Republic of the Phillppines

Department of Educatlon
Region X
LANAO DEL NORTE DivisiON
Gov. A. Quibranza Prov'l. Gov't. Compound
Pigcarangan, Tubod, Lanao del Norte
DIVISION MEMORANDUM
NO . 2021 RELE ASED
TO: CID, SGOD & OSDS Personnel
Process Owner/ Program Coordinator
Public Elementary and Secondary School Heads
Other Concemed
This Division

othahaAl
FROMEDILBERTO ENARIA, CESO
L BPLENARIA, CESO IVIV
Schools Division Superintendent

DATE: March 19, 2021

SUBJECT: QUALITY ASSURANCE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, MONITORING AND

EVALUATION (QATAME) IMPLEMENTATION
of
1. Per Regional Memorandum No. 607, s. 2019 entitled Policy on the Implementation in the
Quality Assurance, Technical Assistance, Monitoring and Evaluation (QATAME)
and other
Region, QATAME shall be implemented in all trainings, seminars-workshops,
related activities of the Department of Education in the Schools Division Office.

and
2. In line with this, the field is hereby informed that trainings, seminars-workshops
other related activities conducted in the division and school levels shall have QATAME.

3. After the conduct of the activity, the School Heads are directed to submit the following
reports:
a. QATAME Analysis Form 1
b. QATAME Analysis Form 2
C. Summary Result of Daily Evaluation of Session and Daily Operations
d. Summary Result of End of the Activity Evaluation
e. Attendance sheets of the participants
f. Pictorial report
g. Memorandum with approved matrix
h. Approved Food Menu (if applicable)

4. See enclosures of the QATAME tools for Daily Evaluation of Session and Daily
Operations, End of the Activity Evaluation, QATAME Analysis Form 1 and QATAME
Analysis Form 2.

5. The said reports shall be submitted five (5) days after the conduct of the activity to the
Division Office through SGOD Chief Maria Carmela T. Ablin.

6. Immediate dissemination and strict compliance with this Memorandum is highly

enjoined.
Enclosure 1 of Division Memorandum No. ____, s.2021
QATAME Form D
DAILY EVALUATION OF SESSION, FACILITATOR AND DAILY OPERATION
(To be administered every after a session)
Title of the Training: __________________________________________________________
Name of Participant (Optional): _______________________________________________
School (Optional): ________________ Division:_________________
Session Topic: ______________________________
Session Facilitator: ___________________________ Date: ______________
I. SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
1. What is your most significant learning for the day?
________________________________________________________________________
2. What will you do differently as a participant given your learning?
________________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION OF SESSION AND TRAINER/FACILITATOR
Check the appropriate column for your answer.
Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly
SESSION
Agree Disagree
4 3 2 1
1. Session started on time
2. Session ended on time
3. Topic was relevant to our work
4. Objectives of the session were achieved
5. Activities were congruent to objectives
6. Activities were appropriate for adult
learners
7. Participants were engaged in activities
8. Session materials were relevant
9. Session materials were adequate
10. Session materials were given on time
11.Time allotment was adequate
FACILITATOR/TRAINER
The trainer/facilitator…
1. exhibited mastery of the topic.
2. expressed ideas clearly.
3. asked stimulating questions
4. processed questions and responses to
deepen the learning.
5. was sensitive to the participants’ mood
6. maintained positive learning
environment
7. observed appropriate attire
How can the session be improved?
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS: __________________________________________________
Enclosure 2 of Division Memorandum No. ___, s.2021

END OF THE ACTIVITY EVALUATION

QAME Form F: End of Program Evaluation (Adopted from STRIVE-developed T and D System)

Respondent Type: Trainee Trainer Program Manager

Name (Optional): ____________________________ Sex: Male Female
Activity Title: _______________________________________________
Date: ________________________________________________________

Directions:Please assess the effectiveness of the activity program according to the

indicators below. Put a tick/check (/) under the appropriate column.

After the conduct of the training

program, I believe that… Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly
Agree (3) (2) Disagree
(4) (1)
A. Program Management
1. the training program was delivered as
planned
2. the training program was managed
efficiently
3. the training program was well-
structured
B. Attainment of Objectives
4. the activity objectives were clearly
presented
5. the activity and session objectives
were attained
C. Delivery of Content
6. The content was appropriate to
participants roles and responsibilities
7. content delivered was based on
authoritative and reliable sources
8. the session activities were effective in
generating learning
9. adult learning methodologies were
used effectively
10. management of learning was
effectively structured
11. contribution of all trainees was
encouraged
12. trainees demonstrated a clear
understanding of the content
delivered

D. Provision of Support Materials

13. the support materials provided were
appropriate to trainees’ needs
14. support
materials were adequate and were
given on time
 E. Program Management Team
15. Program Management Team
members were courteous
16. program Management Team was
efficient
17. program Management Team was
responsive to the needs of trainees
F. Venue
18. the venue was well lighted
19. The venue was well-ventilated
20. the venue was comfortable with
sufficient space for program activities
21. the venue had sanitary and hygienic
conditions with adequate comfort
rooms
22. the venue was comfortable with
sanitary and hygienic conditions with
footbath and other safety IATF
protocols
G. Meals (if applicable)
23. meals were nutritious and sufficient
in quantity and quality. (please refer
to approve food menu)
24. meals were generally well-prepared
and tasty

Please provide your honest response to each of the following questions:

Briefly describe what you have learned and how it will help you with your
work.

What do you consider your most significant learning from the program?

What changes would you suggest to improve similar programs in the

future?

What further comments do you have?

THANK YOU SO MUCH!

Enclosure 3 of Division Memorandum No. ____, s.2021

QATAME Analysis Form I:

ANALYSIS OF THE ONSITE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS

Title of the Training Program: __________________________________

Date: _______________________________

Venue: _______________________________________

NAME OF THE MONITOR: _______________________________

SCHOOL: _________________________________

SCHOOL HEAD:___________________________
PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation
Number of Participants:

Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the
participants, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the sessions? Of the facilitators? Identify the factors
that helped in these areas, if possible.
Strong Areas for Recommended
SESSION TITLE Points Improvement Steps to Address
the Issue/s
Session 1
Average
Session
Rating
DAY Facilitators
1: Average
Facilitators
Rating

PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Training Program

Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following
questions:
1. What are the strong points and areas for improvement of the daily operations of the
training program? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible and
give suggestions.
Overall Rating Strong Points Areas for
Improvement and
Suggestions
Day 1:
Day 2:
Day 3:
 2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe
these incidents in the table below:
Critical Incident (Refer to the Identify Proposed Course/s of
STAR form, 5Ws H) deviation from Action to Address the
Standard/s, Deviation
applicable

IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be used for Debriefing as Feedback to the Learning
Area Focal Person/Program Management Team for information and immediate action.

PART III. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE POST-PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION
Based on the results of the Post Program Evaluation, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the training program? Identify the factors that helped
in these areas, if possible. In which areas should the training program be
improved? Identify the factors that contributed to these areas, if possible.
Factors that have Suggestions for
helped/contributed to the Improvement
strong points/areas for
improvement
Strong Points
Areas for Improvement

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe
these incidents in the table below:
Critical Incident (Refer Identify deviation from Proposed Course/s of
to the STAR form) Standard/s Action to Address the
Deviation

PREPARED BY:

_____________________
SCHOOL HEAD

SUBMITTED TO:

MARIA CARMELA T. ABLIN, Ed.D.

Chief -SGOD
Enclosure 4 of Division Memorandum No. ____, s.2021
QATAME Analysis Form 2-
SUMMARY OF DAILY MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Title of the Training Program: _________________________

Date: _________________________________
Venue: ________________________________
School: __________________________________
School Head: ____________________________

1. What is the general evaluation of the session and facilitation?

Day Overall Rating for the Session Overall Rating Summary of Comments
for Facilitators and Suggestions
Day 1:
Day 2:
Day 3:
Major Observations/ Findings:

2. What is the general rating of the training program daily operations?

Day Overall Rating Summary of Significant Comments and
Suggestions
Day 1:
Day 2:
Day 3:
Major Observations/ Findings:

3. Are there critical incidents that should be addressed by the Training Program
Provider/Management?
4.
CRITICAL INCIDENT/S Training Provider Action Taken by Status
BASED ON STAR (5Ws and (National, Region, the Program
H) Division or School) Management

Major Observations/Findings:

5. What is the general post-program evaluation rating of the entire program?

Region/Section Overall Summary of Comments and Suggestions
Rating

Major Observations/Findings:

6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS:

7. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY ACTION:

PREPARED BY:

______________
School Head

SUBMITTED TO:

MARIA CARMELA T. ABLIN, Ed.D.

Chief -SGOD
Enclosure 5 of Division Memorandum No. ____, s.2021
SUMMARY RESULT FOR END OF THE TRAINING EVALUATIONS
END OF THE ACTIVITY
Program Title: ________________________________
Date: ____________________________
Venue: ___________________________
Number of Participants: ______________
School: ______________
School Head: ________________________

After the conduct of the training program , I believe that…

AVERAGE
A. Program Management (_____) RATING
1. the training program was delivered as planned
2. the training program was managed efficiently
3. the training program was well-structured
B. Attainment of Objectives (____)
4. the program objectives were clearly presented
5. the program and session objectives were attained
C. Delivery of Content (____)
6. program content was appropriate to trainees’ roles and
responsibilities
7. content delivered was based on authoritative and reliable
sources
8. the session activities were effective in generating learning
9. adult learning methodologies were used effectively
10. management of learning was effectively structured
11. contribution of all trainees were encouraged
12. trainees demonstrated a clear understanding of the
content delivered
D. Provision of Support Materials (_____)
13. the support materials provided were appropriate to
trainees’ needs
14. support materials were adequate and were given on time
E. Program Management Team (____)
15. program Management Team members were
courteous
16. program Management Team was efficient
17. program Management Team was responsive to the
needs of trainees
F. Venue (____)
18. the venue was well lighted
19. he venue was well-ventilated
20. the venue was comfortable with sufficient space for
program activities
21. the venue had sanitary and hygienic conditions with
adequate comfort rooms
22. the venue was comfortable with sanitary and hygienic
conditions with footbath and other safety IATF protocols
G. Meals (if applicable)
23. meals were nutritious and sufficient in quantity and
quality.
25. meals were generally well-prepared and tasty

Please provide your honest response to each of the following questions:

Briefly describe what you have learned and how it will help you
with your work.
Consolidated responses:

What do you consider your most significant learning from the

program?
Consolidated responses:

What changes would you suggest to improve similar programs in

the future?
Consolidated Responses:

What further comments do you have?

Consolidated Responses:

Prepared by:

_____________
SCHOOL HEAD
NOTED :

MARIA CARMELA T. ABLIN, Ed.D.

Chief ES - SGOD
Enclosure 6 of Division Memorandum No. ____, s.2021

SUMMARY RESULT FOR SESSIONS AND FACILITATORS

Title of Activity: ______________________ Date of Implementation: ___________________
School Head:________________________
Venue: _____________________________ Total Participants: _________________
Number of Responses: ________________

I. Significant Learning:
Consolidated responses:
1. What is you most significant learning for the day?
2. What will you do differently as a participant given
your learning?
II. Evaluation of Session and Trainer/Facilitator
DAY 1
SESSION Speaker 1 Speaker 2 Speaker 3
In this session…
NAME NAME NAME

1. Session started on time

2. Session ended on time
3. Topic was relevant to our work
4. Objectives of the session were achieved
5. Activities were congruent to objectives
6. Activities were appropriate for adult learners
7. Participants were engaged in activities
8. Session materials were relevant
9. Session materials were adequate
10. Session materials were given on time.
11. Time allotment was adequate.
Average Rating
TRAINER/FACILITATOR
1 exhibited mastery of the topic
2 expressed ideas clearly

3 asked stimulating questions

Processed questions and responses to
4 deepen the learning
5 was sensitive to the participants' mood
6 maintained positive learning environment
7 observed appropriate attire
Average Rating
Consolidated Responses:

How can the session be improved?

Comments/Suggestions:

Prepared by: Noted by:

School Head SGOD Chief