0% found this document useful (0 votes)
165 views11 pages

Leaching of Coal Fly Ash by Sulphuric Acid For The Synthesis of Wastewater Treatment Polymeric Coagulant

Coal fly ash (CFA) sample produced in coalburning power plants contains significant quantities of oxides of aluminium
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
165 views11 pages

Leaching of Coal Fly Ash by Sulphuric Acid For The Synthesis of Wastewater Treatment Polymeric Coagulant

Coal fly ash (CFA) sample produced in coalburning power plants contains significant quantities of oxides of aluminium
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165

Leaching of Coal Fly Ash by Sulphuric Acid for the


Synthesis of Wastewater Treatment Polymeric
Coagulant
M. Clotilde Apua
School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering,
University of the Witwatersrand,
Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract:- Coal fly ash (CFA) sample produced in coal- flowable fill [11], manufacture of ceramics and glass [12,13],
burning power plants contains significant quantities of soil stabilization [14,15], catalysts and catalyst supports
oxides of aluminium, iron and other important elements [16,17], wastewater treatments as an adsorbent for organic
such as magnesium, silicon and calcium for the production removal [18,19], and extraction of metals [20,21].
of coagulant for wastewater treatment. In order to
synthesize a coagulant, the dissolution of these CFA However, despite the various uses listed above, there is
elements was studied in sulphuric acid (H 2SO4) solutions. still a need to discover other means of using CFA productively
The impacts of dissolution time, H2SO4 concentration, in order to protect the environment and to reduce its disposal
temperature and solid/liquid ratio were investigated for on land [22]. Currently, CFA has promising uses in
the leaching process. The treated CFA samples were wastewater treatment due to its physical properties such as
characterized by PSD, XRD, XRF, FTIR and SEM. surface area and porosity, and the presence of chemical
Thermodynamic feasibility was studied using components such as aluminium and iron oxides. The main
Hydra/Medusa software. The dissolution efficiencies of chemical components of CFA are aluminium, iron, calcium,
aluminium, iron, magnesium, silicon and calcium were silicon and magnesium oxides. Iron and aluminium oxides are
33.86, 57.90, 73.21, 11.12 and 25.43%, respectively, in 1.5 important raw materials for the production of coagulants for
M H2SO4, with a pH ranging from 0.5 to 3.9, at 300 rpm, the treatment of wastewater through the coagulation process. It
150 °C, a solid/liquid ratio of 0.20 and a leaching time of 6 is notable that over the years, most coagulant companies have
hours. The PSD results revealed that particle size changes used ores or chemical salts of aluminium and iron as raw
happened during the leaching process, XRD and FTIR materials. Nevertheless, aluminium and iron minerals or
showed the presence of the same mineral phases in the raw chemical salts of iron and aluminium are expensive [23].
and treated CFA samples, and SEM indicated that both a Moreover, several researchers have studied the role of other
porous structure and a stem-like structure were formed elements, such us silicon, magnesium and calcium ions, as
after leaching. The generated dissolution solution potential coagulants for wastewater treatment [24–26]. Coal
containing polymeric sulphates of aluminium, iron, fly ash also contains several other strategic elements, some of
magnesium, silicon and calcium can be utilized as which (silicon, magnesium and calcium) could be extracted
coagulant in the treatment of wastewater. The process can together with aluminium and iron. Thus, CFA has become an
be easily adopted to synthesize complex coagulant, important resource for the synthesis of coagulants and
therefore decreasing CFA pollution and producing a researchers are more interested in this study currently [2].
valuable coagulant. Therefore, the use of CFA to make composite (polymeric)
coagulants can provide significant cost savings, as CFA is
Keywords:- Synthesis; Pressure sulphuric acid-leaching; Coal much cheaper than industrial grade iron or aluminium ores. In
fly ash; Coagulant; Wastewater. addition, such a concept of using these by-products would
reduce the environmental degradation resulting from storage
I. INTRODUCTION and disposal techniques currently used in several countries
[23].
Energy production from coal combustion at 1200–1700
°C generates considerable by-products that create serious Therefore, the aim of this research was to use CFA, a
storage and/or disposal management issues [1]. These by- known source of solid waste currently increasing worldwide,
products consist of bottom ash, fly ash and slag. These waste which is available in South Africa, as synthesis raw material to
by-products are normally dumped and/or disposed of, but produce a polymeric coagulant for wastewater treatment. This
therefore pollute the environment. Due to the limited paper presents a process for the synthesis of a composite
commercial uses of coal fly ash (CFA), in particular, extensive coagulant by direct pressure leaching of aluminium, iron and
research has been conducted to discover some alternative uses other strategic elements from CFA in H2SO4 solution. The
[2,3]. study on the performance of the synthesized CFA-based
coagulant in wastewater treatment is discussed elsewhere [27].
At present, research has shown that only a small part of
the total CFA production (20–30%) is utilized in the following
applications: synthesis of geopolymers [4,5], asphalt filler [3],
production of zeolites [6], substitute material for cement [7],
adsorbent of single contaminants in flue gases [8–10],

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 465


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
II. EXPERIMENTAL (Al5.65Si0.35O9.175). The elemental analysis of the CFA was
carried out using a Rigaku ZSX Primus II X-ray fluorescence
A. Sample characterization (XRF) apparatus and the results are given in Table 1. It is
The CFA sample collected from the electrostatic shown that the CFA contains Fe2O3 (4.16%), Al2O3 (32.15%),
precipitators at the Kendal power station located in SiO2 (49.92%). CaO (6.25%), and MgO (1.40%). The
Mpumalanga province, South Africa. High purity H2SO4 was morphology of the CFA presented in Fig. 3 was performed
used for the dissolution tests. The particle size distribution using a TESCAN scanning electron microscope (SEM) and it
(PSD) was measured by a Microtrac S3500 laser-based was observed that CFA particles have smooth spherical
particle size analyser and the results are displayed in Fig. 1. surfaces. While the CFA pattern was performed using a
PSD with a P80 particle diameter of 49 µm was found. Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS10 spectrometer (wavenumber
Mineralogical analysis was carried out using a Rigaku Ultima region of 500–4000 cm-1) and the results are shown in Fig. 4
IV Model X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and the pattern is which reveals the presence of Si–O, Al–O, P=O, and O–H
shown in Fig. 2. The major crystalline phases present in the groups in the sample.
sample are quartz (SiO2), hematite (Fe2O3), and mullite

Fig. 1: Curve of particle size distribution of coal fly ash sample.

Fig. 2: XRD pattern of coal fly ash. Q, M, and H indicate quartz (SiO2), mullite (Al5.65Si0.35O9.175),
and hematite (Fe2O3), respectively

Chemical composition Al2O3 Fe2O3 SiO2 CaO TiO2 MgO K2O P2O5
Content (wt%) 32.15 4.16 49.92 6.25 2.15 1.4 1 1.04
Table 1: Chemical composition of coal ash sample

Only important elements from important phases are presented.

Fig. 3: SEM of the coal fly ash showing smooth spheres

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 466


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

Fig. 4: FTIR spectrum for coal fly ash

B. Coagulant synthesis dissolution parameters selected from the chemical equilibrium


Dissolution process was conducted in a 750 mL high diagrams in Fig. 5 were: pH 0.5 to 3.9.
pressure reactor. 40 g of CFA and required amounts of H2SO4
solution were used for the leaching, while the stirring of the Generally, aqueous equilibrium reactions of iron and
slurry was performed using of a magnetic stirrer. Dissolution aluminium in H2SO4 media are given in (1) – (6) [28–30]. In
parameters such as H2SO4 concentration from 0.5 to 6.0 M, aqueous H2SO4 solutions given in (6), iron distributes as Fe(II)
temperature range of 25 to 190 °C, solid/liquid (S/L) ratio and Fe(III) soluble species such as free ions (Fe2+ and Fe3+) or
from 0.17 to 0.40, and leaching time from 1 to 6 hours, were complex compounds [FeSO40, FeSO4+, Fe(SO4)2—] as
investigated to obtain optimal experimental conditions. For the illustrated in (1) – (3) [31,32]. Aluminium, on the other hand,
effect of temperature, the reaction begins when the goes into solution as Al (III) species such as simple cations
temperature reaches the selected value. A sample of the leach (Al3+) or charged complexes [AlSO4+, Al(SO4)2—] as presented
residue was washed three times with deionized water, oven in (4) and (5) [33]. The concentrations of iron and aluminium
dried at 50 °C overnight, re-ground and analyzed by PSD, are highly dependent on the initial total amount of iron,
XRD, XRF, FTIR and SEM. Leaching recoveries of iron, aluminium, acidity and temperature [32].
aluminium, silicon, magnesium and calcium were calculated,
respectively, in relation to the percentages of iron, aluminium, Fe2+ + SO42— ↔ FeSO40 (1)
silicon, magnesium and calcium in the CFA sample. Fe3+ + SO42— ↔ FeSO4+ (2)

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3+
Fe + 2SO4 2—
↔ Fe(SO4)2 (3)

Batch dissolution tests were carried out for each selected Al3+ + SO42— ↔ AlSO4+ (4)

parameter to study the leaching behaviour of iron, aluminium, 3+
Al + 2SO4 2—
↔ Al(SO4)2 (5)
and other elements from CFA material. The dissolution —
solution used for the leaching of elements from CFA sample
+
H + SO4 2—
↔ HSO4 (6)
was an aqueous solution of H2SO4. A sample of CFA Chemistry of H2SO4 leaching of iron and aluminium
containing 17.01% aluminium and 2.91% iron was used. In from Fe2O3 and Al2O3 in coal fly ash
general, iron and aluminium in CFA are found together with
other elements such as magnesium, silicon, calcium, titanium The aim was to leach iron and aluminium from Fe2O3
and potassium. Among these elements, the dissolutions of and Al2O3, respectively, in the CFA sample with H2SO4
silicon, calcium and magnesium were investigated. solutions. Throughout the leaching of iron and aluminium with
H2SO4, the mechanism that describes complexation of iron and
In this study, aluminium and iron in the CFA sample had aluminium is given by (2) – (6). The overall reactions are
to be leached with H2SO4 to produce their soluble forms. In illustrated in (7) and (8) for iron and aluminium, respectively
order to predict the predominance areas of different aluminium [34].
and iron species in an aqueous solution, Eh-pH diagrams for
the Fe–SO42—–H2O system and Al–SO42—–H2O system at 25 Fe2O3 +3H2SO4 ↔ Fe2(SO4)3 +3H2O (7)
°C (for a solution of total sulphate concentration = 1.5 M)
Al2O3 +3H2SO4 ↔ Al2(SO4)3 +3H2O (8)
were drawn using the Hydra/Medusa software and presented in
Fig. 5. The total sulphate concentrations of 1.5 M were chosen H2SO4 reacts with iron and aluminium in CFA to,
according to diluted H2SO4 solutions. It is noticed from Fig. respectively, produce FeSO4+ and AlSO4+ complexes on the
5(a) that for a 1.5 M total sulphate concentration solution, Fe3+ surface of iron and aluminium metals as illustrated in (2) and
(i.e. FeSO42— complex) is the most predominant species at pH (4). Subsequently, FeSO4+ undergoes another complexation
below 3.9 and Eh between 0.67 and 1.00 V; hydrolysis of with the sulphate ion to produce Fe(SO4)2— (3) which passes
Fe(SO4)2— occurs with increasing pH forming species such in solution while AlSO4+ enters in complexation with sulphate
FeS2, Fe2O3, and Fe(HS)3 which are predominant species at pH ion to form Al(SO4)2— which goes into solution (5).
values above 4. Fig. 5(b) shows that leached aluminium Theoretically, the dissolution of iron and aluminium occurs as
species Al3+, AlSO4+ and Al(SO4)2— are stable in the pH presented in (2) – (6) at pH < 3.9. Moreover, the effects of
region below 5 and the Eh range of -1.00 to 1.00 V. Therefore,

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 467


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
reaction parameters on the dissolution of elements in CFA are The effect of H2SO4 concentration on the leaching of
investigated in order to optimize the process. iron, aluminium, silicon, magnesium and calcium at RT was
studied in the range of 0.5 to 6.0 M H2SO4. The results are
A. Effect of time presented in Fig. 7. When the concentration of H2SO4 was
The impact of time on the dissolution of iron, aluminium below 1.5 M, it can be seen that the recovery gradually
and other CFA elements at room temperature (RT = 23±2 °C), increases for iron from 10.83% to 14.96% and for aluminium
was studied in the range of 1 to 6 hours. The results are from 14.08% to 16.00% with the H2SO4 concentration at RT.
presented in Fig. 6. It was mainly noticed that the leaching of Thereafter, with a H2SO4 concentration of 1.5 M, the
iron, aluminium, silicon and magnesium at the concentration recoveries of iron and aluminium reach a plateau. Mainly, it
of 1 M H2SO4 at RT is completed within 1 hour. It is found was observed in Fig. 7 that the dissolution of iron, as well as
that extraction efficiencies of iron, aluminium, silicon and the leaching of aluminium, is completed when 1.5 M H2SO4
magnesium after 1 hour of leaching at RT reached 7.97, 10.25, was used. Within the whole concentration range of H2SO4,
10.21 and 60.15%, respectively, with no calcium reported after magnesium and silicon are also dissolved with iron and
6 hours. Practically, 1 hour of dissolution was found to be aluminium. Maximum recoveries of 42.32 and 11.52% were
optimum. obtained for magnesium and silicon, respectively. No calcium
B. Effect of H2SO4 concentration was detected in the leach solution under these conditions.

Fig. 5: Eh–pH diagram for the (a) Fe–SO42-–H2O system and (b) Al–SO42-–H2O system at 25 °C; Total SO42- concentration = 1.5
M. These diagrams have been drawn using the Hydra/Medusa software.

70

60

50
Recovery (%)

Fe
40 Al
Si
30 Mg

20

10

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Time (hour)

Fig. 6: Effect of time on the leaching of elements from CFA sample


(particle size: −49 µm, RT (23±2 °C), 1 M H2SO4, 300 rpm, S/L = 0.33).

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 468


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

50
45
40
35 Fe
Al
Recovery (%)

30
Si
25
Mg
20
15
10
5
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H2SO4 Concentration (M)

Fig. 7: Effect of H2SO4 concentration on the leaching of elements from CFA sample
(particle size: −49 µm, RT (23±2 °C), 300 rpm, S/L= 0.33, 1 hour)

C. Effect of temperature 0.20, more than 90% of the iron was extracted. A similar trend
Fig. 8 displays the impact of temperature on the was noticed in the dissolutions of aluminium and other
extraction efficiencies of iron, aluminium, silicon, magnesium elements (silicon, magnesium and calcium) for different S/L
and calcium. The major variation in extraction efficiency with ratios under identical conditions. Maximum extraction
temperature change is observed for iron. The CFA sample efficiencies of 28.88, 7.81, 78.67, and 27.11% were obtained
showed a highly variable leaching behaviour of elements at for aluminium, silicon, magnesium and calcium respectively at
different temperatures. When dissolution was performed at a S/L ratio of 0.20. In comparison to the dissolution behaviour
RT, leaching of iron, aluminium, silicon and magnesium was of iron, the low dissolution efficiencies of aluminium and
slower. The extraction efficiency of iron increased silicon (<30%) are probably due to the structure and property
significantly with increasing temperature from 120 °C to 190 of aluminium and silicon oxides in CFA. The mineralogy of
°C, but there was no significant increase at lower CFA is extremely diverse. The identified phase of iron oxide is
temperatures. For aluminium, from 90 °C, the concentration in hematite which can be easily leached in H2SO4 solution [3]. In
solution is 10.72%. There is no obvious change in the CFA, the Al2O3 is found either as crystalline mullite form and
aluminium leaching as the temperature increases from 90 to non-crystalline amorphous form or bound to an
150 °C. Thereafter, the leaching decreases until the aluminosilicate glass matrix [3,37]. The glass matrix and
temperature reaches 190 °C. The fused structure of mullite phase are not easily accessible to direct acid
aluminosilicate is probably the reason for the relatively low dissolution [36].
extraction efficiency of aluminium. A similar behaviour was
also observed by other researchers [35,36]. A temperature of E. Effect of time on optimal experimental conditions
150 °C was considered optimal for aluminium leaching. A The effect of time on optimal experimental conditions
gradual increase in extraction efficiencies was noticed for was investigated and results are presented in Fig.10.
magnesium, calcium and silicon. Maximum extraction Magnesium dissolved faster than iron and aluminium, while
efficiencies of 68.57, 26.09 and 22.07% were obtained for silicon and calcium showed a surprising difference in
magnesium, calcium and silicon, respectively. dissolution behaviour. The concentrations of iron, aluminium,
silicon, magnesium and calcium in the composite coagulant
D. Effect of solid/liquid ratio solution increased with time up to 57.90, 33.86, 11.12, 73.21
Fig. 9 indicates that the S/L ratio has a substantial effect and 25.43% respectively for 6 hours. It is shown that below 3
on the leaching of iron and magnesium than on the leaching of hours of dissolution time, the concentration of iron decreased
other elements with H2SO4. The concentration of iron in the dramatically in the produced complex coagulant solution. This
leaching solution (composite coagulant) increased with can be explained by the dissolution and precipitation of iron,
increasing S/L ratio from 0.17 to 0.20, then significantly which can be associated with many factors such as
decreased with further increases in S/L ratio. This can be temperature, solution concentration, and the presence of some
justified by the fact that high S/L ratio leads to a starvation of ions in the environment. It is reported that depending on
reagent. For example, it was found that with an S/L ratio of solution concentration and temperature, a large number of iron

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 469


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
minerals in aqueous H2SO4 solutions could precipitate, such as lower leaching of aluminium may be due the presence of an
hydrous ferric oxides (Fe2O3 nH2O) and hydronium jarosite unfavourable structure of aluminium oxides, resulting from the
[H3OFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] [31,38]. This point is further confirmed combustion of coal at high temperatures. Low silicon leaching
by the results from XRD analysis of the treated CFA (Fig. 12). is common in an acidic environment and may be due to the
After 3 hours, the self - inhibition effect of iron to the mass mineral structure of CFA which favours an alkaline solution to
transfer is influenced by the dissolution of other ions from the leach silicon [39].
solid site. The extraction efficiency of iron then increased. The

100

90

80

70
Recovery (%)

60 Fe
Al
50
Si
40 Mg
Ca
30

20

10

0
0 50 100 150 200

Temperature (oC)

Fig. 8: Effect of temperature on the leaching of elements from CFA sample


(particle size: −49 µm, 1.5 M H2SO4, 300 rpm, S/L= 0.33, 1 hour).

100 Fe
Al
Si
80 Mg
Ca
Recovery (%)

60

40

20

0
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
S/L

Fig. 9: Effect of S/L ratio on the leaching of elements from CFA sample
(particle size: −49 µm, 1.5 M H2SO4, 150oC, 300 rpm, 1 hour).

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 470


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

Fig. 10: Effect of time on optimal experimental conditions


(particle size: −49 µm, 1.5 M H2SO4, 150 °C, S/L= 0.20, 300 rpm)

F. Characteristics of the synthesized coagulant solution 47 µm and 49 µm were determined for the treated and raw
The complex coagulant produced from the leaching of CFA samples, respectively.
CFA was a dark green colour liquid. Chemical properties of
the coagulant (synthesized under optimal experimental b) XRD and XRF analyses
conditions at 150 °C for 6 hours) are reported in Table 2. It is observed from the XRD pattern in Fig. 12 that the
Moreover, in a study by [27], the synthesized CFA-based characteristics of the mineral matter in the raw CFA sample
complex coagulant was found to be effective in removing were revealed in the treated CFA. However, throughout
impurities from acid mine drainage. reaction with varying times secondary mineral phases such as
jarosite (2Fe3(OH)6(SO4)2), and gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O) were
Properties of the synthesized complex coagulant at formed. It is established that the formation of jarosite is based
150 °C for 6 h on the presence of iron in sulphate medium and the tendency
pH 0.68–0.75 (< 4) of iron sulphate to hydrolyze at pH less than 3 and at
temperatures between 20 and 200 °C [41,42]. Therefore, in
Colour dark green
H2SO4 environment containing CFA, jarosite precipitate can
Fe 21731.89 mg/L be formed according to reaction in (9) [41,42]. The XRD
Al 603.18 mg/L results of the treated CFA are in agreement with the results in
Si 96.00 mg/L Fig. 10. Furthermore, the formation of gypsum is based on the
Mg 1366.70 mg/L presence of calcium in H2SO4 aqueous solution in which CaO
(in CFA) tends to dissolve in water to produce Ca(OH)2 which
Ca mg/L will react with H2SO4 as per (10) [43].
Table 2: Chemical composition of the synthesized coagulant.
3Fe2(SO4)3 + X2SO4 + 12H2O→2Fe3X(OH)6(SO4)2 +
G. Analysis of the treated coal fly ash 6H2SO4 (9)
Treated CFA samples from the optimal experimental Where X is the hydronium ion.
conditions were analysed by PSD, XRD, XRF, FTIR and SEM
in order to compare them with the raw CFA and measure the Ca(OH)2 + 2H+ + SO42— + 2H2O → CaSO4.2H2O + 2H+ +
impact of H2SO4 leaching. 2OH— (10)
a) PSD analysis Table 3 shows that there is not much change in the XRF
Comparison of the PSD results in Figs. 11 and 1 results of the raw and the treated CFA samples. These results
showed that changes in particle size occurred during the are consistent with XRD results (in Fig. 12).
dissolution process as average particle sizes at 80% weight of

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 471


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

Fig. 11: PSD of the treated CFA with H2SO4 under optimal experimental conditions at different leaching stages: (a) 1 hour
leaching, (b) 3 hours leaching, and (c) 6 hours leaching.

Content (wt%)
Chemical
composition Treated CFA
Raw CFA
1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 8h
Al2O3 32.15 28.20 26.50 24.10 25.20 25.20 25.60 25.96
Fe2O3 4.16 2.34 2.60 3.26 2.14 2.36 2.10 2.19
SiO2 49.92 49.50 49.40 49.30 49.26 49.10 49.50 49.22
CaO 6.25 5.59 5.03 5.18 5.95 6.17 5.60 4.81
TiO2 2.15 2.13 2.15 2.15 2.14 2.14 2.15 2.15
MgO 1.40 0.46 0.56 0.57 0.45 0.46 0.45 0.42
K2O 1.00 1.03 1.14 1.11 1.05 1.07 1.05 1.09
P2O5 1.04 0.16 0.18 0.21 0.17 0.19 0.17 0.19
Table 3: Chemical composition of the raw and treated CFA samples.
Only important elements from important phases are presented

c) FTIR analysis

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 472


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
From the FTIR spectrum in Fig. 13, peaks in the The SEM images of the untreated and treated samples in Fig.
wavenumber ranges from 950–1168 cm-1 and 550–920 cm-1 14 indicate the marked impact of the H2SO4 solution. The
originated from quartz and mullite are practically unchanged surface morphology of the untreated CFA particles (image a)
after leaching, so that the identifiable chemical bonds looks relatively smooth. The morphologies of the treated CFA
remained practically unchanged. The same mineral phases are in images (b), (c) and (d) are almost completely uniform
found in both the raw and treated CFA samples. This fact was compare to the agglomerations of particles in the raw (image
previously established by results from XRD and XRF analyses a). Images (b), (c) and (d) reveal that a porous structure was
(Fig. 12 and Table 3). Furthermore, the raw CFA shows strong formed after leaching. In addition, the dissolution of H2SO4
absorption band at 2359 cm-1 for P=O bond. This suggests that produces a stem-like structure which indicates the formation of
reaction occurred during the leaching process. new phases. This fact is earlier established by results from
XRD analysis (in Fig.12).
d) SEM analysis

M : mullite
Q
J : jarosite
G Q : quartz
H H H
M Q J 8 hours G
M M M
Q Q
: gypsum
H : hematite
6 hours
5 hours
Intensity (cps)

4 hours

3 hours

2 hours

1 hour
Q
M Q M H H Q H
M M M MM Q Q Raw coal fly ash

10 20 30 40 50 60
2 theta (deg)

Figure 12: Comparison of XRD pattern of the raw to the treated CFA with H2SO4 leaching
under optimal experimental conditions in different times.

Si-O
6 hours
or
Si-O
Al-O
5 hours
Transmittance (%)

4 hours

3 hours

2 hours

1 hour

Raw coal fly ash


Si-O Si-O
- or
PO4
Al-O

4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500


-1
Wavenumber (cm )

Fig. 13: Comparison of FTIR spectrum of the raw to the treated CFA by H2SO4
leaching under optimal experimental conditions in different times.

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 473


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165

Fig. 14: SEM micrographs of CFA particles at different leaching stages. (a) raw coal fly ash; (b) coal fly ash after 1 hour leaching
(c) coal fly ash after 3 hours leaching, and (d) coal fly ash after 6 hours leaching.

IV. CONCLUSION REFERENCES

The pressure leaching process of complex coagulant [1.] Apua, M.C., Simate, G.S. Characterization of coal fly ash
synthesis from CFA was studied. Leaching time, H2SO4 for the production of coagulant for usage in wastewater
concentration, S/L ratio and temperature play an important treatment. MS&T, Curran Associates, New York. 2018,
role in the characteristics of the composite coagulant. Iron, 1512–1521.
aluminium, silicon, magnesium and calcium can be extracted [2.] Ahmaruzzaman, M. A review on the utilization of fly
from CFA using H2SO4 solution. Optimal process conditions ash. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 327–363.
are pH 0.3–3.9, S/L = 0.20, 1.5 M H2SO4 concentration, [3.] Blissett, R.S., Rowson, N.A. A review of the multi-
temperature = 150 °C, and time = 6 h with a stirring speed of component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel. 2012, 97, 1–
300 rpm using −49 µm particle size. Aluminium, calcium and 23.
silicon dissolve poorly from CFA. This may be attributed to [4.] Barbosa, V.F.F., MacKenzie, K.J.D. Thermal behaviour
the presence of an unfavourable structure of oxides of of inorganic geopolymers and composites derived from
aluminium, calcium and silicon, resulting from the combustion sodium polysialate. Mater. Res. Bull. 2003, 38, 319–331.
of coal at high temperatures. The dissolutions of iron and [5.] Panias, D., Giannopoulou, I.P., Perraki, T. Effect of
magnesium increase with increasing H2SO4 concentration, synthesis parameters on the mechanical properties of fly
temperature, S/L ratio, and dissolution time. The composite ash-based geopolymers. Colloids and Surfaces A:
coagulant containing polymeric aluminium sulphate, Physicochem. Eng. Aspects. 2007, 301, 246–254.
polymeric ferric sulphate, polymeric calcium sulphate, [6.] Querol, X., Moreno, N., Umana, J.C., Alastuey, A.,
polymeric silicon sulphate, and polymeric magnesium sulphate Hernandez, E., Lopez-Soler, A., Plana, F. Synthesis of
has been successfully produced by the reaction of CFA with zeolites from coal fly ash: an overview. Int. J. Coal Geol.
H2SO4. The dissolution process produced a 57.90% iron, 2002, 50, 413–423.
33.86% aluminium, 11.12% silicon, 73.21% magnesium, and [7.] Rafieizonooz, M., Mirza, J., Salim, M.R., Hussin, M.W.
25.43% calcium coagulant that can be used in wastewater and Khankhaje, E. Investigation of coal bottom ash and
treatment. The dissolution process involves change in the fly ash in concrete as replacement for sand and cement.
particle size distribution of the CFA residues. The initial Constr Build Mater. 2016, 116, 15–24.
average diameter of 49 µm was reduced to 47 µm during the [8.] Asl, S.M.H., Javadian, H., Khavarpour, M., Belviso, C.,
whole dissolution phase. After the leaching process, mineral Taghavi, M. and Maghsudi, M. Porous adsorbents
phases in the untreated CFA sample as well as new phases derived from coal fly ash as cost-effective and
were identified in the treated CFA. The H2SO4 leaching has environmentally-friendly sources of aluminosilicate for
affected the morphology of CFA particles. Porous and stem- sequestration of aqueous and gaseous pollutants: A
like structures were formed after dissolution. The process of review. J. Clean. Prod., 2019, 208, 1131–1147.
producing such a coagulant can be adopted in wastewater [9.] Ochedi, F.O., Liu, Y. and Hussain, A. A review on coal
treatment plants, thereby reducing the problem of CFA waste fly ash-based adsorbents for mercury and arsenic
and producing a valuable chemical reagent. removal. J. Clean. Prod., 2020, 267, 122143.
[10.] Rubel, A., Andrews, R., Gonzalez, R., Groppo, J., Robl,
V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT T. Adsorption of Hg and NOx on coal by-products. Fuel,
2005, 84, 911–916.
The author would like to thank Mrs Nomsa Baloyi and
[11.] Mishra, M.K., Karanam, U.M.R. Geotechnical
Mr Edward Malenga for their technical help. Gratitude is also
characterisation of fly ash composites for backfilling
extended to the University of Johannesburg Extraction
mine voids. Geotech. Geol. Eng., 2006, 24, 1749–1765.
Metallurgy Laboratory for the generous use of their equipment
[12.] Peng, F., Liang, K.M., Hu, A.M. Nano-crystal glass–
for assistance with PSD, SEM/EDS, XRD, XRF and FTIR.
ceramics obtained from high alumina coal fly ash. Fuel,
2005, 84, 341–346.

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 474


Volume 6, Issue 11, November – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[13.] Erol, M., Kucukbayrak, S., Ersoy-Mericboyu, A. oxidation of arsenopyrite. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1993,
Comparison of the properties of glass, glass–ceramic and 11 (1–3), 57–62.
ceramic materials produced from coal fly ash. J. Hazard. [29.] Stumm, W., Morgan, J.J. Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed.
Mater., 2008, 153, 418–425. John Wiley and Sons, USA, 1996.
[14.] Pandey, V.C., Singh, N. Impact of fly ash incorporation [30.] Langmuir, D. Aqueous environmental geochemistry,
in soil systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2010, 136, 16–27. (No. 551.48 L3.), 1997.
[15.] Manoharan, V., Yunusa, I.A.M., Loganathan, P., Lawrie, [31.] Casas, J.M., Crisóstomo, G., Cifuentes, L. Speciation of
R., Skilbeck, C.G., Burchett, M.D., Murray, B.R., the Fe (II)–Fe (III)–H2SO4–H2O system at 25 and 50 °C.
Eamus, D. Assessments of class F fly ashes for Hydrometallurgy. 2005, 80 (4), 254–264.
amelioration of soil acidity and their influence on growth [32.] Yue, G., Zhao, L., Olvera, O.G., Asselin, E. Speciation of
and uptake of Mo and Se by canola. Fuel, 2010, 89, the H2SO4–Fe2(SO4)3– FeSO4–H2O systemand
3498–3504. development of an expression to predict the redox
[16.] Wang, S. Application of solid ash-based catalysts in potential of the Fe3+/Fe2+ couple up to 150 °C.
heterogeneous catalysis. Environ. Sci. Technol, 2008, 42 Hydrometallurgy. 2014, 147–148, 196–209.
(19), 7055–7063. [33.] Rubisov, D.H. and Papangelakis, V.G. Sulphuric acid
[17.] Na, J.G., Jeong, B.H., Chung, S.H., Kim, S.S. Pyrolysis pressure leaching of laterites—speciation and prediction
of low-density polyethylene using synthetic catalysts of metal solubilities “at temperature”. Hydrometallurgy.
produced from fly ash. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 2000, 58 (1), 13– 26.
2006, 8, 126–132. [34.] Fan, M., Brown, R.C., Wheelock, T.D., Cooper, A.T.,
[18.] Mohan, S., Gandhimathi, R. Removal of heavy metal Nomura, M., Zhuang, Y. Production of a complex
ions from municipal solid waste leachate using coal fly coagulant from fly ash. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 106, 269–
ash as an adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 169, 351– 277.
359. [35.] Li, L., Fan, M., Brown, R.C., Koziel, J.A., Leeuwen, J.
[19.] Itskos, G., Koukouzas, N., Vasilatos, C., Megremi, I., H. Production of a new wastewater treatment coagulant
Moutsatsou, A. Comparative uptake study of toxic from fly ash with concomitant flue gas scrubbing. J.
elements from aqueous media by the different particle Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 1430–1437.
size-fractions of fly ash. J. Hazard. Mater., 2010, 183, [36.] Kelmers, A.D., Egan, B.Z., Seeley, F.G., Campbell, G.D.
787–792. Direct acid dissolution of aluminium and other metals
[20.] Sahoo, P.K., Kim, K., Powell, M.A., Equeenuddin, S.M. from fly ash. The Metallurgical Society of AIME, TMS
Recovery of metals and other beneficial products from paper A. 1981, 81–24.
coal fly ash: A sustainable approach for fly ash [37.] Matjie, R.H., Li, Z., Ward, C.R., French, D. Chemical
management. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol, 2016, 3 (3), 267– composition of glass and crystalline phases in coarse coal
283. gasification ash. Fuel. 2008, 87, 857–859.
[21.] Matjie, R.H., Bunt, J.R., van Heerden, J.H.P. Extraction [38.] Welham, N.J., Malatt, K.A., Vukcevic, S. The effect of
of alumina from coal fly ash generated from a selected solution speciation on iron–sulphur–arsenic–chloride
low rank bituminous South African coal. Miner. Eng., systems at 298 K. Hydrometallurgy. 2000, 57 (3), 209–
2005, 18, 299−310. 223.
[22.] Vadapalli, V.R.K., Klink, M.J., Etchebers, O., Petrik, [39.] Mazzocchitti, G., Giannopoulou, I., Panias, D. Silicon
L.F., Gitari, W., White, R.A., Key, D., Iwuoha, E. and aluminum removal from ilmenite concentrates by
Neutralization of acid mine drainage using fly ash, and alkaline leaching. Hydrometallurgy. 2009, 96 (4), 327–
strength development of the resulting solid residues. S. 332.
Afr. J. Sci., 2008, 104, 317–322. [40.] Babcan, J. Synthesis of jarosite KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6.
[23.] Fan, M., Brown, R.C., Leeuwen, J.H.V., Nomura, M., Geology. Zb. 1971, 22 (2), 299–304.
Zhuang, Y. The kinetics of producing sulfate-based [41.] Roeland, J., Dijkhuis, E. The minimisation of copper
complex coagulant from fly ash. Chem. Eng. Process. losses during iron and aluminium precipitation from zinc
2003, 42, 1019–1025. leach liquors. Technical University of Delft, The
[24.] Nabi, B.G.R., Torabian, A., Ehsani, H., Razmkhah, N. Netherlands, 2009.
Evaluation of industrial dyeing wastewater treatment [42.] Malenga, E.N., Mulaba-Bafubiandi, A.F., Nheta, W.
with coagulants and polyelectrolyte as a coagulant aid. Alkaline leaching of nickel bearing ammonium jarosite
Iran. j. environ. health sci. eng. 2007, 4 (1), 29–36. precipitate using KOH, NaOH and NH4OH in the
[25.] Semerjian, L., Ayoub, G.M. High-pH–magnesium presence of EDTA and Na2S. Hydrometallurgy. 2015,
coagulation–flocculation in wastewater treatment. Adv. 155, 69–78.
environ. Res. 2003, 7 (2), 389–403. [43.] Bellmann, F., Moser, B., Stark, J. Influence of sulfate
[26.] Teringo, T. Magnesium hydroxide reduces solution concentration on the formation of gypsum in
sludge/improves filtering. Pollut. Eng. 1987, 19, 78–83. sulfate resistance test specimen. Cem Concr Res. 2006,
[27.] Apua, M.C. Total dissolved solids and turbidity removal 36, 358–363.
from acid mine drainage using a coal fly ash-based
complex coagulant, Int. j. adv. sci. eng. technol. 2020, 8
(1), 51–55.
[28.] Barrett, J., Ewart, D.K., Hughes, M.N., Poole, R.K.
Chemical and biological pathways in the bacterial

IJISRT21NOV075 www.ijisrt.com 475

You might also like