The Complete Surface Finish Guide For 3D Printing
The Complete Surface Finish Guide For 3D Printing
THE
COMPLETE
SURFACE
FINISH
GUIDE FOR
3D PRINTING
Additive Manufacturing
at your scale.
1
The Complete Surface Finish Guide for 3D Printing
CONTENTS
Introduction 3
Key considerations 6
Design 9
First steps 9
Post-processing 14
Polishing 16
Dyeing 18
Chemical smoothing 20
Color Touch 22
Metalization 24
Coating 26
© Copyright 2020 Sculpteo SAS. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is provided for information purposes only.
Sculpteo shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. Product specifications and all information
herein is subject to change without notice.
2
The Complete Surface Finish Guide for 3D Printing
INTRODUCTION
THE PERCEPTION OF
Myth 1: 3D printing can’t make
3D PRINTED PARTS
quality parts
52%
use 3D printing for end-use
mechanical parts Ultrasint® PA11 - SLS, Unfinished
27%
Myth 3: 3D printing is not
industrialized
use 3D printing for end-use Along with the demand for quality
consumer goods parts, scalability is also becoming
essential for businesses looking to
The State of 3D Printing 2021, Sculpteo
adopt 3D printing. While the common
conception of the technology is a
simple desktop 3D printer, capable of
Why choose 3D printing for series producing parts one at a time, today,
production? Many companies are able industrial machines are producing
to benefit from mass-customization, thousands of parts in a single batch
limited editions, and on-demand with powder bed fusion technologies.
manufacturing to be more responsive
to market demands. 3D printing These industrial 3D printing
offers competitive costs per part technologies allow for scaled
and shorter turn around times for production with high-performance
small and medium production runs materials rivaling injection plastics
impossible to achieve with traditional and even metal parts.
manufacturing methods.
KEYS TO ACHIEVING A
QUALITY PART
TECHNOLOGY &
MATERIAL
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Resolution
1
Ultracur3D® RG 35 - DLP, Coating finish (Source: Forward AM)
THE HIERARCHY OF
3D PRINTING SURFACE
QUALITY
As-built surface quality refers to the raw (unfinished) surface of a part after being printed.
Surface quality is an essential aspect to consider before post-processing, as it will affect
the final result of your project. The main factor to consider is the technology you are
planning to use. It is important to note that surface quality will have to be balanced
against scale and cost when choosing the technology for your project.
Wax Casting
DLP/LCD
Smooth surface, SLA
slightly visible layers Polyjet
SLS
Slightly visible layers, MJF
grainy texture DMLS/SLM
SURFACE QUALITY AT
SCALE
Surface quality and scalability are often seen as being in competition when it comes to
additive manufacturing. But, with powder bed fusion and large format LCD technologies,
quality at scale is a reality.
Technology SLS & MJF SLS & MJF LCD SLS & MJF
Properties
Versatile Flexibility Waterproof Bio-sourced
Polish Polish
Post-processing Chemical smooth Chemical smooth Sanding Chemical smooth
Color touch Metalization Metalization Color touch
options Metalization Coating Coating Metalization
Coating Coating
Raw color
Supports
required
Large Build Volume Large Build Volume Large Build Tray Large Build Volume
Summary
• Overall, powder bed fusion technologies provide a consistent starting point however,
industrialized post-processing is recommended for a more refined touch/feel.
• Resin technologies (DLP/LCD, DLS, SLA) offer a better raw surface finish but present
with fewer possibilities for post-processing.
DESIGN
FIRST STEPS
The surface quality of your part starts 2. Respect the design guidelines
with the design process, but there
are some important first steps to While 3D printing removes
consider: many limitations of traditional
manufacturing, there are still some
1. Choose your technology, constraints to follow to ensure the
material, and post-processing design can be manufactured. Design
guidelines for each technology and
The choice of material, technology, material such as minimum wall
and post-processing with necessarily thickness, feature size, and tolerance
influence the design process and reduce the risk of failed parts and
play a critical role in the outcome defects during production. It’s also
of the part. The design has to be important to consider the constraints
adapted to the specific requirements of the post-processing since these
of the technology, taking into processes could damage fragile
consideration the need for supports design elements.
or manufacturing constraints. With
respect to material choice, this will
inform the potential post-processing 3. Pay attention to your 3D file
options and ultimately the final look.
Even after designing the perfect 3D
model which respects the design
guidelines of the chose material/
technology, turning this 3D model into
a physical object involves converting
the software’s native CAD format
into one that can be communicated
to the printer. This process is called
meshing and it plays a direct impact
on the surface quality of the part. The
higher the quality of the meshing the
higher the resolution of the print.
Meshing is particularly important on
round surfaces to avoid seeing faces
on the final part.
Ultracur3D® EPD 4006 - LCD, Unfinished
• Avoid curved surfaces and low angle slopes in the Z direction, resulting in visible
steps between layers.
• Minimize support structures especially on important surfaces. The more your model
is in contact with supports, the more likely their removal may result in marks or breaks.
• Curved surfaces and low angle slopes in the Z direction will cause visible steps.
• Dense parts or thick walls greater than 15mm can cause surface damage due to
thermal issues during the cooling process.
• For MJF technology, anticipate downskin (smoother) and upskin (leaves sharper edges
and grainier surface). Orient important faces downwards.
• Abrupt changes in thickness, such as ribs behind a surface can be visible through the
surface, due to thermal shrinking.
• Powder can be difficult to extract from designs with fine details, textures, or engraving.
DESIGN COMPLEXITY:
MINIMIZING SURFACE
AREA
11
Ultracur3D® EPD 1086 - LCD, Unfinished
The Complete Surface Finish Guide for 3D Printing
THE POSSIBILITIES
OFFERED BY TEXTURE
The question of 3D printing surface quality has always centered on making parts as
smooth as possible, eliminating layer lines, and having the look and feel of injection
molded parts. While 3D printing and post-processing technologies have certainly made
advances in this regard, it’s also possible that what was once considered a “bug” could
rather be considered a feature of 3D printing if we make the most of surface textures in
the design process. In fact, if used creatively, texturing can even be a great advantage of
3D printed parts over injection molding.
Integrating textures on injection molded parts is a costly and complex process involving
etching of a texture into a physical mold. Custom textures can be designed directly into
the CAD file allowing for more flexibility and infinite design possibilities. With 3D printing, a
textured part costs the same to produce as a smooth one while unlocking new potentials
for designed surfaces.
Texture is another piece of the puzzle to achieve a high quality surface on 3D printed
parts. There are two main reasons to integrate texture: aesthetics and function.
Aesthetics:
Even the highest resolution 3D printing technologies will still leave some slightly visible
layers, using surface textures can camouflage these traits of the 3D printing process.
With some clever texturing, 3D printed parts are indistinguishable from injection molding
and can even offer other advantages such as branding or creating a uniform style across
product lines.
Function:
Texture can also provide significant advantages when if comes to the function of end
use parts. There are three main scenarios where texture can improve the function: using
texture to improve the friction of a handle with a textured grip, texturing large surfaces
to improve the stiffness and strength of parts, without adding material by increasing wall
thickness, and finally, to create so called “high-performance surfaces”, specially designed
surfaces that improve water or air flow, reducing surface tension, or optimizing fluid
distribution for example.
POST-PROCESSING
l Proces
ysica s
Ph
POLISHING
PAINTING
ss
mical Proce
COLOR
Coloring
TOUCH
CHEMICAL DYEING
SMOOTHING
METALIZATION
Che
COATING
Visual Appearance
1
To compare the effects of different finishing techniques, we will refer to a 3D printed
test piece which features common surfaces and textures. The benchmark test piece is
printed in PA12 using SLS technology. This test piece can also serve as a guideline to
identify design constraints to keep in mind for each post-processing solution.
Material Compatibility:
• All polymers & metals
Tips:
• Avoid fragile parts with small details or overhangs
• Large flat surfaces can be difficult to polish in a
rotating tumbler
• Abrasive may be logged in hollow parts or parts with
small openings
16
The Complete Surface Finish Guide for 3D Printing
POLISHING
CLOSER LOOK
PA12 SLS
This information and values are presented as guidance only and based on Sculpteo's knowledge and experience. It is believed to be accurate, however all guarantees are explicitly
denied. This document was updated July 2021.
Raw
Polishing considerably improved the surface roughness of the test part. We notice a slight
rounding of the pointed features of the test piece. No other imperfections on the rest of
the features are noticeable.
Material Compatibility:
• Polyamides • Acrylic • PEEK
• Polyurethane • Polyester • ABS
• Elastomer • TPU
Wide range
of colors
Tips:
• Colors may fade over time
• Not recommended for exterior environments (UV
light, wet conditions)
18
The Complete Surface Finish Guide for 3D Printing
DYEING
CLOSER LOOK
PA12 SLS
This information and values are presented as guidance only and based on Sculpteo's knowledge and experience. It is believed to be accurate, however all guarantees are explicitly
denied. This document was updated July 2021.
Raw
The dyeing process results in a lower Young’s Modulus and a higher Elongation at Break.
Dyed parts are softer and more flexible. The surface roughness has also slightly increased
after treatment. The deep blue highlights the leather texture and emphasizes the relief of
the other features.
Material Compatibility:
• All polymers
Tips:
• Avoid parts with high variation in density
• Avoid fragile parts or parts with tight cavities
• Parts must be suspended within the machine
20
The Complete Surface Finish Guide for 3D Printing
CHEMICAL SMOOTHING
CLOSER LOOK
This information and values are presented as guidance only and based on Sculpteo's knowledge and experience. It is believed to be accurate, however all guarantees are explicitly
denied. This document was updated July 2021.
Raw
Chemical Smoothing drastically improves the surface roughness of the test piece. With a
lower Young’s Modulus and higher Elongation at Break, parts are more flexible and softer
for PA12. There were no significant differences in the mechanical properties of TPU. The
features of the test part have a slightly glossy finish, without any alteration to the geometry.
Material Compatibility:
• All polyamides
Tips:
• Avoid fragile parts with small details or overhangs
• Large flat surfaces can become warped
• Abrasive may be logged in hollow parts or parts with
small openings
22
The Complete Surface Finish Guide for 3D Printing
COLOR TOUCH
CLOSER LOOK
PA12 SLS
This information and values are presented as guidance only and based on Sculpteo's knowledge and experience. It is believed to be accurate, however all guarantees are explicitly
denied. This document was updated July 2021.
Raw
The Color Touch process has greatly reduced the surface roughness while also decreasing
the Young’s Modulus to make the test part slightly more flexible. We notice a slight softening
of edges and pointed features of the test piece.
Material Compatibility:
• All polymers
• All photopolymers
Tips:
• Small details may be lost due to the metal layer
• Any surface imperfections will be amplified, ensure a
smooth surface
24
The Complete Surface Finish Guide for 3D Printing
METALIZATION
CLOSER LOOK
This information and values are presented as guidance only and based on Sculpteo's knowledge and experience. It is believed to be accurate, however all guarantees are explicitly
denied. This document was updated July 2021.
Raw
Metalization has dramatically reduced the surface roughness, making the best surface
treatment of all post-processes we tested. Metalization also lowered the elongation at
break for PA12 while an increase of stiffness is noted for TPU parts. The testing process
caused the metalization surface to crack for TPU tensile bars. The surface of the wave
features resulted in a quality finish after metalization, however, the other test features with
finer details resulted in rough edges and inconsistent metalization in deeper textures.
Material Compatibility:
• All Polyamides
• TPU
Tips:
• Small details may be lost due to the coating layer
• Very complex geometries which are difficult to
access are not recommended
COATING
CLOSER LOOK
This information and values are presented as guidance only and based on Sculpteo's knowledge and experience. It is believed to be accurate, however all guarantees are explicitly
denied. This document was updated July 2021.
Raw
Coating greatly improved the surface roughness of the test piece and also resulted in a
softer, more flexible PA12 part. For TPU there was no significant difference in mechanical
properties. The waves and leather texture features produce a suitable finish after coating.
More profound textures with tight gaps leave visible imperfections where an uneven
coating application suppresses the texture.
PUTTING IT ALL
TOGETHER
+ 33 1 83 64 11 22 1-800 814-1270
sculpteo.com
29