0% found this document useful (0 votes)
252 views1 page

Fs 2 Scoring Rubrics

This document contains an evaluation rubric for a performance task assessing a field study on effective teachers. The rubric evaluates students on participation in learning activities, analysis of questions, reflection on lessons, use of learning artifacts, and timely submission. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 4 in various criteria, such as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, and needs improvement. Overall scores are then transmuted to a letter grade on a scale of 1.0 to 5.0.

Uploaded by

Llianne Abines
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
252 views1 page

Fs 2 Scoring Rubrics

This document contains an evaluation rubric for a performance task assessing a field study on effective teachers. The rubric evaluates students on participation in learning activities, analysis of questions, reflection on lessons, use of learning artifacts, and timely submission. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 4 in various criteria, such as excellent, very satisfactory, satisfactory, and needs improvement. Overall scores are then transmuted to a letter grade on a scale of 1.0 to 5.0.

Uploaded by

Llianne Abines
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

EVALUATE Performance Task

Evaluate Your Work Task Field Study 2, Learning Episode 1 – The Teacher We Remember!
Learning Outcome: * Cite the personal qualities of an effective teacher
*State the professional competencies expected of a teacher.

Name of FS Student____________________________ Date Submitted:_______________


Year and Section_______________________________Course:______________________

Learning Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Needs Improvement


Episode 3 1
4 2

Accomplished All participation One (1) to two (2) Three (3) participation Four (4) or more
Participation activities/questions/tasks participation activities/tasks not participation
Activities completely activities/questions/tasks answered/accomplish activities/questions/tasks
answered/accomplished not not
answered/accomplished answered/accomplished
Analysis All questions were All questions were Questions were not Four(4) or more
answered completely; answered completely; answered completely; observation questions
answers are with depth answers are clearly answers are not clearly were not answered;
and are thoroughly connected to theories; connected to theories; answers not connected to
grounded on theories; grammar and spelling are one (1) to three (3) theories; more than four
grammar and spelling are free from errors. grammatical errors (4) grammatical errors
free from error.
Reflection Profound and clear; Clear but lacks depth; Not so clear and Unclear and shallow; rarely
supported by what were supported by what were shallow; somewhat supported by what were
observed and analyzed observed and analyzed supported by what were observed and analyzed
observed and analyzed
Learning Portfolio is reflected on in Portfolio is reflected on in Portfolio is not reflected Portfolio is not reflected on
Artifacts the context of the learning the context of the learning on in the context of the in the context of the
outcomes; Complete, well- outcomes; Complete, well- learning outcomes; learning outcomes;
organized, highly relevant organized, very relevant to Complete, not- Complete, not organized,
to the learning outcome the learning outcome organized, highly not relevant
relevant to the learning
outcome
Submission Submitted before the Submitted on the Submitted a day after Submitted two(2) or more
deadline deadline the deadline days after the deadline
COMMENT/S Over-all Score Rating:
(Based on Transmutation)

TRANSMUTATION OF SCORE TO GRADE/RATING


SCORE 20 19-18 17 16 15 14 13-12 11 10 9-8 7-below
Grade 1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.0- 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.5 5.00
99 96 93 90 87 84 81 78 75 72 72-Below

MICHAEL MARK M. CALUSCUSIN Date:


FS Facilitator

You might also like