LEGO Education WeDo 2.

0
®

Computational Thinking
Teacher’s Guide

WeDo 2.0
Table of Contents
Introduction to WeDo 2.0 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum Assess with WeDo 2.0
Computational Thinking
3-11 12-28 29-41

The LEGO® Education community is an online community for teachers, administrators, and other professionals in education.
It is a place to connect and share ideas, engage in discussions, and share lesson plans and projects.
The LEGO Education community is only in English.
Developing
Computational
Thinking with
WeDo 2.0 Projects
In this chapter, you will discover how you can use
WeDo 2.0 to develop computational thinking skills in a
science context.
 Introduction to WeDo 2.0

Develop Computational Thinking with LEGO Education WeDo 2.0 Projects ®

LEGO® Education is pleased to present these projects, which have been

specifically designed for use in elementary school classrooms to develop
students’ computational thinking skills.

Computational thinking is a set of skills that everybody can use to solve everyday
life problems. In WeDo 2.0, these skills are developed throughout each phase of
every project. Development opportunities have been identified for you in each of
the projects, it is up to you to focus on the ones that are most relevant to you and
your students.

Every project in WeDo 2.0 combines the use of the LEGO bricks with an iconic
programming language, enabling your students to find solutions to problems while
being introduced to programming principles.

WeDo 2.0 develops computational thinking through coding activities, which bring
students’ creations to life, generating smiles and the desire to discover more.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

4
 Introduction to WeDo 2.0

Computer Science, Computational Thinking, Coding

While the science and engineering fields originated in the early ages of
humankind, computer science has a much younger history. Nevertheless, this STEM Disciplines
young discipline has influenced not only the way we approach science and Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics,
engineering, but also the way we live our lives. Computer Science

Computer Science is a STEM discipline, sharing attributes with science,

technology, engineering, and mathematics.
Develop a mindset and life long set of practices
All STEM disciplines present opportunities to develop a mindset and a lifelong set
of practices. Among these practices, we find the ability to ask questions, to design
solutions, and to communicate results. 1. Ask questions and solve problems.
2. Use models.
Computational thinking is another one of these practices. It is a way in which we 3. Design prototypes.
think and it is a way in which everybody can solve problems. 4. Investigate.
5. Analyze and interpret data.
Computational thinking can be described as a group of skills, one of these skills 6. Use computational thinking.
being algorithmic thinking. “Code” or “coding” can be used to describe the action
of creating an algorithm. a. Decompose
b. Abstract
Coding is therefore one vehicle by which to develop computational thinking within c. Think algorythmically (code)
a STEM context. d. Evaluate
e. Generalise

7. Engage in argument from evidence.

8. Obtain, evaluate, and communicate information.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

5
 Introduction to WeDo 2.0

What is Computational thinking ?

The expression “computational thinking” was first used by Seymour Papert, but
Professor Jeannette Wing is known to have popularized the idea. She defined Computational thinking
computational thinking as: Ways we solve problems

”the thought processes involved in formulating problems and their solutions so that
the solutions are represented in a form that can be effectively carried out by an
information-processing agent.” (Wing, 2011)

Computational thinking is used in various fields and situations, and we use it in our Decompose Evaluate
daily lives. Computational thinking skills are present in science, engineering, and Break down in small parts Improve and debug
mathematics. These skills can be defined as the following:

Decomposition
Generalise Abstract
Decomposition is the ability to simplify a problem into smaller parts in order to Conceptualise and
Recognise patterns
ease the process of finding a solution. By doing so, the problem becomes easier explain ideas
to explain to another person, or to separate into tasks. Decomposition frequently
leads to Generalization.
Think algorithmically
Solving a problem
Example: When going on vacation, the preparation (or project) can be separated
one step at a time
into subtasks: booking the airfare, reserving a hotel, packing a suitcase, etc.

Generalization (Pattern Recognition)

Generalization is the ability to recognize the parts of a task that are known, or have
been seen somewhere else. This frequently leads to easier ways of designing
algorithms.

Example: Traffic lights work by repeating the same series of actions forever.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

6
 Introduction to WeDo 2.0

What is computational thinking ?

Algorithmic Thinking
Algorithmic Thinking is the ability to create an ordered series of steps with the
purpose of solving a problem.

Example one: when we cook from a recipe, we are following a series of steps in
order to prepare a meal.
Example two: when playing with computers, we can code a sequence of actions
that tell the computer what to do.

Evaluating or Debugging
This is the ability to verify whether or not a prototype works as intended, and if not,
the ability to identify what needs to be improved. It is also the process a computer
programmer goes through in order to find and correct mistakes within a program.

Example one: when we’re cooking, we will periodically taste the dish to check
whether or not it is seasoned correctly.
Example two: when we look for spelling mistakes and missing punctuation in our
written work, we are debugging it so that it can be read correctly.

Abstraction
Abstraction is the ability to explain a problem or a solution by removing
unimportant details. In other words, being able to conceptualize an idea.

Example: When describing a bicycle, we use only some details to describe it. We
might mention its type and color, and add more details for someone who has a
real interest in bikes.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

7
 Introduction to WeDo 2.0

A Process for Developing Computational Thinking Skills

Using an Engineering Design Process
When looking for solutions to a problem, engineers use a design process. They Define the problem
go through a series of phases that guide them toward a solution. During each of
these phases, some of their skills are used or developed. It is those skills that we
we refer to as “computational thinking skills.”

In WeDo 2.0, students follow a similar process:

Defining the Problem

Students are presented with a topic that guides them to a problem or to a situation Plan
they wish to improve. Sometimes, a problem can have a lot of details. To make it
easier to solve, the problem can be broken down into smaller parts.

By defining the problem in a simple way and by identifying some success criteria,
students will develop a skill called “Decomposition.”

In other words: Modify

- Is the student able to explain the problem by themselves?
- is the student able to describe how they will evaluate whether or not they were
successful in solving the problem?
- Is the student able to break down the problem into smaller and more Try a solution
manageable parts?

Communicate

©2016 The LEGO Group.

8
 Introduction to WeDo 2.0

A Process for Developing Computational Thinking Skills

Planning
Students should spend some time imagining different solutions to the problem, Define the problem
and then make a detailed plan for executing one of their ideas. They will define
the steps they will need to go through in order to reach the solution. By identifying Decompose
the problem
the parts of the task they might have see before, they will develop a skill called
“Generalization.”

In other words:
- Is the student able to make a list of actions to program?
- Is the student able to identify parts of programs that he or she could use? Plan
- Is the student able to reuse parts of programs?
Generalise
Trying
Each student is then tasked with creating the final version of their solution. In
this phase of the process, they use iconic programing language to activate their
LEGO® models. As the students code their ideas, they develop their Algorithmic
Thinking skills. Modify Think
algorythmically

In other words:
- Is the student able to program a solution to a program? Evaluate
- Is the student able to use sequence, loops, conditional statements, etc.?
the solution Try a solution
Modifying
Students will evaluate their solution according to whether or not their program and
model meet the success criteria. Using their Evaluation skills, they will determine
whether they need to change, fix, debug, or improve some part of their program. Abstract

In other words:
- Is the student making iterations of their program?
- Is the student fixing problems in their program ? Communicate
- Is the student able to judge if the solution is linked to the problem ?

©2016 The LEGO Group.

9
 Introduction to WeDo 2.0

A Process for Developing Computational Thinking Skills

Communicating
Students will present the final version of their solution to the class, explaining how
their solution meets the success criteria. By explaining their solution with the right
level of detail, they will develop their Abstraction and communication skills.

In other words:
- Is the student explaining the most important part of their solution?
- Is the student giving enough detail to enhance comprehension?
- Is the student making sure to explain how their solution meets the success
criteria?

©2016 The LEGO Group.

10
 Introduction to WeDo 2.0

Developing Computational Thinking through Coding

In order to develop their Algorithmic Thinking, students will be introduced to some 6. Conditions
programming principles. As they develop their solutions, they will organize a series Conditions are used by students in order to program actions that are to be
of actions and structures that will bring their models to life. executed only under certain circumstances. Creating conditions within a program
means that some part of the program will never be executed if the condition is
The most common WeDo 2.0 programming principles students will use are: never met. For example, if the Tilt Sensor is tilted left, the motor will start, and if the
sensor is tilted right, the motor will stop; if the Tilt Sensor never tilts left, the motor
1. Output will never start and if it never tilts right, then the motor will never stop.
Output is something that is controlled by the program students are writing.
Examples of outputs for WeDo 2.0 are sounds, lights, display, and turning motors
on and off.

2. Input
Input is information that a computer or device receives. It can be entered through
1 3 1 3 4
the use of sensors in the form of a numeric or text value. For example, a sensor
that detects or measures something (such as distance) converts that value into a
digital input signal so it can be used in a program.

3. Events (Wait for)

Students can tell their program to wait for something to happen before continuing
to execute the sequence of actions. Programs can wait for a specific amount of 2
time, or wait for something to be detected by a sensor.

4. Loop
Students can program actions to be repeated either forever, or for a specific
length of time.

5. Functions
Functions are a group of actions that are to be used together in specific situations.
For example, the group of blocks that could be used to make a light blink would
together be called, “the blink function”.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

11
WeDo 2.0 in
Curriculum
The LEGO® Education WeDo 2.0 projects combine
LEGO® bricks with Next Generation Science Standards
(NGSS). All of the WeDo 2.0 projects are designed to
develop students’ computational thinking skills.
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Computational Thinking in Curriculum

The world is changing, and whether we realize it or not, technology and computer
science shape nearly every aspect of our lives. Students are rapidly becoming
active citizens, and equipping them with the right set of skills has become one of
the nation’s first priorities.

Computational thinking is a set of skills that is spreading worldwide, becoming

a key practice to develop in relation to technology. Already identified by the
NGSS as a practice essential to the Science and Engineering field, computational
thinking has found roots in many other national curriculums both domestically and
abroad.

Computational thinking has become the foundation of standards issued by the

Computer Science Teacher Association (CSTA) and other associations such as
ISTE, Code.org, and Computing at School (the British association responsible for a
globally recognized computing curriculum). All of these organizations have aligned
their curriculums with an emphasis on the development of computational thinking
skills.

These important skills can be developed through engaging activities or projects

that are rooted in real life problem-based situations. To support this development,
LEGO® Education is adding a dedicated series of computational thinking projects
to the science projects that are already available in WeDo 2.0.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

13
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Visual Overview of Guided Projects

1. Moon Base 1
This project is about designing a solution in which a robot would be able to
assemble a base on the moon.

2. Grabbing Objects
This project is about designing a solution for a prosthetic arm that is able to move
small objects around.

3. Send Messages 2
This project is about designing a solution for exchanging information using a
system of signals organized in patterns.

4. Volcano Alert
This project is about designing a device for improving the monitoring of volcanic
activity in order to guide scientific exploration.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

14
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Visual Overview of Open Projects

5. Inspection 51
This project is about designing a solution in which a robot is able to inspect narrow
spaces, guiding its motion with sensors.

6. Emotional Design
This project is about designing a solution in which a robot can display positive
emotions when interacting with people.

7. City Safety 63
This project is about designing a solution to improve safety in a city.

8. Animal Senses
This project is about modeling how animals use their senses to interact with their
environment.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

15
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Potential Flow to develop Computational thinking skills

You can organize the projects as you wish. Each project highlights opportunities Open Projects
for developing computational thinking skills, and it is it up to you to focus on the Use two or three lessons of 45 minutes each to make you own project based
ones that are most relevant to you and your students. Here is one suggested on one of the suggested Open Projects. This project should integrate all of the
sequence, which is based on an increasing level of complexity in the programming programming principles, as well as the computational thinking skills developed
concepts covered: during the Guided Projects.

Getting Started
Use two lessons of 45 minutes each to introduce your students to WeDo 2.0.
Lesson 1, Milo, the Science Rover
Lesson 2, combine Milo’s Motion Sensor, Milo’s Tilt Sensor, and Collaborating

Guided Projects
Use two lessons of 45 minutes each, during which students will program a
sequence of actions.
Lesson 3, Moon Base (Explore and Create phase)
Lesson 4, Moon Base (Test and Share phase)

Use two lessons of 45 minutes each, during which students will use sensors
(inputs).
Lesson 5, Grabbing Objects (Explore and Create phase)
Lesson 6, Grabbing Objects (Test and Share phase)

Use two lessons of 45 minutes each, during which students will use sensors
(inputs), loops, and parallel programming.
Lesson 7, Send Messages (Explore and Create phase)
Lesson 8, Send Messages (Test and Share phase)

Use two lessons of 45 minutes each to introduce your students to conditions, and
how to integrate all of the other programming principles.
Lesson 9, Volcano Alert (Explore and Create phase)
Lesson 10, Volcano Alert (Test and Share phase)

©2016 The LEGO Group.

16
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Potential Flow to develop Computational thinking skills

Getting Started Guided Project - Send Messages
Introduce your students to WeDo 2.0 Students will use sensors (inputs), loops, and parallel programming.

Using a condensed lesson flow

2 x 45 minutes

45 minutes 45 minutes

Guided Project - Moon Base Guided Project - Volcano Alert

Students will program sequences of actions. Students will be introduced to conditions, and to other programming principles.

Using a condensed lesson flow Using a condensed lesson flow

2 x 45 minutes 2 x 45 minutes

Guided Project - Grabbing Objects Open Projects

Students will use sensors (inputs).

Using a condensed lesson flow

2 x 45 minutes

©2016 The LEGO Group.

17
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Curriculum Overview of Guided Projects Organized by NGSS Disciplinary Core Ideas

1 2 3 4
Moon Base Grabbing Objects Send Messages Volcano Alert

Life Sciences

Earth and Space Sciences 4-ESS3-2.

Physical Sciences 4-PS4-3.

Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science K-2-ETS1-3. 3-5-ETS1-1. 3-5-ETS1-1. 3-5-ETS1-1.

3-5-ETS1-1. 3-5-ETS1-2. 3-5-ETS1-2. 3-5-ETS1-2.
3-5-ETS1-2. 3-5-ETS1-3. 3-5-ETS1-3. 3-5-ETS1-3.
3-5-ETS1-3.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

18
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Curriculum Overview of Open Projects Organized by NGSS Disciplinary Core Ideas

5 6 7 8
Inspection Emotional Design City Safety Animal Senses

Life Sciences 4-LS1-2.

Earth and Space Sciences

Physical Sciences

Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science K-2-ETS1-3. K-2-ETS1-3. K-2-ETS1-3. K-2-ETS1-3.

3-5-ETS1-1. 3-5-ETS1-1. 3-5-ETS1-1. 3-5-ETS1-1.
3-5-ETS1-2. 3-5-ETS1-2. 3-5-ETS1-2. 3-5-ETS1-2.
3-5-ETS1-3. 3-5-ETS1-3. 3-5-ETS1-3. 3-5-ETS1-3.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

19
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

NGSS Performance Expectations: Grade Two

Life Science Engineering
2-LS2-1. Plan and conduct an investigation to determine if plants need sunlight K-2-ETS1-1. Ask questions, make observations, and gather information about
and water to grow. a situation people want to change in order to define a simple problem that can be
2-LS2-2. Develop a simple model that mimics the function of an animal in solved through the development of a new or improved object or tool.
dispersing seeds or pollinating plants. K-2-ETS1-2. Develop a simple sketch, drawing, or physical model to illustrate how
2-LS4-1. Make observations of plants and animals to compare the diversity of life the shape of an object helps it function as needed to solve a problem.
in different habitats. K-2-ETS1-3. Analyze data from tests of two objects designed to solve the same
problem to compare the strengths and weaknesses of how each performs.
Physical Science
2-PS1-1. Plan and conduct an investigation to describe and classify different kinds
of materials by their observable properties.
2-PS1-2. Analyze data obtained from testing different materials to determine which
materials have the properties that are best suited for an intended purpose.
2-PS1-3. Make observations to construct an evidence-based account of how an
object made of a small set of pieces can be disassembled and made into a wholly
new object.
2-PS1-4. Construct an argument with evidence that some changes caused by
heating or cooling can be reversed and some cannot.

Earth and Space Science

2-ESS1-1. Use information from several sources to provide evidence that earth
events can occur quickly or slowly.
2-ESS2-1. Compare multiple solutions designed to slow or prevent wind or water
from changing the physical shape of the land.
2-ESS2-2. Develop a model to represent the shapes and kinds of land and bodies
of water in an area.
2-ESS2-3. Obtain information to identify where water is found on earth and
understand that it can be solid or liquid.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

20
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

NGSS Performance Expectations: Grade Three

Physical Science Life Science
3-PS2-1. Plan and conduct an investigation to provide evidence of the effects of 3-LS2-1. Construct an argument that some animals form groups that help
balanced and unbalanced forces on the motion of an object. members survive.
3-PS2-2. Make observations and/or measurements of an object’s motion to provide 3-LS4-1. Analyze and interpret data from fossils to provide evidence of  organisms
evidence that a pattern can be used to predict future motion. and the environments in which they lived long ago.
3-PS2-3. Ask questions to determine cause and effect relationships of electric or 3-LS4-3. Construct an argument with evidence that in a particular habitat, some
magnetic interactions between two objects not in contact with each other. organisms can survive well, some survive less well, and some cannot survive at all.
3-PS2-4. Define a simple design problem that can be solved by applying scientific 3-LS4-4. Make a claim about the merit of a solution to a problem that is caused
ideas about magnets. when the environment changes and the types of plants and animals that live there
may also change.
Earth and Space Science 3-LS1-1. Develop models to describe that organisms have unique and diverse life
3-ESS2-1. Represent data in tables and graphic displays to describe typical cycles, but all have in common birth, growth, reproduction, and death.
weather conditions expected during a particular season. 3-LS3-1. Analyze and interpret data to provide evidence that plants and animals
3-ESS2-2. Obtain and combine information to describe climates in different have traits inherited from parents and that variations of these traits exist within a
regions of the world. group of similar organisms.
3-ESS3-1. Make a claim about the merit of a design solution that reduces 3-LS3-2. Use evidence to support the explanation that traits can be influenced by
the impact of a weather-related hazard. the environment.
3-LS4-2. Use evidence to construct an explanation for how the variations in
Engineering characteristics among individuals of the same species may provide advantages in
3-5-ETS1-1. Define a simple design problem reflecting a need that includes surviving, finding mates, and reproducing.
specified criteria for success, and constraints on materials, time, or cost.
3-5-ETS1-2. Generate and compare multiple, possible solutions to a problem
based on how well each meets the criteria and constraints of the problem.
3-5-ETS1-3. Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and
failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that can
be improved.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

21
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

NGSS Performance Expectations: Grade Four

Energy Earth’s Systems: Processes That Shape the Earth
4-PS3-1. Use evidence to construct an explanation relating the speed of an object 4-ESS1-1. Identify evidence from patterns in rock formations and fossils in rock
to the energy of that object. layers to support an explanation for changes in a landscape over time.
4-PS3-2. Make observations to provide evidence that energy can be transferred 4-ESS2-1. Make observations and/or measurements to provide evidence of
from place to place by sound, light, heat, and electric currents. the effects of weathering or the rate of erosion by water, ice, wind, or vegetation.
4-PS3-3. Ask questions and predict outcomes about the changes in energy that 4-ESS2-2. Analyze and interpret data from maps to describe patterns of earth’s
occur when objects collide. features.
4-PS3-4. Apply scientific ideas to design, test, and refine a device that converts 4-ESS3-2. Generate and compare multiple solutions to reduce the impacts of
energy from one form to another. natural earth processes on humans.
4-ESS3-1. Obtain and combine information to describe the fact that energy
and fuels are derived from natural resources and that their use will affect Engineering
the environment. 3-5-ETS1-1. Define a simple design problem reflecting a need or a want that
includes criteria for success, and constraints on materials, time, or cost.
Structure, Function, and Information Processing 3-5-ETS1-2. Generate and compare possible solutions to a problem based on
4-PS4-2. Develop a model to describe how light reflecting from objects and how well each  meets the criteria and constraints of the problem.
entering the eye of a sighted person allows objects to be seen. 3-5-ETS1-3. Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and
4-LS1-1. Construct an argument that plants and animals have internal and failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that can
external structures that function to support their survival, growth, behavior, and be improved.
reproduction.
4-LS1-2. Use a model to describe how animals receive different types of
information through their senses, then process the information in their brain, and
respond to the information in a range of different ways.

Waves: Waves and Information

4-PS4-1. Develop a model of waves to describe patterns in terms of amplitude
and wavelength, and that waves can cause objects to move.
4-PS4-3. Generate and compare multiple solutions that use patterns for
the transfer of information.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

22
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Curriculum Overview of Guided Projects Organized by NGSS Practices

1 2 3 4
Moon Base Grabbing Objects Send Messages Volcano Alert

Practice One:
Ask questions and define problems

Practice Two:
Develop and use models

Practice Three:
Plan and carry out investigations

Practice Four:
Analyze and interpret data

Practice Five:
Use mathematics and computational thinking

Practice Six:
Construct explanations and design solutions

Practice Seven:
Engage in argument from evidence

Practice Eight:
Obtain, evaluate, and communicate information

©2016 The LEGO Group.

23
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Curriculum Overview of Open Projects Organized by NGSS Practices

5 6 7 8
Inspection Emotional Design City Safety Animal Senses

Practice One:
Ask questions and define problems

Practice Two:
Develop and use models

Practice Three:
Plan and carry out investigations

Practice Four:
Analyze and interpret data

Practice Five:
Use mathematics and computational thinking

Practice Six:
Construct explanations and design solutions

Practice Seven:
Engage in argument from evidence

Practice Eight:
Obtain, evaluate, and communicate information

©2016 The LEGO Group.

24
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Curriculum Overview of Guided and Open Projects Organized by CSTA Standards

4 Volcano Alert

8 Animal Senses
6 Emotional Design
5 Inspection
3 Send Messages
2 Grabbing Objects

7 City Safety
1 Moon Base
Identifier Interim CSTA K–12 CS Standard

K–2 1A-A-3-7 Construct and execute algorithms (sets of step-by-step instructions) that include sequencing and
simple loops to accomplish a task, both independently and collaboratively, with or without a computing
device.

K–2 1A-A-6-8 Analyze and debug (fix) an algorithm that includes sequencing and simple loops, with or without a
computing device.

K–2 1A-C-7-9 Identify and use software that controls computational devices (e.g., use an app to draw on the screen,
use software to write a story or control robots).

K–2 1A-C-7-10 Use appropriate terminology in naming and describing the function of common computing devices
and components (e.g., desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet device, monitor, keyboard, mouse,
printer).

K–2 1A-C-6-11 Identify, using accurate terminology, simple hardware and software problems that may occur during
use (e.g., app or program not working as expected, no sound, device won’t turn on).

K–2 1A-D-7-12 Collect data over time and organize it in a chart or graph in order to make a prediction.

K–2 1A-D-4-13 Use a computing device to store, search, retrieve, modify, and delete information and define the
information stored as data.

K–2 1A-D-4-14 Create a model of an object or process in order to identify patterns and essential elements (e.g., water
cycle, butterfly life cycle, seasonal weather patterns).

©2016 The LEGO Group.

25
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Curriculum Overview of Guided and Open Projects Organized by CSTA Standards

4 Volcano Alert

8 Animal Senses
6 Emotional Design
5 Inspection
3 Send Messages
2 Grabbing Objects

7 City Safety
1 Moon Base
Identifier Interim CSTA K–12 CS Standard

3–5 1B-A-2-1 Apply collaboration strategies to support problem solving within the design cycle of a program.

Use proper citations and document when ideas are borrowed and changed for their own use (e.g.,
3–5 1B-A-7-2
using pictures created by others, using music created by others, remixing programming projects).

Create a plan as part of the iterative design process, both independently and with diverse
3–5 1B-A-5-3
collaborative teams (e.g., storyboard, flowchart, pseudocode, story map).

Construct programs, in order to solve a problem or for creative expression, that includes sequencing,
3–5 1B-A-5-4 events, loops, conditionals, parallelism, and variables, using a block-based visual programming
language or text-based language, both independently and collaboratively (e.g., pair programming).

3–5 1B-A-5-5 Use mathematical operations to change a value stored in a variable.

Decompose (break down) a larger problem into smaller sub-problems, independently or in a

3–5 1B-A-3-6
collaborative group.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

26
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Curriculum Overview of Guided and Open Projects Organized by CSTA Standards

4 Volcano Alert

8 Animal Senses
6 Emotional Design
5 Inspection
3 Send Messages
2 Grabbing Objects

7 City Safety
1 Moon Base
Identifier Interim CSTA K–12 CS Standard

3–5 1B-A-3-7 Construct and execute an algorithm (set of step-by-step instructions) that includes sequencing,
loops, and conditionals to accomplish a task, both independently and collaboratively, with or without a
computing device.

3–5 1B-A-6-8 Analyze and debug (fix) an algorithm that includes sequencing, events, loops, conditionals, parallelism,
and variables.

3–5 1B-C-7-9 Model how a computer system works.(Clarification: only includes basic elements of a computer
system, such as input, output, processor, sensors, and storage.)

3–5 1B-C-7-10 Use appropriate terminology in naming internal and external components of computing devices and
describing their relationships, capabilities, and limitations.

3–5 1B-C-6-11 Identify, using accurate terminology, simple hardware and software problems that may occur during
use, and apply strategies for solving problems (e.g., reboot device, check for power, check network
availability, close and reopen app).

3–5 1B-D-5-12 Create a computational artifact to model the attributes and behaviors associated with a concept (e.g.,
solar system, life cycle of a plant).

3–5 1B-D-5-13 Answer a question by using a computer to manipulate (e.g., sort, total and/or average, chart, graph)
and analyze data that has been collected by the class or student.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

27
 WeDo 2.0 in Curriculum

Curriculum Overview of Guided and Open Projects Organized by CSTA Standards

4 Volcano Alert

8 Animal Senses
6 Emotional Design
5 Inspection
3 Send Messages
2 Grabbing Objects

7 City Safety
1 Moon Base
Identifier Interim CSTA Standard

3–5 1B-D-4-14 Use numeric values to represent non-numeric ideas in the computer (binary, ASCII, pixel attributes
such as RGB).

3–5 1B-I-7-15 Evaluate and describe the positive and negative impacts of the pervasiveness of computers and
computing in daily life (e.g., downloading videos and audio files, electronic appliances, wireless
internet, mobile computing devices, GPS systems, wearable computing).

3–5 1B-I-7-16 Generate examples of how computing can affect society, and also how societal values can shape
computing choices.

3–5 1B-I-1-17 Seek out and compare diverse perspectives, synchronously or asynchronously, to improve a project.

3–5 1B-I-1-18 Brainstorm ways in which computing devices could be made more accessible to all users.

3–5 1B-I-1-19 Explain problems that relate to using computing devices and networks (e.g., logging out to deter
others from using your account, cyberbullying, privacy of personal information, and ownership).

3–5 1B-N-7-20 Create examples of strong passwords, explain why strong passwords should be used, and
demonstrate proper use and protection of personal passwords.

3–5 1B-N-4-21 Model how a device on a network sends a message from one device (sender) to another (receiver)
while following specific rules.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

28
Assessing
Computational
Thinking Skills
There are many ways in which you can monitor and
assess your students’ progress through a WeDo 2.0
project.

This section offers the following tools to help you in

your assessments:

• Documentation pages
• Self-assessment statements
• Anecdotal record grid
• Observation rubrics grid
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Student-Led Assessment
Documentation Pages
Each project will ask students to create documents to summarize their work.
To have a complete science report, it is essential that students:
• Document their work using various types of media
• Document every step of the process
• Take the time to organize and complete their document

It is most likely that the first document your students will complete will not be as
good as the next one. You can support them by:
• Giving feedback and allowing them time to see where and how they can improve
some parts of their document.
• Allowing them to share their documents with each other. By communicating their
scientific findings, students will be engaged in the work of scientists.

Self-Assessment Statements
After each project, students should reflect on the work they have done. Use the
following page to encourage reflection and set goals for the next project.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

30
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Student Self-Assessment Rubric

Name: Class: Project:

Directions: Circle the brick that shows how well you did. The bigger brick, the better you did.

I defined the question or problem.

I built a LEGO® model and programmed a solution.

I tested my solution and made improvements.

I documented and shared my ideas.

Project Reflection
One thing I did really well was:

One thing I want to improve on for next time is:

©2016 The LEGO Group.

31
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Teacher-Led Assessment
Developing students’ science, engineering, and computational thinking skills
requires time and feedback. Just as in the design cycle, in which students
should understand that failure is part of the process, assessment should provide
feedback  in terms of what students did well and where they can improve. Problem-
based learning is not about succeeding or failing. It is about being an active
learner and continually building upon and testing ideas.

Giving feedback to students in order to help them develop their skills can be
done in various ways. At each phase of the WeDo 2.0 projects, we have provided
examples of rubrics that can be used by:

• Observing students’ behavior, reaction, and strategies

• Asking questions about their thought processes

As students often work in groups, you can give feedback both on a team level and
on an individual level.

Anecdotal Record Grid

The anecdotal record grid lets you record any type of observation you believe
is important for each student. Use the template on the next page to provide
feedback to students as needed.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

32
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Anecdotal Record Grid

Name: Class: Project:

1. Emerging 2. Developing 3. Proficient 4. Accomplished

Notes:

©2016 The LEGO Group.

33
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Teacher-Led Assessment
Observation Rubrics Suggestion
Examples of rubrics have been provided for every Guided Project. For every Use the observation rubrics grid on the next page to keep track of your students’
student, or every team, you can use the observation rubrics grid to: progress.
• Evaluate student performance at each step of the process
• Provide constructive feedback to help the student progress

The observation rubrics provided in the Guided Projects can be adapted to fit your
needs. The rubrics are based on these progressive stages:

1. Emerging
The student is at the beginning stages of development in terms of content
knowledge, ability to understand and apply content, and/or demonstration of
coherent thoughts about a given topic.

2. Developing
The student is able to present basic knowledge only (e.g., vocabulary ), and cannot
yet apply content knowledge or demonstrate comprehension of the concepts
being presented.

3. Proficient
The student has concrete levels of comprehension of the content and concepts
and can adequately demonstrate the topics, content, or concepts being taught.
The ability to discuss and apply this knowledge outside the required assignment is
lacking.

4. Accomplished
The student can take concepts and ideas to the next level, apply concepts to
other situations, and synthesize, apply, and extend knowledge to discussions that
include extensions of ideas.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

34
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Observation Rubrics Grid

Class: Project:

NGSS

Explore

Create

Test

Share
Students’ Names

10

11

12

13

14

15

To be used with the rubrics described on the following page: (1) emerging, (2) developing, (3) proficient, (4) accomplished.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

35
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Assessing Project Phases - General Rubrics

You can use these assessment rubrics to give general feedback on a scale of 1 to Share Phase
4 at the end of each phase of a project. During the Share phase, make sure that the student is able to describe their
solution using the right vocabulary and the right level of detail.
Explore Phase 1. The student does not use evidence from his/her findings in connection
In the Explore phase, feedback should relate to whether or not the student is with ideas shared during the presentation and does not follow established
actively involved in the discussion by asking and answering questions, and their guidelines.
level of understanding of the problem. 2. The student uses some evidence from his/her findings, but the justification is
1. The student is unable to provide answers to questions or adequately participate limited. Established guidelines are generally followed but may be lacking in one
in discussions. or more areas.
2. The student is able, with prompting, to provide answers to questions 3. The student provides adequate evidence to justify his/her findings and
or adequately participate in discussions. follows established guidelines for presenting.
3. The student is able to provide adequate answers to questions and participate in 4. The student fully discusses his/her findings and thoroughly utilizes
class discussions. appropriate evidence to justify his/her reasoning while following all established
4. The student is able to extend explanations in class discussions. guidelines.

Test Phase
During the Test phase, make sure that the student works well on a team, justifies
his/her best solution, and uses the information collected in the Explore phase.
1. The student is unable to work well on a team, justify solutions, and use
information collected for further development.
2. The student is able to work on a team, collect and use information with
guidance, or, with help, to justify solutions.
3. The student is able to work on a team and contribute to the team discussions,
justify solutions, and collect and use information about the content.
4. The student can justify and discuss solutions that allow for the collection and
use of information.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

36
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Assessing Computational Thinking Skills

Name: Class:

Decomposition 1. Emerging 2. Developing 3. Proficient 4. Accomplished Notes

Describe the problem in The student is unable to The student is able, with The student is able to The student is able to
your own words. describe the problem in prompting, to describe describe the problem in describe the problem
their own words. the problem in their own their own words. in their own words and
words. starts to decompose
the problem into smaller
parts.

Describe how you will The student is unable The student is able, with The student is able The student is able
know whether or not you to describe success prompting, to describe to describe success to describe success
have found a successful criteria. success criteria. criteria. criteria with a high level
solution to the problem. of detail.

Describe how you can The student is unable to With prompting, the The student is able to The student is able to
break the problem down break down the problem. student is able to break break down the problem break down the problem
into smaller parts. down the problem into into smaller parts. into smaller parts and
smaller parts. can describe the links
between each of the
parts.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

37
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Assessing Computational Thinking Skills

Name: Class:

Generalization 1. Emerging 2. Developing 3. Proficient 4. Accomplished Notes

Describe which program The student is unable to The student is able to The student is able to The student is able to
you have used from describe which program identify which program describe which program describe, in detail, which
the Program Library (or has been used and why. has been used. has been used and why. program has been used
elsewhere) and why. and what modifications
have been made to it.

Observe how your The student is unable With prompting, the The student is able to The student is able to
students recognize to recognize patterns, student is able to recognize patterns, or recognize patterns, or
patterns, or reuse or reuse concepts seen recognize patterns, or reuse concepts seen reuse concepts of their
concepts they have before. reuse concepts seen before. own.
seen before. before.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

38
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Assessing Computational Thinking Skills

Name: Class:

Algorithmic Thinking 1. Emerging 2. Developing 3. Proficient 4. Accomplished Notes

Describe the list of The student is unable to With prompting, the The student is able to The student is able to
actions to program. make a list of actions. student is able to make make a list of actions. make a detailed list of
a list of actions. actions to help them
develop their program.

Describe how you have The student is unable to With prompting, the The student is able to The student is able to
programmed your describe the program. student is able to describe the program. describe the program,
solution. describe the program. providing extensive
details about each
component.

Describe the The student in unable With prompting, The student is able The student in able to
programming principles to describe the the student in able to describe the describe, with extensive
used in your solution programming principles to describe the programming principles comprehension, the
( e.g., output, inputs, used in their solution. programming principles used in their solution. programming principles
events, loops, etc.).  used in their solution. used in their solution.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

39
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Assessing Computational Thinking Skills

Name: Class:

Evaluation 1. Emerging 2. Developing 3. Proficient 4. Accomplished Notes

Describe what happened The student cannot With prompting, the student The student is able to The student is able to
when you executed your describe what happened. is able to describe what describe what happened, describe what happened,
program, and whether or not happened, and compare it and compare it to what was compare it to what was
it was what you expected. to what was expected. expected. expected, and is already
finding solutions.

Describe how you have The student cannot With prompting, the student The student can describe The student can describe,
fixed the problems in your describe how they have can describe how they have how they have fixed the in extensive detail, how they
program. fixed the problems. fixed the problems. problems. have fixed the problems.

Describe how your solution The student is unable to With prompting, the student The student is able to The student is able to
is linked to the problem. describe how their solution is able to describe how describe how thier solution describe, in extensive detail,
is linked to the problem. their solution is linked to the is linked to the problem. how their solution is linked
problem. to the problem.

Describe how you have tried Students is unable to Students is able, with Students is able to describe Students is able to describe
new ways of solving the describe other ways he has prompting, to describe other other ways he has tried other ways he has tried
problems along the project tried along the project. ways he has tried along the along the project. along the project and is
project. able to describe why each
options has not been
considered.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

40
 Assess with WeDo 2.0

Assessing Computational Thinking Skills

Name: Class:

Abstraction 1. Emerging 2. Developing 3. Proficient 4. Accomplished Notes

Describe the most The student is not With prompting, the The student is able to The student is able to
important part of your able to describe their student is able to describe their solution. describe their solution,
solution. solution. describe their solution. focusing on the most
important part of the
solution.

Describe the most The student is not able With prompting, the The student is able to The student is able
important details of your to provide any details student is able to discuss details of their to discuss the most
solution. about their solution. provide details about solution, but some of the important details of their
their solution. details are not essential. solution.

Describe how your Their student is unable With prompting, the The student is able The student is able
solution met the initial to describe how their student is able to to describe how their to describe, with
criteria. solution met the initial describe how their solution met the initial extraordinary clarity, how
criteria. solution met the initial criteria. their solution met the
criteria. initial criteria.

©2016 The LEGO Group.

41
 LEGO Education WeDo 2.0 ®

LEGOeducation.com

LEGO and the LEGO logo are trademarks of the/sont des marques
de commerce du/son marcas registradas de LEGO Group.
©2017 The LEGO Group. 2017.01.01. - V.1.