0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views21 pages

Couplers

Uploaded by

sjmorabad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views21 pages

Couplers

Uploaded by

sjmorabad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

EAD 160129-00-0301

January 2020

COUPLERS FOR MECHANICAL


SPLICES OF REINFORCING
STEEL BARS

©2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 2/21

The reference title and language for this EAD is English. The applicable rules of copyright refer to the
document elaborated in and published by EOTA.
This European Assessment Document (EAD) has been developed taking into account up-to-date technical
and scientific knowledge at the time of issue and is published in accordance with the relevant provisions
of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 as a basis for the preparation and issuing of European Technical
Assessments (ETA).

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 3/21

Contents

1 Scope of the EAD .................................................................................................... 4


1.1 Description of the construction product 4
1.2 Information on the intended use of the construction product 5
1.2.1 Intended use ............................................................................................................. 5
1.2.2 Working life/Durability ............................................................................................... 5
1.3 Specific terms used in this EAD (if necessary in addition to the definitions in CPR,
Art 2) 5
1.3.1 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 5
1.3.2 Definitions ................................................................................................................. 7
2 Essential characteristics and relevant assessment methods and criteria ...... 8
2.1 Essential characteristics of the product 8
2.2 Methods and criteria for assessing the performance of the product in relation to
essential characteristics of the product 8
2.2.1 General ..................................................................................................................... 8
2.2.2 Resistance to static or quasi-static loading .............................................................. 9
2.2.3 Slip under or after static or quasi-static loading ....................................................... 9
2.2.4 Resistance to high cycle fatigue loading .................................................................. 9
2.2.5 Resistance to low cycle loading (seismic actions) ................................................. 10
2.2.6 Reaction to fire ........................................................................................................ 10
3 Assessment and verification of constancy of performance ........................... 11
3.1 System(s) of assessment and verification of constancy of performance to be
applied 11
3.2 Tasks of the manufacturer 11
3.3 Tasks of the notified body 11
3.4 Special methods of control and testing used for the assessment and verification of
constancy of performance 12
4 Reference documents .......................................................................................... 13
Details of Tests and evaluation of the test results ........................................... 14
Assessment of the Verification of Constancy of Performance – Details for
AVCP ...................................................................................................................... 21

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 4/21

1 SCOPE OF THE EAD

1.1 Description of the construction product

This EAD covers couplers for mechanical splices of reinforcing steel bars for concrete (in the following
referred to as couplers) with sizes ranging from 8 to 50 mm with the following property:
As,nom,bar·Re,nom,bar ≤ As,nom,coupler·Re,nom,coupler
The load bearing parts of the couplers are completely made of steel or cast steel.
Types of couplers are standard couplers or e.g. position couplers, bridging couplers or transition couplers.
Positional couplers are used to join two bars when neither bar can be rotated and/or connect bars whose
ends are at a defined maximum distance from each other. For the situation when rebars cannot be rotated
but can move axially and only the coupler can rotate, there should be left-hand thread on one bar and
corresponding side of the coupler and right-hand thread on the opposite bar and corresponding side of
coupler.
Transition couplers connect bars of different diameters.
Below is a selection of couplers as examples, different thread designs (e.g. tapered) and coupler designs
are possible.

Figure 1.1: Standard coupler

Figure 1.2: Positional coupler

Figure 1.3: Transition coupler

The product is not covered by a harmonised European standard (hEN).


Concerning product packaging, transport, storage, maintenance, replacement and repair it is the
responsibility of the manufacturer to undertake the appropriate measures and to advise his clients on the
transport, storage, maintenance, replacement and repair of the product as he considers necessary.
It is assumed that all couplers will be installed according to the manufacturer’s instructions or (in absence
of such instructions) according to the usual practice of the building professionals.
Relevant manufacturer’s stipulations having influence on the performance of the product covered by this
European Assessment Document shall be considered for the determination of the performance and
detailed in the ETA.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 5/21

1.2 Information on the intended use of the construction product

1.2.1 Intended use

The couplers are intended to be used for mechanical splices of reinforcing steel bars for concrete
structures designed according to EN 1992-1-11 and EN 1998-1 for:
• Transfer of axial tension and/or compression forces of the connected bars according to EN 1992-1-1,
Clause 8.7 and 8.8(4)
• Limitation of slip according to EN 1992-1-1, Clause 7.3
• Resistance to high-cycle fatigue loading according to EN 1992-1-1, Clause 6.8.4
• Resistance to low-cycle seismic loading according to EN 1998-1, Clause 5.6.3(2)
This EAD covers the following specifications of the intended use:
• Connection between reinforcing bars avoiding lapped splicing
• Mechanical splices of reinforcing steel bars with a nominal yield strength of
400 MPa  Re,nom  600 MPa and of ductility classes B or C according to EN 1992-1-1, Clause C.1
• Mechanical splices of reinforcing steel bars positioned such that the concrete cover complies with the
provisions according to EN 1992-1-1, Clause 4.4.1

1.2.2 Working life/Durability

The assessment methods included or referred to in this EAD have been written based on the
manufacturer’s request to take into account a working life of the product for the intended use of 100 years
when installed in the works (provided that the product is subject to appropriate installation (see 1.1)) These
provisions are based upon the current state of the art and the available knowledge and experience.
When assessing the product the intended use as foreseen by the manufacturer shall be taken into account.
The real working life may be, in normal use conditions, considerably longer without major degradation
affecting the basic requirements for works 2.
The indications given as to the working life of the construction product cannot be interpreted as a
guarantee neither given by the product manufacturer or his representative nor by EOTA when drafting this
EAD nor by the Technical Assessment Body issuing an ETA based on this EAD, but are regarded only as
a means for expressing the expected economically reasonable working life of the product.

1.3 Specific terms used in this EAD (if necessary in addition to the definitions in
CPR, Art 2)

1.3.1 Abbreviations

Symbol Unit Designation


Agt,act % Actual total elongation at maximum tensile force in the
spliced bars in case of failure inside the the length of
the mechanical splice
Agt,nom % Nominal total elongation at maximum tensile force of
the reinforcing bar
Re,nom,bar MPa Nominal yield strength of the reinforcing bar
Re,nom,coupler MPa Nominal yield strength of the coupler

1 All undated references to standards or to EADs in this EAD are to be understood as references to the dated versions
listed in clause 4.
2 The real working life of a product incorporated in a specific works depends on the environmental conditions to which
that works is subject, as well as on the particular conditions of the design, execution, use and maintenance of that works.
Therefore, it cannot be excluded that in certain cases the real working life of the product may also be shorter than
referred to above.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 6/21

Re,act MPa Actual yield strength of the reinforcing bar


Rm,nom MPa Nominal tensile strength of the reinforcing bar
Rm,act MPa Actual tensile strength of the reinforcing bar
AS,nom,bar mm² Nominal cross-sectional area of the reinforcing bar
AS,nom,coupler mm² Nominal cross-sectional area of the coupler
AS,act mm² Actual area of the reinforcing bar
Fact kN Actual maximum force in tensile test
Fe,nom kN Nominal force in low-cycle loading test
AS,nom,bar * Re,nom,bar
Fu kN Ultimate tensile load after the low-cycle loading
fu,min,bar,outside MPa Minimum strength at failure outside the splice length
(failure of rebar)
fu,min,bar,inside MPa Minimum strength at failure inside the splice length
(shear of thread, failure of the rebar inside the coupler,
bar pull-out out of the coupler)
fu,min,coupler MPa Minimum strength at failure of the coupler
k1, k2 - Stress exponent for S-N-curve
Rsk MPa Characteristic fatigue strength for N* load cycles
Rsk,n=210 6 MPa Characteristic fatigue strength for 2·106 load cycles
N - Specified number of load cycles in fatigue test
N* - Number of load cycles in fatigue test at the kink point of
S-N-curve
(Rm/Re)k - Tensile/yield strength ratio
d mm Nominal diameter of the reinforcing bar
d mm Difference between maximum and minimum diameter
of reinforcing bar range
L mm Length of the mechanical splice
L1 mm Coupler length
L2 mm 2·d
L3 mm Minimum free length for measurement of Agt,act
Lg mm Gauge length for measurement of slip
L0 mm Gauge length in the low-cycle loading test
S mm Slip
s1 mm Slip under initial loading
s2 mm Slip after unloading
y % Strain at nominal yield strength
1 % 2 y strain of the reinforcing bar, measured over L0
2 % 5 y strain of the reinforcing bar, measured over L 0
max MPa Upper stress level for the high-cycle fatigue test
2·a MPa Stress range for the high-cycle fatigue test
u20 mm Difference between the average of residual elongation
after 20 cycles in low-cycle loading test and those of an
unspliced reference length of the same bar, measured
on the same gauge length

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 7/21

1.3.2 Definitions

coupler
coupling sleeve or threaded coupler for mechanical splicing of reinforcing bars for the purpose of providing
transfer of axial tension and/or compression from one bar to the other

mechanical splice
complete assembly of a coupler, including other components providing a splice of two reinforcing bars

coupler length
actual length of the coupler including all load-transferring parts

length of mechanical splice


coupler length plus two times the nominal bar diameter at both ends of the coupler

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 8/21

2 ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS AND RELEVANT ASSESSMENT METHODS


AND CRITERIA

2.1 Essential characteristics of the product

Table 2.1 shows how the performance of the mechanical couplers is assessed in relation to the essential
characteristics.
Table 2.1 Essential characteristic of the product and methods and criteria for assessing the
performance of the product in relation to those essential characteristics

Type of expression of product


No Essential characteristic Assessment method
performance

Basic Works Requirement 1: Mechanical resistance and stability


Level:
fu,min,bar,outside [MPa]
Resistance to static or or
1 2.2.2
quasi-static loading fu,min,bar,inside [MPa]; Agt,act [%]
or
fu,min,coupler [MPa]; Agt,act [%]
Slip under static or quasi- Level:
2 2.2.3
static load s1 [mm]
Slip after static or quasi- Level:
3 2.2.3
static loading s2 [mm]
Fatigue strength for Level
4 2.2.4
N = 2·106 load cycles Rsk,n=2106 [MPa]
Fatigue strength for S-N
Level
5 curve with k1 [-] and k2 [-] 2.2.4
Rsk [MPa]; k1 [-] and k2 [-]
according to EN 1992-1-1
Fatigue strength for S-N
Level
6 curve with specific k1 [-] and 2.2.4
Rsk [MPa]; k1 [-] and k2 [-]
k2 [-]
Level:
Resistance to low cycle u20 [mm]
7 2.2.5
loading (seismic actions) and
Fu [kN]

Basic Works Requirement 2: Safety in case of fire


8 Reaction to fire 2.2.6 Class

2.2 Methods and criteria for assessing the performance of the product in relation to
essential characteristics of the product

2.2.1 General

This chapter is intended to provide instructions for TABs. Therefore, the use of wordings such as “shall be
stated in the ETA” or “it has to be given in the ETA” shall be understood only as such instructions for TABs
on how results of assessments shall be presented in the ETA. Such wordings do not impose any
obligations for the manufacturer and the TAB shall not carry out the assessment of the performance in
relation to a given essential characteristic when the manufacturer does not wish to declare this
performance in the Declaration of Performance.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 9/21

For a same system, if various types of splices are very similar and use identical components, the Technical
Assessment Body may decide not to test all of them. For example fatigue tests may be more critical for
transition or positional couplers rather than for standard couplers.

2.2.2 Resistance to static or quasi-static loading

The resistance to static or quasi static loading according to Table 2.2 is determined by means of testing.
The tests shall be performed and evaluated according to the method given in Table 2.2.
Table 2.2 Resistance to static and quasi-static loading
number of samples test method expression of
No characteristic
per type of coupler and evaluation performance
fu,min,bar,outside [MPa]
or
≥ 3 for min d
fu,min,bar,inside [MPa];
Minimum force at failure due to ≥ 3 for medium d Agt,act [%]
1 Annex A.3
tension loading (where d> 10 mm)
or
≥ 3 for max d
fu,min,coupler [MPa] ];
Agt,act [%]

2.2.3 Slip under or after static or quasi-static loading

The slip according to Table 2.3 shall be determined by means of testing. The tests shall be performed
according to the method given in Table 2.3.
Table 2.3 Slip
number of samples test method expression of
No characteristic
per type of coupler and evaluation performance
≥ 3 for min d Average of all s1, s2
≥ 3 for medium d values per type for
1 Slip at specific load level Annex A.4
(where d> 10 mm) each tested size
≥ 3 for max d [mm]

2.2.4 Resistance to high cycle fatigue loading

The fatigue strength according to Table 2.4 shall be determined by means of testing. The tests shall be
performed according to the method given in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4 Resistance to high cycle fatigue loading
number of samples test method expression of
No characteristic
per type of coupler and evaluation performance
≥ 3 for min d
Fatigue strength for N = 2·106 ≥ 3 for medium d
1 Annex A.5 Rsk,n=210°6 [MPa]
load cycles (where d> 10 mm)
≥ 3 for max d
≥ 3 for min d
Fatigue strength for S-N curve Rsk [MPa];
≥ 3 for medium d
2 with k1 [-] and k2 [-] according to Annex A.5
(where d> 10 mm) k1 [-] and k2 [-]
EN 1992-1-1
≥ 3 for max d
Fatigue strength for S-N curve ≥ 24 with most Rsk [MPa];
3 Annex A.5
with specific k1 [-] and k2 [-] unfavourable d k1 [-] and k2 [-]

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 10/21

2.2.5 Resistance to low cycle loading (seismic actions)

The resistance according to Table 2.5 shall be determined by means of testing. The tests shall be
performed according to the method given in Table 2.5.
Table 2.5 Characteristic resistance to low cycle loading (seismic actions)
number of samples test method expression of
No characteristic
per type of coupler and evaluation performance
≥ 3 for min d
Strain value and ultimate
≥ 3 for medium d
1 strength – Alternating tension Annex A.6 u20 [mm]; Fu [kN]
(where d> 10 mm)
and compression test
≥ 3 for max d

2.2.6 Reaction to fire

The product is considered to satisfy the requirements for performance class A1 of the characteristic
reaction to fire in accordance with the Commission Decision 96/603/EC, as amended by Commission
Decisions 2000/605/EC and 2003/424/EC, without the need for testing on the basis of it fulfilling the
conditions set out in that Decision and its intended use being covered by that Decision.
Therefore, the performance of the product is class A1.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 11/21

3 ASSESSMENT AND VERIFICATION OF CONSTANCY OF PERFORMANCE

3.1 System(s) of assessment and verification of constancy of performance to be


applied

For the products covered by this EAD the applicable European legal act is Commission Decision
2000/606/EC.

The system is 1+.

3.2 Tasks of the manufacturer

The cornerstones of the actions to be undertaken by the manufacturer of the mechanical couplers in the
procedure of assessment and verification of constancy of performance are laid down in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 Control plan for the manufacturer; cornerstones
Test or Minimum
Criteria, Minimum frequency
No Subject/type of control control number of
if any of control
method samples

Factory production control (FPC)

Raw material – mechanical 1) every heat of


1 Clause 3.4
characteristics (inspection certificate) material
every 25002) pieces
2 Coupler - tensile strength Clause 3.4 1) 1 per size of each batch or per
each batch3)
Coupler - dimension and tolerances
every 500 pieces of
(diameter, length of the sleeve; 1)
3 Clause 3.4 1 per size each batch or per
diameter, length and pitch for thread of
each batch3)
sleeve and of rebar)
1) according to the control plan
2) After successful results of continuous testing during the first year of production, the test frequency may be
reduced to one every 5000.
3) whichever criterion is the more rigorous

3.3 Tasks of the notified body

The cornerstones of the actions to be undertaken by the notified body in the procedure of assessment and
verification of constancy of performance for the mechanical couplers are laid down in Table 3.2.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 12/21

Table 3.2 Control plan for the notified body; cornerstones


Minimum Minimum
Test or control Criteria,
No Subject/type of control number of frequency of
method if any
samples control

Initial inspection of the manufacturing plant and of factory production control

The notified body shall ascertain that, in


accordance with the control plan, the
manufacturing plant of the product When
manufacturer, in particular personnel and starting the
equipment and the factory production 1) production
1 - -
control are suitable to ensure a or a new
continuous and orderly manufacturing of production
the mechanical coupler. In particular it line
shall be checked if all tasks given in
Table 3.1 were performed.3)

Continuous surveillance, assessment and evaluation of factory production control

It shall be verified that the system of


factory production control and the
specified manufacturing process are 1 per year
maintained taking account of the control - 1) -
2 for each
plan. In particular it shall be checked if all factory
tasks given in Table 3.1 were
performed.3)
Audit-testing of samples taken by the notified product certification body at the manufacturing plant or
at the manufacturer’s storage facilities
3 for one
3 Tensile strength Clause 3.4 1) size per 1 per year
type2)
3 for one
4 High-cycle fatigue Clause 3.4 1) size per 1 per year
type2)
1 for one
5 Low-cycle loading Clause 3.4 1) size per 1 per year
type2)
1 for one
6 Slip Clause 3.4 1) size per 1 per year
type 2)

3 for one
7 Dimension and tolerances Clause 3.4 1) size per 1 per year
type2)
1) as defined in the control plan
2) all sizes shall be tested within a period of 5 years
3) If the product criteria in Table3.1 are observed, it is not necessary to monitor specific stages of
production.

3.4 Special methods of control and testing used for the assessment and verification
of constancy of performance

The methods of control and testing are given in Annex B.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 13/21

4 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

EN 1990:2005 Eurocode - Basis of structural design

EN 1992-1-1:2004 Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for
buildings
Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance –
EN 1998-1:2004
Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings

EN ISO 9513:2012 Metallic materials – Calibration of extensometers used in uniaxial testing

EN 10204:2014 Metallic products - Types of inspection documents

EN ISO 15630-1:2019 Steel for the reinforcement and prestressing of concrete – Test methods –
Part 1: Reinforcing bars, wire rod and wire

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 14/21

DETAILS OF TESTS AND EVALUATION OF THE TEST RESULTS

A.1 General

All the dimensions with tolerances and material properties of load bearing parts of the coupler have to be
determined before testing according to table 2.2 to 2.5.
In the tests, the yield strength and the ductility of the coupler parts raw material have to be reported. If the
raw material properties of the coupler parts are modified (e.g. forming), then additional relevant testing on
those parts (e.g. hardness, tensile strength) shall be performed and reported.
If the diameters given in table 2.2.to 2.5 do not cover those cases where material or geometrical properties
are most unfavourable in terms of strength, ductility, slip and fatigue strength, then these sizes shall be
considered in the tests accordingly. The diameters which are not tested should be verified by affinity.
The procedure of testing the manufacturing and the installation safety of a mechanical coupler type shall
take into account any variations which may occur at the place of production and on site. The parameters
to be investigated are defined on the basis of the tolerances specified by the manufacturer in each
individual case referring to the manufacturer's instruction respectively for the rebar preparation and for the
splice assembly or installation.
Before carrying out the tests, it is necessary to verify that the tested sizes are unfavourable in terms of
strength, ductility, slip and fatigue strength. In most of the cases the largest diameter is unfavourable in
terms of slip and fatigue strength. Examples are:
(1) Unfavourable geometrical and material tolerances of the mechanical couplers and the reinforcing bars
(2) Lateral offset of the reinforcing bars referring to the coupler longitudinal axis
(3) Longitudinal outwards offset of the reinforcing bars referring to the coupler longitudinal axis
(4) Angular misalignment of the reinforcing bars longitudinal axis referring to the coupler longitudinal axis
(5) Inaccurate processing (e.g. low turning moment, imperfect pressing)

Example to
clause 2

Example to
clause3

Example to
clause 4

Figure A.1 Examples of deviations

A.2 Test specimens

The specimens shall be prepared according to the installation instructions from the supplier of the
mechanical coupler and according to the relevant parameters see clause A.1.
The specimens for the tensile tests shall be sufficiently long to ensure a free length between the grips of
the testing machine to allow the determination of Agt. The following free lengths are the minimum required
lengths:
i. For d < 25 mm: free length = 400 mm + length of mechanical splice
ii. For d  25 mm: free length = 350 mm + 2 x d + length of mechanical splice
The specimens for the fatigue tests shall be sufficiently long to ensure a free length between the grips of
testing machine, which is larger than the length of the mechanical splice.
The coupler or coupling sleeve should be positioned in the middle of the test piece.
The reinforcing bars shall be portion of the same bar, or at least from the same casting.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 15/21

Figure A.2 Definition of lengths for measurement of elongations of the mechanical splice

A.3 Resistance to static or quasi-static loading

For the diameters according to Table 2.2 at least 3 tests until failure shall be performed.
The test specimens for the slip test may also be used for this test.
The tests shall be carried out according to EN ISO 15630-1.
3 modes of failure, or a combination thereof, are possible:
a) Failure of the reinforcing steel bar outside the length of the mechanical splice
b) Failure of the reinforcing steel bar inside the length of the mechanical splice
c) Failure of the coupler
The resistance is the minimum failure load of all tests.
For failure mode a) the resistance is fu,min,bar,outside [MPa].
For failure mode b) the resistance is fu,min,bar,inside [MPa]
For failure mode c) the resistance is fu,min,coupler [MPa]
In addition, for failure modes b) and c) the rupture elongation Agt,act shall be measured according to
EN ISO 15630-1 at the part of the reinforcing steel bar which is ruptured outside the splice. If this is not
possible, Agt,act may be measured on a separate bar of the same heat at the same load level as the spliced
bar and from the same length which was used in the coupled assembly.

A.4 Slip under or after static or quasi-static loading

General

Slip is the relative displacement of the reinforcing bar to the end of the mechanical coupler and / or of two
different components of the coupler itself under defined load (see A.4.3).
The slip shall be measured at both ends of the coupler or coupling sleeve. If both ends of the coupler or
coupling sleeve are identical, a slip measurement at one side is sufficient. lf the coupler or coupling sleeve
consists of more than one load transferring part, either an additional slip measurement between each load
carrying part shall be performed or the slip shall be measured across the whole splice.
The slip is the overall slip of the mechanical splice, i.e. to the sum of all relative displacements.
Slip measurement and determination shall be performed according to A.4.1.1 or A.4.1.2.

A.4.1.1. Slip under load s1

The slip s1 across the mechanical splice shall be measured and determined under initial loading of
0,6·Re,nom·As,nom according to one of the described procedures A.4.4 to A.4.6 (equivalent test procedures).
In case of dispute, procedure 2 according to Clause A.4.5 shall be used as reference procedure.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 16/21

A.4.1.2. Slip after unloading s2

The slip s2 across the mechanical splice shall be measured after unloading from a load level of
0,6·Re,nom·As,nom until a load level of 0,02·Re,nom·As,nom. The slip s2 shall be determined as the measured
length of the mechanical splice after unloading minus the length measured prior to loading minus the
elastic elongation of the unspliced bar under the stress at load release.

Test equipment

The tensile testing machine to be used shall comply with clause 5.2 of EN ISO 15630-1.
The slip shall be measured with an accuracy of at least 0.01 mm. The extensometers shall be of class 1
or better according to EN ISO 9513, Table 2.
3 extensometers shall be used, arranged in the same plane at 120° from each other, as close to the axis
of the specimen as possible. The slip value shall be reported as the average of the 3 measurements.

Test procedure

The slip measurement should be carried out without any pre-loading, as the latter would distort the slip
measurement. In any case, any pre-loading stress, which could not be avoided when clamping the sample
to the testing apparatus, should be less than 0,02·Re,nom·As,nom.
The specimen is gripped in such a way that the load is transmitted axially and as much as possible free
of bending moment on the whole length of the specimen.

0,6 Re,nom

0,02 Re,nom
t

Figure A.3 Slip test procedure for s1 and s2

The slip and the stress shall be measured continuously. The force to be applied shall be determined using
the nominal cross-sectional area of the reinforcing bar and shall not be differ more than ± 3% of
0,6·Re,nom·As,nom.
The recommended maximum speed of loading is 500 MPa/min.

Procedure 1

The measurement between the end of the coupler or coupling sleeve and the reinforcing bar shall be
performed. The slip is the difference between the measured elongation sG and either the theoretical elastic
elongation sth of the unspliced bar over the gauge length or the actual elongation of the unspliced bar
measured on a reference bar. The slip shall be measured at both ends of the coupler or coupling sleeve.
If both ends of the coupler or coupling sleeve are identical, a slip measurement at one side is sufficient.
s = sG – sth

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 17/21

≤4d
sG

≤4d

sG

Figure A.4 Slip measurement – Procedure 1

Procedure 2

The slip sG shall be measured overall and from one end of the coupler or coupling sleeve to the other. The
slip s is the difference between the measured elongation sG, the measured elongation sc of the coupler or
coupling sleeve and either the theoretical elastic elongation sth of the unspliced bar over the actual length
of rebar included in the gauge length or the actual elongation of the actual length of rebar included in the
gauge length, measured on a reference bar. s = sG – sC - sth
2-5d

sG
sC
2-5d

Figure A.5 Slip measurement – Procedure 2

Procedure 3:

The slip shall be measured from the end of the coupler or coupling sleeve to the opposite reinforcing bar
and from one end of the coupler or coupling sleeve to the other. The slip is the difference between the
measured elongation sG, the measured elongation of the coupler or coupling sleeve sC and either the
theoretical elastic elongation sth of the unspliced bar over the actual length of rebar included in the gauge
length or the actual elongation of the actual length of rebar included in the gauge length, measured on a
reference bar. s = sG – sC - sth

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 18/21

≤4d
sG sG
sC
≤4d

Figure A.6 Slip measurement – Procedure 3

A.5 Resistance to high-cycle fatigue loading

General

The tests shall be carried out according to EN ISO 15630-1, clause 8, with the following modifications:
• The free length of the specimen shall be chosen as described in clause A.2
• If the specimen fails in the grips of the testing machine or within a distance of 2·d of the grips and the
mechanical coupler is still intact, the test may be continued after re-gripping the specimen with the
same stress range, if the minimum free length is still available.
• The tests shall be performed with an upper stress level (max) of 0,6·Re,nom.
• The maximum frequency shall be 200 Hz. For frequencies higher than 60 Hz, it shall be checked that
the surface temperature of the sample does not exceed 40°C during the test.

Fatigue strength for N = 2·106 load cycles

For the diameters according to Table 2.4 at least 3 load-cycle tests according to A.5.1 with a certain stress
range of s = 2·a [MPa] and at least N = 2·106 load cycles shall be performed.
All steel grades of coupler and rebar material specified by the manufacturer shall be tested. Steels of the
same grade but different ductility class do not need to be both tested.
The value 2·a may be specified by the manufacturer. The minimum stress range in the tests should be
s = 2·a = 60 MPa based on the nominal cross section of the bar.
If in all 9 tests no fracture occurs up to N = 2·106 load cycles the characteristic stress range Rs,k shall
be determined as follows:
Rsk,n=2106 = 0.78·(2·a) [MPa]
If a fracture occurs before reaching N = 2·106 load cycles the test series shall be repeated with a smaller
value 2·a [MPa].
If no fracture occurs in 3 further tests on a reduced stress level, the stress range Rsk,n=2106 shall be
determined as shown before.

Fatigue strength for S-N curve with k1 [-] and k2 [-] according to EN 1992-1-1

For each diameter according to Table 2.4 at least 3 load-cycle tests according to A.5.1 shall be performed,
one test each with stress range 95 MPa, 75 MPa and 50 MPa.
If the splices sustain without fracture 0.5 million cycles at a stress range of 95 MPa, 1 million cycles at a
stress range of 75 MPa and 3.5 million cycles at 50 MPa, the S-N curve according to EN 1992-1-1, Table
6.3N applies also for the couplers.
The values k1 and k2 according to EN 1992-1-1, Table 6.3N shall be stated in the ETA.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 19/21

Fatigue strength for S-N curve with specific k1 [-] and k2 [-]

For the most unfavourable diameter at least 24 tests according to A.5.1 shall be performed in order to
determine a complete S-N curve.

Figure A.7 S-N curve

All tests shall be carried out until the fracture of the specimen or until 10 million load cycles are reached.
The S-N curve shall be determined with respect to the following restrictions:
i. The 5-% and the 95-% quantile of the declining part of the S-N-curve (finite fatigue life range) have
to be evaluated at a confidence level of 75 %, according to EN 1990.
ii. The stress ranges have to be distributed evenly in the finite fatigue life range.
ii. In the infinite fatigue life range the stress exponent k 2 according to EN 1992-1-1 has to be applied
to consider long term effects.
iv. Another possibility is to test only the finite fatigue life range as given in i. - up to two million load
cycles and to estimate the following stress exponents to get a complete S-N curve.
a) If the determined stress exponent k 1 is less than the exponent according to EN 1992-1-1, then the
stress exponent k1 determined in the tests shall be applied in the range from 2 million to 10 million load
cycles, followed by the stress exponent k 2 = 2k1 -1.
b) If the determined stress exponent k 1 is greater than the exponent according to EN 1992-1-1, then
the stress exponent k 1 according to EN 1992-1-1 shall be applied in the range from 2 million to 10 million
load cycles, followed by the stress exponent k 2 according to EN 1992-1-1.
The 5 % quantile of the S-N curve (Rsk at N*; k1, k2) shall be given at a confidence level of 75 %.

A.6 Resistance to low-cycle loading (seismic actions)

General

Two extensometers are required to perform this test.


- First gauge to measure the bar strain , shall be placed on the L3 portion of the reinforcing bar
(see Figure A.2) with a gauge length L0.
- Second gauge used to measure the residual elongation u 20 (measured after step 1 according to
Clause A.6.2 and Figure A.8), shall be placed across the mechanical splice with the gauge length
Lg.
For the bars made of steels without a clear yield strain, y may be taken as a strain equal the 0.2 % limit.
When deciding on the length of the specimen bars, the effective length of the reinforcing bars should be
taken into account.
For the diameters according to Table 2.5 at least 3 tests in accordance with the loading program (A.6.2)
shall be performed.
The resistance Fu is the minimum failure load of all tests.

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 20/21

Alternating tension and compression test

Loading program:
- Step 1: From zero stress to + 0.9·Fe,nom down to - 0.5·Fe,nom, alternating 20 times,
- Step 2: Up to twice the calculated strain at nominal yield load in tension (1), followed by
downloading to a strain corresponding to the stress - 0.5·Fe,nom, alternating 4 times,
- Step 3: Thereafter up to five times the calculated strain at nominal yield load in tension (2),
followed by downloading to a strain corresponding to the stress - 0.5·Fe,nom, alternating 4 times,
- Step 4: Tensioning the specimen to failure.
Both residual deformation u20 and ultimate strength Fu shall be recorded.

0,9 Fe,nom

1 L 2 L

-0,5 Fe,nom

Figure A.8 Load cycle diagram for the load-cycle loading test

©EOTA 2021
European Assessment Document – EAD 160129-00-0301 21/21

ASSESSMENT OF THE VERIFICATION OF CONSTANCY OF


PERFORMANCE – DETAILS FOR AVCP

B.1 General

The different types of the mechanical coupler shall be considered. If various types of mechanical couplers
are composed of identical coupling components, the notified body may decide that it is not necessary to
test all of them in the course of FPC.

B.2 Raw material

The raw materials shall be subject to control and tests by the manufacturer before acceptance. Check of
raw materials shall include control of the inspection documents presented by the supplies of the initial
materials (comparison with nominal values).
The raw materials shall be supplied with the following documents:
Couplers: Material and material properties to be proven by an inspection certificate 3.1
according to EN 10204 or equivalent
Reinforcement: Material and material properties to be proven by an inspection certificate 3.1
according to EN 10204 or equivalent

B.3 Fatigue strength

High-cycle fatigue

Criteria for Rsk,n=2106 :


Load-cycle tests with a upper level of up = 0.6 Re,nom, a stress level of Rsk,n=2106/0.78 and at least
N = 2·106 load cycles shall be performed. The test setup shall correspond to A.5.1.

Criteria for S-N curve:


The following conditions shall be observed additional to section A.5.4 for the testing of the fatigue strength:
The specimens have to be tested with two different stress ranges in the finite fatigue life range.
The diameters have to be tested are to be varied annually in order to check the complete range of the
diameters within a period of 5 years.
The location and the kind of the rupture shall be recorded.
Ruptures have to occur above the 5-% quantile of the S-N-curve determined according to A.5.3 or A.5.4.
Otherwise an additional test has to be carried out directly.

Low-cycle loading

The test setup shall correspond to A.6.1 and tests shall be performed according to A.6.2.

©EOTA 2021

You might also like