Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU), Belgaum.

Project synopsis on
“Acoustic Noise Cancellation In Headphones”
Submitted by
1) Ashwin Dutt. R ( 1AT07EC013)
2) Gururaj. B ( 1AT07EC027)
3) Basavaraj Bhosgi ( 1AT07EC016)
4) Nagadatta.P (1AT07EC050)

Internal Guide
External Guide
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mr. Lokesh.H
Lect in ECE Deptt. NAL

Place –
National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL),
Bangalore.

Department of Electronics and Communication,

Atria Institute of Technology,
Anandnagar,
 Bangalore.
AIM
To reduce unwanted ambient sounds (i.e., acoustic
noise) by means of active noise control (ANC).

Noise cancellation headphones (NCHs) supplement the acoustic

isolation characteristic of headphones with active noise reduction.
By their nature, headphones block out some degree of external
noise because the ear cups absorb it, but NCHs go a step further
and diminish the noise that manages to get through.The principles
of passive attenuation after which active attenuation which
includes feedforward and feedback methods, are described.

Introduction
The noise canceling headphones reduce unwanted ambient
sounds. This is also called acoustic noise. This is done by Active
Noise Control(ANC).This is done by placing a microphone near
the ear and then using electronic circuitry to generate an anti-noise
sound wave. The opposite polarity of the sound wave that is made
arrives at the microphone. This results in a destructive interference
(what gives noise canceling ability). In turn, it cancels out the
noise within the enclosed headphone.

ANC is based on either feedforward control or feedback control. In

feedforward control, a reference input coherent with the noise is
sensed before it propagates past the secondary source. In feedback
control, the active noise controller attempts to cancel the noise
without the benefit of an “upstream” reference input. Feedforward
ANC is generally more robust than feedback ANC particularly

2
when the feedforward system has a reference input isolated from
the secondary antinoise source.

NCHs rely on the passive acoustic isolation of headphones as well

as ANC to provide broadband noise reduction as shown in Fig 1.
Closed-ear headphones can passively block high frequency noise
down to about 500Hz. At high frequencies, a welldesigned closed-
ear headphone can reduce noise by nearly 30dB - the amount of
attenuation being dependent upon the quality of the seal from the
ear cushion around the ears, the construction of the earcups and the
sound-absorbent materials used in the earcups.

Figure.1 Operational range of active and passive noise reduction

3
 Feedforward Control

Figure.2 Adaptive Noise cancellation headphone

Digital filters for noise cancellation are called adaptive filters and
can correct for both phase and amplitude errors. A NCH using
adaptive noise reduction is shown in Fig.2 was proposed by Chu
Moy . A reference microphone at the top of the headband receives
a noise signal. The adaptive filter attempts to predict the noise
inside the earcup by passing the signal through a transfer function
that models the headphone system. The inverse of the predicted
noise is added to the desired audio signal and then sent to the
headphone transducer. A second microphone inside the earcup
measures the resulting sound and generates an error signal to
converge the filter to zero for more accurate anti-noise .

The algorithm used in an adaptive filter is typically a least means

square (LMS) type,which is pre-trained offline (usually with white
noise) for broadband operation. The disadvantage to LMS filters is
that they must be retrained for changes in the feedback path (e.g.,
temperature changes, a different person wear the headphones). If

4
the noise is narrow-band or a tone, the performance of the noise
cancellation will degrade because LMS filters will try to adapt
without converging. For narrow-band noise cancellation, the
solution is to use an infinite impulse response (IIR) filter. An IIR is
best to model the acoustic system and feedback path, because IIRs
have a recursive characteristic to provide an infinite response and
have feedforward and feedback sections to generate zeros and
poles. A recursive LMS algorithm (made of two LMS filters) can
optimally adapt the filter coefficients .

Adaptive Algorithms
Adaptive filtering means that filter parameters such as bandwidth
and resonant frequency change with time. This is done by allowing
the coefficients of the adaptive filter to vary with time and to be
adjusted automatically by an adaptive algorithm. This has the
important effect of enabling adaptive filters to be applied in areas
where the exact filtering operation required is unknown or
nonstationary.

 LMS algorithm

The least mean square (LMS) algorithm is the simplest and is the
most universally applicable adaptive algorithm to be used. This
algorithm is used for the descending on the performance surface,
and is known as the least mean square algorithm. The weights
are updated using this algorithm. This algorithm uses a special
estimate of the gradient that is valid for the adaptive linear
combiner. This algorithm is important because of its simplicity and
ease of computation, and it doesn’t require off-line gradient
estimations or repetitions of data. If the adaptive system is an

5
adaptive linear combiner, and if the input vector x(n) and the
desired response d(n) are available at each iteration, the LMS
algorithm is generally the best choice for many different
applications of adaptive signal processing .

 Filtered- X LMS algorithm

The use of adaptive filter is complicated by the fact that electrical

reference signal must be obtained from the acoustic pressure using
a microphone. Also, an electrical error signal must be obtained
from the residual acoustic noise using as error microphone.
Finally, the canceling sound must be produced from the electrical
output signal using a loud speaker. Therefore, a number of other
transfer functions must be included. The summing junction
represents acoustic superposition in the space from the canceling
loudspeaker to the error microphone, where the primary noise is
combined with the output of the adaptive filter. Therefore it is
necessary to compensate for the secondary path transfer function
S(z) from y(n) to e(n),which includes the D/A converter
reconstruction filter, power amplifier error microphone etc.

 Transform Domain Adaptive Algorithm

The main shortage of the filtered –X LMS algorithm, which is

widely used in a variety of active noise control (ANC) systems, is
that its convergence behavior highly depends on the power
spectrum of the filtered reference signal. The more correlated
reference signal is the slower convergence speed the adaptive filter
can achieve. Transform domain adaptive filter (TDAF) into ANC
to solve this problem. To strongly correlate broadband signal,
TDAF can achieve much faster convergence speed than LMS with
relative low computational cost .

6
 Practical Applications
o Noise canceling headphones are particularly useful for
workers, operating or working near heavy machinery and
engines. The noise is selectively eliminated thus enabling the
reception of the desired sounds, such as speech and warning
signals.

o Cabin noise in small aircraft is a combination of noise from a

variety of sources, the major ones being the engine, wind,
and propeller. So plane pilots routinely wear noise
attenuating headsets to get rid of the unwanted noise. Such
headsets usually employ passive noise attenuation in the form
of an annular cushion carried on the rim of each earcup. But
NCH is proved to be worthy in attenuating noise to a further
level which makes the pilot as well as passengers to hear
warnings and instructions effectively.

o In hospitals to diagnose the hearing defects in human ear and

speech discrimination, noiseless room is required which is
highly expensive. Most of the hospitals cannot afford to
procure such rooms. The noise canceling headphone along
with audiometry apparatus can be useful in this application as
shown in figure 3.

7
 Figure.3 Feedback noise cancellation for tone
audiometry.
The proposed NCH for audiometry is as shown in Fig.3. A
test tone is given to headphone as input. A microphone is
placed inside the headphone which senses noise along with
tone. The test tone is subtracted from the microphone output
using spectral subtraction before it is given as input to LMS
block. The output of the LMS block is an anti noise signal
which is added to test tone at the summing block. Finally the
speaker gives an output which is a combination of anti noise
signal and tone so that anti noise signal cancels the noise and
listener only gets test tone. The attenuation required for
audiometry application is high compared to other
applications of NCHs. So the better passive attenuation as
well active attenuation is required.

o In military applications, the soldiers usually work noisy

environments. NCH are handy in hearing commands through
mobile sets devoid of any noise.

o As a commercial application NCHs along with personalized

music system (Walkman, etc.) can provide better listening
conditions for music. Sony, NCT, Aiwa, and Bose
Corporation are producing these headphones, mainly used for
audio listening.

8
Advantages of noise-cancelling headphones
The advantages of active noise control methods compared to
passive ones are that they are generally:

• More effective at low frequencies.

• Less bulky.
• Able to block noise selectively.

Disadvantages of noise-cancelling headphones

Noise-cancelling headphones have several disadvantages (that vary
from vendor to vendor):

• They consume power, usually supplied by a battery that must

occasionally be replaced.
• They may not cancel all sound effectively. Some noise-
cancelling headphones can be overloaded by low-frequency
pressure waves, distorting the desired signal.
• They may introduce additional noise, usually in the form of
high-frequency hiss.

9
References

[Moy01] Chu Moy, “Active noise reduction headphone systems”,

http://headwize2.powerpill.org/tech/anr_tech.htm,

[McI01] J.D. McIntosh, ” Active noise cancellation aircraft headset system”

US Patent No. 6,278,786 08/21/01

[Kuo96] S.M. Kuo and D.R. Morgan, Active Noise Control Systems
Algorithms and DSP Implementations, city: New York, John Wiley, pp. 62-
64, pp 195-200, 1996.

[Eri87] L.J. Eriksson, "Active sound attenuation system with on-line

adaptive feedback
cancellation," US Patent No. 4,677,677, 6/30/87

[Raf02] Boaz Rafaely, “Active noise reducing headset”, Online Symposium

for Electronic Engineers, http://www.osee.net/whitepapers/paper489.pdf

[Bos84] A. Bose, "Headphoning," US Patent No. 4,455,675, 6/19/84.

[Sap93] R. Sapiejewski, "High compliance headphone driving," US Patent

No. 5,181,252, 1/19/93.

[Zan93] K.C Zangi, “A new two-sensor active noise cancellation algorithm”

Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1993. ICASSP-93., 1993 IEEE
International Conference on, Volume: 2, 27-30 April 1993, Page(s): 351
-354

[Son02] L. Song, L. Xiaodong and T. Jing, ”Transform domain adaptive

filter in active
noise control “, Proc. of 6th International Conference on Signal Processing,
Volume: 1,
26-30 Aug.2002, Page(s): 272 -275

10
11