Local Checks 1
Local Checks 1
Teaching
Perry S. Green, Ph.D.
This connection design tool kit for students is based on the failure. Connections are always designed as planar, two-
original steel sculpture designed by Duane S. Ellifritt, P.E., dimensional elements, even though they have definite three-
Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering at the Uni- dimensional behavior. Students who have never been
versity of Florida. The tool kit includes this teaching guide, around construction sites to see steel being erected have a
a 3D CAD file of the steel sculpture, and a shear connection difficult time visualizing this three-dimensional character.
calculator tool. The teaching guide contains drawings and Try explaining to a student the behavior of a shop-welded,
photographs of each connection depicted on the steel sculp- field-bolted double-angle shear connection, where the out-
ture, the CAD file is a 3D AutoCAD® model of the steel standing legs are made purposely to flex under load and
sculpture with complete dimensions and details, and the cal- approximate a true pinned connection. Textbooks generally
culator tool is a series of MathCAD® worksheets that show orthogonal views of such connections, but still many
enables the user to perform a comprehensive check of all students have trouble in “seeing” the real connection.
required limit states. In the summer of 1985, after seeing the inability of many
The tool kit is intended as a supplement to, not a replace- students to visualize even simple connections, Dr. Ellifritt
ment for, the information and data presented in the Ameri- began to search for a way to make connections more real for
can Institute of Steel Construction’s Manual of Steel them. Field trips were one alternative, but the availability
Construction, Load & Resistance Factor Design, Third Edi- of these is intermittent and with all the problems of liability,
tion, hereafter, referred to as the AISC Manual. The goal of some construction managers are not too anxious to have a
the tool kit is to assist students and educators in both learn- group of students around the jobsite. Thought was given to
ing and teaching basic structural steel connection design by building some scale models of connections and bringing
visualization tools and software application. them into the classroom, but these would be heavy to move
All information and data presented in any and all parts of around and one would have the additional problem storing
the teaching tool kit are for educational purposes only. them all when they were not in use.
Although the steel sculpture depicts numerous connections, The eventual solution was to create a steel sculpture that
it is by no means all-inclusive. There are many ways to would be an attractive addition to the public art already on
connect structural steel members together. campus, something that would symbolize engineering in
In teaching engineering students in an introductory course general, and that could also function as a teaching aid. It
in steel design, often the topic of connections is put off until was completed and erected in October 1986, and is used
the end of the course if covered at all. Then with the crush every semester to show students real connections and real
of all the other pressures leading up to the end of the semes- steel members in full scale.
ter, even these few weeks get squeezed until connections are Since that time, many other universities have requested a
lucky to be addressed for two or three lectures. One reason copy of the plans from the University of Florida and have
for slighting connections in beginning steel design, other built similar structures on their campuses.
than time constraints, is that they are sometimes viewed as
a “detailing problem” best left to the fabricator. Or, the mis-
taken view is taken that connections get standardized, espe-
cially shear connections, so there is little creativity needed
in their design and engineers view it as a poor use of their
time. The AISC Manual has tables and detailing informa-
tion on many standard types of connections, so the process
is simplified to selecting a tabulated connection that will
carry the design load. Many times, the engineer will simply
indicate the load to be transmitted on the design drawings
and the fabricator will select an appropriate connection.
Yet connections are the glue that holds the structure
together and, standardized and routine as many of them may
seem, it is very important for a structural engineer to under-
stand their behavior and design. Historically, most major
structural failures have been due to some kind of connection
Connection design in an introductory steel course is often every connection that is illustrated by the steel sculpture has
difficult to effectively communicate. Time constraints and multiple photos and a data figure. The data figure has tables
priority of certain other topics over connection design also of information and CAD-based illustrations and views.
tend to inhibit sufficient treatment of connection design. Each figure has two tables, the first table lists the applicable
The Steel Connections Teaching tool kit is an attempt to limit states for the particular connection, and the second
effectively incorporate the fundamentals of steel connection table provides a list of notes that are informative statements
design into a first course in steel design. The tool kit or address issues about the connection. The views typically
addresses three broad issues that arise when teaching stu- include a large isometric view that highlights the particular
dents steel connection design: visualization, load paths, and location of the connection relative to the steel sculpture as
limit states. well as a few orthogonal elevations of the connection itself.
In structural analysis classes, students are shown ideal- In addition to the simple views of the connections provided
ized structures. Simple lines represent beams and columns, in the figures, also included are fully detailed and dimen-
while pins, hinges, and fixed supports characterize connec- sioned drawings. These views were produced from the full
tions. However, real structures are composed of beams, 3D CAD model developed from the original, manually
girders, and columns, all joined together through bolting or drafted shop drawings of the steel sculpture.
welding of plates and angles. It is no wonder that students The guide covers the most common types of steel con-
have trouble visualizing and understanding the true three- nections used in practice, however more emphasis has been
dimensional nature of connections! placed on shear connections. There are more shear connec-
The steel sculpture provides a convenient means by tions on the steel sculpture than all other types combined.
which full-scale steel connections may be shown to stu- In addition to the shear connection descriptions, drawings,
dents. The steel sculpture exhibits over 20 different connec- and photos, MathCAD® worksheets are used to present
tions commonly used in steel construction today. It is an some design and analysis examples of the shear connections
exceptional teaching instrument to illustrate structural steel found on the steel sculpture.
connections. The steel sculpture’s merit is nationally recog- The illustrations, photos, and particularly the detail draw-
nized as more than 90 university campuses now have a steel ings that are in the teaching guide tend to aid visualization
sculpture modeled after Dr. Ellifritt’s original design. by students. However, the 3D CAD model is the primary
In addition to the steel sculpture, this booklet provides means by which the student can learn to properly visualize
illustrations, and each connection has a short description connections. The 3D model has been developed in the com-
associated with it. monly used AutoCAD “dwg” format. The model can be
The steel sculpture and the booklet “show” steel connec- loaded in AutoCAD or any Autodesk or other compatible
tions, but both are qualitative in nature. The steel sculpture’s 3D visualization application. The student can rotate, pan
connections are simply illustrative examples. The connec- and zoom to a view of preference.
tions on the steel sculpture were not designed to satisfy any The issue of limit states and load paths as they apply to
particular strength or serviceability limit state of the AISC steel connections is addressed by the illustrations and narra-
Specification. Also, the narratives in the guide give only tive text in the guide. To facilitate a more inclusive under-
cursory descriptions, with limited practical engineering standing of shear connections, a series of MathCAD®
information. worksheets has been developed to perform complete analy-
The main goals of this Guide are to address the issues of sis for six different types of shear connections. As an analy-
visualization, load paths, and limit states associated with sis application, the worksheets require load and the
steel connections. The guide is intended to be a teaching connection properties as input. Returned as output are two
tool and supplement the AISC Manual of Steel Construction tables. The first table lists potential limit states and returns
LRFD 3rd Edition. It is intended to demonstrate to the stu- either the strength of the connection based on a particular
dent the intricacies of analysis and design for steel connec- limit state or “NA” denoting the limit state is not applicable
tions. to that connection type. The second table lists connection
Chapters in this guide are arranged based on the types of specific and general design checks and returns the condition
connections. Each connection is described discussing vari- “OK” meaning a satisfactory value, “NA” meaning the
ous issues and concerns regarding the design, erectability, check is not applicable to that connection type, or a phrase
and performance of the specific connection. Furthermore, describing the reason for an unsatisfactory check (e.g.
Photographs
Patrick Veltri
Perry S. Green, Ph.D.
As a structure, the steel sculpture consists of 25 steel mem- the lower, heavier section is a W12×170. Each shaft of the
bers, 43 connection elements, over 26 weld groups, and column has four faces (two flanges and two sides of the
more than 144 individual bolts. As a piece of art, the steel web) and each face is labeled according to its orientation
sculpture is an innovative aesthetic composition of multi- (North, South, East, or West). A major connection is made
form steel members, united by an assortment of steel ele- to each face of the upper and lower shafts. Seven of the
ments demonstrating popular attachment methods. eight faces have a girder-to-column connection while the
At first glance, the arrangement of members and connec- eighth face supports a truss (partial). Two short beams
tions on the steel sculpture may seem complex and unorgan- frame to the web of each girder near their cantilevered end.
ized. However, upon closer inspection it becomes apparent Thus, the steel sculpture does indeed resemble a tree
that the position of the members and connections were “branching” out to lighter and shorter members.
methodically designed to illustrate several specific framing The upper shaft girder-to-column connections and all of
and connection issues. The drawings, photos, and illustra- the beam-to-girder connections are simple shear connec-
tions best describe the position of the members and connec- tions. The simply supported girder-to-column connections
tions on the steel sculpture on subsequent pages. The on the upper shaft are all propped cantilevers of some form.
drawings are based on a 3D model of the sculpture. There The east-end upper girder, (Girder B8)* is supported by the
are four complete elevations of the sculpture followed by pipe column that acts as a compression strut, transferring
thirteen layout drawings showing each connection on the load to the lower girder (Girder B4). A tension rod and cle-
sculpture. Each member and component is fully detailed vis support the upper west girder (Girder B6). The channel
and dimensioned. A bill of material is included for each lay- shaped brace (Beam B5A) spans diagonally across two
out drawing. girders (Girder B5 and Girder B8). This channel is sup-
In general terms, the steel sculpture is a tree-like structure ported by the south girder (Girder B5) and also provides
in both the physical and hierarchical sense. A central col- support for the east girder (Girder B8).
umn, roughly 13 ft tall is comprised of two shafts spliced The enclosed CD contains 18 CAD drawings of the steel
together 7 ft -6in. from the base. Both shafts are W12-series connections sculpture which may serve as a useful graphi-
cross-sections. The upper, lighter section is a W12×106 and cal teaching aid.
ABBREVIATIONS
Structural design is based on the concept that all structural intended function of the member or element under consid-
members are designed for an appropriate level of strength eration.
and stiffness. Strength relates to safety and is essentially the A connection may have many or only a few limit states.
capacity of a structure or member to carry a service or ulti- The controlling limit state can be either strength related or
mate design load. Stiffness is typically associated with ser- based on serviceability criteria. The controlling strength
viceability. Serviceability is concerned with various limit state is the specific condition that has the lowest resist-
performance criteria of a structure or member during serv- ance to the given design load. Initially, most designers tend
ice loading and unloading. to proportion elements based on strength requirements then
For acceptable safety and satisfactory performance of the check that the particular design meets applicable service-
structure, the load and resistance factor design philosophy ability limit states, refining if necessary. The inverse design
uses statistically based load and resistance factors to modify procedure is also acceptable: design for serviceability and
nominal resistance and service loads. Load factors increase then check strength. Regardless of the methodology the
the nominal loads, and resistance factors (also known as φ controlling limit state dictates the optimal design.
factors) reduce the nominal resistance of a member. The The following pages have descriptions and figures that
load factors account for the possibility of higher than antic- explain the general applicability of the more common con-
ipated loads during service. The resistance factors account nection limit states. The applicability of any given limit
for the possibility of lower than anticipate strength. Design state is dependent upon the specific connection geometry
loads and design strengths are obtained when the service and loading. These figures are only a guide and are not
loads and nominal resistance values are multiplied by the meant to represent any and all possible combinations of
appropriate load and resistance factors. limit states.
Structural members must be proportioned with sufficient
design strength to resist the applicable design loads. In
addition to strength, an appropriate stiffness level must be BSR BLOCK SHEAR RUPTURE
provided to satisfy applicable serviceability requirements.
When loads exceed the design strength or serviceability Block shear rupture is a limit state in which the failure path
requirements, a limit state has been reached. A limit state is includes an area subject to shear and an area subject to ten-
the condition where the structure or member is functionally sion. This limit state is so named because the associated
inadequate. Structural elements tend to have several limit failure path tears out a “block” of material. Block shear can
states, some based on strength and others based on service-
ability.
A single connection might include a large number of
structural members and several fastener groups. However,
the basic components of connections are the fastening sys-
tem and the attached plies of material. Thus, strength-based
limit states for connections can be based on either the mate-
rial (members) or the fasteners. Connection strength limit
states of both the fasteners and the plies of material result
from tension, shear, or flexural forces.
Each strength limit state has a particular failure path
across, through or along the element or member. The failure
path is the line along which the material yields or ruptures.
Serviceability limit states typically involve providing an
appropriate amount of stiffness or ductility in a structural Figure 2-1. Block Shear Rupture Limit State
element. The serviceability requirements depend on the (Photo by J.A. Swanson and R. Leon, courtesy of
Georgia Institute of Technology)
BS BOLT SHEAR
BS
Figure 2-2. Bolt Bearing Limit State Figure 2-4. Bolt Tension Fracture Limit State
(Photo by J.A. Swanson and R. Leon, (Photo by J.A. Swanson and R. Leon,
courtesy of Georgia Institute of Technology) courtesy of Georgia Institute of Technology)
CONCENTRATED FORCES
WC WEB CRIPPLING
Figure 2-5. Flange Local Bending Limit State Figure 2-7. Web Local Buckling Limit State
(Beedle, L.S., Christopher, R., 1964) (SAC Project)
PA PRYING ACTION
Figure 2-8 Web Local Yielding Limit State Figure 2-10 Seat Angle Deformation
(SAC Project) (Yang, W.H. et al., 1997)
Figure 2-11. Prying Action Limit State Figure 2-13. Shear Rupture Limit State
(Photo by J.A. Swanson and R. Leon, (Astaneh, A. and Nader, M.N., 1989)
courtesy of Georgia Institute of Technology)
W WELD SHEAR
WHITMORE SECTION
WS
YIELDING / BUCKLING
BSR BB BS
FY WLB
W BT PA
TY TR
BSR BB BS SR SY
Figure 2-17. Shear Connection; Potential Limit States Figure 2-19. Tension Connection
(Hanger Connection Potential Limit States
W FLB
BB BS
W WS
BSR BB BS TR TY
BSR BB BS
SR SY WLY WC WCB
Figure 2-18. Moment Connection; Potential Limit States Figure 2-20. Tension Connection (Gusset Plate);
Potential Limit States
In current construction practice, steel members are joined teria for Bolted and Riveted Joints, (Kulak, Fisher and
by either bolting or welding. When fabricating steel for Struik, 1987).
erection, most connections have the connecting material High strength bolts can be either snug tightened or pre-
attached to one member in the fabrication shop and the other tensioned. When bolts are installed in a snug-tightened con-
member(s) attached in the field during erection. This helps dition the joint is said to be in bearing as the plies of joined
simplify shipping and makes erection faster. Welding that material bear directly on the bolts. This assumes that the
may be required on a connection is preferably performed in shank of the bolt provides load transfer from one ply to the
the more-easily controlled environment of the fabrication next through direct contact. Bearing connections can be
shop. If a connection is bolted on one side and welded on specified with either the threads included (N) or excluded
the other, the welded side will usually be the shop connec- (X) from the shear plane. Allowing threads to be included
tion and the bolted connection will be the field connection. in the shear planes results in a shear strength about 25% less
The use of either bolting or welding has certain advan- than if the threads are specified as excluded from the shear
tages and disadvantages. Bolting requires either the punch- plane(s). However, appropriate care must be taken to spec-
ing or drilling of holes in all the plies of material that are to ify bolt lengths such that the threads are excluded in the as-
be joined. These holes may be a standard size, oversized, built condition if the bolts are indeed specified as threads
short-slotted, or long-slotted depending on the type of con- excluded.
nection. It is not unusual to have one ply of material pre- In pretensioned connections, the bolts act like clamps
pared with a standard hole while another ply of the holding the plies of material together. The clamping force
connection is prepared with a slotted hole. This practice is is due to the pretension in the bolts created by properly
common in buildings having all bolted connections since it tightening of the nuts on the bolts. However, the load trans-
allows for easier and faster erection of the structural fram- fer is still in bearing like for snug-tightened joints.
ing. The initial load transfer is achieved by friction between
Welding will eliminate the need for punching or drilling the faying or contact surfaces of the plies of material being
the plies of material that will make up the connection, how- joined, due to the clamping force of the bolts being normal
ever the labor associated with welding requires a greater to the direction of the load. For slip-critical joints, the bolts
level of skill than installing the bolts. Welding requires a are pretensioned and the faying surfaces are prepared to
highly skilled tradesman who is trained and qualified to achieve a minimum slip resistance. The reliance on friction
make the particular welds called for in a given connection between the plies for load transfer means that the surface
configuration. He or she needs to be trained to make the condition of the parts has an impact on the initial strength of
varying degrees of surface preparation required depending slip-critical connections. The strength of slip-critical con-
on the type of weld specified, the position that is needed to nections is directly proportional to the mean slip coefficient.
properly make the weld, the material thickness of the parts Coatings such as paint and galvanizing tend to reduce the
to be joined, the preheat temperature of the parts (if neces- mean slip coefficient.
sary), and many other variables. The two most common grades of bolts available for struc-
tural steel connections are designated ASTM A325 and
STRUCTURAL BOLTING ASTM A490. The use of A307 bolts is no longer that com-
mon except for the ½-in. diameter size where they are still
Structural bolting was the logical engineering evolution
sometimes used in connections not requiring a pretensioned
from riveting. Riveting became obsolete as the cost of
installation or for low levels of load. A307 bolts have a 60
installed high-strength structural bolts became competitive
ksi minimum tensile strength. A325 and A490 bolts are des-
with the cost associated with the four or five skilled trades-
ignated high-strength bolts. A325 bolts have a 120 ksi min-
men needed for a riveting crew. The Specification for
imum tensile strength and are permitted to be galvanized,
Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts, pub-
while A490 bolts have a 150 ksi minimum tensile strength,
lished by the Research Council on Structural Connections
but are not permitted to be galvanized due to hydrogen
(RCSC, 2000) has been incorporated by reference into the
embrittlement concerns. High strength bolts are available in
AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for
sizes from ½- to 1½-in. diameters in 1/8 in. increments and
Structural Steel Buildings. Many of the bolting standards
can be ordered in lengths from 1½ to 8 inches in ¼ in. incre-
are based on work reported by in the Guide to Design Cri-
ments.
Figure 3-1. Structural Fastener - Bolt, Nut and Washer Figure 3-3. Structural Fastener - Twist-off Bolt
• These double-angles are field bolted to the supporting girder and shop bolted to the
supported beam. This eliminates "knifed" erection. (Lowering the supported beam
web into place between the angles).
• The offset bolt rows between the in-plane and outstanding angle legs provide better
entering and tightening clearances.
• Since both of the members are the same depth, the beam is double coped to
accommodate the flanges of the girder.
Figure 4-2. Shear Connection: All-bolted double-angle Figure 4-3. Shear Connection: All-bolted double angle
Girder B1 / Beam B1B Girder B1 / Beam B1B
• The double-angles are shop welded to the supported beam and field bolted to the
supporting girder.
• The girder web is shared between two double-angle connections. The additional row of
bolts holds the east side connection temporarily in place until the west side connection
can be fitted up.
• The top flanges of both the beam and the girder are at the same elevation. The top
flange of the supported beam is coped to eliminate the interference of girder flange.
• Welds on the supported side are placed along the toe of each angle and optionally along
the top or bottom edges of both angles.
Figure 4-6. Shear Connection: Bolted-welded double-angle Figure 4-9. Shear Connection: Bolted-welded double-angle
Girder B3 / Beam B3A Girder B3 / Beam B3B
Figure 4-7. Shear Connection: Bolted-welded double-angle Figure 4-10. Shear Connection: Bolted-welded double-angle
Girder B3 / Beam B3A Girder B3 / Beam B3B
• The double-angles are shop welded to the supported beam and field bolted to the
supporting girder.
• The girder web is shared between two double-angle connections. The additional row of
bolts holds the east side connection temporarily in place until the west side connection
can be fitted up.
• The top flanges of both the beam and the girder are at the same elevation. The top
flange of the supported beam is coped to eliminate the interference of girder flange.
• Welds on the supported side are placed along the toe of each angle and optionally along
the top or bottom edges of both angles.
• The double-angles are field welded to the supporting girder and shop welded to the
supported beam.
• When connection elements are field welded to members, the area of attachment must be
free of any coatings (i.e. paint) or lubricants (i.e. oil or grease)
• Welds on the supporting member should be placed along the toe and optionally along
the bottom edge of the angle. Properly sized weld returns should be provided at the top
edge of the angle; welding across the entire top edge should be avoided since it would
inhibit the flexibility of the connection.
• Welds on the supported side are placed along the toe of each angle and optionally along
the top or bottom edges of both angles.
• The double-angles are field welded to the supporting girder and shop welded to the
supported beam.
• When connection elements are field welded to members, the area of attachment must be
free of any coatings (i.e. paint) or lubricants (i.e. oil or grease)
• Welds on the supporting member should be placed along the toe and optionally along
the bottom edge of the angle. Properly sized weld returns should be provided at the top
edge of the angle; welding across the entire top edge should be avoided since it would
inhibit the flexibility of the connection.
• Welds on the supported side are placed along the toe of each angle and optionally along
the top or bottom edges of both angles.
• The double-angles have been field welded to the supporting column and shop welded to
the supported girder.
• When connection elements are field welded to members, the area of attachment must be
free of any coatings (i.e. paint) or lubricants (i.e. oil or grease)
• Welds on the supporting member should be placed along the toe and optionally along
the bottom edge of the angle. Properly sized weld returns should be provided at the top
edge of the angle; welding across the entire top edge should be avoided since it would
inhibit the flexibility of the connection.
• Welds on the supported side are placed along the toe of each angle and optionally along
the top or bottom edges of both angles.
Figure 4-16. Shear Connection: All-welded double-angle Figure 4-19. Shear Connection: All-welded double angle
Girder B6 / Beam B8B Column C2 / Girder B8
Figure 4-17. Shear Connection: All-welded double-angle Figure 4-20. Shear Connection: All-welded double-angle
Girder B8 / Beam B8A Column C2 / Girder B8
• The plate is shop welded to the supported beam and field bolted to the supporting
girder.
• Shear end-plate connections require tight fabrication and erection tolerances. For
bolting, the beam may be specified short and shims used to fill the gap.
• Only A36 grade steel should be used for shear end-plate connections.
• The seat angle is field bolted to the supporting column and shop welded to the supported
girder.
• The top angle only provides stability to the supported beam. All shear is assumed to be
carried by the seat angle.
• The attachment of the outstanding angle leg to the bottom flange of the girder is only to
prevent the beam from slipping off the seat.
• The seat provides bearing for the bottom flange of the girder, thus web crippling and
local web yielding limit states must also be considered.
• The seat angle is shop welded to the supporting column and field bolted to the supported
girder.
• The top angle only provides stability to the supported beam. All shear is assumed to be
carried by the seat angle.
• The attachment of the outstanding angle leg to the bottom flange of the girder is only to
prevent the beam from slipping off the seat.
• The seat provides bearing for the bottom flange of the girder, thus web crippling and
local web yielding limit states must also be considered.
Figure 4-28. Shear Connection: Welded unstiffened seat Figure 4-29. Shear Connection: Welded unstiffened seat
Column C2 / Girder B6 Column C2 / Girder B6
• The plate is shop welded to the supporting girder and field bolted to the supported
beam.
• This is a one sided connection. Erection is simplified as the beam can be swung into
place.
• The top flanges of both the beam and the girder are at the same elevation. The top
flange of the supported beam is coped to eliminate the interference of girder flange.
• The weld size should be limited to three-quarters the thickness of the single plate to
ensure that weld strength is not the controlling element in the connection.
Thus, the strength based on bolt shear alone is the same on TEE SHEAR CONNECTION
either ply of the single-angle. For a standard all-bolted sin-
gle-angle connection, there is typically one bolt line on both The tee shear connection is fabricated from a WT section
plies with all the bolts in single shear. Thus, like a double- with the stem connected to the web of the supported mem-
angle, the strength based on bolt shear alone is the same on ber and the flange attached to the supporting member. Both
either ply of the single-angle. the stem and the flange may be either bolted or welded to
Eccentricity should always be considered on the out- the appropriate members.
standing angle leg. Eccentricity should also be considered The required beam setback for a shear tee connection is
on a welded angle leg. If two or more lines of bolts are used greater than that of other connections. The tee has a rolling
on the web of the supported beam, then eccentricity should fillet on each side at the junction of the flange and the stem,
be considered on the in-plane angle leg. which requires a setback distance sufficient enough so as
Like a double-angle connection, the rotational flexibility not to interfere with the rolling fillet. A limited amount of
of the single-angle connection is achieved primarily through rolling fillet encroachment is permitted depending on the
the deformation of the outstanding angle leg. Welds on the size of the rolling fillet of the WT section.
supporting side should be placed along the toe and bottom The theoretical location of the pin (assumed most flexible
edge of the angle. Properly sized weld returns should be part of the connection) will depend on the support and tee
provided at the top edge of the angle; welding across the chosen. The AISC Manual gives guidance for proper design
entire top edge on the supported side should be avoided in this regard.
since it would inhibit the flexibility of the connection. Tees with thick flanges may provide for rotational flexi-
Beams B4A and B4B demonstrate the use of single-angle bility through stem behavior similar to that of a shear tab.
connections on the steel sculpture. The supported members Tees with thicker flanges may provide for rotational flexi-
in each of these connections are channel shapes, which rep- bility through flange behavior similar to that of an end plate
resent typically lightly loaded members used for infill steel or double angle connection. The AISC Manual provides
framing. suitable guidance for all cases.
The single-angle for Beam B4A is shop welded to the Beam B1A shows a tee shear connection. The tee has
girder and field bolted to the beam, while Beam B4B has the been shop welded to the girder and field bolted to the beam.
single-angle field bolted to the girder and shop welded to
the channel.
• This single-angle is field bolted to the supported beam and shop welded to the
supporting girder.
• This is a one sided connection. Erection is simplified as the beam can be swung into
place.
• The supported beam is a channel (C) shape. Channels have tapered flanges similar to
American Standard (S) shapes.
• Welds on the supporting member should be placed along the toe and optionally along
the bottom edge of the angle. Properly sized weld returns should be provided at the top
edge of the angle; welding across the entire top edge should be avoided since it would
inhibit the flexibility of the connection.
• The single-angle is shop welded to the supported beam and field bolted to the supporting
girder.
• This is a one sided connection. Erection is simplified as the beam can be swung into
place.
• The supported beam is a channel (C) shape. Channels have tapered flanges similar to
American Standard (S) shapes.
• Welds on the supported side are placed along the toe of each angle and optionally along
the top or bottom edges of both angles.
Figure 4-36. Shear Connection: Welded-bolted single angle Figure 4-39. Shear Connection: Welded-bolted tee
Girder B4 / Beam B4A Girder B1 / Beam B1A
Figure 4-37. Shear connection: Bolted-welded single-angle Figure 4-40. Shear Connection: Welded-bolted tee
Girder B4 / Beam B4B Girder B1 / Beam B1A
• The tee is shop welded to the supporting girder and field bolted to the supported beam.
• This is considered a flexible support condition since the support of this connection is the
web of the girder.
• This is a one-sided connection. Erection is simplified as the beam can be swung into
place.
• Welds on the supporting member should be placed along the toe and optionally along
the bottom edge of the angle. Properly sized weld returns should be provided at the top
edge of the angle; welding across the entire top edge should be avoided since it would
inhibit the flexibility of the connection.
• To ensure adequate connection flexibility the welds connecting the tee flange to the
supporting member and the thickness of the tee stem are subject to specific size
limitations.
• Setback of the supported beam must extend beyond the k distance of the tee flange.
• Due to the extended setback, eccentricity and tee stem flexure must be considered.
Moment Connections
Moment connections transfer the moment carried by the (transverse stiffeners and web doubler plates) are welded to
flanges of the supported beam to the supporting member. the section to enhance the stiffness. The use of these com-
Moment connections (or continuous or rigid-frame connec- ponents will increase fabrication costs, so it may be more
tions) are assumed to have little or no relative rotation economical to select a heavier column section or one with
between the supporting member and the supported mem- higher yield strength.
bers. A Fully Restrained (FR) connection assumes the
measured angles between intersecting members are main- FLANGE-PLATED CONNECTIONS
tained (i.e. no relative rotation) and there is full transfer of (BEAM-TO-COLUMN)
the moments. Partially Restrained (PR) connections assume
Flange-plated connections are made with top and bottom
that there will be some relative rotational movement that
flange-plates that connect the flanges of the supported beam
occurs between intersecting members, though there will still
to the supporting column. There are several types of flange-
be transfer of the moments.
plated connections. The flange-plates are fillet or groove
Infinite rigidity can never be realistically attained; there-
welded to the supports. The flanges of the supported mem-
fore, even fully restrained moment connections do possess
ber may be either bolted or welded to the plates. Flange-
some minimal amount of rotational flexibility, which is usu-
plates are usually shop attached to the column and field
ally neglected. FR connections are idealized as having full
attached to the flanges of the supported member.
fixity between members.
Flange-plates are usually positioned slightly wider apart
To transfer the tension and compression forces carried by
than the depth of the supporting member if they are to be
the flanges, continuity between the supported beam flanges
bolted to the flanges of the supported member. This arrange-
and the supporting member must be realized. Hence, the
ment makes it easier to erect, providing adequate clearance.
flanges of the supported member are attached to either a
Shims are provided to fill any of the resulting gaps. If the
connection element or directly to the supporting member.
flange-plates are welded to the flanges of the supporting
Most moment connections are made from the supported
member, then the plates are designed and detailed such that
beam to either the flange or the web of column members
flange plate welding can be performed in the flat position.
(called beam-to-column connections). Beam splices to
This can be accomplished by using a flange-plate that is
transfer moments are also common. Moment connections
slightly narrower than the beam flange on top and a flange-
also normally include a simple shear connection at the web
plate that is slightly wider than the beam flange on the bot-
of the supported member to carry the shear component of
tom. This arrangement permits flat-position (down-hand)
the beam reaction. Any load eccentricity considerations in
welding.
the shear connection as part of a moment connection may be
If the beam frames into the web of a column, the plates
ignored as it is carried by the moment connection. If a
should be sized wide enough to fill the space within the col-
moment connection is made to the web of a column, the
umn flanges, but narrowing outside the column to allow
connection elements may be extended so that field welds
downhand welding. In this case the top plate will likely be
and/or bolts can be located outside of the column flanges for
wider than the top flange of the supported beam. Thus, to
easier erectability.
accommodate the flat welding position of flange plates
Columns in beam-to-column connections are subjected to
attached to column webs, the top flange plate should be
concentrated forces from the flanges of the supported mem-
blocked to make an easier joint for welding to the supported
ber. In some instances the column section may have insuf-
member. Regardless of the bolting or welding arrange-
ficient local strength at the location of these concentrated
ments, if the connection is made to the web of a column, the
forces. In such circumstances, a heavier column section or
supported side attachment should provide enough space to
a higher strength column may be substituted, or transverse
accommodate bolting or welding access (i.e. extending
column stiffeners and/or web doubler plates may be
plates past the column flanges). See the AISC Manual for
installed.
discussion of corner clips and plate configurations when
Transverse stiffeners are plates fabricated to fit between
attaching to column webs.
the flanges of the column at the point(s) of concentrated
Girders B2 and B4 are bolted and welded flange plate
loading (tension or compression). Web doubler plates are
connections to the web of Column C1, respectively. The
steel plates that are fabricated to increase the overall thick-
flange-plates for Girder B2 are bolted to the top and bottom
ness of the web of a section. Both types of components
flanges of the beam. As mentioned above, the flange-plates
• These flange-plates are shop welded to the supporting column and field bolted to the
supported girder.
• The moment connection is made to the web of Column C1. The flange-plates are cut to
fill the space between the column flanges.
• The corners of the flange-plate are clipped to eliminate the possibility of creating a
stress concentration at the re-entrant corner of the web-flange junction. No weld is
provided at these locations.
• The plates attached to the flanges of the girder are for transfer of the moment forces.
• The plate attached to the web of the girder is for transfer of the shear force.
• For all FR and PR column connections, column stiffening must be investigated to ensure
that the connection flange forces do not exceed applicable limit states.
Figure 5-3. Moment Connection: Bolted flange plates Figure 5-5. Moment Connection: Welded flange plates
Column C1 / Girder B2 Column C1 / Girder B4
• The flange-plates are shop welded to the supporting column and field welded to the
supported girder.
• The moment connection is made to the web of Column C1. The flange-plates are cut to
fill the space between the column flanges.
• When connection elements are field welded to members, the area of attachment must be
free of any coatings (i.e. paint) or lubricants (i.e. oil or grease)
• The plates attached to the flanges of the girder are for transfer of the moment forces.
• The plate attached to the web of the girder is for transfer of the shear force.
• For all FR and PR column connections, column stiffening must be investigated to ensure
that the connection flange forces do not exceed applicable limit states.
Figure 5-7. Moment Connection: Directly welded flanges. Figure 5-8. Moment Connection: Directly welded flanges.
Column C1 / Girder B1 Column C1 / Girder B1
• A transverse stiffener is attached between the flanges of the support column. The plate
is aligned to receive the concentrated force (tension or compression) from the girder
flange. For all FR and PR Column Connections, column stiffening should be
investigated to ensure that the connection flange forces do not exceed applicable limit
states.
• Weld access holes are cut in the supported girder to accommodate welding in the flat
position and to relieve thermal stresses.
• The plate attached to the web of the girder is designed for shear transfer.
• When connection elements are field welded to members, the area of attachment must be
free of any coatings (i.e. paint) or lubricants (i.e. oil or grease)
Figure 5-10. Moment Connection: Extended end-plate. Figure 5-12. Moment Connection: All-bolted moment splice.
Column C1 / Girder B3. Girder B3 / Girder B3
Figure 5-11. Moment Connection: Extended end-plate. Figure 5-13. Moment Connection: All-bolted moment splice.
Column C1 / Girder B3. Girder B3 / Girder B3
• A transverse stiffener is attached between the flanges of the support column. The plate
is aligned to receive the concentrated force (tension or compression) from the girder
flange. For all FR and PR Column Connections, column stiffening must be investigated
to ensure that the connection flange forces do not exceed applicable limit states.
• Extended end-plates are classified based on the number of bolts at the tension flange and
may be used with or without stiffeners.
• Based on current research, only A36 grade steel should be used for the extended end-
plate as outlined in Volume II of the AISC-LRFD Manual of Steel Construction.
• If bolting is based on bearing, the bolts must be designed for shear-tension interaction.
If bolting is based on slip-critical conditions, the bolts may be designed for shear only.
• The plates attached to the flanges of the girders are designed for moment transfer.
• The plates attached to the webs of the girders are designed for shear transfer.
• The web plates are subjected to a moment equal to the shear component force times the
distance between the centroids of the fasteners.
Columns are primarily loaded in compression, but may also among several columns. When the force on any single col-
be subject to axial tension, shear, and moment. Therefore, umn is small, the friction on the contact bearing area and/or
the purpose of column connections is to transfer the loads to the flange plates may be sufficient to resist these forces. If
either a supporting member or to the foundation of the struc- the shear force is large, the column splice connection must
ture. be designed to resist these forces and hold all parts securely
When a column is used to transfer loads between a sup- in place. Column splices must also be designed to resist the
ported member and a supporting member, each of these tension forces that may develop due to uplift loads. Regard-
members needs to be checked locally. Stiffeners may be less of the controlling load condition, the splice should be
required to prevent local yielding or buckling from the com- sufficient to hold all parts securely in place. Flange plates,
pression forces being transferred. When the column con- butt plates, or directly welding of flanges may effectively
nection is to a base plate, it is necessary that a suitable splice columns.
bearing area be provided to prevent crushing of the concrete Flange-plated splices involve attaching plates (by bolting
foundation. or welding) to the flanges of the upper and lower shafts.
When two columns being spliced are of different sizes but
COLUMN SPLICE of the same nominal depth, which is a common occurrence,
then shims or filler plates must be used to fill any gaps.
Column splices are used when it is either economical to
Butt plates are used between the ends of the upper and
change column sizes or the height of the structure exceeds
lower shafts of the column splice. Butt plates are conven-
the available column length. Column splices at perimeter
ient when the nominal depths of the upper and lower shafts
locations should preferably be located four feet above a fin-
are significantly different.
ished floor to accommodate attachment of safety cables,
Columns may also be spliced by directly welding the
which may be required at floor edges or openings and to
flanges of the upper and lower shafts. The webs of the
ease erection. The upper and lower shafts of the column do
columns should be attached by welding or by installing
not necessarily need to be in full bearing contact with one
plates. The plates may be either bolted or welded to the
another. A gap up to 1/16 in. is permitted without the need for
upper or lower shaft.
repair or shimming. If the gap is between 1/16 and ¼ in. then
The steel sculpture uses one joint to illustrate two differ-
non-tapered steel shims are required. Engineering evalua-
ent column splices. Column C1 (the lower shaft) is spliced
tion should be performed on gaps larger than ¼ in.
to Column C2 (the upper shaft) by direct welding the
In most column splices, the bearing area between the
flanges on the north side and using a welded-bolted flange
columns will be sufficient to transfer the compression load.
plate on the south side. This would never be done in prac-
In addition, lateral (shear) forces are typically distributed
Figure 6-1. Column Connection: Column splice Figure 6-2. Column Connection: Column splice
Column C1 / Column C2 Column C1 / Column C2
Figure 6-5. Column Connection: Base plate Figure 6-8. Column Connection: Base plate (bracing column)
Foundation / Column C1 Girder B4 / Column C3 / Girder B8
Figure 6-6. Column Connection: Base Plate Figure 6-9. Column Connection: Base Plate
Foundation / Column C1 (bracing column)
Girder B4 / Column C3 / Girder B8
• The column base plate provides suitable bearing area to prevent crushing of the
concrete foundation.
• The base plate on the steel sculpture has two different arrangements on one connection.
This particular layout is for illustration only. In practice, one form of stiffening or the
other would be utilized on both flanges of the column.
NORTH FACE:
The north side attachment of the base plate is a moment connection. This
design uses vertical plate stiffeners with a welded top angle. There is a small gap
between the bottom edge of the stiffeners and the base plate. This gap avoids having
to fit the stiffener to bear directly against the base-plate. The top angle provides a
bearing surface for the anchor rods and a means to level the column.
SOUTH FACE:
The south side attachment of the base plate is a moment connection. This
design uses a single triangular plate stiffener welded between the top of the base
plate and the southern face of the column flange. Although the triangular stiffener
tends to reduce bending, the primary purpose is to provide additional material to
increase the weld length and thus the shear strength of the base plate.
• The bracing column is bolted to the top flange of Girder B4 and the bottom flange of
Girder B8.
• The plate is shop welded to the supporting pipe column and bolted to the supported
girder.
• The pipe column acts as a compression/tension brace for Girder B8. Girder B8 is
cantilevered and simply supported at the column. Girder B6 would be unstable without
the pipe column to transfer the load to rigidly supported Girder B4 below.
• The brace acts primarily in compression, however the connections of the pipe column
should be designed for any shear (i.e. lateral) and/or tension (i.e. uplift) loads.
• Acting in compression, the pipe column delivers a concentrated load to the web of the
lower girder (Girder B4). To manage the localized load from the pipe column, two
different web stiffeners have been added to Girder B4. Each of the web stiffeners is
essentially the same, the difference lies in that south side web stiffener extends
completely from the top flange to the bottom flange of Girder B4. The north side
stiffener is cut short and a gap is provided between the bottom edge of the stiffener and
the bottom flange of the girder. The gap avoids having the stiffener bear directly on the
bottom flange and allows for less restrictive fabrication tolerances. This arrangement is
for illustration only; in practice only one stiffener configuration would be used.
Miscellaneous connections are attachments that cannot be savings in both the brace member and the connection may
characterized by one of the connection categories previ- be possible if the bracing is designed as a tension only mem-
ously discussed. These connections might be specified for ber. The advantage is that the brace member may be slen-
specific types of members such as roof joists or truss mem- der (such as a cable or rod). Stiffeners may be required to
bers. They may also include connections with unusual handle the concentrated forces often associated with axially
framing geometry such as skewed or canted connections. loaded members.
Clevises are mechanical fixtures that are designed to
CLEVISES transfer load from a threaded rod to a transverse pin. The
clevis transfers tension from the threaded rod into double
Bracing members are typically used to add stiffness and/or
shear on the pin. The pin is secured through a hole in a plate
stability to a structure. Most braces are axially loaded com-
that is joined to the appropriate steel member.
pression or tension members. Rarely will a bracing mem-
There are many sizes of clevises available to take an
ber need to transfer shear or flexure. Substantial material
assortment of different rod and pin sizes. The clevises are
Figure 7-1. Misc. Connection: Clevis, plate & rod Figure 7-3. Misc. Connection: Clevis, plate & rod.
Column C2 / Girder B6 Column C2 / Girder B6
Figure 7-2. Misc. Connection: Clevis, plate & rod. Figure 7-4. Misc. Connection: Clevis, plate & rod.
Column C2 / Girder B6. Column C2 / Girder B6.
• Column C2 supports Girder B6 with a #3 clevis and 13/8 inch diameter rod.
• The rod acts as a support for the girder. The girder is simply supported at the column.
Without the tension rod attached to the end, Girder B6 would be unstable.
• The pin that attaches the clevis to the plate is in double shear.
• A tapered washer and is used in conjunction with a nut to attach the rod to the column
web.
• Strengths (and dimensions and weights) for different size clevises are given in the
Manual of Steel Construction.
Figure 7-6. Misc. Connection: Bolted-welded bent-plate. Figure 7-8. Misc. Connection: Welded joist
Girder B5 / Beam B5A Girder B5 / Joists B9A & B9B
Figure 7-7. Misc. Connection: Bolted-welded bent-plate. Figure 7-9. Misc. Connection: Welded joist.
Girder B5 / Beam B5A Girder B5 / Joists B9A & B9B
• The plate is field bolted to the girder and shop welded to the beam/brace.
• Girder B5 is simply supported at the column. Without the brace attached to the end,
Girder B5 would be unstable.
• Skew connections may be furnished with bent double-angles (for small skew angles) or
bent plate(s) (for large skew angles).
South Elevation
Notes
TRUSS CONNECTIONS
Trusses are typically used as a roof framing system or in
bridge applications. Members are loaded either in tension,
compression, or bending and may be welded together, or
bolted or welded together using gusset plates. Gusset plates
provide the extra area necessary for welding or bolting. If
the connections are bolted and the truss is for a bridge appli-
cation, then the moving load causes stress reversal in the
members and slip-critical joints must be used. When sev-
eral truss members frame together, the line of action for the
force should preferably meet at a common work point. Gus-
set plates must be sized for buckling under compression,
tension yielding, tension rupture, block shear rupture and
Whitmore section buckling and yielding.
On the steel sculpture Truss B7 is framed into the north Figure 7-14. Misc Connections: Shear studs.
Girder B1 / Shear Studs
face of Column C2 using gusset plates.
Notes
• Z purlins have point symmetry and have a tendency to rollover on inclined slopes (such
as those attached to a roof truss). To prevent the Z purlins from rolling over, the upper
flange should be installed in facing up slope.
• Consult American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) "Cold Formed Steel Design Manual"
for connection design requirements and specifications.
Notes
• Girder B1 has several headed shear studs welded to the top flange.
• The studs transfer horizontal shear force between a concrete slab and a steel beam.
With the shear studs embedded in the concrete, the slab and the steel girder act as a
composite member.
• Consult section I5 of the AISC Specification for shear stud design requirements and
specifications.
Figure 7-17. Misc. Connection: Truss Figure 7-18. Misc Connection: Truss
Column C2 / Truss B7 Column C2 / Truss B7
• Column C2 supports Truss B7 by gusset plates welded to the column and bolted to the
truss. All-welded gusset plate connections join the interior members of the truss.
• The support gussets have been shop welded to the supporting column and field bolted to
the supported truss.
• Trusses assembled with unequal leg double-angle struts should have the long legs back
to back.
The importance of proper connection design cannot be drastically affect the strength and/or performance of the
overstated. Connection design requires satisfying several, connections. In general, connections have many limit
sometimes conflicting, design requirements thereby making states, many of which are based on relatively complex
them less tolerant to changes in design parameters. Slight behavior, which need to be considered.
adjustments in the design parameters of connections may
Setback Beam setback in inches Shortest dis- dcb Depth of bottom cope in inches Enter 0
tance from face of support to the web of for no bottom cope. Copes must be
supported beam Fy_… Yield strength of deeper than the flange thickness.
particular member in ksi. Fu_… Ulti-
mate strength of particular member in
c Length of cope(s) in inches Both top and
ksi.
bottom copes must be the same length.
Hole_… Hole type for a given ply of material: Bolt Shear Bolt shear limit state for sides of the con-
Standard (STD), Oversized (OVS), nection that are bolted.
Short-slotted/load transverse (SSLT),
Short-slotted/load parallel (SSLP),
Long-slotted/load transverse (LSLT), or Bolt Bearing Bolt bearing limit state for sides of the
Long-slotted/load parallel (LSLP) connection that are bolted.
Limitations
Although the worksheets are versatile, some limitations do
exist:
MANUALS & SPECIFICATIONS Galambos, T. V., Lin, F. J., and Johnston, B. G., (1996),
Basic Steel Design with LRFD, Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper
American Institute of Steel Construction, Manual of Steel
Saddle River, New Jersey.
Construction, Load & Resistance Factor Design, 3rd Ed.
Chicago: AISC, 2001.
Gaylord, E. H., Gaylord, C. N. Jr., and Stallmeyer, J. E.,
(1992), Design of Steel Structures, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill,
American Institute of Steel Construction, Connecting
Inc., New York.
Steel Members, A Teaching Guide, University of Florida
Publication Services, Undated.
Geschwindner, L. F., Disque, R. O., and Bjorhovde, R.,
(1994), Load and Resistance Factor Design of Steel Struc-
American Institute of Steel Construction, Engineering for
tures, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Steel Construction, Chicago: AISC, 1984.
Kulak, G. L., Fisher, J. W., and Struik, J. H. A., (1987)
American Institute of Steel Construction, Hollow Struc-
Design Criteria for Bolted and Riveted Joints, John Wiley &
tural Sections Connections Manual, Chicago: AISC, 1997.
Sons, Inc., New York.
American Welding Society, D1.1:2000 Structural Weld-
MacGinley, T. J., (1997), Steel Structures: Practical
ing Code - Steel, Miami: AWS, 2000.
Design Studies, E. & F.N. SPON, London.
Research Council on Structural Connections, Specifica-
McCormac, J. C., (1997), Structural Steel Design: LRFD
tion for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts,
Method, HarperCollins.
Chicago: AISC, 2000.
Salmon, C. G., and Johnson, J.E., (1996), Steel Struc-
STEEL TEXTBOOKS
tures: Design and Behavior, 4th Ed., HarperCollins.
Burns, T., (1995), Structural Steel Design: LRFD, Delmar
Publishers, Inc., New York. Segui, W. T., (1999), LRFD Steel Design, 2nd Ed., PWS
Publishing, Pacific Grove, California.
Brockenbrough, R. L. and Merritt, F. S., (1994), Struc-
tural Steel Designer’s Handbook, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, Smith, J. C., (1996), Structural Steel Design: LRFD
New York. Approach, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Bruneau, M., Uang, C. M., and Whittaker, A., (1998), Spiegel, L. and Limbrunner, G. F. (2002), Applied Struc-
Ductile Design of Steel Structures, McGraw-Hill, New tural Steel Design, 4th Ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle
York. River, New Jersey.
Chen, W. F. and Kim, E., (1997) LRFD Steel Design Tamboli, A. R., Editor (1997), Steel Design Handbook –
Using Advanced Analysis, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton. LRFD Method, McGraw Hill, New York.
Carter, C. J., and Geschwindner, L. F., (1993), “The Eco- Popov, E. P., and Tsai, K. C., (1989), “Performance of
nomic Impact of Overspecifying Simple Connections.” Large Seismic Steel Moment Connections Under Cyclic
Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 34-36. Loads.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 51-
60.
Easterling, W. S., Gibbings, D. R., and Murray, T. M.,
(1993), “Strength of Shear Studs in Steel Deck on Compos- Scacco, M. N., (1992), “Design Aid: Anchor Bolt Interac-
ite Beams and Joists.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. 30, tion of Shear and Tension Loads.” Engineering Journal,
No. 2, pp. 44-55. AISC, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 137-140.
Ellifritt, D. S. and Sputo, T., (1999), “Design Criteria for Thornton, W. A., (1992), “Strength and Serviceability of
Stiffened Seated Connections to Column Webs.” Engineer- Hanger Connections.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. 29,
ing Journal, AISC, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 160-168. No. 4, pp. 145-149.
Engelhardt, M. D., Winneberger, T., Zekany, A. J., Thornton, W. A., (1995), “Connections: Art, Science, and
Potyraj, T. J., (1998), “Experimental Investigation of Dog- Information in the Quest for Economy and Safety.” Engi-
bone Moment Connections.” Engineering Journal, AISC, neering Journal, AISC, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 132-144.
Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 128-139.
Thornton, W. A., (1996), “The Effect of Eccentricity on
Epstein, H. I., (1992), “An Experimental Study of Block Brace-to-Gusset Angles.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol.
Shear Failure of Angles in Tension.” Engineering Journal, 33, No. 4, pp. 123-128.
AISC, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 75-84.
Zwerneman, F. J. and Saleh, Y., (1996), “The Effect of
Epstein, H. I., (1996), “Block Shear of Structural Tees in Burrs on the Shear Capacity of Bearing Connections.” Engi-
Tension- Alternate Paths.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. neering Journal, AISC, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 3-6.
33, No. 4, pp. 147-152.
SINGLE-PLATE CONNECTIONS
Iwankiw, N. R., (1987), “Design for Eccentric and
Astaneh, A., Call, S. M. and McMullin, K. M., (1989),
Inclined Loads on Bolt and Weld Groups.” Engineering
“Design of Single-plate Shear Connections.” Engineering
Journal, AISC, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 164-171.
Journal, AISC, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 21-32.
Kishi, N., Chen, W. F., Goto, Y., Matsuoaka, K.G.,
TEE SHEAR CONNECTIONS
(1993), “Design Aid of Semi-rigid Connections for Frame
Analysis.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. Astaneh, A., and Nader, M. N., (1989), “Design of Tee
90-107. Framing Shear Connections.” Engineering Journal, AISC,
Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 9-20.
Kulak, G. L., and Green, D. L., (1990), “Design of Con-
nectors in Web-Flange Beam or Girder Splices.” Engineer- Thornton, W. A., (1996), “A Rational Approach to Design
ing Journal, AISC, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 41-48. of Tee Shear Connections.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol.
33, No. 1, pp. 34-37.
Mander, J. B., Chen, S. S., and Gokhan, P., (1994), Bruneau, M. and Mahin, S. A., (1991), “Full-Scale Tests
“Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Semi Rigid Top-and-Seat of Butt-Welded Splices in Heavy-Rolled Steel Sections
Angle Connections.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. 31, Subjected to Primary Tensile Stresses.” Engineering Jour-
No. 3, pp. 111-122. nal, AISC, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 1-17.
Mander, J. B., Gokhan, P., and Chen, S. S., (1995), “Low- Carter, C. J., Tide, R. H. R., and Yura, J. A., (1997),
Cycle Variable Amplitude Fatigue Modeling of Top-and- “Rational Basis for Increased Fillet Weld Strength.” Engi-
Seat Angle Connections.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. neering Journal, AISC, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 75-81.
32, No. 2, pp. 54-62.
Gross, J. M., James, G. O., and Ziemian, R. D., (1995),
Roeder, C. W., and Dailey, R. H., (1989), “The Results of “Block Shear Tests in High-Strength Steel Angles.” Engi-
Experiments on Seated Beam Connections.” Engineering neering Journal, AISC, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 117-122.
Journal, AISC, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 90-95.
Iwankiw, N. R., (1997), “Rational Basis for Increased Fil-
Yang, W. H., Chen, W. F., and Bowman, M. D., (1997), let Weld Strength.” Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. 34, No.
“The Behavior and Load-Carrying Capacity of Unstiffened 2, pp. 68-71.
Seated-Beam Connections.” Engineering Journal, AISC,
Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 89-103. Discussion by Carter, C. J., Rex, C. O., and Easterling, W. S., (1995), “Partially
Thornton, W. A., and Murray, T. M., Engineering Journal, Restrained Composite Beam-To-Girder Connections.”
AISC, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 151-156. Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 145-157.