,116, 20m., 72s., 4 1 h., 50d., 13s., 54m., (+).(-)•(-).(-)•(-).(-).(-)
lift 117
11O, 1 1 1 2*3 h
51 Sb X20,122, 124 16m., 2*5d., 60d. (+),(-),(-)
52 Te ? llh. (~)
55 Cs 134 l*5h. (~~)
56 Ba ?, 139 2-5m., 80m ^ (?), (?)
57 La 140 l-3d.
59 Pr 140,142 3m., 19h. (+)»(—)
60 to 71 (other — In nearly every case half-life periods —
rare earths) of suitable length
79
i £t "Rf
ni 181 JIJUI
81 Tl 204,206 5 m., 97 m. ( - ) , ( — )
82 Pb 209 3h. ( - )
* In the table, m. = minute, h. =hour, d. =day, mth. = month, y. =year. Also ( - ) denotes electron and ( + ) denotes positron.
244 INTERDIFFUSION OF SOLIDS
o
*fe 40 1
t 30
i it 20 24 28 X F 40 44~ 48
Distance in inchesx 10'*
Fig. 86. Diffusion of chromium into iron (Hicks(4i>).
Gradient after 96 hours at 1200° C.
higher the oxygen pressure the less the zinc ion excess, and so
the smaller the conductivity. Cadmium oxide (51) behaves in
a similar manner.
Other oxides give systems with an oxygen excess (oxides of
iron, cuprous oxide, and nickel oxide(52)). Cuprous oxide, for
example, takes up an excess of oxygen as 0 " ions, as a result
of which vacant cation sites appear in the lattice. The electrons
for this process are liberated by the reaction Cu+ -> Cu++ + e,
and electronic conductivity occurs because electrons may be
supplied by the electron transfer of the above reaction. The
higher the oxygen pressure the more excess oxygen is dissolved
in the lattice (e.g. - 0 - 1 % at 1000° C. and at 30mm.Hg
pressure), and so the higher the conductivity. The sizes of the
ions (O" = 1*32 A.; Cu+ = 0-96 A.)do not allow one to arrange
the excess oxygen interstitially, and so the type of disorder
given in Fig. 89(48) is postulated. X-ray studies (53) of ferrous
oxide, sulphide, and selenide showed that empty 'cation posi-
tions similar to those in Fig. 89 may indeed exist.
The alkali halides in general (55) can behave as solvents for small
amounts of halogens, alkali metals, and even hydrogen. The
solute is not always in atomic or ionic form however (Chap. Ill).
251
because (e)g and (O—)g are nearly constant. But (Cu+), = (e),,
and so . . rrr -,•
fOOO'C.
*900°C.
+02
-01
* "2" denotes "zwischengitter" or "interstitial"; "J" (see p. 251) denotes vtleerstelle", "vacant site", or "electron defect site*'.
254 INTERDIFFTJSION OF SOLIDS
JS0 a
where a denotes the lattice parameter, and e is the electronic
charge. In addition, the polarisation energy involvedis approxi-
mately equal to that when an ion is transferred from a. medium
* The repulsive exponent n is usually given a value of 9-13.
THE ENERGY OF DISORDER IN CRYSTALS 255
of dielectric constant e to a medium of dielectric constant
unity, given for a pair of ions by
No a \ e)
Accordingly, the net energy of disorder per ion pair becomes
j\o a \ n] a
which is very much smaller than the lattice energy. However,
it must be remembered that many approximations are involved
in so simple a calculation as that above. The nature of these
approximations is now indicated:
(1) The force law used in calculating the lattice energy is
inadequate since it neglects contributions of van der Waals'
interactions, which may become appreciable in lattices where
the mass of the ions is large, or where one type of ion exists
largely in interstitial positions. Thus in a-Agl, or a-Ag2S, where
the cations are in almost complete disorder in an anion lattice,
van der Waals' forces are considerable.
(2) Interactions between induced quadrupoles also con-
tribute to the polarisation energy.
(3) When a vacant site is formed, surrounding ions will tend
to rearrange themselves slightly, and the corresponding energy
term must be allowed for.
(4) A better method of expressing the repulsive potential
replaces the term
B
E -
(r+4-r.-r)
by #reP. -be P ,
where r+ and r_ are the radii of a positive and a negative ion,
distant r from each other, and b and p are constants. Even this
equation is inaccurate at very small separations.
256 INTERDIFFTJSION OF SOLIDS
* The concentrations are calculated assuming that the mobility of holes and
interstitial ions is the same. This assumption may lead to errors in the data
of Table 61.
If the ions displaced from their regular lattice sites are small
compared with the interstices, they may more easily exist in
interstitial positions, and Frenkel's disorder is possible. If the
anions and cations are of comparable radii, the lattice must be
highly distorted for ions to exist interstitially, and Schottky's
disorder becomes probable.
17
258 INTERDIFFUSION OF SOLIDS
$///
-e
Fig. 93. The diffusion and conductivity data for lead iodide (Seith(39>).
#pbi, = conductivity of Pbl 2 .
Ky = conductivity of I' ions.
J£pb++ = conductivity of Pb" ions.
Dpb++ = self-diffusion constant of Pb" ions.
1
aCuA Melt
0 •ssl
j
-1
""
-2 "/
-3 y
$ /
'2 rCol 'r
/
-6
/
W ZOO* 300' SOFC.
, 94. The conductivity of cuprous bromide as a function of
temperature (Tubandt<39)).
INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE 261
Where one has a pair of mutually soluble salts the behaviour
tends to be that of group (B). For example, in Table 62 (39) are
given the constants for the conductivity of CuBr-AgBr mixed
crystals. The conductivity may be represented by
K = KCu+ + KAg+ = ACn+ e - W + AAg+ e-
10*
Agl-
zo 18 f6
a-Agl
r
u s •4
1
Y
!
? 2i t 2
Composition
mol. % AgBr cal./ion Aca+ cal./ion
Pbci2+o.oosm
15 2.0 PJ 3
103/T(Tin°K.)
Fig. 96. The influence of potassium chloride on the conductivity
of lead chloride (6yulai(63>).
K (at the
Melting- melting- A E E
Salt point point) ohm"1 cm."1 cal./ion e.V.
1 1
ohm" cm."
LiF 842 0-6 x lO"2 4 xlO 77 51,000 L. 2-20
LiCl 606 1-5 x 10-* 5 xlO 38,000 L. 1-65
NaF 992 1-7 x lO"33 1-5 x 106 52,000 L. 2-25
fcaCl 800 1-3 x 10" 1 xlO«6 44,000 L. 1-90
NaBr 735 1-3 x 10- 33 1 xlO 41,200 L. 1-78
Nal 661 4 0 x lO" 1-5 x 10» 33,000 L. 1-42
KF 846 8 0 x 10-* 3 xlO 78 54,400 L. 2-35
KCl 768 2-0 x 10-* 2 xlO 47,800 L. 206
KBr 728 2 0 x 10-* 1-5 x 10« 45,600 L. 1-97
KI 680 1-5 x 10-* 3 xlO 5 41,000 L. 1-77
RbCl 717 5 0 x lO"55 3 xlO« 49,200 L. 212
RbBr 681 3-5 x 10~ 1-8 xlO 6 47,000 L. 203
TICi 427 5 0 x lO"3 2-5 x 103 18,320 L. 0-79
TlBr 457 5 0 x 10- 3 1-7 x 103 18,560 L. 0-80
AgCl 455 1 0 x 10"1 3 xlO« 22,200 T. 0-96
AgBr 422 6 0 x 10"1 3 xlO« 20,600 T. 0-89
a-Agl 522 25 5-5 1,186 T. 005
Ag2HgI4 4 xlO 2 8,600 K. 0-37
PbCl2 501 5 x 10- 3 6-6 10,960 S. 0-47
Pbl 2 402 3 x 10- 5 1-2 x 105 30,000 S. 1-30
9-8 x 10-* 9,360 S. 0-40
(I")
1 *%
K
22
\
2-0
\
s,
\
N I
\
F 0/* \
H
t6• f8
n o W 2-2
Radius of the anion in A.
Fig. 97. Dependence of the energy E in the conductivity equation
K = Ae'EIRT upon the anion radius (Lehfeldt<«6)).
If the values of E are equal, the current carrier is the ion used
as the indicator. An example of this method has been given
elsewhere for lead iodide and lead chloride (p. 271).
The second method is the measurement of the transport
number, for which the experimental technique was de-
veloped by Tubandt and his co-workers (39). It was early
discovered (67,68) that Faraday's laws were valid for the salts
barium chloride and silver chloride, and thus that the current
carriers are ions. Tubandt and his school carried these in-
vestigations much further by pressing salt cylinders together
between metal electrodes and electrolysing the system. By
weighing the cylinders and electrodes before and after electro-
lysis the amounts of material transported were estimated
directly. However, it was shown that in many instances
threads of metal formed stretching from anode to cathode, so
that conduction soon became metallic. a-Agl did not behave
in this manner, and it was sufficient to coat the electrodes with
a protective layer of this salt to suppress the formation of
metal threads. With a cell arranged as below:
Pt / a-Agl / Ag2S / Ag2S / Ag2S / Ag,
it was possible to measure the total current, the weight of silver
deposited at the cathode, the weight of silver dissolved from
the anode, and the loss or gain of weight of any intermediate
silver sulphide cylinder. In this way it was found that the
transport number of silver was unity. Nevertheless the result
does not mean that Ag2S is a pure cationic conductor, but
only that any electrons in the silver sulphide lattice do not
enter the silver iodide lattice. At the Ag2S/AgI boundary
both Ag+ ions and electrons are liberated and removed, with
formation of excess sulphur :
The Ag+ ions move to the cathode, while the electrons move
to the anode. Therefore in the Agl phase all the current is
carried by Ag+ ions, and the transport number measured by
deposition of silver at the cathode is unity. The excess sulphur
liberated at the phase boundary Ag2S/AgI eventually reacts
IDENTITY OF CURRENT-CARRYING IONS 267
with silver from the anode. Other examples of Tubandt's
method do, however, speak unequivocally for cationic or
anionic conductivity, especially if used in conjunction with
a supplementary method such as that described in the next
paragraph. The example of a-Ag2S serves to indicate the
type of difficulty encountered.
Finally, should the conductivity be sensitive to the pressure
in a surrounding gas atmosphere of a component of the crystal,
the investigations of Wagner and his school (51,52,43) have
suggested that part of the conduction may be electronic
(p. 251).
By the application of these methods the current-carry-
ing ions have been identified in the instances given below.
Inspection of these examples shows that in salts with ions of
too
[60 /
/
J
.sW
20 /
D __
D _2> *
^o
»-¥'
is only approximate. Tubandt, Reinhold and Jost (78) used the
relation.
Noh
where d is the lattice constant, E the activation energy for
diffusion, and h is Planck's constant. The empirical nature of
this equation is stressed elsewhere (p. 299), but its applicability
in many cases is outstanding. In Tables 66 and 67 in the last
column are given the values of E calculated from D and d.
The point to be noted here is that for the salts of group I I of
Table 66 the equation does not hold (Smekal(62>), but that as
a rule when the activation energy is large the equation is
satisfactory.
Those diffusion systems which have been marked with an
asterisk in Table 67 represent metal pairs which form a con-
tinuous series of mixed crystals. As a rule in such systems
the value of Do is small, an important exception being self-
diffusion processes (Pb in Pb:D 0 = 5-1 cm.2 sec."1; Au in
Au:D 0 = 1-26 x 102cm.2sec.~1). The normal range of values
of Do lies between 10"1 and lO^cm^sec." 1 . There are ex-
ceptions, however; for example, the diffusions of silicon and
tin into copper give Do = 1-0 x 104 and 6-7 x 10s cm.8 sec.-1.
Do for the self-diffusion of bismuth, in a direction perpen-
dicular to the c-axis, reaches a value of (1-33—16-3) x 1045. It
is difficult to assess the reproducibility of some of the data,
since some., of the diffusion processes listed are structure
sensitive, but those for bismuth appear reasonably con-
sistent (see Fig. 100). It is to be noted that the higher the
BD 18
274 INTERDIFFUSION OF SOLIDS
activation energy the larger ihe factor Do, although there is
no simple relationship between them, and exceptions also
occur. Some of these exceptions are, however, for structure-
sensitive diffusions (Th-W, Mo-W) where diffusion does not
occur solely through the lattice. Here the number of channels
available for diffusion may*be restricted to grain boundaries,
and " slow " reactions of chemical kinetics. In the former case
the kinetic theory suggests accumulation of energy through
many degrees of freedom, a Viewpoint corresponding with
a large disturbance of the lattice. A tentative explanation
of the influence of chemical and physical similarity ^)f
solute and solvent upon the diffusion is advanced on
p. 285.
It is also noteworthy that on the whole the activation energy
for diffusion and for conductivity (Table 64) in ionic lattices
is smaller than the activation energy for diffusion in metallic
lattices. It is probable that this difference may be traced to
the greater influence of polarisation forces in the case of salts,
and to the greater density and so closer atomic packing in
the case of many metals.
DIFFUSION ANISOTROPY
,^»—°""
-5 s
.—-—' 2*—-
-6
~" 36.-£*
*5 - "
-7
3a yy
-ff
21 20 19 18 17 16 15
t/Tx /0+ (Tin'K.)—**
Fig. 99. Diffusion anisotropy in lead iodide.
concludes that the iodide ion carries most of the current normal
to the c-axis, but the lead ion carries most of the current
parallel to it. The anisotropy is several powers of ten at low
temperatures, but is naturally temperature dependent, and
seems to vary somewhat for different specimens. The curves
3a and 36 are plotted from the two terms of Seith's equation (32)
given in this paragraph For the self-diffusion of lead ions
in lead iodide the following diffusion constants were obtained
(Table 68).
The table shows that diffusion anisotropy for lead ions may
exist, but is slight compared with the anisotropy of the iodide
ion. Like heulandite, lead iodide is a layer lattice, and it is
the layer structure which is responsible for its behaviour in
diffusion.
Both Warburg and Tegetmeier(io4) and Joffe(i05) observed
278 INTEBDIFFTJSION OF SOLIDS
1
ample of diffusion anisotropy is
provided by bismuth (96). Self-
diffusion parallel and perpendi- -7
cular to the c-axis, using ThC as
radioactive indicator, gave an t . .
anisotropy of up to 106-fold
(Fig. 100). The figure shows
-9
1
that parallel to the c-axis the
1
activation energy for diffusion is
30 k.cal., but that perpendicular ll
to it the activation energy is
/
137,000 cal.
Another study of the same
type (106) was made of the dif-
fusion of mercury into single
12
21 20
I" 19
i/Tx to f(Tin °K.) *
18
Al
60
;z
80 H» fO 40 60 SO 100
CONC. IN ATOMIC PERCENT AU
in the alloy (Fig. 103) and rose at first slowly and then rapidly
with increasing amounts of the solute. I t is made apparent
from these data that the diffusion constant is generally con-
centration-dependent, and that the application of the normal
Fick equation to metal-metal systems can yield only an average
value of Z>, and may therefore lead to errors in evaluating Do
and E in D = Doe~B/RT. Many more diffusion studies, using the
Matano method, are essential before the relationships between
Do and E can be put upon a quantitative basis.
From measurements of D which have been derived by the
Matano treatment of the law -=- — -—-\D-^~\, trends in the
ct ox\ ox)
TABLE 69. The diffusion of metals in copper
Zn from base Zn from base Al from base Si from base Sn from base Q
Metal composition 13-6% alloy 29-6% alloy 17-8% alloy 10-85% alloy 5-6% alloy
0% 4 % 10% 0% 4% 0% 4% 16% 0% 4% 8% O
10% 0% 4 % 5%
Zn Zn Zn Zn Zn Zn Al Al Al Si Si Si Sn Sn Sn Q
D x 10"10 cm.2 sec."1 at 750° C. 1-4 1-5 3-2 31 3-6 5-6 1-6 1-7 10-8 20 2-8 8-6 21 22-2 33-5 O
Activation energy, E — 34,100 — — 31,400 — — 40,400 — — 64,200 — — 56,000 —
Crystal habit of solute C.p.h. — — C.p.h. F.c.c. — — Diam. — — Tetrag. — —
Solid solubility at the peritectic 32 32 16 11 75
temperature in atomic %
Atomic radii (Gfoldschmidt) in A. 1-374 1-374 1*40 — 1-582
Melting-point of solute ° C. 419-4 419-4 660 1420 231-9
t9
GO
60
REVISED D AT 800 °C
ALUMINUM AND COPPER •••
50
BERYLLIUM AND COPPER*
CADMIUM AND COPPER — (EXTRAPOLATED*
SILICON AND COPPER^"
40
TIN AND COPPER
8 10 12 14 16 IS
CONCENTRATION IN ATOM PER CENT
60000
50000
40000
30000
6 8 10 12 14 18
CONCENTRATION IN ATOM PER CENT
Fig. 104. Relationship between E and the concentration for the Bystems
Cu-Al, Cu-Be, Cu-Si, Cu-Sn, Cu-Zn (Rhines and Mehl 08)).
INFLUENCE OF CONCENTRATION 283
activation energy for diffusion may also be obtained. These
trends (Fig. 104) in E with concentration are usually initially
slight, but may become large and rapid at higher concen-
trations. The data of Mehl(92) for the system Al-Cu follow an
approximate relation E = EQ[l + const, x (cone, of Al)2]. The
values of the energy of activation for the diffusion process can
be seen in Fig. 104(98) both to increase and to decrease with
increasing concentration of the alloying material. In some
instances, therefore, the solute is more easily loosened in the
lattice by the alloying process, in others the converse is true.
O
TABLE 71. Diffusion of metals in silver
O
Metal Sb Sn In Cd Au Pd
/•*
)LIDS
D cm.2 sec."1 at 760° C. 1-4 x 10- 9
2-3 x 10-* 1-2 x 10"» 9-5 x 10- 10
3-6 x 10- 10 2-4 x 10- 10
Activation energy 21,700 21,400 24,400 22,350 26,600 20,200
Crystal habit of solute Rhombic Tetrag F.c, tetrag. C.p.h. F.c.c F.c.c.
Maximum solubility of 5 12 19 42 100 100
solute in atomic %
Atomic radii (A.) after Gold- 1-614 1-582 1-569 1-521 1-438 1-372
schmidt
Melting-point of solute ° C. 630 231-9 155 320-9 1063 1555
FACTORS INFLUENCING DIFFUSION CONSTANTS 285
D cm.2 sec."1 M6xlO-9 1-6 x lO"8 11 x 10-» 5 0 x 10~» 0-34 x 10- 10 0-22 x lO"10 1 0 x 10- 10 0-16 x 10- 10 0-77 x lO"10 CO
at 900° C. Nirich Pd rich Ptrich M
6 0 x 10- 10 2-3 x 10- 10 0-61 x lO"10 o
Au rich Au rich Au rich
Activation , 29,800 26,600 20,200 — — — 37,400 — 39,000
energy
Atomic radii 1-438 1-244 1-372 1-385 CO
(A.)afterGold- O
schmidt
Melting-point, 1063 1452 1555 1755 —
°C.
FACTORS INFLUENCING DIFFUSION CONSTANTS 287
gold, and some B subgroup metals with atomic radii not very
favourable for solid solution, and with which valence effects
occur also to a certain extent, one obtains numerous alloy
phases. The metals of group 8, on the other hand, have atomic
FACTORS INFLUENCING DIFFUSION CONSTANTS 289
Fig. 107. The relative mobilities of silver ions in various silver compounds,
arranged around a parabola. On the right is the relative electronic con-
tribution to conductivity.
ooooo ooooo
ooooo oo o oo
OOOOO OO ® x OO
ooooo oo * @ oo
ooooo oo o oo
ooooo ooooo
Undisturbed lattice Lattice momentarily loosened to
permit place exchange of
molecules A and B
Fig. 108. A place exchange process as pictured in a crystal lattice.
O
• b •
2
In this equation \dv = eScm^/day- 1 , when d = 3A., and
v = 5x 104cm./sec. The case of forced diffusion (electrical
conductivity) may be obtained by using the Einstein equation:
D =; BUT (B denotes the mobility)
and also K = N(Ze)*B,
* For Schottky disorder the analogous relationship is n=a.Ne~~Bo!R1. The
exponential does not contain the factor J, and a may have values as high as 10*.
CONDUCTIVITY AND DIFFUSION PROCESSES 295
K=
x+ d
Fig. 110.
Thus
D = %d2vQe~EIRT (kinetic theory deduction),
W
D = d2 ^r~h e-E/RT (Langmuir-Dushman empirical ex-
0
pression),
so that if there were any correspondence E/Noh = %v0; but
since v = E/Noh9 and as E can be even greater than
90,000 cal./mol., v0 must if derived from the Langmuir-
Dushman expression correspond in such a case to an energy
of 540,000 cal. Clearly no physical significance can then be
attributed to the term E/Noh in the Langmuir-Dushman
expression. When not one but two degrees of freedom are in-
cluded for the storing of the activation energy, the rate R at
which the ions are activated becomes
E
with D = \c
which is Bradley's expression (121). When n degrees of freedom
300 INTERDIFFUSION OF SOLIDS
r
-9
to
26 25 21 23 22 21 20 79 70 77
l/T x 10*.
(1) Experimentally found curve, ,#=27,900 cal./atom.
• Calculated using d—shortest distance between Pb atoms,
(2) and E=25,500 cal./atom.
Calculated using d = -y/3 x shortest distance between Pb
(3) atoms, and #=26,700 cal./atom.
E
Fig. 111. Self-diffusion in Pb calculated from D =-WT d2e~EIRT calculated from
a single experimental diffusion constant and the distance between neigh-
bouring atoms (d).
The formulae of Braune (94) and of van Liempt (109) recognise
the dependence of the velocity of diffusion upon the melting-
point by introducing in the exponential term the equality
E T E
T OT B
wherein Tm is the melting-point. In these equations the
constant b depends upon the atomic size, and polarisation
properties of the lattice. The usual value of 62 is about 2, and
for lattices of very different melting-points such as lead, silver,
302 INTERDIFFUSION OF SOLIDS
In this expression
a = the probability that a system having once crossed the
top of the energy barrier will not recross it in the reverse
direction before losing its activation energy.
Pb 327 2-2 x 1 0 - 1 5
961 9-6 x lO" 20
& 3400 4-3 x lO" 59
dx ° dx
where No is Avogadro's number. Finally*,
F*JcT
D = dW = d2oc^^
w
Noh "~h Fn' Fn BT272-
For the self-diffusion of lead at 230° C, this relationship
becomes IT*
"X *10-
F*
There is so far no analysis of factors determining the ratio -—•
for' diffusion by place exchange or other mechanisms. In
some instances, the considerations of the footnote below may
have to be allowed for.
Eyring and Wynne-Jones (99) have extended Eyring's equa-
tion for the diffusion constant by introducing the entropy
of activation AS*1, and the heat of activation AH*. The
diffusion constant is now given by
REFERENCES
(1) Spring, W. Z. phys. Chem. 15, 65 (1894).
(2) Roberts-Austen, W. Philos. Trans. 187 A, p. 393 (1896).
(3) Faraday, M. and Stodart. Quart. J. Sci. 9, 319 (1820). Experi-
mental Researches in Chemistry, p. 57 (1859).
(4) Masing, G. Z. anorg. Chem. 62, 265 (1909).
(5) Masing, G. and Overlach, H. Wiss. Veroff. Siemens-Konz. 9,
ii, 331 (1930).
(6) Diergarten, H. Metal Progress, p. 64, Jan. 1936.
(7) Mehl, R. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metall.) Engrs, 122, 11
(1936).
(8) Arnold, J. and M'William, A. J. Iron and Steel Inst. 56, 85
(1899).
(9) Giolotti, F. and Tavanti, G. Gazz. chim. ital. 39, H, 386 (1909).
(10) Rawdon, H. Protective Metal Coatings, New York, Chem. Cat.
Co. (1928).
(11) Grimshaw, L. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metall.) Engrs, 120, 363
(1936).
(12) Faraday, M. Philos. Trans. 23, 507 (1833).
(13) Wiedmann, E. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 154, 318 (1875).
(14) Kohlrausch, W. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 17, 642 (1882).
(15) Thomson, S. P. Nature, Lond., 24, 469 (1881).
(16) Beetz, W. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 92, 452 (1854).
(17) Reynolds, O. Diss. Gottingen, 1902.
(18) Nernst, W. Z. Elektrochem. 6, 41 (1899).
(19) Bose, E. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 9, 164 (1902).
(20) Graetz, L. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 29, 314 (1886).
(21) Arrhenius, S. S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 96, 831 (1887).
(22) Dunn, J. J. chem. Soc. 129, 2973 (1926); J. Soc. Chem. Ind..
Lond., 46, 109(1927).
(23) Bramley, A. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and Steel Inst., 15,
155 (1926).
Bramley, A. and Beeby, G. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and
Steel Inst., 15, 71 (1926).
Bramley, A. and Jinkings, A. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and
Steel Inst., 15, 17, 127 (1926).
Bramley, A. and Lawton, G. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and
Steel Inst., 16, 35 (1927).
Bramley, A. and Heywood, F. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and
Steel Inst., 17, 67 (1928).
Bramley, A. and Turner, G. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and
Steel Inst., 17, 23 (1928).
Bramley, A. and Lord, H. Carnegie Schol. Mem., Iron and Steel
Inst., 18, 1 (1929).
Bramley, A., Heywood, F., Cooper, A. and Watts, J. Trans.
Faraday Socf 31, 707 (1935).
REFERENCES 307
(24) Brower, T., Larsen, B. and Shenk, W. Trans. Amer. Inst. min.
(metall.) Engrs, 113, 61 (1934).
(25) Van Arkel, A. Metallwirtschaft, 7, 656 (1928).
(26) Bruni, G. and Meneghini, D. Int. Zeit. Metallog. 2, 26
(1912).
(27) Tanaka, S. and Matano, C. Mem. CoU. Sci. Kyoto, 14A, 59
(1931).
(28) Linde, J. and Borelius, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 84, 747 (1927).
Kruger, F. and Gehm, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 16, 174 (1933).
29) Seith, W. and Peretti, E. Z. Elektrochem. 42, 570 (1936).
(30) Brick, M. and Philips, A. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metall.)
Engrs, 124, 331 (1937).
(31) v. Hevesy, G. Trans. Faraday. Soc. 34, 841 (1938).
v. Hevesy, G. and Paneth, F. Z. anorg. Chem. 82, 323 (1913).
Groh, J. and v. Hevesy, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 63, 85 (1920).
v. Hevesy, G. and Obrutscheva, A. Nature, Lond., 115, 674
(1925).
(32) v. Hevesy, G. and Seith, W. Z. Phys. 56, 790 (1929).
Z. Phys. 57, 869 (1929).
v. Hevesy, G., Seith, W. and Keil, A. Z. Phys. 79, 197 (1932).
(33) McKay, H. Trans. Faraday Soc. 34, 845 (1938).
(33a) Steigman, J., Shockley, W. and Nix, F. Phys. Rev. 56, 13
(1939).
(34) v. Hevesy, G. and Paneth, F. Manual of Radioactivity, Oxford,
1938.
(35) Langmuir, I. J. Franklin Inst. 217, 543 (1934).
(36) Bosworth, R. C. Proc. Roy. Soc. 150 A, 58 (1935).
(37) Proc. Gamb. Phil. Soc. 34, 262 (1938).
(38) Cichocki, J. Ann. de Physique, 20, 478 (1933).
(39) Tubandt, C. Z. Elektrochem. 39, 500 (1933).
Tubandt, C, Eggert, S. and Schibbe, G. Z. anorg. Chem. 1, 117
(1921).
Seith, W. Z. Elektrochem. 42, 635 (1936).
Tubandt, C, Reinhold, H. and Liebold, G. Z. anorg. Chem. 197,
225(1931).
(40) Grube, G. and Jedele, A. Z. Elektrochem. 38, 799 (1932).
(41) Hicks, L. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metall.) Engrs, 113, 163
(1934).
(42) Renninger, M. Z. Kristallogr. 89, 344 (1934).
(43) Wagner, C. and Schottky, W. Z. phys. Chem. 11B, 163 (1930).
Wagner, C. Z.phys. Chem.p. 177 (1931) (BodensteinFestband).
Z. phys. Chem. 22 B, 181 (1933).
(44) Jost, W. J. chem. Phys. 1, 466 (1933); Z. phys. Chem, 169 A, 129
(1934).
(45) Schottky, W. Z. phys. Chem. 29B, 335 (1935).
(46) v. Hevesy, G. Handbuchder Phys. 13, 286 (1928); Z. Elektro-
chem. 39, 490 (1933).
308 INTERDIFFUSION OF SOLIDS
(47) Frenkel, J. Z. Phys. 35, 652 (1926).
(48) Wagner, C. Trans. Faraday Soc. 34, 851 (1938).
(49) Strock, L. Z. phys. Chem. 25B, 441 (1934); 31B, 132 (1935).
Rahlfs, P. Z.phys. Chem. 31B, 157 (1935).
(50) Ketelaar, J. Z. phys. Chem. 26B, 327 (1934); 30, 53 (1935);
Z. KristaUogr. 87, 436 (1934).
(51) Baumbach, H. and Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 22B, 199
(1933).
(52) Dunwald, H. and Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 22B, 212 (1933).
(53) Jette, G. and Foote, F. J. chem. Phys. 1, 29 (1933).
Hagg, G. and Sucksdorff, J. Z. phys. Chem. 22B, 444 (1933).
Hagg, G. and Kindstrom, A. L. Z. phys. Chem. 22 B, 453
(1933).
(54) Seith, W. Z. Elektrochem. 42, 635 (1936).
(55) Hilsch, R. and Pohl, R. W. Z. Phys. 108, 55 (1937).
Z. Phys. 57, 145 (1929); 59, 812 (1930).
Rogener, H. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 29, 387 (1937).
Mollwo, E. Ann. Phys., Lpz.9 29, 394 (1937).
Hilsch, R. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 29, 407 (1937).
(56) Jost, W. Trans. Faraday Soc. 34, 861 (1938).
Diffusion ii. Chem. Reakt. imfesten Stoffen, Dresden (1937).
Jost, W. and Nehlep, G. Z. phys. Chem. 32 B, 1 (1936).
(57) Koch, E. and Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 38B, 295 (1937).
(58) Foussereau. Ann. Chim. (Phys.), 5, 241, 317 (1885).
(59) Rasch, E. and Hinrichsen, F. Z. Elektrochem. 14, 41 (1908).
(60) Konigsberger, J. Phys. Z. 8, 883 (1907).
(61) Phipps, T., Lansing, W. and Cooke, T. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 48,
112 (1926).
(62) Smekal, A. Handbuch der Phys. 24, ii, 880 (1933).
(63) Gyulai, Z. Z. Phys. 67, 812 (1931).
Jost, W. Diffusion ii. Chem. Reakt. im festen Stoffen, p. 130,
Dresden (1937).
(64) Tubandt, C, Eggert, S. and Schibbe, G. Z. anorg. Chem. 117,1
(1921).
Klaiber, F. Ann. Phys., Lpz., (5), 3, 229 (1929).
Baedeker, K. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 22, 749 (1907).
Tubandt, C. and Reinhold, H. Z. phys. Chem., Bedenstein.
Festband, p. 874 (1931).
Jost, W. Z. phys. Chem. 16 B, 129 (1932).
(65) Tubandt, C. and Reinhold, H. Z. Elektrochem. 37, 589 (1931).
Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 21B, 42 (1933).
(66) Lehfeldt, W. Z. Phys. 85, 717 (1933).
(67) Haber, F. and Tolloczko, St. Z. anorg. Chem. 41, 407 (1904).
(68) Bruni, G. and Scarpa, G. R.C. Accad. Lincei, 22, 438 (1913).
(69) Coehn, A. and Sperling, K. Z. Phys'. 83, 291 (1933).
Coehn, A. and Specht, W. Z. Phys. 62, 1 (1930).
(70) Seith, W. and Kubaschewski, O. Z. Elektrochem. 41, 551 (1935).
REFERENCES 309
(71) Seith, W. and Etzold, H. Z. Elektrochem. 40, 829 (1934).
(72) Jost, W. Z. angew. Chem. 45, 544 (1932).
Jost, W. and Linke, R. Z. phys. Chem. 29 B, 127 (1935).
(73) Nehlep,G., Jost, W. and Linke, £ . Z. Elektrochem. 42,150 (1936).
(74) Nernst, W. Z. phys. Chem. 2, 613 (1888).
(75) Einstein, A. Ann. Phys., Lpz., (4), 17, 549 (1905).
(76) v. Hevesy, G. S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 129, 549 (1920); Z.phys.
Chem. 127, 401 (1927).
(77) Braune, H. Z. Elektrochem. 31, 576 (1925).
(78) Tubandt, C, Reinhold, H. and Jost, W. Z. anorg. Chem. 177,253
(1928); Z. phys. Chem. 129 A, 69 (1927).
(79) Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 11B, 139 (1931).
(80) Jost, W. Diffusion u. Chem. Reaht. im festen Stoffen, p. 132,
Dresden (1937).
(81) Braune, H. and Kahn, O. Z. phys. Chem. Ill A, 270 (1924).
(82) v. Hevesy, G. and Seith, W. Z. Elektrochem. 37, 528 (1931).
(83) Seith, W. and Keil, A. Z. phys. Chem. 22B, 350 (1933).
(84) Seith, W., Hofer, E. and Etzold, H. Z. Elektrochem. 40, 322
(1934).
(85) Mehl, R. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metall.) Engrs, 122, 21
(1936), collected from various sources.
(86) Matano, C. Jap.J. Phys. 9, 41 (1934).
(87) Jost, W. Z. phys. Chem. 21B, 158 (1933).
(88) Fonda, G., Young, A. and Walker, A. Physics, 4, 1 (1933).
(89) Dushman, S., Dennison, D. and Reynolds, N. Phys. Rev. 29
903 (1927).
(90) van Liempt, J. A. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bas, 51, 114 (1932).
(91) Paschke, M. and Hauttmann, A. Arch. Eisenhiittenw. 9, 305
(1935).
(92) Mehl, R. F. J. appl. Phys. 8, 174 (1937).
(93) Matano, C. Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto, 15, 351 (1932).
(94) Braune, H. Z. phys. Chem. 110, 147 (1924) (above 750° C).
(95) Jost,W. Z.p%s.C/&em.9B,73(1930)(between200and600°C.).
(96) Seith, W. Z. Elektrochem. 39, 538 (1933).
(97) Brick, M. and Philips, A. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metall.)
Engrs, 124, 331 (1937).
(98) Rhines, F. N. and Mehl, R. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metall.)
Engrs, 128, 185 (1938).
(99) Eyring, H. J. chem. Phys. 4, 283 (1936).
Eyring, H. and Wynne-Jones, W. J. chem. Phys. 3, 492 (1935).
(100) Tiselius, A. Z. phys. Chem. 169 A, 425 (1934).
(101) .Elam, Q. J. Inst. Metals, 43, 217 (1930).
(102) Smith, C. Min. and Metall. 13, 481 (1932).
(103) Wells, C. Metals Res. Lab., Carnegie Inst. Tech. unpublished
research.
(104) Warburg, E. and Tegetmeier, F. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 32,442(1887)
(105) Joffe, A. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 72, 495 (1923).
310 INTERDIFFUSION OF SOLIDS
(106) Bugahow, W. and Breschnewa, N. Tech. Phys. U.S.S.R., 2,
435 (1935).
Bugahow, W. and Rybalko, F. Tech. Phya. U.S.S.R: 2, 617
(1935).
(107) Spiers, F. Phil. Mag. 15, 1048 (1933).
(108) Matano, C. Jap. J. Phys. 8, 109 (1933); Proc. Phys. Math. Soc.
Japan, 15, 405 (1933).
(109) van Liempt, J. Z. Phys. 96, 534 (1935).
(110) Sen, B. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 199, 1189 (1934).
(110a) Borelius, G. Proc. Phys. Soc. Extra Part, 49, 77 (1937).
Bragg, W., Sykes, C. and Bradley, A. Proc. Phys. Soc. Extra
Part, 49, 96(1937).
(1106) Sykes, C. and Evans, H. J. Inst. Metals, 58, 255 (1936).
(111) Bernal, J. D. Int. Conf. on Phys. 2, 119 (1934).
(112) Smekal, A. Phys. Z. 26, 707 (1925).
(113) Jost, W. Z. phys. Chem. 6B, 88, 210 (1929); Z.phys. Ghent. 7B,
234 (1930).
Joffe, A. Z. Phys. 62, 730 (1930).
(114) Fajans, K. Fortschr. Phys. Wiss. 5, 294 (1926).
Reis, A. Z. Phys. 44, 353 (1927).
(115) Braunbek, W. Z. Phys. 44, 684 (1927); 38, 549 (1926).
(116) v. Seelen, D. Z. Phys. 29, 125 (1924).
(117) Cichocki, J. J. Phys. Radium, 7, 420 (1936).
(118) Dorn, J. and Harder, O. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metatt.) Engrs,
128, 156 (1938).
(119) Langmuir, I. and Dushman, S. Phys. Rev. 20, 113 (1922).
(120) Polanyi, M. and Wigner, E. Z. phys. Chem. 139A, 439,(1928).
(121) Bradley, R. S: Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 1185 (1937).
(122) Wheeler, C. Trans. Nat. Inst. Sci. India, 1, 333 (1938).
C H A P T E R VII
STRUCTURE-SENSITIVE DIFFUSION
these "internal surfaces " will occur more readily than volume
diffusion. The velocity of diffusion is largely governed by the
exponential term in the equation D = Doe~EIRT, so that if
-^surface < ^graln boundary < ^lattice*
the velocity of grain-boundary difiFusion may exceed that of
lattice diffusion even though the number of paths available
for lattice difiFusion is much greater than the number of paths
available for grain-boundary diffusion.
A third type of structure-sensitive difiFusion process is to
be attributed to impurities in the lattice. These may be incor-
porated during the growth of the crystal due to accidental
impurity of the mother liquor, or of the vapour. They may also
be introduced intentionally, as when alkali-halide lattices are
heated in alkali-metal vapours, halogen vapours, or mixed
gas atmospheres of hydrogen and alkali metal. Wagner (2) and
his co-workers introduced excess of one component by heating
the crystal in an atmosphere of its electronegative component
(O2 for CdO, ZnO, NiO, Cu2O; S for FeS; Br2 for CuBr; I 2
for Cul). It is not difficult to recognise the irreversible low-
temperature diffusion processes resulting from this type of
disorder because of the sensitivity of the high-temperature
conductivity to gas pressure. In the high-temperature region
there exists an equilibrium
Gaseous component ^ Component in excess in the lattice,
which Wagner (i) used to study the different kinds of equili-
brium disorder occurring at high temperatures in crystals.
When a crystal with an equilibrium excess of one component
is chilled to low temperatures, irreversible conductivity and
diffusion properties result (cf. Fig. 94, Chap. VI).
When the conductivity cannot be attributed to excess of
one component, i.e. when the conductivity is not sensitive to
changes in partial pressure of a surrounding gas atmosphere
of that component, and yet irreversible conductivity or
diffusion phenomena are observed, the behaviour may be
attributed either to grain-boundary difiFusion, or to lattice
disorder, frozen by rapid cooling of the high-temperature
IRREVERSIBLE FAULT IN REAL CRYSTALS 313
equilibrium state of disorder. To determine to which type of
fault the structure sensitivity is due requires that one should
know a great deal concerning the properties of the crystal.
The ways in which these properties have led one to envisage
different lattice imperfections may now be briefly reviewed.
Fig. 113. Particles on SiO2 glass, under strong grazing illumination ( x 850).
TABLE 78
Half-breadth Integrated
of sweep reflection
Crystal curve xlO 8
(NaCl) (200 face)
sec. 200 400 600
Natural crystal, 900 270 45 16
polished cleavage
Natural crystal, 40 to 50 102-5 26-3 9-8 For CuKa
untouched cleavage radiation
Artificial untouched 71 47-8 10-5 4-6 and NaCl
cleavage,
Renninger(JS)
Calculated for ideal
crystal:
Darwin (16) 4-2 450 12-1 6-9
PrinsdT) 4-9 410 9-9 51
V 3 2 3 2 3 2 .» 2 3 2
Energy (eV.)
Fig. 116. Absorption bands of colour centres in solution in
alkali halides at 10° C. (Pohlus)).
•"¥
^ ^
\
-e
\
\
-$
\
\
-10 i
7/Tx103(Tin«K.)
Fig. 117. The conductivity of various NaCl crystals. (The lowest
curve is for a single crystal.)
1S0 fiffl
t/TxW3(T/n"K.)
Fig. 118. Rock-salt crystals, heated for 10 hr. at a series of temperatures, show
an increasing conductivity. After 10 hr. at 160° C. (the lowest curve), rising
to 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 780 (the highest curve).
Fig. 119. The two conductivities for rock-salt. (1) True conductivity,
(2) conductivity after space-charge redistribution (Beran and Quittner(37>).
D x 10 cm. sec."1
7 2
5 10
T°C. 2185 2355
D x 10 cm.2 sec.-1
7
1-6 4-8 7-8 18
T°G. 2070 2188 2300 2400
REFERENCES
(1) Chapter VI, pp. 247 et seq., also 292 et seq.
Wagner, C. and Schottky, W. Z. phys. Che?n. 11B, 163 (1930).
Frenkel, J. Z. Phys. 35, 652 (1926).
Jost, W. J. chem. Phys. 1, 466 (1933); Z.<phys.Chem. 169A, 129
(1934).
Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 22B, 181 (1933).
(2) Baumbach, H. and Wagner, C. Z. phys. Chem. 22B, 199 (1933).
Dunwald, H. and Wagner, C. Z. phys. Cliem. 22B, 212 (1933).
(3) Orowan, E. Int. Conf. Phys. 2, 81 (1934).
(4) McBain, J. W. Sorption of Gases by Solids, p. 279. Routledge
(1932).
(5) Smekal, A. Int. Conf. Phys. 2, 93 (1934).
REFERENCES 335
(6) Lennard-Jones, J. E. and Dent, B. Proc. Boy. Soc. 121 A, 247
(1928).
(7) Lovell, A. Proc. Roy. Soc. 166A, 270 (1938).
Appleyard, E. Proc. Phys. Soc. 49, 118 (1937) (extra part).
(8) Poulter, T. and Wilson, R. Phys. Rev. 40, 877 (1932).
(9)' Bridgman, P. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bos, 42, 568 (1923); Proc.
Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 59, 173 (1924).
(10) Poulter, T. and Uffelman, L. Physics, 3, 147 (1932).
(11) Joffe, A. Int. Conf. Phys. 2, 77 (1934).
(12) Andrade, E. Int. Conf. Phys. 2, 112 (1934).
Andrade, E. and Martindale, J. Philos. Trans. 235, 69 (1935).
(13) Hilsch, R. and Pohl, R. Trans. Faraday Soc. 34, 883 (1938),
where numerous other references may be found. Also Pohl, R.
Proc. Phys. Soc. 49, 1 (1937) (extra part).
(14) Smekal A. Handbuch d. Phys. 24/2, 835. Berlin: Julius
Springer (1933).
(15) Renninger, M. Z. Kristallogr. 89, 344 (1934).
(16) Darwin, C. G. Phil. Mag. -27, 315, 675 (1914).
(17) Prins, I. Z. Phys. 63, 477 (1930).
(18) Zwicky, F. Rev. Mod. Phys. 6, 193 (1934).
(19) Goetz, A. Int. Conf. Phys. 2, 62 (1934); Z. KristaUogr. Sonder-
heft, 1934.
(20) Orowan, E. Z. Phys. 79, 573 (1932); 89, 774 (1934).
(21) Smith, D. and Derge, G. Trans. Amer. Electrochem. Soc. 669 253
(1934); J. Amer. chem. Soc. 56, 2513 (1934).
(22) Barrer, R. M. To be published.
(23) Buerger, M. J. Z. Kristallogr. 89, 195 (1934).
(24) de Boer, J. H. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bos, 56, 301 (1937).
(25) Mott, N. F. Trans. Faraday Soc. 34, 822 (1938).
(26) Smekal, A. Handbuch d. Phys. 24/2, 883 (1933).
(27) v. Hevesy, G. Z. phys. Chem. 101, 337 (1922).
(28) Tammann, G. and Veszi, G. Zeit. anorg. Chem. 150, 355 (1926).
v. Seelen, D. Z. Phys. 29, 125 (1924).
(29) Goethals, C. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bas, 49, 357 (1930).
(30) Smekal, A. (with Quittner, F.). Z. Phys. 55, 298 (1929).
(31) Fritsch, C. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 60, 300 (1897).
(32) Ketzer, R. Z. Elektrochem. 26, 77 (1920).
Le Blanc, M. Z. Elektrochem. 18, 549 (1912).*
(33) Gyulai, Z. Z. Phys. 67, 812 (1931).
(34) Lehfeldt, W. Z. Phys. 85, 717 (1933).
(35) Seith,W. Z. Phys. 56, 802 (1929).
(36) Tubandt, C. and Reinhold, H. Z. ElektrocHem. 29, 313 (1923).
(37) Beran, O. and Quittner, F. Z. Phys. 64, 760 (1930).,
Wenderowitsch, A. and Drisina, R. Z. Phys. 98, 108 (1936).
(38) Gyulai, Z. and Hartley, D. Z. Phys. 51, 378 (1928).
(39) Stepanow, A. Z. Phys. 81, 560 (1933).
(40) Joffe, A. Z. Phys. 62, 73b (1930).
336 STBUCTURE-SENSITIVE DIFFUSION
(41) Gyulai, Z. Z. phys. 78, 630 (1932).
(42) Smekal, A. Z. Techn. Phys. 8, 561 (1927).
(43) Seith, W. Z. Elektrochem. 39, 538 (1933).
(44) Bugahow, W. and Rybalko, F. Tech. Phys. U.S.S.R. 2, 617
(1935).
(45) v. Hevesy, G. Z. Elektrochem. 39, 490 (1933).
(46) Fonda, G., Young, A. and Walker, A. Physics, 4, 1 (1933)..
(47) v. Hevesy, G., Seith, W. and Keil, A. Z. Phys. 79, 197 (1932).
Seith, W. and Keil, A. Z. Metallic. 25, 104 (1933).
(48) Gehrts, A. Z. Techn. Phys. 15, 456 (1934).
(49) Langmuir, I. Phys. Rev. 22, 357 (1923).
(50) Mehl, R. Trans. Amer. Inst. min. (metall.) Engrs, 122, 11 (1936);
J. Appl. Phys. 8, 174 (1937).
(51) Dushman, S., Dennison, D. and Reynolds, N. Phys. Rev. 29, 903
(1927).
(52) Andrews, M. J. phys. Cliem. 27, 270 (1923).
Andrews, M. and Dushman, S. J. phys. Chem. 29, 462 (1925).
(53) Zwikker, C. Physica, 7, 189 (1927).
(54) v. Liempt, J. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bas, 51, 117 (1932).
(55) Feitknecht, W. Z. Elekrochem. 35, 142 (1929).
Pilling, N. and Bedworth, R. J. Inst. Met. 29, 529 (1923).
Dunn, J. Proc. Roy. Soc. I l l A, 203, 210 (1926).
(56) Wilkins, F. and Rideal, E. K. Proc. Roy. Soc. 128 A, 394 (1930).
(57) Barrer, R. M. J. chem. Soc. p. 378 (1934).
(58) Burton, F., Braaten, E. and Wilhelm, J. Canad. J. Res. 8, 463
(1933).
(59) Urry, W. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 54, 3887 (1932).
(60) McBain, J. W. Sorption of Gases by Solids, p. 264 (1932).
(61) Deming, H. and Hendricks, B. J . Amer. chem. Soc. 45, 2857
(1923).
Hendricks, B. and Ralston, R. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 51, 3278
(1929).
(62) Graham, T. J. chem. Soc. Series n, 7, 419 (1869); Proc. Roy. Soc.
17, 212, 500 (1869); Chemical and Physical Researches, p. 269
(1876).
(63) Roeser, W. Bur. Stand. J. Res., Wash., 7, 485 (1931).
(64) Giess, W. and v. Liempt, J. Z. anorg. Chem. 168, 107 (1927).
(65) Sakharova, M. Tzveinuie Metallui (Non-Ferrous Metals), No. 4
(1932).
CHAPTER VIII
INTRODUCTION
Since molecules, ions and atoms can move in solid lattices (as
when ammonia is sorbed by natroiite, or two metals or salts
interdiffuse), it is not difficult to visualise a similar migration
of particles along external surfaces. Grain-boundary diffusion
occurs more readily than lattice diffusion (for example, the
activation energies are 90 and 120k.cal. respectively for
thorium diffusing in tungsten (i)), so that surface migration
might be expected to occur more readily still. The main lines
of experiment which have led to the present knowledge of
surface migration are:
(1) The study of the growth and dissolution of single
crystals.
(2) Phenomena of condensation and aggregation of con-
tinuous films on solid surfaces.
(3) Examination of stable monolayer or multi-layer systems
by photoelectric and thermionic methods.
Much of the early evidence of the reality of surface migration
came from the first source, and this more or less classical
evidence may now be reviewed.
20
o
X
Bulk »u»ta!64°K-
500
Thickness {A.)
Fig. 125. The change in resistivity at a critical nominal film
thickness for mercury on pyrex.
600r
s
I
I
• « i
20 40 60 80 100.
Ncr-Nt" fa '
o A. JS
where fA and/g are the partition functions for the mobile and
immobile atoms. The fraction NA/(NS — NA) approaches unity
at high temperatures, and the system behaves as a two-
dimensional gas. At low temperatures NA/(NS-NA) tends to
zero, and one has an immobile film. Since mercury still
aggregates on pyrex at 20° K., according to Appleyard and
LovelFs(23) electrical conductivity measurements (p. 344),
mercury-on-pyrex must have a very small value of E. It is
interesting that mercury shows a high mobility on a crystal
of mercury at — 63° C. (p. 337) and a very small sorption heat
on silver (Table 85). The activation energy for diffusion of
mercury on the surface of tin, as an amalgam (p. 369), was only
1920cal./atom, and occurred rapidly at room temperatures.
MEASUREMENTS OF SURFACE MIGRATION IN
SOME STABLE FILMS
(bxR + W)
-[M(l-er^)] (O<0<O-85).
gl0\lmllo)
This type of deviation may be attributed to the variations
in /i with 6 or N, so that the first assumption need be true
only for dilute films.
Becker and Brattain(24) condensed thorium at a constant
rate upon a tungsten strip, and measured the growth of log i
as a function of time t. If the time needed to build up a film
showing maximum electron emission is tm, the following
relationship holds: ^
/
•X
1
1i
NE TEST (DEPOSITION VERY U NIFORM)
° ?AKEN
p IN TUBE NO.I
IFFERENT TESTS ALL TAKEN
/
• OX A f
SI TUBE NO.2
O V'ALUE FOR CLEAN TUNGSTE M RIBBON
MINIMUM VALUE LOGiO 1 /.
•J BTAINEO / l M
MPIRICAL EQUATION
F»ROBABLC CURVE FOR f >0- SO
f
Fig. 127. The thermionic activity of a tungsten ribbon versus the
time of deposition from thorium wire.
1-6 20 2-4
Distance along* strip, cm
Fig. 128. The absorption of sodium by a sodium-free tungsten strip.
A. 5 mins.
F. 1 min. \
B. 10 „
C. 20 „ fat 295° K. G. 3 mins. I
at 415° K.
D. 40 H. 5 „
E. 60 I. 11 ,, i
(a)
20 40 60
Time in minutes
Fig. 129. The concentration of sodium at the peak of the
curves of Fig. 128, as a function of time.
Curve (a) 415° K. Slope = 0022.
Curve (b) 293° K. Slope = 0-00067.
or
and thus
or C
dt dx\ dx
dCdD ndC .
%
dx dx dx
Also, since D = Doe~b/T,
d D d l
b D (
J,
o
C(x, t) dx = nt,
dt ~ dx\ dxj
can one allow for variations in D with C. This law cannot be
satisfactorily applied by using thermionic methods, which
give only integrated-effects over the filament. The photo-
electric method, however, is potentially capable of application
to measure D as a function of C. If, by using the method A (ii)
of Taylor and Langmuir (p. 352), the central part of a tungsten
filament were cleared of caesium, for example, and the caesium
from the sides then diffused inwards to the centre, the actual
concentration gradients could be measured by a photoelectric
exploration of the wire with a spot of light. The concentration-
distance curves can then be submitted to Matano's analysis
(Chap. I, p. 47) of the equation
dt ~ dx\ dxj
to give D as a function of 0. No such experiment has yet been
made, and until this has been done the surface diffusion data
must suffer in accuracy, although the main properties of
surface flow are reasonably well established.
360 MIGRATION IN SURFACE LAYER OF SOLIDS
^ < ?K -1
, — • * "
• *—-
• •
• EXPfIRIMENTAL POINTS
Then one may read off values of dC/dx from the graph, and
rb
find (Co— C)dx graphically, and so compute D. The results
Ja
are indicated by the following set of data:
$=32min. $=27 min. $ = 60 n
(*£) 79 39 60
The method of Brattain and Becker (p. 351) has been used
to show that migration of barium and caesium can occur.
When barium (or caesium) was deposited on one side of the
tungsten strip, which was then raised to 1000° K., the therm-
ionic emissions from the front and back slowly became equal.
The value o f / = 6jdm on the front was initially 0-80, while
after the flashing at 1000°K., the final value of/ on both
back and front was 0*4.
Becker (51) remarked that while most of the results described
relate to electropositive films, they should also apply to
electronegative ones, such as oxygen, save that here the
electron emission is decreased as the quantity of oxygen sorbed
is increased. An experiment suggested that oxygen migrated
very rapidly at 1400° K. These statements would merit further
study, since the great readiness with which tungsten chemi-
sorbs oxygen from the surroundings may vitiate many results.
In a study of the properties of indium, thallium and gallium
films on tungsten oxide, Powell and Mercer (25) observed that,
at temperatures 200° C. below the temperature of evaporation
of ions, there was a gradual decay with time in the positive ion
current (tested by momentarily raising the temperature of
the system). These effects may be understood by assuming a
migration into the oxide or over its surface. Similar obser-
vations (29) were made on a Cs-Fe2O3 system, in which it was
shown that the photoelectric current decayed with time, and
that an inward or lateral spreading of caesium in the oxide
was a possible explanation.*
K611er(29) deposited caesium on a silver surface, to give a
multimolecular layer, and then exposed the composite surface
to the action of oxygen. Simultaneous observations of the
photoelectric properties of the Cs-Cs2O-Ag surface showed that
as fast as caesium oxide was formed it was covered by a
polyatomic layer by processes of readjustment by diffusion in
* In this case the contamination of the metal by gas, or its re-evaporation, were
not positively excluded, so that the evidence is not conclusive.
MIGRATION OF OTHEJt SUBSTANCES 369
the film, so that the photoelectric properties remained almost
unaltered until nearly all the caesium was used up.
Two other methods of obtaining information concerning
surface migration are worthy of mention. The first is the
method of the radioactive indicator. If polonium is deposited
on a silver foil, at one end only, and the temperature is raised
to 300° C, a creeping of the polonium along the silver could
be noted, the velocity of which increased as the temperature
was raised (52). No volume diffusion of polonium through the
foil took place up to 500° C, an interesting commentary upon
the relative ease with which surface and volume diffusion
occur.
The second method is one which may have some general
applicability to amalgams. It consists in measuring the rate at
which mercury will spread over metal surfaces. Spiers (53)
found that a drop of mercury spreads over tin foil in circular
or elliptical areas in which, when diffusion has ceased, there
is a uniform mercury content (11*8 %Hg). There is thus a
concentration discontinuity from 11*8% to 0% mercury at
the edge of the area, and the edge may be easily observed.
Alty and Clark (54) made quantitative measurements on rates
of spreading, which they found to be sensitive to the pre-
treatment of the surface and the nature of the medium (water,
oil, or air) in contact with it. The surface diffusion was much
more rapid than the volume diffusion, for after a surface
diffusion of several centimetres the mercury had penetrated
into a tin block by a fraction of a millimetre only.
The spreading of mercury up the surface of tin rods dipping
into the mercury was a one-dimensional diffusion which was
assumed to obey the following conditions:
() D
and so , = constant, C.
I *sJ\JJt)
Accordingly D = #2/402tf and #2 is a linear function of t. From
the slopes of #2 — t curves at various temperatures,an activation
energy for surface diffusion of 1920 caL/atom was calculated.
Th- /.
= 1-84 x lO"9 at 1535° K. for 0 ^ 1
This means that the height of the energy barriers for an atom
moving in the direction of increasing N is greater than that
for an atom moving in the opposite direction, and leads to the
expression r- 2p n
F=
i i * A^I T «/ 7000-3200/
log 2> = log/+ 0-71 - 1 - 6 / y S
(1-0-0004T)
f (dynes cm."1), (degrees cm.-1)
when T is small
002 0-06 015
01 1-4 3-6
0-2 5-6 130
0-4 220 420
0-8 900 1100
10 1400 1500
374 MIGRATION IN SURFACE LAYER OF SOLIDS
A-Ao
where A and Ao denote the areas occupied per adatom in a
film of surface concentration N(N = 1/-4), and at saturation
(N = No = l/A0) respectively. When Ao = 11*7 A.2 one may
employ the values of the electrostatic spreading pressure in
Table 91, and so plot F-A curves for the Na-OW system.
Below 700° K. the curves obtained resemble those for a con-
densible gas, so that the spreading forces calculated from
experiment should lead to the formation of two phases.
Probably the two phases of caesium on tungsten detected
PHASE CHANGES IN STABLE MONOLAYERS 375
by Langmuir and Taylor (46,35,47) were of this kind (p. 353).
Langmuir(47) attempted a kinetic analysis of conditions
favouring equilibrium between two such phases.
The phases discussed here are coexistent in a monolayer.
Their constitution therefore differs from that of films of
cadmium or mercury on glass (pp. 341 et seq.), where mono-
layer systems rearrange themselves into three-dimensional
aggregates. An exact analysis, employing statistical mechanics,
of conditions yielding a two-dimensional condensed phase
or a three-dimensional aggregate would be of importance.
Preliminary studies of the behaviour of double layer films
have been made by Cernuschi(59) and by Dube(60).
D
T + T*'
In this expression a denotes a constant (| or J), v denotes the
average velocity of an adsorbed atom for the period T during
which it is activated and T* is the time between successive
activations. The attempt to calculate T and T* has been made
for two cases:
(1) When the activation energy is received by atomic
vibrations from the underlying solid (64). It was concluded
that, when RT ^E,T was of the order 10"1* sec, and nearly
independent of temperature.
(2) When the activation energy is received by collisions
between metallic electrons from the adsorbent, and the
adatom(65). It was again found that T was approximately
10~12 sec, and nearly independent of the temperature. Since
metallic electrons may have as much as 50k.cal. of energy,
376 MIGRATION IN SURFACE LAYER OF SOLIDS
and there may be 1015 collisions/second with the adatom, it is
evident that an ample reservoir of energy is available, and
that strongly bound adatoms may be activated.
The corresponding values of r* are of course strongly de-
pendent on temperature, since they contain the Boltzmann
factor e~EIRT. It can also be shown (61) that
and D =
and if En<gRT to D =
<f>(E0/RTy
Finally, when Eo tends to zero, D = avH, where r is the
interval between successive collisions in a two-dimensional
gas. In this case simple theories give to a the value J. Applica-
tions of the theory to the diffusion of sodium on oxygen-
tungsten surfaces (26) led to a mean free path in the activated
state of - 1 0 - 7 cm.
377
50
40
I 30
20
10
—4
-60 -80 -100 -120 -140 -160
Temperature (° C.)
Fig. 131. Critical condensation phenomena for cadmium.
• , on glass; 0 , on sulphur; O, on naphthalene.
REFERENCES
(1) E.g. Langmuir, I. J. Franklin Inst. 217, 543
(2) Volmer, M. and Estermann, J. Z. Phys. 7, 13 (1921).
(3) Volmer, M. and Adhikari, G. Z. Phys. 35, 170 (1925).
(4) Z. phys, Chem. 119, 46 (1926).
(5) Moll, F. Z. phys. Chem. 136, 183 (1928).
(6) Richter,M. Diss.T.H., Berlin, 1931.
Volmer, M. Trans. Faraday Soc. 28, 359 (1932).
(6a) Berg, W. Proc. Boy. Soc. 164A, 79 (1938).
(7) Gen, M., Zelmanov, I. and Schalnikow, A. Phys. Z. Sowjet. 4, 825
(1933).
(8) Kirschner, F. Z. Phys. 76, 576 (1932).
(9) Thomson, G. P., Stuart, N. and Murison, C. A. Proc. phys. Soc.
45, 381 (1933).
(10) Farnsworth, H. E. Phys. Rev. 42, 588 (1932); 43, 900 (1933);
47, 331 (1935).
(11) Deubner, A. Naturwissenschaften, 23, 557 (1935).
380 MIGRATION IN SURFACE LAYER OF SOLIDS
(12) Swamy, R. S. Proc. phys. Soc. 46, 739 (1934).
(13) Lane, C. T. Nature, Lond., 130, 999 (1932).
(14) Briick, L. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 26, 233 (1936).
(15) Finch, G. and Quarrell, A» G. Nature, Lond., 131, 877 (1933);
Proc. Roy. Soc. 141 A, 398 (1933).
(16) Natta, G. Naturwissenschaften, 23, 527 (1935).
(17) See Lange, H., Kolloidzschr. 78, 109, 231 (1937) for a review.
(18) E.g. Andrade, E. Trans. Faraday Soc. 31, 1157 (1935).
Liepus, T. Glastechn. Ber. 13, 270 (1935).
(19) Hass, G. Naturwissenschaften, 25, 232 (1937).
(20) Estermann, J. Z. phys. Chem. 106, 403 (1923).
(21) Cockcroft, J. Proc. Roy. Soc. 119A, 293 (1928).
(22) E.g. Langmuir, I. Ada Phys.-chim. 1, 371 (1934).
(23) Appleyard, E. Proc. phys. Soc. 49, 118 (1937); Discussion on
Conductivity Electricity in Solids.
Appleyard, E. and Lovell, A. Proc. Roy. Soc. 158 A, 718 (1937).
Loyell, A. Proc. Roy. Soc. 157A, 311 (1936); 166A, 270 (1938).
(24) Brattain, W. and Becker, J. A. Phys. Rev. 43, 428 (1933).
(25) Powell, C. F. and Mercer, R. L. Philos. Trans. 235 A, 101
(1935-36).
(26) Bosworth, R. C. Proc. Roy. Soc. 150 A, 58 (1935).
(27) Proc. Roy. Soc. 154A, 112 (1936).
(28) Frank, L. Trans. Faraday Soc. 32, 1402 (1936).
(29) Roller, L. Phys. Rev. 36, 1643 (1930).
(30) Estermann, J. Z. Phys. 33, 320 (1925).
(31) Knauer, F. and Stern, O. Z. Phys. 39, 774 (1926).
(32) Ditchbum, R. Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 29, 131 (1933).
(33) Zahn, H. and Kramer, J. Z. Phys. 86, 413 (1933).
Kramer, J. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 19, 37 (1934).
(34) Tammann, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 22, 73 (1935).
(35) Taylor, J. B. and Langmuir, I. Phys. Rev. 44, 423 (1933).
(36) Orr, W. J. C. Trans. Faraday Soc. 35, 1247 (1939).
(37) E.g. Lennard-Jones, J. E. Trains. Faraday Soc. 28, 333 (1932).
(38) Barrer, R. M. Proc. Roy. Soc. 161 A, 476 (1937).
(39) Dixit, K. R. Phil. Mag. 16, 1049 (1933).
(40) Langmuir, I. Phys. Rev. 22, 357 (1923).
(41) Becker, J. A. Phys. Rev. 33, 1082 (Abstract) (1929).
(42) Langmuir, I. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 54, 1252 (1932).
See also Langmuir, I. and Kingdon, K. H. Proc. Roy. Soc. 107 A,
61 (1925).
(43) Langmuir, I. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 35, 105 (1913).
(44) Roberts, J. K. Proc. Roy. Soc. 152 A, 445 (1935).
Langmuir, I. and Villars, D. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 53, 495 (1931).
(45) Becker, J. A. Trans. Amer. electrochem. Soc. 55, 153 (1929); Phys.
Rev. 28, 341 (1926); Phys. Rev. 34, 1323 (1929).
(46) Langmuir, I. and Taylor, J. B. Phys. Rev. 40, 463 (1932).
(47) Langmuir, I. J. chem. Phys. 1, 3 (1933).
REFERENCES 381
(48) Ives, H. Astrophys. J. 60, 4 (1924).
Ives, H. and Olpin, A. Phys. Rev. 34, 117 (1929).
(49) Jeffreys, H. Camb. Math. Tracts, No. 23, 10 (1927).
(50) Orr, W. J. C. and Butler, J. J. chem. Soc. p. 1273 (1935).
(61) Becker, J. A. Trans. Faraday Soc. 28, 148 (1932).
(52) Schwartz, K. Z. phys. Chem. 168 A, 241 (1934).
(53) Spiers, F. Phil. Mag. 15, 1048 (1933).
(54) Alty, T. and Clark, A. Trans. Faraday Soc. 31, 648 (1935).
(55) Bosworth, R. C. Proc. Boy. Soc. 162A, 32 (1937).
(56) Topping, J. Proc. Roy. Soc. 114A, 67 (1927).
(57) Lacher, J. Proc. Roy. Soc. 161 A, 525 (1937).
(58) Rideal, E. K. Surface Chemistry, chap, in (1930).
(59) Cernuschi, F. Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 34/392 (1938).
(60) Dube, G. Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 34, 587 (1938).
(61) Lennard-Jones, J. E. Proc. phys. Soc. 49, 140 (1937); Discussion
on Conduction of Electricity in Solids.
(62) Alty, T. Phil. Mag. 15, 1035 (1933).
(63) Ward, A. F. Proc. Roy. Soc. 133A, 506 (1931).
(64) Lennard-Jones, J. E. and Strachan, C. Proc. Roy. Soc. 150A, 442
(1935).
(65) Lennard-Jones, J. E. and Goodwin, E. Proc. Roy. Soc. 163 A,
101 (1937).
(66) E.g. Bangham, D. and Fakhoury, N. J. chem. Soc. p. 1324 (1931).
(67) Maxted, E. B. and co-workers. J. chem. Soc. p. 502 (1933);
pp. 26, 672 (1934); pp. 393, 1190 (1935).
(68) E.g. Taylor, H. S. Trans. Faraday Soc. 28, 247 (1932).
(69) Knudsen, M. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 50, 472 (1916).
(70) Wood, R. W. Phil. Mag. 30, 300 (1915); 32, 364 (1916).
(71) Semenoff, N. Z. phys. Chem. 7B, 471 (1930).
(72) Chariton, J., Semenoff, N. and Schalnikow, A. Trans. Faraday
Soc. 28, 169 (1932).
(73) Devonshire, A. Proc. Roy. Soc. 156A, 37 (1937).
(74) Frisch, R. and Stern, O. Z. Phys. 84, 430 (1933).
C H A P T E R IX
P E R M E A T I O N , SOLUTION AND D I F F U S I O N
OF G A S E S I N O R G A N I C S O L I D S
PERMEABILITY SPECTRUM
Membrane-forming organic solids include waxes, fats, rubbers,
proteins and protein derivatives, cellulose and cellulose
derivatives, resins and alkyl sulphide polymers. Many syn-
thetic polymers have valuable properties of plasticity, rigidity
or elasticity. One finds every type of gas flow through them,
and a diversity of permeabilities which receives a number of
practical applications. In technological journals there are
numerous studies of gas flow through rubbers (especially
helium, air and hydrogen); of the flow of water., air and carbon
dioxide through fruit and food wrappings and cartons; and of
air and water through gutta percha and paragutta insulators,
leathers, and paint and varnish films. On the theoretical side
these polymers provide material for the study of diffusion
kinetics, and of various types of gas flow in solids, such as
activated diffusion, molecular flow, streamline flow, or orifice
flow. Of special interest are transition regions between one
type of flow and another, as yet little studied.
The process of diffusion in polymers may conveniently be
discussed in two parts: first, the flow of gases and not easily
condensible vapours (CO2, SO2, NH 3 ) in organic solids; and
second, the flow of water and organic liquids and vapours
through the membranes. This is because, as the sequel will
show, gas diffusion obeys the simple law
3C_ 82C
8* &r2
fairly rigorously, while vapour diffusion does not usually do so.
It is possible to arrange the permeabilities of organic mem-
branes to air, for example, in a permeability spectrum (i) as
indicated in Fig. 132.
PERMEABILITY SPECTRUM 383
The permeabilities in Fig. 132 are expressed in c.c./sec./
cm.2/cm. of Hg pressure and are therefore not absolute, since
thickness (which may vary from several millimetres to a
fraction of a millimetre) has not been included. Generally a
given type of membrane will give somewhat different per-
meabilities for different specimens. Thus we have border-line
cases such as vegetable parchment listed in sections B and C;
or cellulose compounds most of which could be grouped in
section A as well as section B, according to the variable degrees
of permeability which may be encountered.
A B C D
Includes Includes papers, fibre- Textile
semi-papers boards and leather fabrics
Balloon Cellulose Filter paper Tagboard
fabrics nitrate Blotting Bond paper
"Cellophane" Cellulose paper Railroad
Regenerated acetate Insulating, board
cellulose Cellulose board Solid binders
Rubbers esters Newsprint board
Neoprene Glassine paper Pressboard
Polysulphides Vegetable Antique Vegetable
Resins parchment book paper parchment
Lapquers Asphalt Lined straw Leathers
Paints saturated board
paper Super-
calendered
book paper
-8 -7 -6 5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
log (permeability)
Fig. 132. Showing the logarithm of the permeability towards
air of groups of organic membranes.
1 NR
k
(CH t ) B
CO
CO CHtOH
A i
(CH S ) B
c'o
CO CH2OH
A i
(CH 2 ) n c'o
CO
CH2OH
o
CH2OH
!H—CH8—CH—CH8—CH—CH2CH. CH8
CH—CH8—CH8—CH8— —CH—CH8
Poly-divinyl benzene
OH
CH.CH8-Y'\-CHJ
CH8
dk I I d
Tensile
Ester Specific Melting-point strength (14)
weight (°C.)(13) (kg./mm.s)
Acetate 1-377 245 9-12
Propionate 1-268 239 6-7
Butyrate 1178 183 5-6
Valerate 1178 160 4-5
Capronate 1-110 87 2-5
Fig. 138. Portion of space model of the structure of wool or human hairua)
Fig. 139. Discontinuous micellar structure postulated for cellulose (23). a, Haupt-
valenzketten; b, intramicellar regions; c, intermicellar holes; d, intermicellar
long spaces.
11
394 PERMEATION, SOLUTION, DIFFUSION OF GASES
TABLE 94 (continued)
System Temp. °C. PxlO*
H2-polystyrene-butadiene I 19-9 0-0084
polymer 11 210 00112
Hj-chloroprene polymer 31-8 00049
(pure) 39-7 00086
41-3 0-0088
49-9 00116
58-7 00179
69-5 00214
73-5 00411
N2-"neoprene" 271 000137
35-4 00023
441 0-0032
541 00058
65-4 00106
84-7 00222
Ng-butadiene-acrylonitrile 200 0-00061
interpolymer 381 00019
48-5 00029
59-5 0-0048
70-5 00070
78-6 00178
Nt-butadiene-methyl- 21-2 0-0028
methacrylate interpolymer 44-6 00057
540 0-0087
61-9 00132
770 0023
Ng-polystyrene-butadiene 200 00029
interpolymer 35-5 00057
500 00102
64-2 00161
A-"neoprene" 361 0-0068
52-2 00144
61-8 00224
73-7 00311
86-2 00655
A-butadiene-methyl- 200 00059
methacrylate interpolymer 30-8 00111
39-2 00162
51-8 0027
62-3 00395
A-polystyrene-butadiene I 19-5 00109
polymer 30-3 00195
40-7 0-0287
51-2 0041
64-6 0074
II 640 0036
396 PERMEATION, SOLUTION, DIFFUSION OF 1&ASES
Sager found that the rubber with four sulphur atoms per
primary molecule was the less permeable of the two, but in
agreement with Table 94 both were much less permeable than
polyisoprene rubber (Table 95). Barrer(35a) extended his work
on rubber-like polymers to rigid or inelastic membranes of
bakelite, ebonite and " cellophane " (Table 96). For these mem-
branes the permeability is considerably smaller than that of
elastic membranes, with the exception of vulcaplas or poly-
ethylene sulphide rubbers. This result is true for rigid mem-
branes of inorganic (SiO2, B2O3, glass) as well as of organic
substances (Table 97). Not only are rigid membranes usually
less permeable, but they are also more selective in preventing
the diffusion of inert gases of high molecular weight (N 2 ,0 2 , A),
while allowing light gases (He, H2, Ne) to diffuse (Chap. III).
Sager (36) measured the hydrogen permeability of a large
number of film-forming substances supported on a closely
woven cotton fabric. The membranes included
Inelastic:
CH 8 0H
Regenerated cellulose-
CH 8 0H
Poly vinyl alcohol CH—CH2—CH—CHt—CH
OH OH OH
Q. 200
o
a ISO
/
A T 0°C
PRESSURES IN ATMOSPHERES
gas laws at these pressures, since Wustner (see Chap. Ill) found
linear permeation rate-pressure curves for hydrogen and silica
up to 800 atm. Rather the effect might be ascribed to an
influence of pressure upon the membrane itself (compression
or distension) and suggests that deformation can modify
permeabilities.
3-3
where vx = the volume flowing per unit time into the tube at
pressure pl9
v2 = the volume flowing per unit time into the tube at
pressure p2,
Ap=p1-p2>
ri = the viscosity of the gas,
I = the length of the pore, of radius r.
TABLE 101. Temperature coefficients, E9 of permeability constants (33,35a) in cal./moL
E (caL/mol.)
He H, N, Ar CO co2 H2O
Elastic membrane:
Rubber (vulcanised) 6,300, 6000, — — — — 7600 2800
A ACifi
D,*UU DOUU
Rubber (unvulcanised) 9500
___ 8200 9500 9600
7,800
*' Neoprene'' (vulcanised) 8,800 8300 10,500 10,700 — — — —
Butadiene-acrylonitrile inter- — 8200 9,800 — — — — —
poiymer —
Butadiene-methyl-methacrylate 9,500 8,850
interpolymer
Butadiene-polystyrene inter- — — 7,900 7,900 — — — —
polymer
Chloroprene polymer — 8300 — — — — — —
Ethylene polymer 7,700 8050 — •
— — — — —
Inelastic membrane:
Bakelite 5100 10,500
Ebonite 5,900 6500 — —
"Cellophane" 10,100 — — — — — —
Celluloid 5600
Nitrocellulose 5700
Triacetyl cellulose 7500 —
Regenerated cellulose — 7600 — — — — — —
Pi
2±- = c o n s t a n t ^
Ap
The constant depends upon the area of the nozzle, and not
its length.
The properties of streamline and orifice flow are summarised
in Table 102(49), and can easily be verified by reference to the
equations of flow. The very complete series of experiments by
Carson (49) has tested these features for numerous papers. For
the thinnest tissues the behaviour with respect to Ap sug-
gested that flow might be intermediate between streamline
and orifice flow. Within the uncertainties of using different
samples an inverse proportionality existed between the per-
meation velocity and the thickness, while a small change in
temperature had a negligible influence upon the rate of flow.
The results are on the whole more in conformity with Poiseuille
flow than with orifice flow. The effect of altering the absolute
pressure pl9 for a constant Ap, however, was not in accord with
either theory, and was attributed by the author to elastic
deformations of the membrane under pressure. In addition,
an approximate proportionality between area and diffusion
AIR PERMEABILITY 409
rate was observed, and it was shown that the relative humidity
of the air bore no simple relationship to the permeation
velocity. In order for Poiseuille flow to occur in these mem-
branes, the length of the capillaries must be much greater than
their diameter. I t is therefore probable that the actual
thickness of the membranes is less than the length of the
capillaries.
In Table 103 Carson's (49) data have been converted to
absolute permeabilities, and show the range of permeability
constants covered by the paper section of group C of Fig. 132.
TABLE 104
A. Sole leathers
Permeability x 102
Thickness c.c./sec./cm.2/mjn. thick/cm. Hg
Type of leather cm.
G*-*F F->G
English bend 0-608 910 7-30
0-438 5-76 5-40
0-490 7-40 7-80
0-420 4-65 4-74
0-390 406 3-29
Waterproofed Eng- 0-536 4-76 5-34
lish bend 0-415 1-63 1-50
French bend 0-350 4-42 414
0-370 1:42 1-32
0-420 1-97 2-21
0-382 1-85 1-85
0-624 3-94 4-08
B. Upper leathers
Box calf 0140 15-7 111
0130 14-2 7-55
0120 20-7 17-65
Gorse calf 0195 130 604
0160 110 6-00
0-210 28-2 24-60
Willow calf 0095 70 2-95
0130 28-3 22-6
0130 15-9 8-52
Glace kid 0060 0;734 0-360
0070 1-78 1-24
0050 1-22 0-60
Heavy chrome 0-312 405 2-47
tanned upper 0-310 2-78 0-485
0-280 1-21 0-422
0-320 7-42 4-36
Heavy vegetable 0-240 00128 000413
tanned upper 0-252 00176 00176
(stuffed) 0-240 000428 000418
0-230 000845 00128
Russia calf (vegetable 0-220 59-5 62-5
tanned) 0160 37-9 38-5
0180 62-8 651
Patent leather 0125 0 0
0090 0 0
0120 0 0
certain cases the rate of flow through the leather was pro-
portional to the pressure difference (51), in others the constant
of proportionality changed with pressure, or with the treat-
ment given the membrane (50). Sometimes the rate of flow
from the flesh to the grain side is different from that in the
converse direction (52) (see Table 104).
In Table 104 are given some absolute permeabilities
for a number of leathers, calculated from data given by
Edwards (50).
Bergmann and Ludewig's(5i) figures for sole leather agree,
when converted to similar units, with those found by Edwards
in range and order of magnitude. Wilson and Lines (53)
made a study of the .air and water permeability of leather in
which they found a parallelism between these permeabilities
when the leather contained neatsfoot oil, or was finished
with collodion or casein.
Membranes in series
When the leather membranes are placed in contact (51), and
the permeabilities of the separate membranes are P1 and P2>
it was found that the resultant permeability, P, was within
6 % given by 1 x x
L =—
P = D ^ ( F i c k ' s law),
Cx = kp (Henry's law),
/-a} M I T
30'S'C. Jzo'C
100 200
Time (mins.)
Fig. 144. The time lag in setting up a steady state of flow. ©,argonin butadiene-
methyl- methacrylate interpolymer; x , nitrogen in butadiene-met hyl-
methacrylate interpolymer.
bility does not agree with some more recent data (p. 418) for
hydrogen and air, although the actual solubilities are similar.
Htifner (30) found that rubber will sorb its own volume of carbon
dioxide at room temperature, but could not measure the
absorption of hydrogen, oxygen, or nitrogen. Reychler(3i)
found that rubber sorbed 1-06 vol. of CO2 at 18° C, and
26 vol. of SO2. The most complete and satisfactory measure-
ments of solubility by the static method were made by Venable
and Puwa(57). They showed that Henry's law was obeyed for
120
110
100 ^
90
\
50
\
40
\
30
20
10
20 49 60 eo loo no HO
c.c.gas at N.P.T. perWOc.c.rubber
Fig. 146. The influence of temperature upon the solubility of CO2 in rubber.
2-0
data are obtained for liquids (62) and polymers (33), it appears
that there is a larger entropy decrease by 4 or 5 units for the
^ Gas dissolving in polymer
than for the process
Gas dissolving in liquid-
According to the theory of polymer-monomer solutions an
additional entropy is to be expected, there being R entropy
units difference in the two processes(62a). This entropy
difference is configurational; in other words, there are more
ways of mixing flexible long chain molecules with monomer
molecules than there are of mixing two simple molecular species.
The activation energy for diffusions in rubbers is as large
for helium and for hydrogen as the corresponding energies in
rigid inorganic membranes of silica glass (Chap. III). The
energy of activation rises as the molecular weight of the
diffusing molecule increases, although the increases in the
energy with molecular weight are very much smaller than
those found in rigid membranes of silica glass. The influence
of molecular weight upon the activation energy can be
illustrated by reference to published data upon gas-silica (626),
gas-heulandite(63), gas-cellulose (35a, 37), and gas-neoprene(33)
diffusion systems (Table 109).
One feature which has to be explained is the magnitude of
the activation energy in rubbers, since the internal elasticity
on a molecular scale might be expected to reduce the energy
barrier involved in migration. When one calculates the energy
needed to cause a gas atom to pass through an elastic two-
dimensional crystal, it can be shown (33) that the potential
energy barrier becomes very small indeed with only minor
elastic displacements of the components of the two-dimensional
lattice. Barrer advanced the theory that the major part of
the energy of activation was the energy needed to create
'' holes'' in the three-dimensional rubber network. * The energy
• The theory of holes in the rubber substance agrees with the model of a
rubber polymer given in Fig. 140.
27-2
420 PERMEATION, SOLUTION, DIFFUSION OF GASES
* These values of E are approximate since they include the small temperature
coefficient of solubility.
and if n = 1, D
The transition state theory of reaction velocities may be
applied to diffusion systems, the expression for D being (67):
k __ e-AH±/RTeAS±/R_
h
or
h J Fn h
so that
TABLE 110. Mean free paths calculated using various formulae for D and assuming v = 2-5 x 1012 seer1
hT F*
D J
System Do (cm.2 sec."1) E (cal./mol.)
> lM£r)dt 2)0=2.72^-9- d*
H2-butadiene-acrylonitrile 56 8,700 d = 1160A. (2=480 A.
polymer d / ^ = 182A.
n
N2-butadiene-acrylonitrile 28 11,500 820 316 130 H
M
H2-neoprene 9-4 9,250 476 204 74 O
A-neoprene 55 11,700 1150 410 185
N2-neoprene 78 11,900 1370 490 215
N2- butadiene- methyl- metha- 37 11,500 946 350 150
crylate interpolymer
H2O in D2O 0197 5,300 69 36 11
C6H6OH in CH8OH 3-4 xlO" 3 3,150 91 6-9 1-4 CO
M
C6H5OH in C«H6 316 x 10- 8 3,080 8-7 6-9 14 o
S-C2H2Br4 in S-C2H2C14 1-68 xlO~ 8 3,365 6-4 50 1-0
Br2 in CS2 0-43 x 10- 8 1,540 3-2 3-4 0-4
CO
MODELS FOR DIFFUSION IN RUBBER 425
±
A8 ifit were all due to the diffusing molecule would corre-
spond to more than its entropy of solution(33). Thus the
medium itself must share in the entropy change, and so both
kinetic theory and transition state theory lead to the same
viewpoint: that the activation energy is shared in part or
9
where v =2-5 x 1018.
liquids. !cn
r \mtals.
/ ^ glasses
-J /*f Oo.
. 147. Periodicity curve for Do in D = D^RT for activated diffusions.
O Rubbers; x crystals and metals; + glasses; 0 liquids; Q surface
diffusions.
REFERENCES
(1) Carson, F. Bur. Stand. J. Res.,'Wash.,.12, 567 (1934).
(2) Dewar, J. Proc. Roy. Instn, 21, 813 (1914-16).
(3) Daynes, H. Proc. Roy. Soc. 97 A, 286 (1920).
(4) Schumacher, E. and Ferguson, L. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 49, 427
(1927).
(5) Rayleigh, Lord. Proc. Roy. Soc. 156 A, 350 (1936).
(6) Edwards, J. and Pickering, S. Sci. Pap. U.S. Bur. Stand. 16,
327 (1920).
(7) E.g. Benton, A. F. Industr. Engng Chem. 11, 623 (1919).
Buckingham, E. Tech. Pap. Bur. Stand. 14 (T 183) (1920).
Doughty, R., Seborg, C. and Baird, P. Tech. Asa. Papers, 15, 287
(1932).
Emanueli, L. Paper Tr. J. 85 (TS 98) (1927).
Gallagher, F. Paper, 33, 5 (1924).
(8) E.g. Barr, G. J. Text. Inst. 23, 206 (1932).
Marsh, M. J. Text. Inst. 22 (T 56) (1931).
(9) Schiefer, H. and Best, A. Bur. Stand. J. Res., Wash., 6, 51 (1931).
428 PERMEATION, SOLUTION, DIFFUSION OF GASES
(10) Mathieu, M. La Nitration de la Cellulose, Actualites Scientifiques,
No. 316. Paris, 1936.
(11) Trillat, J. J. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 197, 1616 (1933).
(12) McBain, J. W. Sorption of Gases and Vapours by Solids, Figs.
110 and 111. Routledge, 1932.
(13) Sheppard, S. E. and Newsome, P. T. J. phys. Chem. 39, 143
(1935).
(14) Hagedorn, M. and Moeller, P. Veroff. ZentLab. Anilin. photogr.
AbU 1, 144 (1930).
(15) Astbury, W. and Woods, H. Nature, Lond., IIS, 913, Fig. 1
(1930).
(16) Bernal, J., Fankuchen, I. and Perutz, M. Nature, Lond., 141,
523 (1938).
(17) E.g. de Boer, J. H. Trans, Faraday Soc. 32, 10 (1936).
(18) Mark, H. and Meyer, K. Der Aufbau der Hochpolymeren
Organischen Naturstojfe. Leipzig, 1930.
(19) Meyer, K. Kolloidzschr. 53, 8 (1930).
(20) Siefriz, W. Protoplasma, 21, 129 (1934).
(21) Frey-Wyssling, A. Protoplasma, 25, 262 (1936).
(22) Guth, E. and Rogowin, S. S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, na, 145, 531
(1936).
(23) Clews, C. B. andSchosberger, F. Proc. Roy. Soc. 164A, 491 (1938).
(24) Sauter, E. Z. phys. Chem. 36B, 405, 427 (1937).
(25) Staudinger, H. Ber. dtsch. Chem. Ges. 62B, 2893 (1929).
(26) Staudinger, H. and Husemann, E. Ber. dtsch. Chem. Ges. 68B,
1691 (1935).
(27) Staudinger, H., Heuer, W. and Husemann, E. Trans. Faraday
Soc. 32, 323 (1936).
(28) Graham, T. Phil. Mag. 32, 401 (1866).
(29) Wroblewski, S. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 8, 29 (1879).
(30) Hufner, G. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 34, 1 (1888).
(31) Reychler, A. J. Chim. phys. 8, 617 (1910).
(32) Kanata, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan, 3, 183 (1928).
(33) Barrer, R. Trans. Faraday Soc. 35, 628, 644 (1939).
(34) Sager, T. P. Bur. Stand. Res., Wash., 19, 181 (1937).
(35) Martin, S. and Patrick, J. Industr. Engng Chem. 28, 1144
(1936).
(35a) Barrer, R. Trans. Faraday Soc. 36, 644 (1940).
(36) Sager, T. P. Bur. Stand. J. Res., Wash., 13, 879 (1934).
(37) de Boer, J. H. and Fast, J. Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bos, 57, 317
(1938).
(38) Kayser, H. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 43, 544 (1891).
(39) Barr, G. Tech. Rep. Adv. Comm. Aero., Lond. (ref. by fa.
Daynes (3)).
(40) Shakespear, G. Unpublished (ref. by H. Daynes (3)).
(41) Shakespear, G., Daynes, H. and Lambourn. A brief account of
some Experiments on the Permeability of Balloon Fabrics to Air.
Adv. Comm. for Aeronautics (ref. by H. Daynes (3)).
REFERENCES 429
(42) Taylor, R., Herrmann, D. and Kemp, A. Industr. Engng Chem.
28, 1255 (1936).
(43) Barrer, R. M. Nature, Lond., 140, 107 (1937); Trans. Faraday
Soc. 34, 849 (1938).
(44) Meyer, O. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 127, 253 (1866).
(45) E.g. Knudsen, M. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 41, 289 (1913).
(46) Clausing, P. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 7, 489, 569 (1930).
(47) E.g. Buckingham, E. Tech. Pap. Bur. Stand. T 183 (1920-21).
(48) E.g. Thomson, W. Sci. Papers, 2, 681, 711. Cambridge, 1890.
(49) Carson, F. Bur. Stand. J. Res., Wash., 12, 587 (1934).
(50) Edwards, R. J. Soc. Leath. Tr. Chem. 14, 392 (1930).
(51) Bergmann, M. and Ludewig, S. J. Soc. Leath. Tr. Chsm. 13, 279
(1929).
(52) Bergmann, k . J. Soc. Leath. Tr. Chem. 12, 170 (1928).
(53) Wilson, J. and Lines, Q. Industr. Engng Chem. 17, 570 (1925).
(54) McBain, J. W. The Sorption of Oases and Vapours by Solids.
Routledge, 1932.
(55) Barrer, R. M. Phil. Mag. 28, 148 (1939).
(56) Trans. Faraday Soc. 36, 1235 (1940).
(57) Venable, C. and Fuwa, T. Industr. Engng Chem. 14, 139 (1922).
(58) Tammann, G. and Bochow, K. Z. anorg. Chem. 168, 263 (1928).
(59) Kohman, G. J. phys. Chem. 33, 226 (1929).*
(60) Bekkedahl, N. Bur. Stand. J. Res., Wash., 13, 411 (1934).
(61) Horiuti,J. Sci. Pap. Inst. phys. chem. Res., Tokyo, 17,125 (1931).
Lannung, "A. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 52, 68 (1930).
(62) Bell, R. P. Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 496 (1937).
(62a) Barrer, R. and Skirrow, G. J. Polymer Sci. 3, 564 (1948).
(626) Barrer, R. M. J. chem. Soc. p. 378 (1934).
(63) Tiselius, A. Z. phys. Chem. 169 A, 425 (1934).
(64) Ewell, R. H. J. appl. Phys. 9, 252 (1938).
(65) Wheeler, T. S. Trans. Nat. Inst. Sci. India, 1, 333 (1938).
(66) Bradley, R. S. Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 1185 (1937).
(67) Eyring, H. J. chem. Phys. 4, 283 (1936).
(68) Wynne-Jones, W. F. and Eyring, H. J. chem. Phys. 3, 492
(1935).
(69) Polanyi, M. and Wigner, E. Z. phys. Chem. 139A, 439 (1928).
(70) Moelwyn-Hughes, E. A. Kinetics of Reactions in Solutions,
chap, iv, p. 439 (1933).
CHAPTER X
-UK
p,= 23-6 MM.Hg
P2»OOMM.H 9
p, = 7-66 MM.Hg
P2=0O MM.Hg
-«-
22
20
r Jt
? « f
a
* 18
| 14 / / JI
| 12 i\l
$ 10 It I I——
6
Ih
// —
SVTTA P
RCHJ
'
BLE COfi WNC
|
—FILL! 0 CC UNO ds)UO
1
t«25O*C.
'CO MN
1 1 I
8 12 16 20 23 6
VAPOR PRESSURE p, IN MM.Hg
O-2O 0-40 O-60 0-90 100
RELATIVE VAPOR PRE5SURC
35 2
1-30 /
/ •oio
<A/
MO st jre abso rption.-v / 005
^« *••
1*20 /
S-is ir
-M tur e f en »tr atiOft
|
T
10 20 30 40 50 00 70 60 90 100
Fig. 152. The influence of varying the water-vapour pressure upon the quantity
sorbed and upon the permeation velocity through aluminium paints (io>.
1
U— THESE DOTTEO LINES REPRESENT LAYERS
1 | IN THE EXPERIMENTAL SAMPLE
1 I 1 1 l
1 1 1 1 I i
\ 1 1 i
1 - ACTUAL DISTRIBUTION Of WATER
(EXPERIMENTAL VALUES)
1 T 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1
V ""^
1 1
-CALCULATED FROM PRESSURE VS.
CONCENTRATION DATA OF
j
JS 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
I 1
«O «0 00 100 120
THICKNESS IN MILS
2M ?2 W 14 12 10 tt • 2 0
•
WET SIOE
VAPOR PRESSURE IN MM.H9 t
ORY StOE
or SAMPLE OF SAMPLE
Fig. 153.
Experimental details
Type of membrane 106 x per- Reference Moisture Temp. Pressure Thickness
meabihty gradient °C. difference given
mm.Hg or not
Moisture-proofed group:
Waxed paper 0-58-1730 Thomas and Reboulet(35) 100h-S-A-CaCl2 30 31-9 No
3-45-62*3 Birdseye(29> W-A-S-A-CaCla 38 50-6 No
3-60-202 Hyden<30) W-A-S-A-H2SO4 38 49-2 No
14-4 Tressler and Evers<32) W-A-S-50h - 1 4 , 21 9-3 No
21-6-260 Abrams and Chilson U4) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 No
23-244 Abrams and Brabender(33> W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 No
Waxed glassine 4-9-105 Birdseye (29) W-A-S-A-CaCl2 38 50-6 No
Miscellaneous water- 115-115 Tressler and Evers(32) W-A-S-50h - 1 4 , 21 9-3 No
proofed papers 576 Staedel(i8) W-A-S-65h 20 61 No
Synthetic resins group:
Aluminium paints 0-068-2-12 Wray and van Vorstd2) 95h-S-A-Al2O8 27 25-4 Yes
0-076-2-9 Edwards and WrayOG) 95h-S-A-Al2O8 27 25 Yes
101-374 Hunt and Lansing (17) 95h-S-A-Al2O3 27 25 No
Varnishes, lacquers, 0-26-9-4 Kline (2) W-A-S-65h 21 to 38 6 to 14 Yes
aircraft finishes
Cellulose and cellulose
corn/pound group: 0-41 21 to 25 6 to 24 Yes
Plasticised cellulose Taylor, Herrmann and Kemp <<»> W-A-S-A-Oh
acetate
Cellulose acetate 0-58-28-8 Tressler and Everso?) W-A-S-50h - 1 4 , 21 9-3 No
54 Taylor, Herrmann and Kemp <9> W-A-S-A-Oh 21 to 25 6 to 24 Yes
317 Abrams and Brabender(33) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 No
634 Abrams and Chilson U4> W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 No
24-5 Levey (28) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 Yes
8-1-4-5 Wosnessenski and Dubnikowdi) High h-S-Low h 20 14-9 Yes
Cellulose nitrate 20-86-3 Wing oi) W-S-A-CaCl2 40 55-4 No
5-4 Levey (28) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 Yes
4-5 Wosnessenski and Dubnikowd3) High h-S-Low h 20 17-6 Yes
Cellulose ethers 3-6 Taylor, Herrmann and Kemp (9) W-A-S-A-Oh 21 to 25 6 to 24 Yes
7-2-151 Levey (28) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 Yes*
See foot of Table, p. 442, for key to column four.
TABLE 116 (continued)
Experimental details
^ype of membrane 10* x per- Reference Pressure Thickness
meability Moisture Temp. difference given
gradient °C. mm. Hg or not
Cellulose and cellulose
compound group:
Regenerated cellulose 546 Birdseye(29) W-A-S-A-CaCl2 38 50-6 No
560 Charch and Scroggie <i5> W-A-S-lh 40 5-3 No
965 Abrams and Chilson(H) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 No
33 Levey (28) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 Yes
1655 Gregory (36) W-A-S-63h 38,21 37 No
3240 StaedeldS) W-A-S-65h 20 61 No
5190 Trillat arid Matricon(37) lOOh-S-V-Oh 20 17-5 No
Paper 1050 Abrams and Chilsonu*) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 No
1070 Abrams and Brabender(33) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 No
29 Levey (28) W-A-S-50h, 21 9-3 Yes
1800-3600 StaedeldS) W-A-S-65h 20 61 No
Vegetable parchment 25 l^evey(28) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 Yes
360 Birdseye(29) W-A-S-A-CaCl2 38 50-6 No
Glassine 23-4 Levey (28) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 Yes
504 Fabel(si) W-A-S-A-CaCl2 30 32 No
680 Abrams and ChilsonvH) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 No
806 Abrams and Brabender(33 W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 No
Various membranes:
Leather 14-4 Edwards (38) High h-S-Low h 15 to 21 6 to 17 No
72-1440 Wilson and Lines (20) W-A-S-A-H2SO4 5 to 45 0to72 No
Textile fabrics 45-3 Levey (28) W-A-S-50h 21 9-3 Yes
1080-1510 Sale and Hedrick(39) W-A-S-65h 38,21 37 No
1440 Barr (40) W-A-S-Warm air 35 37 No
1650-1870 Gregory (36) W-A-S-63h 38,21 37 No
Copper gauze 1730 Gregory (36) W-A-S-63h 38,21 37 No
Open cell 3140-19,700 Abrams and Chilson(i4) — — —
3620 Levey (28) — — —
4840 Gregory (36) — — — —
The key to column four is: W = water surface. A = air space. V ~ evacuated space.
S = specimen. h=
PERMEABILITY CONSTANTS 443
ot ox
(see also p. 47) should be used in such systems. However, it
has been customary to employ" the simpler law, and to use
slabs of leather (42), rubber (2), bakelite(48) or cellulose deri-
vatives (46) in computing the diffusion constants D. A suitable
solution is then
444 PERMEATION AND DIFFUSION OF VAPOURS
1
iNCtICAS4 Mr
1-00 TMI CKNE ES IS
—— — —o
f\.Of\
0-50
V1
0*30
0-20
0-10
1
0
2Q 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 .260 280 300 320 340 360 380
T I M E (M!N.)
Fig. 154. Curves of relative sorption against time for water-acetyl cellulose
systems (46>. The form of the curve yf- against t is dependent on the mem-
Hfoo
brane thickness.
On the other hand, in non-rigid swelling membranes of
rubber (47) or cellulose acetate (Fig. 154) the departures were
considerable.
The sorption velocity of water in rubber samples increases
as the temperature rises. The amount sorbed after a period of
20 hr. (#20) I s given below for a typical case:
Temp. ° C. Amount sorbed in 20 hr. {Q20)
24 00110
60 00265
70 00390
100 0-079
* When ^ - > 0 - 4 , all terms in 0 save the first can be neglected, so giving
H»0O
a linear plot of In ( l - -~-\ against t. Also, for ^—<0-6, the full equation can be
Q
well approximated by ^— =
SORPTION KINETICS IN ORGANIC SOLIDS 445
inside and outside the membrane. The law was then for-
mulated as dC d%
n
TIME
but in the more complex case by the parameter 6' = —=- -^r.
nD^ on,
Because dC/dh, and therefore d', increase rapidly at high
humidity, sorption must proceed more and more slowly as
humidity increases, or saturation is approached. In desorption,
as humidity decreases, the converse is true, i.e. the desorption
velocity steadily increases. The first prediction was fulfilled
when water was sorbed by vulcanised and unvulcanised
rubber(54,8), gutta-percha, and paragutta(54); and the second
VAPOURS OTHER THAN WATER 447
A B
Fig. 157. A. Section of cell of native cellulose.
B. Section of cell of hydrated cellulose.
The fr-axis is perpendicular to the plane of the diagram.
REFERENCES
(1) Carson, F. Misc. Publ. U.S. Bur. Stand. M. 127 (1937).
(2) Kline, G. Bur. Stand. J. Res., Wash., 18, 235 (1937).
(3) Boggs, C. and Blake, J. Industr. Engng Chem. 18, 224 (1926).
(4) For a summary of the data see J. W. McBain, The Sorption of
Gases and Vapours by Solids, chap. XH. Routledge, 1932.
(5) McBain, J. W. The Sorption of Gases and Vapours by Solids,
p. 372. Routledge, 1932.
(6) Lowry, H. and Kohman, G. J. phys. Chem. 31, 23 (1927).
(7) Kubelka, V. Kolloidzschr. 51, 331-6 (1930); also M. Bergmann,
J. Soc. Leath. Tr. Chem. 14, 307 (1930).
(8) E.g. Daynes, H. Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 531 (1937).
(9) Taylor, R., Herrmann, D. and Kemp, A. Industr. Engng Chem.
28, 1255 (1936).
(10) Schumacher* E. and Ferguson, L. Industr. Engng Chem. 21, 159
(1929).
(11) Wing, H. Industr. £ngng Chem. 28, 786 (1936).
(12) Wray, R. and van Vorst, A. Industr. Engng Chem. 25, 842 (1933).
(13) Wosnessenski, S. and Dubnikow, L. M. Kolloidzschr. 74, 183
(1936).
(14) Abrams, A. and Chilson, W. Paper Tr. J. 91, T.S. 193 (1930).
(15) Charch, W. and Scroggie, A. G. Paper Tr. J. 101, T.S. 201
(1935).
(16) Edwards, J. and Wray, R. Industr. Engng Chem. 28, 549 (1936).
(17) Hunt, J. and Lansing, D. Industr. Engng Chem. 27, 26 (1935).
(18) Staedel, W. Papier Fabr. 31, 535 (1933).
(19) Stillwell, S. Tech. Pap. For. Prod. Res., Lond., 1 (publ. 1926-36).
(20) Wilson, J. and Lines, G. Industr. Engng Chem. 17, 570 (1925).
(21) Bergmann, M. J. Soc. Leath. Tr. Chem. 13, 161 (1929).
(22) Martley, J. Tech. Pap. For. Prod. Res., Lond., 2 (publ. 1926-36).
(23) Sager, T. P. Bur. Stand. J. Res., Wash., 19, 181 (1937).
(24) Schroeder, P. N. Z. phys. Chem. 45, 76 (1903).
(25) Daynes, H. Proc. Roy. Soc. 97A, 286 (1920).
(26) Bergmann, M. and Ludewig, S. J. Soc. Leath. Tr. Chem. 13, 279
(1929).
(27) Edwards, J. and Pickering, S. Sci. Pap. Bur. Stand. 16, 327
(1920).
(28) Levey, H. Plastic Prod. 11, 52 (1934).
(29) Birdseye, C. Industr. Engng Chem. 21, 573 (1929).
(30) Hyden, W. Industr. Engng Chem. 21, 405 (1929).
REFERENCES 453
(31) Fabel, K. Kunstseide, 15, 383 (1933).
(32) Tressler, D. and Evers, C. Paper Tr. J. 101, T.S. 113 (1935).
(33) Abrams,A.andBrabender,G. Paper Tr.J. 102, T.S. 204(1936).
(34) Harvey, A. Paper Tr. J. 78, T.S. 256 (1924).
(35) Thomas, C. and Reboulet, H. Industr. Engng Chem. Anal, ed.,
2,390(1930).
(36) Gregory, J. J. Text. Inst. 21, T. 66 (1930).
(37) Trillat, J. and Matricon, M. J. chim. Phys. 32, 101 (1935).
(38) Edwards, R. J. Soc. Leath. Tr. Chem. 16, 439 (1932).
(39) Sale, P. and Hedrick, A. Bur. Stand. Tech. Paper, 18, 540(1924).
(40) Barr, G. Second Rep. Fabrics Co-ord. Res. Committee, D.S.I.R.
GtBrit.p. 113 (1930).
(41) Sager, T. P. Bur. Stand. J. Res. J., Wash., 13, 879 (1934).
(42) Bradley, H., McKay, A. and Worswick, B. J. Soc. Leath. Tr.
Chem. 13, 10, 87 (1929).
(43) Masson, O. and Richards, E. Proc. Roy. Soc. 78 A, 412 (1907).
(44) Hedges, J. Trans. Faraday Soc. 22, 178 (1926).
(45) Tech. Pap. For. Prod. Res., Lond., 1 and 2.
(46) Sheppard, S. and Newsome, P. J. phys. Chem. 34, i, 1160 (1930).
(47) Andrews, D. and Johnston, J. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 46, 640
(1924).
(48) Leopold, H. and Johnston, J. J. phys. Chem. 32, 876 (1928).
(49) Kirchof, F. Kolloidchem. Beih. 6, 1 (1914).
(50) Lundal, A. E. Ann. Phys., Lpz., 66, 741 (1898).
(51) Ostwald, W. Orundiss der KoUoidchemie, p. 370.
(52) Barrer, R. M. Trans. Faraday Soc. 35, 628 (1939).
(53) Trans. Faraday Soc. 35, 644 (1939).
(54) Daynes, H. India Rubb. J. 84, 376 (1932).
(55) Fry, J. India Rubb. J. 73, 513 (1927).
(56) Cooper and Scott. Lab. Circ. Res. Ass. Brit. Rubber Manuf.
no. 65 (1930).
(57) Daynes, H. Rubber Tech. Conf., London, May 23-5, 1938.
(58) Dewar, J. Proc. Roy. Instn, 21, 813 (1914-16).
(59) Payne, H. and Gardner, W. Industr. Engng Chem. 299 893 (1937).
(60) Kahlenberg, L. J. phys. Chem. 10, 141 (1906).
(61) Sheppard, S. Trans. Faraday Soc. 29, 77 (1933).
(62) Bancroft, W. and Barnett, C. J. phys. Chem. 34, 449, 753, 1217,
2433 (1930).
(63) Meyer, K. and Mark, H. Ber. dtsch. chem. Ges. 61, 593 (1928).
(64) Alexejev, A. and Matalski, V. J. chim. Phys. 24, 737 (1927).
(65) Kirchof, F. Kolloidzschr. 35, 367 (1924).
(66) Stamberger, P. Kolloidzschr. 45, 239 (1928).
(67) Astbury, W. and Woods, H. J. Nature, Lond., 126, 913 (1930);
127, 663 (1931).
(68) Bernal, J., Fankuchen, I. and Perutz, M. Nature, Lond., 141,
528 (1938).
(69) Wilson, R. and Fuwa, T. Industr. Engng Chem. 14, 915(1922).
AUTHOR INDEX
Abrams, A. and Chilson, W., 432, Beetz, W., 240
436, 440, 441, 442 Bekkedahl, N., 417
— and Brabender, G., 440, 441, 442 Bell, R. P., 419
Ackerel, T., 57, 58 Bellati and Lussana, 144, 145
Adzumi, H., 60, 65, 66 Benton, A. F., 384
Alexejev, A. and Matalski, V., 450 -— and Elgin, J., 230
Alexejew, D. and Polukarew, O., 145, — and White, T., 230
204 Beran, O. and Quittner, F., 325
Alty, T., 117, 142, 375 Berg, W., 338
— and Clark, A., 369 Bergmann, M., 411, 438
Andrade, E., 316, 340, 342, 346 — and Ludewig, S., 409, 411
— and Martindale, J., 316 Bernal, J., 292
Andrews, D. and Johnston, J., 444 — Fankuchen, I. and Perutz, M.,
Andrews, M., 229, 329, 333 388, 451
— and Dushman, S., 329 Berthelot, M., 117
Appleyard, E., 314, 341, 343 Birdseye, C, 440, 441, 442
— and Lovell, A., 341, 343, 347 Blasins, H., 57, 58
Arkel, A. van, 241 Blythswoocl, Lord, and Allen, H. S., 88
Arnold, J. and M'William, A., 239 Bodenstein, M., 144, 201
Arrhenius, S., 240 — and Kranendieck, F., 117
Astbury, W. and Woods, H., 388, 451 Boer, J. H. de, 320, 389
Aten, A. and Zieren, M., 145, 203 — and Fast, J., 157, 158, 212, 400,
403, 419
Baedeker, K., 263 Boggs, C. and Blake, J., 430
Bancroft, W. and Barnett, C , 450 Boltzmann, L., 48
Bangham, D. and Fakhoury, N., 377 Borelius, G., 291
Bansen, H., 71 — and Lindblom, S., 161, 162, 168,
Barnes, C , 25 171, 176, 178, 201, 202
Barr, G., 384, 403, 442 Bose, E., 240
Barrer, R. M., 41, 87, 93, 105, 106, Bosworth, R. C , 44, 245, 341, 351,
117, 121, 122, 125, 126, 127, 129, 354,355, 364,366, 371, 373, 374, 376
130, 131, 137, 162, 168, 174, 177, Braaten, E. O. and Clark, G., 120,126,
178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 184, 188, 129, 168
194, 196, 199, 201, 203, 217, 218, Bradley, H., McKay, A. and Worswick,
221, 231, 233, 318, 333, 334, 346, B., 443
379, 393, 394, 396, 401, 403, 405, Bradley, R. S., 115, 299, 305, 422
407, 412, 413, 415, 416, 417, 419, Bragg, W., Sykes, C. and Bradley, A.,
425, 445 291
—- and Rideal, E. K., 87 Bramley, A., 164, 208, 224, 225, 241,
Bartell, F., 73 245, 275
— and Carpenter, D. C , 73 — and Allen, K., 226
— and Miller, F., 73 — and Beeby, G., 208, 224, 225, 241,
— and Osterhof, H., 73 245, 275
Barwich, H., 79 — and Heywood, F., 241, 245, 275
Baukloh, W. and Guthman, H., 196,234 — Heywood, F., Cooper, A. and
— and Kayser, H., 192, 193, 196, 198 Watts, J., 208, 224, 225, 241, 245,
Baumbach, H. v. and Wagner, C, 212, 275
249, 267, 312 — and Jinkings, A., 208, 224, 225,
Becker, J. A.,44,349,351,360,361, 368 241, 245, 275
Beebe, R., Low, G., Wildner, E. and — and Lawton, G., 208, 224, 241,
Goldwasser, S., 230 245, 275
AUTHOR INDEX 455
Bramley, A. and Lord, H., 208, 209, Damkohler, G., 87
224, 241, 245, 275 Darwin, C. G., 318
— and Turner, G., 208, 224, 241, 245, Daynes, H., 217, 383, 411, 412, 413,
275 417, 431, 445, 446, 447
Brattain, W. and Becker, J. A., 341, Deming, H. and Hendricks, B., 168,
349, 351, 361, 362, 363, 368 191, 334
Braunbek, W., 297, 305 Deubner, A., 340
Braune, H., 269, 272, 275, 285, 301 Deville, H. and Troost, L., 144
— and Kahn, 0., 274 Devonshire, A., 378
Bremond, P., 72 Dewar, J., 383, 402, 403, 405, 415, 447
Brick, M. and Philips, A., 241, 275 Diergarten, H., 239
Bridgman, P., 315 Dietl, A., 88
Brillouin, M., 55, 56 Ditchburn, R., 342
Brower, T., Larsen, B. and Schenk, Dixit, K. R., 346
W., 241 Doehlemann, E., 182
Briick, L., 340 Donnan, F., 65
Bruni, G. and Meneghini, D., 241 Dorn, J. and Harder, O., 297
— and Scarpa, G., 266 Doughty, R., Seborg, C. and Baird, P.,
Bryce, G., 230 384
Buckingham, E., 53, 58, 66, 384, 406 Dube, G., 375
Buerger, M. J., 318 Duhm, B., 220
Bugahow, W. and Rybalko, F., 278, Dunn, J., 241, 329, 332, 333
327, 331, 333 Dunwald, H. and Wagner, C, 212,
— and Breschnewa, N., 278 250, 252, 267, 312
Burmeister, W. and Schloetter, M., 227 Durau, F. and Schratz, V., 115
Burton, E., Braaten, E. O. and Dushman, S., Dennison, D. and
Wilhelm, J. O., 121, 129, 334 Reynolds, N., 275, 329, 333