Syllabus in Legal Techniques and Logic
Syllabus in Legal Techniques and Logic
PROFESSOR:
DR./Atty. Glenn Reyes Luansing, DCL
State Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor General
Faculty (Law): University of Santo Tomas (Civil Law and Graduate School of
Law), University of the East, Far Eastern University, San Sebastian College,
VMUF, Bulacan State University, Lyceum University of the Philippines, Tarlac
State University, Universidad de Manila.
It is hoped that each student in class develops the following by the end of
each term:
1. Burden of Proof
- Penalber vs. Ramos 577 SCRA 509
- BOM vs OTA GR No 166097
- BOM vs. Torres GR
- Macayan vs. People G.R. No. 175842
- People vs Macaraig, 827 SCRA 43
- MOF Company vs Shin Brokerage 608 SCRA 521
- Cabigas v Limbaco GR 175291
- Tajonera v CA 103 SCRA 467
- Dacasin v CA G.R. No. L-32723
- PNB v CA and Chu Kim Kit GR L 43972
- VSD vs Uniwide Sale 684 SCRA 470
- Cordero vs BON G.R. No. 188646
2. Evidence
- Object evidence
- PP. vs. Taguba 342 SCRA 199
- PP. vs. Taan, 506 SCRA 219
- Documentary Evidence
- Tapayan vs Martinez GR 207786
- Country Bankers Insurance vs Lagman GR 165487
- Gaw vs Chua 551 SCRA 505
- Dantis vs Maghinang GR 191696
- GSIS vs CA GR 52080
3. Relevance and Admissibility
- People vs De Guzman 676 SCRA 347
- Espinelli vs People GR 179535
- Gumabon vs PNB GR 202514
- Mancol vs DBP GR No 204289
- Republic vs Gimenez GR 174673
4. Testimony of Witnesses and Hearsay
- People vs Taguibuya 658 SCRA 685
- People vs Ochoa 656 SCRA 382
- People vs Nunez GR 209342
- People vs Turco GR 137757
- Aliling vs People GR 230991
5. Expert Testimony
- Magsino vs Magsino GR 205333
- Lim vs CA GR 112229
- Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S., 509; 593–594
- Daubert Test in Forensic Evidence
- PP. vs. Yatar, 428 SCRA 504
- PP vs. Vallejo G.R. No. 144656.
- Herrera vs. Alba G.R. No. 148220
- Nunez vs. Cruz Apao 455 SCRA 288
- Garcilliano vs HRET GR 170338
- Ramirez vs CA GR 93833
- Disini vs Sect of Justice GR 203335
6. Dependence on Precedents
- Santiago vs Valenzuela 78 Phil 397
- Lambino vs COMELEC 505 SCRA 160
- Ting vs Ting 582 SCRA 694
- Lazatin vs Disierto 588 SCRA 285
- Pesca vs Pesca GR 136921
- Chong vs Sect of Labor 79 Phil 249
- Nielsen vs Lepanto Consolidated Mining 18 SCRA 1040
- Republic vs Nillas 512 SCRA 286
- CIR vs Insular Life Assurance GR 197192
- Republic vs UP GR 186635
- Almagro vs PAL GR 204803
1. Inductive Generalizations
- circumstantial evidence
- People vs. Bacerra GR 204544
- People vs. Pentecostes GR 226158
- People vs. Manabat GR 233199
- Franco vs .People GR 191188
- People vs. Pangan GR 193837
- People vs Paguntalan GR 116272
2. Evaluating Inductive Generalizations
3. Analogical Arguments
4. Evaluating Analogical Arguments
- IN RE:Emilio Gonzales OP case No. 10-J-460
- Batiquin v. Court of Appeals, 321 Phil. 965
- Garcia vs. Salvador, G.R. NO. 168512
- Marcos vs Manglapus GR 88211
- Estrada vs Disierto GR 146710-15
- Tawang Multi Purpose vs. La Trinindad Water GR 166471
- People vs Mojello GR 145566
- Ang LADLAD vs COMELEC GR 190582
- Magtoto vs Manguera GR L37201-02
- Bontilao vs Gerona GR 176675
- Kilosbayan vs Morato 246 SCRA 540
1. Rules of Collision