Persistent Entity Beans
Persistent Entity Beans
Entity beans differ from session beans in several ways. Entity beans are persistent, allow
shared access, have primary keys, and may participate in relationships with other entity
beans.
Persistence
There are two types of persistence for entity beans: bean-managed and container-
managed. With bean-managed persistence, the entity bean code that you write contains
the calls that access the database. If your bean has container-managed persistence, the
EJB container automatically generates the necessary database access calls. The code that
you write for the entity bean does not include these calls. For additional information, see
the section Container-Managed Persistence.
Shared Access
Entity beans may be shared by multiple clients. Because the clients might want to change
the same data, it's important that entity beans work within transactions. Typically, the
EJB container provides transaction management. In this case, you specify the transaction
attributes in the bean's deployment descriptor. You do not have to code the transaction
boundaries in the bean--the container marks the boundaries for you. See Chapter 14 for
more information.
Primary Key
Each entity bean has a unique object identifier. A customer entity bean, for example,
might be identified by a customer number. The unique identifier, or primary key, enables
the client to locate a particular entity bean. For more information see the section Primary
Keys for Bean-Managed Persistence.
Relationships
Like a table in a relational database, an entity bean may be related to other entity beans.
For example, in a college enrollment application, StudentEJB and CourseEJB would be
related because students enroll in classes.
You implement relationships differently for entity beans with bean-managed persistence
and those with container-managed persistence. With bean-managed persistence, the code
that you write implements the relationships. But with container-managed persistence, the
EJB container takes care of the relationships for you. For this reason, relationships in
entity beans with container-managed persistence are often referred to as container-
managed relationships.
Container-Managed Persistence
The term container-managed persistence means that the EJB container handles all
database access required by the entity bean. The bean's code contains no database access
(SQL) calls. As a result, the bean's code is not tied to a specific persistent storage
mechanism (database). Because of this flexibility, even if you redeploy the same entity
bean on different J2EE servers that use different databases, you won't need to modify or
recompile the bean's code. In short, your entity beans are more portable.
In order to generate the data access calls, the container needs information that you
provide in the entity bean's abstract schema.
Abstract Schema
Part of an entity bean's deployment descriptor, the abstract schema defines the bean's
persistent fields and relationships. The term abstract distinguishes this schema from the
physical schema of the underlying data store. In a relational database, for example, the
physical schema is made up of structures such as tables and columns.
You specify the name of an abstract schema in the deployment descriptor. This name is
referenced by queries written in the Enterprise JavaBeans Query Language ("EJB QL").
For an entity bean with container-managed persistence, you must define an EJB QL
query for every finder method (except findByPrimaryKey). The EJB QL query
determines the query that is executed by the EJB container when the finder method is
invoked. To learn more about EJB QL, see Chapter 8.
You'll probably find it helpful to sketch the abstract schema before writing any code.
Figure 3-1 represents a simple abstract schema that describes the relationships between
three entity beans. These relationships are discussed further in the sections that follow.
Figure 3-1 A High-Level View of an Abstract Schema
Persistent Fields
The persistent fields of an entity bean are stored in the underlying data store.
Collectively, these fields constitute the state of the bean. At runtime, the EJB container
automatically synchronizes this state with the database. During deployment, the container
typically maps the entity bean to a database table and maps the persistent fields to the
table's columns.
A CustomerEJB entity bean, for example, might have persistent fields such as
firstName, lastName, phone, and emailAddress. In container-managed persistence,
these fields are virtual. You declare them in the abstract schema, but you do not code
them as instance variables in the entity bean class. Instead, the persistent fields are
identified in the code by access methods (getters and setters).
Relationship Fields
A relationship field is like a foreign key in a database table--it identifies a related bean.
Like a persistent field, a relationship field is virtual and is defined in the enterprise bean
class with access methods. But unlike a persistent field, a relationship field does not
represent the bean's state. Relationship fields are discussed further in Direction in
Container-Managed Relationships.
Multiplicity in Container-Managed Relationships
One-to-one: Each entity bean instance is related to a single instance of another entity
bean. For example, to model a physical warehouse in which each storage bin contains a
single widget, StorageBinEJB and WidgetEJB would have a one-to-one relationship.
One-to-many: An entity bean instance may be related to multiple instances of the other
entity bean. A sales order, for example, can have multiple line items. In the order
application, OrderEJB would have a one-to-many relationship with LineItemEJB.
Many-to-many: The entity bean instances may be related to multiple instances of each
other. For example, in college each course has many students, and every student may take
several courses. Therefore, in an enrollment application, CourseEJB and StudentEJB
would have a many-to-many relationship.
In a unidirectional relationship, only one entity bean has a relationship field that refers to
the other. For example, LineItemEJB would have a relationship field that identifies
ProductEJB, but ProductEJB would not have a relationship field for LineItemEJB. In
other words, LineItemEJB knows about ProductEJB, but ProductEJB doesn't know
which LineItemEJB instances refer to it.