Scribd
Upload
141 views1 page

Pre-Trial Guide Criminal Case - Btsfa

This document is a pre-trial guide from a municipal circuit trial court in Davao del Norte, Philippines for criminal case numbers 12,572-21, 12,573-21, and 12,574-21 against Vivian Lorona and others for altering boundaries, malicious mischief, and unjust vexation. It contains an offer for stipulation on 5 points relating to the accused's ownership and possession of the disputed land for over 30 years that they can either stipulate to or deny.

Uploaded by

lyndon melvi sumiog
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
141 views1 page

Pre-Trial Guide Criminal Case - Btsfa

This document is a pre-trial guide from a municipal circuit trial court in Davao del Norte, Philippines for criminal case numbers 12,572-21, 12,573-21, and 12,574-21 against Vivian Lorona and others for altering boundaries, malicious mischief, and unjust vexation. It contains an offer for stipulation on 5 points relating to the accused's ownership and possession of the disputed land for over 30 years that they can either stipulate to or deny.

Uploaded by

lyndon melvi sumiog
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Republic of the Philippines

11TH Judicial Region


1st MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT
Carmen- Sto. Tomas- Braulio E. Dujali
Davao del Norte

THE PEOPLE OF THE CRIMINAL CASE NO. 12, 572-21,


PHILIPPINES 12, 573-21and 12, 574-21
Plaintiff,

-versus- For: ALTERING BOUNDARIES,


MALICIOUS MISCHIEF,
VIVIAN LORONA, UNJUST VEXATION.
et. al.
Accused,

x-------------------------------x

PRE-TRIAL GUIDE FOR THE ACCUSED

OFFER FOR STIPULATION STIPULAT DENIE


ED D
1. Accused are the owners of the disputed land.
2. Accused are in actual, open, continuous
possession in the concept on an owner on the
disputed land for more than thirty (30) years.
3. Accused or their predecessors-in-interest
occupied the land since 1986.
4. Accused and their predecessors-in-interest
cultivated the subject land and transformed the
same from a second-growth forest to a rice field.
5. Accused was not

Counter Affidavit Page 1 of 1

You might also like