Cm1-Lecture-Notes-Gk-2021 17 Nov
Cm1-Lecture-Notes-Gk-2021 17 Nov
Contents
1 Primer on vectors, polar coordinates and kinematics 1
1.1 Vectors, dot and cross product . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Position coordinates and velocity and acceleration vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.3 Uniform circular motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.4 Nonuniform circular motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1
• Vectors also make it easier to understand structural features (behavior
under rotations, symmetries, transformation laws) of physical quantities
and allow us to bring to bear tools from linear algebra and geometry.
• A nonzero vector v in 3d Euclidean space is a directed line segment
emanating from the origin. It has a magnitude or length denoted |v| = v
and a direction. Additionally there is one exceptional vector called the
zero vector 0 which has zero length; its direction is not defined. For some
purposes it is convenient to think of the zero vector as one that points in
all directions!
• A unit vector is one with unit length. E.g., given any nonzero vector
a, we have the associated unit vector â obtained by ‘normalization’, i.e.,
a
dividing it by its length: â = |a| . Conversely a = aâ. For a unit vector
|â| = 1.
• Examples of vectors include the position vector of a particle moving in
3d space, its velocity and acceleration, the force acting on the particle, the
electric field at a point in space etc.
• Vectors in 3d space form the real vector space R3 in which addition of
vectors is defined as is the multiplication of a vector by a real number.
• The multiplication of a vector v by the real number α denoted αv is
a vector in the same (or opposite) direction as v (according as α ≥ 0 or
α ≤ 0) that has the length |α||v|. For example − 12 v is a vector of half the
length that points in the direction opposite√to v . The real scalar α need
not be rational, it could be irrational like 2 or π . Moreover, 0v = 0 is
the zero vector.
• Pictorially, the sum of the vectors a and b may be obtained by con-
structing the diagonal of the parallelogram with adjacent sides a and b.
2
• Evidently, the order does not matter: a + b = b + a. We say that
addition of vectors is commutative or an abelian operation.
• The zero vector has the special property that 0 + v = v for any vector
v.
• The zero vector 0 is not the same as the real number 0. The former lies
at the chosen origin of 3d space while the latter is a point on the real line.
They live in different spaces.
• The space of vectors on the 2d Euclidean plane form the real vector space
denoted R2 .
Dot or scalar product. Geometry has to do with angles, lengths, notions
of parallel and perpendicular etc. Geometry enters through the dot product
of vectors. For two vectors in 3d space, we define their dot product as
a · b = ab cos θ where θ is the angle between the vectors.
• Notice that a · b = b · a, so the dot product is commutative.
• Turning things around, the angle between vectors can be expressed in
terms of the dot product θ = arccos( a·b
ab ).
• As a consequence of the definition, a · a = a2 . Thus the length of a
vector can also be expressed in terms of the dot product.
• The dot product is also called the scalar product since the result is a
real number (scalar) and not a vector.
• Show the law of cosines for c = a + b:
c2 = a2 + b2 + 2ab cos θ. (1)
3
√
• The norm ||v|| of a vector v is defined as ||v|| = v · v . The norm is
the length of the vector, it is ≥ 0. The zero vector is the only one with
zero norm.
• Work as a scalar product. Suppose a constant force F acts on a
particle and displaces it by the vector s. Then the work done is F · s.
4
• The area of a parallelogram spanned by the vectors a and b is equal to
|a × b| = |b × a|.
5
dicular:
x̂ · x̂ = ŷ · ŷ = ẑ · ẑ = 1 and x̂ · ŷ = ŷ · ẑ = ẑ · x̂ = 0. (2)
The (x̂, ŷ, ẑ) frame is called right-handed if x̂ × ŷ = ẑ (rather than −ẑ , in
which case it is left-handed). What are ŷ × ẑ and ẑ × x̂? We will work
with right-handed frames.
• x̂, ŷ and ẑ form a basis for R3 in the sense that they are linearly inde-
pendent and any vector can be written (uniquely) as a linear combination
of them:
a = ax x̂ + ay ŷ + az ẑ. (3)
The three real numbers ax , ay and az are the components of a along the
three coordinate axes, verify that
ax = a · x̂, ay = a · ŷ and az = a · ẑ. (4)
• Notice that ax x̂ = Px̂ a is the projection of a along x̂. We say that the
vector has been resolved into its components and written as a sum of its
orthogonal projections along the orthonormal basis vectors.
• In fact, (ax , ay , az ) are the Cartesian coordinates of the location of the
tip of the vector a.
• Express the Cartesian components of the cross product a × b in terms
of those of a and b.
6
1.2 Position coordinates and velocity and acceleration vectors
• The vector that points from the origin of Cartesian coordinates to the
instantaneous position of the particle, has components (x(t), y(t), z(t)). It
is called the position vector and is denoted r(t). While such a designation
is convenient for some purposes, it is important to bear in mind that the
location of a particle is not really a vector: it is not physically associated to
a direction and the location of the particle does not come with any intrinsic
notion of an origin.
• The infinitesimal displacement of a particle over a time [t, t + δt] does
define a vector, albeit a vector with infinitesimal length:
7
The concept of infinitesimal displacement defines an origin, namely the
initial location of the particle (at time t). The infinitesimal displacement
vector then points from this origin to the final location of the particle (at
time t + δt).
• The concept of infinitesimal displacement does not define a coordinate
frame, it only defines an origin and a vector δr . We may resolve δr along
the axes of any frame. Here, we will parallel transport δr to the origin of
our Cartesian coordinate frame, its components with respect to this frame
are
δr(t) = r(t+δt)−r(t) = (x(t+δt)−x(t), y(t+δt)−y(t), z(t+δt)−z(t)) (6)
8
location of the particle. With this understanding,
v(t) = (ẋ(t), ẏ(t), ż(t)) = ẋx̂ + ẏ ŷ + ż ẑ (9)
9
resulting in an angular speed of ω radians per second (angular speed is
sometimes called angular frequency).
• Notice that v · r = 0. Thus, the velocity vector is tangent to the circle.
The acceleration is given by
We see that the acceleration has the constant magnitude |a(t)| = `ω 2 and
points radially inwards towards the center of the circle. The latter feature
justifies the name centripetal acceleration. Centripetal means ‘seeking the
center’ in Latin.
r(t) = `(cos θ(t), sin θ(t)) = `(cos θ(t)x̂ + sin θ(t)ŷ). (14)
10
If we denote ω(t) = θ̇, then the angular speed of such a particle is |ω(t)| =
|θ̇|, which we suppose is not constant.
• The velocity of such a particle is
v(t) = `θ̇(− sin θ(t), cos θ(t)). (15)
Notice that v · r = 0. So v always points tangent to the circle as it must
for a particle confined to the circle. However, the speed `|θ̇| may vary with
time.
• The acceleration is given by
a = v̇ = `θ̈(− sin θ, cos θ) − `θ̇2 (cos θ, sin θ). (16)
The first term points tangentially, and is called the angular acceleration
while the second term points radially inwards and is called the centripetal
acceleration. Thus a · v 6= 0 in general for nonuniform circular motion.
• Then
|∆A| = |2A sin(∆θ/2)| ≈ A|∆θ| for small ∆θ. (17)
11
We have used the linear Taylor approximation for the sine function (more
on this soon). Taking the limit ∆t → 0,
dA
= A dθ .
dt dt (18)
As we will soon learn, if the forces on a particle are known, then one
may use Newton’s second law to find its acceleration. This is called the
dynamical part of the problem of motion, since it depends on the forces and
interactions. The kinematical part of the problem of motion is to determine
the velocity of the particle and its trajectory from its acceleration.
• Suppose we are given the acceleration of a particle. Then the velocity
must satisfy dv
dt = a(t). Integrating this equation with respect to time from
t0 to t, we get Z t
v(t) = v(t0 ) + a(t0 )dt0 . (20)
t0
In addition to knowledge of the acceleration, here we needed an ‘initial
condition’ v(t0 ) (actually three ICs, the three Cartesian components of
v(t0 )) to determine the velocity. The problem of determining velocity has
12
been reduced to quadratures i.e., to evaluating integrals (one each for the
three Cartesian components of velocity).
• The step from velocity to position involves one more integration and
another initial condition:
Z t
ṙ(t) = v(t) ⇒ r(t) = r(t0 ) + v(t0 )dt0 . (21)
t0
13
the counterclockwise angle the radius vector r = (x, y) makes with the
horizontal axis. Note that x and y are called the abscissa and ordinate of
the point P . In other words, cos θ = x/r or tan θ = y/x. Thus,
p
r = x2 + y 2 and θ = arctan(y/x) = arccos(x/r). (25)
Conversely,
x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ. (26)
14
• Unit vectors r̂ and θ̂. Recall that at a point (x, y) on the plane, x̂ and
ŷ are unit vectors in the directions of increasing x holding y fixed and vice
versa. Similarly, we define the unit vectors r̂ and θ̂ at any point (r, θ).
r̂ points radially outwards while θ̂ points counterclockwise tangentially
to the circle of radius r. The direction in which θ̂ points is called the
azimuthal direction.
• x̂, ŷ furnish one basis for vectors at any point on the plane. Similarly,
r̂, θ̂ furnish another basis at points away from r = 0. We can therefore
expand r̂ and θ̂ in the x̂, ŷ basis.
• A figure shows that we may decompose r̂ and θ̂ as
x y
r̂ = cos θ x̂ + sin θ ŷ = x̂ + ŷ
r r
y x
and θ̂ = − sin θ x̂ + cos θ ŷ = − x̂ + ŷ. (27)
r r
r̂ · θ̂ = 0 and r̂ · r̂ = θ̂ · θ̂ = 1. (28)
15
• Position coordinate and velocity vector. The position vector can
now be expressed in polar coordinates.
We wish to find the velocity and acceleration vectors in plane polar co-
ordinates. These are the polar coordinate analogues of v = ẋx̂ + ẏ ŷ and
a = ẍx̂ + ÿ ŷ .
• Now, suppose r(t) = r(t)r̂(t) is the position of a particle at time t. As
it moves along a trajectory, the radial coordinate r can change, but so can
the unit vector r̂(t). Thus, its velocity is given by
dr̂
v(t) = ṙ(t) = ṙ r̂ + r . (30)
dt
ṙr̂ is what we might naively guess as the radial velocity. The other term
comes from the change in direction of the basis vector r̂.
• Let us take a moment to find the rates of change of the basis unit vectors
r̂ and θ̂. Being unit vectors, their change can come only from a change in
their direction. For instance,
dr̂
r̂ = cos θx̂ + sin θŷ ⇒ = − sin θ θ̇ x̂ + cos θ θ̇ ŷ = θ̇θ̂, (31)
dt
where we recalled that θ̂ = − sin θx̂ + cos θŷ .
• Thus, the change in r̂ is always in the azimuthal θ̂ direction. Neither
the magnitude nor the direction of r̂ changes in the radial direction. Un-
derstand this through the figure
• Similarly,
dθ̂
θ̂ = − sin θx̂ + cos θŷ ⇒ = − cos θ θ̇ x̂ − sin θ θ̇ ŷ = −θ̇ r̂. (32)
dt
16
The rate of change of θ̂ always points radially.
17
1.8 Spherical polar coordinates
• If P has position vector r relative to the origin, then the polar angle θ
is the angle r makes with respect to the upward vertical z axis. Thus θ =
arccos(z/r). Notice that 0 ≤ θ ≤ π with θ = 0 and θ = π corresponding
to the positive and negative z axis.
18
we could introduce another set of coordinates that work in the excluded
region.]
• Alternatively, we may write
z = r cos θ, x = r sin θ cos φ and y = r sin θ sin φ. (36)
p
Check that tan θ = x2 + y 2 /z .
• The position vector of a particle located at (x, y, z) is then given by
r = xx̂ + y ŷ + z ẑ = rr̂.
• The other formulae we derived for plane polar coordinates may be gen-
eralized to spherical polar coordinates.
• For instance, if r̂, θ̂, φ̂ are the unit vectors in the directions of increasing
r, θ, φ, then the figure helps us express
r̂ = cos θẑ + sin θ(cos φx̂ + sin φŷ),
θ̂ = − sin θẑ + cos θ(cos φx̂ + sin φŷ) and
φ̂ = − sin φx̂ + cos φŷ. (37)
• Taylor series for one variable. Given a function of one real variable
f (x) that is continuous and hopefully differentiable a few times, we are
interested in approximately evaluating it in the neighborhood of a point
x0 .
• By continuity, f (x) ≈ f (x0 ) is of course our zeroth order approximation
to the value of the function for x near x0 .
• The next possibility is to approximate f by a linear function near x0 .
It is natural to take the slope of this linear function to be the derivative of
19
f at x0 (assuming f is differentiable at x0 ), so that we approximate the
graph of f by the tangent through the point (x0 , f (x0 )). This leads to the
first order or linear Taylor approximation
20
series converges to the function in some domain is said to be real analytic
or of type C ω .
• For example, show that the Taylor series for 1/(1 − x) around x = 0 is
given by a geometric series:
1
= 1 + x + x2 + · · · . (40)
1−x
This series converges to 1/(1 − x) for |x| < 1. Also verify that (1 − x)(1 +
x + x2 + · · · ) = 1 by multiplying things out and canceling. Note that
1/(1 − x) does not admit a Taylor expansion around x = 1.
• Show that the Taylor series for ex , is given by
x x2 xn
e =1+x+ + ··· + + ··· . (41)
2! n!
This series has an infinite radius of convergence. Find the Taylor series for
sin x and cos x.
• The binomial series is a very useful Taylor series around x = 0:
ν(ν − 1) 2 ν(ν − 1)(ν − 2) 3
(1 + x)ν = 1 + νx + x + x + ··· (42)
1·2 1·2·3
which converges for |x| < 1 and any (real or complex) number ν . For a
positive integer ν = n, this series terminates and we recover the binomial
expansion with coefficients given by combinatorial factors: (1 + x)n =
P n n r
r=0 r x .
• In particular, show that
1 x x2
√ =1− + + ··· . (43)
1+x 2 8
• Taylor series for more variables. For a real function f (x, y) of two
variables, we have the Taylor expansion of f around a point (x0 , y0 ):
∂f ∂f
f (x, y) = f (x0 , y0 ) + |(x0 ,y0 ) (x − x0 ) + |(x ,y ) (y − y0 )
2 ∂x ∂y 0 0
2
∂2f ∂2f
1 ∂ f 2 ∂ f 2
+ (x − x0 ) + 2 (y − y0 ) + (x − x0 )(y − y0 ) + (y − y0 )(x − x0 ) + (44)
···
2 ∂x2 ∂y ∂x∂y ∂y∂x
where all the partial derivatives are evaluated at (x0 , y0 ). The mixed sec-
∂2f ∂2f
ond partials ∂x∂y and ∂y∂x are equal (Clairaut’s or Schwarz’s Theorem,
assuming the second partials are continuous).
21
• To calculate a partial derivative with respect to y we simply differentiate
the function with respect to y treating x as fixed.
• One way to obtain this series is to treat y as fixed and first write down
a Taylor series in x around x0 with coefficients being functions of y . Then
we expand these coefficients in a Taylor series in y .
• Calculate the mixed second partials of f (x, y) = cos xy and show that
they are both equal to − sin xy − xy cos xy
• In figure, we have displayed three vector fields on the plane. Since such
a vector field has two components in Cartesian coordinates, a vector field
on the plane may be regarded as a map from R2 → R2 . If x and y are
22
the horizontal and vertical directions, then the first vector field is plausibly
v ∝ x̂. The second vector field points radially outwards with a magnitude
increasing with radial distance and is circularly symmetric. It is plausible
that the 2nd vector field v ∝ xx̂ + y ŷ = r . The 3rd vector field could be
the velocity vector field of a steadily flowing fluid.
• Gradient of a scalar field. Given a scalar field φ(r), its gradient
is a kind of derivative that produces a vector field denoted ∇φ(r). In
Cartesian coordinates r = (x, y, z),
∂φ ∂φ ∂φ
grad φ = ∇φ(r) = x̂ + ŷ + ẑ. (45)
∂x ∂y ∂z
• Example 1: If φ(x, y) = x then ∇φ = x̂ is a constant vector field
pointing in the x direction at all points of R2 .
• Example 2: If φ = 21 (x2 + y 2 + z 2 ), then
∇φ = xx̂ + y ŷ + z ẑ = rr̂ (46)
is a radially outward pointing vector field on R3 , with magnitude equal to
the distance from the origin.
• At any location r , ∇φ is a vector that points in the direction of most
rapid increase of φ. For a vector field v = ∇φ on the plane, ∇φ must
point orthogonally to the level curves (or equipotentials if φ is regarded as
a potential function) of φ, since φ is constant along its level curves. For
φ(x, y) = x, the level curves are lines parallel to the y axis, and ∇φ = x̂
points perpendicular to these lines. For a vector field on R3 , v = ∇φ must
point perpendicular to the level surfaces of φ. For φ = 12 (x2 + y 2 + z 2 ), the
level surfaces are concentric spheres centered at the origin and ∇φ = r is
perpendicular to these surfaces.
• Line integral. Given a vector field v(r) = (vx , vy , vz )(r) in 3d space
and a parametrized curve γ(t) = (x(t), y(t), z(t)) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, we may
define the ‘line integral’ of v along γ as the real number
Z Z 1 Z 1
dγ dx dy dz
v · dγ = v· dt = vx + vy + vz dt. (47)
γ 0 dt 0 dt dt dt
• Here, γ̇ = dγ
dt = ẋx̂ + ẏ ŷ + ż ẑ is a vector field along the curve γ (it is
not defined elsewhere in R3 ).
23
• For example, if γ is the helix (cos t, sin t, t), then dγ = (− sin t, cos t, 1)dt.
We may consider dγ as the differential of the map γ : [0, 1] → R3 .
• The work done by a force field F (r) in moving a particle
R along a curve
γ is an important example of a line integral: WF (γ) = γ F · dγ .
• In general, the line integral depends on the values of v all along the
curve γ . However, if v is the gradient of a scalar, v = ∇φ, then the line
integral can be evaluated in terms of the values of φ at the endpoints:
Z Z 1
∂φ dx ∂φ dy ∂φ dz
∇φ · dγ = + + dt
γ 0 ∂x dt ∂y dt ∂z dt
Z 1
dφ(r(t))
= dt = φ(r(1)) − φ(r(0)). (48)
0 dt
Here, we viewed φ(x(t), y(t), z(t)) as a function of t and used the chain
rule to differentiate it wite respect to t.
• In particular, if γ is a closed curve, then r(0) = r(1) and the line integral
of a gradient vanishes I
∇φ · dγ = 0. (49)
γ
H
Here denotes a line integral around a closed contour.
24
work done by a conservative force field ∇φ depends only on the initial and
final locations of the particle, and not on the rest of the details of the path
taken. A conservative force field does no work in moving a particle around
a closed curve.
25
future of an event that occurs at time t0 consists of all events that occur
at t > t0 and the past consists of events that occurred at t < t0 .
• These notions of time, simultaneity and universality of masses, space
and time intervals had to be discarded and replaced with more accurate
concepts in the special theory of relativity, where speeds of bodies or ob-
servers could be comparable to that of light, which is a large but finite
constant in vacuum (c ≈ 3 × 108 m/s).
• Newtonian or nonrelativistic mechanics is a limiting case of special rela-
tivistic mechanics where the speed of light is infinite (very large compared
to other speeds). The principle of causality continues to apply in special
relativity, though the notions of past and future need to be revised.
26
degrees of freedom.
• Two point masses moving in three dimensional space have six degrees
of freedom. We need six coordinates (x1 , y2 , z1 ) and (x2 , y2 , z2 ) to specify
the locations of the two particles. E.g., the Sun and the Earth regarded
as point masses is a system with 6 degrees of freedom. Here, we do not
restrict to a particular orbit of the Earth around the Sun but ask how many
coordinates are needed to specify all possible locations of the Sun and the
Earth at any fixed instant of time, without reference to the nature of the
force between the two.
• A general rigid body like a stone has six degrees of freedom. For con-
venience, we may enumerate them as follows: 3 translational degrees of
freedom to fix the location of a marked point in the body and 3 rotational
degrees of freedom to orient the body holding the marked point fixed.
• A fluid consisting of N ∼ 1024 molecules in a bucket has a very large
number of degrees of freedom, which can be taken to be the 3N Carte-
sian coordinates needed to specify the instantaneous locations of the N
molecules, treated as point masses.
• An instantaneous configuration of a system of two point particles is any
possible location of the two particles.
• Zeroth law of classical mechanics. The path followed by a particle in
time is called its trajectory. It is a curve parametrized by time and directed
towards increasing time. The zeroth law of mechanics can be regarded
as saying that the trajectory r(t) of a particle is a (twice) differentiable
function of time.
• This not an assumption but rather an assertion about natural phenom-
ena, deduced by observing the motion of terrestrial and celestial bodies.
This assertion applies to the motion of planets, pendulum bobs, cricket
balls etc. But it fails for Brownian motion (movement of pollen grains in
water, which are observed to follow very jagged paths). It also fails for
27
electrons in an atom, which require a quantum mechanical treatment.
• Isaac Newton formulated three laws of classical mechanics in his Principia
(1687).
• Newton’s 1st law, or the law of inertia, says that “Every body continues in
its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a straight line, unless it is compelled
to change that state by a force impressed upon it”. In other words, the
momentum p = mv = mṙ of a particle that is free (isolated or far from
physical interactions) does not change with time. Note that if ṙ does not
change with time, i.e., r̈ = 0, then the trajectory r(t) = r(0) + ṙ(0)t is a
straight line that is uniformly traversed.
• In general, it is found that macroscopic interactions decrease with dis-
tance, so it is possible to isolate a particle by taking it far from other
bodies.
• We have been a bit imprecise in our statement of Newton’s first law.
Newton’s first law holds only in reference frames. To specify the compo-
nents of the position and velocity vectors, we need a frame of reference,
i.e., an origin and coordinate axes.
• It is found that a particle that is not subject to any forces (i.e., an
isolated body) could fail to follow a constant velocity trajectory in certain
reference frames.
• A frame in which Newton’s first law holds is said to be an inertial frame.
To a reasonable approximation (if one ignores some effects of the rotation
of the Earth), a frame that is fixed in a tennis court is an inertial frame
for the motion of tennis balls, racquets etc. In particular, if the effects of
gravity and friction are ignored (or somehow cancelled), then tennis balls
in this frame would always move uniformly in straight lines.
• However, it is found that Newton’s first law for tennis balls fails to hold
in a frame that is attached to a swinging pendulum or a rotating merry-
go-round beside the tennis court. Such frames are called accelerated or
noninertial.
28
• For instance, a frame that is attached to a bee as it flies irregularly in a
faraway spaceship is not inertial, since a free particle at rest in the same
spaceship would appear to move in a nonuniform manner.
• Note: here, we use the metaphor of the bee for the limited purpose of
defining a frame that moves nonuniformly relatively to the spaceship. A
flying bee is not a free particle - it does not move uniformly, it makes use
of its internal energy and friction with the air to change direction, speed
up or maintain its speed etc.
• Similarly, a frame that is attached to a top (spinning on the floor of the
spaceship) and participates in its rotational motion is noninertial.
• To summarize, Newton’s first law is the assertion that there is a frame
of reference (called an inertial frame) in which all isolated bodies (far from
physical interactions) move at constant velocity.
• As we will see shortly, from a principle enunciated by Galileo, an inertial
frame is not unique.
• Henceforth, unless otherwise stated, all quantities will be specified with
respect to an inertial frame of reference.
• There are indirect ways to check whether a frame is inertial even if one
cannot isolate particles. This makes use of Newton’s second law (which is
a statement about inertial frames) and its consequences. Roughly, suppose
we assume a frame is inertial, deduce consequences using Newton’s second
law and find that they are experimentally violated. Then, one possible
reason for the discrepancy can be that the frame was not inertial to begin
with. The Foucault pendulum gives a concrete realization of this idea and
strongly suggests that the Earth is not quite an inertial frame, due to its
rotation on its axis.
• The departure from rest or uniform motion along a straight line (in an
inertial frame) is caused by forces. For example, tugging at a string that
is attached to a ball exerts a force on the ball and makes it accelerate.
• Forces typically arise from interactions between objects. The Earth
29
exerts a force on a ball that is dropped, making it accelerate downwards.
• Newton’s 2nd law says that the rate of change of momentum ṗ is equal
to the impressed force. In particular, it is in the direction in which the
force acts.
• For a single particle of mass m, the acceleration a = r̈ = ṗ/m along
the trajectory r(t), due to the force F is determined by the equation
mr̈ = F or ṗ = F . (50)
The mass (more precisely, inertial mass) m of the particle is postulated to
be independent of time.
• We may use Newton’s 2nd law to give a way of assigning inertial masses
to bodies. We begin by selecting a reference body A and choose units in
which its inertial mass is assigned the value 1. We apply a force to A (e.g.,
let a compressed spring push it), and record its acceleration aA . Given
body B whose inertial mass we wish to determine, we apply the same
force to it, and measure its acceleration aB . Then we assign the mass
mB = |aA |/|aB |.
• The force is generally a vector field F (r), it could depend on the location
of the particle. To begin with, the force field may not be known to us, so
we do experiments with particles, observe their trajectories (measure their
accelerations) and thereby deduce what the force field may be. Having
done some such experiments, we develop a formula or picture of the force
field. This is called the inverse problem: determination of the force from
observed motion of particles. Having done this to our satisfaction, we may
then make predictions of what a given particle may do when subjected to
this force field by solving Newton’s equation with prescribed initial con-
ditions and the available information on F (r). This latter problem is
called the direct problem: finding trajectories given a force field. We then
compare these predicted trajectories with new observations to validate our
formula/picture for the force field. If discrepancies are found, we may need
to update our formula for the force field. Thus, one goes back and forth
between the inverse and direct problems.
• In Cartesian coordinates, the trajectory is given by r(t) = (x1 , x2 , x3 ) =
(x, y, z) and Newton’s second law becomes mẍi = F i . This component
30
form of Newton’s equation changes in curvilinear coordinates, such as
spherical polar coordinates (i.e., it does not simply say mr̈ = F · r̂ etc.).
For instance, there could be terms involving products of first derivatives of
coordinates in addition to naive second derivative ‘acceleration’ terms as
we found in plane polar coordinates:
m(r̈ − rθ̇2 ) = F · r̂ and m(rθ̈ + 2ṙθ̇) = F · θ̂. (51)
One may transform the equation from Cartesian coordinates to the desired
system to find the form it takes.
• Being 2nd order in time, Newton’s equation requires both the initial
position r and velocity or momentum ( ṙ or p) as initial conditions. For a
particle with 3 degrees of freedom, these would amount to 6 pieces of ini-
tial data (6 real numbers), say x(0), y(0), z(0) and px (0), py (0), pz (0). The
knowledge of the current position and momentum determines the trajectory
via Newton’s 2nd law. Bearing this in mind, we define the state of the par-
ticle as being specified by giving its instantaneous position and momentum.
Thus, the knowledge of the current state of the particle along with New-
ton’s second law determines its future evolution (trajectory). For instance,
for a particle moving on a line subject to a force field f (x), if we know x(t)
and p(t), then at the next instant of time, p(t + δt) ≈ p(t) + (δt)f (x(t))
and x(t + δt) ≈ x(t) + (δt)p(t)/m.
• The path of the particle r(t) (satisfying Newton’s equation and initial
conditions) is called its trajectory. Trajectories are oriented by arrows
specifying forward time evolution.
• Notice that Newton’s 2nd law relates the force to the second derivative of
position along a trajectory, as opposed to the first, third or other derivative.
This is to incorporate Galileo’s relativity principle which says roughly that
there is no dynamical way of telling if a frame is at rest or moving uniformly
relative to an inertial frame.
• In 1632, Galileo Galilei observed that it was not possible to detect the
uniform motion (constant velocity motion without rocking) of a ship rela-
31
tive to the shore by performing mechanical experiments under the deck of
the ship (i.e., without looking out or by using external forces etc.).
• These experiments could include observing the motion of projectiles (e.g.
how long it takes for a ball thrown horizontally at a given speed to reach a
wall), the manner in which water drips from a jug, how flies and fish move
and so on.
• It is important to note that Galileo’s principle is not concerned with
forces external to the lab. In other words, if the acceleration due to grav-
ity varies with location, then it may be possible for an observer in the
uniformly moving ship to infer that the ship’s frame is moving relative
to the shore. Thus, Galileo’s principle asserts that the relative motion of
bodies in the lab is the same whether observed when the ship is docked or
when it is uniformly moving.
• This idea is elevated to the principle of Galilean relativity, which states
that the laws of mechanics must take the same form in two inertial frames
that are in uniform motion relative to each other.
• Galileo’s principle of relativity continues to hold in special relativity.
To accommodate the constancy of the speed of light, Einstein modified
the transformation rule that relates coordinates in two frames that are in
uniform motion relative to each other.
• In Galilean relativity, it is assumed that
(a) the mass of a particle is the same in two frames that are in uniform
relative motion,
(b) both observers use the same scale for measuring distances and
(c) both observers agree on the time interval between any pair of events.
• In other words, uniformly moving measuring sticks have the same length
as when they are observed at rest and a clock that is moving at a constant
velocity neither slows down nor speeds up relative to a clock at rest.
• With these assumptions, the appearance of acceleration r̈ (rather than
velocity ṙ ) in Newton’s 2nd law can be motivated. It ensures that when
referred to a frame S 0 moving at constant velocity u relative to an inertial
frame S , Newton’s 2nd law takes the same form for a system of (interacting)
32
particles.
33
ship. For instance, variation in the acceleration due to gravity at different
locations could be used to determine that the experiment was performed
in a moving ship rather than at a fixed location on the shore. This does
not violate Galileo’s principle of relativity since the latter is not concerned
with external forces but with interparticle forces.
• If Newton’s 2nd law for a particle involved velocity instead of accelera-
tion, say ν ṙ = G, then in a frame moving at velocity u, the equation for
a free particle would take the form ν(ṙ 0 + u) = 0. The appearance of u on
the left of this equation implies that it does not have the same form as the
equation ν ṙ = 0 in S and would allow us to determine the velocity u of
the frame S 0 relative to S and thereby tell the frames apart, in violation
of Galileo’s principle.
• Relating the force to the second derivative of position (as opposed to, say,
the third derivative of r(t)) is the simplest way of incorporating Galileo’s
principle.
• Fortunately, experiments and observations confirm that Newton’s 2nd law
accurately describes both terrestrial and celestial mechanical phenomena
(motion of tennis balls, planets etc.), so there is no need to include higher
time derivatives in Newton’s second law, although they would not violate
Galileo’s principle.
• There are other reasons to avoid higher time derivatives on the LHS of
Newton’s equation. Indeed, suppose Newton’s second law for the position
...
x(t) of a particle moving along a line had a 3rd derivative term: mẍ+ν x =
f , for some constant ν 6= 0, where f is the force. Now, consider a free
...
particle, f = 0. The equation mẍ + ν x = 0 may be integrated once to
get mẋ + ν ẍ = α and integrated a second time to get mx + ν ẋ = αt + β
for constants of integration α, β . It can be shown that the solution of this
first order equation is
x(t) = γe−mt/ν + m−2 [m(β + αt) − αν] . (54)
where γ is a third constant of integration. For γ, ν 6= 0, this is clearly not
of the constant speed form x(0) + v(0)t. Thus, in violation of Newton’s 1st
law, this free particle trajectory does not have constant speed. We conclude
that a third derivative term on the left of Newton’s 2nd law equation would
not be consistent with Newton’s first law.
34
• Can the LHS of Newton’s equation mr̈ = F include a term such as
λr for some constant λ? No, for more than one reason. (a) This would
violate Newton’s first law, free particles would not always follow straight
line trajectories with constant speed. Indeed for λ 6= 0, mẍ + λx = 0 does
not admit the constant speed solution x(t) = vt + x0 . (b) It would violate
the homogeneity of space which requires that the laws of mechanics be
the same at all locations. Given the same external conditions, the results
of mechanical experiments do not depend on where they are performed.
Mathematically, Newton’s 2nd law equation must be translation-invariant.
Suppose we make a translation x0 = x+a, then mẍ+λx = f would become
mẍ0 + λ(x0 − a) = f , so that Newton’s equation would not take the same
form in a frame that is shifted by distance a relative to the original frame.
Note that interparticle forces are translation invariant, since they depend
on the relative locations of particles; the problem lies in the appearance of
a on the LHS of the equation of motion in the shifted frame.
• We also postulate that the laws of mechanics do not pick out any particu-
lar direction. We say that space is isotropic. The orientation of a frame has
no dynamical significance. Holding external conditions the same, rotating
the experimental apparatus does not change the results of experiments.
• Along with homogeneity and isotropy of space, we also postulate the
homogeneity of time. Given identical external conditions, the results of
mechanical experiments must not depend on when they are done. In other
words, the equations of mechanics must be invariant under translations of
time t → t + t0 . For instance, the masses of a pair of particles that interact
through interparticle forces cannot change with time.
• Space rotation invariance, space and time translation invariance along
with the invariance under a change from an inertial frame to one moving at
constant velocity are together termed the Galilean invariances of the laws
of mechanics.
35
or resultant of the two forces is the vector sum F = F1 + F2 . This is
to be expected from Newton’s 2nd law ma = F : acceleration is a vec-
tor and so force must also be a vector and vectors can be added using
the parallelogram law to obtain the total force. Newton does not mention
the superposition principle for forces as a separate law, but states it as
Corollary 1.
• It is noteworthy that Newton had more than three laws (about 5 or 6) in
his manuscript De motucorporum in mediis regulariter cedentibus that he
wrote a couple of years before the Principia. Some postulates/laws, such
as a version of the principle of relativity were later demoted to corollaries
of what we now call his three laws of motion.
• The superposition principle is very useful. It allows us to separately
determine individual forces on a body, which may have distinct origins
(gravitational, frictional, electric etc.) before adding them up to find the
total force.
• Note that we do not have a superposition principle for solutions of
Newton’s equation in general. For example, suppose mr̈1 = f1 (r1 ) and
mr̈2 = f2 (r2 ) are trajectories in the presence of individual forces. Then
putting r = r1 + r2 , we get mr̈ = f1 (r1 ) + f2 (r2 ). However, the latter
is generally not equal to the vector field f1 + f2 evaluated at r1 + r2 . So
we cannot in general ‘add’ trajectories in the presence of separate forces
to get a trajectory when both forces are present. The 1d example of a
superposition f = −kx + c of a linear restoring force f1 = −kx and a
constant force f2 = c provides a counterexample. Suppose mẍ1 = −kx1
and mẍ2 = c are trajectories in the presence of the separate forces. Verify
that the sum of these trajectories x = x1 + x2 satisfies mẍ = −kx1 + c
which differs from the desired equation mẍ = −kx + c = −k(x1 + x2 ) + c.
In general, it is meaningless to add solutions to Newton’s equation: they
typically do not form a linear space.
• Moreover, the superposition principle does not say that we can superpose
solutions to Newton’s equation for a given force field to get new solutions in
the same force field. For instance, suppose mr̈1 = f (r1 ) and mr̈2 = f (r2 ),
i.e., r1 (t) and r2 (t) are solutions of Newton’s equation for the same force
field f . Then in general r = r1 + r2 is not a solution of the equation
36
mr̈ = f (r). This is because the force could depend nonlinearly on the
location.
Newton’s 3rd law says that ‘to every action there is always opposed an
equal reaction’. In other words, if body A exerts a force F on body B ,
then B exerts a force −F on A. These two forces are called the impressed
and expressed forces. While the third law is not needed to understand
the motion of a particle subject to given external forces, it is needed to
understand the motion of bodies subject to interparticle forces.
• E.g. 1: The Sun attracts the Earth with a force equal in magnitude and
opposite in direction to the force exerted by the Earth on the Sun.
• E.g. 2: A cubical block of concrete of mass m that lies on the floor
exerts a downward force on the floor of magnitude equal to mg , where g
is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity. (Note: this is not the
force of the Earth on the block!) On the other hand, the floor exerts an
upward ‘normal reaction’ force N of the same magnitude mg on the block.
Notice that the impressed and expressed forces act on different bodies. In
this example, both forces can be called normal surface forces, it is just
conventional to call the force of the floor on the block by the name normal
reaction force. The force of the block on the floor is equally well a normal
reaction force. In a fluid, such equal and opposite normal surface forces
between small neighboring volumes of fluid go by the name of pressure.
• For future reference. Newton’s third law also helps us distinguish be-
tween a real force and a fictitious force in an accelerated or noninertial
37
reference frame that we will encounter in §??. According to Newton’s
third law, an acceleration due to a real force felt by a body is distinguished
by the presence of an equal and opposite reaction force on some other body.
38
2.9 Dimensional analysis and units
39
m1 and m2 is attractive and proportional to the product of the masses and
is inversely proportional to the square of the distance of separation. The
constant of proportionality is Newton’s gravitational constant G. If r1
and r2 are the position vectors of the two particles, then the force exerted
by m1 on m2 points from m2 towards m1 and is given by:
m1 m2
F1 on 2 = −G (r2 − r1 ) (56)
|r1 − r2 |3
By Newton’s third law, m2 exerts an equal and opposite force on m1 given
by F2 on 1 = −F1 on 2 .
• Principle of superposition of forces. Newton’s law of gravitation
applies to point particles. However, it may be used to calculate the force
due to extended bodies on point masses or on other extended objects. In
order to do this, one repeatedly uses the principle of linear superposition,
which states that the force due to two objects on a given particle is the
vector sum of the individual forces. Furthermore, the force on a composite
body is the vector sum of forces on all its constituents.
• By using the principle of superposition, one may show that the force on
a point mass m that lies outside a spherically symmetric mass distribution
is the same as the force due to a point particle (with mass equal to the
total mass M of the distribution) located at the center of the distribution.
• For example, the force due to a thin spherical shell of radius R and mass
M centered at the origin on a point mass m located at r (with r > R) is
given by −GmM |r|r̂ 2 . It turns out that the force vanishes inside the shell
due to a cancellation of forces due to diametrically opposite parts of the
spherical shell. These diametrically opposite surface elements have mass
proportional to their area, which grows as the square of the distance from
the apex of a cone. This quadratic growth is cancelled by the inverse square
fall off in Newton’s gravitational force so that the two elements exert equal
40
and opposite forces on a mass inside the shell.
• So far we have not been precise about what we mean by the mass of
a body or how it is to be fixed. The mass mi of a body that appears in
Newton’s second law F = mi a is called its inertial mass. We may use
Newton’s 2nd law to give a way of assigning inertial masses to bodies. We
begin by selecting a reference body A and choose units in which its inertial
mass is assigned the value 1. We apply a force to A (e.g., let a compressed
spring push it), and record its acceleration aA . Given body B whose
inertial mass we wish to determine, we apply the same force to it, and
measure its acceleration aB . Then we assign the mass mB = |aA |/|aB |.
In this manner, we assign inertial masses to various bodies.
• On the other hand, the masses that appear in Newton’s law of gravity
F2 on 1 = Gm1g m2g r̂/r2 are the gravitational masses, with r = r2 − r1 .
• Let us now focus on the gravitational force of the Earth on small bodies
near its surface. At the surface of the Earth, the force on a gravitational
mass mg is F = −GMe mg r̂/Re2 where Me is the gravitational mass of the
Earth and Re the radius of the Earth. The acceleration due to gravity
of the body is then a = F /mi = −(GMe (mg /mi )/Re2 )r̂. This downward
pointing acceleration is denoted g . On the face of it, the acceleration due
to gravity depends on the body through its inertial and gravitational mass.
• Equivalence principle. The surprising experimental observation is
that the acceleration due to gravity is the same for all bodies. The story of
different objects falling in unison from the leaning tower of Pisa is a way
to remember this. The magnitude of this acceleration g is approximately
9.8 m/s2 .
• Thus, the ratio mg /mi must be the same for all bodies. By absorbing
this constant ratio into G, we arrive at the equality mi = mg . This is called
the principle of equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses. Since we
have already assigned inertial masses to bodies, the Equivalence principle
41
gives a way of assigning gravitational masses as well. Henceforth we will
not make a distinction between inertial and gravitational masses.
• The weight of a body is defined as the Earth’s gravitational force acting
on it. At the the surface of the Earth, the weight of a body of mass m
is W = −(GMe m/Re2 )r̂ = mg . Since weight is a force, it is measured in
Newtons in SI units. The weight, as defined above, is independent of the
motion of the body.
• Normal reaction. There is a concept related to the weight of a body
that is sometimes confused with it. Consider a body of mass m at rest
on the Earth. Balance of forces in the vertical direction implies that the
floor must exert a ‘normal reaction’ force N = −mg upwards on the body.
This is the force that the floor exerts to support the body.
• Now suppose the body is in an elevator that accelerates upwards at
the rate a. The force due to gravity on the mass is still its weight W = mg .
Then Newton’s second law implies that ma = N + W or N = m(a − g).
Since N and a point upwards, while g points downwards, the magnitude
of the normal reaction is N = m(a + g). This is the force that the floor of
the elevator must exert upwards to support the body. The magnitude of
N exceeds the magnitude of the weight of the body. A ‘weighing’ scale is
usually calibrated to read the value |N |/g .
42
static forces between molecules. The frictional force between a body and a
surface, the viscous force between layers of a fluid or between a fluid and a
body moving through it are macroscopic manifestations of electric forces.
The force that a stretched string exerts also has its microscopic origin in
electric forces between molecules.
• For this reason, the electric force is called a fundamental force while
friction and viscosity are called emergent or phenomenological forces.
• Friction and viscosity are also examples of contact forces, exerted when
bodies are in contact.
• Though these forces arise from electrostatic interactions, it is often not
practical to deduce their strength from microscopic considerations. They
are usually described via effective macroscopic formulae based on experi-
mental measurements like Hooke’s law for a spring.
• For instance,
• Aside from gravity and electromagnetic forces, there are two more fun-
damental forces: the weak and strong nuclear forces. The latter are very
short-ranged and act typically over nuclear and subnuclear scales. They
are responsible for radioactive decay and for binding neutrons and protons
in nuclei.
43
px , py , pz of momentum is conserved, since ṗ = F = 0 (this is Newton’s
first law). If the force only acts downwards, then the horizontal components
of momentum px , py are conserved.
• However, there is a special class of forces where this work depends only
on the endpoints. In fact, suppose the force field is given by the negative
gradient of a potential function F (r) = −∇V (r). Then the work done by
such a ‘conservative’ force is
Z t1 Z t1
dr dV (r(t))
W (γ) = − ∇V · dt = − dt = V (a) − V (b), (58)
t0 dt t0 dt
which is seen to be the drop in the potential. Here we used the chain rule
to write
∂V ∂V ∂V dx dy dz ∂V dx ∂V dy ∂V dz dV
∇V · ṙ = , , · , , = + + = .
∂x ∂y ∂z dt dt dt ∂x dt ∂y dt ∂z dt dt
(59)
44
3.2 Conserved energy for a conservative force
45
from a to b, then using Newton’s second law,
Z tb Z Z
dr dp d(mv)
W (γ) = F· dt = · v dt = · v dt
t a
Z vb dt Z dt dt
1 1 1
= mv · dv = md(v 2 ) = mvb2 − mva2 .(62)
va 2 2 2
• This result is called the work-energy theorem or principle.
• Let us contrast this with formula (58) for the work done by a conservative
force (which depends only on the difference in potential energies at the end-
points of a trajectory). Despite appearances, the RHS of (62), (where we
make no assumption about the force being conservative) generally depends
on the trajectory and not just the endpoints a and b.
• In fact, the kinetic energies at a and b depend on the velocities (or mo-
menta) at a and b. As we noted in our discussion of Newton’s second law,
the specification of initial position and momentum is enough to determine
an entire trajectory.
46
• The torque due to a central force about the force center vanishes since
r and F are collinear. Thus, we conclude that the angular momentum
of a particle moving in a central force field is independent of time, it is a
conserved quantity.
• For a projectile moving under the vertical gravitational force, the torque
must be in the horizontal plane.
47
in the quantum mechanical context). They can change with time.
• In general, any function f (r, p) of the components of the position and
momentum of a particle is a dynamical variable. The potential V (r) is a
dynamical variable. The components of position x, y, z and those of mo-
mentum px , py , pz are the basic dynamical variables. In general, dynamical
variables change along the trajectory.
• Conserved quantities. Conserved quantities are dynamical variables
that are constant along every trajectory. This means the value of a con-
served quantity does not change as the system evolves. The value of a
conserved quantity may differ from trajectory to trajectory. For example,
energy is a conserved quantity for free particle motion. But the value of
energy in general differs from trajectory to trajectory, depending on how
fast the particle is moving. In general, the value of a conserved quantity is
determined by initial conditions.
• Note that the mass of a particle or the charge of a particle are not
dynamical variables. They are called parameters and are used to specify
the nature of the particle or system.
• Conserved quantities are useful. They help us solve/understand New-
ton’s equation for the trajectory. E.g., for a particle moving on a line sub-
ject to a conservative force, Newton’s 2nd order equation mẍ = −V 0 (x)
can be reduced to a first order equation stating the conservation of energy.
we may then integrate once more and get an (implicit) expression for x(t):
r
1 2 dx 2
E = mẋ + V (x) ⇒ =± (E − V (x))
2 Z x dt m
dx0
⇒ t − t0 = ± q (65)
2 0
m (E − V (x ))
x0
48
• In effect, we have solved Newton’s second order equation of motion in
two steps. Energy is the constant of integration in the first step and x0 is
the second constant of integration. We can think of x0 and E as specifying
(partial, see below) initial conditions at time t0 . Though t0 is a constant
of integration we do not regard it as as an initial condition, but rather
designate it as the initial time.
• Our answer expresses t as a function of x. We must invert it to find
trajectories x(t) with energy E and initial location x0 at t0 .
• Interestingly, there is often more than one trajectory with fixed energy
and initial location, corresponding to the ± signs.
• This is to be expected, since specificationp of energy allows two possible
initial velocities in general v0 = v(t0 ) = ± (2/m)(E − V (x0 )).
49
they are separated by distances large compared to the ranges of forces.
• A collision does not mean the particles come into contact.
• For example (a) two particles may collide, each suffering a deflection in
direction of motion, (b) a particle may disintegrate/decay into two or more
particles, (c) two or more particles may coalesce, etc.
• Evidently, the number of incoming and outgoing particles in a collision
need not be equal.
• Though particle number need not be conserved, collisions may be fruit-
fully treated using the conservation laws of mass, momentum and energy
even without a detailed knowledge of the forces of interaction.
• (Inertial) mass, regarded intuitively as the amount of matter, is conserved
in nonrelativistic mechanical processes: it is neither created nor destroyed.
• The conservation of momentum and energy should not come as a surprise.
If external forces may be neglected, the total momentum of a system is
conserved. For a system of particles, this is a consequence of Newton’s 2nd
and 3 rd laws, with the latter allowing cancellation of interparticle forces in
computing the rate of change of total momentum.
• The total energy of an isolated system is also conserved. However, ki-
netic energy could arise from or be transformed into other types of energy
(potential energy in a spring, chemical bond energy etc.) and we must
account for this.
• Suppose we have a collision among p (‘past’) incoming particles resulting
in f (‘future’) outgoing particles. Let the masses and velocities (as t →
∓∞) of the particles be denoted (mi , vi ) for i = 1, . . . , p, p + 1, . . . , p + f .
• Then the law of conservation of mass states that
m1 + · · · + mp = mp+1 + · · · + mp+f . (66)
50
• The conservation of energy reads
p p+f
X 1 X 1
mi vi2 = mi vi2 + Q. (68)
i=1
2 i=p+1
2
• The difference Q between initial and final kinetic energies is positive if,
say, kinetic energy is stored in a compressed spring or released as heat.
• It is negative if internal potential energy is converted into kinetic energy,
for instance in the decay of a particle that was initially at rest.
• If Q = 0, the collision is called elastic: kinetic energy is conserved but
may be redistributed among the particles.
• An example of a collision is the elastic ‘2 → 2’ scattering of two particles
which retain their identities (including their masses).
• In this case, conservation of mass is automatic and we have effectively 4
conservation laws (for energy and the three components of momentum).
• Given the initial velocities v1 , v2 , these 4 equations are insufficient to de-
termine the final velocities v3 , v4 , which comprise 6 unknowns. Although
conservation laws place restrictions on the final velocities, one needs infor-
mation on the nature of forces to determine the latter.
• However, in the special case of collisions in 1d, we have 2 conservation
laws and 2 unknown final velocity components and the system of equations
is even-determined.
• If we denote the initial and final velocities by v1 , v2 and v10 , v20 , then the
conservation laws for elastic 2 → 2 scattering become
m1 v1 + m2 v2 = m1 v10 + m2 v20 ≡ p and
1 1 1 1
m1 v12 + m2 v22 = m1 v102 + m2 v202 ≡ T. (69)
2 2 2 2
• Eliminating v10 = (p − m2 v20 )/m1 and writing M = m1 + m2 , we get
h p i
0 −1 2 2
v2 = M p ± p − M (m1 /m2 )(p /m1 − 2T )
= (2m1 v1 + (m2 − m1 )v2 )/M or v2 . (70)
• The second solution is the trivial one, where the particles retain their
velocities v10 = v1 , v20 = v2 . In the first, the scattering is nontrivial.
51
• For instance, suppose the particles had equal and opposite initial veloc-
ities, then show that the heavier particle comes to rest after the collision
if it is thrice as massive as the lighter one.
52
Multiplying by the ‘integrating factor’ ẋ we get
d 1
mẍẋ + V 0 (x)ẋ = 0 or mẋ2 + V (x(t)) = 0. (72)
dt 2
Thus, the total energy E = 21 mẋ2 + V (x) is conserved. This energy is the
sum of a kinetic energy 21 mẋ2 (which accrues from the particle’s motion)
and the previously introduced potential energy V (x).
4
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
x1 x2 x3 3 ● x5 ●
x4 x6
2
1 V(x)=E
x
-2 -1 0 1 2
• In Fig. 2, the closed interval [x2 , x3 ] (the square brackets mean the
endpoints are included) is a connected set, any two points in it can be joined
by a curve lying in it. On the other hand, the disjoint union [x2 , x3 ] ∪ {x4 }
is disconnected.
• The points x where the energy-E horizontal line intersects the graph
of V (x) are the places where ẋ vanishes momentarily and the energy is
purely potential. They are called ‘turning points’ since the particle turns
around at such a point if reached in finite time [this happens if V 0 6= 0 at
53
a turning point].
• For the potential in Fig. 2, the classically allowed region corresponding to
the indicated energy is a union of six connected sets, with initial conditions
determining in which one the motion takes place. From left to right, try
to argue that the qualitative motion is of the following sorts:
6 V(x)
4
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
x1 x2 x3 3 ● x5 ●
x4 x6
2
1 V(x)=E
x
-2 -1 0 1 2
(a) (−∞, x1 ]: Particle can come in from any point to the left of x1 , collide
against the barrier at x1 , turn around and escape/scatter to −∞. In
this process, the particle reaches x1 in a finite time. This is indicated
via the square bracket, which means the interval is closed at the x1
end.
(b) [x2 , x3 ]: Particle oscillates with finite time period between the turning
points at x2 and x3 .
(c) x4 : Particle remains at rest at the stable equilibrium point x4 .
(d) [x5 , x6 ): For instance, particle starting at x5 accelerates and moves
rightward but then slows down and takes infinitely long to reach x6 .
Consequently, x6 is not part of the interval, and this is indicated via
the round bracket. By contrast, the turning point at x5 is reached
in finite time, at which the particle comes instantaneously to rest and
reverses direction. [x5 , x6 ) is a ‘closed-open’ interval.
(e) x6 : Particle remains at rest at the unstable equilibrium point x6 .
(f) (x6 , ∞): Particle can come leftwards from large x, but slows down and
takes infinitely long to reach x6 . Starting from x > x6 with rightward
velocity, particle speeds up and escapes to infinity.
54
(g) (x1 , x2 ), (x3 , x4 ) and (x4 , x5 ) are forbidden intervals. The particle
cannot be found in any of these intervals since its kinetic energy would
have to be negative.
• While in (b)-(d) the particle is ‘bound’ or ‘confined’, in (a) and (f) the
motion can be unbounded. The foregoing statements about the finite or
infinite time taken to reach turning points can be established by solving
Newton’s equation.
55