Pambayang Kolehiyo NG Mauban: College of Education The Contemporary World
Pambayang Kolehiyo NG Mauban: College of Education The Contemporary World
College of Education
The Contemporary World
Name:
_________________________________________________________
Section:_______________________________________________________
_
Instructor : _____________________________________________________
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
2
A world of regions
and banking hubs. Singapore developed its harbor facilities and made them a
first-class transit port for ships carrying different commodities from Africa,
Europe, the Middle East, and mainland Southeast Asia to countries in the
Asia-Pacific. In the most cases, however, countries from a regional alliance
for - as the saying goes- there is strength in numbers.
Countries from regional associations for several reasons. One is for military
defense. The most widely known defense grouping is the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) formed during the Cold War when several Western
European countries plus the United States agreed to protect Europe against
the threat of the Soviet Union . The Soviet Union responded by creating its
regional alliance, the Warsaw Pact, consisting of the Eastern European
countries under soviet domination. The Soviet Union imploded in December
1991, but NATO remains in place.
Countries also form regional organizations to pool their resources, get better
returns for their exports, as well as expand their leverage against trading
partners. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) was
established in 1960 by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela to
regulate the production and sale of oil. This regional alliances flexed it’s
muscles in the 1970s when it’s member countries took over domestic
production and dictated crude oil prices in the world market. In a world highly
dependent on oil, this integration became a source of immense power.
OPEC’s success convinced nine other oil-producing countries to join it.
Moreover, there are countries that form regional blocs to protect their
interdependence from the pressures of superpower politics. The Presidents of
Egypt, Ghana, India, Indonesia, and Yugoslavia created the Non-Aligned
Movement (NAM) in 1961 to pursue world peace and international
cooperation, human rights, national sovereignty, racial and national equality,
non-intervention, and peaceful conflict resolution. It called itself non-aligned
because the association refused to side with either the First World capitalist
democracies in Western Europe and North America or the communist states
in Eastern Europe. At its peak, the NAM had 120 member countries. The
movement, however, was never formalized and continues to exist up to the
present, although it lacks the same fervor that it had in the past.
Finally, economy crisis compels countries to come together. The Thai
economy collapsed in 1996 after foreign currency speculators and troubled
international banks demanded that the Thai government pay back its loans. A
rapid withdrawal of foreign investments bankrupted the economy. This crisis
began to spread to other Asian countries as their currencies were also
devalued and foreign investment left in a hurry. The IMF tried to reverse the
crisis, but it was only after the ASEAN countries along with China, Japan, and
South Korea agreed to establish an emergency fund to anticipate a crisis that
the Asian economies stabilized.
The crisis made ASEAN more “unified and coordinated.” The association has
come along way since it was formed as a coalition of countries which were
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
4
Non-state Regionalism
It is not only states that agree to work together in the name of a single cause
(or causes). Communities also engage in regional organizing. This “new
regionalism” varies in form; the can be “tiny associations that include no more
than a few actors and focus on a single issue, or huge continental unions that
address a multitude of common problems from territorial defense to food
security.” Organizations representing this “new regionalism likewise rely on
the power of individuals, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and
associations link up with one another in pursuit of a particular goal (or goals).
Finally, “new regionalism “is identified with reformists who share the same
“values, norms, institutions, and system that exists outside the traditional,
established mainstream institutions and systems.”
Their strategies and tactics likewise vary. Some organizations partner with
governments (“legitimizers “) participate in “institutional mechanisms that
afford some civil society groups voice and influence [in] technocratic policy-
making processes.” For example, the ASEAN issued its Human Rights
Declaration in 2009, but the regional body left it to member countries to apply
rights are limited in many ASEAN countries, “ new regionalism” organizations
used this official declaration to pressure these governments to pass laws and
regulations that protect and promote human rights.
NGOs and trade unions “committed to protect[ing] and promot[ing] the rights
and welfare of migrant workers.”
These organizations’ primary power lies in the moral standing and their ability
to combine lobbying with pressure politics. Unfortunately, most of them are
poorly financed, which places them at a disadvantage when dealing with their
official counterparts who have large state funds. Their impact in global politics,
therefore limited.
Another challenge for new regionalists is the discord that may emerge among
them. For example, disagreements surface over issues like gender and
religion, with pro-choice NGO’s breaking from religious civil society groups
that side with the Church, Muslim imams, or governments opposed to
reproductive rights and other pro-women policies. Moreover, while civil society
groups are able to dialogue with governments, the latter may not be
welcoming to this new trend and set up one obstacle after another. Migrant
Forum Asia and its ally, the Coordination of Action Research on AIDS
(CARAM), lobbied ASEAN governments to defend migrant labor rights. Their
program of action, however, slowed down once countries like Malaysia,
Singapore, and Thailand refused to recognize the rights of undocumented
migrant workers and rights of the families of migrants.
CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS
This introduces the learners on how to analyze
the dynamics of transnational cooperation and how
governments are affected by globalization. This section
also enables the learners to look into the meaning of
global governance through the discussion of the United
Nations’ (UN) roles and functions.
OBJECTIVES:
At the end of this module, the learners are expected to:
1. Define and explain the meaning of state, nation and nation – states ;
2. Explain the various impacts of globalization on nation – states ;
3. Enumerate and explain the functions of intergovernmental organizations;
4. Identify the roles and functions of the United Nations (UN); and
5. Define and differentiate the concept internationalism from globalism
DIAGNOSTICS:
Instructions: Write AGREE if you think the statement is correct; otherwise,
DISAGREE.
_________ 1. The Human Rights Watch is an international advocacy
organization.
_________ 2. Internationalism and internationalization are two similar ideas.
_________ 3. The Asia Pacific Economic Forum is an intergovernmental
organization (IGO).
_________ 4. The United Nations is a global government.
_________ 5. UN’s fiver permanent security council members have a veto
power.
Globalization has, in a way, reshaped the role and functions of nation – states
as
governing bodies in their particular territories.
First, globalization is seen to impose a forced choice upon nation – states.
Either they
conform to the neo – liberal ideas and free – market principles of deregulation,
privatization, and
free trade or run the risk of being left behind in terms of development. Of
course, the nation –
states, in this contemporary age, are forced to submit themselves to the
demands of globally
accepted free – market principles. Though government policies can be put in
place, nation –
states are forced to realign their policies to be congruent with the principles of
free trade because
of the pressures from global corporations. To illustrate, the member states of
the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), including the Philippines, established the
ASEAN Free
Trade Area (AFTA) in 1999. Its goal is to encourage the member – states to
deepen their
commitments in investment, trade, and industrial collaboration to brace them
for the increase in
the region’s economic activity.
Second, is the establishment of economic and political integrations. One good
example is
the European Union (EU) and the North America Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA). EU has
become a supranational body with 28 members. It has a single currency and
monetary system
among 17 states, parliament with legislative powers, with common citizens’
right to live, work,
vote and run for office, with developed collective mechanism to resolve crises
and assist those in
need, and with intercontinental jurisprudence in the case of the European
Court of Justice and the
European court of Human Rights. The statehood of the members is not
dissolved, what has
changed is only how nation – states function, in terms of economy and
politics, as part of a
whole (Schattle, 2014).
The third effect of globalization is the establishment of international laws and
principles.
This is observable in the establishment of the UN that operates as a forum for
nation – states to
air their differences and try to resolve them. The UN Security Council has
powers that include
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
10
Name
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
Date Established
1967
Members
10 – state members
Objectives
1. Accelerate economic, social and cultural growth and development;
2. Promote regional progression;
3. Advance peace and sustainability;
4. Promote active and beneficial cooperation and mutual assistance in
economic, technical, cultural, administrative and scientific fields;
5. Provide assistance to each other in the framework of training and research
installations in the educational, professional, technical, and administrative
spheres;
6. work hand in hand for more effective and greater use of agriculture and
industries;
7. advance Southeast Asian research; and
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
12
Date established
January 1, 1995
Members
164 – member states
Objectives
The sole IGO that caters to rules of trade on a global scale. It aims:
1. To ensure that trade runs as smoothly, predictably, and freely as possible;
2. To encourage trade by lowering trade barriers that may hinder how
products and services flow from nation to nation.
Name
Organization OF Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
Date established
September 10 – 14, 1960
Members
13 Member Countries
Objectives
To coordinate and unify the petroleum policies of its Member Countries and
ensure the stabilization of oil markets in order to secure an efficient, economic
and regular supply of petroleum to consumers, a steady income to producers
and a fair return on capital for those investing in the petroleum industry.
(opec.org)
The intensification of relations among nation – states gave birth to the idea of
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
13
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
ASIAN REGIONALISM
This section investigates the mechanism of how Asian region integrates and
how nation –
states approach the challenges of world homogenization and division.
OBJECTIVES:
At the end of this module, the learners are expected to:
1. Differentiate between regionalization and globalization;
2. Identify the factors that lead to a greater integration of Asian regions; and
3. Analyze how different Asian states confront the challenges of globalization
and
regionalization through regionalism.
DIAGNOSTICS:
Instructions: Write AGREE if you think the statement is correct; otherwise,
DISAGREE.
_________ 1. Russia is a part of Asia.
_________ 2. Lebanon is in Asia.
_________ 3. East Timor is the youngest state in Asia.
_________ 4. The term Asia was coined by Asians themselves.
_________ 5. Japan colonized
some parts of Asia.
Among all
the continents, Asia
has the biggest
population of at least
two – thirds of the
world’s inhabitants –
with China being a
home of more than
1.4 billion people
based on the 2018
population projection of the United Nations which makes it country as one of
the economic super giants of the world. Asia is most probably one of the
biggest because the continent comprises one – third of the world’s land mass.
In terms of economy, emerging and developing Asian countries and the
Associations of Southeast Asian Nations 5 or the ASEAN 5 (Indonesia,
Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, and Thailand) had
an average of 6.3% and 5.1% GDP growth, respectively, compared to the
world average growth
of 3.5% as of 2016 (Obiols, 2017). In 2016, China was the world’s leading
exporter of goods
valued at $1.99 trillion, followed by the United States with $1.45 trillion
(Dillinger, 2018).
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
20
Since the European Union is in its mature state of regionalism, the world is
now focused
on Asia. Most countries want to have collaborations with East Asian countries
and the
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) members because
economic and political
growths in these regions have started to shape up. As a result, the United
States strategically
takes care of its allies in Asia to maintain and further enhance its supply of
raw materials, human
technological skills, and even its military force. At the same time, Europe
keeps its strong relationship with Asian countries to expand its growing
business in the field of medical science
and research. It cannot be denied that Asia is gaining worldwide attention.
In this light, globalization, regionalization, and regionalism are compared.
Also,
exposures to the different factors that bring about better homogenization of
Asia and how
member – states collectively and separately address the challenges they are
facing are discussed.
The terms regionalization and globalization are both related to integration.
However,
while globalization refers to the expansion and intensification of social
relations and
consciousness across world – time and world – space; regionalization, on the
other hand, is the
“growth of societal integration within a region and to the often undirected
process of social and
economic interaction” (Hurrel, 1995). In terms of scope, it is clear that
globalization happens
around the world while regionalization happens only in a specific geographical
region. Social
and economic reciprocal actions of regionalization are undirected because of
diversity – which
comes in different levels of development (from the rich Singapore to the poor
Laos), politics
(from democracy to dictatorship and everything in between), economics (from
free markets to
capitalism and more), and religion (Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Christianity,
and more) (Richter
& West, 2014).
Another concept commonly confused with regionalization is regionalism.
Regionalism
refers to regional concentration of economic flows and also pertains to the
process of
intergovernmental collaborations between two or more states (Eliassen &
Arnadottir, 2012),
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
21
that is more focused on Asia and the Pacific as a reaction to global economic
integration.
Asian nations work in the form of loans, grants, and information sharing on
topics such as terrorism and regional security.
The establishment of the ASEAN is also another initial reaction to
globalization. It
fosters the spirit of regionalism and oneness of Asian nations. As a group, it
sets out in the
ASEAN Declaration the following aims and purposes:
1. To accelerate economic growth, social progress, and cultural development
in the
region;
2. To promote regional peace and stability;
3. To promote active collaboration and mutual assistance on matters of
common interest;
4. To provide assistance to each other in the form of training and research
facilities;
5. To collaborate more effectively for the greater utilization of their agriculture
and
industries;
6. To expand trade, improve their transportation and communications
facilities, and raise
the living standards of the people;
7. To promote Southeast Asian Studies; and
8. To maintain close and beneficial cooperation.
More so, Asian countries respond to globalization as a small group by doing
bilateral or
multilateral agreements. For example, Philippines has standing bilateral
agreements with China in trade, defense, infrastructure, transnational crimes,
tourism, education, health, and many
others.
Reaction to globalization (and the West) also gave rise to terror groups, like
the Islamic
State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) which has spread to the Muslim communities in
Southern
Philippines, Indonesia, and Malaysia. To combat global terrorism, these
countries made use of
their available resources to minimize and ultimately stop the effects of civilian
– victims such as
displacement and suffering. More so, they reached military multilateral
agreements to address
this common problem. In 2017, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Malaysia had
a trilateral security
meeting wherein they agreed that they need to conduct joint navy patrols
within their boundaries
to prevent he entry and exit of the terror group (Antiporta, 2017).
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
24
in that they are instantaneous, globally accessible, fast and efficient ways of
passing on news and
information. New media has also created an almost virtual world. There are
online games in which a
person will be creating an avatar which serves as the person’s ‘alter ego’
living in a virtual world, offers
an escape from the reality (Mehraj, et al., 2014).
Through the process of digitization, interactions from individuals from all over
the world is
possible and thus results in the integration of cultures. Pieterse (2004) asserts
that the only outcomes of
the influence of globalization on culture are cultural differentialism, cultural
convergence, and cultural
hybridity.
Cultural differentialism views cultural difference as immutable. As the West
and non – Western
civilizations interact or are brought in contract through globalization, clash of
civilizations such as that of
the West and Islam logically follows.
Cultural convergence suggests that globalization engenders a growing
sameness of cultures.
However, the culture of powerful and progressive countries becomes culture.
Example is the Korean Pop
Culture. Some Filipino adolescents prefer to style themselves like their South
Korean idols. Most of them
have also joined different fan clubs as to show their admiration and support of
their Korean idols.
Cultural hybridity suggests that globalization spawns an increasing and
ongoing mixing of
cultures. An example of this is the Chabacano, a Spanish – based creole
language of the Zamboanga City
and of some hybridity in language prompted by the merging of two cultures.
This trend will further bring
about new cultural forms, not only in language but also in food, fashion, arts,
music, among others.
These outcomes set the dynamics between local and global cultural
production. Glocalization,
coined from globalization and localization, is a rather new concept brought
about by the increased
frequency of contact among cultures. This reinforces the fact that local
cultures are not weak, static, or
fixed; they are built and understood new each day in a globalized world (Lule,
2014). Local cultures
continue to accommodate and assimilate cultures of the world due to
globalization.
All in all, the five stages of development of media have greatly influenced the
globalization of
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
29
As you can see in the table above, it is evident that the presence of global
culture may cause
erosion to local cultures. Basically, what happens is that a culture loses many
of its fundamental
elements because of the arrival of a new one. When such changes, happen
there are always positive or
negative effects. Positive effects may include the improvement of the way
things are being done or being
thought off, doing away with obsolete and inefficient practices, or clearer
understanding of things that we
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
33
experience. Negative consequences may be that things that are already good
and working may be replaced
with something worse, being efficient but not effective, or being confused on
how things really work.
On a more material level, this means that new jobs will be available, but those
working on old
ones will be unemployed; and it is not a simple manner to learn new things
when you are used to doing
other ones. Consumers can have new choices on what products to buy, but
this is not a guarantee that the new ones are better overall. The influx of new
products would also mean that old ones will be disposed of even if they are
still working perfectly fine, which means that it generates more waste than
necessary. Big businesses may flourish, but smaller scale ones would suffer;
this benefits the rich more than it does the poor. These are things that happen
when global culture causes erosion of local ones.
Mauban town in Quezon province recently celebrated the Maubanog Festival,
showcasing its rich history and cultural heritage centered on the Christian faith
and its buri palm weaving industry.
Maubanog is from the town’s name and the word “bangog,” meaning “high
spirit.”
First held in 2000, the weeklong event, which is an expanded town fiesta
celebration supported by the National Commission for Culture and the Arts
(NCCA), featured trade
The
same holds true of Bacolod’s MassKara, Davao’s
Kadayawan, Iloilo’s Dinagyang, Baguio’s Panagbenga or Cebu’s Sinulog. The
religious components and
community camaraderie are being overshadowed by the encroachment of
telecommunications companies,
fast food chains, celebrity appearances, band concerts and broadcast
networks that attract droves of
visitors to flock into these communities, with the effect of making these
festivals look and feel more
and more similar with one another year after year. The authentic differences
between them are slowly being felt less and less every year they are
celebrated. This is what the erosion of local culture looks and
feels like, and this happens because of the forces of global culture are slowly
exerting its dominance.
Things like these can be averted. Local and indigenous cultures can serve as
pockets of resistance
to the steamrolling effects of global cultures. The continuing emergence of
independent art projects (films
and music), do-it-yourself movements, travelogues, blogs and vlogs found
online that promote local
cultural products, and efforts by local government units in the Philippines to
bring local cultural products
to the fore of the market (i.e. Niyogyugan festival) all bring a halt to the
dominance of global culture in
the Philippines. Although the effects may be small and short-lived, through the
support of small
consumers like us, such efforts can be sustained so that the erosion of local
cultures can be averted.
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
35
GLOBALIZATION OF RELIGIOUS
PRACTICES
This section examines how
religious practices are being
affected by the changes brought
about by globalization,
particularly through the realm of
information technology.
The tension between global forces
and traditional religious beliefs and
practices are also given attention and how it contributes to new forms of
religiosity, or its disappearance altogether.
Intended Learning Outcomes
At the end of this section, you are expected to:
1.) explain how globalization affects religious beliefs and practices; and
2.) analyze the changing forms of religiosity in the face of globalization.
As a reference point, etymologically, we could look at religion through the lens
of two Latin words: religio (respect for the sacred) and religare (to bind in the
sense of an obligation). This implies that the word describes a group of people
or an institution that is bound together by a common view on what is good or
sacred. However, the simplest one that encompasses what we want to learn
in this module is that religion is “a collection of cultural belief systems and
worldviews that establishes symbols that relate humanity to spirituality and
moral values.1
” Now, what does this mean exactly? A breakdown of the definition is in order.
It tells us that religion relates to almost all aspects of our way of life (culture)
characterized by what we see as true or not (belief), our fundamental
interpretation of in reality (worldview). Religion does this by having
representations (symbols) that connect humanity to something higher than
ourselves (spirituality) and what is good and worthwhile (moral values).
If that sounds like a lot to take in, well, because it is. The influence of religion
is so vast that it can be observable from our personal lives to our social ones,
from the way we act to how social movements occur, from individual choices
to global events. In the case of us Filipinos, a lot of what we believe and do
are rooted on religious beliefs, and we subscribe to the practices of our
respective religions one way or another. Take Christmas, for example. A lot of
our values and beliefs as Filipinos are highlighted during the season’s
festivities. The belief of sharing and valuing close family ties are reflected
through practices like gatherings, parties, exchanging gifts and the likes. We
partake in and consume things that symbolize sharing our blessings with one
another. That’s why one can say that the Christmas season is the longest
holiday in the Philippines.
Now, where does globalization comes in? According to Brazalote and
Leonardo (2019), there are 4 events where globalization caused the most
changes in religion that we could see nowadays:
1.) Religious Nationalism – After World War II, nationalism was very much
related to religious affiliation, hence to a specific set of beliefs. As an example,
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
37
in the Philippines where most people are Catholics, laws for religious holidays
are legislated and are being observed by most of the populace even though
they do not belong to Roman Catholicism.
2.) Turning of Religion into Public Life – Related to the first item in this list,
religious values
extended out beyond the performance and observance of religious
sacraments into the domain of public affairs. Today, religious institutions can
exert considerable influence on the laws that lawmakers legislate, which
means that the boundary between church and state is adjusting.
3.) Proliferation of Religious Fundamentalism and Extremism – The
digitalization of information and culture helped spread religious
fundamentalism (belief in the prime superiority of religious teachings over
everything and the strict observance on who are the righteous or not) and
extremism (political violence according to the will of a supreme being).
Leaders of such groups legitimize the conflicts they create and battles they
fight using religious texts, much to the loss of innocent life and disruption of
peace in many parts of the world.
4.) Increase of Individual Religiosity – For many who practice such a
religiosity, the confidence on one’s own belief and relationship with a supreme
being is a better alternative to the rigid dogmas that their religious affiliation
observes and calls for. The exposure to different information in a globalized
world hugely contributes to this. Some reasons for individual religiosity are the
dissatisfaction from religious institutions, desire for a more personal search for
salvation, or just disliking to belong to any organization.
Isn’t There Something More Concrete?
Although religion is commonly thought of as something concerned with the
immaterial, the effects of it are very material and observable in nature. As we
can see, the information age in globalization has penetrated religions in an
accelerated rate, which has various impacts in the methods that religions use
to spread their own respective teachings. The proliferation, increased
production and continuous consumption religious teachings and information
can be now seen not only in religious institutions like churches and schools
but also in books and e-books, films, cell phone applications, social media,
websites and many more. In this pandemic, you might have observed that
more and more people “attend” televised masses, download religious texts or
search for gospels online in lieu of personally going to church. There is also a
marked increase of accessing computer and cell phone applications to enable
parishioners to attend mass, worship rites or other religious gatherings. This
means that because religion is a very important facet of our lives, many will
find ways, through globalization, to continue its practice even in the midst of a
pandemic where gatherings are discouraged.
So far, we have talked about how globalization has contributes to continuing
practices that are religious in nature, albeit in new modified forms. They are
very effective indeed, as knowledge propagation and information
dissemination has exponentially improved through information
communications technology. But what about the discontinuity of these same
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
38
very significant, with the greatest effect being on religion because of its
nature. Religion used to bind people as intimate or face-toface communities,
but globalization has turned this configuration of religious phenomenon upside
down. As people move and communicate around the globe, the increased
rate of exchange of ideas through information technology continually creates
changes in many forms of religion. It has positive and negative effects, which
brings forth a lot of confusion. One the one hand, it results into some people
holding on to religion and its more traditional (sometimes extreme) forms. One
the other hand, sometimes it results into people not believing in religion
altogether, or at least having only a personal relationship with his/her supreme
being.
Death rate (or crude death rate): The number of deaths per 1,000 population
in a given year.
Growth rate: The number of persons added to (or subtracted from) a
population in a year due to
natural increase and net migration; expressed as a percentage of the
population at the beginning of
the time period.
Less developed countries: Less developed countries include all countries in
Africa, Asia (excluding
Japan), and Latin America and the Caribbean, and the regions of Melanesia,
Micronesia, and
Polynesia.
Life expectancy: The average number of additional years a person of a given
age could expect to
live if current mortality trends were to continue for the rest of that person’s life.
Most commonly cited
as life expectancy at birth.
More developed countries: More developed countries include all countries in
Europe, North
America, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan.
Mortality: Deaths as a component of population change.
Net migration: The net effect of immigration and emigration on an area’s
population in a given time
period, expressed as an increase or decrease.
Population pyramid: A bar chart, arranged vertically, that shows the
distribution of a population by
age and sex. By convention, the younger ages are at the bottom, with males
on the left and females
on the right.
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
41
fertility” is the number that causes a country’s population to slow down and
eventually stabilize.
Mortality
The effect of mortality on population structures is to reduce the component of
the population in which the mortality occurs. Historically, the most dangerous
ages were infancy and old age (variously reckoned according to
circumstances). In addition, some epidemics of infectious diseases (e.g.
Covid-19) had their highest mortality among young adults, whose immune
systems were presumably insufficiently primed. It is expected that the forecast
bird 'flu epidemic’ will behave similarly. War differentially reduces the
proportion of younger men. The majority of infectious diseases of early
childhood have been reduced by immunization, and improved nutrition and
hygiene have rendered childhood safer. Antibiotics, welfare state, and
improvements in medical, surgical, and palliative care have resulted in great
increases in life expectancy in the developed world, where life expectancy is
now in the middle to upper 70s or lower 80s, and rising every year. The effect
of this is to raise the population in the upper age groups substantially. Women
have higher life expectancy than men wherever they live. The tendency of
people to retire to particular resorts means that in some parts of the South
Coast of England the average (arithmetic mean) age of the population is only
just below retirement age.
The down side of this is that the extended lives are often lived in bad health,
as the treatments people receive may keep them alive but do little to
ameliorate the underlying pain or disability brought on by the diseases, and
virtually nothing for the various forms of senile dementia that are increasingly
encountered.
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
43
Rubric Assessment:
Organization of ideas (Relevance of ideas presented, well-researched
ideas/ thoughts, good discussion points) 30 points
Intended Learning Outcomes At the end of this section, you are expected to:
1.) become acquainted with the basic concepts in the study of migration;
2.) explain the factors that affect immigration and emigration;
3.) analyze the motivations behind the movement of migrants; and
4.) weigh in on the benefits and detriments of migration in the context of the
OFW phenomenon. In the preceding topic, you have been already introduced
to the basics of the first two areas of demography: mortality and fertility. While
this topic doesn’t have that much direct on why and how people die or are
being born, it does have significant effects on the quality of life of a given
population. Simply put, migration is the movement of people across a
specified boundary for the purpose of establishing a new or semi-permanent
residence (Bogue 1969). Moreover, when migration happens as an inflow of
people into a country, it is called immigration, while migration happening as an
outflow from a country is emigration. For example, you decided to leave the
Philippines to live and work in the United Kingdom. From the perspective of
someone in the Philippines (your home country), you are an emigrant to the
UK. Conversely, from the perspective of someone in the UK (your destination
country), you are an immigrant to their country. From this example, we can
see that any immigrant is an emigrant at the same time, viceversa.
To further familiarize ourselves with the basic concepts in the study of
migration, here are some key terms to remember from the International
Organization for Migration2 :
1. Country of destination - a country where a migrant is going to; this may also
be called a receiving country.
2. Country of origin – a country of nationality or of former habitual residence of
a person or group of persons who have migrated abroad.
3. Integration – The two-way process of mutual adaptation between migrants
and the societies in which they live, whereby migrants are incorporated into
the social, economic, cultural and political life of the receiving community.
4. International migration – The movement of persons away from their place
of usual residence and across an international border to a country of which
they are not nationals.
Simply put, push factors are characteristics that make it difficult or impossible
to live in countries of origin, whereas pull factors are conditions that make
living in destination countries a more attractive place to live2 . Some
examples of the former are political corruption, poverty, violence, gender
inequality, inaccessibility of healthcare, substandard education, and climate
change; while some examples of the latter are better economic opportunities,
supportive institutions, possibility of family reunification, better healthcare,
quality education and gender equity. We may look at push and pull factors as
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
47
The figures above show us the age-sex structure of the population of the
Philippines and that of
one of the top destinations for Filipino migrants: Canada. If you would look at
any world map,
you’d know that the Philippines is a very small country compared to Canada,
and yet our
population size is almost triple than that of theirs! Aside from the fact that
lower-income
countries like ours are overpopulated, the largest section of our population
(40%) is very young
(0-19 years old); almost all are below the legal working age. In comparison,
Canada’s largest
sections of the population, around 50%, are definitely of working age (25-34
and 55-59 years
old). This translates into a strong and healthy working group as the majority of
population; one
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
49
or friends at home and abroad also help the migrant in his/her decision-
making, migration
expenses, job seeking, place to stay abroad, how to adjust to a new culture
overseas to
make the integration process smoother, allocation of both financial and social
remittances and many more (Haug 2008).
The above list is just the fundamental motivations for movement of migrants.
There are many
more motivations behind their movement and may combine to further motivate
or modify the
migrant’s experiences overseas or upon return. Even though this is a rather
short list, what is
important is for us to know that the main difference of motivations from factors
is that
motivations are more immediately seen, felt and utilized by migrants
compared to the rather
distant macro level factors. In other words, migrants are more aware of
motivations and hence
are more in control of them.
The Philippines has a culture of migration, and it is no surprise that a
considerable number of us
have parents or relatives that are currently overseas to work. It’s also very
probable that some of
us will be OFWs or permanent migrants in another country in the future.
Therefore, it is very
useful for us to be knowledgeable, at least aware, of the factors that influence
immigration/emigration and the motivation or movement of migrants. After
having studied such
topics, we ought to realize that neither factors nor motivations singularly
account for the actions
of a migrant; it is always a combination of the interaction between large scale
factors small scale
motivations. The illustration below serves to simplify this point.
6.C. Benefits and Detriments After looking at the factors that affect emigration
and immigration as well as the motivations for migrants’ movement, we will
now delve into the good things that come out of it, as well as the not-so-good
ones. Like any phenomena in contemporary times, migration can be viewed in
many different angles in order to be able to see its many facets. Also, since
some of you face a possibility of being migrants in the future, you might as
well look at the potential benefits of harms of migration in general and of being
a migrant in particular. This will be viewed through the lens of the OFW
phenomenon later in this section. However, for simplicity’s sake, let us look at
the table below (Nabi 2014; Virupaksha et al. 2014) 4, 5, 6: Issues of
Migration and Migrants Benefits Detriments Economic - Economic growth in
countries of destination from filling up job vacancies and skill gaps - Countries
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
53
Migrants can develop new perspectives and improved doing of things in their
lives - Cultural diversity is developed in countries of destination - Families left
behind are able to experience or consume new things - Social remittances
such as innovations, skills, new ways of thinking, or even development
initiatives in countries of origin - Problems with integration like racism,
prejudice and discrimination - Exploitation, especially of irregular migrants
who are less protected by the law - Care drain as more mothers leave their
children back at home - Erosion of local cultures due to foreign influences in
the form of financial and social remittances Psychological - Possibility for
migrants to improve their skill sets and identity - Resilience in the presence of
foreigners - Migrants may develop new worldviews due to increased contact
with a diverse group of people - Family reunification may improve mental
health due to feelings of belongingness and better community relations upon
return - Role confusion and identity crisis leading to low levels of self-esteem -
Fear and anxiety over xenophobia and discrimination - Feelings of
homesickness or nostalgia - Insecurity or possibility of trauma due to the
needed adjustments to a new life abroad, which may impede integration -
Feelings of estrangement upon return which makes reintegration more difficult
and stressful Although not an exhaustive list, the table above gives us a good
overview on the pros and cons of migration as a phenomenon and the
positive and negative experiences of migrants. For a better learning
experience from which we can relate to, let us now look at the issues of
migration through the lens of the OFW phenomenon. But before we go to
there, let us assess what you have learned so far in this section by completing
the exercise below.
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
54
Exercise 2. Odd One Out: Encircle the one that does not belong to the group
(10 pts).
1.) Improving his/her
children’s lives
Joining one’s spouse to
live in another place
Not being tied to
family life
Taking one’s family
to a wealthier country
2.) Relatives abroad Migrant stocks Friends abroad Being single
3.) Flows of social
remittances
Exploitation of
irregular migrants
Homesickness and
nostalgia
Cultures become more
diverse
4.) New living
arrangements
Education of the
migrant’s children
Decision over who in
the family will leave
Tasking of people left
behind
5.) Stay home Invest in a business Return home Leave to migrate
6.) Improvement of
migration policies
Progress in
international relations
Institutionalization of
migration
Lowering of wages
due to competition
7.) Brain drain Fear of discrimination Development of
resilience
Feelings of
Belongingness
brain drain
Increase of
employment
9.) Social remittances Age Health Retirement
10.) Immediately seen
and felt
Migrants have more
control
Micro-level
phenomena
Macro-level
Phenomena
So, what happens to the fundamental unit of society, the family, when one of
its heads becomes
an OFW? As you may have already thought after reading the texts above and
from what you’ve
heard or personally experienced, it’s not that good.
Let’s focus on the issues of husband-wife relationship first.
1.) Psychological Issues - You
see, one of the fundamental
reasons why people marry is that
they try to achieve the ideal of
being and growing together
physically, emotionally,
psychologically and spiritually for
the rest of their lives. Labor
migration disrupts this
arrangement and results in the
emergence of psychological issues
that could plague their marriage. We must always keep in mind that
separation driven by
the need to work abroad is ALWAYS a painful decision for both husband and
wife.
1.) Marital Infidelity Issues – One of the cornerstones of a married relationship
is intimacy,
and labor migration makes this very difficult to sustain because the husband
and wife are
physically apart. Being left alone is the most common reason for marital
infidelity, which
is quite common among spouses of migrant workers (Santamaria 1992).
2.) Gender Role Issues –When the husband leaves, the wife takes most of
her husband’s
roles in their household; when the wife leaves, the husband tries to assume
most of his
wife’s roles in the family. Pretty neat, right? Well, not really, since the wife has
originally
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
56
more roles in their household compared to the husband. This means that the
man of the
house usually finds it more difficult to assume the role of a mother compared
to when his
wife assumes the role of a father. In doing so, the “ideal houseband” needs to
face
challenges to his and his community’s concept of manhood aside from the
workload in
the house (Añonuevo and Añonuevo 2002). This, when not handled well, can
cause
unbearable strain not only on their marriage but their whole family.
Now, let’s talk about the problems of parent-child relationship.
1.) Psychological strain on parents and children – When a parent leaves as a
migrant,
he/she has already considered the trade-off between economic well-being
and family
proximity. This becomes a source of anxiety and guilt for parents and children
because
they long for each other’s presence, especially if it is the mother who leaves
(OharaHirano 2000). On the one hand, parents may feel anxious of their
children’s safety back
home, or if they are providing them enough, but at the same time feel guilty of
leaving
them behind. On the other hand, children may feel anxious of their parents
return while
at the same time feel guilty about such negative emotions because their
parents leaving is
just for their family’s sake.
2.) Caregiving arrangements - The 3 main forms of care in parenting are
moral care,
emotional care and material care. Migration disrupts and rearranges these
forms in the
common household (Parrenas 2003). When a parent migrates, he/she is
usually forced to
just focus on material care (sending money and products from abroad). This
results into a
few issues like the following:
a. Incomplete involvement of left-behind husbands if the wife is the migrant;
rarely
happens when the wife is the one left behind.
b. Proxy caretakers in the form of relatives
or sometimes, trusted friends. Degrees
of strictness may vary, so feelings of
discontent may appear in the children
which may cause bad behavior.
c. Other people taking care of the children
left-behind may disrupt the values that
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
57
OVERPOPULATION
In this lesson, learners will understand the
important concepts and factors that lead to overpopulation
and overconsumption of our natural resources. Family
size and poverty will be tackled and several things will be
taken into account on how population growth causes
poverty.
OBJECTIVES:
At the end of this lesson, the learners are expected to:
1. Identify what overpopulation is all about ;
2. Explain the impacts of overpopulation to overconsumption ;
3. Understand the relationship between population and resources;
4. Define terms and factors that leads to overpopulation; and
5. Understand the effects of overpopulation to family and poverty and vice-
versa.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POPULATION AND RESOURCES
Current idea on the population question starts
with Thomas Malthus, one of the known English
economic analysts, whose Essay on the Principle of
Population was first distributed in 1798. In it, Malthus
broadly affirmed that the number of population in a given
nation develops at a geometric rate while food flexibly
grows just numerically; hence, in the long run, the
methods for resource would arrive at a characteristic
cutoff and the outcome would be, unavoidably,
deficiencies, hunger, starvation, and epidemics. Indeed,
even in typical occasions, growth in population depressed
wages and extended the hopelessness of the common
laborers, driving Malthus to contend that the Poor Laws
of England and different types of monetary help for the
poor just animated widespread population growth and
postponed inescapable crisis. For several years, Malthus'
ideas were utilized to legitimize conservative class
interests, the genetic counseling development, and hard
supreme reactions to hunger and starvation (Bashford,
2014; Davis, 2001). However, Malthusianism was likewise snared with battles
for women's right to
reproduction, driven by women's activists, for example, Emma Goldman, who
broadcasted that the
common laborers could accomplish its own liberation through 'conscious
procreation', and Margaret
Sanger, the one who founded the Planned Parenthood (Connelly, 2008;
Masjuan and Martinez-Alier,
2004).
In the twentieth century, the supposed neo-Malthusians adjusted Malthus'
demographic
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
63
determinism to warn of the depletion of land and natural resources, not simply
the food supply. Popular
books, for example, William Vogt's The Road to Survival and Fairfield
Osborn's Our Plundered Planet
(both from 1948) mixed feelings of dread that uncontrolled population growth
and industrialization were
carrying the Earth to the furthest reaches of its 'carrying capacity' (Robertson,
2012).
After Ehrlich, population growth turned into a point of convergence in
deliberate investigations of
the reasons for ecological degradation (predominantly in economics and
sociology). Ehrlich assisted with
building up the IPAT equation, where: This equation is naturally identified with
the idea of 'biological impression', which introduced an
accounting strategy to evaluate the effects of consumption beyond natural
borders. Taking all things
together, this impacts the accounting research has demonstrated that rising
consumption in nations with
moderately high pay and low population growth (primarily, the Global North),
has broad natural impacts
in developing countries (the Global South) since, for instance, “the footprint of
the typical American is
nearly 25 times greater than that of the typical Bangladeshi” (York et al., 2003,
p. 295). In any case, later
“changes in patterns of consumption have blurred this binary distinction
between rich and poor societies”
(Rosa et al., 2015, p. 37).
OUR POPULATION HAS BECOME SO LARGE THAT THE EARTH
CANNOT COPE
Currently, there are more than
7,800,000,000 people on planet Earth.
It took until the early of the 19th
century for the world population to reach
one billion. Now we add a billion every 12-
15 years.
THE EARTH CANNOT PROVIDE FOR US ALL AND THE NATURAL
WORLD IS PAYING
THE PRICE
Biodiversity loss, climate change, world pollution, deforestation, water and
food deficiency these
are totally exacerbated by our enormous and ever-expanding numbers. Our
impact on nature is a result of
our consumption and our population. We should address both.
Household Population, Number of Households, and Average Household Size
of the Philippines
The household population of the Philippines reached about 100.57 million
people in 2015. This is
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
64
8.48 million higher than the 92.10 million family unit population detailed in
2010, and 24.24 million
more than the 76.33 million household population posted in 2000. The
household population included
99.6 percent of the complete Philippine population, while the remaining 0.4
percent is contained the
institutional population or those dwelling in aggregate or institutional living
quarters, for example,
hospitals, orphanages, and military camps; and Filipinos in Philippine
embassies, consulates, and
missions outside the country.
Number of households increased by 2.80 million from 20.17 million in 2010 to
22.98 million in 2015
The total number of households in the country in 2015 was recorded at
22.98 million, higher by
2.80 million compared with 20.17 million in 2010 and by 7.70 million
compared with 15.28
million in 2000. See Table B and Figure 2.
Among the country’s administrative 18 regions, Region IV-A
(CALABARZON) had the most
number of households with 3.40 million, followed by the National Capital
Region (NCR) with
3.10 million and Region III (Central Luzon) with 2.57 million.
Average household size was 4.4 persons in 2015
The country’s average household size (AHS) decreased from 4.6 persons
in 2010 to 4.4 persons in
2015. In 2000, there were 5.0 persons, on average, per household.
The Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) registered the
highest AHS of 6.1 persons,
followed by Region V (Bicol) with 4.8 persons. The lowest AHS was recorded
in the NCR and
Region XI (Davao), both with 4.1 persons
Population and Environmentalism
Today, the governmental issues of overpopulation are vexed. Malthusian idea
was an imperative
supporting of an international environmental movement during the 1970s, and
we can see its traces in
'lifeboat ethics,' Spaceship Earth, the 'limits of growth' position, concerns over
desertification, and
different tropes of environmental talk from that period. Nonetheless, at this
point population control is,
best case scenario, a heating issue for most major environmental
organizations (Cafaro, 2015).
Conservatives reject neo-Malthusianism for its anti-growth ethic and coercive
family planning endeavors
while progressives recoil at its racist and neo-colonial suggestions (Hoff and
Robertson, 2016).
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
65
Meanwhile, rates of fertility have generally declined, in the US and around the
globe, likewise collapsing
the desperation of population control. This 'baby bust' or population stagnation
has several implications
for a wide range of issues, from immigration to supporting government
assistance state advantages to
resurgent ethnic patriotism (Robbins and Smith, 2016). Today, there is a wide
agreement, steady with
segment change hypothesis, that mortality-lessening enhancements in
general wellbeing, alongside
neediness decrease and female empowerment, by and large lead toward
lower fertility rate, reducing the
requirement for pressure in reproductive issues.
In studies about environment, the overpopulation question may appear to be
dead, a thing of the
past. But, the question remains, can population and consumption keep on
growing together at current rates
without serious effect on natural resource stocks, biological system
administrations, and worldwide
climate? As Crist and Cafaro (2012, p. 4) outline it, innovation and a generally
unchallenged commitment
to an entrepreneur development worldview have empowered mankind to push
well past the cutoff points
Malthus or Ehrlich anticipated, in the process "turning the entire world in
Resource World"— yet, is this
actually an accomplishment to be praised, or rather, "a dishonorable and
crooked objective"? Maybe it is
the ideal opportunity for a rapprochement among Malthusian and hostile to
Malthusian camps, to manage
the social, natural, and moral difficulties of this Anthropocene period.
Drivers of Population Growth
Agriculture: local agriculture and farming (10,000-6000 BCE), global
agriculture and exchange
of plants, animals, and people between countries (1500-1750).
Public health (1950): reduced death rates among children in poor countries
Improved health care and sanitation (1900s): reduced infectious disease
Drivers of CURRENT increase in population
1. Decreases in mortality among infants
2. Increases in LONGEVITY
a. increasing everywhere except in Southern Africa (due to HIV/AIDS)
b. there is a huge gaps between developed and developing nations
c. birth and death rates are declining worldwide, but as long as fertility is
higher than
mortality rates, population will continue to grow.
d. overall economic development, public healthcare, advancement in food
production and
distribution, water and sanitation have led to dramatic decline in mortality
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
66
• more deep water drilling is necessary, there are 59 years of natural gas left
and 120 years of coal
Carbon Dioxide and Overpopulation
More people = increased CO2 emissions from fossil fuels = climate change;
CO2 dissolves into the ocean
and resulted to:
• forming of carbonic acid
• makes the oceans more polluted and acidic
• ocean acidity has increased by 25% in last 200 years
• higher acidity causes reproductive disorders in marine life
• higher acidity destroys sea weeds and coral reefs
Fresh Water and Overpopulation
The global fresh water crisis is the new oil crisis; water shortage and scarcity
is directly related to:
• overconsumption
• climate change that affects weather pattern
• rainfall changes
What happens when there is water scarcity:
• nutrient loss in our body
• soil degradation due to acidity
• loss of biodiversity and other forms of life
• imbalance and ecological disruption
• health issues like waterborne disease
• loss of food
• natural calamities and disasters
There are up to 8 million deaths per year due to water scarcity.
Controlling Future Population Growth
1. Contraception and Maternal Health Services: increased access to
healthcare services and
contraception for those who want it would have immediate effects on
population control.
2. Feed the Most Vulnerable: better nutrition for pregnant women, breast-
feeding women and
nursing children and infants up to five years of age. It will improve the health
and ability to learn
effects will be observed.
3. Universal Secondary Education: educating all children delays first marriage
and first child,
reduces overall number of children, improves survival of offspring so that
there are fewer
incentives to having more children; effects would be fest in 5 to 25 years.
The S Curve
THE S CURVE: This type of population growth is termed Density-dependent
since growth rate
depends on the numbers present in the population.
1. Population increases slowly initially.
2. Increases rapidly approaching exponential growth rate.
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
68
3. Then declines in a negative acceleration rate until at zero growth rate the
population stabilizes.
BIRTH = DEATH,
MORTALITY = OVERCROWDING & FOOD SUPPLY
- Results from the gradually increasing environmental pressures as population
density increase
J Curve
The J-curve is more dramatic because it frequently results in a population
collapse.
1. Population density increases rapidly exponentially.
2. Stops abruptly as environmental resistance (seasonality) or some other
factor becomes
effective (end of breeding phase)
BEYOND CARRYING CAPACITY
Population growth overshoot the carrying capacity but the environmental
resistance becomes
effective only at the last minute (due to the speed of the population growth)
and population suffer severe
die-backs
Where is the J curve seen in natural populations? The most typical examples
being algal blooms,
some insects (locusts) and lemmings
RENEWABLE RESOURCES
Everybody understands that huge numbers of the Earth's assets are limited.
We are at present
totally dependent on petroleum derivatives, iron and different metals, minerals
and even such
fundamental wares as sand to keep the cutting edge world ticking over.
Including more purchasers makes
those assets run out quicker.
The Earth likewise gives for our necessities inexhaustible assets, for example,
lumber, clean
water and air, healthy soils and wild fish consumed for food. In any case, our
demands are extraordinary
to such an extent that we are currently consuming those assets at 1.7 times
the rate that the Earth can
reestablish them. That rate has expanded consistently since the 1970s and,
except if thing change, we will
require three Earths to supply our necessities by 2050. (Source: Global
Footprint Network)
Few people accept that more prominent efficiencies in the utilization of
resources mean we will
consume less of them. There is no proof to help that, notwithstanding. An
examination by the
Massachussets Institute of Technology in 2017 assessed the consumption of
crude materials, for example,
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
69
raw petroleum and silicon, and found that more prominent efficiencies
prompted cost decreases, making
wares more moderate and, expanding their interest and use. They explored in
excess of 60 materials, and
found that just in six was consumption diminishing.
FOOD AND WATER
More than 800 million individuals right now don't get enough food to meet their
nutritional needs
each day. However, 650 million are obese. Individuals go hungry not on the
grounds that there is lacking
food but since our worldwide economic system distributes it unfairly.
However, every extra mouth to feed puts more pressure on our food supply.
That is already under
threat from multiple factors, including shortage of fresh water, soil depletion,
decimated populations of
insect pollinators and climate change. The UN currently projects that we will
need 70% more food by
2050. Increasing agricultural production comes at a cost to nature, however.
Habitat loss and exploitation
are the two most significant threats to biodiversity - currently 80% of extinction
threats to mammals and
birds are due to agriculture.
A milestone report on diet and sustainability by the EAT-Lancet Commission
in 2019 inferred
that it is conceivable to take care of a population of 10 billion reasonably if
radical move is made to
reform dietary habits and food creation. It went on to say, however:
“ Global population is expected to exceed 11 billion people by 2100 unless
actions are taken to stabilise
population growth. Healthy diets from sustainable food systems are possible
for up to 10 billion people
but become increasingly unlikely past this population threshold.”
Action to address population is essential if we are to meet the most basic
human right of all -
ensuring people have enough to eat.
Water is an absolute fundamental human need, and every individual adds to
demand threats to
fresh water are much more critical. An MIT study said that almost five billion
individuals will live in
water-stressed location by 2050. The United Nations has calculated that water
deficiencies because of
environmental change could dislodge a huge number of individuals by 2030.
Territorial varieties in water
accessibility are extraordinary yet a significant number of the world's least
fortunate locales, and those
which have high population growth, are among those with the briefest
flexibility. Developed nations
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
70
In the developing world, fewer people means less competition for natural
resources, especially
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
71
local resources such as land and fresh water. In the longer term, fewer people
being born means that as
countries move out of poverty, their level of consumption will be lower.
WHAT OUR DIETS AND POPULATION GROWTH MEAN FOR THE
ENVIRONMENT
A new report reveals that global adoption of current food consumption
patterns in G20 countries would
ruin our chance of meeting climate and sustainability targets, exceeding the
planetary boundary for foodrelated emissions by almost three-fold and
requiring up to seven Earths to support.
Diets for a Better Future, published by EAT, demonstrates that even national
dietary guidelines in
almost all G20 countries are incompatible with emissions reduction targets
under the Paris Agreement,
which aims to restrict warming to “well below” 2 °C and ideally 1.5 °C. The
authors emphasis the
importance of a drastic dietary reduction in animal products and that
sustainable, healthy diets will
become impossible if our population exceeds 10 billion people, as is expected
to happen in the latter half
of the century.
THE NEGLECTED FOOD FACTOR
Agriculture already utilizes 40% of the Earth's land area and is the essential
driver of
deforestation, environment annihilation and biodiversity loss. Production of
food is responsible for a
fourth of the world's ozone harming substance outflows, equalling the
contribution made by generating
electricity and surpassing that of industry.
“Global food production is the single largest human pressure on Earth,
threatening local ecosystems,
driving a sixth mass extinction of species, and impacting the stability of the
entire Earth system. Feeding
and producing food for our current population of 7.7 billion people accounts
for approximately 12.5 Gt
CO2eq or 24% of annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.” – Diets for a
Better Future, EAT, 2020
The landmark 2019 EAT-Lancet report concluded that achieving healthy,
systematic and
sustainable diets for 10 billion people by 2050 is possible but it requires
profound transformation to
eating habits and food production. Notably, it mentioned that exceeding this
population threshold will
make this outcome “increasingly unlikely”. However, the UN predicts a
population size close to 11
billion by 2100.
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
72
About 820 million people suffer from starvation and that number has been
rising in recent years
due to progress not keeping up with rapid population growth in the hardest hit
areas. Another 2 billion
and counting are considered obese or overweight due to unhealthy diets,
which are also fuelling
environmental destruction.
The report takes note of that regardless of the enormous effect of food system
on climate change,
biodiversity and health, they have generally been excluded from worldwide
approach plans. It warns that
in the event that we proceed on current food and population trajectories we
won't meet either the Paris
Agreement or the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
FEEDING THE CLIMATE CRISIS
To get an opportunity of restricting warming to 1.5 °C, emissions need to peak
in 2020 and divide
each decade, accomplishing net-zero emanations no later than 2050. To meet
this objective, the EATLancet Commission concluded that emissions from
food can't surpass a yearly carbon spending plan of
5.0 Gigatonnes (Gt) CO2-equivalent.
The report states:
“Current food consumption trajectories and estimated growth of another 2 billion
people on the planet by
2050 will largely exceed food’s maximum allowable “carbon budget”. Behavioral
changes associated
with rising incomes and urbanization are driving a global dietary transition in which
traditional diets are being replaced by more homogenous diets higher in animal source
foods. If this trend is not broken and
reversed, emissions from food production will nearly double by 2050.”
after them. Third, the low per capita household income compels the small
children to involve themselves
in child labor in order to sustain the family which can be very dangerous for a
growing child. Fourth, with
additional child, all the family resources are exhausted in bringing up, with a
result that there is no
savings in the poor family for any unsolicited future needs.
As indicated by Boyd Orr's survey data, birth order and child mortality are
directly related. For
example, a fourth child born to a family will have a more noteworthy possibility
of mortality in the early
age compared with the third child. Consequently this adds to the issue with
enormous family size.
Another downside of having a huge family is that the kids don't get enough
consideration with respect to
nutrients and education. Thus without appropriate development and
instruction, rather than adding to the
prosperity of the family, the kids would not become self-supporting. This
prompts more neediness
bringing about more births and the cycle continues.
Along these lines in a nation like India where the greater part of the population
is significantly
poor, the large family size has become a significant issue in lessening income
gap just as guaranteeing a
better than average way of life to everybody. India isn't confronting the issue
of huge population; it is
battling with the problem of large poor population which isn't even self-
sustaining.
The answer for this can be that the government can boost the large poor
families by increasing
Child Benefit regarding extra child and through different plans which mean to
protect large families. Yet,
this additionally has two significant issues. To start with, it would cost a ton of
cash and consequently
will make a gigantic weight on public exchequer bringing about other financial
problems. Second, this
arrangement can push people to have large families considering the
advantages they are getting.
In this manner the point ought to be to help the current large families just as
awareness among the
poor about family planning through different programs which will in general
confer information with
respect to the burdens of having a huge family. The use of financial motivating
forces or incentives to
empower family planning among the poor is an innovative technique that can
most likely add to control
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
75
family size. Incentives, like giving free food, can be utilized to encourage
appearance of the poor people
at contraceptive educations gatherings, adoption and promotion of
contraceptive methods, sterilization,
and to plan the family. Besides in any program or courses on family planning,
the essential subject should
be fertility awareness since numerous women are not even mindful that they
have a natural pattern of
fertile and infertile periods.
Furthermore, birth control devices should be made free and efforts should be
taken to make them
available and usable to the poor. These efforts have to be taken not only by
the government but also by
the people because the best way to eradicate anything is to prune its roots.
What two factors correlate with HIGH birth rates? POVERTY & LACK of
education
It has long been known that when living standards rise in a community, birth
rates tend to decline
(the "demographic shift")
Where women have had access to media and education, birth rates have
showed significant
Declines- even when income levels had not increased.
The world's poorest countries tend to have the largest family sizes and fertility
rates. When
people have no economic security and cannot rely on their government and a
social safety net, they often
have children to ensure they will be looked after when they are older. Where
child mortality is high, there
is an even greater impetus to have more children. Those circumstances can
lead in turn to a culture which
values high family size.
This understandable human impulse can contribute to a vicious cycle. Poor
families with large
numbers of dependents may perceive the need to take children out of
matriculation early, or marry off
their daughters at earlier age. They will also often live in deprived
communities where there is only
limited access to modern family planning. All these factors combine to keep
family sizes high,
perpetuating the cycle.
What applies to families, applies also to countries. In poorer nations, providing
infrastructure,
jobs, education and health services to a constantly growing population can be
an impossible task. In the
worst cases, even food can be impossible to produce. In countries with very
high population growth, huge
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
76
circumstances, men can often make the decisions for their wives and families,
including whether
or not to use contraception. The result of this, women are often left without
any control over how
many children they’ll end up having.
5. Forced early marriage. Forced early marriage is any marriage where either
person is under 18
and hasn’t given their full consent to be married. It happens for so many
reasons and teenage girls
are the most vulnerable. When a girl is married young, her childbearing years
start much earlier,
meaning among other complications she’s likely to have more kids.
6. Lack of education. Girls who marry and begin their families in adolescent
period are much less
likely to finish school and go on to model educational examples for their
children. They are also
likely to have more children, making it difficult to afford the cost of education
for her every
child. On the other hand, women who go further in their education tend to
have fewer kids. They
often marry later in life and are more likely to prioritize their own children’s
education,
understanding the financial investment it will require.
7. Religious beliefs. In many faiths, children are seen as blessing from
heaven. Religious texts and
scripture can enforce this idea and often act as a strong guiding influence in
people’s lives. When
a life philosophy is anchored in the belief that your offspring will be provided
for and that children are incredible gifts, it stands to reason that couples would
rather have the idea of a large
family.
8. Social reputation. In a community where children are viewed as blessings,
the larger the family
the more blessed you are. In more parts of the Global South, couples without
children are
stigmatized, being discriminated and looked down upon. Big families are
viewed as powerful and
if a woman is unable to bear children, it’s not uncommon for her husband to
abandon her or begin
a family with someone else.
9. Family legacy. Many believed that the desire to preserve lineage, history
and a family name can
feel like a natural, human instinct. It’s not uncommon for parents to be partial
to passing on their
own genetics to continue their family legacy.
10. Limited finances. Families living in poverty, particularly those who make
their living through
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
78
farming may have more children as a way of supporting the family’s livelihood.
Children are
often tasked with chores like walking to collect water, gardening, field work
and animal care,
even when they’re very young. In more dire situations, children may enter the
labour force often
illegally to earn more income for the family’s survival.
11. Care for elders. As children grow up, they are not only carry on their
family’s legacy, but also
the responsibility of providing for and protecting their parents and siblings.
This is especially
important in countries without strong governmental safety nets. In these
cases, having more kids
may provide an extra sense of security for parents, with the added hope that
one day, one or more
children may be successful enough to lift the entire family out of poverty.
POVERTY AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION
While people living in poverty make a minuscule impact on global
environmental problems such
as climate change, they can have a devastating impact on their local
environment. Soils may be eroded in
an attempt to increase crop yields, fish stocks decimated to provide food and
local forests razed for timber
and firewood. These actions, along with increasing conflict between humans
and wildlife and hunting of
animals for food can have a huge impact on biodiversity.
Environmental damage can have wider impacts. For instance, in places where
there is no water
supply and no refuse collection, people are obliged to use and discard plastic
packaging or bottles,
sometimes in waterways, contributing to plastic pollution in the oceans. The
perception that poverty
equates to a low environmental footprint does not hold true in many
circumstances.
SOLUTIONS
The most basic things to do in ending population growth is positive and
simple, and also leads to a better
quality of life for all:
1. Lift people out of poverty
2. Provide universal access to modern family planning and quality education
3. Empower women
4. Encourage and incentivize smaller families
5. If all of these methods are used in combination, they are most effective,
and have secured
dramatic reductions in fertility rates in many countries.
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
79
FRED
Fred's family lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building overlooking
Rizal Park in Manila. There
are six children in Fred's family. His father is a lawyer and his mother is a
dentist, and the family's major
worry is about saving enough money to send the kids to good colleges. There
are over 67,000 people
living in the square mile where Fred's building is located, according to the
PSA census.
MARCIA
Marcia, her two brothers, and her parents live on a farm in Zambales. There
are about five other families
within a mile of their farm. Marcia's parents do not own the farm but rent it
from a local landowner. Even
though last year Marcia's family grew more rice and corns than ever before,
prices paid for their crops
were low. They had to get food stamps to buy enough food for the family.
Answer the following:
1. Whose family is more likely to worry about going without food? Why?
fallen below 8%, the lowest recorded level in human history. For the
first time since the start of the SDGs, the number of people in extreme
poverty in Africa is decreasing. India, once a global hot spot for
poverty, is now on track to end extreme poverty. Children around the
world are living longer and healthier lives. The mortality rate in children
under five has nearly halved over the last twenty years and more
children than ever are receiving an education, getting necessary
vaccinations, and drinking clean water. More people have access to
electricity and nearly three-quarters of the world has essential health
services.
Figure 3 illustrate the account for world extreme poor in 2030. These
bright spots the world is off track to realize the global goals by the end
of this coming decade. On today’s trajectory, nearly half a billion people
will still live in extreme poverty in 2030: 589 million today compared
with 479 million in ten years. The overwhelming majority of those will
be in Africa, affected by a warming planet and unstable societies.
Poverty data for most of Sub-Saharan Africa, for example,
comes from information gathered before the creation of the SDGs five
years ago: a reminder that we urgently need more and better data if we
are even to know for sure how we are doing, and what policies are
working. 3. INEQUALITY AND EXCLUSION IN FOCUS Inequality is at
the heart of many of the gravest issues facing the global community,
including development, climate, and peace. It affects people and
structures across societies and borders and threatens to stymie hard-
fought development gains. What does this mean? A recent United
Nations report shows that 20% of development progress was lost in
recent years due to the unequal distribution of education, health, and
living standards. The World Economic Forum has calculated that it will
take women almost 100 years to reach gender equality. Exclusionary
practices in security, justice, and politics are at the heart of many
violent conflicts today. And it is seen as a key factor in the rise of
protests around the globe, which shows no signs of abating in 2020.
Toppling barriers to opportunity is key to making the transformative
progress needed in 2020. As stressed in the 2019 Human
Development Report, we need to evolve our understanding of
inequality. Just as the SDGs replaced the more basic Millennium
Development Goals, so, too, must we expand our definition of
inequality to address the obstacles to 21st century skills and
opportunities.
progress. On the other hand, there are also many opponents who see
globalization as the
cause of, among other things, increasing income inequality and the
destruction of jobs.
Economic globalization is also seen as one of the factors responsible
for climate change
and environmental issues.
Although it is difficult to calculate the exact climate impact of
globalization, there is
clearly a link between the two as what have been stated earlier. This
negative impact of
globalization on climate is mainly due to increased greenhouse gas
emissions. The main
direct sources of greenhouse gas emissions are power supply,
industrial production and
transport. Even without globalization, these activities would take place.
But the trend
towards globalization in the 20th century and especially in recent
decades has contributed
to its global acceleration. In the first place, globalization gave rise to a
multiplication of
transport networks in the form of road, rail, sea and air transport within
and across
national borders. In addition, growing international trade and
investment have stimulated
global industrial activity.
These developments went hand in hand with an increase in global
greenhouse gas emissions.
Initially, developed regions such as the US and Europe were the main
polluters, but over
time emerging economies such as China have become the main
emitters. After all, an
important part of global production has shifted to these countries,
where, moreover, less
stringent environmental standards often apply.
Economic globalization has led to many positive developments, but its
negative contribution
to the climate problem is undeniable. This does not mean, however
and according to some economists, that globalization and climate
change are incompatible. They claimed that there is no doubt that the
production and transport of goods will have to be done in a more
sustainable way going forward. Agreements at the global level and
monitored compliance are highly needed. From a macroeconomic point
of view, in an ideal world the negative externalities of transport and
production would be eliminated or compensated – likely through pricing
- without undoing the positive effects of international free trade.
However, the means through which such a system, or other options for
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
92
Over the last decade, global food prices had been on the rise and were
especially
exacerbated by the recession in 2008. An extreme example of this
price jump occurred over
a five-month period in 2007 when the prices of corn and wheat
doubled. A number of factors
have lead to the increase in food cost: the growing wealth in places like
China and India
where consumers can pay more food, eat larger meals, and consume
diets that contain more
meat, the high price of oil, fertilizers and pesticides, and an overall
decrease in food
stockpiles.
4) Climate Change
One of the greatest concerns in food security is climate change, which
will continue to put
pressure on the environment. Growing seasons will extend in some
regions (particularly the
mid-to high latitudes i.e. North America, Russia, and Central Asia)
while being reduced in
others due to drought, heat waves, hurricanes, and floods.
5) Changing Technology
A number of innovations in technology have led to changes in food
security. Scientists have
made advancements in agriculture and food production alongside
greater refinement in crop breeding. Improvements in irrigation are
leading to less water waste, and machinery has
replaced animal and human muscle.
In addition to these five factors, Paci-Green and Berardi (2015) further
elaborate on the
negative impacts of food security to also include conflict and natural
hazards:
1. Civil conflict or limited access to food-producing resources,
especially land,
results in food deficits.
2. Natural hazards strike vulnerable populations, whether that is a
broad segment
of a community or, more frequently, its marginalized members.
3. Food quality is compromised, due to either (1) or (2) above, or to
inadequate
quality of food (little fresh produce, poor protein sources, low-nutrient
calories)
and/or reasonably priced retail outlets selling high quality foods. (pg.
686)
The Global Food System
Previous centuries provide examples of a global food system largely
limited to luxury food
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
98
items such as sugar and spices (Sage 2012). More recently, however,
our world is complexly
interconnected through culture, politics, and economies in a process
called globalization.
The scale and intensity of the interconnectivity is unprecedented in
human history, and our
food system is no exception. McDonald defines the global food system
as “complex network
of relations that includes the production, harvest, processing, transport,
and consumption
of food (p. 28). Colin Sage elaborates to describe the primary
components of the global agrifood system: consumers, food retailing
and service, processing and manufacturing, and
primary production (2012, p. 30). The global food system also relies
heavily on transportation
infrastructure that includes travel routes, ports of entry, interstate road
and railroad
networks, and fuel for transportation (Paci-Green and Berardi 2015; p.
689).
The Future of Food Security
Charles Godfrey and others remind us that while we can continue to be
optimistic in
scientific and technological innovation for our global food system, we
must also be cautious
of growing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing water scarcity,
which will pose enormous
challenges to sustainably producing food in the future (2010). In
addition, McDonald argues
that in order to create food security, we must uncouple the global food
system and address
food insecurity at a range of scales. “Individuals and communities can
define problems,
prioritize efforts, increase transparency, and develop solutions” (pgs.
155-156). Education
is key to informing people about their food choices, how their food was
produced, its
nutritional value, and the overall ecological footprint of their food (often
including the
distance it has traveled).
PAMBAYANG KOLEHIYO NG MAUBAN
99