Visual Studio 2019 Enterprise Edition Is Having Advantages Over Professional. Here Are They
Visual Studio 2019 Enterprise Edition Is Having Advantages Over Professional. Here Are They
3. And, finally, Visual Studio Enterprise is the most feature-rich and most expensive.
Each edition has all of the features of the edition below it, plus additional ones.
So the question “what are the differences between Visual Studio Enterprise and Professional”
really amounts to what the former can do that the latter can’t. So, we’ll look at that.
Since the 2010 version of Visual Studio Enterprise, it’s possible to perform architectural
validation on an app using architectural layer diagrams. You could integrate said validation in
your build process, for instance. If a class referenced a namespace in some layer it wasn’t
supposed to access, the build would fail.
In the latest version, this feature was also improved to offer live dependency validation. Instead of
having to wait for the build to break, Visual Studio, employing the power of Roslyn analyzers, will
give you real-time feedback whenever you’re about to introduce an invalid dependency.
Code duplication is one of the worst problems in a code base. Visual Studio Enterprise can help
developers and architects out there deal with this problem with a convenient feature: code clones
analysis. With this feature, Visual Studio can localize possible code duplicates so that you can
eliminate them.
This feature offers a new type of experience when debugging by allowing you to visualize the
current method—and also the previous methods called—as diagrams that integrate with the
debugger and update in real time as you step through your code.
Finally, we get to .NET Memory Dump Analysis. This feature allows you to analyze memory
dump files to identify and fix performance problems, such as memory leaks or unnecessary
allocations.
3. Testing Tools
We’re finally at testing tools. This area is, hands down, the one where Visual Studio Enterprise
outshines the other editions of the IDE. We’ll begin by talking about some of the features related to
automated unit tests and then proceed to cover features that can help with manual, exploratory,
and UI tests.
Unit Testing
Since we’re talking about unit testing, let’s now turn our attention to a topic that is sure to stir up
some controversy: test coverage.
Maybe you think that getting to 100% of code coverage is vital to an application’s health, or
perhaps you don’t. But you’d most likely agree that knowing the test coverage data is useful
nonetheless. Visual Studio Enterprise offers you this metric natively.
When you’re aiming to write good unit tests, a goal you should always strive for is isolation. A good
unit test should be kept as separate and independent as possible, not only from other tests but
also from infrastructure concerns. Details such as the machine’s clock or language shouldn’t
interfere with the test’s result.
Providing such isolation isn’t always easy though. Visual Studio Enterprise tries to solve that
problem with Microsoft Fakes.
Microsoft Fakes allows you to use stubs and shims to simulate external dependencies in your
code.
A classical use case for that would be to simulate a specific date to test for a time-sensitive bug.
Visual Studio Enterprise can go beyond even that. Through IntelliTest, it’s possible to
automatically generate a unit test suite for your code, along with fake test data.
Automated UI Tests
Visual Studio Enterprise can cater to those needs as well. With coded UI testing, you can create
automated tests that drive the application through its user interface. You’d do that by recording a
manual test and saving it. After the test is recorded, you can specify values for parameters and
fine-tune it using a special editor.
3B. Manual Tests
A code base should not live on automated tests alone though. Manual tests are still a vital part of a
comprehensive quality strategy, and Visual Studio Enterprise can cater to those needs as well.
And the primary tool used to do that is the Microsoft Test Manager, which is a comprehensive
solution that allows its user to complete the following tasks:
record and replay actions performed during exploratory (i.e., unscripted) test sessions
By employing this feature, a developer, tester, or test analyst can have a very wide view on what’s
happening on the project, test-wise. Think of it as a centralized control panel on all things test-
related.
Sure, we haven’t mentioned all of the exclusive features in Visual Studio Enterprise, for brevity’s
sake. But I’m confident that the article made clear that Visual Studio Enterprise is aimed primarily
at software architects and QA experts.
I’d say you can’t go wrong with Visual Studio Professional. It’s an excellent choice for most
developers. For software architects though, Visual Studio Enterprise might make sense, as long as
you have plenty of budget. But if you don’t, a lot of plugins in the Visual Studio ecosystem can
help you get VS Enterprise’s features in ala carte fashion.
Conclusion” Based on the aforementioned points, you can choose either Professional or
Enterprise. Professional will also can work well but all features are covered with Enterprise.Based
on the requirement and scope we can decide either one.
Thank You!