Design School and Positioning School Strategies
Design School and Positioning School Strategies
Sadler & Craig (2003) describe strategy as a long duration action plan, drafted for achieving
defined objectives. In Greek language, strategy pertains to the act of leading an army (Hax,
2009). Different types of strategies, developed for resolving day-to-day challenges, form part
of the strategic management process.
Business organizations have always been at the crossroads of options over the fundamental
strategic decisions. Corporate think tanks spend major amounts of their quality time in
debating about the decisions on the forward outlook of the organization. The decisions to
adopt an appropriate short and long term strategy for an organization had always been
debatable. The point of debate had been focused on whether the adopted strategy would result
in enhancing the shareholder value, as it is fundamental to the existence of an organization. It
has been observed that the shareholder value is a function of revenues being generated by the
organization. Thus, the strategists need to worry about whether the organization makes efforts
to reducing the bottom-line vis-à-vis increasing the top line? These questions have never been
easy to answer and the dynamic business environment has further complicated the decision
making. No amount of tactical decision making can resolve these fundamental dilemmas.
Instead, appropriate strategic thinking can enable the top leadership in determining the steer
they want to provide to the organization (Davenport, Leibold, & Voelpel, 2006).
Mintzberg, Henry, Lampel, Joseph, & Ahlstrand, Bruce (1998) explained ten business
strategies, including design and positioning schools in Strategy Safari. The following text
focuses on these two schools of thoughts in the business strategies.
Basic details of each school of strategy is followed by a discussion on the roots of each of the
strategies, risks, uncertainty & its management, influence of market structure and the
environments. The analysis concludes with the comparison between these two schools of
strategic thoughts.