RMS Inlet Pressure Calculation Theory
RMS Inlet Pressure Calculation Theory
The minimum basic parameters that are required to design the piping system include, but are not limited to, the
following.
These basic parameters are needed to design a piping system. Assuming steady-state flow, there are a
number of equations, which are based upon the general energy equation, that can be employed to design the
piping system. The variables associated with the fluid (i.e., liquid, gas, or multiphase) affect the flow. This leads
to the derivation and development of equations that are applicable to a particular fluid. Although piping systems
and pipeline design can get complex, the vast majority of the design problems encountered by the engineer
can be solved by the standard flow equations.
Bernoulli equation
The basic equation developed to represent steady-state fluid flow is the Bernoulli equation which assumes that
total mechanical energy is conserved for steady, incompressible, inviscid, isothermal flow with no heat transfer
or work done. These restrictive conditions can actually be representative of many physical systems.
(Eq. 1)
where
P = pressure, psi,
ρ = density, lbm/ft3,
V = velocity, ft/sec,
and
(Eq. 2)
and
(Eq. 3)
where
HL = head loss, ft,
V = velocity, ft/sec,
ρ = density, lbm/ft3,
and
(Eq. 4)
where
ρ = density, lbm/ft3,
and
μ = viscosity, lbm/ft-sec.
(Eq. 5)
where
μ = viscosity, cp,
and
V = velocity, ft/sec.
(Eq. 6)
where
μ = viscosity, cp,
d = pipe inside diameter, in.,
S = specific gravity of gas at standard conditions relative to air (molecular weight divided by 29),
and
The Moody friction factor, f, expressed in the previous equations, is a function of the Reynolds number and the
roughness of the internal surface of the pipe and is given by Fig. 3. The Moody friction factor is impacted by the
characteristic of the flow in the pipe. For laminar flow, where Re is < 2,000, there is little mixing of the flowing
fluid, and the flow velocity is parabolic; the Moody friction factor is expressed as f = 64/Re. For turbulent flow,
where Re > 4,000, there is complete mixing of the flow, and the flow velocity has a uniform profile; f depends
on Re and the relative roughness (Є/D). The relative roughness is the ratio of absolute roughness, Є, a
measure of surface imperfections to the pipe internal diameter, D. Table 9.1 lists the absolute roughness for
several types of pipe materials.
Table 1
If the viscosity of the liquid is unknown, Fig. 4 can be used for the viscosity of crude oil, Fig. 5 for effective
viscosity of crude-oil/water mixtures, and Fig. 6 for the viscosity of natural gas. In using some of these figures,
the relationship between viscosity in centistokes and viscosity in centipoise must be used
(Eq. 7)
where
γ = kinematic viscosity, centistokes,
and
SG = specific gravity.
Fig. 4—Standard viscosity/temperature charts for liquid petroleum products (courtesy of ASTM).
(Eq. 8)
where
and
(Eq. 9)
where
and
Table 2
(Eq. 10)
(Eq. 11)
where
L = length, ft,
and
Assumptions: no work performed, steady-state flow, and f = constant as a function of the length.
Simplified equation
For practical pipeline purposes, Eq. 11 can be simplified to
(Eq. 12)
where
L = length, ft.
Fig. 7—Compressibility of low-molecular-weight natural gases (courtesy of Natl. Gas Processors Suppliers
Assn.).
Three simplified derivative equations can be used to calculate gas flow in pipelines:
All three are effective, but the accuracy and applicability of each equation falls within certain ranges of flow and
pipe diameter. The equations are stated next.
Weymouth equation
This equation is used for high-Reynolds-number flows where the Moody friction factor is merely a function of
relative roughness.
(Eq. 13)
where
L = length, ft,
and
Panhandle equation
This equation is used for moderate-Reynolds-number flows where the Moody friction factor is independent of
relative roughness and is a function of Reynolds number to a negative power.
(Eq. 14)
where
E = efficiency factor (new pipe: 1.0; good operating conditions: 0.95; average operating conditions:
0.85),
Lm = length, miles,
and
(Eq. 15)
where
and
Assumptions:
T = 520°R,
P1 = 15 psia,
Z = 1.0,
and
ΔP = < 10% of P 1 .
Weymouth equation
The Weymouth equation is recommended for smaller-diameter pipe (generally, 12 in. and less). It is also
recommended for shorter lengths of segments ( < 20 miles) within production batteries and for branch
gathering lines, medium- to high-pressure (+/–100 psig to > 1,000 psig) applications, and a high Reynolds
number.
Panhandle equation
This equation is recommended for larger-diameter pipe (12-in. diameter and greater). It is also recommended
for long runs of pipe ( > 20 miles) such as cross-country transmission pipelines and for moderate Reynolds
numbers.
Spitzglass equation
The Spitzglass equation is recommended for low-pressure vent lines < 12 in. in diameter (ΔP < 10% of P1).
The petroleum engineer will find that the general gas equation and the Weymouth equation are very useful.
The Weymouth equation is ideal for designing branch laterals and trunk lines in field gas-gathering systems.
Multiphase flow
Flow regimes
Fluid from the wellbore to the first piece of production equipment (separator) is generally two-phase liquid/gas
flow.
The characteristics of horizontal, multiphase flow regimes are shown in Fig. 8. They can be described as
follows:
Bubble: Occurs at very low gas/liquid ratios where the gas forms bubbles that rise to the top of the pipe.
Plug: Occurs at higher gas/liquid ratios where the gas bubbles form moderate-sized plugs.
Stratified: As the gas/liquid ratios increase, plugs become longer until the gas and liquid flow in separate
layers.
Wavy: As the gas/liquid ratios increase further, the energy of the flowing gas stream causes waves in the
flowing liquid.
Slug: As the gas/liquid ratios continue to increase, the wave heights of the liquid increase until the crests
contact the top of the pipe, creating liquid slugs.
Spray: At extremely high gas/liquid ratios, the liquid is dispersed into the flowing-gas stream.
Fig. 8—Two-phase-flow patterns in horizontal flow (courtesy of AMEC Paragon).
Fig. 9[1] shows the various flow regimes that could be expected in horizontal flow as a function of the superficial
velocities of gas and liquid flow. Superficial velocity is the velocity that would exist if the other phase was not
present.
[1]
Fig. 9—Horizontal multiphase-flow map (after Griffith).
The multiphase flow in vertical and inclined pipe behaves somewhat differently from multiphase flow in
horizontal pipe. The characteristics of the vertical flow regimes are shown in Fig. 10 and are described next.
Bubble
Where the gas/liquid ratios are small, the gas is present in the liquid in small, variable-diameter, randomly
distributed bubbles. The liquid moves at a fairly uniform velocity while the bubbles move up through the liquid at
differing velocities, which are dictated by the size of the bubbles. Except for the total composite-fluid density,
the bubbles have little effect on the pressure gradient.
Slug flow
As the gas/liquid ratios continue to increase, the wave heights of the liquid increase until the crests contact the
top of the pipe, creating liquid slugs.
Transition flow
The fluid changes from a continuous liquid phase to a continuous gas phase. The liquid slugs virtually
disappear and are entrained in the gas phase. The effects of the liquid are still significant, but the effects of the
gas phase are predominant.
[2]
Fig. 11—Vertical-multiphase-flow map (after Taitel et al.).
Table 3
(Eq. 16)
where
L = length, ft,
and
(Eq. 17)
where
(Eq. 18)
where
and
In downhill lines, flow becomes stratified as liquid flows faster than gas.
The depth of the liquid layer adjusts to the static pressure head and is equal to the friction pressure drop.
There is no pressure recovery in the downhill line.
In low gas/liquid flow, the flow in uphill segments can be liquid "full" at low flow rates. Thus, at low flow
rates, the total pressure drop is the sum of the pressure drops for all of the uphill runs.
With increased gas flow, the total pressure drop may decrease as liquid is removed from uphill segments.
The pressure drop at low flow rates associated with an uphill elevation change may be approximated with Eq.
19.
(Eq. 19)
where
and
The total pressure drop can then be approximated by the sum of the pressure drops for each uphill segment.
Resistance coefficients
The head loss in valves and fittings can be calculated with resistance coefficients as
(Eq. 20)
where
and
V = velocity, ft/sec.
The resistance coefficients Kr for individual valves and fittings are found in tabular form in a number of industry
publications. Most manufacturers publish tabular data for all sizes and configurations of their products. One of
the best sources of data is the Crane Flow of Fluids, technical paper No. 410. [3] The Natural Gas Processors
Suppliers Assn. (NGPSA) Engineering Data Book[4] and Ingersoll-Rand’s Cameron Hydraulic Data Book[5] are
also good sources of references for the information. Some examples of resistance coefficients are listed
in Tables 4 and 5.
Table 4
Table 5
Table 5 (Cont'd)
Table 5 (Cont'd)
Table 5 (Cont'd)
Flow coefficients
The flow coefficient for liquids, CV, is determined experimentally for each valve or fitting as the flow of water, in
gal/min at 60°F for a pressure drop of 1 psi through the fitting. The relationship between flow and resistance
coefficients can be expressed as
(Eq. 21)
In any fitting or valve with a known CV, the pressure drop can be calculated for different conditions of flow and
liquid properties with Eq. 22.
(Eq. 22)
where
and
SG = liquid specific gravity relative to water.
Again, the CV is published for most valves and fittings and can be found in Crane Flow of Fluids, [3] Engineering
Data Book,[4]Cameron Hydraulic Data Book,[5] as well as the manufacturer’s technical data.
Equivalent lengths
The head loss associated with valves and fittings can also be calculated by considering equivalent "lengths" of
pipe segments for each valve and fitting. In other words, the calculated head loss caused by fluid passing
through a gate valve is expressed as an additional length of pipe that is added to the actual length of pipe in
calculating pressure drop.
All of the equivalent lengths caused by the valves and fittings within a pipe segment would be added together
to compute the pressure drop for the pipe segment. The equivalent length, Le, can be determined from the
resistance coefficient, Kr, and the flow coefficient, CV, using the formulas given next.
(Eq. 23)
(Eq. 24)
and
(Eq. 25)
where
and
Table 6 shows equivalent lengths of pipe for a variety of valves and fittings for a number of standard pipe sizes.
Table 6
Nomenclature
Z = elevation head, ft,
P = pressure, psi,
ρ = density, lbm/ft3,
V = velocity, ft/sec,
μ = viscosity, lbm/ft-sec.
S = specific gravity of gas at standard conditions relative to air (molecular weight divided by 29),
Qg = gas-flow rate, MMscf/D.
ϕ = absolute viscosity, cp