Crack Propagation Under Variable Amplitude Loading
Crack Propagation Under Variable Amplitude Loading
Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel Abbes, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria
b
Laboratory of Civil Engineering and Geo-Environment LGCgE, Faculty of Applied Sciences,
Artois University, Béthune, France
Experience shows that a damage induced by a given cycle is dependent on the loading history.
In this regard, the objective of this paper is to study and describe the phenomenology of the loading
history on crack propagation. Different loading configuration has been considered for fatigue crack
propagation of XC38 steel; overload cycles followed by underload and vice versa were considered
during propagation. Measure of crack opening has been made using compliance method. It is shown
that the main parameters which cause retardation are the residual compressive stresses and the crack
closure. The finite element modeling is used to calculate the evolution of residual stress profiles before
and after application of the overload-underload cycle. It corroborates the hypotheses on the mechanisms
behind, including those proposed on the residual stresses at the crack tip.
For a simple overload it is observed three different Furthermore, in the case of a high underload in
domains: compression applied before an overload (Puneder = Ppeak)
In stage one the crack advance with increasing number attenuates the delay of crack propagation.
of cycle N. The second stage corresponds on the application
of overload, the crack shows down for a certain number of 3.2. Evolution of crack growth rate da/dN as a
cycle Nd called number of delay cycles. After the end of the function of stress intensity factor amplitude ∆K
overloads effect, the crack advances normally. In Figure 3, we propose to study the phases of crack
In the case of an overloads followed by underload growth. It illustrates the evolution of the crack growth rate
when Punder = Pmax for an overload ratio τ = 1.7 it is observed da/dN as a function of the amplitude of the stress intensity
a decrease in retardation effect. factor ∆K. we note that after the application of an overload,
For a good comprehension of underload effect, we there is a crack arrest for a certain number of cycles
decided to make tests by varying the peak of underload as corresponding to retardation cycles Nd.
a function of the load when Punder = Ppeak. It is noticed that In terms of growth rate, this phenomenon results in
the application of a high underload following an overload instantaneous appearance of a “hook” putting into evidence
decreases significantly the number of delay cycles Nd. deceleration, which corresponds to an immediate delay.
The crack growth rate after an overload can be described
Table 1. Chemical composition of XC 38. by two stages:
Element C Mn Si P S
• When the growth rate decreases rapidly to reach a
minimum value noted (da/dN)min this zone highly
% 0.38 0.65 0.25 0.01 0.02
perturbed by the overload corresponds to a crack
length amin;
• The crack progresses in the plastic zone until it
Table 2. Mechanical properties of CX 38. reaches its initial value (da/dN)base.
E Re0.2 % Rm A Hv Y It should be noted here, that the low value of crack
GPa Mpa MPa % growth rate reached in the case of an overload for a
212 315 580 20 210 0.3 ration τ = 1.7, the minimum growth rate is about de 2.16
10-5 mm/cycle while its value 1.2 e-4 mm/cycle in the case
of an overload following by an underload where Punder = Ppeak.
Table 3. Different types of loadings. The growth rate increases when the ration of underload
increases its value becomes 1.36 e-4 mm/cycle.
Material Type of Ratio R Overload Underload
In this case, this high-intensity underload applied after
tests ratio ratio
an overload (Punder = Ppeak) two important phenomena re
Single produced:
XC38 0.1 1.7 1
overload
• After the application of an overload followed by an
XC38 Overload/ 0,1 1.70 –1.11 underload the crack growth rate decreases slightly;
XC38 underload 0,1 1.70 –1.70 • It reaches a growth rate higher than its initial growth
Underload/ rate then reaches a gain its initial growth after a certain
XC38 0,1 1.70 –1.70
overload number of cycles.
This can be explained by the residual tensile stresses progresses. Moreover, when the phenomenon of crack
induced by high applied underload. closure occurs, the load-strain curve P-δ shows a change
With a high underload applied before an overload (when in slope Figure 4.
Punder = Ppeak) eliminates the retardation of crack propagation. During the crack propagation, there is the appearance
Table 4 summarizes the different results for different of two distinct bridges on diagrams (P-δ), corresponding
loading type to show the difference in behavior betweens apparently to double opening Figures 5, 6 and 7.
thesis loadings. This double opening point was obtained regardless of
the position relative to the overload of underload.
3.3. Analysis in terms of crack closure
To measure the opening load Po a strip sensor has
been used. The principle is to measure the deformation of
the ligament of a specimen, in effect; this deformation is
linked to its rigidity. The latter is weakened when the crack
Figure 9. Evolution of the opening stress intensity Kop factor with Figure 11. Micro-hardness measuring positions.
crack length a.
Figure 18. Evolution of stress field during overload-underload Figure 20. Evolution of stress field during underload/ Overload.
(Time 1115).
5. Conclusion
The study presented in this paper aims to characterize
the crack propagation under variable loading. In this case,
all the cycles are either an overload/underload or underload/
Figure 19. Steps of loading applied to the numerical modelling overload type.
(underload/overload). The study has focused primarily on the influence of
both the overload underload ratios. Four types of loading
configurations were experimentally tested for the case of XC
of σyy during overload cycle and overload/underload 38 steel. Through the experimental investigation, we find
followed by underload and vice-versa. During overload cycle that for simple overload applied during constant amplitude
Figure 14 it is observed an increase compressive stresses loading causes a delay in crack propagation. Crack closure
(the increment 1105 that represents the propagation cycle is important in the case of single overload.
at the time of application of the overload), which are added If the tensile overload is followed by a compressive
to opening stresses resulting from unloading this delaying overload decreases the number of delay cycles, the material
the opening of the crack Figure 15. at the crack tip may undergo reverse plastic deformation and
this reduces the residual stresses.
If an underload cycle followed by an overload
The application of a high underload following an
cycle Figure 16 (the increment 1110 that represents the
overload decreases significantly the number of delay cycles
propagation cycle at the time of application of the underload) Nd. In this case the Crack closure is less important for the
residual stresses exist at crack tip but are less important case of overload/underload than that of single overload.
with respect to a single overload. It is noticed that for an We can conclude that the life time caused by a sequence
undreload applied after an overload decreases considerably of overload-underload and lower than that caused by simple
residual stresses Figure 17. overload.
In order to investigate the effect of an underload, the The measurements show that the residual compressive
underload ratio has been increased Figure 18. It is observed stresses and the crack closure are the major’s causes of delay.
1168 Abdelkader et al. Materials Research