UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD FORM MS (2010/11)

MODULE SPECIFICATION

A blank pro forma can be downloaded from http://www.governance.salford.ac.uk/page/aqa_forms

Date of completion of this version of Module Specification August 2011

Date of approval by the Programme Approval and Review Sub-committee:

Module Title: CRN:

Bridge Engineering 32900

i
University module code: HESA/JACS subject area code :

SG-H210-M0??-?? H223T/H22HT/H223D/H22HD/HK21

ii iii iv
Level : Credit Value : ECTS Value : Length (in Semester(s) in which to
v
7 30 15 Semesters) be offered:
1 2
vii
Title of Module being replaced (if any): With effect from :
Existing module New September 2012
vi
New module

Originating School: Module Co-ordinator(s)

Computing, Science & Dr.L.Weekes
Engineering

Programme(s) in which to be offered:

MSc/PgDip Structural Engineering

M.Eng Civil and Architectural Engineering

Pre-requisites (between levels): Co-requisites (within a level):

None None
viii
Indicative learning hours: Percentage taught by School(s) other than originating School :
300 Nil

Aims of Module:

To enable students to demonstrate:

• a comprehansive practical ability to undertake design and analysis of bridge structures with
regard to structural form, materials and specific loading,
• critical awareness of cutting edge technologies used in transport infrastructure combined with
application of original work to generate a comprehensive understanding of the subject,
• an ability to deal with incomplete data and work autonomously at a professional level to solve
open-ended design problems.

Intended Learning Outcomes

Knowledge and Understanding

On completion of the module the student should be able to:

1 Undertake original design of structures specifically related to bridges (abutments, bearings,
cables, beams, trusses and decks.)
2 Generate and critically evaluate the output from various structural analysis methods related to
bridge structures, using relevant IT resources.

Transferable/Key Skills and other attributes

3 Problem solving skills acquired by way of tutorial examples and assignments.

4 Numeracy skills acquired by way of mathematical analysis in tutorial examples and
assignments.
5 Improvements in learning and performance by way of time management in private study, tutorial
exercises, use of library, It resources and other sources of supplementary learning material.
6 Improved communication and time management skills by way of preparing and discussing
assignments whilst working in groups.
7 Improvement of IT skills by way of using current software to undertake analysis, design, data
processing and document preparation.
8 Ability to act autonomously in the planning and implementing of tasks at professional level.
9 Ability to deal with complex issues, systematically and creatively by using competent judgement
in the absence of complete data.
10 Exercise personal initiative and responsibility.
11 Critical awareness of current professional practice.
ix
Module mark calculation: Method A

Assessment components (in chronological order of submission/examination date)

Denote final assessment component in box marked final assessment component (99)
Duration Word count (if Component pass
x
Type of assessment Weighting% (if exam) essay/dissertation): requiredxi
Design Exercise 50 Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No
Final assessment
component (99)
50 2.5 hours Yes No
Examination

xii
Learning and teaching strategies :

Learning will be derived from lectures and design studio work, supported by tutorials and computer
laboratory classes. Visual aids and demonstrations will be used as appropriate and students will be
encouraged to ask questions and to take part in short discussions within the lecture context.
Assessment will be equally split between an unseen end examination and a design exercise.
The examination will be an open book, technical design assessment.
The design exercise will require small groups of students to produce conceptual options which
address a unique and challenging client brief, critically evaluate and detail design a scheme. It will
create an opportunity for students to synthesise knowledge from the entire syllabus, develop
interpersonal and time management skills and prepare themselves for a career in industry. The final
output may be a combination of written report, drawings, sketches, poster, oral presentation,
computer model or physical model. Students will be encouraged to develop designs under staff
supervision in the Design Studio environment.

Learning outcomes 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 will be addressed by the Design Exercise, the remaining
learning outcomes will be addressed by the Examination.
 Syllabus outline:

Detailed design of bridge elements in steel, concrete and other materials such as timber and
masonry. Design of abutments, bearings, cables, beams, trusses etc.

Prestressed concrete deterrminate and indeterminate systems, arches, integral bridges, cable
stayed and suspension bridges.

Issues of durability and sustainability.

Analysis methods relating to bridge structures, influence lines and surfaces, grillage analysis, Finite
Element Analysis of bridge decks and assemblies.

xiii
Indicative texts and/or other learning materials/resources ;

Gottemoeller, F. (1998) Bridgescape: The Art of Designing Bridges. Chichester: Wiley

nd
Hambly, E.C. (1991) Bridge Deck Behaviour, 2 Edition. London: E&FN Spon.
O'Brien, E & Keogh, D.L. (1999) Bridge Deck Analysis. London: Spon,
Parke, G.A.R & Hewson, N. (Eds). (2010) ICE Manual of Bridge Engineering. London: Thomas
Telford Publishing.
nd
Ryall, M.J. (2010) Bridge Management, 2 Edition. Oxford: Butterworth Heinmann.

i
see UoS guidance notes on selecting JACS codes (http://www.planning.salford.ac.uk/jacs_codes/)
see HESA JACS Codes webpage http://www.hesa.ac.uk/index.php/content/view/356/233/
ii
indicate level 3,4,5,6,7
iii
permissible credit values are set out in Academic Regulations 3.1.3 to 3.1.5
iv
European Credit Transfer System: 2 Salford Credits = 1 ECTS credit
v
indicate 0.5, 1, 1.5 or 2, subject to permissible module shapes in Academic Regulations 3.1.8/9
vi
check one box as applicable
vii
insert month and year of first/next delivery of module
viii
identify all participating Schools other than Originating School
ix
delete as applicable; refer to Academic Regulations 8.5. Where applicable, indicate where both
methods are used, i.e. where module is delivered to students of more than one programme and at
least one requires Method B for PRSB reasons
x
please indicate, in chronological order of submission date, each assessment component by type, e.g.
examination, oral, coursework, project, dissertation; denote final assessment component in box
marked Final assessment component (99)
xi
if Method B is used for module mark calculation, indicate Yes to specify the assessment
component(s) to be passed in order to pass the module
xii refers to the choice and range of teaching activities which are most appropriate in creating learning
experiences which help students to achieve the module’s learning outcomes and develop
transferable skills; issues of equality, diversity and accessibility must also be given full consideration
xiii the “Indicative texts and/or learning materials/resources” box should include a maximum of 5 items
for new modules; for existing modules the box should include a link for PARSC reviewers and
readers to the comprehensive reading list at http://lasu.salford.ac.uk