0% found this document useful (0 votes)
110 views

Eumind 1

This document contains a self-assessment rubric for student groups to evaluate their work on an Eumind project. The rubric includes criteria like layout, group introduction, preparation process, script quality, play quality on YouTube, communication evidence, cultural comparison, and reflection. Students score themselves and teachers provide feedback.

Uploaded by

api-385317557
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
110 views

Eumind 1

This document contains a self-assessment rubric for student groups to evaluate their work on an Eumind project. The rubric includes criteria like layout, group introduction, preparation process, script quality, play quality on YouTube, communication evidence, cultural comparison, and reflection. Students score themselves and teachers provide feedback.

Uploaded by

api-385317557
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

1

S SELF-ASSESSMENT
DEADLINE 1stOF FEBRUARY

SCORING
Eachgroupfillsouttheself-assessmentfortheirchosentopic.Studentsticktherelevant
boxesinthe‘done’columnandscorethemselves.Afterwards,theteacherscoresthestudents
anddecidedwhichgrouparenominatedforaCertificateofExcellence.

Pleaseonlyfilloutyourfirstnamesanduploadyourself-assessmenttoWeeblyinaseparate
folder/separatetab.

Scoring rubric:
1. VG = VeryGood
2. G =Good
3. S =Satisfactory
4. A =Acceptable
5. W =Weak

Fill in first names of students


St Mary’s High School SSC
Name of the school

Mishit
Group leader

Atharva
Student 1

Ali Abbas
Student 2

Jayden
Student 3

Ahmed
Student 4

Student 5 Asad

2
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N VG/G/S/A/W VG/G/S/A/W

Attractive 5p - Information is readable andclearly Y VG VG


layout presented

- Researchisdividedintodifferent
parts Y G G

- All documents arevisible


Y VG VG
- Multiple features of Weeblyhave
Y VG VG
beenused

Group 5p - The group has a short and Y VG VG


introduction attractive written/videointroduction

- Agroupphoto/camerashotis Y VG VG
added

- Personal information is shared Y VG VG


(hobbies,etc.)

- Incase the group used


Y VG VG
aYouTube video,‘Eumind’is
included in the title

The 10p - Were all elements included in Y VG VG


preparation the preparati on report?
and process
- How good is the quality of Y VG VG
the preparation report?

3
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N VG/G/S/A/W VG/G/S/A/W

25p - Howgoodisthequalityofthe Y VG VG
script?

The script - Areallelementscovered? Y G G

- Does the script clearly tell


somethingaboutthecultureand
habitsofthepartnercountry? Y G G

25p any- suggestions


Do you have Howgoodisthequalityofthe Y
for the Eumind projects? G G
play?
Please explain your ideas concisely.

The play - Doestheplayshoworiginality,


on YouTube creativity andhumor? Y VG VG

- Istheplaytechnicallywell
produced? Y VG VG

- Istheplaywellpresented? Y VG VG

Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is Y VG VG


communication added
 PicturesofZoom/WhatsApp
 ReflectiononVideo
Conferences isadded

Comparison 10p -Isthereagoodcomparisononthe Y G G


between your own show and the
showofthepartnercountry?

Reflection 10p - Howgoodisthequalityofthe


reflection? Y VG VG

- Haseachstudentwrittenan
individualreflection? Y VG VG
Total 100p

4
1. More video conference could be taken
2. More topic should be their
3. Innovative theme could add

You might also like