Investigation Report Sample
Investigation Report Sample
FROM : Officer-In-Charge
I. AUTHORITY:
IV. DISCUSSION:
10. In this instant case under investigation and both parties have a respective
allegation with the incident. In the statement of V1 driver he only saw a yellow
Mercedez-Benz hit and damages his vehicle while on park at the road side
thereafter fled toward 15 St without identifying the LTO plate no and the model of
the suspected vehicle, upon chased he chance upon V2 Upon confrontation, the
driver of V2 denied the allegation of V1 which caused their heated arguments
Responding traffic investigator has brought them to this office, ocular inspection
was made and recovered particles left by the other vehicle attach to the bumper
as cause by strong impact of damages. In the statement of V2 driver, he was
surprised when he was being flagged down by V1 driver while he was travelling
to his work place at Café de Cafitana, situated at 41" St. Barangay Nazareth, this
city. Both drivers were advised to undergo medical examination due to the
suspicious smelling of alcoholic breath but V2 driver refused while V1 driver
voluntarily submitted himself with hospital no 21134567.
In the ocular inspection made by the traffic investigator to the vehicles
presented, damages were situated at the front right portion (signal light broken)
vertically measured 1,15 meters in height from the concrete surface, crack signal light
holder, misaligned right side bumper, scratches and dents on the bumper while V2 has
no current damage, only visible scratches and dents at the front left side bumper
Damages were photograph
11. In the follow-up investigation, the duty traffic investigator conducted ocular
investigation at the place of incident disclosed that the place is narrow and near a
blind curve and upon walk thru, some debris were recovered near the side of the
road Further the place and the recovered debris was photograph
V. CONCLUSION:
12. After a careful perusal surrounding this particular incident, a fact of comparison
related with the damage incurred by V1 were not appropriate/matched as to the
vertical height, structure of the vehicle and to the damages of 92. In the
disposition of the traffic investigator related with the drivers suspected smelling
alcoholic breath they submitted both drivers but only V1 driver voluntarily
submitted himself for medical attention while V2 defensively refused the
procedure.
VI. RECOMMENDATION:
Cardo Dalisay
Police Corporal