Time-Cost Trade-Off
Time-Cost Trade-Off
Project management is one of the most significant parts of the construction industry. It
involves various factors and considerations in which total projects’ cost and the duration of
construction are included. With these, Time-Cost Trade-Off had become an effective tool in
building a project using an optimal schedule that leads to minimum cost. In this paper, further
explanation and illustration of the significance of time-cost trade-off in real life situations had
been presented to gives an even deeper understanding regarding the subject matter. Graphical
illustrations of the relationship between the direct and indirect cost as well as the duration of
construction were laid-off in addition to the construction of project network and utilization of the
critical path method (CPM). Scheduling and analytical computation were used to identify the
most cost-effective duration of construction.
INTRODUCTION
Construction industry has been playing a vital role in every country’s sustainable
development toward further economic advancement. It usually serves as a backbone of economic
growth with various building structures as tangible proofs. With the continuous innovation of
construction industry, a nation will be able to catch up with the ever increasing demands and
necessity of humanity when it comes to shelter and other structural needs. The construction
industry is regarded as one of the most important sources of national economic growth and
development wherein construction operations are catalyst for achieving the nation's socio-
economic development goals of providing housing, infrastructure, and jobs. With these, citizens’
healthy environment will be assured, and thus the best working conditions for performing
various tasks. At the same time, it generates a large number of job openings which will cause
potential impact to the growth of the national economy.
I. OBJECTIVES
to reduce the original project duration,
to form the critical path analysis,
to meet a specific deadline, with the least cost.
II. WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO FINISH THE PROJECT ON TIME?
Finish the project in a predefined deadline date.
Recover early delays.
Avoid liquidated damages.
Free key resources early for other projects.
Avoid adverse weather conditions that might affect productivity.
Receive an early completion-bonus.
Improve project cash flow
III. ACTIVITY TIME-COST RELATIONSHIP
In general, there is a trade-off between the time and the direct cost to complete an
activity; the less expensive the resources, the larger duration they take to complete an
activity. Shortening the duration on an activity will normally increase its direct cost.
It should never be assumed that the quantity of resources deployed and the task
duration are inversely related.
A. IMPORTANT TERMS
DIRECT COST - the cost of labor, equipment, and material.
INDIRECT COST - he necessary costs of doing work which cannot be related
to a particular activity, and in some cases cannot be related to a specific
project.
NORMAL DURATION - a duration which implies minimum direct cost.
CRASHED DURATION - a minimum possible duration to complete the
activity, but at a maximum cost.
NORMAL COST - the least direct cost required to complete an activity
CRASH COST – a maximum cost in taking the shortest possible duration
required for completing the activity.
COST SLOPE – The slope of the line connecting the normal point (lower
point) and the crash point (upper point).
Cost slope = Crash cost – Normal cost / Normal duration – Crash
duration
B. ILLUSTRATION
C. EXAMPLE
subcontractor has the task of erecting 8400 square meter of metal scaffolds. The contractor can
use several crews with various costs. It is expected that the production will vary with the crew
size as given below:
Consider the following rates: Labor LE96/day; carpenter LE128/day; foreman LE144/day
and scaffolding LE60/day. Determine the direct cost of this activity considering different
crews formation.
Cost slope 1 (between points 1 and 2) = (33936 – 33252) / (51 – 42) = 76.22 LE/day
Cost slope 2 (between points 2 and 3) = (34632 – 33936) / (42 – 37) = 139.2 LE/day
\
B. EXAMPLE
Assume the following project data given in Table 8.1. It is required to crash the
project duration from its original duration to a final duration of 110 days. Assume
daily indirect cost of LE 100.
Solution
The cost slope of each activity is calculated. Both the crashability and the cost
slope are shown beneath each activity in the precedence diagram. The critical path is
B-C-D-E and the project duration in 140 days. Project total normal direct cost = sum
2. At this step activity “E” will be crashed, as this activity lies on both critical paths.
Activity “E” will be shortened by 10 days.
Accordingly, all activities will b turn to critical activities.
New Project duration is 120 days.
The project direct cost is increased by 10 x 120 = LE 1200.
Project direct cost = 48900 + 1200 = LE 50100
3. In this step, it is difficult to decrease one activity’s duration and achieve
decreasing in the project duration. So, either to crash an activity on all critical
paths (if any), otherwise, choose several activities on different critical paths. As
shown, activities “A” and “B” can be crashed together which have the least cost
slope (100 + 200). Then, crash activities “A” and “B” by 5 days.