For Internal Use Only For Internal Use Only: Lecture 3: Discourse Analysis
For Internal Use Only For Internal Use Only: Lecture 3: Discourse Analysis
1. What is Discourse?
I found
myself
discourse
Lecture 3: Discourse analysis useless.
hated
enjoying
sentence
hated,
I actually felt tired of phrase enjoying
y
sitting doing nothing.
And I hated enjoying
nl
nl
the unemployment enjoy,
benefit. I found myself word -ing
eo
eo
useless. Then I decided
to look for a job.
us morpheme
us
al
al
ern
ern
Main issues Example: Is this a discourse?
nt
nt
ri
ri
1. What is Discourse ?
• A: The grass needs cutting.
fo
fo
2. What is Discourse Analysis? • B: It’s nearly 10 o’clock.
• A: He’ll wait.
3. How is DA different from Pragmatics? • B: Like last week and the week before.
• A: The Robinsons are coming tomorrow.
4. Some key concepts in DA?
• B: It’s starting to rain anyway. (R.Bolitho)
y
contexts in which it is used.
nl
nl
eo
discourse
us
us
al
al
ern
ern
Discussion
nt
nt
ri
• DISCOURSE: a general term for examples of you study using discourse analysis?
fo
fo
y
influenced by co-text and
nl
nl
sociological phenomena doesn’t suit her. She consists of three letters.
DA is closer to linguistics Pragmatics is closer to
However, a letter isn’t as fast as a telephone
eo
eo
sociolinguistics and sociology.
us call.
us
al
al
ern
ern
4. Some key concepts in DA Cohesion and Coherence
nt
nt
Cohesion Coherence
• Cohesion
ri
ri
Cohesion is concerned with Coherence is concerned with
• Coherence
fo
fo
formal surface structures the sequencing of the
(syntax and lexis) to interact configuration of the concepts
with underlying semantic and relation of the textual
relations or underlying world which underlie and are
functional coherence to realised by the surface text
create textual unity
12
y
– 3. social context
– picture.
nl
nl
4.charateristics of conventionalized types of discourse
– 5. cultural framework, values.
eo
eo
us
us
al
al
ern
ern
nt
REFERENCE
Cohesive devices
ri
ri
Reference
fo
fo
EXOPHORIC ENDOPHORIC
Substitution
REFERENCE REFERENCE
Ellipsis
Conjunctive cohesion
ANAPHORIC CATAPHORIC
Lexical cohesion REFERENCE REFERENCE
Reference Reference
y
money. Andy, Dave, Bob, Phil and
nl
nl
unemployment. Stephen.
eo
eo
us
us
al
al
ern
ern
Reference Ellipsis
nt
nt
• anaphoric reference: If a reference is
ri
ri
• ellipsis: the omission of elements
referring back to something normally required by the grammar which
fo
fo
• E.g.: the speaker / writer assumes are obvious
Some people think that they can become from the context and therefore need not
rich without working hard. That’s a big be raised. So the structure has a “missing”
mistake. element which is supplied by the context.
Ellipsis Substitution
• Eg: • Eg:
You label and I’ll stack 1. I don’t like this vase. Give me the black
(two people labelling and stacking documents) one.
2. - John does smoke?
- How much does it cost you? - I’m sure he does.
y
y
nl
nl
- 60 dollars 3. - I want to go home
eo
eo
- Me too.
us
us
al
al
ern
ern
Substitution Conjunction
nt
nt
ri
ri
fo
y
attributed to tourism. But the fact that
nl
nl
Korea says they will only do so if their conditions
visitors spent their money in a variety of are to be observed by the White House.
eo
eo
ways affect other things, too.
us
us
al
al
ern
ern
Conjunction Lexical cohesion
nt
nt
There are also many problems concerning • synonymy: Lexical cohesion results from
ri
ri
tourism in the Lake District. Many roads in the use of synonyms or near synonyms to
fo
fo
the region are extremely narrow. avoid repetition.
Moreover, because car park fills up during Eg: The US began dropping out of the
busy periods, many visitors park across program in 1977. France shut down its
gateways. The result is inevitable commercial Phoenix breeder in 1990. Germany
congestion. abandoned its completed reactor in 1991. Last
week, Britain cancelled its fast breeder program.
Lexical cohesion
• antonymy: Cohesion may also result from
the use of antonyms, especially when
there is a contrast between two subjects in
a discourse.
Eg: Today’s men complaint about the
y
Lexical cohesion
nt
Introduction to Linguistics 2 15