Hemodynamic Monitoring Pocket Card
Hemodynamic Monitoring Pocket Card
www.nursingcenter.com
Hemodynamic Monitoring
Hemodynamic monitoring is a mainstay in the care of critically ill patients. It involves using invasive and
non-invasive methods to provide information about pump effectiveness, vascular capacity, blood
volume and tissue perfusion. The precise data obtained from hemodynamic monitoring helps to identify
the type and severity of shock (cardiogenic, hypovolemic, distributive, or obstructive). When paired with
clinical evaluation, hemodynamic monitoring is helpful in guiding the administration of fluids, in
selecting and titrating vasoactive drugs, and in deciding when mechanical support might be necessary to
treat refractory shock. It allows for evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment in real time.
Key Definitions
Definition Clinical Considerations
Cardiac output (CO) The volume of blood pumped Normal range is 4-8 L/minute.
through the heart per minute
(L/min) Calculation
CO = Stroke Volume (SV) X Heart Rate (HR)
Cardiac index (CI) CO adjusted for body surface Normal range is 2.8-4.2 L/min/m2.
area (BSA)
Calculation
CI = CO/BSA
March 2021
www.nursingcenter.com
Stroke volume (SV) The volume of blood pumped Normal range is 60-90 mL.
out of the left ventricle (LV)
per heartbeat Calculation
SV = End-diastolic volume (EDV) – end-
systolic volume (ESV)
End diastolic Volume of blood in the right Normal is about 120 mL.
volume (EDV) ventricle (RV) or LV at the end
of diastole (filling)
Central venous The blood pressure in the Used to assess preload and volume
pressure (CVP) vena cava and an estimate of status
right atrial pressure
Normal is 2-6 mm Hg.
Measuring Hemodynamics
Hemodynamic instability causes a mismatch between oxygen delivery and demand, leading to organ
failure. Hemodynamic instability can often be managed with regular clinical examination and monitoring
of vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate) and urine output.
However, when the patient does not improve or deteriorates further, invasive hemodynamic monitoring
is needed to guide fluid management and vasopressor/inotropic support.
Clinical Assessment
A clinical examination is the fastest and least invasive hemodynamic monitor available.
• A patient with inadequate global perfusion often presents with signs of organ dysfunction, such
as tachypnea, tachycardia, confusion, weak peripheral pulses, skin mottling, and oliguria.
March 2021
www.nursingcenter.com
• Capillary refill time (CRT) can be rapidly tested and is the time required for blood flow (and
color) to return to the distal capillaries after the release of fingertip compression sufficient to
cause blanching of the skin (10 seconds of compression time). The upper limit of normal is 3
seconds in adults; a longer CRT indicates reduced capillary perfusion.
Non-invasive Monitoring
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
• Heart rate is an important determinant of cardiac output (CO = HR X SV).
• A 12-lead ECG confirms cardiac rhythm and provides baseline information on ST segments and T
waves.
• Continuous monitoring of heart rate, rhythm and ST segments allows early recognition of
hypovolemia and myocardial ischemia.
• Tachyarrhythmias are a common finding in certain shock states. Bradycardia and/or heart block
may indicate cardiogenic shock.
Echocardiography
• An echocardiogram provides visualization of the cardiac chambers, valves, pericardium, and
overall cardiac function.
• It allows for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and estimates of SV and CO
based on measurement of LV outflow tract (LVOT), LVOT velocity and heart rate.
Fluid responsiveness
• Fluid resuscitation is a critical component of the treatment of hemodynamically unstable
patients. Although rapid optimization of volume status has been shown to improve outcomes,
volume overload is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.
• A fluid challenge is necessary to determine whether fluid administration will benefit the patient.
• Fluid responsiveness is frequently defined as an increase in cardiac output (≥ 10% from baseline)
with a fluid challenge (250-500 mL administered over 10-15 minutes).
March 2021
www.nursingcenter.com
• An alternative to a fluid challenge is to perform a ‘passive leg raise’ maneuver. This produces an
‘autotransfusion’ of blood from the venous compartments in the abdomen and lower limbs.
o Position the patient in the semi-recumbent position with the head and torso elevated at
45 degrees.
o Obtain a baseline blood pressure measurement.
o Lower the patient's upper body and head to the horizontal position and raise and hold
the legs at 45 degrees for one minute.
o Obtain subsequent blood pressure measurement.
o The expected response to this maneuver in those that are fluid responsive is a 10% or
greater increase in cardiac output (CO). Although not considered a validated measure,
we often use blood pressure as a surrogate marker of CO in evaluating response to the
PLR.
o Only patients who are fluid responsive after a fluid bolus or passive leg raise should
receive additional fluids.
Invasive Monitoring
Intra-arterial blood pressure
• Arterial cannulation (usually the radial artery) allows for accurate continuous blood pressure
measurement. Arterial line BP monitoring is the standard for care for patients on
vasopressor/inotrope infusions.
• Arterial lines facilitate frequent blood draws for blood gases or other lab studies.
References:
Bridges, E. (2017). Assessing Patients During Septic Shock Resuscitation. American Journal of Nursing, 117(10),
34-40. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000525851.44945.70
Bridges, E. (2013). Using Functional Hemodynamic Indicators to Guide Fluid Therapy. American Journal of Nursing, 113(5),
42-50. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000429754.15255.eb
Clement, R.P., Vos, J.J. & Scheeren, W.L. (2017). Minimally Invasive Cardiac Output Technologies in the ICU: Putting It All
Together. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 23(4), 302-309. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000417
Kerstens, M.K., Wijnberge, M., Geerts, B. F., Vlaar, A.P., & Veelo, D.P. (2018). Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring
techniques in the ICU. Netherlands Journal of Critical Care, 26(3), 104-110.
Marino, P. (2014). The ICU Book, 4th edition. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
Mikkelsen, M.E, Gaieski, D.F., & Johnson, N.J. (2020, September 28). Novel Tools for Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill
Patients with Shock. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/novel-tools-for-hemodynamic-monitoring-in-critically-
ill-patients- with-shock
Silvestry, F. (2020, July 15). Pulmonary Artery Catheterization: Interpretation of Hemodynamic Values and Waveforms in
Adults. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/pulmonary-artery-catheterization-interpretation-of-
hemodynamic-values-and- waveforms-in-adults