Reclamation Manual: Subject: Purpose
Reclamation Manual: Subject: Purpose
Reclamation Manual
Directives and Standards
Purpose: To set forth the Bureau of Reclamation’s requirements for cost estimating
and ensure all cost estimates required by Reclamation’s mission are
effectively prepared and properly used. The benefits to Reclamation
include improved quality and consistency of cost estimates, the
facilitation of corporate oversight for these projects to support successful
project accomplishment, improved ability to maintain credibility with
water and power users and other customers, and otherwise sustain
Reclamation’s credibility.
2. Applicability. All Reclamation employees who prepare construction cost estimates (CCEs)
on behalf of Reclamation must comply with and implement the requirements of this D&S
and the associated policy document for cost estimating, FAC P09. These requirements
apply to all Reclamation program activities, Reclamation force account work, and services
for non-Reclamation clients as appropriate, but may not be germane to projects accepted
and administered by contract under Public Law 93-638 (refer to RM D&S, Requirements for
Execution and Administration of Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act
(Pub. L. 93-638, as amended) Contracts and Annual Funding Agreements (AFAs)
(NIA 10-01) for further direction). Various levels of cost estimates are required as a project
progresses through development phases such as planning (determining costs within an
authorized project), congressional authorization and appropriations, construction, and into
operation. Refer to RM D&S, Instructions on Budgeting for Construction – Estimates,
Schedules, and Supporting Documents (BGT 01-04) for how cost estimating supports
Reclamation’s construction program.
A. This D&S addresses six levels of cost estimates officially recognized and used to
support Reclamations programs and projects; these are:
(1) Preliminary
(2) Appraisal
(3) Feasibility
B. Cost estimates are typically developed in the chronological order shown above, and
each supersedes the previous one. They differ in degree of detail, refinement, use, and
confidence, and are dependent upon the amount of certainty contained in the available
engineering and geological data, and other factors (e.g., environmental considerations,
land acquisitions costs, and procurements methods) known at the time of preparation of
the cost estimates.
C. The sequencing of the various levels of cost estimates is standard; however, the
timeframe for these cost estimates within the various project stages may vary
depending on the project and its objectives. Because of program requirements and
management decisions, some levels of estimates may not be required. Refer to
Appendix A for a graphical presentation of various stages of a Reclamation project and
the associated levels of cost estimates.
(1) The Deputy Commissioner, Operations or their designee will provide oversight of
the Reclamation-wide cost estimating Policy, FAC P09, and the subsequent
D&Ss to ensure high quality cost estimates Reclamation-wide.
(2) Regional Director will designate appropriate staff to ensure cost estimates are
prepared in accordance with the associated Policy and D&S as well as other FAR
and acquisition requirements, update the project cost estimate (PCE) annually (if
appropriate), and maintain a chronological and comprehensive historical record of
all official cost estimates for their region
(3) The TSC will develop and promulgate all Reclamation-wide cost estimating
Policy/D&S/guidelines, prepare and publish Reclamations’ Construction Cost
Trends, prepare cost estimates and provide technical support to Reclamation and
non-Reclamation clients (as appropriate) such as:
(a) preparing or reviewing cost estimates and the designs upon which they are
based,
(b) providing cost evaluation services for bid review and cost proposal analysis
and negotiation, and
(c) preparing plant account and property class assignment reports for CCEs.
A. Within each status category, the project moves through various stages of development.
Six increasingly refined levels of costs estimates are produced as the project progresses
through these stages.
B. The following table identifies the official levels of estimates and displays where they
occur in the project development timeline. Appendix A presents this data graphically.
Feasibility
Operation and
Operations One or more of the previously identified estimates
Maintenance
C. The project stages and the cost estimates developed during that stage are described in
the following paragraphs:
(a) Preliminary Estimate. Preliminary cost estimates are prepared for studies
conducted at the very early stages of the planning process. They are
developed and produced to document a very preliminary analysis performed
to look at a given problem, need, or opportunity utilizing readily available
data. The estimates do not meet the criteria used for preparation of either
Appraisal or Feasibility cost estimates. While no minimum criteria or formal
standards exist for the development of the prices and costs associated with
this estimate level, sound estimating practices must be utilized in estimate
preparation. The estimates produced for these types of documents shall
identify and document at a minimum the items listed in RM D&S,
Representation and Referencing of Cost Estimates in Bureau of Reclamation
Documents Used for Planning, Design and Construction (FAC 09-03).
(ii) Appraisal cost estimates are not suitable for requesting project
authorization or construction fund appropriations from the Congress due
to the early stage of project development.
(i) A project feasibility study and feasibility-level cost estimate, which are
intended to support funding authorization for new construction, cannot
be conducted without authorization and appropriation of funds by the
Congress. This requirement is established in Section 8 of the Federal
Water Project Recreation Act of July 9, 1965 (Public Law 89-72). Once
the Congress appropriates funds for construction, typically at the
conclusion of the feasibility study, the planning status is complete.
(ii) The CCE and PCE will be at the feasibility level when used in support
of the request for initial appropriated construction funds. Because
feasibility investigations become the basis for the congressional action
on the project, the total PCE must be adequate to support the funding of
feasibility studies, the construction authorization, and the appropriations
ceiling established for the project. For information on completing the
CCE and PCE, refer to RM D&S, Construction Cost Estimates and
Project Cost Estimates (FAC 09-02).
(iii) The CCE and PCE must be completed prior to project authorization. If
language is included in the authorizing legislation allowing indexing
during construction, updating of costs to compute a funding
authorization ceiling will be performed in accordance with RM D&S,
Updating Construction Appropriation Authorization Estimates
(BGT 05-01). Refer to Paragraphs 9 and 10 of this document for
direction on indexing or re-pricing of cost estimates in support of the
CCE.
(a) Final Design Stage. Upon completion of the feasibility study, and after
authorization and appropriation of funds for construction, the final design
stage begins. Two levels of cost estimates are produced during the final
design stage of the project. These are the Percent [%] Final Design and the
Prevalidation. Percent [%] Final Design level estimates are produced as the
final design progresses through various percentage milestones of final
design, but all such estimates are considered to be Percent [%] Final Design
level estimates. A Prevalidation is produced at the end of the final design
stage just prior to issuance of a contract document.
(i) Percent [%] Final Design Estimates. 1 Percent [%] final design
estimates are estimates used to aid in the selection or refinement of the
preferred alternative or design, and to keep the Congress apprised of the
latest estimate of funding requirements prior to construction. They are
typically prepared after project authorization, during the early stages of
1
See “Final Design Process Guidelines” for definitions of final design milestones.
(b) Solicitation Stage. IGCEs are prepared to establish the estimated cost of
performing specific work called for in the bidding schedules of the
solicitation for a particular supply, equipment, or construction contract.
These estimates are prepared from final contractual and technical
specifications (including all amendments) and detailed drawings. They are
used to assess whether bids submitted by the offerors are fair, reasonable,
and acceptable.
(ii) IGCEs are prepared after careful review of the solicitation, including
specifications and drawings as well as any other pertinent information
including all published amendments. The IGCEs will be used for:
(3) Operation and Maintenance. When a project has moved into O&M Status, it is
considered to be at the Operations Stage. Cost estimates produced during the
Operations Stage of a project will follow the sequence of levels previously noted
as maintenance activities are planned, designed, and constructed.
(a) The PCE encompasses what is generally considered new construction and
other project costs and is closed out when the features are completed and
placed in a condition for satisfactory operation. The estimate will not be
reopened to include costs of minor additions, retirements, replacement,
reconstruction, abandonment, maintenance, or similar work that normally
takes place during O&M.
5. Key Elements of Cost Estimates. The following are key elements and fundamental
considerations in the preparation of cost estimates. Examples of a typical cost estimate
worksheet are contained in the Cost Estimating Handbook.
A. Pay Items.
(1) Pay items as used in estimates and in the bidding schedules of solicitations consist
of abbreviated descriptions of the elements of work for which payments or
charges to accounts are to be made. The pay items represent the most logical and
practical breakdown of the proposed scope of work into separate and distinct
classes of work.
(2) See the Cost Estimating Handbook for a listing of standard pay items for typical
features in Reclamation, including major and minor items of work.
B. Quantities. In preparing estimates, the quantities for the various pay items are
represented by a number and a unit of measure such as pounds, cubic yards, or another
unit that most appropriately represents the measurement for the particular pay item of
work.
C. Unit Prices. Unit prices include the various cost components for labor, materials, and
equipment necessary to perform the work designated in the various pay items for the
proposed scope of work. Current unit prices shall be used in all estimates, except in
those instances where actual contract bid prices are available (for the CCE only). Each
estimate shall be dated and reflect the price level (e.g., Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct and calendar
year) of the unit price data used therein. As an example, an estimate completed in
February 2005 reflects a price level of January 2005. Unit prices are not to be
increased to cover contingencies.
D. Field Data. The individuals responsible for collecting and providing design data
required by design staff (RM D&S, Design Activities (FAC 03-03)) shall also transmit
or provide any pertinent field data that might influence the cost estimate. Field data
shall include all information which may have a direct influence on the unit prices;
examples of this include duration of working season, climatic conditions, danger from
floods and other hazards, topographic conditions, geology of site, access limitations,
staging constraints, records of foundation explorations, nature and location of aggregate
deposits and sources of other building materials, kind of terrain over which materials
must be hauled, labor market, housing accommodations, utility interferences, right-of-
way constraints, operational outages, special taxes, local regulations which may impact
production and costs, and addressing public relations requirements.
E. Special Allowances. 2
(i) Unlisted items include minor items required to construct a project for
which it is not practical to develop designs and quantities during early
stages of a project.
(ii) Design and scope changes are intended to cover minor design
refinements which are not practical to anticipate early in the project but
typically arise as the project advances through final design. These are
typically associated with:
2
See the Cost Estimating Handbook for further information on each of these Special Allowances.
be informed by the project office of the need for this allowance and its
characteristics in order that a special line item can be added to the estimates
being prepared.
(a) Preliminary, appraisal, feasibility, and percent [%] final design estimates
shall include a percentage allowance for construction contingencies as a
separate item to cover minor differences in actual and estimated quantities,
unforeseeable difficulties at the site, changed site conditions, possible minor
changes in plans, and other uncertainties. Estimated quantities or unit prices
are not to be increased as a means for including construction contingencies.
The allowance used will be based on engineering judgment of the major pay
items in the estimate, reliability of the data, adequacy of the projected
quantities, and general knowledge of site conditions. The allowance will
vary inversely with the certainty of the engineering and geological
information and data. It is impractical to establish a fixed set of contingency
factors. The allowance for construction contingency normally ranges from
20 to 25 percent of the subtotal of all listed pay items including the
allowance for design contingencies and allowance for procurement
strategies.
F. Contract Cost. Refer to Paragraph 15.F. in this document for the definition of contract
cost. As more refined levels of designs are performed, a higher degree of confidence is
obtained for this line item.
G. Field Cost. Refer to Paragraph 15.J. in this document for the definition of field cost.
As more refined levels of designs are performed, a higher degree of confidence is
obtained for this line item.
H. Non-Contract Costs. Those offices with the responsibility for completion and
maintenance of the CCE shall include costs typically referred to as “non-contract”
costs. Non-contract costs refer to the costs of work or services provided in support of
the project, some of which can be expensed against a specific plant account, and other
work which is of such a broad non-specific nature that it can only be attributed to the
project as a whole. These latter costs are also referred to as “distributive costs.”
(1) Distributive cost items include but are not limited to facilitating services,
investigations, design and specifications, construction management,
environmental compliance, and archeological considerations. Refer to FAC 09-
02 for further information as to how these costs are to be formatted and shown
within the CCE.
(2) The project manager typically has the responsibility of ensuring that all non-
contract costs are recorded into the CCE and PCE.
J. Total Construction Cost. This value generally only appears in the CCE and PCE.
Refer to Paragraph 15.N. in this document for the definition of total construction cost.
K. Escalations.
(1) For projects that are to be developed over an extended period of time, or at some
distant time in the future, it is prudent that some consideration of the time value of
money be incorporated.
(2) Escalation for two distinct periods of time must be considered. First, the time
from when the estimate is prepared until notice to proceed, and second, the
duration of the construction contract. Depending on the nature of the authorizing
legislation, one of the following approaches shall be used to account for
escalation:
(a) For cost estimates being prepared for projects with written legislative
language to accommodate escalation prior to construction, as shown in BGT
05-01, the estimator shall account for escalation that may occur during
construction. These levels of estimates shall be prepared at the current price
level.
(b) For cost estimates (primarily preliminary, appraisal, feasibility, and percent
final design) being prepared for projects which have not or will not include
the legislative language discussed above, escalation for both periods noted
above shall be included (e.g., Safety of Dams construction projects and
O&M projects).
(3) For cost estimates at the Prevalidation and the IGCE levels, the unit pricing or
detailed pricing will consider escalation (i.e., escalation would be included in
each unit price) for the construction duration.
L. Rounding. For preliminary, appraisal, feasibility, and percent [%] final design level
cost estimates, the contract cost, field cost, and construction cost line items are rounded
to nominal values per the rounding guidelines contained in the Cost Estimating
Handbook. These nominal values are within 2.5 percent of the actual calculated values.
6. Special Studies. Special studies address a variety of activities that are required to make
responsible resource management decisions; they are primarily used to both assist future
planning efforts and provide specialized information that contributes to the decision-making
process. These reports are not used to propose to or request from the Congress an action or
decision, but can be used to document information requested by the Congress. Depending
on the intended use of the conclusions of the special study, estimates produced for these
studies shall be completed to the appropriate level as defined in Paragraph 4 of this
document.
A. General.
(1) Estimators shall be kept informed and involved in the total acquisition process.
The project manager shall determine the likelihood of a noncompetitive
procurement during the planning status. The CO, project manager, or designated
responsible party must inform the cost estimator during the final design stage and
prior to final design completion (see Appendix A), what procurement strategy and
process will be followed (i.e., competitive procurements (sealed bid), negotiated
procurements (contracts with the Small Business Administration under
Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act)), sole source procurements, and
modifications to existing contracts for the purpose of providing the cost estimate
with an appropriate amount of detail.
(i) The IGCE is prepared to reflect the “fair and reasonable” cost of the
scope of work as might be expected from bidding in “full and open
competition.” No specific allowances for contractor inefficiencies or
inexperience as a result of noncompetitive procurements are to be
included in the IGCE. This practice permits the CO to measure the cost
differences as a result of a noncompetitive procurement without
influencing their decision for award.
C. Developing the Cost Estimates. The two techniques commonly used to develop the
Prevalidation cost estimate and IGCE, unit price (historical) estimating and detailed
estimating, are described in the Cost Estimating Handbook. It is more efficient for the
estimator to use the same methodology to develop both estimates, which makes it
essential that the estimator be fully informed of the acquisition process and any project
issues that will influence the development of accurate pricing.
D. Handling.
(1) Prevalidations and IGCEs are sensitive documents with restrictions regarding
their availability and distribution. The Prevalidation is not to be disclosed prior to
bid opening to any person without a need to know without the approval and
facilitation of the CO. IGCEs are not to be publicly disclosed prior to bid
opening although they may be used administratively, before bid opening, to
project the effect of an award on the total estimated project cost, and on project
appropriation and repayment ceilings.
C. Special Considerations.
(1) IGCEs for contract modifications differ significantly from ones developed for
new contracts, due to the effects that existing requirements may have on the work
added and/or deleted by the modification, and due to the effects that the
modification may have on existing requirements. Refer to the Cost Estimating
Handbook for discretionary items to be considered by the estimator.
(2) The CO shall provide pertinent information to assist the cost estimator in
preparing the IGCE for the contract modification. In addition, the award
contractor’s general and administrative expenses allowance and any established
profit percentages must be provided by the CO, if known, to the cost estimator for
use in developing the IGCE.
(1) Cost indexes for construction are updated and published quarterly by the
Estimating Services Group (86-68170) and published on the Internet at
(2) Details of the process that may be used to generate the CCT indexes are described
in the Cost Estimating Handbook. Also shown in the handbook is an example of
the published cost trends data and a list of the property categories.
(3) The CCT index data is used by a second program in support of the Construction
Ceiling Appropriation. Information related to updating construction
appropriation authorization estimates can be found in BGT 05-01.
(4) This second program is also capable of generating projected CCT index numbers
by using the projected inflation numbers published by the Office of Management
and Budget. These projected indexes can be calculated for up to a 4-year period
from the current CCT quarter. The standard practice is to restrict access to the
projected indexes to internal use only.
B. Re-Pricing.
(1) Re-pricing (re-estimating) is the most accurate method for determining current
construction bid values for a specific project. The index values within the CCT
are intended to reflect the change in dollar value for construction work. Because
of a number of significant considerations, this is not the same as determining the
current bid value for similar construction at a specific location. The two
alternatives are not comparable for several reasons which are:
(a) Source. Unit prices are developed for specific construction work taking into
account many factors such as local material prices, local wage rates, and
economic conditions. Cost indexes are based on historical indicators, which
may not show local variations in costs nor reflect uncertainty and
competition. Thus, in any given area, the indexed value may not show the
local trend in costs.
(b) Inflation. Because of the methods used to develop cost indexes, the index
values will lag actual price escalations during periods of high inflation. The
current quarterly indexes of the CCT do not contain any consideration for
recent or projected adjustments that would be required during high
inflationary periods; thus, re-pricing is the much better approach to
determine accurate market values.
(d) Legal. Laws that have been passed since the original estimate was produced
may require additional work or practices to be followed in construction pay
items. These current costs are added to bid prices and appear in unit prices
in estimates but cannot be accounted for in preparation of indexes which are
for general classes or features of work. As these requirements are added to
construction, the indexed value will fall farther behind the unit prices.
(2) Considering all of these factors causing indexed values to deviate from current
prices, cost estimates shall be re-priced at least once every 5 years rather than
risking an underestimate caused by indexing.
A. The amount authorized for each project is derived from the PCE contained in the
feasibility report that was submitted to support the authorizing legislation. Estimates
must include sufficient details on each of the project features to classify the field costs
according to available indexes for such items as land and rights, dams, canals, laterals,
etc.; and further determine the preauthorization cost and the percentage of non-contract
costs. Such an authorizing estimate and plant account cost classification is necessary to
complete the appropriation ceiling indexing process.
B. Refer to BGT 05-01 for the methodology required for calculating appropriation ceiling
adjustments.
11. Safety of Dams Cost Estimates. In support of the Dam Safety Program, cost estimates will
be prepared at various stages of planning through construction. The Dam Safety Office
prepares a Modification Report, which is used to seek authorization from the Congress for
construction of modifications to Reclamation facilities. The cost estimate that will be used
for the Modification Report will be at the feasibility level. Appraisal level cost estimates
will only be used during the scoping stages of the Corrective Action Study to identify which
alternative(s) will be estimated at the feasibility level.
A. In addition to the normal feasibility level cost estimates that are prepared, at least one
feasibility level cost estimate for each design alternative is required to consider risks
that may affect construction costs of the project. These risks need to be defined for
such items as potential design changes, construction considerations, and any other
factors that may affect costs associated with construction contract. For example,
additional design data or refined analysis during final design may result in design
changes that affect costs. Additionally, constraints (environmental, local conditions,
facility operations, material sources, etc.) placed on a project during construction will
likely affect costs.
B. Refer to RM D&S, Bureau of Reclamation Dam Safety Program (FAC 06-01) and
Safety of Dams Modification Reports for Submission to the Congress (FAC 06-03) for
information regarding the cost estimate requirements of the Dam Safety Program.
12. Operation and Maintenance Estimates. Cost estimates are required during the budget
planning stages for most O&M activities, particularly major rehabilitation and replacement
(MR&R) items. During the budget planning stages, preliminary, appraisal, and feasibility
level cost estimates will be used for determining the required budget for construction,
supply, and services. Refer to BGT 01-05 for information regarding the required cost
estimates.
A. The first milestone or lowest level of budget planning that is typically encountered
would be at the 4 or more out year(s) budget. The project is not well defined at this
time and has not been incorporated in any Reclamation budget documents. Costs are
typically generated using experience from previous projects and may not be formally
prepared. The cost estimate that is prepared for this milestone is typically at a
preliminary estimate level. At this time, the appropriate office will be defining the
required MR&R project work to be performed at some time in the future.
B. The second milestone is at the current budget year plus 3 years for award of a
construction contract. This information is developed for use in budget planning
documentation required for Reclamation’s Budget Review Committee (BRC). The
cost estimate that is prepared for this milestone is at an appraisal level. Typically,
drawings, sketches, and/or general layouts are prepared for this level of cost estimate.
Sufficient backup materials along with the appraisal level cost estimates will be
provided to the BRC for their evaluation and review. Consideration must be given to
preparing feasibility level cost estimates (in lieu of appraisal) for projects or features
that either present unique requirements or are in excess of $10 million total
construction cost.
C. Higher priority MR&R items are typically designated for final design. At that time, the
construction, supply, or service contracts will follow the normal design process
providing appropriate cost estimates at the required milestones.
A. Internal Reviews. Cost estimates prepared within Reclamation will be reviewed per
the established policies and procedures of the offices preparing the estimates. It is
recommended that estimates be reviewed for a comprehensive inclusion of all known
required work items, accurate pay quantities, sound price development, and appropriate
special allowances. Special attention shall be given to major cost drivers, work items
having high levels of risk, and anticipated noncompetitive procurements. Refer to RM
D&S, Identifying Design, Cost Estimating, and Construction Projects for Which
Independent Oversight Review is Required, and Performing Those Reviews
(FAC 10-01) for information regarding independent reviews of Reclamation cost
estimates. The TSC is available to assist with these internal reviews.
(1) Cost estimates for Reclamation projects and the designs upon which they are
based are sometimes prepared by entities outside of Reclamation (i.e.,
Architect/Engineer, Consultant, etc.). In such situations, the outside entity who
prepares these products is responsible for the technical adequacy of their designs
and the accuracy of the associated cost estimates.
(a) For projects which meet the criteria for review by the DEC Oversight Office
(as outlined in FAC 10-01), the project design and cost estimate shall be
independently reviewed in accordance with the provisions of that D&S.
(b) The agreement with the outside entity whose estimate is to be reviewed in
accordance with the provisions of FAC 10-01 shall include provisions to
supply the following data to facilitate Reclamation’s review:
(i) Detailed design drawings, design data, quantity estimates, and quantity
estimate worksheets must be provided which clearly illustrate the nature
and scope of the project components.
(ii) All supporting information for estimate assumptions for the bid items
and unit prices that make up the cost estimate must be included. Lump
sums shall be broken down into component parts so that the reviewer(s)
can understand at the cost element level the work requirements
contained within.
(iii) Major cost drivers in the cost estimate (defined as those project
components which make up significant percentage of the construction
cost) must be supported by full understanding of the development of the
unit prices and/or lump sums with price quotes (if available) or the cost
reference where the cost were obtained.
(1) Cost estimators are expected to have a full and open exchange of data regarding
the design, construction, and procurement methodologies applicable to the project
upon which they are working. This exchange of information benefits not only the
estimator but also the design staff and procurement officials. However, in the
actual preparation of the cost estimates, the estimating staff is expected to work
independently of the designers (if resources are available), procurement officials,
and potentially competing contractors, as possible, to eliminate any real or
perceived influence or conflict of interest in the preparation of the cost estimate.
(2) Cost estimators must receive appropriate training in cost estimating procedures;
be knowledgeable in construction methodologies and contracting procedures; and
be able to determine current cost conditions as they impact the development of
the CCEs.
Therefore, the level of cost estimate generated for value study alternatives/proposals
will typically be no better than an appraisal level cost estimate. As a result, these cost
estimates shall not be used for any purpose other than evaluating costs for design and
construction alternatives/proposals relative to the baseline cost estimate. Should an
alternative/proposal be selected from this process, the design will need to be refined
and the cost estimate prepared with enough time, resources, and detail as appropriate.
15. Definitions.
(1) The CCE consists of the costs of the construction of the physical features of the
project (i.e., contract costs), the land and rights, relocation of existing real
property, clearing and restoring lands, service facilities, investigations,
engineering (preparation of design and specifications, construction management,
and contract administration), and other general expenses. A CCE is first
developed in the planning stage of a project and maintained through subsequent
stages of the project completion. The costs included in the CCE at any stage of
the project will include a combination of actual expenditures for work completed
to date and estimated costs for all remaining work.
(2) A CCE will contain cost details such as listings of work item details required to
construct various features. These details may include work or materials
descriptions, units of measure, and unit pricing, along with line items for design
contingencies and construction contingencies. See Paragraph 5.E.(1) and (3) for
more information on design and construction contingencies.
E. Construction Cost Trends or CCT. Cost indices for construction are updated and
published for use throughout Reclamation. The indices are prepared for the major
features involved in Reclamation construction work. These features are described in
the Cost Estimating Handbook, which contains discretionary guidance.
F. Contract Cost. The contract cost is intended to represent the estimated cost of the
contract at time of bid or award. This value will include allowances for design
contingencies and for procurement strategies, but not construction contingencies.
G. Cost Estimate. A cost estimate identifies the expected financial obligations, which
may be incurred for the development and support of various project features and
programs associated with Reclamation’s mission. The key elements of Reclamation’s
cost estimates are detailed in Paragraph 5.
H. Distributive Costs. Distributive costs refer to that portion of the non-contract costs
which is of such a broad non-specific nature that it can only be attributed to the project
as a whole. These costs are eventually proportionately allocated to specific plant
accounts and property classes. See Paragraph 5.H. of this document and FAC 09-02
for further discussions of distributive costs.
I. Feature Construction Cost. The construction cost associated with a unique feature on
a cost estimate worksheet is the sum of item costs and includes allowances for design
contingency, procurement strategy, construction contingency, and non-contract costs.
(NOTE: This term and associated definition is offered and applicable to use on the
typical Reclamation Cost Estimate Worksheet. It is not synonymous and must not be
confused with the Total Construction Cost as developed for a CCE and PCE as defined
elsewhere in this release.)
J. Field Cost. The field cost is an estimate of the capital costs of a feature or project from
award to construction closeout. The field cost equals the contract cost plus
construction contingencies. Construction contingencies are intended to account for
costs resulting from changes in designs and/or differing site conditions encountered
during construction. Non-contract costs are not included in this value.
K. Non-contract Costs. Non-contract costs refer to the costs of work or services provided
by Reclamation staff and/or service contractors in support of the project. See
Paragraph 5.H. of this document and FAC 09-02 for further discussions of non-contract
costs.
line item. Whereas a program’s timeframe may continue past any individual project,
each project usually results in a unique product. Examples of some Reclamation
programs are the Dam Safety Program and the Title 16 Program.
(1) The PCE is a summary of the costs found in the CCE. Information on the PCE
does not extend below the plant account level of the identified property. It is used
in planning reports, in seeking congressional authorization, and in support of
requests for construction appropriations.
(2) After construction begins, PCEs are updated once annually (March/April), in
conjunction with updated CCEs, or as required, to support budget and program
schedules submitted for future fiscal years.
N. Total Construction Cost. For the purpose of completing the PCE, a total construction
cost is calculated for each property class attributable to the project. A total
construction cost consists of a sum of the construction cost for each feature within a
property class. In general, a construction cost is a sum of the total field costs plus non-
contract costs. Within the PCE, the summation of all the property class total
construction cost line items is equivalent to the total project cost.
O. Total Project Cost. For the purpose of completing the CCE and PCE, the total project
cost consists of the summation of the total construction cost values for the various
property classes within a project.
16. Review Period. The originating office will review this release every 4 years.
09/12/2019 321
Effective Date: Release No.
Ensure all employees needing this information are provided a copy of this release.
Summary of Changes
Minor revisions include:
1. Minor wording revisions throughout the document
2. Added a definition for a new term “Feature Construction Cost"
3. Deleted the definition for “Cost Authority"
4. Rearranged sections moving “Sequence of Development of Cost Estimates” section prior to the section on “Key Elements of Cost Estimates” to
improve the readability of the document
5. Revised definition for “Authorized Project” per CMP TRMR-72 Authorized Project per request from Policy and Administration (Policy) Office
6. Revised RAX citations to MR&R references per request of the Policy Office
7. Deleted references to work done by contractors on Reclamation products
8. Updated website links in the document for current locations on the Cost Estimating website
9. Revised numerous titles of other referenced RM documents within the document
10. Reformatted this D&S document per the newly revised RM document formatting requirements. Moved the Definitions section towards the end
of the document. Added a section on the Review Period for future certification reviews for this document
NOTE: This Reclamation Manual release applies to all Reclamation employees. When an exclusive bargaining unit exists, changes to this
release may be subject to the provisions of collective bargaining agreements.
Filing instructions