Week 3 - MODULE - BFinance
Week 3 - MODULE - BFinance
Module 1
Topic 2 Foundations of Finance II
Name:
Course/Year:
I. Learning Activities
2.1 RISK and RETURN for INDIVIDUAL ASSETS
The mean return is our best estimate of the true distributional expected
value of returns. The sample variance of returns is:
𝑛
1
2.2 𝑠𝑖2 ∑ (𝑅𝑖,𝑡 − 𝑅̅𝑖 )2
𝑛−1
𝑡=1
The sample standard deviation of returns is:
2
2.3 𝑆𝑖 = √𝑆 𝑖
• Sample variance and sample standard deviation are estimates of the
true distributional variance and deviation.
• These measures for mean return and risk, the investor can make risk-
return trade-off comparisons.
Standard Deviation of
Expected Return
Returns
High Tech (HT) 15% 30%
Low Tech (LT) 8% 10%
Risk-free Asset (RF) 4% 0%
Correlation between HT and LT -0.10
Correlation between HT and RF 0
Correlation between LT and RF 0
✓ High Tech has the highest expected return of 15% but also the highest
variability in returns of 8% and variability of 10%. The risk-free asset
provides a low, but risk-free return of 4%.
✓ The returns to High Tech and Low Tech are negatively correlated.
✓ The risk-free asset’s returns are certain and uncorrelated with the other
asset’s returns
✓ Zero variability in returns is what is meant by risk-free investment
✓ Now, using the formula given. Suppose you put 40% of your funds in High
Tech and 60% in Low Tech. The expected return for the portfolio is:
𝐸 (𝑅𝑃 ) = 0.40(0.15) + 0.60(0.08) = 0.108
✓ And the variance of portfolio returns is:
Moreover, if there are many stocks to choose from, how much should we invest in
each? Here is where the efficient set comes in. We begin with figure 2.1 below:
Figure 2.1
✓ Figure 2.1 depicts all possible risk-return combinations of High Tech and
Low Tech.
✓ The curve in the figure is constructed by varying the weights for each asset
and recalculating the expected return and standard deviation.
✓ The curvature of this relationship stems from the correlation between the two
securities: the lower the correlation, the greater the curvature
Figure 2.2
✓ Figure 2.2 shows that investors actually have thousands of risky investment
opportunities.
✓ So, if we consider all combinations of securities, it can be shown that a graph
depicting all these combinations would show a solid curved mass which is
sometimes compared to a “bullet.”
✓ With the figure 2.2, notice that several individual investments (A-D) and
several portfolios (E-G) are shown.
✓ In the manner of Figure 2.1, if we combine individual investments on a
pairwise basis, we achieve diversification as reflected in the risk-return trade
Page 4 of 7
Behavioral Finance
off curves.
✓ By mixing together, we can do even better. Because, when we have moved
as far as to the left as possible in all portfolios, we have reached the “skin”
of the bullet.
✓ Above to the right of the minimum risk point is the curve we called “efficient
frontier”
Page 5 of 7
Behavioral Finance
II. Assessment
Activity 2.1
Define the following terms in your own
definitions.
1. Systematic and Nonsystematic Risk
2. Beta and Standard Deviation
3. Direct and Indirect Agency Costs
4. Weak, Sem-strong, and Strong Form Market Efficiency
Activity 2.2
1. Angelique Alvaro has been a very successful investor. Now, she’s
interested in investing in the Technology sector. Their portfolio
contains the following:
• Lazo Inc., P500, 000 invested and an expected return of 15%
• Viste Inc. P200, 000 invested and an expected return of 6%
• Acosta Inc P300, 000 invested and an expected return of 9%
With a total portfolio value of P1 Million, the weights of Lazo,
Viste, and Acosta in the portfolio are 50%, 20% and 30%
respectively.
a. What is the total expected return of the portfolio?
b. Which stock is riskier?
Page 6 of 7
Behavioral Finance
III. References
Page 7 of 7