Musicality and The Intrinsic Motive Pulse: Evidence From Human Psychobiology and Infant Communication
Musicality and The Intrinsic Motive Pulse: Evidence From Human Psychobiology and Infant Communication
COLWYN TREVARTHEN
Department of Psychology,The University of Edinburgh
• ABSTRACT
Musicality in human motives, the psycho-biological source of music, is described
as a talent inherent in the unique way human beings move, and hence experience
their world, their bodies and one another. It originates in the brain images of
moving and feeling that generate and guide behaviour in time, with goal-defining
purposefulness and creativity. Intelligent perception, cognition and learning, and
the potentiality for immediate sympathy between humans for expressions of
intrinsic motives in narrative form (linguistic and non-linguistic). depend on this
spontaneous, self-regulating brain activity. It is proposed that evolution of human
bipedal locomotion and the pressure of social intelligence set free a new poly-
rhythmia of motive processes, and that these generate fugal complexes of the
Intrinsic Motive Pulse (IMP). with radical consequences for human imagination,
thinking, remembering and communicating. Gestural mimesis and rhythmic
narrative expression of purposes and images of awareness, regulated by, and
regulating, dynamic emotional processes, form the foundations of human
intersubjectivity, and of musicality. Acquired musical skill and the conventions of
musical culture are animated from this core process in the human mind.
Research on the dynamics of protoconversations and musical games with infants
elucidates the rhythmic and prosodic foundations of sympathetic engagement in
expressive exchanges. Developments in the first year prove the importance of
the impulses of natural musicality in the emergence of cooperative awareness,
and show how shared participation in the expressive phrases and emotional
transformations of vocal games can facilitate not only imitation of speech. but
interest in all shared meanings. or conventional uses, of objects and actions.
Disturbances of early communication attributable to emotional unavailability of a
depressed mother, or those due to sensory, motor or emotional handicap that
causes a child to fail to react in an expected normal way, both confirm the crucial
function in the development of intelligence and personality of sympathetic motives
shared between adult and child in a secure and affectionate relationship, and offer
a way of promoting development by supporting these motives. These facts
establish that the parameters of musicality are intrinsically determined in the brain,
or innate, and necessary for human development. Through their effects in
emotional integration and the collaborative learning that leads to mastery of
cultural knowledge, cultural skills, and language, they express the essential
generator of human cognitive development.
155
understand what action or process music develops from. Then we might be able to
appreciate what in it remains powerfully moving, in independence of the effects of
sophisticated experience - why music lasts.
Musicality, the psychological source of music, seems to be an eternal, given
psycho-biological need in all humans. Even though few in any society may be
known as musicians, professional story-tellers in sound, all of us are, as Blacking
observed (1979), "musical" from birth. The rhythmic impulse ofliving, moving and
communicating is musical, as is the need to "tell a story" in "narrative time", a need
that is inseparable from the human will to act with imagination of the consequences.
Music satisfies a rich pleasure in our responses to the grain and multilayered
arabesques of sound. It is in this sense that musicality precedes and underlies
language in the life of a child. Musicality, because it is in each and all of us,
permanently, compels sympathy of interest and moving across all cultural and
historical differences between individuals and communities, and from infancy to old
age. This is its adaptive value. We all possess the same fundamental capacity to
respond musically, however different our cultures of music may be.
Why, in what way, is musicality part of us?What is the special feature of human
purpose and lived experience that makes rhythm, harmony and contrasts of melodic
form naturally attractive to us? There would appear to be no easy answer to this
question from scientific analysis of the auditory perception or cognition of the
sound input to a listener's ear, or from theories of the timeless logical hierarchies or
architectonic structures in music written down. The literature in this analytical
tradition is arcane and frustrating. It seems we have to go to the source of experience
in acting, the generative images of moving, to find a convincing account, to balance
the reasoned explanation and give it authenticity; and we have to give a central role
in our explanation to the sense o/time in moving - the time it takes to step, jump,
glide, hit, grasp, lift, throw, caress, or to think and talk - the measures and tensions
of time that originate in the mind inwardly and become an output), The dynamic
repetitive impulse that is cultivated and remembered in music is present in the way
(1) The neglect of the sense of time on contemporary psychology and linguistics is astonishing. For
example, in the MIT Encylopedia of Cognitive Science (Wilson and Keil, 1999), just published with
473 entries, none - on memory (short term, long term, etc.), prosody, poetic metre, thinking,
speech, language, mental representation... - have any reference to actual durations in mental
activity or brain time. There are no entries for "reaction time", or "rhythm", or "music". The only
entry I could find in which the time of intrinsic mental events is explicitly discussed and interpreted
is that on "Time in the Mind" by Poppel and Wittmann (loc. cit.), and infants' acute sensitivity to
timing of expressions is mentioned in my entry on "Intersubjectivity" (Trevarthen, 1999).
Contemporary cognitive psychology appears to have "mislaid time". The same can be said for
linguistics. Thus, David Crystal, in his beautifully illustrated new Cambridge Encyclopedia of
Language (Crystal, 1997) has deleted the information on the durations of vocalisations from many
of his figures, and the timing of prosodic and poetic elements is not given. Rhythm is treated as a
formal pattern or structure of sequential events, with the phenomena of time removed.
157
(2) In Gibson's ecological perception theory, the "theory of affordances" (Gibson, 1979),
responsibility for awareness of reality is give to the dynamic "invariants" in environmental
information that the subject "picks up" while acting. But the contribution from the timing and
body-related shapingof the subject's innate motive processes is assumed, and not explained.
158
The natural history of innate musicality sets psychological science several tasks. First
we must conceive the natural inner constraints or motives of musical behaviours, and
how to separate them from the infinire variety ofskillsand learned patterns ofmusic
(Clynes, 1983; Flowers et al, 1995; Jones, 1976. 1982; Jones and Boltz, 1989;
Trevarthen, 1993b, 1998a, b). We have to stop thinking of music forms as physical
objects of auditory perception and cognition - as if we would ever be capable of
understanding music if all we could do was hear the sounds in it, like a tape recorder
feeding into a sound sorting system! We have to look to, and listen for, the original
generative forms of the impulse to express the dynamic patterns of our minds in
communicable forms. We have to recall what happens when music is made.
And, in a modern scientific world that believes it should identify all mind
processes with brain activity, we will want to build some kind of theory of the
neural mechanisms that can move and feel the body in these musical ways, and that
(3) Ian Cross (1999) identifies the human talent for music with "the most important thing we ever
did" - the evolution of intermodal cognition. This is viewed as the crucial integrating factor
between "modules" of intelligence - cognitive processing territories of the brain. However, Cross
also endorses the contribution of Merlin Donald's "mimesis" (Donald, 1991), which implies a
sympathetic awareness of bodily movement in others, and response to the rhythms of posture and
gesture in narrative expression. The talent and need for music is directly and immediately
important in human communication, whatever it may offer for cognition. If it integrates processes
of thought and consciousness, it does so with emotion.
159
set within the receptive architecture of the IMF (Turner, 1985. 1991)4. However. I
am attending most particularly to the making side because I regard that as primary
both in the generation of states of consciousness. and in the development of
intelligence through a combination of investigative curiosity and communication
(Trevarthen, 1998a, b).
In the generating and regulating core of the brain, the IMP, movement-creating
reticular networks and nuclei are intricately combined with the neurochemical
systems of emotion. The same activating neurones that select movements and
control their energy and smoothness also cause changes in the emotions felt. and the
intensity and "colour" of consciousness. That is why it is next to impossible to find
drugs that will treat the symptoms of illusory awareness and panic in psychosis
without unwanted side effectsin motor restlessness or dis-co-ordination. The musical
impulse moves the body and also involves the excites neurochemistry of felt elation
and sadness. or of vitality and repose.
In imagination and memory these moods and acute transitions in affect are
associated with knowledge of specific objects. events, persons perceived and
adventures shared. The cognitive residue of consciously acting and experiencing
represents the emotion for that object, or in that moment. The time frame of the
moving that first created the experience is faintly recalled. or lost entirely.
It is the same with music. Its beauty can derive from "emotion recollected in
tranquillity". and the form and texture of the sound may be appreciated with
timeless pleasure or excitement. The melody and drama can be "re-cognised" by a
listener. or "envisioned" by a composer in an instant. and the score can be laid out
and "cut and pasted" intellectually. without recalling the movement of the IMP. But
as soon as the music is made. by singing or playing or even by vividly "hearing" it
in the mind. the pulse and emotional variation of movement is back in place,
proving that it was present unconsciously in the architecture of the music all
along. As with language, which can be perceived, stored and studied as a timeless
structure, but which is made in the time of expressive conversation. the activity of
music is full of gestural rhythms and emphasis. The harmony of the performance or
intonation and "voice quality" or timbre is in the precise composition of the motor
preparation and its effective enactment.
Emotions of anticipation, fear, excitement, joy, anxiety,interest, and the rest arise
from one's anticipation in acting. They are conveyed to others by movements of
(4) Turner(1985, 1991) accounts for our pleasure in beautyof all kindsasan evolutionaryresponse
to order and process in nature,and indeed in the universe. It is a featureof our naturalconstitution
that enables us to respond with understanding intelligence to what nature offers for appreciation
and use. I would give a special place in the excitement from beautiful creations of music to the
sympathetic sense that singles out the forms, activities and artificialcreations of other human bodies
and minds for emotional appreciation. That is, the most moving sense of beauty in music may be
that which hasa moral implication, and not just an aesthetic one. Turneris, of course, not excluding
the sense of human beauty, and he and POppel have specifically addressed the appreciation of the
beauty in "mind time" as this is conveyed in poetic metre (Turner and POppel, 1988).
161
THE PHYSIOLOGY OF EFFECTIVE MOTIVES, AND THE EMOTIONS THAT EVALUATE THEM
action and located in body-centred time and space, the internal physiological state
and dynamic homeostasis of the organism must also be made ready for every effort
and experience anticipated, and the potential dangers or benefits of every object to
be dealt with. The physiologically adaptive, life-protecting quality of acting must be
estimated, specified, and signalled back to the anticipatory motive processes of the
mind, as well.
Primitive emotions have a dimension of force, energy or "arousal" derived from
the motive image of the action that they regulate, and a second dimension related
to the positive or negative, pleasurable or painful effects expected in the body, and
hence related to the approach/avoidance motivation or "value" in the intended
action. They also evaluate the efficiency, elegance and grace, or conversely the
roughness and harshness, of moves of the self and of others. This is how emotions
can be explained at the first level, for a simple creature moving about. The emotions
of conscious, imaginative and sympathetic humans have other forms and functions,
retained and transformed in the values of thought and recollection. Nevertheless,
emotions always develop from their service to the anticipating function of images
and plans for acting.
(5) Lee (1998) has formulated a theoretical "tau" function that defines movement to a goal, or to
"close a gap" in space and time. Information in the mind about the "tau" of a gap, the time to
closure at the current closure-rate, can be used to control movement across the gap. The theoretical
function has been supported by data from numerous experiments on movements of many species
of animal to various goals in the environment, the performance of car drivers and athletes,
movements of drumming and piano playing, and by studies of how a human subject coordinates
the movements of different parts of the body with each other. Intrinsic "taus" govem the latter
coordinations, within-the-subject gap closures, and "intrinsic tau" theory can be applied to the
coordination between subjects, as in conversation or playing music together. In tau theory the
"intrinsic tau guide" determinesthe duration (or frequency) of the movement, as well asdetails of its
time course, and translates in mathematical terms emotion or the expressive aspects of the
movement.
163
'64
(6) Braten (1988, 1992, 1998) has considered the essential representational requirements of
efficient intermentallife in "companion space". He postulates a "virtual other" represented in the
mind of each cooperatively thinking agent that engages "e-motionally". or through movement,
with actual others in "felt immediacy". The sympathetic abilities of infants in ·protoconversational"
engagements attests the existence of such a representation.
165
(7) A video film on movement of the body in walking, dancing, playing and working that
powerfully illustratesthe polyrhythmic fluency of the human body has been produced by Fr"shaug
and Aahus (1995), based on The Muse Within by the musicologist Bj"rkvold (1992).
1&6
physical range of times. These are real innate, prefunctionally developed anatomico/
physiological components permeating the neural systems, holding groups of neurons
in synchronously active communities with different periodic tendencies, different
dynamic flexibilities and different relations with parts of the body, linking all parts
in a coherent federation that gives the acting and perceiving self its ternporo-sparial
integrity. Their relation to the dynamic standards of musicality is evident (jones,
1976, 1982; Jones and Boltz, 1989; Fraisse, 1982; Epstein, 1995). Motive time may
be derived from very ancient motive elements driving animal life (Gallistel, 1980),
but they have a new vitality in human consciousness.
Motives and emotions unite on the coordination of purpose and passion in
movement and experience. In dance and music, very slow movements convey
introspective, "spiritual", abstract emotional states and the "disembodied" and
"irrational"narrative flow of feelings and recollections, "out of body" and "out of
mind". Quick expressive movements, with varied force, convey information about
transient or momentary and instinctive emotional changes or reactions, and these
are more directly associated with cognitive operations of conscious perception,
language and "declarative" memory, and combinations of the sames.
I believe human musicality is unique in the world of animals because our motives,
consciousness and communication are different from those of other animals", More
fundamentally, we are musical, and beasts are little or not, because we have evolved
with a different posture and a different kind of motor coordination. Individual acts
may not be swifter or surer, and formulated sequences may not be more graceful and
(8) Clynes has demonstrated that dynamic forms of expressive movement, either in the voice or in
manual touch pressure,can be identified as signatures or "sentic forms" for different emotions. The
time, space and vital qualities of living are differently represented in the rhythms of action and the
ebb and flow, or sharp transitions, of emotion (Clynes, 1973, 1980, 1983; Clynes and Nettheim,
1982). Rather than specific signature shapes for categories of emotion, sentic forms may be
conceived as configurations of transforming motor effort, manifesting qualities of the successive
states or transitions of the IMP in the course of single expressions of feeling.
(9) However intricately beautiful to our ears bird song or the song of the whale may be, and
however inspiring to a composer, neither of these forms of animal expression is either freely
"conversational" or unrestricted "narrative making". A bird may learn a song by a kind of mimesis
in an early "critical period" of the development of the bird's brain, but the form practised is not
"negotiated" intersubjectively, and it is not infinitely variable in its message as human songs are.
Every bird's song has a very strong inherent template, which enables an ornithologist to identify
the species, or even the sub-species, of a bird he cannot see. The musical "culture" of bird
vocalisations, even those that mimic echoically other species and environmental sounds, is perhaps
more limited than that of a newborn infant who has learned songs a mother has sung as she
waited for the birth.
161
MIIUseconds
A IS '- u
I e-zc ms. "U-.... ms. l~~uums. .;:lU-,l.UU ms.
~hiIIe I Symbol system; , ~~llltlve; SIlJlWe5t
IntelUgence. Involuntary. deUberate IICL
Ac:c:ess and rell"leval
SOAR system a fromLTM. Decision cycle
Event Related Brain stem Sensory potentials. 11"i200 'Mismatch'
Potentials b responses Nl00 'Auentlon' wave.
Physiology wave.
Sleep. Autonomic
Physiology c
a Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press;
b Coles, M. G. H., & Rugg, M. D. (1995). Event related brain potentials: an introdudion. In
M. D. Rugg and M. G. H. Coles (eds), Electrophysiology of mind: event related brain potentials
and cognition (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press;
c Delamont, R. S., lulu, P. O. 0., & lama I, G. A. (1999). Periodidty of a noninvasive measure
of cardiac vagal tone during non-rapid eye movement sleep in non-sleep-deprived and sleep-
deprived normal subleds. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 16(2), 146-153;
d Wittmann, M., & Poppe/, E. (1999). Temporal mechanisms of the brain as fundamentals of
communication - with special reference to music perception and performance. (This volume);
1&8
I
the present. Information Is given on times found in physiological processes of the
in machine intelligence. Some examples of the timing of spontaneous actions of
exchanges presented by Malloch, 1999). Purposes and experiences longer than
representations In perceptual Images and language. and by the cognitive
emotional value and causal connections
Seconds
ms. ms. s.
gnitive; simple selective oper
Primitive operalDrs
Consciously-eonuolled action
Short Term Memory
u omotor
'Scan path'
Separate head orientations
Long visual fixation.
Sight-ta-saccade interval.
Frontal sentence processing.
e Triesman, M., Cook, N., Naish, P. L. N., & MacCrone, J. K. (1994). The internal clock:
electroencephalographic evidence for oscillatory processes underlying time perception.
auaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A(2), 241-288;
f Posner, M. I., Abdullaev, Y. G., McCandliss, 8. D., & Sereno, S. C (1999). Anatomy, circuitry
and plasticity of word reading. In J. Everatt (ed), Reading and dyslexia: visual and attentional
processes (pp. 137-162). London and New York: Routledge;
g Trevarthen, C, Murray. L., & Hubley, P. A. (1981). Psychology of infants. In J. Davis and
J. Dobbing (eds), Scientific foundations of clinical paediatrics, 2nd ed. (pp. 211-274). London:
Heinemann Medical.
169
A person makes meaning in every task he or she performs with conscious interest
and inventive purpose. At the core of human conscious life is a restless impulsiveness
that makes patterns out of the "time in the mind" and out of the form-changes of a
body in movement, a body that has a particular polarity and symmetry, that has
many quasi-independent parts, that is designed to make tangible, visible and audible
to others like it, and who move like it, every nuance of motivation and feelings. The
human body makes awareness of the mass and inertia of its parts and its whole into
conscious signatures of the will to move. The rhythms, energy and tension of
its impulses are combined in "textures" of trying to act and of experiencing the
consequences. These textures of the human IMP become "texts" for other humans
to "read". We play and think and invent with dramatic and metaphorical, rhythm
based, body-related mimesis (Donald, loco cit.).
All animal and human communication is based on sympathy - for body form
and for body mooementt», The motivating power of this sympathy is clear in the
ways animals co-operate as parents, offspring and siblings, as co-operators in group
life,as predators and prey, and especially in the imitations and acrobaticsynchronisations
of the young at play (Bateson, 1956; Bekoff and Byers, 1998), with its "serious
ambiguity" (Sutton-Smith, 1998). Human sympathetic consciousness drives endless
creativity in art and technique. The communication that animates this level of
mind-mind sympathy depends on a taste for metaphor - and for myth, which
Northrup Frye, in his writings on "Myth and Metaphor", calls, "a universally
intelligible language" (Frye, 1990, p. 3). Metaphorical sympathy recognises likeness
of quality, form and movement, and it does so with emotion. It refers to all natural
kinds of motives, feelings and states of purpose and awareness.
Human action, freely expressed, has the richest time sense, the richest musical or
poetic potentialities, and the greatest appetite for narrative. This is the character of
our intense sociability and it peculiar fancifulness.
If we watch persons going about their ordinary business, working alone, mingling
and chatting in a crowd, or negotiating and collaborating in a collective task, we see
that, while the human body is built to walk on two legs to an inner drum, at the
same time it is intricately juggling hips, shoulders and head as a tower of separately
mobile parts above the stepping feet. While walking, we freely turn and twist, glance
with eyes jumping to left and right, extend waving limbs, make intricate gestures of
the hands, talk, all in coordinated phrases of flowing rhythm. This moving has a
multiplicity of semi-independent impulses, a potentiality for multi-rhythmic
coordination that is surely richer than any other species possesses, inviting witty
(10) The Scottish philosopher Adam Smith defined "sympathy" by referring to the imitative
mirroring of postures and gestures of a crowd who are watching a street gymnast, and he claimed
that this sympathetic sense is strong in young children (Smith, 1759).
171
(11) Human bipedalism hasa long evolutionary history, and it hastransformed many functions of
the brain and the body, including the form and suspension of internalorgans, and the anatomy of
the vocal tract and face, contributing to the emergence of a respiratory and vocal system with the
potential for speech and a greatly enhanced facial expressiveness, aswell as freeing the hands for
both object manipulation and gestural expression (Klein, 1999; Lewin, 1999).
172
The universal features of human musicality, its timing, emotive expression and
intersubjective sympathy, are clear signs of innate motives, and music functions
everywhere as a primary motivating force in human life. Should we not find that at
least the foundations of these talents are possessed by an unsophisticated infant?
Indeed, as has been mentioned, it is remarkable how sensitive infants are to
musical dimensions in maternal vocalisations and in artificial sound patterns
that mimic the human voice. And a very young infant will take critical interest in
coordinating their limited repertoire of movements to the musicality of maternal
expressions. Infant listeners have surprised psychologists who have devised tests and
behavioural analyses to demonstrate what the infants perceive in sound forms.
Infants seem born with a kind of musical wisdom and appetite. Most remarkable
is the precise sensitivity to timing and accurate coordination that even newborns can
show in favourable conditions of intimate communication by sounds, touch and
vibration (Malloch, this volume; van Rees and de Leeuw, 1987). Infants are not just
student listeners.
It is amazing what an infant can hear, and wants to hear. Experiments that
measure the preferential orienting of newborns to voices have proved that they
already recognise acoustic "fingerprints" of their mothers speech, or musical and
poetic sound themes to which the mother has exposed them in utero. So foetuses
can listen, at least in the last trimester ofgestation, with musical discrimination, and
they can learn to identify, and seek, a mother's distinctive sounds. There is little for
a foetus to see before birth, but within minutes of coming to the light of the
world a baby can see well enough not only to track an object, but to imitate facial
expressions and gestures of a sympathetically attentive person who is making
demonstrations of these signals. And a newborn human is particularly alert to the
eyes of a person speaking, drawing comfort and regulation of inner state from
the expression of interest and affection that eyes carry with the gentle voice of a
caregiver.
173
expressions, and a readiness for conversational duets, which develop rapidly within
the care support and playfulness of parents' responses (Brazelton et al., 1974;
Trevarthen, 1979, 1993b. 1997).
Newborn infants show motives with identifiable goals (Trevarthen et al., 1981;
Trevarrhen, 1984a. 1997. 1998a). They act coherently. with trunk. the proximal and
distal segments of their limbs and their eyes yoked so that these body parts move
together in flowing transitions. For example, orientations of the two eyes in
synchrony (conjugately) are coupled to rotations of the head and of the shoulders
on the hips, extensions and retractions of the legs and feet, and reaching and
grasping movements of the arms and hands. There is a choreography in these
postural changes that is adapted to turning. stepping towards, reaching after and
grasping an object that has been located visually, even when. as often happens with
a newborn. there is actually no object there as the perceived goal for the "pre-
reaching" or "pre-walking". The timing of the displacements of eyes, head, trunk,
arms and hand is regulated and these separately mobile components show
synchronised pulses in a hierarchy of values that match many of those seen in adult
movement (Tables IA and B). In innate motive impulses, a matching anatomy of
movement, and the same time-space framework provide the common ground for
mutual awareness and interaction between a newborn and an adult (Trevarthen,
1998a. b: Trevarthen et al., 1999).
176
other (Malloch, this volume). In early protoconversations, when the infant is six
weeks old, they set up alternation or "turn taking" on a slow adagio (one beat
in 900 milliseconds or 70/minute). Within a month or two the beat of their shared
vocal play accelerates to andantt (1/700 milliseconds; 90/minute) or moderato
(1/500 milliseconds; 120/minute), but the more animated engagements are
games rather than protoconversarions (Sylvester-Bradley and Trevarthen, 1978).
Microanalysis reveals how closely adult and infant are coordinated (Stern, 1971;
Fogel, 1977; Beebe, 1982; Feldstein et al., 1993; Malloch, this volume). When
attempting to synchronise their vocalisations and "fuse" on the beat each, mother or
baby, can "catch up" with the other with a lag of 120 to 250 milliseconds. The
mother catches the infant a little more quickly than the infant catches the mother,
but they are both getting on the beat in about this time. Comparison with adult
speech and other kinds of flowing expressive behaviour, including dance and music,
indicates that about 120 to 250 milliseconds is the normal duration of a wide
variety of "pre-beat" signals - the article before a noun, prefixes, an unstressed
syllable in poetry, the up-beat of a conductor's baton, etc. (See Table I). Whole
utterances in the mother's baby-talk to very young infants tend to be short (about
half to 0.75 seconds). They are repetitive and with rhythmic intonation and
undulating pitch. The regular, simplified rhythms undoubtedly help the infant to
synchronise. The range of rhythmic and prosodic features in a mother's speech
becomes much greater after the baby is three months old when it contains more
vigorous teasing and nonsensical repetitious sounds (Malloch, this volume).
In happy proroconversations the baby makes relaxed, resonant "coos", with lips
protruding like a trumpet. Coos, which are revealed by phonological analysis to be
nuclear vowel sounds, have only rudimentary articulation (Oller and Eilers, 1992).
In alternative, unvoiced utterances the tongue and lips make many brief appositions
of differing shape. These outbursts of oral activity called "prespeech" are, like coos,
usually emphasised with a expressive hand movements or "proto-gestures" (pre hand
signs) that take a rich variety oHorms (Trevarthen, 1974, 1986b). Usually lifts of
the hands and extensions or appositions of the fingers are precisely synchronised
with or rhythmically linked to coos or prespeech. Repetitive babbling does not come
until the baby is about 6 months old, and this kind of vocalisation is often a kind of
self-stimulating game, babies often babbling to themselves at play, or while lying in
the cot after sleeping (Oller and Eilers, 1992; Locke, 1993, 1995).
Protoconversation between infants and their caretakers has, then, invariant
features which reflect; (a) coordination between the various channels of expression
and modalities of awareness of the infant, who can behave as a coherent and fluent
expressive actor, and (b) a mutual comprehension or empathy by means of which
infant and partner improvise an integrated and patterned engagement or performance.
Different qualities of engagement are determined by a shared spectrum of emotions
which gain organisation between them by their mutual influence on each other
in the communications. Homologous emotions in infant and caretaker generate
177
(DeCasper and Fifer, 1980; Trehub, 1990; Fassbender, 1996; Papousek, 1994,
1996). It seems that the infants' acute ability to hear musical elements in a mother's
voice is important for "state regulation" by the mother's sympathetic response to the
infant's expressions of arousal, fretfulness, tiredness, playfulness, joy, etc. (PapouSek
and PapouSek, 1981). It is clear, however, that the infant is not just responding to
the mother's signals with a reflex state change. The kind of speech or song a mother
uses is very much a response to the rhythms and emotional quality of the infant's
expressions. The success of motherese or a mother's singing depends on a co-
construction of a joint, two-way "performance". The mother is "attuning" to
musicality in the infants manifestations of purposefulness, alertness and emotion -
she is communicating with the infant (jones, 1990; Papousek, M., 1994, 1996;
Papousek and Papousek, 1981, 1987, 1989; Stern et al., 1985; Stern, 1993, 1999).
Infants hear music in the human voice, in instrumental playing or in the artificial
tones and groups of tone presented to them in the laboratory - they detect motive
impulses in the movements (or electronic simulations of movements) that generate
the sounds. Even the preferences for classical tonality and sensitivity for timbral
differences can be interpreted as data about the energy or emotional effort and
"purity" of control in the human voice or in other human action. Infants are listening
for the psychological energy of the IMP. Observation of infants listening to and
moving with mother's singing and dancing movements, or to recorded music, shows
that from the earliest months the babies are seeking to become physically involved
in the expressive message - to dance with the melodic narrativet-,
By recording changes in their heart beat with attention to novel events, where
they chose to look, or by causing their head rotations, leg movements or sucking to
trigger stimuli, it has been possible to show that infants, even newborns, are
extremely sensitive to expressions of emotion in body movements and touching,
voice, or facial movements (Lipsett, 1967; Papcusek, 1967; Eisenberg, 1975;
DeCasper and Carstens, 1981; Bower, 1982; Jusczyk, 1985).
Orienting of the baby's head towards a loudspeaker that is presenting a change
in sound patterns has been used by a number of researchers to show that subjects
(12) In the past 25 years, research has transformed psychologists' appreciation of what infants can
perceive and do with physical stimuli, objects and events, especially Visually perceived events. Now
the abilities of infants to perceive, react to and influence the behaviours of human partners in live
communication are receiving more attention, though interpretations of the evidence are diverse
and often incompatible, some defending the conservative rationalistic view that the innate
endowments are in the nature of general cognitive abilities, or a few special purpose "modular"
mechanisms for perceptually detecting other subjects. It is Widely assumed that the young infant
has not yet constructed a coherent "self", and, therefore, cannot sustain awarenessof contingent
reactions of persons to the infant's actions (e.g. Rochat, 1999). Obviously, the initial state of
the infant mind presents serious theoretical challenges for the dominant paradigm in psychology.
A prime source of confusion is due to the tendency to overlook "brain time" and the intrinsic
rhythmicality of purposes as a fundamental, and innate, coordinating principle for cognitive
processes and their development.
179
We have learned much about what infants want from company by analysing what
people do to entertain them. and how it changes. Musical play. including traditional
baby songs and invented vocal glosses in games or nonsense chants. spontaneously
180
-
~
-CI_
~ C3
~~ :~
is 0
It
.
I I I I I I I
0 2 4 8 10 12 14 seconds
ba
1,
When blows cradle r -0- ck.
,
•,
thewlDd I the I wUI I
UneOne UneTWo
•
22.051CHz -r------------.....---------------,
-
§'" -
L~
",-'1
.... A
~ G
t;- ~
~ D
C4
~
B
A
G
~
~
is D
It I
14 16
,
Une Four
181
(13) Forthese songs I thank Caroline Howell, who sang them, and Stephen Malloch who madethe
spectrographs and pitchplotsusing the methods he has described (Malloch et al., 1997;Malloch, this
volume).
18:1
TOTAL 28.02
...
III MEANS 7.00 3.50 1,751 584 168 10.42
...
JACK AND JILL TIMES
Seconds Milliseconds
Line Phrases Av. Bar Av. Beat Vibrato
2 in line = line/4 = line/8 avo of 10
1. Jack and Jill went up the hill, to Ifttch a pail of water. 4.50 2.26 2.25 1,126 562 193
2. Jack fell down, and broke his crown, and /Jill came tumbling after. 4.47 2.23 2.24 1,118 559 165
TOTAL 18.04
MEANS 4.51 2.26 1,096 548
Muskality and the IntrlMIc motive pulse
COLWYN TllEVARTHEN
VERTICAL
o HORIZONTAL
way the vibrato in "Rock-a-bye baby" with three utterances of the word "cradle"
appears to changc with the tempo!•.
115
(15) I am indebted to Dr. Gunilla Preisler, of the Department of Psychology, Stockholm University,
for permission to analyse the mother's singing and the infant's responses. The recording was made
in the course of Dr. Preisler's work with blind infants (Preisler and Palmer, 1986). Alice Tegner's
songs are published in a Swedish songbook for children (Alfons, 1988).
186
~~~
I
~ stat - te han sitt lil - fa ben och den lang - a Iud - na svan - sen.
Up-par-na sm! ut-av bar a-ro bl!. "Ba - ra jag slappatt sa en-samhar gl!"
Figure 4. Swedish baby songs. "Ekarr'n satt i granen" and "Mars iii-fa Ot-le",
Olle" has 4 stanza, each of 4 phrases which together tell an exciting story. The infant,
oblivious to the meaning of the words, "aces" portions of the "melodrama" of each
story in a stunningly appropriate way.Table 4 summarises the intricate timing of the
elements of the mother's performance, and the different rhythmic levels.
187
...
III 22.05 KHz
III
N
~
9
-M
~ l' ....
z
w ,- :"
" :,...
w
aa: ,....
- . ~. -- .. t_ ,."..~
.. -.-- .:
u. C4 ..
..OF:.;: ~:.~ ·-'-r·'~~~'-·'- ,~ ~.:;': ~-:.~: -- ..- .~;~ i::._ ,. -,..~ ........ :' :- ~ ~.; .
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 seconds
-tom, Hoppa'han pa tallegren, stotte hansitt lllla ben och den langa ludna svan- sen
o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 u ~ ~ U~
Man III-la 01- Ie I ,1<0- len lick, ro-sor pi kin' de n sol- ,lten I bllck. Lap-par·na smA ut-av bar am blA. "Ia-,. J.. ,lapp an saen- sam liar Ill"
..
CD
10
ZZ.05 KHz
N ,
8-' i 11
.-~.
,: .~.
~
~
~ c
IU .
.... C4
'"
4].07 Hz
~-~;::. ;'.·-t:..-.,~:~~~-~·~~~~- f~:~-~~:_:~ ;.~-.~.~:', -:.~.~ -.;;~~;.:~. . ~
r
.a
29 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 s- !T
co
Brummelll·brum, vem lur· SIr dar? Bus- lear-na kna·1ra. En hund vlSSI del Ir. Lur- vii Ir palsen, Men Olle bllr llad: "A. en leamral, del var bra, se loddal!" n-
oa
(16) For the transcription of the mother's singing, and the literal translation into English, I thank
Monica Hedenbro and Annette Liden.
(17) The quality of the VHS video sound in this recording does not permit pitch plots, and the
spectrographs include sounds of movement of the infants clothes and of sucking and laughter.
Nevertheless, the melodic line and timing of the mother's song are clear.
190
Table III
Timing of Swedish baby songs
.OTAL 35,D30
( _ I: 19,980.
v..... 2: 15,DS01
MEANS 5,llO6 1,251 5,006
f---s BnunmeJJjbrum, vem Juls.,. dar? Bnmunelibrwn. who is !",<ing h..,.l 7.3 900
'"T au.kama knob. En hund villi dot ir. Th. bush.. cracklng. A dog is sumy """"-. 7.6 914
I---y LurviS ir pilaon. Mon OUo bUr glad: Funy 10th. coal BUIOIla becomes glad: 7.2 880
~ -A, en kamrat.det Val bra, Ie soddaSI- "Qh a friend, thai wu good, good-dayr 7.4 29.5 929
~ /Clapp" .. bjamen mod hinder om', Stroking th. boar with hands smaU 7.7 938
ew ricker fram korson: "So dir. amob pAl" Off.ring him the bukot: "Look , tasl. it," 7.2 957
fJI NaU. han slukar moat alit vad dir ir: Teddy gobbl.. almosl aUthai is there: 7:J 900
rt2 "Hor dUojag lrar. all du tyeller 00\ hir'" "Usten. I think thai you lib borriool" 7.3 29.5 929
rrr Mor fick nu ee dem, gIIv till en: 1m. Mother now tees them" sav. out • Kream. 7.6 9SO
r-t4 ~mm IPrllnl bart, nu if leken. f&bU The bear ran away, now the lame is overl 7.4 914
fi5 • , varior Ikrimde du unan min Yin? "Oh. why did you frighlen away my friondl 8.1 990
fl6 Mor lilla, bod honom komma igon!" Motherdear, ask him to come back.aBain!" 8.8 31.9 1086
TOTAL 1l~.8
MEANS 7.49 29.95 929
Moan Ph.... (1/2 lin. 3.74
and that the music makes the words of an appealing narrative both richer and more
memorable. The link between melody and memory must explain one key function
of musicality, or poetics - they make sharable and retrievable meanings.
How are we to account for this infants ability? Is it likely that she has learned
some special trick, or that she is a freak of nature? She certainly could not learn or
imitate how to make the appropriate gestures by seeing hands. She appears to just
"know", much like a newborn "knows" how to smile pleasure or pout distress. This
particular infant's sensitivity to her mother's voice and her song may well be
1'1
enhanced by the fact that she is blind, and it is probably important that her mother
has been encouraged to communicate with her with voice and touch. There is other
evidence that the gestures of blind babies are particularly expressive (Fraiberg,
1979). However, the mother was not aware of her daughter's "musical" gestures.
In fact, this sympathy of hand gestures for the melody of speech or song is not a
rare skill in infants. "Intersynchrony" between a newborn's hand movements and the
syllables of adult speech, first reported by Condon and Sander (1974), is common.
I find that in the films I have of babies from a few weeks old to one year attending
to speech and song in many different languages there are frequent caseswhere subtle
gestures are made in spontaneous synchrony with rhythmic elements of the vocal or
instrumental sounds the babies are hearing. It is our loss that we know so little about
the generation and regulation of this remarkable natural behaviour.
Finally, this behaviour of a young baby is far beyond that any other species of
animal can achieve - in its intricacy, narrative cohesion, flexibility, and in its
meaning. The performance of mother and baby is both a piece of Swedish culture,
and a work of art with fascinating appeal for any attentive viewer. It is obvious that
the infant's ability at 5 months to attend to two songs in succession, which lasted
38 seconds, and 112 seconds, respectively, and to become involved so intensely and
so cleverly in the articulated sounds of her mother's voice has significance for
language acquisition. There is elaborate, well-organised narrative syntax here, and
the mother's Swedish is clearly pronounced, giving excellent exposure to the
characteristically rich vowels, which stand out in the spectrographs, especially at the
ends of phrases. The rhyming phonemes seem to tell the story all on their own!
Interest in the narrative experience and its communication is a human trait.
We know that, if she develops normally, the baby will be likely, within a few
weeks, to show evidence in vocalisations of identification with the phonology of this
particular "mother tongue", although it has to be admitted that she may have a
handicap in that she cannot match the sight of her mother's oral articulations with
the sounds that accompany them. On the other hand, her cortical auditory system
is probably hypertrophied at the expense of visual circuits, and she may be more
acute in her discrimination of the interpersonal messages of speech than most
infants her age would be.
What does this blind infant teach us? That humans are born with an intrinsic
sense of behavioural and experiential time adapted for sympathetic motivation
in imagination, for "mirroring" or "echoing" the motives in another's song. This
would appear to be a fundamental aptitude integrating both action and consciousness,
and leading to thought and language, as well as what is currently called "executive
functioning" and "working memory". This might be more appropriately seen as a
"narrative" functioning, which is concerned with imagination and its inrersubjective
transmission as much as with a single subject's cognitive execution, perceptual
learning and problem solving.
193
It is dear that infants are responsive to the musicality of maternal expression as part
of their elaborate adaptations to co-operate with and benefit from the strong
messages of care, concern and love that a mother presents. The Papouseks, who have
done much to reveal the nature of innate human musical skills, conclude that
the mother's "intuitive parenting" is the essential external stimulus to the child's
investigativemotivation and cognitive development, as well as being the regulator of
inner states of arousal and physiological maintenance (PapouSek and Papousek,
1977, 1981, 1987). Non-verbal patterns of protoconversations and games with
infants, which prove the shared sense of time between adult and infant, dearly serve
in cultural learning and, specifically, in the creative awareness and learning of
natural, conversational language (Papousek and Papousek, 1989). Daniel Stern has
pioneered a theory of the infants dynamic emotions, and how the mother helps
develop these into narratives of the experiencing self, giving the infant confirmation
ofconsciousness and the will to live by reflecting, or, as he puts it, "attuning to" the
inner transrnodal impulses of moving and noticing (Stern, 1985, 1990, 1993, 1999;
Stern et al., 1985). This is both a theory of the development of self-awareness, and
a formula for sensitive therapeutic practices that may support to development an
emotional health without verbal or cold-reasoned interpretation. Stern tends to
interpret the mother's joy-sharing role as arousing and constructive of the infant's
self-awareness. However, the infant takes the role of an active and creative partner
from the beginning, often inventing atrunements to what the parent does (Reddy,
1991).
The learning function of a child's personal "attachment" relationships and their
emotional basis is made dear by the way children use their communication to open
or dose channels for sharing of games, joint experiences and cooperative tasks with
different individuals. The making and keeping of friends in the family, as well as the
suspicious withdrawing from strangers ("unfamiliar" persons) is all part of the
machinery of motives that helps a baby pick up and practice knowledge of the
fabric of meanings in the home's "mini-culture" (Halliday, 1975; Trevarthen, 1984c,
1993a, 1990, 1998a; Reddy et al., 1997). Friendships continue to playa crucial
role in the setting up and growth of peer play, in which so much ofculture's wisdom
is assimilated from the society outside the family both before and after formal
schooling begins.
Thus, musicality is a part of the natural drive in human socio-cultural learning,
which begins in infancy. Toddlers and pre-school children often create and share
musical games- the "children's musical culture" (Bjerkvold, loco cit.). Clearly musical
communication develops in parallel with language. Together they constitute a
fundamental part of the human evolutionary endowment for cognitive growth in
culture, as has been argued by the Papoufeks (PapouSek and Papoufek, 1981;
Papousek, M., 1994; Papousek, H., 1996), Cross (1999) and Dissanayake (1999).
Musicality is fundamental to the effective communication of a teacher, and there
194
1'5
(18) A recent experimental study, motivated by the theory that an infant has to "construct" from
experience an awareness of the body, a "self-image", by learning to recognise the reafferent
sensations that are totally contingent on any movement initiated by the infant, has claimed that the
Double TV Replay test, does not (cannot?) show evidence of disturbance in the infant's behaviour
before about 3 months by non-contingent behaviour of a partner (Rochat et al., 1998).
Nevertheless, the findings of Murray and Trevarthen (1985) that two months olds are
immediately affected by the unpredictable reactionsof the replayed image of the mother have been
replicated (Nadel et al., 1999). It would appear that the constructivist view, basedon evidence from
experimental studies of infants preferential looking and Visually elicited manual activity, is too
swayed by the conspicuous changes in visual alertness and discrimination that follow early
maturation of the visual system. Development of visuo-spatial control is confused with acquisition
of core regulation in all modalities - a mistake Piaget made in his account of the development of
eye-hand coordination by reflex assembly, which overlooked neonatal prereaching (Piaget, 1953).
In fact, there is much evidence from the imitative behaviours and other dialogic interactions with
newborns, especially in relation to touch and vocal stimulation from another person, that infants
are born with prospective regulation of a moving "self-image", as well as certain precise
anticipations of the sympathetic effects of another person acting in response to the infant's
expressive movements - anticipations that constitute SrAten's "virtual other" (SrAten, loc. cit). In
196
Conversely, one can study what happens when the baby is prevented from being
expressive in an appropriately responsive way "in time" with the mother's feelings.
When a video recording of the baby's part in a live protoconversation by OTV is
replayed to the mother, she feelssomething is wrong, but usually does not realise the
actual cause. All indices of her affectionate identification with her infant go down
and she speaks as if the infant is a "thing", or projects her unsettled feelings onto the
infant (Murray and Trevarthen, 1986). Mother and baby must perceive each other
as making a live response in rhythmic sympathy for them to be at ease and
communicative. Both are trying to predict the course of their interaction, anticipating
satisfaction and pleasurable continuation. To do this they must share the pattern of
time generated in their movements - their IMPs must be synchronised.
These findings confirm the importance of innate emotional dynamics and
Coordinated Interpersonal liming (CIn for regulating interpersonal contacts by
"feed forward", and they have important clinical implications (Beebe et al., 1985;
Jaffe et al, 1999). They help us to understand why mothers who are depressed and
unable to mirror their infants' feelings lose musicality and cannot communicate
with their infants and make them happy, or sympathise appropriately when they
are distressed (see Robb, this volume, and Gratier, this volume); why the infants of
depressed mothers fail to thrive and cease to develop cognirively (Murray et al.,
1996), and why a mother with normal capacities for affectionate care of her baby
has trouble ifher baby is abnormal in emotional response or expression (Aitken and
Trevarthen, 1997). The findings confirm the evidence from infants' spontaneous
responses to mothers' speech and song and to rhythmic expressive behaviours of all
kinds. They are evidence for the vital function of motive-coupling or sympathetic
mirroring of emotions in human intersubjectiviry or "co-consciousness" (Tronick
and Weinberg, 1996).
the acoustic analyses of Malloch (this volume) the behaviour of the 2-month premature baby
interacting with the father's voice, and the vocal exchange recorded between the 6-week-old and
her mother illustrate this point well. The perturbation tests of Tronick (Tronick et al., 1978) and
Murray (Murray and Trevarthen, 1985) were undertaken fotlowing discovery of the efficiency of
protoconversational interactions with 2-month-olds (Trevarthen, 1998b).
197
19B
in which there are places to go and things to be done. It stimulates the need every
human being has for sympathetic company - for partners, and rivals, in moving,
noticing and understanding. The emotions or motivating qualities of a person's
acting and of being aware are shared by expressions of their every body part, but
most richly by the unaided singing of the voice. by the expressive movements of
the lips and tongue playing a wind instrument, and by the gestures of the hands
playing musical instruments. For the deaf, these same motive principles can be
transmitted and negotiated by the equivalent means of visible and tangible rhythms
of dance and gesture.
The power of music to heal becomes comprehensible when attention is given to
the vital function of intrinsically generated motor images, and the fluctuations of
emotion that validate our understanding of everything and every person 19.
199
:zoo
Bearen, S. (1996). When toddlers provide care: Infants' companion space. Childhood, 3(4), 449-
65.
Br1ren, S. (1998). Infanr learning by alterocentric participation: the reverse of egocentric
observation in autism. In S. Br1ren (ed), lnursubjtctivt communication anti emotion in
tarty ontogmy (pp. 105-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brazelton, T. B., Koslowski, B., & Main, M. (1974). The origins of reciprocity: The early
morher-infanr interaction, In M. Lewis and L. A. Rosenblum (eds), The tffict oftht
infant on its caTtgivtr (pp. 49-76). New Yorkand London: Wiley.
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possiblt worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culrurt oftducation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S., & Sherwood, V. (1975). Early rule structure: The case of peekaboo. In J. S. Bruner,
A. Jolly and K. Sylva(eds), Play: its rolein roolution and dtvtlopmmt. Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
Carruthers, P., & Smith, P. K. (1996). Tbeories of thtorits of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Chang, H. w., & Trehub, S. E. (1977a). Auditory processing of relational informarion by young
infants. Journal ofExptrimmtal Child Psychology, 24, 324-31.
Chang, W. B., & Trehub, S. E. (1977b). Infants' perception of temporal grouping in auditory
patterns. Child Development, 48, 1666-70.
Clarkson, M. G., & Clifton, R. K. (1985). Infanr pitch perception: Evidence for responding to
pirch categories and the missing fundamental. Journal of tht Acoustical Socitty of
America; 77, 1521-8.
Clarkson, M. G., Clifron, R. K., & Perris, E. E. (1988). Infanr timbre perception: Discrimination
of spectral envelopes. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 15-20.
Clynes, M. (1973). Sentia: biocybtrnttics of emotion communication. Annals of the New York
Academy of Science, 220.
Clynes, M. (1980). The communication of emotion: Theory of sentics, In R. Plurchick and
H. Kellerman (eds), Emotion: thtory. rtstarch and experience; ual.I, theories ofemotion.
New York: Academic Press.
Clynes, M. (1983). Expressive microstructire in music, linked to living qualities. In. J. Sundberg
(ed), Studits in music ptrformanct. Publication No. 19. Stockholm: Royal Swedish
Academy of Music.
Clynes, M., & Netrheim, N. (1982). The living qualiry of music: Neurobiologic basis of
communicating feeling. In M. Clynes (ed), Music, mind anti brain. Tbe nturopSJchology
ofmusic. New York/London: Plenum Press.
Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. S. (1974). Neonate movement is synchronized with adult speech:
Interactional participation and language acquisition, Science, 183,99-101.
Cross; I. (1999). Is music rhe most important rhing we ever did? Music, development and
evolution. In Suk Won-Yi (ed), Music, mind and science (pp. 10-29). Seoul: Seoul
National University Press.
Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridgt mcycloptdia of languagt, Stcond Edition. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Dtscants' error: emotion, reason and tb« human brain. New York:
Grosser/Putnam.
De Casper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: newborn prefer their mother's
voices. Science, 208, 1174-6.
201
:zo:z
Flowers, J. H. tt al. (1995). Musical versus visual graphs: cross-modal equivalence in perception
of time series data. Human Factors, 37(3), 553-69.
Fogel, A. (1977). Temporal organisation in mother-infant face-to-face interaction. In Schaffer (ed),
Srudits in mothtr-infant interaction: London/New York/San Francisco: Academic Press.
Fogel, A., & Hannan, T. E. (1985). Manual actions of nine- to fifreen-week-old human infants
during face-to-face interaction with their mothers. Child tUvtlopmtnt, 56. 1271-9.
Fraiberg, S. (1979). Blind infants and their mothers: an examination of the sign system. In
M. Bullowa (ed), Btfort spttch: tht btginning ofinterpersona! communication (pp, 321-
47). London: Cambridge Universiry Press.
Fraisse, P. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In D. Deutsch (ed), Tbepsychology ofmusic(pp. 149-80).
New York: Academic Press.
Fridman R. (1980). Proto-rhythms: Nonverbal to language and musical acquisition. In M. R. Key
(ed), The rtlationship ofvtrbal and non-vtrbal communication (pp, 77-91). New York,
The Hague: Mouton.
Freshaug, O. B., & Aahus, A. (1995). Whtn tb« moment sings: th« must within with Africa as a
mirror. Video by "Visions", Wergelandsvein, 23, 0167 Oslo, Norway (In Norwegian,
English, Spanish, Portuguese and French).
Frye, N. (1990). The koine of myth: Myth as a universally intelligible language. In R. D. Denham
(ed), Northrup Fryt, myth and metapbore. Stkcttd mays, 1974-1988 (pp, 3-17).
Charlottesville and London: Universiry Press of Virginia.
Gallisrel, C. R. (1980). The organization ofaction: a neu: synthesis. Hillsdale: N.J.:Erlbaum.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The tcological approach to uisua] perceptian. Boston: Houghton Mimin.
Gomez. J. C. (1998). Do concepts of inrersubjectiviry apply to non-human primates? In S. Braren
(ed), InttrSubjtctillt communication and emotion in tarly ontogtny (pp. 245-59).
Cambridge: Cambridge Universiry Press.
Grader, M. (1999). Expressions ofbtlonging: The tffict ofacculturation on tht rhythm and harmony
ofmothtr-infant lIocai interaction. (This volume).
Greiser, D. L., & Kuhl, P. K. (1988). Marernal speech to infants in a ronal language: Support for
universal prosodic fearures in motherese, Dtvtlopmtntal Psychology, 24, 14-20.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: explorations in th« deuelopmen» oflanguagt.
London: Edward Arnold.
Harris, P. L. (1998). Fictional absorbtion: emotional responses to make-believe. In S. Br~ten (ed),
InttrSubjtctillt communication and emotion in tarly ontogtny (pp, 336-53). Cambridge:
Cambridge Universiry Press.
Heimann, M. (1989). Neonatal imitation, gaze aversion, and mother-infant interaction. Infant
Bthalliourand Development; 12, 495-505.
Heimann, M., & Schaller, J. (1985). Imitative reactions among 14-21-day-old infants. Infant
Mtntal Hta[thJourna~ 6(1), 31-9.
Hess, W. R. (1954). Diencephalon: Autonomicand txtrapyramidal fUnctions. Orlando, FL: Grune
and Stratton.
Holsrege, G., Bandler, R., & Saper, C. B. (eds). (1997). Tbe emotionalmotorsysttm. Amsterdam:
Elsevier.
Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, c., & Jasnow, M. (1999). Rhythms ofdialogutin infancy:
coordinattd timing and social tUlltlopmtnt. Submitted to SRCD Monographs, February,
1999.
203
204
Maclean, P. D. (1970). The triune brain, emotion, and scientific bias. In F. O. Schmitt, (ed), The
Neurosceince StcondStudyProgram (pp. 336-49). New York: The Rockefeller University
Press.
Malloch, S. N. (1999). Mothm and infants and Communicativt Musicality. (This volume).
Malloch, S., Sharp, D., Campbell, D. M., Campbell, A. M., & Trevarthen, C. (1997). Measuring
the human voice: Analysing pitch, timing, loudness and voice quality in mother/infant
communication. Procudings oftht Institut« ofAcoustics, 19(5),495-500.
Mararos, O. (1982). Trends in development of imitation in early infancy. In T.G. Bever (ed),
Rrgmsions in mentaldevelopment: basic phmomma and thtorits (pp, 81-101). Hillsdale,
N.J.: Erlbaum.
Marler, P., Evans, C. S., & Hauser, M. C. (1992). Animal signals: Motivational, referential or
both? In H. Papouiek, U. JUrgens and M. Papouiek (eds), Nonlln'bal vocal communication:
comparativt and ekvtlopmmtal aspms (pp. 66-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press/Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme,
Martin, J. G. (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior.
Psychological Rroitws, 79(6), 487-509.
Mayer, N. K, & Tronick, E. Z. (1985). Mothers' rum-giving signals and infant rum-taking in
mother-infant interaction. In T. M. Field and N. A. Fox (eds), Social pm:tption in
infants. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Melen, M. (1999a). Les principes du mhn« et du diffirmt cornme organisateurs du groupement
rythmique chez le nourrisson. Arguments theoriques. Musicat Stientiae; IH(1), 41-66.
Melen, M. (1999b). Les principes du m;mt er du diffbmt cornme organisateurs du groupemem
rythmique chez le nourrisson. Une etude empirique, Musica« Scientia«; III(2), 161-91.
Melrzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. H. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gesrures by human
neonates. Science, 198, 75-8.
Melrzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. H. (1983). Newborn infants imitate adult facial gesrures. Child
Developmmt, 54, 702-9.
Melrzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. H. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early
Drotlopmmt and Parenting; 6, 179-92.
Melrzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. H. (1999). Persons and representation: Why infant imitation is
important for theories of human development. In J. Nadel and G. Butterworth (eds),
Imitation in infancy (pp. 9-35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merker, B. (1999). Synchronous chorusing and the origins of music (This volume).
Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulation of interactions between two-month-
olds and their mothers. In T. M. Field and N. A. Fox (eds), Social perceptio» in infants
(pp, 177-97). Norwood, N J: Ablex,
Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1986). The infant's role in mother-infant communications. Journal
ofChild Languagt, 13, 15-29.
Murray, L., Stanley, C., Hooper, R., King, E, & Fieri-Cowley, A. (1996). The role of infant
factors in postnatal depression and morher-infant interactions. DrotlopmmtalMtdicint
and ChildNrorology, 38, 109-19.
Nadel, J., Carchon, 1., Kervella, c, Marcelli, D., & Reserbar-Plantey, D. (1999). Expectancies for
social contingency in 2-monrh-olds. DrotlopmmtalScience, 2(2), 164-73.
O'Rahilly, R., & Muller, E (1994). The tmbryonic human brain: an atlas ofeUvtlopmantal stagts.
New York:Wiley-Liss.
205
:Z06
Trainor, L. J. (1996). Infant preferences for infant-directed versus non-infant-directed play songs
and lullabies. Infant Behavior and Development; 19, 83-92.
Trainor, L. J., & Zacharias, C. A. (1998). Infants prefer higher-pitched singing. Infant Behauiar
and Development; 21, 451-68.
Trehub, S. E. (1987). Infants' perception of musical patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 41(6),
635-41.
Trehub, S. E. (1990). The perception of musical patterns by human infants: The provision of
similar patterns by their parents. In M. A. Berkley and W. C. Stebbins (eds),
ComparatilJ~ perception: Wll. I, mechanisms (pp. 429-59). New York: Wiley.
Trehub, S. E., Bull, D., & Thorpe, L. A. (1984). Infants' perception of melodies: The role of
melodic contour. Child D~~lopmmt, 55, 821-30.
Trehub, S. E., Endman, M., & Thorpe, L. A. (1990). Infants' perception of timbre: Classification
of complex tones by spectral structure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49,
300-13.
Trehub, S. E., Schellenberg, G., & Hill, D. (1997). The origins of music perception and cognition:
A developmental perspective. In I. Deliege and J.A. Sloboda (eds), Perception and
cognition ofmusidpp. 103-28). Hove: PsychologyPress,
Trehub, S. E., & Thorpe, L. A. (1989). Infants' perception of rhythm. Categorization of auditory
sequenccs by temporal structure. Canadian JournalofPsychology, 43, 217-29.
Trehub, S. E., Thorpe, L. A., & Morrongiello, B. A. (1985). Infants' perception of melodies:
Changes in a single tone. Infant Behavior and Development; 8, 213-23.
Trehub, S. E., Thorpe, L. A., & Morrongiello, B. A. (1987). Organizational proccsses in infants'
perception of auditory patterns. Child Development; 58, 741-9.
Trehub, S. E., Trainor, L. J., & Unyk, A. M. (1993). Music and speech processing in the first year
oflife. AdlJanc~s In Child Druelopment and B~halJiour, 24, 1-35.
Trehub, S. E., Unyk, A. M., Kamenetsky, S. B., Hill, D. S., Trainor, L. J., Henderson, J. L., &
Saraza, M. (1997). Mothers' and fathers' singing to infants. D~IJ~lopmmtal Psychology,
33,500-7.
Trevarrhen, C. (1974). The psychobiology of speech development. In E. H. Lcnneberg (ed),
Languag~ and Brain: DevelopmentalAspect». Neuroscience: R~uarch Program Bulletin, 12,
570-85.
Trevarrhen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy. A description of
primary inrersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (ed), Bifort: sp~~ch: The b~ginning ofhuman
communication (pp. 321-47). London: Cambridge University Press.
Trevarrhen, C. (1984a). Biodynamic structures, cognitivecorrelatesof motive sets and development
of motives in infants. In W. Prinz and A. F. Saunders (eds), Cognition and motorproCtsIfS
(pp. 327-50). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer Verlag.
Trevarthen, C. (1984b). How control of movements develops. In H.T. A. Whiting (ed), Human
motoractions: Bernstein rt:asusud (pp, 223-61). Amsterdam: Elsevier (North Holland).
Trevarrhen, C. (1984c). Emotions in infancy: Regulators of contacts and relationships with
persons. In K. Scherer and P. Ekman (eds), ApproachfS to emotion (pp. 129-57).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trevarthen, C. (l986a). Development of intersubjective motor control in infants. In M. G. Wade
and H.T. A. Whiting (eds), Motor fkv~lopmmt in childrt:n: Asp~cts ofcoordination and
control(pp. 209-61). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijho£
209
:210
Trevarthen, C; Aitken, K., & Plooij, E X. (2000). Can age-related brain developments explain
behavioural "regressions" in infancy? (In preparation).
Trevarthen, C, Kokkinaki, T.. & Fiamenghi, G. A Jr. (1999). What infants' imitations communicate:
With mothers, with fathers and with peers. In J. Nadel and G. Butterworth (eds),
Imitation in infancy(pp, 127-85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trevarthen, c.. Murray, L.. & Hubley. P. A. (1981). Psychology of infants. In J. Davis and
J. Dobbing (eds), Scimtific foundations of clinicalpatdiatrics. 2nd td. (pp, 211-74).
London: Heinemann Medical.
Tronick, E. Z., Als, H., & Brazelton. T. B. (1980). Monadic phases: A structural descriptive analysis
of infant-mother face-rei-face interaction. Mtrri//-Palm" Quart"/y of Behauior and
Deuelopmou; 26, 1-24.
Tronick, E. Z.• Als, H .• Adamson, L.. Wise. 5., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant's response
to entrapment between contradictory messagesin face-to-face interaction. journal oftht
AmtricanAcadnny ofChiltJ Psychiatry. 17, 1-13.
Tronick, E. Z., & Weinberg, M. K. (1996). Depressed mothers and infants: failure to form dyadic
states of consciousness. In Murray and Cooper (eds), Postpartum tkprmion and chiltJ
development. New York/London: The Guilford Press.
Turner, E (1985). Natural classicism: mays on literamr« and science. New York: Paragon House.
Turner. E (1991). Btauty: tht valueofvalues. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Turner, E, & Peppel, E. (1988). Metered poetry, the brain, and time. In 1. Rentschler, B. Herzberger
and D. Epstein (eds), Btauty and tht brain: biological aspms ofamhttics (pp. 71-90).
Basel: Birkhauser,
van Rees, 5., & de Leeuw, R. (1987). Born too tarry: tht kangaroo mtthod with prtmaturt: babits.
Video by Stichting Lichaamsraal, Scheyvenhofweg 12, 6093 PR, Heythuysen, The
Netherlands.
von Hofsren, C. (1983). Developmental changes in the organization of prereaching movements.
Deuelopmenta! Psychology, 20, 378-88.
Wallin, N. (1991). Biomusicology: nturophysiological. nturopsychological. and eualutionary
ptrsptctivts on tht origins and purPOStS ofmusic. New York: Pendragon Press.
Weinberg, M. K., & Tronick, E. Z. (1994). Beyond the face: An empirical study of infant affective
configurations of facial. vocal, gestural and regulatory behaviors. ChiltJ Development;
65. 1503-15.
Whiten, A. (1991). Natural thtorits ofmind: euoiution, dtvtlopmmt and simulation oftVtryday
mindrt:ading. Oxford: Blackwell.
Whiting, H. T .A. (ed), (1984). Human motoractions: Bernstein rt:asmstd. Amsterdam: Elsevier
(North Holland).
Wigram. A.• & De Backer. J. (1999a). Clinical applications ofmusic thtrapy in dtvtlopmmtal
disability. patdiatricsand nturology. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Wigram, A.. & De Backer.J. (199%). Clinicalapplications ofmusicthtrapyin psychiatry. London:
Jessica Kingsley.
Wilson, R., & Keil, E (eds), (1999). The MIT mcycloptdia ofcognitivtsciences. Cambridge. MA:
MIT Press.
Wittmann. M .• & Poppel, E. (1999). Tempore! mechanisms of tht brain as fundammta/s of
communication - withsptcial rt:ftrmCt to musicperception andprrformanct. (This volume).
Zentner M. R.• & Kagan. J. (1996). Perception of music by infants. Nature, 383(6595), 29.
211
212
:213
115