0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views

MRI of ACL

Uploaded by

Tri Fara Melinia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views

MRI of ACL

Uploaded by

Tri Fara Melinia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

The Knee 14 (2007) 339 – 347

Review
MR imaging of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries
Darren Klass a,⁎, Andoni P. Toms a , Richard Greenwood a , Philip Hopgood b
a
Department of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
b
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom

Received 7 February 2007; received in revised form 21 April 2007; accepted 23 April 2007

Abstract

MRI of the knee has become an indispensable clinical tool in the management of chronic knee conditions. MRI for acute knee injuries is
less well established but is becoming increasingly prevalent. MRI in acute ACL injuries is particularly useful for identifying associated
injuries that will influence the early management of the patient. The aim of this paper is to describe the MRI findings of acute ACL tears,
their commonly associated, and less common but serious associated injuries. Where available, the evidence for the sensitivity and specificity
of these MRI features is presented. The contribution of these MRI findings to the management of the patient is discussed.
© 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: ACL; Anatomy; Associated injury; Direct signs; Indirect signs; MRI; Open MRI; Postero-lateral corner

Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
339
2. MRI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
2.1. MRI hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
2.2. MRI protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
2.3. MR sequences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
2.4. T1 weighted (T1W) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
2.5. T2 weighted (T2W) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
2.6. Proton density (PD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
2.7. T2⁎ gradient echo sequence (T2⁎GRE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
3. The normal ACL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
4. Injured ACL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
4.1. Direct MRI signs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
4.2. Indirect MRI signs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
4.3. Indirect signs include . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
4.4. Partial tears . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344
4.5. Associated injuries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
5. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346

⁎ Corresponding author. Radiology Academy, Cotman Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UB, United Kingdom.
Tel.: +44 1603286140; fax: +44 1603286146.
E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Klass).

0968-0160/$ - see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.knee.2007.04.008
340 D. Klass et al. / The Knee 14 (2007) 339–347

1. Introduction Open MRI was developed in an attempt to eliminate some


of the claustrophobia and anxiety associated with traditional
MRI of the knee has been a clinical tool for twenty years “closed” bore MRI [53]. One of the drawbacks with open
and has been widely available in developed countries for MRI has been many of them have low magnetic field
fifteen years [2,23]. The sensitivity and specificity of knee strengths (0.2 T), and therefore the problems with ultra-low-
MRI for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is high, with field MRI remain, despite increased patient tolerance.
sensitivities and specificities of 90–95% and 95–100% Manufacturers today have largely overcome this problem,
respectively quoted in the literature [2,5,9,14]. The role that by designing “large bore” scanners (Magnetom Espree®,
MRI plays in the diagnostic algorithm varies from clinician Siemens Medical, Munich, Germany). While maintaining
to clinician, often owing to the accuracy of clinical exam- the high field strength (1.5 T), more room is now available
ination [16,41,43,56,57]. In the UK it is not common around the patient's head. The “open” bore MRI scanner
practice to perform MRI in suspected acute ACL tears but combines an increased inner bore diameter (70 cm), and a
anecdotally this practice is increasing in prevalence. In shorter bore length (125 cm), thus allowing the patient's
patients with major knee trauma, in whom the knee is very head to remain out of the bore during many examinations.
swollen and the plain radiographs are normal, MRI may This development, combined with an ultra-high field magnet
significantly contribute to the management of the patient overcomes common imaging problems associated with MRI,
[9,26]. Although, for most patients, an ACL tear does not such as patient anxiety and claustrophobia.
need to be reconstructed in the acute setting [9], associated
injuries such as trabecular fractures, peripheral meniscal or 2.2. MRI protocol
collateral ligament tears, or capsular ruptures may alter the
immediate management [2,5,24,29,34,50]. Most authorities consider that at least one sequence in
The aim of this paper is to describe the MRI findings of each principle orthogonal plane is mandatory [2,5,22,31].
acute ACL tears. Some associated injuries which have not Two sequences are typically prescribed in the sagittal plane
been previously illustrated, that may be useful in the early and extra sequences are commonly employed if there is a
management of acute ACL tears are also presented. Al- history of previous surgery. Each plane is optimal for
though the role of MRI in managing acute ACL tears is still evaluation of separate structures, and so the planes should be
the subject of debate, this paper presents the potential use orientated to the joint rather than the patient.
and limitations of MRI in this role. Images of the knee are typically obtained in the axial,
oblique sagittal and oblique coronal planes [13,26,42]. Axial
2. MRI images extend from the quadriceps tendon, proximal to the
epicondyles to the patella tendon tibial insertion [26]. Oblique
2.1. MRI hardware coronals are prescribed from the axial images, extending from
the patella anteriorly to the posterior musculature. They are re-
Most authorities consider that optimal knee MRI requires a orientated parallel to a line drawn through the epicondyles. The
superconducting magnet of 1 to 1.5 T field strength and a oblique sagittals are prescribed from the axial images and
dedicated knee coil [53], but things are changing fast on two orientated at 90° to the coronal images, and extend from the
fronts. The standard MR platform for many new installations medial to lateral subcutaneous tissues, just beyond the col-
has a 3 T field strength which has superior signal to noise ratios lateral ligaments [26].
when compared with 1 or 1.5 T. This allows either reduced
examination times or improvements in spatial resolution [54]. 2.3. MR sequences
There are however, safety concerns for patients, higher field
strengths cause increased energy deposition in tissue. This Sequences employed to image the knee vary from insti-
may be four fold higher at 3 T than at 1.5 T, which is being tution to institution depending on the hardware, strength of the
evaluated. particular imaging system and experience of the radiologist.
Despite these caveats there is emerging evidence that 3 T In general, fast spin-echo (FSE)[6,17], proton density and
MRI may produce superior soft tissue contrast in the muscu- FSE fat suppressed T2-weighted images are used to diagnose
loskeletal system [54]. internal derangements of the knee. Images without fat sup-
Conversely there is a drive to develop cheaper MRI ma- pression are used to delineate anatomy [26]. Most centres
chines with smaller footprints that do not require expensive acquire thin 3–4 mm slices in each plane [2,22,24,28,29].
builds to accommodate them. Extremity magnets at 0.5 to 1 T The following is an outline of the principle's uses of each of
field strengths are now widely available and are particularly the commonly used sequences.
suited to imaging peripheral joints such as the knee [2,21]. A
recent study comparing a 0.2 T to a 1.5 T MR scanner showed 2.4. T1 weighted (T1W)
no significant difference in diagnostic performance, the only
drawback was an increased scan time for the 0.2 T machine by Fat is high signal and fluid is low signal on this sequence
15 min [4]. which is often considered to be the optimal sequence for soft
D. Klass et al. / The Knee 14 (2007) 339–347 341

contusions and fractures can also be seen using a fat sup-


pression sequence [2,5,22].

2.6. Proton density (PD)

The signal generated by PD sequences depends princi-


pally on the number of protons within tissue. They are
sensitive for tears and degenerative changes in the menisci
[26] and therefore are commonly used in conjunction with
T2W fast spin-echo and fat suppressed sequences for the
assessment of the menisci [22,26].

2.7. T2⁎ gradient echo sequence (T2⁎GRE)

This sequence is also considered to be very sensitive for


Fig. 1. Sagittal fat saturated proton density MR image through the lateral aspect meniscocapsular disease and therefore is usually employed
of the intercondylar notch demonstrating a normal low signal (black) antero-
to examine the meniscus at the periphery [22]. The use of
lateral ACL bundle which parallels Blumensaat's line (arrowhead). At the end
the bundles split and fan out in to the tibial insertion (arrow). T2⁎ GRE with 3D acquisition has been evaluated for
diagnosing ACL tears [5]. This was found to be slightly less
accurate than routine spin echo sequences [5].
tissue anatomy [26]. Fat provides a contrasting high signal
background to the low signal ligaments and tendons and 3. The normal ACL
intermediate signal muscles. It is essential in acute major
knee trauma as it is the most sensitive sequence for Starting with the sagittal sequences, the normal ACL
demonstrating trabecular fractures [5], which appear as low appears as a band comprising low signal lines which parallel
signal linear structures against the high signal of marrow fat. the anterior wall of the intercondylar notch (Blumensaat's
line); inclined to about 55° from the tibial plateau [2,5], usually
2.5. T2 weighted (T2W) over two consecutive slices in the mid-sagittal plane [2]. When
these appearances are seen an intact ACL can be inferred. As
T2W sequences are sensitive to fluid which is high signal. the ACL fans out to its tibial attachment, individual fibre
Fat is also high signal on T2W and therefore some form of fat bundles of the ligament can be seen, with alternating increased
signal suppression (spectral fat saturation or STIR) is and decreased signal intensities [2,5] (Fig. 1).
required to demonstrate bone marrow oedema and oedema When the appearances are abnormal this can be for two
in subcutaneous fat [22]. T2W images, including fat reasons; the plane of the sagittal slice is not parallel with the
suppressed sequences highlight ligamentous oedema and ACL or the ACL is abnormal. The coronal (Fig. 2) and axial
haemorrhage in collateral ligaments in the coronal plane, and
cruciate ligaments in the sagittal plane. Trabecular bone

Fig. 3. Axial fat saturated T2 weighted MRI demonstrating the antero-


medial (grey arrow) and postero-lateral (arrowhead) low signal bundles of
Fig. 2. Coronal PD/T2 weighted image demonstrating the two bundles of the the ACL just distal to their attachment to the lateral femoral condyle. The
ACL which can be identified as separate medial and lateral low signal lines femoral insertion of the PCL is seen in the medial aspect of the intercondylar
(arrow). notch (white arrow).
342 D. Klass et al. / The Knee 14 (2007) 339–347

(Fig. 3) images are then examined. In each of these planes


the antero-medial (AMB) and postero-lateral bundles (PLB)
can be identified separately as low signal linear structures
which progress from postero-superior to antero-inferior in
equally spaced increments from femoral to tibial insertion.
Slightly inhomogeneous signal intensity may be seen in the
normal ligament [2], this may be due to the altering tensions
of the cruciate ligaments through the arc of motion [49]. The
change in water content is thought to be responsible for this
[49]. MR examinations of the knee have traditionally been
performed with the knee in extension [11,22,26,27], but
recent studies looking at the knee MRI in slight flexion have
shown this to be superior in delineating the entire length of
ACL [11,27]. If the knee is flexed the signal intensity of the
ACL decreases [2,22,49]. The normal PLB may be of
intermediate signal intensity on T1W images [22] (This is
thought to be due to the differing tensions placed on the
bundle fibres of the ligament.). At the femoral insertion the
two bundles are closely approximated and at the tibial
insertion they flare out [2,5,22].

4. Injured ACL

4.1. Direct MRI signs

The appearances of the acutely torn ACL are variable but


there are a number of recognised patterns.
Common findings include:

1. A well-defined mass filling the intercondylar notch


replacing the well-defined band-like structure of the
ACL [2,5,15,22,25,26,28]. The mass comprises high Fig. 5. A. Sagittal T2W Fat Saturated Image (FSI) showing an anterior
signal, indicating fluid and haemorrhage which may be translocation of the femur on the tibia. The “Anterior Draw Sign” is present
confined to an intact synovial sheath [18,19,29]. when the posterior tibial border is more than 5 mm anterior to a
However all fibrillar structures are absent [29]. The perpendicular dropped from the posterior aspect of the femoral condyle.
B. A line drawn at an angle of 45° to the posterior superior end of Blumensaat's
margins of the lesion are typically convex and ill- line does not intersect with the flat portion of the tibial plateau indicating
defined (Fig. 4). anterior tibial translation.

2. The ACL may be poorly demonstrated or not demon-


strated at all on sagittal images [22,29] (Fig. 5B).
3. The ACL may be discontinuous [22]. Damage to the
ligament seen on one slice may indicate a possible complete
tear, partial tear or intrasubstance tear. This seen alone is not
sufficient to diagnose an ACL tear. Review of the images in
other planes is required to confirm the diagnosis.
4. The linear low signal of the AMB and PLB may still be
present, apparently in continuity from the tibial to femoral
insertion. ACL disruption on axial and sagittal images, and
failure of the ACL fascicles to parallel Blumensaat's line
are a primary and accurate sign of a ligament tear. Increased
signal intensity on T2, or T2⁎ GRE sequences may also be
seen at the femoral attachment of the ACL [22,28–30].
Fig. 4. Sagittal gradient echo MRI demonstrating high signal replacement of
the ACL (arrow) in a complete tear. The proximal ACL remnant can be seen There are less common patterns of ACL tears. The ACL
falling away from Blumensaat's line (arrowhead). may avulse cleanly from bone with relatively little disruption
D. Klass et al. / The Knee 14 (2007) 339–347 343

are normal synovial recesses around the ACL and PCL in


which the synovial fluid must be distinguished from free
fluid of recent trauma.

4.2. Indirect MRI signs

Indirect signs of an ACL tear are those appearances which


result as a consequence of the ACL tear alone and not
features of associated injuries. These findings can be helpful
in diagnosing an ACL tear but cannot be used in isolation.
They cannot be used to diagnose a tear in the absence of any
of the direct signs described above [28].

4.3. Indirect signs include

Fig. 6. Sagittal T2 MRI through the patella ligament. Anterior translation of 1. Anterior subluxation of the tibia relative to the femur,
the tibia has caused buckling of the patella tendon (arrowheads). The high
“The Draw Sign”.
signal foci within the tendon occur because the collagen fibres are aligned at
55° to the axis of the magnetic field. This is called the “magic angle” effect This can be demonstrated on mid-condylar sagittal
and should not be confused with a tendon tear. images. The femoral condyles translate posteriorly
relative to the posterior margin of the tibia, by more
to the main body of ACL fibres. These injuries are difficult to than 7 mm [2,22,29,30]. In a normal knee the line is
appreciate on the sagittal sequences [31]. Occasionally the drawn from the posterior cortex of the medial or lateral
proximally torn ACL may adhere to the PCL thereby femoral condyle to pass within 5–7 mm of the posterior
maintaining its gross alignment on the sagittal sequences. In cortex of the tibia [29,30,32] (Fig. 5A). An “uncovered
both these scenarios the diagnosis may be made in the axial lateral meniscus” sign has also been described as a sign of
or coronal planes [31]. increased anterior tibial shift. Relative posterior displace-
A disrupted ACL with a small oedematous focus is also a ment of the lateral meniscus, compared to the tibia,
common presentation of an acute ACL tear. The axial plane regarded as positive if the line intersects the meniscus but
is used to identify sites of tears corresponding to the AMB not the tibia [28].
and PLB. Fluid signal in the proximal ACL, at the insertion 2. Buckled PCL
into the lateral femoral condyle is a common finding in ACL A buckled PCL is defined as when any segment of the
ruptures in skiers [22]. PCL is concave posteriorly [2,28–30].
The axial and coronal planes are especially useful for Both the femoral and tibial insertions of the PCL are often
differentiating femoral avulsion of the ACL and lesser degrees visualised on a single sagittal image. The curve of the
of sprain injury from the more typical midsubstance rupture. PCL can be quantified by constructing a line from the
The torn ligament is often obviously interrupted and anteriormost insertions of the ligament on the tibia and
associated with fluid and haemorrhage [2,8,22,29,30]. There

Fig. 8. Sagittal fat saturated PD weighted MRI demonstrating high signal


Fig. 7. Axial fat saturated T2W MRI demonstrating the presence of only a within the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (arrow). The high signal
single ACL bundle (arrow) in a partial thickness ACL tear. Compare this extends to the superior and inferior articular surfaces indicating a vertical
image with Fig. 3. tear at the junction of the middle and outer thirds.
344 D. Klass et al. / The Knee 14 (2007) 339–347

one paper in the literature, however this sign has a low


sensitivity of 54% as quoted by the authors [29].
5. The posterior femoral line
When positive a line drawn at 45° from the postero-
superior corner of Blumensaat's line fails to intersect the
flat portion of the proximal tibial surface. Or failure of the
line to intersect a point within 5 mm of its posterior
margin [22,29] (Fig. 5A and B). This sign was found to be
accurate and reliable for the detection of instability
secondary to an ACL tear [29].
6. Buckling of the patella tendon [29,40] (Fig. 6)
Tears of the ACL and subsequent anterior translation of
the tibia decrease the angle of insertion of the patellar
tendon on the tibial tubercle, causing shortening of the
patella–tibial tubercle distance [40]. A relatively fixed
patella with anterior tibial translation may cause buckling
of the patella tendon [40].

4.4. Partial tears

Partial tears of the ACL are notoriously difficult to detect


[20,22,48,51]. Subtle increased signal intensity in the
substance of the ACL is often the only sign [18,20], but
this in isolation may be unreliable [19]. Designation of
specific AMB or PLB tears is often impossible. Although the
bulk of the ligament looks intact, there may be a slight
angulation at the sight of fibre disruption [20,22,47].
The diagnosis of complete or partial tears has an influence
on management [18,19,33,52]. Dowdy et al. [48] concluded
that a positive MRI for an ACL tear combined with a normal
arthroscopy did not necessarily represent a false positive
MRI and that an intrasubstance tear may be present which is
Fig. 9. A. Coronal PD MRI demonstrating a grossly intact but thickened and
ill-defined MCL (arrow) indicating a partial thickness tear. The MCL is
difficult to detect with arthroscopy. Umans et al. [33] con-
surrounded by low signal material (oedema and fibrosis) where high signal cluded that MR alone was inadequate for diagnosis, and re-
fat should be. B. Coronal T1W MRI demonstrating a complete avulsion of commended arthroscopic correlation. The authors did admit
the MCL from the tibial insertion (arrow).

femur, and measuring perpendicularly to the undersurface


of the PCL. These two values are then divided to give a
PCL curvature. [28]. The normal value being less than
0.21 and an abnormal value greater than 0.42 [28].
3. The posterior PCL line
This is the failure of a line drawn along the posterior PCL
on sagittal images to intersect the medullary cavity within
5 mm of the distal femur [28,29,41]. This change in
orientation of the PCL was originally thought to be solely
due to anterior translation, but direct trauma to the ACL is
too, thought to contribute [41]. The ACL and PCL are
functionally related in a complex mechanism; a change in
the PCL orientation may also therefore be due to a change
in the ACL fibre orientation [41].
4. The coronal PCL sign Fig. 10. Coronal PD/T2W MRI demonstrating a complete tear of the fibula
collateral ligament (white arrow) which has been displaced laterally by the
This is present when the whole of the PCL is observed on underlying joint effusion in which lies the popliteus tendon (black arrow). A
a single coronal image [29]. This is a consequence of partial thickness tear of the myotendinous junction of the popliteus tendon
anterior tibial translation, and has only been described in has stretched popliteus allowing for the displacement.
D. Klass et al. / The Knee 14 (2007) 339–347 345

present with some detectable fibrillar pattern but overall


the ACL is thickened and there is often high signal
throughout the ligament. In these cases it is difficult to
determine how much functional ligament remains intact.

4.5. Associated injuries

Injuries that commonly occur in association with ACL


tears include medial and lateral meniscus tears [1,12,25,
44–46,55] (Fig. 8), tears of the MCL [8] (Fig. 9A and B) and
postero-lateral corner structures [7,10,34–37] (Fig. 10).
The MR imaging of these injuries has already been well
described.
There are two associated injuries which have received less
attention in the medical literature. These are capsular rupture
Fig. 11. Axial T2W MR image demonstrating the high signal of synovial and trabecular fractures. Demonstrating them early with MRI
fluid and blood within the knee joint communicating with the subcutaneous
can influence the early management of the ACL injury.
fat through a breach (arrow) in the medial capsule.
Capsular rupture, although uncommon, usually indicates
major knee trauma due to transient dislocation [5,8,22]. This
that the study was limited by its small size and heterogenous
MR imaging technique.
Partial thickness ACL tears may be diagnosed using the
following intrinsic ACL abnormalities seen on MR.

1. Disruption of the ACL fascicles [22]. Disruption of


fascicles is often the only sign of intrasubstance tear. The
diagnosis can be made by identifying discontinuity in
either the AMB or PLB. The axial images are of the most
helpful for this.
2. Focal oedema or focal thickening in the ACL may indicate
a partial tear [29]. This presents as focal high signal on T2W
and low signal T1W images.
3. Diffuse thickening of the ACL because of fascicle dis-
ruption [29] (Fig. 7). The general form of the ACL may be

Fig. 12. Sagittal fat saturated T2W MRI demonstrating high signal in the
bone marrow of the lateral femoral condyle and the postero-lateral tibial Fig. 13. Coronal MRI of the femoral condyles. The two images demonstrate
plateau where is abuts the articular surface. The high signal has an ill-defined the importance of using T1W images in acute trauma. The PD/T2W image
margin typical of oedema. The epicentre of the oedema indicates the site of (A) demonstrates normal bone marrow but the T1W (B) image in the same
impact; the deepened terminal sulcus of the lateral femoral condyle and the position clearly demonstrates the irregular low signal lines of impacted
posterior margin of the tibial plateau. trabecula fractures (arrow).
346 D. Klass et al. / The Knee 14 (2007) 339–347

finding can be overlooked on MRI because haemorrhage and [11] Lee SY, Matsui N, Yoshida K, Doi R, Matsushima S, Wakami T, et al.
soft tissue oedema is often extensive. The diagnosis is made, Magnetic resonance delineation of the anterior cruciate ligament of
the knee flexed knee position within a surface coil. J Clin Imaging
usually on coronal or axial images where intra-articular fluid 2005;29:117–22.
(synovial fluid and blood) can be demonstrated in direct [12] Kobayashi K, Nakayama Y, Shirai Y, Narita T, Mori A. Menisceal tears
continuity with subcutaneous fluid [22] (Fig. 11). after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Nippon Med Sch
Bone contusions are diagnosed when bone marrow oedema 2001;68(1):24–8.
[13] Katahira K, Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Otsuka N, Koga Y,
is demonstrated abutting an articular surface in the presence of
Fukumoto T, et al. MR imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament:
trauma [3,10,38,39]. Bone marrow oedema is characterised by value of thin slice direct oblique coronal technique. Radiat Med
homogeneous low signal on T1W and high signal on T2 fat sat 2001;19(1):1–7.
sequences which has an ill-defined margin fading to normal [14] Fayad LM, Parellada JA, Parker L, Schweitzer ME. MR imaging of
marrow signal [38] (Fig. 12). Fractures, which may be occult anterior cruciate ligament tears: is there a gender gap? Skeletal Radiol
on plain radiographs, are best demonstrated on sagittal and 2003;32:639–46.
[15] Vahey TN, Broome DR, Kayes KJ, Shelbourne KD. Acute and chronic
coronal planes [5], but are only reliably demonstrated on T1W tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: differential features at MR
sequences [5] (Fig. 13A and B). T1W images are not always imaging. Radiology 1991;181:251–3.
used for routine knee imaging but are essential in imaging the [16] Rose NE, Gold SM. A comparison of accuracy between clinical exam-
acute ACL. Trabecular fractures manifest as low signal lines ination and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal
when trabecular impaction has occurred. and anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthroscopy Aug 1996;12
(4):398–405.
[17] Ha TPT, Li KCP, Beaulieu CF, Bergman G, Ch'en IY, Eller DJ, et al.
5. Conclusion Anterior cruciate ligament injury: fast spin-echo MR imaging with
arthroscopic correlation 217 examinations. Am J Roentgenol May
This review has shown the potential findings on MRI scan 1998;170:1215–9.
in acute ACL injuries. Most orthopaedic surgeons do not need [18] Roychowdhury S, Fitzgerald SW, Sonin AH, Peduto AJ, Miller FH,
Hoff FL. Using MR imaging to diagnose partial tears of the anterior
to obtain an MRI scan to define the management of a patient cruciate ligament: value of axial images. Am J Roentgenol June
with an ACL rupture. However a scan may be obtained where 1997;168:1487–91.
there is diagnostic uncertainty, and this review should help [19] Lawrence JAL, Ostlere SJ, Dodd CAF. MRI diagnosis of partial tears
knee surgeons understand the advantages and pitfalls of of the anterior cruciate ligament. Injury 1996;27(3):153–5.
modern scanners and imaging techniques. It should be realised [20] Chen W-T, Shih TT-F, Tu H-Y, Chen R-C, Shau W-Y. Partial and
complete tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: direct and indirect MR
that significant advances are being made, and that there may be signs. Acta Radiol 2002;43:511–6.
an increasing use of MRI in the management of the acutely [21] Ekelund L, Björnebrink J, Elmqvist L-G. Ultra-low field magnetic
injured knee which will include rupture of the ACL. resonance imaging of acute cruciate ligament tears. Magn Reson
Imaging 1991;9:179–85.
References [22] Stoller DW, Dilworth Cannon Jr W, Anderson LJ. The knee. In: Stoller
DW, et al, editor. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and
[1] Jee W-H, McCauley TR, Kim J-M. Magnetic resonance diagnosis of Sports Injuries. 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 203.
meniscal tears in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. [23] Lee JK, Yao L, Phleps CT, Wirth CR, Czajka J, Lozman J. Anterior
J Comput Assist Tomogr May/June 2004;28(3):402–6. cruciate ligament tears: MR imaging compared with arthroscopy and
[2] Moore S. Imaging the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop Clin North clinical tests. Radiology 1988;166:861–4.
Am 2002;33:663–74. [24] McCauley TR, Moses M, Kier R, Lynch JK, Barton JW, Jokl P. MR
[3] Terzidis IP, Christodoulou AG, Ploumis AL, Metsovitis SR, Koimtzis diagnosis of tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: importance of
M, Givissis P. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:592–6. ancillary findings. Am J Radiol 1994;162:115–9.
[4] Cotton A, Delfaut E, Demondion X, Lapégue F, Boukhelifa M, Boutry [25] Mink JH, Levy T, Crues III JV. Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament and
N, et al. MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5T: correlation with menisci of the knee: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1988;167:
surgery. Am J Roentgenol April 2000;172:1093–7. 769–74.
[5] Vahey TN, Meyer SF, Shelbourne KD, Klootwyk TE. MR imaging of [26] Fritz RC. MR Imaging of meniscal and cruciate ligament injuries.
anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am May 2003;11:283–93.
Aug 1994;2(3):365–80. [27] Niitsu M, Ikeda K, Itai Y. Slightly flexed knee position within a
[6] Munk PL, Hilborn MD, Vellet AD, Dumas MD, Romano CC. Diagnostic standard knee coil: MR delineation of the anterior cruciate ligament.
equivalence of conventional and fast spin echo magnetic resonance Eur Radiol 1998;8:113–5.
imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Australas Radiol [28] Robertson PL, Schweitzer ME, Bartolozzi AR, Ligoni A. Anterior
1997;41:238–42. cruciate ligament tears: evaluation of multiple signs with MR imaging.
[7] Ross G, Chapman AW, Newberg AR, Scheller Jr AD. Magnetic Radiology 1994;193:829.
resonance imaging for the evaluation of acute posterolateral complex [29] Tung GA, Davis LM, Wiggins ME, Fadale PD. Tears of the anterior
injuries of the knee. Am J Sports Med 1997;25(4):444–8. cruciate ligament: primary and secondary signs at MR imaging.
[8] Ho CP, Marks PH, Steadman JR. MR imaging of knee anterior cruciate Radiology 1993;188:661.
ligament and associated injuries in skiers. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N [30] Brandser EA, Riley MA, Berbaum KS, el-Khoury GY, Bennett DL.
Am Feb 1999;7(1):117–30. MR imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament injury: independent value
[9] Tsai K-J, Chiang H, Jiang C-C. Magnetic resonance imaging of anterior of primary and secondary signs. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:121.
cruciate ligament rupture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004;5:21–6. [31] Fitzgerald SW, Remer EM, Friedman H, Rogers LF, Hendrix RW,
[10] Bennett DL, George MJ, El-Khoury GY, Stanley MD, Sundaram M. Schafer MF. MR evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament: value of
Anterior rim tibial plateau fractures and posterolateral corner knee supplementing sagittal images with coronal and axial images. Am J
injury. Emerg Radiol 2003;10:76–83. Roentgenol 1993;160:1233.
D. Klass et al. / The Knee 14 (2007) 339–347 347

[32] Vahey TN, Hunt JE, Shelbourne KD. Anterior translocation of the tibia [48] Dowdy PA, Vellet KD, Fowler PJ, Marks PH. Magnetic resonance
at MR imaging: a secondary sign of anterior cruciate ligament tear. imaging of the partially torn anterior cruciate ligament: an in vitro animal
Radiology 1993;187:817–9. model with correlative histopathology. Clin J Sport Med 1994;4(3):
[33] Umans H, Wimpfheimer O, Haramati N, Applbaum YH. Diagnosis of 187–91.
partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: value of MR [49] Smith KL, Daniels JL, Arnoczky SP, Dodds JA. Effect of joint position
imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:893–7. and ligament tension on the MR signal intensity of the cruciate
[34] Veltri DM, Deng XH, Torzilli PA, Warren RF. The role of the cruciate ligaments of the knee. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:819.
and posterolateral ligaments in stability of the knee. Am J Sports Med [50] Higueras Guerrero V, Torregrosa Andrés A, Martí-Bonmatí L, Casillas
1995;23(4):436–43. C, Sanfeliu M. Synovialisation of the torn anterior cruciate ligament of
[35] Veltri DM, Warren RF. Posterolateral instability of the knee. J Bone the knee: comparison between magnetic resonance and arthroscopy.
Joint Surg 1994;76-A(3):460–72. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1796–9.
[36] Watanabe Y, Moriya H, Takahashi K, Yamagata M. Functional anatomy of [51] Lintner DM, Kamaric E, Moseley JB, Noble PC. Partial tears of the
the posterolateral structures of the knee. Arthroscopy 1993;9(1):57–62. anterior cruciate ligament. Are they clinically detectable? Am J Sports
[37] Seebacher J, Inglis AE, Marshall JL, Warren RF. The structure of the Med 1995;23:111.
posterolateral aspect of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64-A [52] Kennedy JC, Hawkins RJ, Willis RB, Danylchuk KD. Tension studies
(4):536–41. of human knee ligaments; yield point, ultimate failure and disruption of
[38] Murphy BJ, Smith RL, Uribe JW, Janecki CJ, Hechtman KS, the cruciate and tibial collateral ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg Am
Mangasarian RA. Bone signal abnormalities in the posterolateral tibia 1976;58:350–5.
and lateral femoral condyle in complete tears of the anterior cruciate [53] Hollister MC. Dedicated extremity MR imaging of the knee. Magn
ligament: a specific sign? Radiology 1992;182:221–4. Reson Imaging Clin N Am May 2000;2(8):225–41.
[39] Fowler PJ. Bone injuries associated with anterior cruciate ligament [54] Harish S, O'Donnell P, Connell D, Saifuddin A. Imaging of the
disruption. Arthroscopy 1994;10(4):453–60. posterolateral corner of the knee. Clin Radiol Jun 2006;61(6):457–66.
[42] Vellet AD, Marks P, Fowler P, Munro T. Accuracy of nonorthogonal [55] Shelbourne KD, Nitz PA. The O'Donoghue triad revisited. Combined
magnetic resonance imaging in acute disruption of the anterior cruciate knee injuries involving anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligament
ligament. Arthroscopy 1989;5(4):287. tears. Am J Sports Med 1991;19(5):474–7.
[43] Oberlander MA, Shalvoy RM, Hughston JC. The accuracy of the [56] O'Shea KJ, Murphy KP, Heekin RD, Herzwurm PJ. The diagnostic
clinical knee examination documented by arthroscopy. Am J Sports accuracy of history, clinical examination, and the radiographs in the
Med 1993;21(6):773–8. evaluation of traumatic knee disorders. Am J Sports Med Mar–Apr
[44] Duncan JB, Hunter R, Purnell, Freeman J. Meniscal injuries associated 1996;24(2):164–7.
with acute anterior cruciate ligament tears in alpine skiers. Am J Sports [57] Gelb HJ, Glasgow SG, Sapega AA, Torg JS. Magnetic resonance
Med 1995;23(2):170–2. imaging of knee disorders. Clinical value and cost-effectiveness in a
[45] Barber FA. Snow skiing combined anterior cruciate ligament/medial sports medicine practice. Am J Sports Med Jan–Feb 1996;24(1):99–103.
collateral ligament disruptions. Arthroscopy 1994;10(1):85–9. [41] Schweitzer ME, Cervilla V, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Resnick D. The
[46] Niitsu M, Anno I, Fukubayashi T, Shimojo H, Kuno S, Akisada M. PCL line: an indirect sign of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Clin
Tears of the anterior cruciate ligaments and menisci: evaluation with Imaging 1992;16:43–8.
cine MR imaging. Radiology 1991;176:276. [40] Schweitzer ME, Mitchell DG, Ehrlich MS. The patella tendon:
[47] Karzel RP, Friedman MJ. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using thickening internal signal, buckling and other MR variants. Skeletal
central one-third of the patellar tendon. In: Aichroth PM, Cannon DW, Radiol 1993;22:411–6.
Disnitz M, editors. Knee surgery: current practice. London: Martin
Dunitz; 1992. p. 138.

You might also like