The Agile Service Management Guide: by Jayne Gordon Groll
The Agile Service Management Guide: by Jayne Gordon Groll
• The Scrum Guide by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland, July, 2013
• The ITSM Process Design Guide by Donna Knapp, ISBN: 978-1-60427-049-5 August 2010
• INVEST in Good Stories, and SMART Tasks by Bill Wake, August,2003
• Scrum.org
• ITIL® is a registered trade mark of AXELOS Limited. Figures with "Based on AXELOS ITIL®
material. Reproduced under license from AXELOS." are from ITIL® Service Lifecycle Publication
Suite Books © Crown copyright 2011. Reproduced under license from AXELOS Limited.
Jayne Groll is an ITIL Expert, Certified ScrumMaster, Certified Agile Service Manager (CASM) and
Certified Process Engineer (CPDE). She has over 25 years of IT management experience that spans
multiple industries including legal, telecommunications, retail, non-profit, insurance and hospitality.
Jayne is co-founder of the DevOps Institute whose mission is to bring enterprise level DevOps training
and certification to the IT market. Jayne is also President and co-founder of ITSM Academy, an ITIL
and ITSM training organization. She is active in both the DevOps and ITSM communities and is a
frequent webinar and conference speaker.
The inspiration for Agile Service Management grew out of Jayne’s recognition that end-to-end IT agility
could only be achieved if Agile thinking and practices were exercised by both development and
operational teams.
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 5
Being Agile................................................................................................................................................... 5
The Agile Manifesto .................................................................................................................................... 6
What is Agile Service Management? .......................................................................................................... 7
Agile Frameworks and Methods ................................................................................................................. 8
Agile Process Design ................................................................................................................................. 11
Scrum Basics.............................................................................................................................................. 12
Agile Service Management Roles.............................................................................................................. 15
Agile Service Management Artifacts......................................................................................................... 18
Agile Service Management Events............................................................................................................ 21
Agile Process Improvement ...................................................................................................................... 27
Tools for Agile Service Management ........................................................................................................ 29
Getting Started.......................................................................................................................................... 30
Glossary of Terms ..................................................................................................................................... 31
While devices and applications are being introduced faster than ever before, it is the service behind the
technology that is still most important to the customer. As a result, IT will always need to manage its services
and IT service management (ITSM) practices and processes will always be necessary. The challenge is adapting
service management practices to changing times so they can enable IT to go faster and deliver more ongoing
value to the customer.
New capabilities require new ways of thinking and performing. IT must learn to be more agile.
Being Agile
The MacMillan Dictionary defines “agile” as
Able to move quickly and easily; able to think quickly, solve problems, and have new ideas.
Too often in IT, the concept of “being agile” is equated to “doing Scrum.” While Scrum is an excellent
framework for managing complex projects, the application of Scrum practices does not necessarily increase an
organization’s agility. Software developers recognized this many years ago when they crafted the Agile
Manifesto’s guiding values and principles. The tenets of agility must first be understood before embarking on
agile practices such as Scrum and other frameworks.
Being agile is a state of mind. It is more perspective than prescription. In order for an organization to “be agile,”
they must also be
• Customer-centric
• Lean
• Collaborative
• Communicative
• Adaptive
• Measurable
• Consistent
• Results-oriented
• Reflective
While we value the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.
At first glance, the Agile Manifesto may seem to advocate against formal service management. Not true. By the
authors’ own admission, the Agile Manifesto was not meant to be anti-methodology but rather an attempt to
restore balance. It is a reminder to implement “just enough” of the items on the right – process, tools,
documentation, contracts and plans - to make the outcome items on the left amazing!
1. Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer
through early and continuous delivery
of valuable
software.
2. Welcome changing requirements, even late in development. Agile processes harness change for the
customer's competitive advantage.
3. Deliver working software frequently, from a couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a
preference
to the shorter timescale.
4. Business people and developers must work
together daily throughout the project.
5. Build projects around motivated individuals.
Give them the environment and support they need, and
trust them to get the job done.
6. The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is
face-to-face conversation.
7. Working software is the primary measure of progress.
8. Agile processes promote sustainable development.
The sponsors, developers, and users should be
able
to maintain a constant pace indefinitely.
9. Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility.
10. Simplicity--the art of maximizing the amount of work not done--is essential.
11. The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams.
12. At regular intervals, the team reflects on how
to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its
behavior accordingly.
There is clearly alignment between the objectives of the Agile Manifesto and the objectives of service
management. Unfortunately, that alignment does not necessarily translate into end-to-end agility. IT must
now learn to be agile throughout the entire service lifecycle - from concept to retirement.
• Ensuring that agile values and principles are embedded into every service management process from
design through implementation and continual improvement
• Improving IT’s entire ability to meet customer requirements faster
• Being effective and efficient (lean)
• Designing processes with “just enough” scalable control and structure
• Provide services that deliver ongoing customer value
Agile Service Management encourages a continuous learning environment and promotes better collaboration
between development and operational teams by cross-pollinating vocabulary and methods.
There are two aspects of Agile Service Management: Agile Process Design and Agile Process Improvement.
Agile Process Design applies the same approach to process design that software developers apply to product
development. Each process is built and potentially released in small, frequent increments. New procedures and
behaviors are introduced gradually, providing greater opportunity for normalization as well more frequent
feedback and input to guide the future direction of the process.
An iterative and incremental approach to process design also allows ITSM processes to mature organically and
holistically. Dependent increments can be built simultaneously or in succession. Most importantly, the
organization can test the boundaries of “just enough” process throughout the service lifecycle.
Agile Process Design does not attempt to redefine the underlying principles of process design. There are solid,
proven best practice approaches for process design, including those described in The ITSM Process Design Guide
by Donna Knapp. Agile Service Management supplements those principles with agile thinking and practices.
Agile Process Improvement seeks to continually align service management with Agile values and principles as
part of Continual Service Improvement (CSI). Processes are regularly audited and reviewed to ensure that they
are at the right level of control and do not drift from “just enough” to “too much” or “not enough”. Most
importantly, Agile Process Improvement identifies and eliminates bottlenecks or waste in order to keep ITSM
relevant, efficient and effective in the face of changing customer requirements.
Agile Service Management is framework agnostic and does not attempt to redefine any of the ITSM processes.
ITIL® and other service management frameworks have done an excellent job of describing best practices for
managing IT services, including the processes that are necessary for a complete service lifecycle. Agile Service
Management supplements those frameworks with agile thinking and practices.
Scrum
“simple framework for effective team collaboration on complex projects. Scrum provides a small set of
rules that create “just enough” structure for teams to be able to focus their innovation on solving what
might otherwise be an insurmountable challenge.”
Scrum is not a technique or process for building products. It is a deceptively simple framework for managing
projects. While originally created for software development, its iterative and incremental approach has been
applied to many other types of projects, including Agile Service Management.
Agile Process Design adapts the Scrum roles, events and artifacts to the design and implementation of service
management processes.
Kanban Boards support Agile Service Management. A Kanban Board can be used to manage the flow of process
design activities or to identify bottlenecks in processes such as Change Management, Release Management or
Problem Management.
ITSM
While IT service management is often overlooked as an Agile practice, it is the integrated approach to managing
IT services that actually enables IT to meet customer requirements in a timely
manner. Whether formalized or not, ITSM processes transcend every aspect of
the service lifecycle from design, development, deployment to operation and
retirement.
DevOps
DevOps is a cultural and professional movement that stresses communication, collaboration, integration and
automation between software developers and IT operations professionals.
The goal of DevOps is to cross traditional silos, instill shared accountabilities and improve the flow of work
between development and operational teams. Improved workflow, shorter feedback loops, shared practices
and automation help the entire IT supply chain increase its rate of production and time to value.
Continuous delivery
Continuous delivery is a software development practice where software is always in a releasable state. It allows
organizations to rapidly deploy enhancements and fixes when needed. Continuous delivery relies on automated
testing and deployment as well as good collaboration between development and operational teams (DevOps).
Continuous delivery is not the same as continuous deployment. Continuous deployment sends the release
immediately into the production as soon as it is completed. Continuous delivery stages the release so it could be
deployed quickly whenever it is needed. Processes such as Change Management and Release Management
will need to be much more agile in environments where continuous delivery is practiced.
Continuous integration is a software development practice where a team of developers create separate pieces
of code that are regularly integrated onto a central server. Each integration goes through an automated build
and test process to detect errors and defects.
Continuous integration leverages the capabilities and simultaneous work of multiple developers resulting in
faster software builds. Early and regular integration testing identifies correctable defects at the source.
Continuous integration aligns development standards within the organization and ensures that quality is built
into the product throughout all phases of development.
Lean
Originally derived from the Toyota Production System, Lean is a production philosophy that seeks to create
more value for customers with fewer resources and less waste. Lean considers any activity that does not
contribute value as “waste.”
While conceived for manufacturing purposes, lean thinking has now been introduced across the business
enterprise.
Lean IT
Applying the key ideas behind lean production to the development and management of IT products and
services
Lean Enterprise
Creating an organization that strategically applies the key ideas behind lean production across the entire
business
Agile Service Management strives to take a lean approach by eliminating waste, getting more done with fewer
resources and creating customer value faster by making processes and services more agile.
An Agile process is one that delivers “just enough” structure and control to enable the organization to achieve
its outcomes in the most expeditious, effective and efficient way possible. An Agile process is easy to
understand, easy to follow and prizes its collaboration and outcomes more than its artifacts.
The waterfall model is a sequential approach to software development where each phase of the process flows
the project further downward until the product is built, tested, deployed and ready to maintain.
While the waterfall model is associated with software development, process designers often take a similar
sequential approach in their projects.
There are several challenges when using the waterfall model to design processes including
The bodies of knowledge behind ITIL® and other ITSM frameworks do not necessarily promote a waterfall or
sequential approach to end-to-end process design. In fact, most frameworks recommend an integrated process
approach as described ISO/IEC 20000, the international standard for service management.
While there is some benefit to methodically moving down a project waterfall, there is also a risk that climbing
back up the waterfall may be more difficult and time consuming than expected.
The net result will be an agile process that delivers “just enough” structure and control while
How much is “just enough” process? The answer will vary from organization to organization and process to
process. Business requirements, governance, risk and compliance will be important factors. Identifying the
balance between just enough and too much process will take time, practice and stakeholder engagement.
Like a Minimum Viable Product in software development, a Minimum Viable Process has three characteristics
It is much easier to add to a process incrementally than it is to scale a process back later. A MVP approach
ensures that the core elements of a process are designed and introduced first. It strips away the “wants” from
the “needs.” It provides a basis for dialogue and feedback so that future development will provide ongoing
value to those who rely on the process.
Scrum Basics
In many organizations, Scrum has become the preferred method for managing software development projects.
Scrum embodies the values and principles of the Agile Manifesto and focuses on getting more done. By its own
admission, Scrum is lightweight, simple to understand yet difficult to master.
Agile Service Management captures the essence of Scrum within the context of process design and process
improvement. While some of the roles, events and artifacts have been adapted, the core concepts, rules and
processes are the same.
A comparison chart of Scrum and Agile Service Management counterparts precedes each section within Agile
Service Management.
Scrum is founded on empirical process control where knowledge comes from experience, decisions are based on
what is known and three pillars underpin the entire framework.
Transparency
Workflows and progress towards the Sprint Goal are made visible through daily standups, Kanban
Boards, planned events and other methods. Common standards, vocabulary and definitions are shared
by all stakeholders.
Inspection
Scrum artifacts are regularly inspected to help assess progress towards or deviations from a Sprint Goal.
Adaptation
Workflows are adapted as soon as possible if a deviation, impediment or other need is detected during
inspection.
Scrum Values
Scrum defines five values that Scrum teams should embrace and demonstrate at all times
The following are key terms and concepts that will be used throughout this Guide. In Scrum, these are defined
in the context of a “product”. In Agile Service Management, they may be adapted to the context of a “process”.
A more complete glossary is appended to the end of this guide.
Scrum Guide
A document that describes Scrum concepts and practices, written by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland
Product/Process Backlog
A prioritized list of functional and non-functional requirements for a system or process; usually
expressed as user stories
User Story
A statement written from the user’s perspective that describes what a user wants to do with a feature
of the software or aspect of a process
Increment
Potentially shippable completed work that is the outcome of a Sprint
Sprint
A period of 2-4 weeks during which an increment of product work is completed
Sprint Goal
The purpose and objective of a Sprint, often expressed as a business problem that is going to be solved
Sprint Backlog
Defines the work that must be completed during the Sprint
Burndown Chart
Shows how much work is left over a period of time for a product or Sprint
Definition of Done
Shared understanding of what it means for work to be complete
Timebox
The maximum duration of an event
Daily Scrum
A fifteen-minute daily meeting that synchronizes work completed since the prior meeting and forecasts
the work to be done before the next one
Impediment
Anything that prevents a Team member from performing work as efficiently as possible
Velocity
How much product or process backlog effort a Team can handle in a single Sprint
Additional definitions are contained in the glossary at the back of this guide.
The Scrum framework is built around the interaction and rules that govern roles, artifacts and events.
• 3 Roles
• 4 Artifacts
• 5 Events
In the Scrum Guide, these are defined in the context of a “product.” In Agile Service Management these are
adapted to the context of a “process.”
Product vs Process
Software products and service management processes are not fundamentally different. Both shape behaviors,
enable people to “do something” and have defined inputs and outputs. Customer requirements drive design
and development and are usually captured in some type of document or repository. Products and processes
each benefit from having an accountable owner. Cross-functional expertise is essential in order to create and
maintain the product or process. Products are often built to replicate processes.
Scrum roles, artifacts and events can be adapted to Agile Service Management, allowing ITSM processes to be
designed iteratively and in complete, potentially releasable increments.
• Self-organizing
• Cross-functional
• Without titles
• Without sub-teams
• Accountable for the work produced as a whole regardless of individual skills or experience
A self-organizing team understands what it takes to get things done. For each increment of work, they are
provided a goal, a backlog of tasks, a completion date and a clear and shared Definition of Done. The Team
agrees on an approach for completing the work and meeting the goal. Essentially, the Team is given the
“what”; they collectively determine the “how.”
• Stable
• Trusting
• Empowered
• Motivated
• Accountable
• Focused
• Business centric
• Communicative
• Quality driven
Different perspectives and cross-functional skills are essential to an Agile Service Management Team.
Membership should include a
• Process Owner
• Agile Service Manager
• Customer and/or process practitioner
• Process architect
• Tool administrator
• Change Manager
• Documenter
The Agile Service Management Team must include a customer or practitioner representative.
Each member of the Team will work on some aspect of items from the Process Backlog. None are observers.
The Team should have at least three members but no more than nine to ensure sufficient cross functional skills
and the ability to self organize. Members may be on multiple teams, although it is recommended that an
individual not work on more than two process Teams at any given time.
Velocity
Velocity is a metric that estimates how much of the Process Backlog a Team can handle in a single Sprint. The
more mature and stable the Team, the higher the Team’s velocity (or ability to absorb and complete work).
Velocity is often measured by work accomplished during past Sprints and serves as a predictor of future Team
performance.
Most service management frameworks advocate for a Process Owner role that is accountable for the end-to-end
results of the process.
Frameworks such as ITIL® do a good job of describing the responsibilities of a Process Owner for a specific
process. The Agile Process Owner role supplements the Process Owner role description by adding
responsibilities for integrating Scrum practices and instilling agile thinking into the process.
The key responsibility of the Process Owner is to create, manage, prioritize and own the Process Backlog. The
Process Backlog is the single source of current or future requirements for a single ITSM process including
activities, tools, plans, interfaces, documentation, training and improvements.
The Process Owner has ultimate authority over the items in the Process Backlog and ensures that the items are
clear and visible. This role understands how to prioritize items in the Process Backlog and helps the Team
understand the next process increment. The Process Owner is the only individual who can change the Team’s
direction and/or add, remove or cancel items in a Sprint.
The Process Owner is not necessarily responsible for performing any or all of the tasks associated with managing
a process. Depending on the size and complexity of the organization, the Process Owner may assign one or
more roles to oversee day-to-day process execution.
The Agile Service Manager is the operational process counterpart to development’s product ScrumMaster.
While the context is different, the role and its responsibilities are very similar.
The Agile Service Manager does not manage the Team. The Team is self-organizing. The Agile Service Manager
is a servant-leader that helps the Process Owner integrate the guidance between ITSM and Scrum in order to
build and maintain an accurate and relevant Process Backlog. The Agile Service Manager coaches the Team and
helps the members write effective process-related user stories.
Most importantly, the Agile Service Manager protects the Team and does everything possible to ensure its
success. This includes helping those outside the Team understand how to (and how not to) interact with the
Team. The Agile Service Manager educates the organization on Agile values and Scrum practices so that
everyone knows what to expect.
The Agile Service Manager bridges a relationship with the organization’s software development ScrumMasters.
Cross-populating Agile practices, vocabulary and automation across all sides of IT will serve to increase speed
and consistency. Collaboration between Agile Service Managers and ScrumMasters helps to create and
maintain a DevOps culture.
The Process Backlog is the single source of current or future requirements including process
activities, tool updates, plans, interfaces, documentation, training and improvements for a single ITSM process.
The Process Backlog continually evolves, is regularly re-prioritized and is never complete. It exists as long as the
process exists. It is solely owned and managed by the Process Owner.
The form and format of the Process Backlog is not prescribed – items can be captured in anything from a
Kanban Board to a spreadsheet to a database. It should be visible to all process stakeholders and readily
available for inspection.
A user story is a simple statement that describes what a user or process practitioner wants from an aspect of
the process. It is always written from the user’s perspective and in their words. It is not meant to include all of
the details about the process aspect but is intended to encourage further dialogue and collaboration. User
stories are generally captured on index cards or sticky notes. That fact alone should demonstrate how succinct
the user story should be.
In 2003, Bill Wake recommended the INVEST model to describe the elements of a good user story
• Independent
• Negotiable
• Valuable
• Estimable
• Small
• Testable
A process user story can be written for any aspect of the process including an activity, a procedure or process
artifact.
The Process Backlog should be refined regularly to add detail, estimates and prioritization to Process Backlog
items. The Process Owner and the Team will determine when and how the Process items should be reviewed
and refined. As items become higher priorities, the amount of detail needed will become greater and
therefore refinement more necessary. Details can come from a variety of sources, but the Team is responsible
for updating the work estimates as important inputs into Sprint Planning.
Each user story in the Process Backlog should be refined with at least the following details
Process Increments
A Process Increment is a potentially releasable and completed aspect of the process that was the pre-defined
outcome of a Sprint. A Process Activity Increment could be an activity, procedure or work instruction.
The Process Increment is defined during the Sprint Planning Meeting. It is built during the Sprint from items in
the Sprint Backlog.
A Process Increment is considered finished when it meets the agreed Definition of Done. It is demonstrated
and discussed during the Sprint Review meeting. The Process Owner then decides whether and when the
Process Increment should be released.
The Team and process stakeholders must share an understanding of the “definition of done” for each Process
Backlog item or Process Increment.
The Definition of Done is critical to Sprint Planning. It guides how many items can be added to the Sprint
Backlog and reasonably accomplished during the Sprint. As the Team’s velocity increases, their ability to get
more “done” in each Sprint will also increase.
The Definition of Done may vary from Process Increment to Process Increment depending on scope of work in
the Sprint Backlog. Process Activity Increments should be considered “done” when the following questions
have been answered
In simple terms, the Definition of Done is when you do not need to think about it anymore.
The Sprint Backlog is a subset of the Process Backlog and forecasts what increment of the process will be
designed during the next Sprint. It is created during the Sprint Planning Meeting and documents all of the
items that will be necessary in order to meet the Sprint Goal. It should be highly visible and available for
inspection.
The Sprint Backlog provides a central artifact around which the Team can self-organize in order to meet the
Sprint Goal. It should have enough detail so that the Team understands the Definition of Done and can inspect
progress during the Daily Scrum.
The Sprint Backlog expires at the end of the Sprint – hopefully with all items completed. Outstanding items do
not automatically carry over to the next Sprint. They are reprioritized with other Process Backlog items and
considered during the next Sprint Planning Meeting.
A Burndown Chart is a graph that shows the trend of completed and remaining work over a specified time
period such as the timebox of the Sprint or the planned rollout of the new or improved process. The most
common types of Burndown Charts are the Process Burndown and the Sprint Burndown.
The Sprint Burndown is particularly important since it visually demonstrates whether the Team is on course to
complete the Sprint on time. It also shows where they may be ahead or behind schedule, whether they are
under or over-allocated. The Burndown Chart is a useful tool for conducting a post-sprint analysis of the
Team’s velocity.
Scrum prescribes a maximum duration or “timebox” for each event. The timebox range depends on the length
of the Sprint (from two weeks to one month).
Timeboxes
Event Timebox
Process Planning Meeting (optional) Not timeboxed
Sprint Planning Meeting 4 to 8 hours
Sprint 2 to 4 weeks
Daily Scrum 15 minutes
Sprint Review 2 to 4 hours
Sprint Retrospective 1.5 to 3 hours
The Process Planning Meeting is a high level planning event that establishes the Process Definition Document for
a single process. Outcomes of the meeting include a definition of the
This event is not timeboxed, mainly because it may take multiple meetings to establish the high level Process
Definition Document. While Scrum considers a Release Planning Meeting to be optional, Agile Service
Management strongly recommends that this event occur in order to plan the end-to-end process before it is
broken down into Process Increments.
The ITSM Process Design Guide by Donna Knapp provides detailed guidance on creating a Process Definition
Document.
The Sprint Planning Meeting is timeboxed for 4 to 8 hours which demonstrates the importance of proper Sprint
Planning. The Agile Service Manager facilitates the meeting and the Process Owner describes the next Process
Increment. The entire Team collaborates on planning the details of the next Sprint.
Inputs to the Sprint Planning Meeting include the Process Backlog, the past velocity of the Team, the availability
of Team members and the dependencies on other processes and tools. Only the Team can determine how
much it can accomplish during the next Sprint.
The Sprint Planning Meeting is also where the Team begins to self-organize by determining how they will
accomplish the Sprint Goal. They plan their approach and prioritize the items going into the Sprint Backlog. By
the end of the Sprint Planning meeting, the Team should be able to articulate what they are going to accomplish
and how they are going to do it.
The Sprint
A Sprint is a period of 2 to 4 weeks during which the work needed to meet the Sprint Goal is performed. The
Process Increment is built from items in the Sprint Backlog based on the approach agreed to during Sprint
Planning. Progress is inspected during the Daily Scrum and visualized on the Sprint Burndown Chart. The
Sprint is guided by the Definition of Done.
During the Sprint, the Agile Service Manager keeps the Team focused, coaches the members and stakeholders
on Scrum practices and protects the Team from outside distractions. The Agile Service Manager also removes
impediments whenever possible. The Process Owner ensures that no one else attempts to change the Team’s
priorities or tasks during the Sprint.
Agile Service Management embraces the Scrum principle of being iterative and incremental. Every Sprint is
considered an iteration that progresses the service management process forward by building Process
Increments. When one iteration is completed, another is planned and repeated until all increments of the
process are done.
Sprint Types
Strategic Sprint
A Strategic Sprint is committed to working on the underpinning items from the Process Backlog that are
essential to the process but do not usually appear on the process flowchart. They include
Strategic Sprints follow the rules of any other type of Sprint. They are guided by a Sprint Goal, agreed
Definition(s) of Done and produce a Process Increment that is demonstrated during a Sprint Review.
The first Strategic Sprint will establish a high level Process Definition Document. Subsequent Strategic
Sprint iterations can be planned when they make sense to do so. Planning simultaneous Strategic Sprints
from multiple processes may help to ensure alignment and integration.
Process Activity Sprints are planned in order to complete a Process Increment for a single activity,
procedure or work instruction including
Some activities have too many user stories or are too large to complete in a single Process Activity
Sprint. In this case, the Process Owner should logically group related user stories into smaller Process
Increments that can be planned over multiple Process Activity Sprints. The collective Process
Increments could be released either separately or together.
Continual Service Improvement (CSI) Sprint
A CSI Sprint commits a cycle of work to implementing prioritized improvements from the Process
Backlog. CSI Sprints are based on Deming’s Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) improvement cycle.
A CSI Sprint is usually undertaken as part of Agile Process Improvement. It is an opportunity to adapt
the process based on input and feedback from prior Process Increment releases.
CSI Sprints should be regularly planned throughout the lifecycle of the process to maintain or increase
the process’ agility.
Typecasting Sprints is done solely for the purpose of ensuring that all aspects of the process are
addressed. There is no limit to the number or frequency of each type of Sprint. There may also be other
Sprint cycles that do not fall into a particular type and are just iterations to progress the process
forward.
The Daily Scrum (sometimes called a Daily Standup) is timeboxed for 15 minutes. It is not a status meeting but a
daily opportunity to inspect progress towards the Sprint Goal and identify impediments as quickly as possible.
While observers and stakeholders may attend, Team members are the only ones allowed to speak. Questions
are not allowed during the timebox. The Agile Service Manager facilitates the meeting.
There may be a temptation to hold the Daily Scrum less frequently. The importance of this daily inspection
should not be undervalued – the faster deviations and impediments are identified, the greater the opportunity
to meet the Sprint Goal and get more done. Fifteen minutes a day during an active Sprint is usually time well
spent.
The Sprint Review is timeboxed for 2-4 hours and is attended by the Team and stakeholders. It is an important
opportunity for transparency, inspection and adaptation (the pillars of Scrum).
During the Sprint Review, the Team demonstrates the aspects of the process that were designed during the last
Sprint. The Team shares the challenges they faced, successful resolutions and outstanding issues. The Process
Owner explains the current state of the process and the Process Backlog. The Process Owner also describes any
feedback received from process practitioners about any previously released Process Increments. A decision on
whether the current Process Increment will be released is made.
The Sprint Review allows the Team and stakeholders to discuss the next steps for the process as input to the
next Sprint Planning Meeting.
The Process Owner will decide if the Process Activity Increment should be released. Consideration include
whether
Change fatigue can occur when too many changes are made to a process in rapid succession.
Sprint Retrospective
The Sprint Retrospective is an internal opportunity for the Team to reflect on and inspect the progress and
organization of the last Sprint. In some ways, it resembles the form and format of a post-implementation review
in that it addresses
There is also a risk that people will revert to old ways and potentially “not enough” process control. At that
point, the temptation might be to put in place a more bureaucratic approach.
Agile Process Improvement’s goal is to ensure that service management processes are not
• Bureaucratic
• Unclear
• Constrained
• Time consuming
• Irrelevant
• Circumvented
• Nice on paper, but…
Agile Process Improvement is a key aspect of Continual Service Improvement. Whether a new or existing
process, improvement opportunities should be assessed against Agile values and principles from concept to
retirement.
Agile Process Improvement requires Process Owners to conduct regular audits and reviews of their processes.
While process audits are often undertaken to determine compliance, Agile Process Improvement audits and
reviews also help to
The agility of the process artifacts will help determine whether the process is providing “just enough” structure
and control.
For each artifact, process stakeholders, Team members and others may be asked
Different perspectives will help the Process Owner understand how to keep or improve the value of the process
in the management of IT services.
The Agile Service Manager should help facilitate the audits and assist the Process Owner in collecting and
evaluating the output in line with Agile values and principles.
Agile Process Improvement as an essential element of Continual Service Improvement ensures that agility is as
important to the ongoing relevancy of a process as effectiveness and efficiency. Agile Process Improvement
should therefore overarch the entire service lifecycle.
There will be many opportunities and recommendations for improvements during Continual Service
Improvement and Agile Process Improvement. ITIL® and other ITSM frameworks encourage the creation and
maintenance of a Continual Service Improvement (CSI) Register – a repository for capturing and prioritizing
recommended improvements for a process or service.
In Agile Service Management, the Process Backlog serves as the CSI Register in that it
As described above, a CSI Sprint is an opportunity to commit a cycle of work to implementing a Process
Increment of prioritized improvements. It is based on Deming’s Plan-Do-Check-Act approach and is critical to
successful Agile Service Management. A CSI Sprint can occur whenever it makes sense for new or existing
processes.
All tools currently used as part of an ITSM program are still (if not more) relevant to Agile Service Management
including
Some of the ITSM tools may already be in use by the organization’s operational teams and software
development team. The ability to leverage and share tools may help to cuts costs while potentially increasing
collaboration.
It is important to note that technology alone will not make an organization agile.
Wherever you are in your Agile Service Management journey, remember that it is important to understand what
it means to “be agile” before you attempt to “do agile (or Scrum).”
Start simple and stay simple. Pick one process to pilot as a learning experience. Identify a Process Owner, Agile
Service Manager and stakeholders. Build a small self-organizing team with cross-functional skills and
appropriate levels of ITSM and Agile Service Management training. Engage stakeholders and encourage
feedback.
Don’t rush. Start with a Minimum Viable Process and move forward from there. Introduce the new or improved
process in small, frequent increments. Give the organization time to absorb, adopt and adapt to new behaviors.
Mature the processes holistically and organically. Small, short term wins will deliver greater wins in the long
term.
Glossary of Terms
Agile Process Design The aspect of Agile Service Management (Agile SM) that applies
the same Agile approach to process design as developers do to
software development.
Agile Process Improvement The aspect of Agile SM that aligns Agile values with ITSM
processes through continuous improvement.
Agile Service Management A framework that ensures that ITSM processes reflect Agile values
(Agile SM) and are designed with “just enough” control and structure in
order to effectively and efficiently deliver services that facilitate
customer outcomes when and how they are needed.
Burndown Chart A chart showing the evolution of remaining effort against time.
Continuous delivery A software development practice where software is always in a
releasable state.
Continuous integration A software development practice where members of a team code
separately but integrate their work at least daily. Each integration
goes through an automated build and test to detect errors and
defects so as to allow faster deployments.
Critical success factor Something that must happen for a process, plan, project or other
activity to succeed.
CSI Register A vehicle for recording and managing improvement opportunities
throughout their lifecycle.
Daily Scrum A daily timeboxed event of 15 minutes or less for the Team to re-
plan the next day of work during a Sprint.
Definition of Done A shared understanding of what it means for work to be
complete.
DevOps A cultural and professional movement that stresses
communication, collaboration and integration between software
developers and IT operations professionals.
Impediment Anything that prevents a Team member from performing work as
efficiently as possible.
Increment Potentially shippable completed work that is the outcome of a
Sprint.
ITIL® Set of best practice publications for IT service management.
Published in five core books representing the five stages of the IT
service lifecycle: Service Strategy, Service Design, Service
Transition, Service Operation and Continual Service Improvement.
INVEST A mnemonic was created by Bill Wake as a reminder of the
characteristics of a quality user story
Velocity How much Product Backlog effort a team can handle in a single
Sprint.
Waste Any activity which does not add value to a process.
Waterfall A linear and sequential approach to software development.
There are many frameworks and standards that define best practices for achieving quality IT service
management - ITIL, ISO/IEC 20000, COBIT, CMMI, DevOps, Knowledge-Centered Support, etc. While
each describes processes and practices (what to do), none provide clear, step-by-step methods and
techniques for actually designing, reengineering and improving processes (how to do it).
ITSM Academy’s Agile Service Management certification courses, along with its popular Certified
Process Design Engineer (CPDE)® course, teach you how to (re)engineer and improve quality, lasting
ITSM processes. Our role-based Agile Service Management qualifications focus on the application and
integration of Agile (Scrum) values and practices into service management processes and process
design projects and include:
Certified Agile Service Manager (CASM)®
• Operational equivalent of a Scrum Master
• Responsible for ensuring Agile Service Management theory, practices and rules are understood
Certified Agile Process Owner (CAPO)®
• Operational equivalent of a Scrum Product Owner
• Responsible for maximizing the value of a process and the work of the process improvement
team
Click here to register for one of ITSM Academy’s Agile Service Management classes today.
We look forward to seeing you in class!