Scribd
Upload
53 views

Excel For Design 1

This document summarizes Design Option 1 for a single stage reheat steam turbine cycle with four extractions, three closed feedwater heaters, and one open feedwater heater. It includes tables showing state points, mass flow rates, work and heat values, thermal efficiency, and other key parameters for the system. The design meets the specified inlet pressure and temperature and uses four extractions to achieve the required condenser temperature.

Uploaded by

Maria Katherine Cruz Pantoja
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
53 views

Excel For Design 1

This document summarizes Design Option 1 for a single stage reheat steam turbine cycle with four extractions, three closed feedwater heaters, and one open feedwater heater. It includes tables showing state points, mass flow rates, work and heat values, thermal efficiency, and other key parameters for the system. The design meets the specified inlet pressure and temperature and uses four extractions to achieve the required condenser temperature.

Uploaded by

Maria Katherine Cruz Pantoja
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

DESIGN OPTION 1, SINGLE STAGE REHEAT WITH FOUR EXTRACTION, 3 CLOSED FEED WATER HEATERS AND 1 OPEN FEED

WAT

Initial Parameters
ParameterValue Unit Remarks
Inlet Press 565 0C Based on Equipment Catalogue
Inlet Temp 19 Mpa Based on Equipment Catalogue
Condenser 42.6 0C Based on Equipment Catalogue

Extraction Temperatures
ParameterValue Unit Remarks
No. of extr 4 Based on Design Requirements
Tmax 565 0C Inlet Temperature
Tmin 42.6 0C Condenser Temperature
Delta T 104.48 0C (Tmax-Tmin)/(n+1)

Cycle Calculation
State PointTemperatuPressure Enthalpy Entropy Specific V Wpumpin Remarks
1 565 19 3450.287 6.424974 Superheated Vapor
2 460.52 10.5967 3261.998 6.424974 Superheated Vapor
3 565 10.5967 3533.65 6.771491 Superheated Vapor
4 356.04 2.978375 3130.715 6.771491 Superheated Vapor
5 251.56 1.359641 2933.06 6.771491 Superheated Vapor
6 147.08 0.440045 2703.7 6.771491 Superheated Vapor
7 42.6 0.008472 2124.851 6.771491 Wet Mixture
8 42.6 0.008472 178.4014 0.001009 1.363224 Saturated Liquid
9 42.6 0.008472 179.7647 Compressed Liquid
10 147.08 0.440045 619.5914 Compressed Liquid
11 147.08 0.440045 619.5914 Saturated Liquid
12 147.08 0.440045 619.5914 Saturated Liquid
13 193.6771 1.359641 823.8631 0.001147 20.23125 Compressed Liquid
14 193.6771 1.359641 844.0943 Saturated Liquid
15 233.4522 2.978375 1006.45 Compressed Liquid
16 233.4522 2.978375 1006.45 Saturated Liquid
17 233.4522 2.978375 1006.45 Saturated Liquid
18 315.2852 10.5967 1433.538 Compressed Liquid
19 315.2852 10.5967 1433.538 Saturated Liquid
20 315.2852 10.5967 1433.538 Saturated Liquid

Fractional Mass Flowrate


ParameterValue Unit Remarks
ms 1 kg/kg
m1 0.233578 kg/kg m1=ms(h18-h15)/(h2-h19)
m2 0.029468 kg/kg m2=(ms(h15-h14)-m1(h20-h16))/(h4-h16)
m3 0.04431 kg/kg m3=(ms(h13-h10)-m1(h17-h10)-m2(h17-h10))/(h5-h10)
m4 0.033724 kg/kg m4=((m1-m2-m3)*(h10-h9))/(h6-h11)
Actual Mass Flowrate
ParameterValue Unit Remarks
ms 441.9484 ms = plant capacity / (ng*Wnet); ng = 0.98 based on equipment catalog
m1 103.2295 m1 = ms * m1 fractional mass flow rate
m2 13.02325 m2 = ms * m2 fractional mass flow rate
m3 19.58278 m3= ms * m3 fractional mass flow rate
m4 14.90426 m4 = ms * m4 fractional mass flow rate
Work, Heat Addition and Rejection, Thermal Efficiency
ParameterValue Unit Remarks
Wt1 950.2209 kJ/kg Wt1 = (msh1) - (ms-m1)(h2)
Wt2 493.5444 kJ/kg Wt2 = (ms-m1)(h3)-(m2)(h4)-m3(h5)-m4(h6)-(ms-m1-m2-m3-m4)(h6)
Wt3 68.84396 kJ/kg Wt3 = (ms-m1-m2-m3-m4)(h6-h7)
Wtotal 1512.609 kJ/kg
Wtactaul 718.4894 kJ/kg efficiency = 47.5%
Wp1 0.944229 kJ/kg Wp1 = (ms-m1-m2-m3)(h9-h8)
Wp2 20.23125 kJ/kg Wp2 = (ms)(h14-h13)
Wptotal 21.17548 kJ/kg
Wpactual 25.82376 kJ/kg efficiency = 82% based on original capstone project
Qr 1234.868 kJ/kg Qr = (ms-m1-m2-m3-m4)(h7)-(ms-m2-m3)(h8)
Qa1 2016.749 kJ/kg Qa1 = (ms)(h1-h18)
Qa2 208.2001 kJ/kg Qa2 = (ms-m1)(h3-h2)
Qatotal 2224.949 kJ/kg
Wnet 692.6656 kJ/kg
nth 0.311318 nth = Wnet/Qatotal
Work, Heat Addition and Rejection, in kW
ParameterValue Unit Remarks
Wt1 419948.6 kW Wt1 = wtactual*m1actual
Wt2 218121.1 kW Wt2 = wt2actual * m2actual
Wt3 30425.48 kW Wt3 = wt3actual * m3actual
Wtotal 668495.2 kW
Wtactaul 317535.2 kW efficiency = 47.5%
Wp1 417.3006 kW
Wp2 8941.169 kW
Wptotal 9358.469 kW
Wpactual 11412.77 kW
Qr 545747.8 kW
Qa1 891298.8 kW
Qa2 92013.69 kW
Qatotal 983312.5 kW
Wnet 306122.4 kW
nth 0.311318
ATERS AND 1 OPEN FEED WATER HEATER

You might also like